Nowadays, the idea that life affects the development of the planetary environment, and can, in turn, affect the future evolution of itself (in a coevolutionary way) is well-accepted. However, since the proposal of the Gaia hypothesis, there has been widespread criticism. Most of it is related to teleology, the absence of natural selection at a universal scale, and the lack of planetary reproduction. Some of the problems concerning the 'internal' logic of the idea have been resolved. Nevertheless, it is not sure whether Earth can be considered a unit of selection and (therefore) Gaia can adapt according to Darwinian evolution. After Lovelock and Margulis, Gaia has been considered a symbiotic planet composed of biotic (the biosphere) and abiotic (the geosphere-atmosphere) interacting with and coevolving elements. Here I propose why and suggest how a Gaian system should be considered alive in any evolutionary sense. I take into consideration the three principal criticisms and I analyse them following a logic-inductive reasoning. I use thought experiments and analogical arguments to analyse the rationale and the mechanisms by which Gaia evolves and may reproduce. This reasoning could allow rejecting the aforementioned criticisms as outdated and insufficient to discredit the main idea. I argue that without invoking teleology - so without any foresight or planning - a Gaian planet can be considered a coevolutionary system analogous to a multicellular body: a super-unit of selection. I describe different situations according to which Gaia is able to reproduce and transfer her planetary genome to other uninhabited or inhabited planets. Then I suggest that Gaia can face exclusion- competition-coexistence states depending on the fitness of her biota compared to those of the other reproducing biospheres. This demonstrates that Gaia can reproduce and evolve in competition-cooperation with other planets. Some deep implications arise from this evidence, also in light of the recent discovery of a new solar system with Earth-like planets by NASA.
{"title":"Adaptation, Evolution And Reproduction Of Gaia By The Means Of Our Species.","authors":"Roberto Cazzolla Gatti","doi":"10.19272/201711402003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201711402003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nowadays, the idea that life affects the development of the planetary environment, and can, in turn, affect the future evolution of itself (in a coevolutionary way) is well-accepted. However, since the proposal of the Gaia hypothesis, there has been widespread criticism. Most of it is related to teleology, the absence of natural selection at a universal scale, and the lack of planetary reproduction. Some of the problems concerning the 'internal' logic of the idea have been resolved. Nevertheless, it is not sure whether Earth can be considered a unit of selection and (therefore) Gaia can adapt according to Darwinian evolution. After Lovelock and Margulis, Gaia has been considered a symbiotic planet composed of biotic (the biosphere) and abiotic (the geosphere-atmosphere) interacting with and coevolving elements. Here I propose why and suggest how a Gaian system should be considered alive in any evolutionary sense. I take into consideration the three principal criticisms and I analyse them following a logic-inductive reasoning. I use thought experiments and analogical arguments to analyse the rationale and the mechanisms by which Gaia evolves and may reproduce. This reasoning could allow rejecting the aforementioned criticisms as outdated and insufficient to discredit the main idea. I argue that without invoking teleology - so without any foresight or planning - a Gaian planet can be considered a coevolutionary system analogous to a multicellular body: a super-unit of selection. I describe different situations according to which Gaia is able to reproduce and transfer her planetary genome to other uninhabited or inhabited planets. Then I suggest that Gaia can face exclusion- competition-coexistence states depending on the fitness of her biota compared to those of the other reproducing biospheres. This demonstrates that Gaia can reproduce and evolve in competition-cooperation with other planets. Some deep implications arise from this evidence, also in light of the recent discovery of a new solar system with Earth-like planets by NASA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36036006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The dawn of photosynthesis, characterized by the research of Priestley, Ingen- Housz and Senebier, culminated in 1804 with a historical essay of Théodore De Saussure. According to the historians, during the first half of the nineteenth century in which the genesis of the cell theory started off, the research on photosynthesis met a phase of stagnation. Indeed, the literature review of the period does not report particular innovation; however, several scientists (botanists, physiologists, and chemists) supported the thesis of De Saussure with a series of analyses that, in our opinion, deserve to be known. Mirbel, De Candolle, Raspail, Berzelius, Payen, Dutrochet, von Mohl, and other scholars attempted to expand knowledge on photosynthesis but were not able to arrive at a theory that was consistent with a functional mechanism, nor with a suitable chemical model to explain the transformation of the water and carbon dioxide into sugars. A classic case of such inadequacy concerns the discovery of chlorophyll. This compound, isolated in 1818 by Pelletier and Caventou, remained an enigma for many years and was never put in relation with the synthesis of starch. The accurate research of von Mohl led this scientist to believe that the granules of chlorophyll were entirely independent of starch granules, although in many cases these latter were observable inside the granules of chlorophyll. Only in the early forties, Justus von Liebig realized that the assimilation of carbon and hydrogen required a series of chemical reactions that, starting from some organic acids, ended in the formation of sugar. In conclusion, our analysis does not lead to define this period as stagnation but rather as transition, in which the concept of photosynthesis was clear, even though difficult to treat under physiological and chemical views. From the sixties, the researches of Julius von Sachs will open a new road, thanks also to the research carried out in the transition period.
光合作用的曙光,以Priestley, Ingen- Housz和Senebier的研究为特征,在1804年thsamodore De Saussure的一篇历史论文中达到高潮。根据历史学家的说法,在细胞理论的起源开始的19世纪上半叶,光合作用的研究遇到了一个停滞阶段。事实上,这一时期的文献综述并没有报道特别的创新;然而,几位科学家(植物学家、生理学家和化学家)用一系列的分析来支持德索绪尔的论点,在我们看来,这些分析值得了解。Mirbel、De Candolle、Raspail、Berzelius、Payen、Dutrochet、von Mohl等学者试图扩展光合作用的知识,但未能得出一个与功能机制相一致的理论,也未能找到一个合适的化学模型来解释水和二氧化碳转化为糖的过程。这种不足的一个经典案例是叶绿素的发现。这种化合物于1818年由Pelletier和Caventou分离出来,多年来一直是一个谜,从未与淀粉的合成联系起来。冯·莫尔的精确研究使这位科学家相信叶绿素颗粒完全独立于淀粉颗粒,尽管在许多情况下,淀粉颗粒在叶绿素颗粒中是可以观察到的。直到四十年代初,李比希才意识到碳和氢的同化需要一系列的化学反应,从一些有机酸开始,最终形成糖。总之,我们的分析并没有导致将这一时期定义为停滞,而是一个过渡时期,在这个时期,光合作用的概念是清晰的,尽管在生理和化学观点下很难处理。从60年代开始,朱利叶斯·冯·萨克斯的研究将开辟一条新的道路,这也得益于在过渡时期进行的研究。
{"title":"Photosynthesis: From De Saussure To Liebig.","authors":"Sergio Pennazio","doi":"10.19272/201711402006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201711402006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dawn of photosynthesis, characterized by the research of Priestley, Ingen- Housz and Senebier, culminated in 1804 with a historical essay of Théodore De Saussure. According to the historians, during the first half of the nineteenth century in which the genesis of the cell theory started off, the research on photosynthesis met a phase of stagnation. Indeed, the literature review of the period does not report particular innovation; however, several scientists (botanists, physiologists, and chemists) supported the thesis of De Saussure with a series of analyses that, in our opinion, deserve to be known. Mirbel, De Candolle, Raspail, Berzelius, Payen, Dutrochet, von Mohl, and other scholars attempted to expand knowledge on photosynthesis but were not able to arrive at a theory that was consistent with a functional mechanism, nor with a suitable chemical model to explain the transformation of the water and carbon dioxide into sugars. A classic case of such inadequacy concerns the discovery of chlorophyll. This compound, isolated in 1818 by Pelletier and Caventou, remained an enigma for many years and was never put in relation with the synthesis of starch. The accurate research of von Mohl led this scientist to believe that the granules of chlorophyll were entirely independent of starch granules, although in many cases these latter were observable inside the granules of chlorophyll. Only in the early forties, Justus von Liebig realized that the assimilation of carbon and hydrogen required a series of chemical reactions that, starting from some organic acids, ended in the formation of sugar. In conclusion, our analysis does not lead to define this period as stagnation but rather as transition, in which the concept of photosynthesis was clear, even though difficult to treat under physiological and chemical views. From the sixties, the researches of Julius von Sachs will open a new road, thanks also to the research carried out in the transition period.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36036008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay responds to Peter T. Saunders's call to go Beyond the neo-Darwinist Paradigm. While there is much to commend in his analysis, especially his suggestion that the extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) may not go far enough, he leaves the question of whether this should involve mere revision or total replacement open. A historiographical review reveals significant problems stemming from certain positivist assumptions and commitments within neo-Darwinian orthodoxy and the EES over and above any scientific considerations. As such, mere tweaking of the existing paradigm or its extension will do little to remedy the intellectual prejudices currently plaguing it. A complete overhaul is suggested by applying the López Ontological Demarcation Design (LODD) principle with biology in a multidisciplinary, non-reductionist philosophical framework. Building on the concept of Organismic-Systems Biology (OSB), a component of General Systems Theory (GTS) associated with polymathic biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901-1972), and cosmic evolution (CE) proposed by UCLA philosopher John Elof Boodin (1869-1950), the outline of a new evolutionary synthesis is offered as a prolegomenon to further study and evaluation.
这篇文章回应了Peter T. Saunders关于超越新达尔文主义范式的呼吁。虽然他的分析有很多值得赞扬的地方,尤其是他提出的扩展进化综合(EES)可能还不够深入的建议,但他留下了一个问题,即这是否应该包括仅仅修改还是完全替换。一项史学回顾揭示了新达尔文正统学说和EES中某些实证主义假设和承诺所产生的重大问题,这些问题超出了任何科学考虑。因此,仅仅对现有范式进行调整或扩展,对纠正目前困扰着它的知识偏见几乎无济于事。通过在多学科、非还原论的哲学框架中应用López本体论划分设计(LODD)原则,建议进行彻底的检查。建立在生物系统生物学(OSB)的概念,一般系统论(GTS)的一个组成部分与多学者生物学家路德维希·冯·伯塔朗菲(1901-1972),和宇宙进化(CE)由加州大学洛杉矶分校哲学家约翰·埃洛夫·布丹(1869-1950)提出,一个新的进化综合的轮廓提供了一个进一步研究和评价的引子。
{"title":"Toward A New Evolutionary Synthesis.","authors":"Michael A Flannery","doi":"10.19272/201711402004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201711402004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay responds to Peter T. Saunders's call to go Beyond the neo-Darwinist Paradigm. While there is much to commend in his analysis, especially his suggestion that the extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) may not go far enough, he leaves the question of whether this should involve mere revision or total replacement open. A historiographical review reveals significant problems stemming from certain positivist assumptions and commitments within neo-Darwinian orthodoxy and the EES over and above any scientific considerations. As such, mere tweaking of the existing paradigm or its extension will do little to remedy the intellectual prejudices currently plaguing it. A complete overhaul is suggested by applying the López Ontological Demarcation Design (LODD) principle with biology in a multidisciplinary, non-reductionist philosophical framework. Building on the concept of Organismic-Systems Biology (OSB), a component of General Systems Theory (GTS) associated with polymathic biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901-1972), and cosmic evolution (CE) proposed by UCLA philosopher John Elof Boodin (1869-1950), the outline of a new evolutionary synthesis is offered as a prolegomenon to further study and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36036005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elisa Guidi, Patrizia Meringolo, Andrea Guazzini, Franco Bagnoli
Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been a well-studied problem in the past psychological literature, especially through its classical methodology such as qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. This article introduces two basic stochastic models as an alternative approach to simulate the short and long-term dynamics of a couple at risk of IPV. In both models, the members of the couple may assume a finite number of states, updating them in a probabilistic way at discrete time steps. After defining the transition probabilities, we first analyze the evolution of the couple in isolation and then we consider the case in which the individuals modify their behavior depending on the perceived violence from other couples in their environment or based on the perceived informal social support. While high perceived violence in other couples may converge toward the own presence of IPV by means a gender-specific transmission, the gender differences fade-out in the case of received informal social support. Despite the simplicity of the two stochastic models, they generate results which compare well with past experimental studies about IPV and they give important practical implications for prevention intervention in this field.
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence: A Stochastic Model.","authors":"Elisa Guidi, Patrizia Meringolo, Andrea Guazzini, Franco Bagnoli","doi":"10.19272/201711402005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201711402005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been a well-studied problem in the past psychological literature, especially through its classical methodology such as qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. This article introduces two basic stochastic models as an alternative approach to simulate the short and long-term dynamics of a couple at risk of IPV. In both models, the members of the couple may assume a finite number of states, updating them in a probabilistic way at discrete time steps. After defining the transition probabilities, we first analyze the evolution of the couple in isolation and then we consider the case in which the individuals modify their behavior depending on the perceived violence from other couples in their environment or based on the perceived informal social support. While high perceived violence in other couples may converge toward the own presence of IPV by means a gender-specific transmission, the gender differences fade-out in the case of received informal social support. Despite the simplicity of the two stochastic models, they generate results which compare well with past experimental studies about IPV and they give important practical implications for prevention intervention in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36036007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Description: The understanding of the factors governing the enzyme catalysis is one of the most important goals of biochemistry and biophysics. In this context the contribution of theoretical research might be of high relevance. However, despite the huge amount of proposed approaches, the modelling of enzyme reactions still represents a very difficult task and a definitive and conclusive theoretical-computational strategy is still far from being available. In this study, after a presentation of the main difficulties associated to a coherent and possibly rigorous modelling of these processes, we present a computational theoretical method specifically designed for addressing complex molecular systems eventually applied to a benchmark reaction: the initial proton transfer in Triosephosphate Isomerase. This latter species, termed as the 'perfect enzyme' because of its exceptional ability as catalyst, provides an excellent test for evaluating the different environmental and intrinsic determinants at the basis of enzyme activity.
{"title":"The Perfect Enzyme : Revisiting the Modelling of Initial Proton Transfer in Triosephosphate Isomerase.","authors":"Massimiliano Aschi, Andrea Amadei","doi":"10.19272/201611402002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201611402002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Description: </strong>The understanding of the factors governing the enzyme catalysis is one of the most important goals of biochemistry and biophysics. In this context the contribution of theoretical research might be of high relevance. However, despite the huge amount of proposed approaches, the modelling of enzyme reactions still represents a very difficult task and a definitive and conclusive theoretical-computational strategy is still far from being available. In this study, after a presentation of the main difficulties associated to a coherent and possibly rigorous modelling of these processes, we present a computational theoretical method specifically designed for addressing complex molecular systems eventually applied to a benchmark reaction: the initial proton transfer in Triosephosphate Isomerase. This latter species, termed as the 'perfect enzyme' because of its exceptional ability as catalyst, provides an excellent test for evaluating the different environmental and intrinsic determinants at the basis of enzyme activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35890338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Description: Ever since Darwin, there have been challenges to the claim that the natural selection of small random variations is a sufficient explanation of evolution. Even mainstream evolutionists are now beginning to accept that something more is required. The question is whether this will be merely a few add-ons that leave the paradigm unaltered, or whether the whole framework of explanation, including its application to other disciplines, will be changed.
{"title":"Beyond the neo-Darwinist paradigm.","authors":"Peter T Saunders","doi":"10.19272/201611402009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201611402009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Description: </strong>Ever since Darwin, there have been challenges to the claim that the natural selection of small random variations is a sufficient explanation of evolution. Even mainstream evolutionists are now beginning to accept that something more is required. The question is whether this will be merely a few add-ons that leave the paradigm unaltered, or whether the whole framework of explanation, including its application to other disciplines, will be changed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35890812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Description: A number of common features can be observed in the earliest developing embryos of all animal phyla. A simple extant model of morphogenesis is outlined here, with the aim of giving a model of the relatively rapid appearance of Cambrian animals, 541-515 mya. Developmental patterning, elucidated by a simple linear model with only short-range diffusion of ligands, is given as the origin of the most primitive animals. The key aspect of the model involves the interaction between the emergence of the Wnt and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathways. The non-canonical Wnt pathway is crucial in first establishing a sphere of cells, by way of cell-cell connection fi bers. A mutation in the Wnt pathway at the dawn of multicellular organisms is argued to have given rise to the early Hh pathway, and their interaction gives two spatially separate gene determination regions, the key goal of biological patterning.
{"title":"Early metazoan development: the origin of the Cambrian exuberance.","authors":"Fred W Cummings","doi":"10.19272/201611402005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201611402005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Description: </strong>A number of common features can be observed in the earliest developing embryos of all animal phyla. A simple extant model of morphogenesis is outlined here, with the aim of giving a model of the relatively rapid appearance of Cambrian animals, 541-515 mya. Developmental patterning, elucidated by a simple linear model with only short-range diffusion of ligands, is given as the origin of the most primitive animals. The key aspect of the model involves the interaction between the emergence of the Wnt and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathways. The non-canonical Wnt pathway is crucial in first establishing a sphere of cells, by way of cell-cell connection fi bers. A mutation in the Wnt pathway at the dawn of multicellular organisms is argued to have given rise to the early Hh pathway, and their interaction gives two spatially separate gene determination regions, the key goal of biological patterning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35890341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Description: The aim of this paper is a free interpretation and reconstruction of a part of Giovanni Virginio Schiaparelli's essay (1898) where the author presents some ideas about a correspondence between living organisms and geometrical curves. From our analysis we derive a new approach to the ago-antagonist conception of the Darwinian evolution theory which is a continuation of [2].
{"title":"A (historical) remark on the Darwin-Schiaparelli evolution theory.","authors":"Paolo Freguglia","doi":"10.19272/201611402006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201611402006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Description: </strong>The aim of this paper is a free interpretation and reconstruction of a part of Giovanni Virginio Schiaparelli's essay (1898) where the author presents some ideas about a correspondence between living organisms and geometrical curves. From our analysis we derive a new approach to the ago-antagonist conception of the Darwinian evolution theory which is a continuation of [2].</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35890809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}