首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of General Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Gabapentinoids and unexplained death in general practice: Case series and feasibility study arising from a critical incident. 加巴喷丁类药物与全科医学中无法解释的死亡:由严重事件引起的病例系列和可行性研究。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2026.2645473
Augustin Gabriel, Tom Fahey

Background: Prescribing epidemiology in general practice shows gabapentinoid drugs to be independently associated with unexpected, drug-related death. There is an increasing trend of gabapentinoid deaths throughout Europe and North America.

Objectives: The overall aim of this study was to assess how patient, practice and health system factors might be associated with gabapentinoid prescribing in primary care.

Methods: Case series following a critical incident of an unexpected death in a patient prescribed a gabapentinoid drug in a single general practice. Unexpected and expected deaths in patients prescribed a gabapentinoid drug deaths over an 11-year period in a single general practice. We examined patient, prescriber and health system factors. Toxicology and post-mortem data were provided by the Coroner.

Results: There were 36 deaths (four unexpected and 32 expected deaths) during the study period. Of the four patients who suffered an unexpected death, one of these patients' cause of death could be attributed to drug and alcohol toxicity. Over half of gabapentinoid prescribing (n = 19,53%) was hospital initiated, often 'off-label' (n = 6, 17%) and commonly co-prescribed with opiates (n = 15, 42%) and benzodiazepines (n = 11, 31%) to patients with high multi-morbidity.

Conclusions: Gabapentinoids are often initiated in the outpatient setting in clinically complex patients, often for 'off label' indications, with high polypharmacy. Patient, practice and health-system related factors need to be addressed in relation to gabapentinoid associated deaths and reflected in clinical practice guidelines. There is critical value in using toxicology reports from Coroner's offices in cases of unexplained gabapentinoid death in general practice.

背景:一般实践中的处方流行病学表明,加巴喷丁类药物与意外的药物相关性死亡独立相关。在整个欧洲和北美,加巴喷丁类药物的死亡率呈上升趋势。目的:本研究的总体目的是评估患者、实践和卫生系统因素如何与初级保健中加巴喷丁类药物的处方相关。方法:病例系列后,一个严重事件的意外死亡的病人开了加巴喷丁类药物在一个单一的全科医生。加巴喷丁类药物患者11年期间的意外死亡和预期死亡。我们检查了患者、处方者和卫生系统因素。毒理学和尸检数据由验尸官提供。结果:研究期间共发生36例死亡(4例意外死亡,32例预期死亡)。在四名意外死亡的患者中,其中一名患者的死因可归因于药物和酒精中毒。超过一半的加巴喷丁类药物处方(n = 19,53%)是医院发起的,通常是“标签外”(n = 6,17 %),并且通常与阿片类药物(n = 15,42 %)和苯二氮卓类药物(n = 11,31 %)合开给高多重发病率的患者。结论:加巴喷丁类药物通常在门诊开始用于临床复杂的患者,通常用于“标签外”适应症,具有高度的多药性。与加巴喷丁类相关死亡有关的患者、实践和卫生系统相关因素需要得到解决,并反映在临床实践指南中。在一般实践中,在不明原因的加巴喷丁类死亡病例中,使用验尸官办公室的毒理学报告具有关键价值。
{"title":"Gabapentinoids and unexplained death in general practice: Case series and feasibility study arising from a critical incident.","authors":"Augustin Gabriel, Tom Fahey","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2645473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2026.2645473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing epidemiology in general practice shows gabapentinoid drugs to be independently associated with unexpected, drug-related death. There is an increasing trend of gabapentinoid deaths throughout Europe and North America.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The overall aim of this study was to assess how patient, practice and health system factors might be associated with gabapentinoid prescribing in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case series following a critical incident of an unexpected death in a patient prescribed a gabapentinoid drug in a single general practice. Unexpected and expected deaths in patients prescribed a gabapentinoid drug deaths over an 11-year period in a single general practice. We examined patient, prescriber and health system factors. Toxicology and post-mortem data were provided by the Coroner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 36 deaths (four unexpected and 32 expected deaths) during the study period. Of the four patients who suffered an unexpected death, one of these patients' cause of death could be attributed to drug and alcohol toxicity. Over half of gabapentinoid prescribing (<i>n</i> = 19,53%) was hospital initiated, often 'off-label' (<i>n</i> = 6, 17%) and commonly co-prescribed with opiates (<i>n</i> = 15, 42%) and benzodiazepines (<i>n</i> = 11, 31%) to patients with high multi-morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gabapentinoids are often initiated in the outpatient setting in clinically complex patients, often for 'off label' indications, with high polypharmacy. Patient, practice and health-system related factors need to be addressed in relation to gabapentinoid associated deaths and reflected in clinical practice guidelines. There is critical value in using toxicology reports from Coroner's offices in cases of unexplained gabapentinoid death in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2645473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
External validation of risk scores and multivariate models for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in outpatients. 门诊患者社区获得性肺炎诊断风险评分和多变量模型的外部验证。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2026.2628370
Mark Ebell, Dan J Merenstein, Bruce Barrett, Theo Verheij, Paul Little

Background: While several risk scores for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have been developed, they require prospective external validation.

Objectives: To externally validate existing prediction models, risk scores, and heuristics for the diagnosis of CAP in adults.

Methods: The Enhancing Antibiotic Stewardship in Primary Care (EAST-PC) study recorded signs, symptoms, demographics, and vitals in 718 adults presenting to primary or urgent care clinics with acute lower respiratory tract infection between 2019 and 2023. C-reactive protein (CRP) was available for 575. The diagnosis of CAP was based on the clinician diagnosis and/or chest radiograph. Literature was searched for previous risk scores. Using the EAST-PC population, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC), calibration curves, and percentage with CAP in each risk group were calculated for each risk score.

Results: We identified 11 studies describing 4 risk scores, 9 multivariate models, and 5 simple heuristics. The Genomics to Combat Resistance Against Antibiotics in Community-acquired LRTI in Europe (GRACE) risk score using the absence of a runny nose, the presence of breathlessness, crackles, diminished vesicular breathing, heart rate > 100/min, temperature >37.8 °C, and CRP > 30 mg/L was the most accurate (AUROCC 0.81). It classified 280 patients as low (0.7% CAP), 265 as moderate (5.7%) and 30 as high risk (33.3%) for CAP. The GRACE score without CRP performed similarly. Other risk scores had poor calibration or failed to accurately classify patients as low or high risk.

Conclusions: The previously derived GRACE risk scores were successfully externally validated in a contemporary US outpatient population.

背景:虽然已经开发了几种诊断社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的风险评分,但它们需要前瞻性的外部验证。目的:外部验证成人CAP诊断的现有预测模型、风险评分和启发式方法。方法:加强初级保健抗生素管理(EAST-PC)研究记录了2019年至2023年期间在初级或急诊诊所就诊的718名急性下呼吸道感染成人的体征、症状、人口统计学和生命体征。575例检测到c反应蛋白(CRP)。CAP的诊断是基于临床医生的诊断和/或胸片。文献检索了以前的风险评分。使用EAST-PC人群,计算每个风险组中受试者工作特征曲线(AUROCC)下的面积、校准曲线和CAP的百分比。结果:我们确定了11项研究,描述了4种风险评分,9种多变量模型和5种简单的启发式。欧洲社区获得性LRTI抗抗生素耐药性基因组学(GRACE)风险评分采用无流鼻水、呼吸困难、噼啪声、水泡性呼吸减少、心率>00 /min、体温>37.8°C和CRP > 30 mg/L最为准确(AUROCC 0.81)。280例患者为CAP低危(0.7% CAP), 265例为中度(5.7%),30例为高危(33.3%)。无CRP的GRACE评分结果相似。其他风险评分校准不良或无法准确地将患者划分为低风险或高风险。结论:先前导出的GRACE风险评分在当代美国门诊人群中成功地进行了外部验证。
{"title":"External validation of risk scores and multivariate models for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in outpatients.","authors":"Mark Ebell, Dan J Merenstein, Bruce Barrett, Theo Verheij, Paul Little","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2628370","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2628370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While several risk scores for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have been developed, they require prospective external validation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To externally validate existing prediction models, risk scores, and heuristics for the diagnosis of CAP in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Enhancing Antibiotic Stewardship in Primary Care (EAST-PC) study recorded signs, symptoms, demographics, and vitals in 718 adults presenting to primary or urgent care clinics with acute lower respiratory tract infection between 2019 and 2023. C-reactive protein (CRP) was available for 575. The diagnosis of CAP was based on the clinician diagnosis and/or chest radiograph. Literature was searched for previous risk scores. Using the EAST-PC population, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC), calibration curves, and percentage with CAP in each risk group were calculated for each risk score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 studies describing 4 risk scores, 9 multivariate models, and 5 simple heuristics. The Genomics to Combat Resistance Against Antibiotics in Community-acquired LRTI in Europe (GRACE) risk score using the absence of a runny nose, the presence of breathlessness, crackles, diminished vesicular breathing, heart rate > 100/min, temperature >37.8 °C, and CRP > 30 mg/L was the most accurate (AUROCC 0.81). It classified 280 patients as low (0.7% CAP), 265 as moderate (5.7%) and 30 as high risk (33.3%) for CAP. The GRACE score without CRP performed similarly. Other risk scores had poor calibration or failed to accurately classify patients as low or high risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The previously derived GRACE risk scores were successfully externally validated in a contemporary US outpatient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2628370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927402/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146260084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of nurse practitioners in primary care on patients with chronic diseases in rural and underserved areas: A systematic review. 初级保健护士从业人员对农村和服务不足地区慢性病患者的影响:一项系统综述。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2026.2613495
Ariane Sacchetti, Mélanie Berube, Christophe Pison, Marc-Aurèle Gagnon, Alexandre Bellier

Background: Ageing, multimorbidity, and workforce shortages increasingly limit access to primary healthcare, especially in rural and underserved areas.

Objectives: To document impact of nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary care on patients with chronic diseases.

Methods: Searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL (March 1978-October 2023). This systematic review followed MECIR and PRISMA guidelines (PRISMA 2020 checklist: EQUATOR Network) with SWiM used as a PRISMA extension due to the lack of meta-analysis. The focus was on NPs' roles in chronic disease management and primary care in underserved or remote areas, excluding mental health, cancer, and dental care.

Results: Among 3,684 citations, 25 studies were selected, including 10 RCT. NPs may improve access to primary care and chronic disease management, particularly in underserved areas. Although not all studies directly compared NPs to traditional models, they were most often assessed against General Practitioners (GPs) alone. Seven studies also evaluated collaborative NP-GP models versus GP-only care. Patient satisfaction was generally higher with NPs, possibly due to longer consultations and greater patient education. Clinical and biological outcomes were often comparable between NPs and GPs, with the best results in collaborative models, which were also associated with higher costs.

Conclusion: NPs may enhance access to care, particularly for vulnerable populations. Higher patient satisfaction may be linked to longer consultations and patient education. While clinical outcomes were comparable to those of GPs, collaborative models yielded the best results, though potentially at a higher cost.

背景:老龄化、多病和劳动力短缺日益限制获得初级卫生保健,特别是在农村和服务不足地区。目的:探讨初级保健护理人员(NPs)对慢性病患者的影响。方法:在Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和CENTRAL(1978年3月- 2023年10月)中进行检索。该系统评价遵循MECIR和PRISMA指南(PRISMA 2020检查表:EQUATOR Network),由于缺乏meta分析,使用SWiM作为PRISMA的扩展。重点是国家志愿人员在服务不足或偏远地区的慢性病管理和初级保健方面的作用,不包括精神卫生、癌症和牙科保健。结果:在3684篇引文中,共入选25篇研究,其中RCT 10篇。新方案可改善获得初级保健和慢性病管理的机会,特别是在服务不足的地区。虽然不是所有的研究都直接将NPs与传统模型进行比较,但它们通常是单独针对全科医生(gp)进行评估的。7项研究还评估了协同NP-GP模式与仅gp护理的对比。NPs的患者满意度普遍较高,可能是由于更长时间的咨询和更好的患者教育。NPs和gp之间的临床和生物学结果通常具有可比性,合作模式的结果最好,这也与更高的成本有关。结论:NPs可以增加获得护理的机会,特别是对弱势群体。更高的患者满意度可能与更长时间的咨询和患者教育有关。虽然临床结果与全科医生的结果相当,但合作模式产生了最好的结果,尽管成本可能更高。
{"title":"Impact of nurse practitioners in primary care on patients with chronic diseases in rural and underserved areas: A systematic review.","authors":"Ariane Sacchetti, Mélanie Berube, Christophe Pison, Marc-Aurèle Gagnon, Alexandre Bellier","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2613495","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2613495","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ageing, multimorbidity, and workforce shortages increasingly limit access to primary healthcare, especially in rural and underserved areas.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To document impact of nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary care on patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL (March 1978-October 2023). This systematic review followed MECIR and PRISMA guidelines (PRISMA 2020 checklist: EQUATOR Network) with SWiM used as a PRISMA extension due to the lack of meta-analysis. The focus was on NPs' roles in chronic disease management and primary care in underserved or remote areas, excluding mental health, cancer, and dental care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,684 citations, 25 studies were selected, including 10 RCT. NPs may improve access to primary care and chronic disease management, particularly in underserved areas. Although not all studies directly compared NPs to traditional models, they were most often assessed against General Practitioners (GPs) alone. Seven studies also evaluated collaborative NP-GP models versus GP-only care. Patient satisfaction was generally higher with NPs, possibly due to longer consultations and greater patient education. Clinical and biological outcomes were often comparable between NPs and GPs, with the best results in collaborative models, which were also associated with higher costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPs may enhance access to care, particularly for vulnerable populations. Higher patient satisfaction may be linked to longer consultations and patient education. While clinical outcomes were comparable to those of GPs, collaborative models yielded the best results, though potentially at a higher cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2613495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849805/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Dutch General Practitioners ultrasound referrals and opportunities for point-of-care ultrasound: A retrospective analysis. 评估荷兰全科医生超声转诊和护理点超声的机会:回顾性分析。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2606572
Jelien Geivers, Ralph T H Leijenaar, Lola Ramakers, Jochen W L Cals, Frank M Zijta, J Martijn Nobel, Ramon P G Ottenheijm

Background: General practitioners (GPs) frequently refer patients for abdominal ultrasound. Depending on the clinical context, a 'triage ultrasound' can assess multiple potential causes of abdominal symptoms, while a 'targeted ultrasound' (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS) focuses on specific indications (e.g. cholelithiasis).

Objective: To assess whether medical questions posed by GPs in abdominal ultrasound referral letters are adequate for radiologists to perform their examination, and to identify indications for POCUS by GPs based on exclusion rates and alternative findings in radiological reports.

Methods: Retrospective study analysing GP referral letters with corresponding radiology reports referred for abdominal ultrasound. Key variables: GP's medical question, indication type and the radiologist's final interpretation, following established diagnostic guidelines.

Results: A total of 1,196 referral letters with corresponding reports were reviewed. Of these, 143 (12%) were excluded, primarily due to missing clinical information from the GP (102; 8.5%). The final sample comprised 1053 referral letters with reports (mean age 59.2 years; 60% female). Sixteen percent of referral letters lacked a medical question, and 33% included exclusively guideline-based indications. The most common guideline-based indications were urolithiasis (43%) and cholelithiasis (39%). For guideline-based requests, radiologists excluded the indicated condition in 75% of cases, and an alternative diagnosis was identified in fewer than 10%.

Conclusion: GPs frequently provide insufficient clinically relevant information in abdominal ultrasound referral letters. Simple cases with well-defined clinical queries like cholelithiasis, urolithiasis, hydronephrosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm seem suitable for POCUS evaluation, as these are often excluded conditions for which the risk of overlooking serious diagnoses is low.

背景:全科医生(gp)经常推荐患者进行腹部超声检查。根据临床情况,“分诊超声”可以评估腹部症状的多种潜在原因,而“靶向超声”(即时超声,POCUS)侧重于特定适应症(如胆石症)。目的:评估全科医生在腹部超声转诊信中提出的医学问题是否足以供放射科医生进行检查,并根据放射报告中的排除率和替代结果确定全科医生的POCUS指征。方法:回顾性分析全科医生的转诊信和相应的腹部超声报告。关键变量:全科医生的医疗问题,指征类型和放射科医生的最终解释,遵循既定的诊断指南。结果:共审阅了1196封有相应报告的转诊信。其中,143例(12%)被排除,主要是由于缺少GP的临床信息(102例;8.5%)。最终样本包括1053封带报告的推荐信(平均年龄59.2岁,60%为女性)。16%的转诊信缺乏医学问题,33%的转诊信只包括基于指南的适应症。最常见的指南适应症是尿石症(43%)和胆石症(39%)。对于基于指南的请求,放射科医生在75%的病例中排除了所指示的病症,并且在不到10%的病例中确定了替代诊断。结论:全科医生在腹部超声转诊信中提供的临床相关信息往往不足。有明确临床问题的简单病例,如胆石症、尿石症、肾积水和腹主动脉瘤,似乎适合POCUS评估,因为这些病例通常被排除在外,忽视严重诊断的风险较低。
{"title":"Evaluation of Dutch General Practitioners ultrasound referrals and opportunities for point-of-care ultrasound: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Jelien Geivers, Ralph T H Leijenaar, Lola Ramakers, Jochen W L Cals, Frank M Zijta, J Martijn Nobel, Ramon P G Ottenheijm","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2606572","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2606572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) frequently refer patients for abdominal ultrasound. Depending on the clinical context, a 'triage ultrasound' can assess multiple potential causes of abdominal symptoms, while a 'targeted ultrasound' (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS) focuses on specific indications (e.g. cholelithiasis).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether medical questions posed by GPs in abdominal ultrasound referral letters are adequate for radiologists to perform their examination, and to identify indications for POCUS by GPs based on exclusion rates and alternative findings in radiological reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study analysing GP referral letters with corresponding radiology reports referred for abdominal ultrasound. Key variables: GP's medical question, indication type and the radiologist's final interpretation, following established diagnostic guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,196 referral letters with corresponding reports were reviewed. Of these, 143 (12%) were excluded, primarily due to missing clinical information from the GP (102; 8.5%). The final sample comprised 1053 referral letters with reports (mean age 59.2 years; 60% female). Sixteen percent of referral letters lacked a medical question, and 33% included exclusively guideline-based indications. The most common guideline-based indications were urolithiasis (43%) and cholelithiasis (39%). For guideline-based requests, radiologists excluded the indicated condition in 75% of cases, and an alternative diagnosis was identified in fewer than 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs frequently provide insufficient clinically relevant information in abdominal ultrasound referral letters. Simple cases with well-defined clinical queries like cholelithiasis, urolithiasis, hydronephrosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm seem suitable for POCUS evaluation, as these are often excluded conditions for which the risk of overlooking serious diagnoses is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2606572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivational factors for general practice training and career establishment: A cross-sectional study in Flanders, Belgium. 全科医生培训和职业生涯建立的动机因素:比利时法兰德斯的横断面研究。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2026.2628411
Lotta E Coenen, Madieke Maseman, Janique Lobbestael, Guy Gielis, Ann Gils, Johan Vansintejan, Inès Van Rossem

Background: In Flanders, Belgium, the 3-year specialised training in General Practice includes a specialty training rotation, for which trainees may choose their training site. After graduation, General Practitioners (GPs) decide where to establish their practice.

Objective: This study explored the factors influencing GP trainees' choice of training location, reasons for settling in a specific region after graduation, and motivations for remaining in or leaving a practice.

Methods: In May 2024, the Interuniversity Centre for Education of General Practitioners distributed an anonymous online survey with closed- and open-ended questions to all GP alumni graduating between 2014 and 2023. Quantitative data were analysed using linear regression; qualitative data underwent content analysis.

Results: Of 772 alumni respondents (26.7% response rate), 93.4% were still practising as a GP. Most were female (70.9%), and 37.2% engaged in additional professional roles. Key influences on training location choice and practice settlement included colleague connections, proximity to home, and opportunities to work in group practices. Decisions to stay in or leave a practice were shaped by interpersonal relationships, practice organisation, and work-life balance. Working as a substitute GP was a frequent reason for changing practices, especially among recent graduates, to explore varied working environments.

Conclusion: Both interpersonal and logistical factors strongly influence training practice choice and later GP practice settlement. High-quality training practices and supportive work environments are essential to promote sustainable GP careers and achieve a more balanced geographical distribution of GPs.

背景:在比利时的佛兰德斯,全科医学的3年专业培训包括专业培训轮转,受训者可以选择他们的培训地点。毕业后,全科医生(gp)决定在哪里建立他们的实践。目的:探讨全科医生学员对培训地点选择的影响因素、毕业后在特定地区定居的原因以及留在或离开实习单位的动机。方法:2024年5月,跨大学全科医生教育中心向2014年至2023年毕业的所有全科医生校友分发了一份匿名在线调查,其中包含封闭式和开放式问题。定量资料采用线性回归分析;定性数据进行内容分析。结果:在772名校友受访者中,93.4%仍在从事全科医生的工作,回应率为26.7%。大多数是女性(70.9%),37.2%从事额外的专业角色。影响培训地点选择和实践解决的关键因素包括同事关系、离家近和在团队实践中工作的机会。决定留在或离开一个实践是由人际关系,实践组织和工作与生活的平衡。作为一名替代全科医生是改变做法的常见原因,尤其是在应届毕业生中,以探索不同的工作环境。结论:人际因素和后勤因素对培训实习选择和后续全科医生实习安置均有显著影响。高质量的培训实践和支持性的工作环境对于促进全科医生职业的可持续发展和实现全科医生更均衡的地理分布至关重要。
{"title":"Motivational factors for general practice training and career establishment: A cross-sectional study in Flanders, Belgium.","authors":"Lotta E Coenen, Madieke Maseman, Janique Lobbestael, Guy Gielis, Ann Gils, Johan Vansintejan, Inès Van Rossem","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2628411","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2628411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Flanders, Belgium, the 3-year specialised training in General Practice includes a specialty training rotation, for which trainees may choose their training site. After graduation, General Practitioners (GPs) decide where to establish their practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the factors influencing GP trainees' choice of training location, reasons for settling in a specific region after graduation, and motivations for remaining in or leaving a practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In May 2024, the Interuniversity Centre for Education of General Practitioners distributed an anonymous online survey with closed- and open-ended questions to all GP alumni graduating between 2014 and 2023. Quantitative data were analysed using linear regression; qualitative data underwent content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 772 alumni respondents (26.7% response rate), 93.4% were still practising as a GP. Most were female (70.9%), and 37.2% engaged in additional professional roles. Key influences on training location choice and practice settlement included colleague connections, proximity to home, and opportunities to work in group practices. Decisions to stay in or leave a practice were shaped by interpersonal relationships, practice organisation, and work-life balance. Working as a substitute GP was a frequent reason for changing practices, especially among recent graduates, to explore varied working environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both interpersonal and logistical factors strongly influence training practice choice and later GP practice settlement. High-quality training practices and supportive work environments are essential to promote sustainable GP careers and achieve a more balanced geographical distribution of GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2628411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12934332/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147286340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future is now: Towards intelligent use of Generative AI in general practice. 未来就是现在:在一般实践中智能地使用生成人工智能。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2602356
Jako S Burgers, Angelina Müller
{"title":"The future is now: Towards intelligent use of Generative AI in general practice.","authors":"Jako S Burgers, Angelina Müller","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2602356","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2602356","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2602356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781954/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cancer screening in patients with severe psychiatric disorders in France: Towards a coordinated and inclusive approach. 法国严重精神障碍患者的癌症筛查:朝着协调和包容的方向发展。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-30 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2026.2619260
Nadine Pellen, Bleuenn Gouzien, Manon Troënes, Sarah Khelifi, Gaëlle Ragot, Aziliz Le Glaz

Background: The close link between mental health and physical health is evident in patients with severe psychiatric disorders (SPD), such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. SPD is associated with a reduction in life expectancy, due to excess mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. In patients with SPD, reduced access to cancer screening programs, due to cognitive, organisational and social barriers, leads to late detection and worse prognosis.

Objectives: The objective was to identify the barriers and facilitators to systematic cancer screening in patients with SPD, with a focus on the role of general practitioners (GPs) in improving access to preventive care.

Method: This study was conducted in the Finistère department, France. A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with GPs, recorded, anonymised, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a grounded theory approach.

Results: From October 2023 to February 2024, 25 GPs were interviewed. The analysis highlighted 3 areas for improving access to cancer screening: logistic support, active involvement of the family and professional support networks and coordination among the healthcare providers. Barriers included the patients' lack of autonomy, difficulties in accessing transport, precariousness and complexity of the screening process, particularly for at-home screening tests. Family and friends play a key role, but remain vulnerable to caregiver burnout.

Conclusion: These results confirm the importance of a multi-professional and integrative approach, with GPs playing a central role in addressing the specific vulnerabilities of this population. More research, involving patients, caregivers and psychiatric teams, is needed to co-construct appropriate, sustainable and ethically sound solutions.

背景:在精神分裂症和双相情感障碍等严重精神障碍(SPD)患者中,心理健康和身体健康之间的密切联系是显而易见的。由于心血管疾病和癌症造成的死亡率过高,SPD与预期寿命缩短有关。在SPD患者中,由于认知、组织和社会障碍,获得癌症筛查项目的机会减少,导致发现较晚和预后较差。目的:目的是确定对SPD患者进行系统性癌症筛查的障碍和促进因素,重点关注全科医生(gp)在改善获得预防性护理方面的作用。方法:本研究在法国finistires部门进行。一项定性研究,基于与全科医生的半结构化访谈,记录,匿名,逐字转录,并使用接地理论方法进行分析。结果:从2023年10月至2024年2月,共采访了25名全科医生。该分析强调了改善癌症筛查的3个方面:后勤支持、家庭和专业支持网络的积极参与以及医疗保健提供者之间的协调。障碍包括患者缺乏自主权、交通不便、筛查过程的不稳定性和复杂性,特别是家庭筛查测试。家人和朋友发挥着关键作用,但仍然容易受到照顾者倦怠的影响。结论:这些结果证实了多专业和综合方法的重要性,全科医生在解决这一人群的特定脆弱性方面发挥了核心作用。需要更多的研究,包括患者、护理人员和精神科团队,共同构建适当的、可持续的和合乎道德的解决方案。
{"title":"Cancer screening in patients with severe psychiatric disorders in France: Towards a coordinated and inclusive approach.","authors":"Nadine Pellen, Bleuenn Gouzien, Manon Troënes, Sarah Khelifi, Gaëlle Ragot, Aziliz Le Glaz","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2619260","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2026.2619260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The close link between mental health and physical health is evident in patients with severe psychiatric disorders (SPD), such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. SPD is associated with a reduction in life expectancy, due to excess mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. In patients with SPD, reduced access to cancer screening programs, due to cognitive, organisational and social barriers, leads to late detection and worse prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to identify the barriers and facilitators to systematic cancer screening in patients with SPD, with a focus on the role of general practitioners (GPs) in improving access to preventive care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was conducted in the Finistère department, France. A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with GPs, recorded, anonymised, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2023 to February 2024, 25 GPs were interviewed. The analysis highlighted 3 areas for improving access to cancer screening: logistic support, active involvement of the family and professional support networks and coordination among the healthcare providers. Barriers included the patients' lack of autonomy, difficulties in accessing transport, precariousness and complexity of the screening process, particularly for at-home screening tests. Family and friends play a key role, but remain vulnerable to caregiver burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results confirm the importance of a multi-professional and integrative approach, with GPs playing a central role in addressing the specific vulnerabilities of this population. More research, involving patients, caregivers and psychiatric teams, is needed to co-construct appropriate, sustainable and ethically sound solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"2619260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146183332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors influencing appropriate vestibular care: An interview study with general practitioners and patients. 影响适当前庭护理的因素:对全科医生和患者的访谈研究。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-12-06 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2600144
Hà T N Ngo, Otto R Maarsingh, Pauline Slottje, Marco H Blanker, Jettie Bont, Vincent A van Vugt

Background: General practitioners (GPs) frequently prescribe anti-vertigo drugs (AVDs), even though there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. Meanwhile, they rarely apply vestibular rehabilitation, a treatment for various vestibular disorders with a strong evidence base.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to appropriate vestibular care in general practice.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in Dutch general practice using semi-structured interviews with GPs and patients with vestibular symptoms. We used purposive sampling to select participants. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed following the Template Analysis approach using MAXQDA 2022 software.

Results: We interviewed 11 GPs and 15 patients. We assessed barriers and facilitators to appropriate vestibular care for GPs (i.e. not prescribing AVDs, advising vestibular exercises) and patients (i.e. not using AVDs, doing vestibular exercises). We identified four themes: competence, mindset, relational determinants, and accessibility to care. Facilitators included adequate knowledge about vestibular disorders, GPs valuing delivering high-value care, positive experiences with physiotherapy, patients' coping skills, personal continuity, close collaboration between GP and colleagues, social support, and sufficient time and availability of providers. Barriers included diagnosis and treatment insecurity among GPs, patients doubting the GPs' competence, patients' desperation for treatment and GPs accommodating these wishes, positive experiences with AVDs, prescriptions by other providers, and insurance not covering physiotherapy.

Conclusion: Multiple barriers and facilitators shape appropriate vestibular care in general practice. Interventions should strengthen GPs' and patients' knowledge of vestibular management. Internet-based vestibular rehabilitation may address key barriers, particularly logistic and financial ones.

背景:全科医生(gp)经常开抗眩晕药物(AVDs),即使证据有限的有效性。同时,他们很少应用前庭康复治疗,而前庭康复治疗是一种有很强证据基础的治疗各种前庭疾病的方法。目的:本研究旨在确定在一般实践中适当前庭护理的障碍和促进因素。方法:我们对荷兰全科医生和前庭症状患者采用半结构化访谈进行了定性研究。我们采用有目的抽样来选择参与者。访谈录音,逐字转录,并使用MAXQDA 2022软件按照模板分析方法进行主题分析。结果:我们采访了11名全科医生和15名患者。我们评估了全科医生(即不开avd,建议前庭运动)和患者(即不使用avd,做前庭运动)适当前庭护理的障碍和促进因素。我们确定了四个主题:能力、心态、关系决定因素和护理可及性。辅助因素包括充分了解前庭疾病、全科医生重视提供高价值护理、物理治疗的积极经验、患者应对技能、个人连续性、全科医生和同事之间的密切合作、社会支持以及充足的时间和可用性。障碍包括全科医生的诊断和治疗不安全,病人怀疑全科医生的能力,病人对治疗的绝望和全科医生满足这些愿望,avd的积极经验,其他提供者的处方,以及不包括物理治疗的保险。结论:在一般实践中,多种障碍和辅助因素形成了适当的前庭护理。干预措施应加强全科医生和患者对前庭管理的认识。基于互联网的前庭康复可以解决主要障碍,特别是后勤和财政障碍。
{"title":"Factors influencing appropriate vestibular care: An interview study with general practitioners and patients.","authors":"Hà T N Ngo, Otto R Maarsingh, Pauline Slottje, Marco H Blanker, Jettie Bont, Vincent A van Vugt","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2600144","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2600144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) frequently prescribe anti-vertigo drugs (AVDs), even though there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. Meanwhile, they rarely apply vestibular rehabilitation, a treatment for various vestibular disorders with a strong evidence base.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to appropriate vestibular care in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study in Dutch general practice using semi-structured interviews with GPs and patients with vestibular symptoms. We used purposive sampling to select participants. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed following the Template Analysis approach using MAXQDA 2022 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 11 GPs and 15 patients. We assessed barriers and facilitators to appropriate vestibular care for GPs (i.e. not prescribing AVDs, advising vestibular exercises) and patients (i.e. not using AVDs, doing vestibular exercises). We identified four themes: competence, mindset, relational determinants, and accessibility to care. Facilitators included adequate knowledge about vestibular disorders, GPs valuing delivering high-value care, positive experiences with physiotherapy, patients' coping skills, personal continuity, close collaboration between GP and colleagues, social support, and sufficient time and availability of providers. Barriers included diagnosis and treatment insecurity among GPs, patients doubting the GPs' competence, patients' desperation for treatment and GPs accommodating these wishes, positive experiences with AVDs, prescriptions by other providers, and insurance not covering physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple barriers and facilitators shape appropriate vestibular care in general practice. Interventions should strengthen GPs' and patients' knowledge of vestibular management. Internet-based vestibular rehabilitation may address key barriers, particularly logistic and financial ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2600144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12710262/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burnout among Catalan general practitioners. A repeated cross-sectional study, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 加泰罗尼亚全科医生的职业倦怠。在COVID-19大流行期间和之后进行的重复横断面研究。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2485073
Maria Miñana- Castellanos, María Isabel Fernández-San-Martín, María Rodríguez-Barragán, Maria Teresa Santos E Silva Caldeira Marques, Antoni Sisó, Josep Basora, Enric Aragonès

Background: COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant impact on healthcare workers' mental health and burnout, which continues after the pandemic.

Objectives: To assess the levels of burnout in general practitioners (GP) in Catalonia at three different times.

Methods: Cross-sectional study involving members of the GPs' Catalan Society (n = 4700). A self-administered survey was sent via institutional email in June-July 2021 (T1), in March-April 2022 (T2), and in May-June 2023 (T3). Probable burnout was assessed through Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) test, with three independent dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal achievement. A descriptive analysis was performed, as well as a comparison between T1, T2, and T3 results.

Results: 500 GPs responded in T1, 454 in T2, and 386 in T3. Samples were similar in demographic variables. Regarding burnout dimensions, the level of emotional exhaustion was 67.5% in T1, with a statistically significant decrease in T2 and T3 (56.4 and 58.1%, respectively, p = 0.001); levels of depersonalisation were 42.7% in T1, 37.0% in T2 and 36.7% in T3 (p = 0.091); levels of personal achievement were 29.9% in T1, 30.4% in T2 and 24.2% in T3 (p = 0.086).  Starting at high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation, the prevalence decreased significantly over time in two groups: women and GPs who worked <10 years at the same workplace.

Conclusion: Catalan GPs experienced significant burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic with emotional exhaustion being particularly high. Although the prevalence of burnout decreased slightly over time, over half of the participants consistently reported high levels of emotional exhaustion.

背景:COVID-19大流行对医护人员的心理健康和职业倦怠造成了重大影响,这种影响在大流行后仍在持续。目的:评估加泰罗尼亚全科医生(GP)在三个不同时期的职业倦怠水平。方法:横断面研究涉及全科医生加泰罗尼亚协会成员(n = 4700)。在2021年6月至7月(T1)、2022年3月至4月(T2)和2023年5月至6月(T3)通过机构电子邮件发送自我管理的调查。通过马斯拉克倦怠量表(MBI)评估可能的倦怠,包括情绪耗竭、人格解体和个人成就三个独立维度。进行描述性分析,并比较T1、T2和T3的结果。结果:T1有应答500名,T2有应答454名,T3有应答386名。样本的人口学变量相似。倦怠维度上,T1期情绪耗竭水平为67.5%,T2、T3期情绪耗竭水平下降,差异有统计学意义(分别为56.4、58.1%,p = 0.001);T1、T2和T3的人格解体水平分别为42.7%、37.0%和36.7% (p = 0.091);T1为29.9%,T2为30.4%,T3为24.2% (p = 0.086)。 从高度的情绪疲惫和人格解体开始,两组的患病率随着时间的推移显着下降:女性和工作的全科医生。结论:加泰罗尼亚全科医生在COVID-19大流行期间经历了严重的倦怠,情绪疲惫特别高。尽管随着时间的推移,倦怠的患病率略有下降,但超过一半的参与者一直报告说自己情绪疲惫程度很高。
{"title":"Burnout among Catalan general practitioners. A repeated cross-sectional study, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Maria Miñana- Castellanos, María Isabel Fernández-San-Martín, María Rodríguez-Barragán, Maria Teresa Santos E Silva Caldeira Marques, Antoni Sisó, Josep Basora, Enric Aragonès","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2485073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2485073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant impact on healthcare workers' mental health and burnout, which continues after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the levels of burnout in general practitioners (GP) in Catalonia at three different times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study involving members of the GPs' Catalan Society (<i>n</i> = 4700). A self-administered survey was sent via institutional email in June-July 2021 (T1), in March-April 2022 (T2), and in May-June 2023 (T3). Probable burnout was assessed through Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) test, with three independent dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal achievement. A descriptive analysis was performed, as well as a comparison between T1, T2, and T3 results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>500 GPs responded in T1, 454 in T2, and 386 in T3. Samples were similar in demographic variables. Regarding burnout dimensions, the level of emotional exhaustion was 67.5% in T1, with a statistically significant decrease in T2 and T3 (56.4 and 58.1%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.001); levels of depersonalisation were 42.7% in T1, 37.0% in T2 and 36.7% in T3 (<i>p</i> = 0.091); levels of personal achievement were 29.9% in T1, 30.4% in T2 and 24.2% in T3 (<i>p</i> = 0.086).  Starting at high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation, the prevalence decreased significantly over time in two groups: women and GPs who worked <10 years at the same workplace.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Catalan GPs experienced significant burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic with emotional exhaustion being particularly high. Although the prevalence of burnout decreased slightly over time, over half of the participants consistently reported high levels of emotional exhaustion.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2485073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986852/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144021902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction. 修正。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2477962
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2477962","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2477962","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2477962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143765934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of General Practice
全部 Adv. Meteorol. Int. Geol. Rev. ECOL RESTOR Rev. Geophys. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Acta Geochimica 电力系统及其自动化学报 ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Int. J. Climatol. ICHNOS Isl. Arc J. Clim. ECOLOGY J. Appl. Phys. ARCH ACOUST Astrophys. Space Sci. ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic) Carbon Balance Manage. Pure Appl. Geophys. Environ. Eng. Res. ENG SANIT AMBIENT 2011 International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring Clean Technol. Environ. Policy Geobiology Aquat. Geochem. SEDIMENTOLOGY Geosci. J. Meteorol. Appl. Global Biogeochem. Cycles J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. Terra Nova Aeolian Res. ACTA CARDIOL OCEAN SCI J Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Appl. Phys. Rev. Surv. Rev. Ocean and Coastal Research EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP Basin Res. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. INT J MOD PHYS B Nucl. Sci. Tech. Z. Geomorphol. Commun. Theor. Phys. J OPT TECHNOL+ Stud. Geophys. Geod. Mon. Weather Rev. Clim. Change Études Caribéennes European journal of biochemistry J. Math. Phys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. CHIN OPT LETT B SOC GEOL MEX ACTA PETROL SIN Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Appl. Geochem. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. J. Earth Sci. AAPG Bull. Big Earth Data Acta Oceanolog. Sin. J. Afr. Earth. Sci. ACTA GEOL POL Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Am. Mineral. Acta Geophys. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. BIOGEOSCIENCES J. Atmos. Chem. QUATERNAIRE Adv. Atmos. Sci. Atmos. Res. COMP BIOCHEM PHYS C Atmos. Chem. Phys. Int. J. Biometeorol. Org. Geochem. Atmos. Meas. Tech. J. Hydrol. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. ARCHAEOMETRY Ann. Glaciol. Appl. Clay Sci. J. Seismic Explor. ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL Mineral. Mag. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Aust. J. Earth Sci. ECOTOXICOLOGY Am. J. Sci. ASTRON ASTROPHYS GEOHERITAGE Int. J. Earth Sci. Ecol. Res. APL Photonics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1