Prostate最新文献

Purpose: To assess the early metabolic response of the primary tumor using Gallium-68 (⁶⁸Ga)-labeled-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT), as well as the relationship between PSMA change in the primary tumor and PSA response after definitive radiotherapy (RT), either alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa) patients.

Methods: The clinical data of 71 IR-PCa patients treated with RT alone (36 patients, 50.7%) or RT and ADT (35 patients, 49.3%) were retrospectively analyzed. The difference between pre- and Posttreatment primary tumor PSMA expression and serum PSA values measured 4 months after completion of treatment were compared between treatment arms. Correlation between primary tumor metabolic response and serum PSA changes was analyzed.

Results: The median duration between pre- and Posttreatment ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for the entire patient population was 6.9 months (range, 5.6-8.4 months), and it was similar in both treatment arms. A decrease in primary tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was seen in 66 patients (93.0%), with a median value of 61.2%, which is significantly lower in patients undergoing RT alone than those undergoing RT and ADT (45.1 ± 30.6% vs. 59.1 ± 24.7%; p = 0.004). The complete metabolic response rate was significantly higher in patients undergoing RT and ADT than those treated with RT alone (40% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Although moderate and positive correlation between pretreatment SUVmax and oosttreatment SUVmax was observed, there was no significant correlation between SUV change and PSA change. For patients treated with RT and ADT, posttreatment SUVmax was significantly lower and SUV change was significantly higher in patients with PSA nadir than in those without.

Conclusions: Our preliminary results show that RT, with or without ADT, significantly reduces primary tumor SUVmax and serum PSA levels. Nonetheless, our findings indicate that early treatment response using ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT is not feasible for those treated with RT alone, and it may only be useful in better distinguishing patients with and without PSA nadir for those who received both RT and ADT.

Background: To analyze the expression of interleukin-33 (IL-33), growth-stimulated expression gene 2 (ST2), nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) and immune cell infiltration in prostate cancer, this study aims to provide an experimental basis for the clinical prevention and treatment of prostate cancer.

Methods: The expression of IL-33 in PCa tissues was analyzed using TCGA, TIMER and HPA databases. Using the UALCAN database, the systematic exploration of the relationship between IL-33 and various clinicopathological parameters was conducted. The correlation between IL-33 expression and immune cell infiltration was investigated using TIMER, CIBERSORT and GEPIA databases. To verify these analyses, 22 cases of normal prostate (NP), 76 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 100 cases of PCa were recruited. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to examine the expression of IL-33, ST2, NF-κB, and the infiltration of immune cells. Correlations between these factors were then determined.

Results: The expression of IL-33, ST2 and NF-κB was significantly lower in PCa tissues compared with NP (p < 0.05). IL-33 was not associated with age in PCa but showed associations with race, molecular characteristics, lymph node metastatic status, TP53 mutation and tumor grade. Furthermore, IL-33 was associated with immune cell infiltration. Positive correlations were observed between IL-33 and ST2 expressions, as well as between IL-33 and CD68⁺ macrophages in BPH and PCa.

Conclusions: IL-33, ST2 and NF-κB are lowly expressed in PCa tissues, their expression decreases with the increasing malignancy of cancer. IL-33, ST2 and NF-κB are factors associated with PCa immune infiltration. IL-33 has an inhibitory effect on prostate cancer through the IL-33/ST2/NF-κB signalling pathway.

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States with low survival rates once metastasized. Abiraterone is approved for use in castrate-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer and is used extensively in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. Spironolactone, a diuretic used to treat heart failure, edema, ascites, and hypertension, may increase androgen levels and reduce effectiveness of abiraterone when used concurrently to treat prostate cancer patients. While previous case studies support this, no large epidemiology studies have been conducted. The current study utilizes the large, VA prostate cancer data core and evaluates the effect of concomitant spironolactone on efficacy of abiraterone treatment in metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Patients and methods: The study selected 18,943 veterans with metastatic prostate cancer on abiraterone treatment. Of these, 581 patients (3.1%) were also on concomitant spironolactone. The concomitant treatment group, abiraterone + spironolactone, significantly differed from the abiraterone-only group in body mass index, prevalence rates of heart failure and liver disease, and being previously treated with docetaxel. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to balance sample sizes and baseline traits between the two treatment groups, abiraterone versus abiraterone + spironolactone. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare 5-year overall survival and all-cause mortality outcomes, respectively, between the two groups.

Results: After propensity score matched, the abiraterone + spironolactone group was treated with abiraterone significantly longer than the abiraterone-only group (mean ± standard deviation days 549.0 ± 552.3 vs. 435.5 ± 474.1; p = 0.0002) and had a higher 5-year overall survival rate (44% vs. 37%; p = 0.0116). Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer treated with abiraterone + spironolactone also had a lower 5-year all-cause mortality compared to those only on abiraterone (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence intervals 0.61-0.96; p = 0.012).

Conclusion: This large VA observational study suggests that concomitant use of spironolactone does not compromise cancer control or survival of metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone.

Background: This study explored the value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) in predicting the efficacy of abiraterone treatment in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients.

Methods: A retrospective study of 925 patients who underwent prostate biopsies to detect IDC-P was conducted, with participants divided into two cohorts. The first cohort of 165 mHSPC patients receiving abiraterone treatment was analyzed to compare therapeutic effectiveness between IDC-P positive and negative cases. Utilizing propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias, outcomes such as PSA response, progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival were assessed. Additionally, the second cohort of 760 mHSPC patients compared the efficacy of abiraterone with conventional hormone therapy, focusing on differences between IDC-P positive and negative individuals.

Results: After PSM, our first cohort included 108 patients with similar baseline characteristics. Among them, 50% (54/108) were diagnosed with IDC-P, with 22.2% (12/54) having IDC-P pattern 1 and 77.8% (42/54) with IDC-P pattern 2. While no notable difference was seen in PSA responses between IDC-P positive and negative patients, IDC-P presence linked to worse clinical outcomes (PSA-PFS: 18.6 months vs. not reached [NR], p = 0.009; rPFS: 23.6 months vs. NR, p = 0.020). Further analysis showed comparable outcomes for IDC-P pattern 1 but significantly worse prognosis for IDC-P pattern 2 (PSA-PFS: 18.6 months vs. NR, p = 0.002; rPFS: 22.4 months vs. NR, p = 0.010). Subgroup analysis revealed IDC-P pattern 2 consistently predicted poorer outcomes across patient subgroups. Remarkably, both IDC-P positive and negative patients gained more from androgen deprivation therapy with abiraterone than conventional treatment, with IDC-P negative patients showing a more significant survival advantage, supported by better hazard ratios (0.47 and 0.66).

Conclusion: This study found that IDC-P, especially pattern 2, predicts poor prognosis in mHSPC patients on abiraterone therapy. Also, abiraterone's advantage over hormone therapy is reduced in cases with IDC-P compared to those without.

Background: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men are at higher risk both for incidence and mortality from prostate cancer (PCa) compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) men, but these findings arise from biopsy-detected PCa reports. We aimed to compare the incidence, subsequent management and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of incidental PCa among NHB and NHW men, using two different North American cohorts.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER: 2004-2017) and our institutional Henry Ford Health (HFH: 1995-2022) databases were queried to identify men diagnosed with incidental PCa. Cumulative incidence estimates were used to calculate CSM differences between NHB and NHW men. Competing-risk multivariable regression analysis tested the impact of race on CSM, after accounting for all available covariates.

Results: A total of 418 and 6,124 incidental PCa cases were recorded in HFH and SEER database respectively. No pathological differences were observed between NHB and NHW men in both the cohorts, except for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at diagnosis, which was higher in NHB men. At 10-years, the CSM rates were 5.5% vs 7.2% in our cohort and 8.6% vs 10.3% in the SEER cohort for NHW and NHB men, respectively (all Gray's test p-value > 0.05). At multivariable, race was not an independent predictor of CSM in our HFH cohort (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.57-3.71, p = 0.6). In the SEER cohort, NHB men were 34% less likely to die from PCa from 1 year to the next (95% CI: 0.49-0.90, p = 0.008), when compared with NHW men.

Conclusions: In the comparison of incidental PCa findings between NHB and NHW men, both groups had similar pathological characteristic and survival outcomes. These findings are different from the 'conventional' screening-detected PCa and suggest that racial differences have minimal to no adverse effects on PCa-specific mortality after incidental diagnosis.

Objective: To quantify the differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) between high-grade (Gleason sum 8-10) incidental prostate cancer (IPCa) patients and age-matched male population-based controls, according to treatment type: no active versus active treatment.

Materials and methods: We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015) to identify not actively treated and actively treated high-grade IPCa patients. For each case, we simulated an age-matched male control (Monte Carlo simulation), relying on Social Security Administration Life Tables (2004-2020) with 5 years of follow-up. Additionally, we relied on Kaplan-Meier plots to display OS for each treatment type. Multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to predict overall mortality (OM).

Results: Of 564 high-grade IPCa patients, 345 (61%) were not actively treated versus 219 (39%) were actively treated, either with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Median OS was 3 years for not actively treated high-grade IPCa patients, with OS difference at 5 years follow-up of 27% relative to their age-matched male population-based controls (37% vs. 64%). Median OS was 8 years for actively treated high-grade IPCa patients, with OS difference at 5 years follow-up of 6% relative to their age-matched male population-based controls (68% vs. 74%). In the multivariable Cox regression model, active treatment independently predicted lower OM (hazard ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.4-0.8; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Relative to Life Tables' derived age-matched male controls, not actively treated high-grade IPCa patients exhibit drastically worse OS than their actively treated counterparts. These observations may encourage clinicians to consider active treatment in newly diagnosed high-grade IPCa patients.

Backgrounds: SWI/SNF complexes represent a family of multi-subunit chromatin remodelers that are affected by alterations in >20% of human tumors. While mutations of SWI/SNF genes are relatively uncommon in prostate cancer (PCa), the literature suggests that deregulation of various subunits plays a role in prostate tumorigenesis. To assess SWI/SNF functions in a clinical context, we studied the mutually exclusive, paralogue accessory subunits SMARCD1, SMARCD2, and SMARCD3 that are included in every known complex and are sought to confer specificity.

Methods: Performing immunohistochemistry (IHC), the protein levels of the SMARCD family members were measured using a tissue microarray (TMA) comprising malignant samples and matching healthy tissue of non-metastatic PCa patients (n = 168). Moreover, IHC was performed in castration-resistant tumors (n = 9) and lymph node metastases (n = 22). To assess their potential role as molecular biomarkers, SMARCD1 and SMARCD3 protein levels were correlated with clinical parameters such as T stage, Gleason score, biochemical recurrence, and progression-free survival.

Results: SMARCD1 protein levels in non-metastatic primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and castration-resistant samples were significantly higher than in benign tissues. Likewise, SMARCD3 protein expression was elevated in tumor tissue and especially lymph node metastases compared to benign samples. While SMARCD1 levels in primary tumors did not exhibit significant associations with any of the tested clinical parameters, SMARCD3 exhibited an inverse correlation with pre-operative PSA levels. Moreover, low SMARCD3 expression was associated with progression to metastasis.

Conclusions: In congruence with previous literature, our results implicate that both SMARCD1 and SMARCD3 may exhibit relevant functions in the context of prostate tumorigenesis. Moreover, our approach suggests a potential role of SMARCD3 as a novel prognostic marker in clinically non-metastatic PCa.

Background: The E-cadherin, α- and β-Catenin interaction at the cell adherens junction plays a key role in cell adhesion; alteration in the expression and function of these genes are associated with disease progression in several solid tumors including prostate cancer. The membranous β-Catenin is dynamically linked to the cellular cytoskeleton through interaction with α-Catenin at amino acid positions threonine 120 (T120) to 151 of β-Catenin. Nuclear presence of α-Catenin modulates the sensitivity of cells to DNA damage. The objective of this study is to determine the role of α-Catenin and protein kinase D1 (PrKD1) in DNA damage response.

Methods: Prostate cancer cells; LNCaP, LNCaP (Sh-PrKD1; silenced PrKD1), C4-2 and C4-2 PrKD1 were used for various sets of experiments to determine the role of DNA damage in PrKD1 overexpression and silencing cells. These cells were treated with compound-10 (100 nM) and Etoposide (30 µM), total cell lysates, cytosolic and nuclear fractions were prepared to observe various protein expressions. We performed single cell gel electrophoresis (COMET assay) to determine the etoposide induce DNA damage in C4-2 and C4-2 PrKD1 cells. The animal experiments were carried out to determine the tolerability of compound-10 by mice and generate preliminary data on efficacy of compound-10 in modulating the α-Catenin and PrKD1 expressions in inhibiting tumor progression.

Results: PrKD1, a novel serine threonine kinase, phosphorylates β-Catenin T120. In silico analysis, confirmed that T120 phosphorylation alters β- to α-Catenin binding. Forced expression of PrKD1 in prostate cancer cells increased β- and α-Catenin protein levels associated with reduced etoposide induced DNA damage. Downregulation of α-Catenin abrogates the PrKD1 mitigation of DNA damage. The in vitro results were corroborated in vivo using mouse prostate cancer patient derived xenograft model by inhibition of PrKD1 kinase activity with compound-10, a selective PrKD inhibitor, demonstrating decreased total β- and α-Catenin protein levels, and β-Catenin T120 phosphorylation.

Conclusions: Alteration in DNA damage response pathways play major role in prostate cancer progression. The study identifies a novel mechanism of α-Catenin dependent DNA damage mitigation role for PrKD1 in prostate cancer.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the differential efficacy and safety of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in a real-world practice setting.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consequent 668 patients with mHSPC treated with ARPI plus androgen deprivation therapy between September 2015 and December 2023. Based on the LATITUDE criteria, the comparison among abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide was exclusively conducted in high-risk patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses such as the achievement of 95% and 99% PSA decline, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were compared. All two-group comparisons relied on propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize the effect on possible confounders.

Results: In total, 297 patients with high-risk mHSPC treated with abiraterone, 127 with enzalutamide, and 142 with apalutamide were compared. There were no differences in time to CRPC (p = 0.13), OS (p = 0.7), and CSS (p = 0.5) among the three ARPIs. No differences were observed in the achievement rates for 95% PSA decline at 3 months among the three ARPIs, while abiraterone was significantly better in 99% PSA decline achievement compared to apalutamide (72% vs. 57%, p = 0.003). The aforementioned oncologic outcomes were sustained even when performing PSM analyzes. Although skin rash for APA (34%) was the highest incidence of AEs, there were no differences in the rates of severe AEs across the three ARPIs. Enzalutamide resulted in the lowest treatment discontinuation rates (10%) other than disease progression compared to the other regimens.

Conclusions: Abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide have comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of OS, CSS, and time to CRPC in patients with high-risk mHSPC. Our data on differential treatment discontinuation rates, PSA response, and AE profiles can help guide clinical decision-making.

Background: Surgical management options for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hypertension have remained limited in prostates of large volume. The advent of the Aquablation has created a potential minimally invasive option for treatment in prostates of all volumes. Thus, this study aims to evaluate outcomes and complications of Aquablation in clinical practice based on prostate volume.

Methods: Collected variables included adverse events with Clavien-Dindo classifications, transfusion rates, surgical retreatment rates, continued medication use postoperatively, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) with Quality-of-Life indicator. Aquablations were stratified by preoperative prostate volume.

Results: One hundred seventy-four men were included in the study. The average postop decrease in IPSS was 10.28, with a 2.02 point decrease in Quality-of-Life at 1 year. Postop increase in peak urinary flow rate was 7.65 mL/s for an average of 16.44 mL/s. Hemoglobin drop average was 1.78 g/dL, but only 2.3% of patients required a transfusion. 12.9% of patients required surgical retreatment. Six months after Aquablation, 22.9% and 12.9% of patients continued taking Alpha-blockers and Androgen receptor inhibitors, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 33 patients (19.0%). Eighteen patients were excluded from secondary analysis due to unrecorded prostate volume, leaving 123 with volumes <150 mL and 33 with volumes ≥150 mL. Groups were comparable with respect to length of stay, adverse events, blood transfusion, IPSS with Quality-of-Life indicator preoperative and postoperative, postop peak urinary flow, and postop alpha-blocker use. Larger prostates had a higher rate of adverse events, retreatment, postop hemoglobin drop, and postop use of finasteride.

Conclusions: Aquablation is a viable treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Efficacy, safety, subjective outcomes, and adverse event rates were not impacted by prostate volume. However, size does matter as prostates ≥150 mL had higher surgical retreatment rates and postop finasteride use.