首页 > 最新文献

Prostate最新文献

英文 中文
Deciphering Resistance: Beyond the Androgen Paradigm; Report From the 2025 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting. 解读抵抗:超越雄激素范式2025年科菲-霍尔顿前列腺癌学会会议报告。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70102
Tanya Stoyanova, Saul J Priceman, Ashley E Ross, Phuoc T Tran, Rana R McKay, Kenneth J Pienta, Howard R Soule, Andrea K Miyahira

Introduction: The 12th Annual 2025 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, "Deciphering Resistance: Beyond the Androgen Paradigm," was held at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Luskin Conference Center, in Los Angeles, CA, from June 19 to 22, 2025.

Methods: The CHPCA Meeting is a discussion-focused conference held annually by the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF), for in-depth academic analysis of emerging research with the greatest potential to drive new understandings and treatments for prostate cancer. The 2025 CHPCA Meeting included attendance by 79 academic investigators and 39 talks over 8 sessions.

Results: The session topics included: drug discovery in academia, non-apoptotic cell death mechanisms, understanding and overcoming treatment resistance, chromosomal instability (CIN) as a driver of metastasis and treatment resistance, targeting metastatic sites, immunotherapy sensitizers, and optimizing therapy delivery and biomedical engineering.

Discussion: This meeting report summarizes the presentations from the 2025 CHPCA Meeting. We hope that disseminating this information will directly contribute to novel research efforts and improved treatment strategies for patients with prostate cancer.

简介:2025年6月19日至22日,第12届科菲-霍尔顿前列腺癌学会(CHPCA)年会在加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)的卢斯金会议中心举行,会议主题为“破译抵抗:超越雄激素范式”。方法:CHPCA会议是由前列腺癌基金会(PCF)每年举办的以讨论为重点的会议,对最有可能推动前列腺癌新认识和新治疗的新兴研究进行深入的学术分析。2025年CHPCA会议共有79位学术研究者参加,共进行了8场39场演讲。结果:会议主题包括:学术界的药物发现,非凋亡细胞死亡机制,理解和克服治疗耐药,染色体不稳定性(CIN)作为转移和治疗耐药的驱动因素,靶向转移部位,免疫治疗增敏剂,优化治疗递送和生物医学工程。讨论:本会议报告总结了2025年CHPCA会议的发言。我们希望传播这些信息将直接有助于新的研究工作和改进前列腺癌患者的治疗策略。
{"title":"Deciphering Resistance: Beyond the Androgen Paradigm; Report From the 2025 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.","authors":"Tanya Stoyanova, Saul J Priceman, Ashley E Ross, Phuoc T Tran, Rana R McKay, Kenneth J Pienta, Howard R Soule, Andrea K Miyahira","doi":"10.1002/pros.70102","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 12th Annual 2025 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, \"Deciphering Resistance: Beyond the Androgen Paradigm,\" was held at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Luskin Conference Center, in Los Angeles, CA, from June 19 to 22, 2025.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CHPCA Meeting is a discussion-focused conference held annually by the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF), for in-depth academic analysis of emerging research with the greatest potential to drive new understandings and treatments for prostate cancer. The 2025 CHPCA Meeting included attendance by 79 academic investigators and 39 talks over 8 sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The session topics included: drug discovery in academia, non-apoptotic cell death mechanisms, understanding and overcoming treatment resistance, chromosomal instability (CIN) as a driver of metastasis and treatment resistance, targeting metastatic sites, immunotherapy sensitizers, and optimizing therapy delivery and biomedical engineering.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This meeting report summarizes the presentations from the 2025 CHPCA Meeting. We hope that disseminating this information will directly contribute to novel research efforts and improved treatment strategies for patients with prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"411-427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cystoscopic ICG-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study. 膀胱镜下心电图引导下前哨淋巴结清扫在机器人前列腺根治术中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70107
Yi Hong Li, Yu Feng Chuang, Yen Chuan Ou, Yi Sheng Lin, Li Hua Huang, Wei Chun Weng, Chao Yu Hsu, Min Che Tung

Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, procedural feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a novel cystoscopic-guided indocyanine green (ICG) injection technique followed by fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP), hereafter referred to as CysICG-SLND.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-cT3, cN0) scheduled for RaRP between November 2019 and May 2020. Each patient received cystoscopic-guided intraprostatic injections of ICG, with injection volumes tailored according to prostate size. SLND was performed using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System equipped with near-infrared imaging and followed by a routine extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Diagnostic accuracy, procedural complications, and medium-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 34 patients were included (risk category: low = 2, intermediate = 11, high = 21). Cystoscopic ICG injection was technically successful in all cases. The overall fluorescence detection rate was 97.1%, with excellent per-patient sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (100%) across all patients. However, per-node diagnostic performance was moderate (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 47.8%). Notably, in the high-risk group, per-node performance was modest, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV of 66.7%, 55.2%, 20.5%, and 90.7%, respectively. No metastatic nodes were identified in low-risk and intermediate-risk groups, demonstrating a reliable 100% NPV in these subpopulations. High-risk patients had significantly higher biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates compared to lower-risk groups (p = 0.017). There were no allergic reactions or postoperative complications attributable to ICG.

Conclusions: CysICG-SLND is a feasible, accurate approach for nodal staging in prostate cancer, particularly beneficial in low- to intermediate-risk groups, achieving excellent sensitivity and NPV. Although diagnostic performance is limited in high-risk patients, high per-patient accuracy still supports clinical utility. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these results and further elucidate the technique's clinical role.

背景:为了评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RaRP)中新型膀胱镜引导下吲吲青绿(ICG)注射技术随后荧光引导前哨淋巴结清扫(SLND)的诊断准确性、程序可行性和临床结果,以下简称CysICG-SLND。方法:前瞻性纳入2019年11月至2020年5月期间计划接受RaRP治疗的临床局限性前列腺癌(cT1-cT3, cN0)患者。每位患者均接受膀胱镜引导下的前列腺内注射ICG,注射量根据前列腺大小定制。使用配备近红外成像的达芬奇Xi手术系统进行SLND,随后进行常规扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫(ePLND)。分析了诊断准确性、手术并发症和中期肿瘤预后。结果:共纳入34例患者(低危= 2,中危= 11,高危= 21)。膀胱镜下ICG注射在技术上均成功。总体荧光检出率为97.1%,在所有患者中均具有出色的每位患者敏感性(100%)和阴性预测值(NPV)(100%)。然而,每个节点的诊断表现中等(敏感性66.7%,特异性47.8%)。值得注意的是,在高危组中,每个节点的表现一般,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和NPV分别为66.7%、55.2%、20.5%和90.7%。在低危和中危人群中未发现转移性淋巴结,这表明在这些亚群中有可靠的100% NPV。高危组生化复发率(BCR)明显高于低危组(p = 0.017)。无ICG引起的过敏反应及术后并发症。结论:CysICG-SLND是一种可行、准确的前列腺癌淋巴结分期方法,尤其适用于低至中危人群,具有优异的敏感性和NPV。虽然诊断性能在高危患者是有限的,高每病人的准确性仍然支持临床应用。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些结果,并进一步阐明该技术的临床作用。
{"title":"Cystoscopic ICG-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Yi Hong Li, Yu Feng Chuang, Yen Chuan Ou, Yi Sheng Lin, Li Hua Huang, Wei Chun Weng, Chao Yu Hsu, Min Che Tung","doi":"10.1002/pros.70107","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, procedural feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a novel cystoscopic-guided indocyanine green (ICG) injection technique followed by fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP), hereafter referred to as CysICG-SLND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-cT3, cN0) scheduled for RaRP between November 2019 and May 2020. Each patient received cystoscopic-guided intraprostatic injections of ICG, with injection volumes tailored according to prostate size. SLND was performed using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System equipped with near-infrared imaging and followed by a routine extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Diagnostic accuracy, procedural complications, and medium-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 patients were included (risk category: low = 2, intermediate = 11, high = 21). Cystoscopic ICG injection was technically successful in all cases. The overall fluorescence detection rate was 97.1%, with excellent per-patient sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (100%) across all patients. However, per-node diagnostic performance was moderate (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 47.8%). Notably, in the high-risk group, per-node performance was modest, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV of 66.7%, 55.2%, 20.5%, and 90.7%, respectively. No metastatic nodes were identified in low-risk and intermediate-risk groups, demonstrating a reliable 100% NPV in these subpopulations. High-risk patients had significantly higher biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates compared to lower-risk groups (p = 0.017). There were no allergic reactions or postoperative complications attributable to ICG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CysICG-SLND is a feasible, accurate approach for nodal staging in prostate cancer, particularly beneficial in low- to intermediate-risk groups, achieving excellent sensitivity and NPV. Although diagnostic performance is limited in high-risk patients, high per-patient accuracy still supports clinical utility. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these results and further elucidate the technique's clinical role.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"481-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145821727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Happening in the Prostate Tumor Microenvironment: Ion Channels and Extrachromosomal DNA Driving Phenotypic Plasticity. 发生在前列腺肿瘤微环境:离子通道和染色体外DNA驱动表型可塑性。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70139
Sara Darbandi, Alfonso Urbanucci, Sini Hakkola, Juanita Gujral, Mahsa Darbandi, Ahmed Eraky, Sujit Nair, Goutam Chakraborty, Ashutosh Tewari, Natasha Kyprianou

Background: Plasticity of cancer, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal, and microenvironmental adaptation, drives metastasis, therapy resistance, and poor outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). Ion channels and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) have emerged as key drivers of such adaptive processes by influencing signaling, metabolism, and immune interactions.

Methods: We evaluated available evidence on ion channel biology, ecDNA dynamics, and their roles in tumor plasticity and drug resistance in PCa. Further, we analyzed two publicly accessible single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets (primary PCa and castration-resistant PCa) to determine ion channel and transporter expression profiles in tumor and stromal cell populations.

Results: Our analysis showed cell type-specific expression of many ion channels, including KCNJ10, CACNA1H, and CLIC1, and identification of six transporters (SLC25A1, SLC25A10, SLC25A33, SLC25A42, SLC29A2, SLC7A11) strongly enriched in luminal tumor cells. The discovered genes regulate mitochondrial metabolism, redox homeostasis, nucleotide biosynthesis, immune modulation, and resistance to ferroptosis, all contributing to tumor growth. ecDNA facilitates oncogene amplification (e.g., MYC, EGFR), induction of EMT, and immune evasion, driving intratumoral heterogeneity and therapy-resistant clones.

Conclusions: Ion channels and ecDNA are central to the disease progression and treatment resistance of PCa through regulation of EMT, CSC phenotype, and tumor microenvironment (TME) interactions. Targeting the drivers-through ion channel modulators, ferroptosis induction, and ecDNA-targeting interventions (BET/HDAC inhibitors, CRISPR-based methods) offers a promising way to overcome resistance. Integration of multi-omics, and combination treatments will be key to construct precision medicine strategies and improve clinical outcomes in advanced PCa.

背景:癌症的可塑性,包括上皮-间质转化(EMT)、癌症干细胞(CSC)自我更新和微环境适应,驱动前列腺癌(PCa)的转移、治疗抵抗和不良预后。离子通道和染色体外DNA (ecDNA)通过影响信号、代谢和免疫相互作用而成为这种适应性过程的关键驱动因素。方法:我们评估了离子通道生物学、ecDNA动力学及其在前列腺癌肿瘤可塑性和耐药中的作用。此外,我们分析了两个可公开获取的单细胞rna测序(scRNA-seq)数据集(原发PCa和去势抵抗PCa),以确定肿瘤和基质细胞群体中的离子通道和转运体表达谱。结果:我们的分析显示了KCNJ10、CACNA1H和CLIC1等多种离子通道的细胞类型特异性表达,并鉴定了6种转运体(SLC25A1、SLC25A10、SLC25A33、SLC25A42、SLC29A2、SLC7A11)在腔内肿瘤细胞中强烈富集。发现的基因调节线粒体代谢、氧化还原稳态、核苷酸生物合成、免疫调节和对铁凋亡的抵抗,所有这些都有助于肿瘤的生长。ecDNA促进癌基因扩增(如MYC, EGFR),诱导EMT和免疫逃避,驱动肿瘤内异质性和治疗耐药克隆。结论:离子通道和ecDNA通过调节EMT、CSC表型和肿瘤微环境(TME)相互作用,对PCa的疾病进展和治疗耐药起着核心作用。靶向驱动因子-通过离子通道调节剂,铁凋亡诱导和ecdna靶向干预(BET/HDAC抑制剂,基于crispr的方法)提供了一种有希望的方法来克服耐药性。整合多组学和联合治疗将是构建精准医疗策略和提高晚期前列腺癌临床疗效的关键。
{"title":"Happening in the Prostate Tumor Microenvironment: Ion Channels and Extrachromosomal DNA Driving Phenotypic Plasticity.","authors":"Sara Darbandi, Alfonso Urbanucci, Sini Hakkola, Juanita Gujral, Mahsa Darbandi, Ahmed Eraky, Sujit Nair, Goutam Chakraborty, Ashutosh Tewari, Natasha Kyprianou","doi":"10.1002/pros.70139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasticity of cancer, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal, and microenvironmental adaptation, drives metastasis, therapy resistance, and poor outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). Ion channels and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) have emerged as key drivers of such adaptive processes by influencing signaling, metabolism, and immune interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated available evidence on ion channel biology, ecDNA dynamics, and their roles in tumor plasticity and drug resistance in PCa. Further, we analyzed two publicly accessible single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets (primary PCa and castration-resistant PCa) to determine ion channel and transporter expression profiles in tumor and stromal cell populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis showed cell type-specific expression of many ion channels, including KCNJ10, CACNA1H, and CLIC1, and identification of six transporters (SLC25A1, SLC25A10, SLC25A33, SLC25A42, SLC29A2, SLC7A11) strongly enriched in luminal tumor cells. The discovered genes regulate mitochondrial metabolism, redox homeostasis, nucleotide biosynthesis, immune modulation, and resistance to ferroptosis, all contributing to tumor growth. ecDNA facilitates oncogene amplification (e.g., MYC, EGFR), induction of EMT, and immune evasion, driving intratumoral heterogeneity and therapy-resistant clones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ion channels and ecDNA are central to the disease progression and treatment resistance of PCa through regulation of EMT, CSC phenotype, and tumor microenvironment (TME) interactions. Targeting the drivers-through ion channel modulators, ferroptosis induction, and ecDNA-targeting interventions (BET/HDAC inhibitors, CRISPR-based methods) offers a promising way to overcome resistance. Integration of multi-omics, and combination treatments will be key to construct precision medicine strategies and improve clinical outcomes in advanced PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward a Modern Telehealth Follow-Up Routine for Radical Prostatectomy: Introducing a Novel E-Health Application for Outcome and Complication Assessment. 迈向根治性前列腺切除术的现代远程医疗随访常规:介绍一种用于结果和并发症评估的新型电子健康应用。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70140
Nora Bauer, Christian Daniel Fankhauser, Silvan Sigg, Ernest Kaufmann, Andres Affentranger, Fabian Aschwanden, Simone Müller, Brigitte Hofstetter, Philipp Baumeister, Nico Grossmann, Agostino Mattei, Christoph Würnschimmel

Background: To implement "MeinLUKS," an automated e-health follow-up system within the EPIC MyChart portal after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to examine factors influencing portal adoption, as well as functional and oncological outcome differences between users and non-users.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed men undergoing RP at a tertiary center (January/2022-October/2023). Patients were classified as "users" if they submitted follow-up data via MeinLUKS or "non-users" if monitored through referring physicians. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional, and oncological outcomes were retrieved from institutional registries and included standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Both groups were invited to structured telephone interviews addressing barriers and facilitators of adoption.

Results: Of 274 patients, 128 (47%) used MeinLUKS and 146 (53%) relied on traditional follow-up. Users were younger, more educated, and often urban residents, while oncological characteristics were comparable. Median time to no pad use was not different (11 vs. 28 days, p = 0.3) with similar long-term continence (79% vs. 73% pad-free, p = 0.3). Patient reported sexual function recovery was better among users (56% vs. 36%, p = 0.01). MeinLUKS automatically flagged two biochemical recurrences and unreported complications not identified in routine care. Among 91 interviewees, users emphasized organizational benefits and digital competence, while non-users cited poor onboarding, limited physician advocacy, and interface complexity. Limitations include single-center, retrospective design and non-randomized comparisons.

Conclusions: Automated e-health follow-up improved data completeness, reduced workforce demands, and detected clinically relevant events missed in routine care. Optimizing onboarding, clinician engagement, and usability may increase adoption and enhance quality and efficiency in prostate cancer survivorship care.

背景:在EPIC MyChart门户网站中实施“MeinLUKS”,这是一个根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的自动电子健康随访系统,并研究影响门户网站采用的因素,以及用户和非用户之间的功能和肿瘤结果差异。方法:我们回顾性分析了在三级中心(2022年1月- 2023年10月)接受RP的男性。如果患者通过MeinLUKS提交随访数据,则将其归类为“用户”;如果通过转诊医生进行监测,则将其归类为“非用户”。社会人口学、临床、功能和肿瘤学结果从机构登记中检索,包括标准化的患者报告的结果测量。两个小组都被邀请进行结构化的电话访谈,讨论收养的障碍和促进因素。结果:274例患者中,128例(47%)使用MeinLUKS, 146例(53%)依赖传统随访。使用者更年轻,受教育程度更高,通常是城市居民,而肿瘤特征具有可比性。到不使用尿垫的中位时间(11天对28天,p = 0.3)与类似的长期尿失禁(79%对73%不使用尿垫,p = 0.3)没有差异。患者报告的性功能恢复在使用者中更好(56%比36%,p = 0.01)。MeinLUKS自动标记两种生化复发和未报告的并发症,这些并发症在常规护理中未被发现。在91名受访者中,用户强调了组织效益和数字能力,而非用户则提到了较差的新人培训、有限的医生宣传和界面复杂性。局限性包括单中心、回顾性设计和非随机比较。结论:自动化电子卫生随访提高了数据完整性,减少了劳动力需求,并发现了常规护理中遗漏的临床相关事件。优化入职、临床医生参与和可用性可以提高前列腺癌生存护理的采用率,提高质量和效率。
{"title":"Toward a Modern Telehealth Follow-Up Routine for Radical Prostatectomy: Introducing a Novel E-Health Application for Outcome and Complication Assessment.","authors":"Nora Bauer, Christian Daniel Fankhauser, Silvan Sigg, Ernest Kaufmann, Andres Affentranger, Fabian Aschwanden, Simone Müller, Brigitte Hofstetter, Philipp Baumeister, Nico Grossmann, Agostino Mattei, Christoph Würnschimmel","doi":"10.1002/pros.70140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To implement \"MeinLUKS,\" an automated e-health follow-up system within the EPIC MyChart portal after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to examine factors influencing portal adoption, as well as functional and oncological outcome differences between users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed men undergoing RP at a tertiary center (January/2022-October/2023). Patients were classified as \"users\" if they submitted follow-up data via MeinLUKS or \"non-users\" if monitored through referring physicians. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional, and oncological outcomes were retrieved from institutional registries and included standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Both groups were invited to structured telephone interviews addressing barriers and facilitators of adoption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 274 patients, 128 (47%) used MeinLUKS and 146 (53%) relied on traditional follow-up. Users were younger, more educated, and often urban residents, while oncological characteristics were comparable. Median time to no pad use was not different (11 vs. 28 days, p = 0.3) with similar long-term continence (79% vs. 73% pad-free, p = 0.3). Patient reported sexual function recovery was better among users (56% vs. 36%, p = 0.01). MeinLUKS automatically flagged two biochemical recurrences and unreported complications not identified in routine care. Among 91 interviewees, users emphasized organizational benefits and digital competence, while non-users cited poor onboarding, limited physician advocacy, and interface complexity. Limitations include single-center, retrospective design and non-randomized comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated e-health follow-up improved data completeness, reduced workforce demands, and detected clinically relevant events missed in routine care. Optimizing onboarding, clinician engagement, and usability may increase adoption and enhance quality and efficiency in prostate cancer survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adapting the Bellmunt Risk Score for Prognostic Stratification in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. 在转移性去势敏感前列腺癌中采用bellmont风险评分进行预后分层。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70062
Satı Coşkun Yazgan, Hatice Bölek, Muharrem Coşkunpınar, Emre Yekedüz, Yüksel Ürün

Background: The management of mCSPC has improved with the addition of docetaxel and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) to androgen deprivation therapy. However, patient outcomes remain heterogeneous, highlighting the need for practical prognostic models. The Bellmunt risk score, based on ECOG status, hemoglobin, and liver metastases, was developed for urothelial carcinoma, but its role in mCSPC is unclear.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 182 mCSPC patients treated with first-line docetaxel or ARPi from 2010 to 2024. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups by the Bellmunt score. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Subgroup and interaction analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of the Bellmunt risk score's prognostic value across treatment modalities. The Bellmunt, CHAARTED, and LATITUDE criteria were compared using the concordance index (C-index).

Results: Patients with a low Bellmunt risk score had significantly longer OS than high-risk patients (median OS: 44.4 vs. 14.1 months; p < 0.001). This prognostic effect was consistent in both ARPi and docetaxel subgroups, with no significant interaction between treatment type and Bellmunt score (p-interaction = 0.185). In multivariate analysis, the Bellmunt score remained an independent predictor of OS (HR: 3.13; 95% CI: 1.16-8.43; p = 0.024). The Bellmunt score showed better discriminative ability for OS (C-index: 0.67) than CHAARTED (0.62) and LATITUDE (0.64) criteria. However, the absolute differences in C-index values were modest, and the analysis was restricted to patients with complete data, potentially introducing selection bias.

Conclusion: The Bellmunt risk score appears to offer a practical approach to risk stratification in mCSPC, with promising prognostic value across treatment types. However, its incremental clinical utility over existing criteria is limited, and its role in guiding therapy remains unestablished. These exploratory findings warrant prospective validation.

背景:随着多西他赛和雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPi)加入雄激素剥夺治疗,mCSPC的管理得到了改善。然而,患者的预后仍然不同,这突出了对实用预后模型的需求。基于ECOG状态、血红蛋白和肝转移的bellmont风险评分是针对尿路上皮癌开发的,但其在mCSPC中的作用尚不清楚。方法:本研究回顾性分析了2010年至2024年接受一线多西他赛或ARPi治疗的182例mCSPC患者。根据贝尔蒙特评分将患者分为低危组和高危组。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox模型评估总生存期(OS)。进行亚组分析和相互作用分析,以评估bellmont风险评分在不同治疗方式下的预后价值的一致性。使用一致性指数(C-index)比较bellmont、CHAARTED和LATITUDE标准。结果:低Bellmunt风险评分患者的生存期明显长于高风险患者(中位生存期:44.4 vs 14.1个月);结论:Bellmunt风险评分似乎为mCSPC的风险分层提供了一种实用的方法,在不同的治疗类型中具有良好的预后价值。然而,它在现有标准上的增量临床效用是有限的,其在指导治疗中的作用仍未确定。这些探索性的发现保证了前瞻性的验证。
{"title":"Adapting the Bellmunt Risk Score for Prognostic Stratification in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Satı Coşkun Yazgan, Hatice Bölek, Muharrem Coşkunpınar, Emre Yekedüz, Yüksel Ürün","doi":"10.1002/pros.70062","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of mCSPC has improved with the addition of docetaxel and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) to androgen deprivation therapy. However, patient outcomes remain heterogeneous, highlighting the need for practical prognostic models. The Bellmunt risk score, based on ECOG status, hemoglobin, and liver metastases, was developed for urothelial carcinoma, but its role in mCSPC is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 182 mCSPC patients treated with first-line docetaxel or ARPi from 2010 to 2024. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups by the Bellmunt score. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Subgroup and interaction analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of the Bellmunt risk score's prognostic value across treatment modalities. The Bellmunt, CHAARTED, and LATITUDE criteria were compared using the concordance index (C-index).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a low Bellmunt risk score had significantly longer OS than high-risk patients (median OS: 44.4 vs. 14.1 months; p < 0.001). This prognostic effect was consistent in both ARPi and docetaxel subgroups, with no significant interaction between treatment type and Bellmunt score (p-interaction = 0.185). In multivariate analysis, the Bellmunt score remained an independent predictor of OS (HR: 3.13; 95% CI: 1.16-8.43; p = 0.024). The Bellmunt score showed better discriminative ability for OS (C-index: 0.67) than CHAARTED (0.62) and LATITUDE (0.64) criteria. However, the absolute differences in C-index values were modest, and the analysis was restricted to patients with complete data, potentially introducing selection bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Bellmunt risk score appears to offer a practical approach to risk stratification in mCSPC, with promising prognostic value across treatment types. However, its incremental clinical utility over existing criteria is limited, and its role in guiding therapy remains unestablished. These exploratory findings warrant prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"150-157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetics-Driven, Intensity-Modulated Adaptive Management of Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer. 转移性前列腺癌患者的遗传驱动、强度调节适应性管理。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-05 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70070
Reynier D Rodriguez Rosales, Arjun Venkatesh, Jean-Pierre Kanumuambidi, Yudai Ishiyama, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Hunter Sceats, Thomas D Metzner, Shelby Sparks, Nicole Murray, Mark Bandyk, K C Balaji

Background: Survival differs markedly between men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) confined to lymph nodes (LNM) versus bone (BM). We examined whether site-specific genomic alterations-and their combinations-explain this disparity and could inform intensity-modulated follow-up or therapy.

Methods: Clinical and targeted-sequencing data for 1011 men with mPC in the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics registry were analyzed (LNM-only = 622; BM-only = 389). Genes altered in > 5% of tumors (two-sided p < 0.05) were assessed individually and in every possible multigene cluster for associations with overall survival (OS). Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and the difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST) to pinpoint the first significant curve divergence. Synthetic-lethal (SL) interactions were explored via the SLOAD database.

Results: In total, 18 of 184 profiled genes (9.8%) exceeded the 5% alteration threshold. FOXA1 was enriched in BM, whereas TMPRSS2, ERG, PTEN, ZFHX3, CDK12, and KMT2C were enriched in LNM (p < 0.05). Among 9143 tested gene clusters, 65 were associated with inferior OS; 48 occurred in the LNM subgroup, 17 in the combined cohort, and none in the BM alone. High-risk clusters showed first OS divergence 10-60 months after diagnosis of metastasis. SLOAD identified 615 putative SL pairs involving these genes.

Conclusions: We identified 65 site-specific multigene clusters-chiefly in lymph node-only mPC-that underlie the survival gap between nodal and bone metastases. These signatures suggest a 10-60-month interval that may lend itself for intensity-modulated follow-up. We also discovered hundreds of synthetic-lethal gene-alteration pairs, opening future research opportunities in combinatorial therapeutic targeting.

背景:转移性前列腺癌(mPC)局限于淋巴结(LNM)和骨(BM)患者的生存率明显不同。我们研究了特定位点的基因组改变及其组合是否解释了这种差异,并可以为强度调节的随访或治疗提供信息。方法:对cbiopportal for Cancer Genomics registry中1011例mPC男性患者的临床和靶向测序数据进行分析(lnm = 622; bm = 389)。结果:184个分析基因中有18个(9.8%)超过了5%的改变阈值。FOXA1在BM中富集,而TMPRSS2、ERG、PTEN、ZFHX3、CDK12和KMT2C在LNM中富集(p)。结论:我们鉴定了65个位点特异性多基因簇,主要存在于仅淋巴结的mpc中,这些多基因簇决定了淋巴结和骨转移之间的生存差距。这些特征表明,10-60个月的间隔可能适合进行强度调节的随访。我们还发现了数百个合成致死性基因改变对,为组合治疗靶向开辟了未来的研究机会。
{"title":"Genetics-Driven, Intensity-Modulated Adaptive Management of Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Reynier D Rodriguez Rosales, Arjun Venkatesh, Jean-Pierre Kanumuambidi, Yudai Ishiyama, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Hunter Sceats, Thomas D Metzner, Shelby Sparks, Nicole Murray, Mark Bandyk, K C Balaji","doi":"10.1002/pros.70070","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival differs markedly between men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) confined to lymph nodes (LNM) versus bone (BM). We examined whether site-specific genomic alterations-and their combinations-explain this disparity and could inform intensity-modulated follow-up or therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and targeted-sequencing data for 1011 men with mPC in the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics registry were analyzed (LNM-only = 622; BM-only = 389). Genes altered in > 5% of tumors (two-sided p < 0.05) were assessed individually and in every possible multigene cluster for associations with overall survival (OS). Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and the difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST) to pinpoint the first significant curve divergence. Synthetic-lethal (SL) interactions were explored via the SLOAD database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 of 184 profiled genes (9.8%) exceeded the 5% alteration threshold. FOXA1 was enriched in BM, whereas TMPRSS2, ERG, PTEN, ZFHX3, CDK12, and KMT2C were enriched in LNM (p < 0.05). Among 9143 tested gene clusters, 65 were associated with inferior OS; 48 occurred in the LNM subgroup, 17 in the combined cohort, and none in the BM alone. High-risk clusters showed first OS divergence 10-60 months after diagnosis of metastasis. SLOAD identified 615 putative SL pairs involving these genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified 65 site-specific multigene clusters-chiefly in lymph node-only mPC-that underlie the survival gap between nodal and bone metastases. These signatures suggest a 10-60-month interval that may lend itself for intensity-modulated follow-up. We also discovered hundreds of synthetic-lethal gene-alteration pairs, opening future research opportunities in combinatorial therapeutic targeting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"196-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of Serenoa repens Extract Combined With Alfuzosin Versus Alfuzosin Alone in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Multicenter Randomized Study. Hexanic Serenoa repens提取物联合Alfuzosin与Alfuzosin单独治疗男性因良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状的疗效:一项多中心随机研究
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70071
Giulio Bevilacqua, Dalila Carino, Stefano Salciccia, Alessandro Gentilucci, Flavio Forte, Massimiliano Di Marco, Antonio Pastore, Marco Martini, Stefano Signore, Alessandro Calarco, Martino Recchia, Olivia Voglino, Valenzi Fabio Maria, Pietro Viscuso, Fabrizio Presicce, Ervin Shehu, Marco Frisenda, Alessandro Sciarra

Background: Chronic inflammation is commonly observed in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissue and may contribute to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as well as disease progression. This study evaluated the efficacy of combining a standardized extract of Serenoa repens (Sr) with alfuzosin versus alfuzosin monotherapy in men with LUTS due to BPH.

Methods: In this prospective Phase III, randomized, multicenter, real-world study, 300 treatment-naïve men with moderate-to-severe LUTS (IPSS > 7) and prostate volume > 30 cc were enrolled. Patients received either alfuzosin 10 mg/day or alfuzosin 10 mg plus HESr 320 mg/day for 12 months. Primary endpoints included changes in IPSS and uroflowmetry (Qmax). Secondary endpoints included quality of life (IPSS-Q8), storage symptoms (IPSS-Q2 and Q4), nocturia (IPSS-Q7), erectile function (IIEF-5), and ejaculatory function (MSHQ-Ej). Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-model ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's tests. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro 14 (SAS Institute Inc.). The protocol was approved by our Ethical Committee Lazio Area 1, Protocol 0949/2023, Rif 7385 on December 12, 2023.

Results: Both treatments significantly improved total IPSS over time (p < 0.0001). Across all time points, combination therapy was associated with consistently lower IPSS scores, demonstrating a significant time-by-treatment interaction (p = 0.007). Nocturia improved significantly over time (p < 0.0001); the combination group showed greater benefit from Month 3 onward (p = 0.006), though the main treatment effect was not statistically significant (p = 0.076). Qmax improved in both groups (p < 0.0001), with a significant time-treatment interaction (p = 0.006), but no significant main effect of treatment type (p = 0.113). A mild but significant decline in IIEF-5 was observed in both groups over time. Treatment adherence exceeded 86% in both arms.

Conclusions: The combination of HESr and alfuzosin was significantly more effective than alfuzosin monotherapy in relieving LUTS, with greater benefits from Month 3 onward. Qmax and nocturia also showed greater, although mild, improvements with combination therapy. Sexual function outcomes were comparable between groups. High adherence and real-world applicability support the clinical value of this combination in managing BPH-related LUTS.

背景:慢性炎症常见于良性前列腺增生(BPH)组织,可能导致下尿路症状(LUTS)和疾病进展。本研究评估了标准的白藜芦醇提取物(Sr)与alfuzosin联合治疗前列腺增生引起的LUTS的疗效,以及alfuzosin单药治疗的疗效。方法:在这项前瞻性III期、随机、多中心、真实世界的研究中,纳入了300名treatment-naïve中至重度LUTS (IPSS bbb7)和前列腺体积>30cc的男性。患者接受alfuzosin 10mg /天或alfuzosin 10mg加HESr 320mg /天治疗12个月。主要终点包括IPSS和尿流仪(Qmax)的变化。次要终点包括生活质量(IPSS-Q8)、储存症状(IPSS-Q2和Q4)、夜尿(IPSS-Q7)、勃起功能(IIEF-5)和射精功能(MSHQ-Ej)。结果分析采用混合模型方差分析和事后Tukey检验。使用JMP Pro 14 (SAS Institute Inc.)进行统计分析。该协议于2023年12月12日由拉齐奥伦理委员会1区,协议0949/2023,Rif 7385批准。结果:随着时间的推移,两种治疗均显著改善了总IPSS(两组均有显著改善)。结论:HESr和alfuzosin联合治疗在缓解LUTS方面明显比alfuzosin单药治疗更有效,从第3个月起获益更大。Qmax和夜尿症在联合治疗中也表现出更大的改善,尽管是轻微的。两组之间的性功能结果具有可比性。高依从性和实际适用性支持该组合在治疗bph相关LUTS中的临床价值。
{"title":"Efficacy of Serenoa repens Extract Combined With Alfuzosin Versus Alfuzosin Alone in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Multicenter Randomized Study.","authors":"Giulio Bevilacqua, Dalila Carino, Stefano Salciccia, Alessandro Gentilucci, Flavio Forte, Massimiliano Di Marco, Antonio Pastore, Marco Martini, Stefano Signore, Alessandro Calarco, Martino Recchia, Olivia Voglino, Valenzi Fabio Maria, Pietro Viscuso, Fabrizio Presicce, Ervin Shehu, Marco Frisenda, Alessandro Sciarra","doi":"10.1002/pros.70071","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic inflammation is commonly observed in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissue and may contribute to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as well as disease progression. This study evaluated the efficacy of combining a standardized extract of Serenoa repens (Sr) with alfuzosin versus alfuzosin monotherapy in men with LUTS due to BPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective Phase III, randomized, multicenter, real-world study, 300 treatment-naïve men with moderate-to-severe LUTS (IPSS > 7) and prostate volume > 30 cc were enrolled. Patients received either alfuzosin 10 mg/day or alfuzosin 10 mg plus HESr 320 mg/day for 12 months. Primary endpoints included changes in IPSS and uroflowmetry (Q<sub>max</sub>). Secondary endpoints included quality of life (IPSS-Q8), storage symptoms (IPSS-Q2 and Q4), nocturia (IPSS-Q7), erectile function (IIEF-5), and ejaculatory function (MSHQ-Ej). Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-model ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's tests. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro 14 (SAS Institute Inc.). The protocol was approved by our Ethical Committee Lazio Area 1, Protocol 0949/2023, Rif 7385 on December 12, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatments significantly improved total IPSS over time (p < 0.0001). Across all time points, combination therapy was associated with consistently lower IPSS scores, demonstrating a significant time-by-treatment interaction (p = 0.007). Nocturia improved significantly over time (p < 0.0001); the combination group showed greater benefit from Month 3 onward (p = 0.006), though the main treatment effect was not statistically significant (p = 0.076). Q<sub>max</sub> improved in both groups (p < 0.0001), with a significant time-treatment interaction (p = 0.006), but no significant main effect of treatment type (p = 0.113). A mild but significant decline in IIEF-5 was observed in both groups over time. Treatment adherence exceeded 86% in both arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of HESr and alfuzosin was significantly more effective than alfuzosin monotherapy in relieving LUTS, with greater benefits from Month 3 onward. Q<sub>max</sub> and nocturia also showed greater, although mild, improvements with combination therapy. Sexual function outcomes were comparable between groups. High adherence and real-world applicability support the clinical value of this combination in managing BPH-related LUTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"204-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic Effect of KELIM Score of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Novel Androgen Receptor Inhibitors: Pioneering New Ways. 前列腺特异性抗原KELIM评分对激素敏感前列腺癌患者应用新型雄激素受体抑制剂治疗的预后影响:开拓新途径
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70098
Yusuf Ilhan, Murat Araz, Ali Fuat Gurbuz, Semiha Urvay, Muslih Urun, Berrak Mermit Ercek, Ozden Ozilice, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Canan Yildiz, Hacer Demir, Ismail Beypinar

Background: The prognostic value of the PSA ELIMination rate constant K (PRO-KELIM) score was investigated in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with novel androgen receptor inhibitors.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 160 patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2024 who received enzalutamide or abiraterone during the mCSPC and had at least three PSA measurements within the first 100 days of treatment. The patients were categorized into favorable (PRO-KELIM ≥ 1.0) and unfavorable (PRO-KELIM < 1.0) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression.

Results: Median PFS was significantly higher in the favorable group than in the unfavorable group (not reached vs. 40.0 months, p < 0.001). The estimated 2-year PFS rates in the favorable and unfavorable groups were 78% and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a high PRO-KELIM score (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.35-6.66, p = 0.007) and good initial response to treatment (p = 0.001) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS. The median OS did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.27). PRO-KELIM score was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.76).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the PRO-KELIM score can be a valuable prognostic tool in the mCSPC to assess early treatment response and predict disease progression.

背景:研究了PSA消除率常数K (PRO-KELIM)评分在使用新型雄激素受体抑制剂治疗的转移性去势敏感前列腺癌(mCSPC)患者中的预后价值。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2011年至2024年间诊断为前列腺癌的160例患者,这些患者在mCSPC期间接受了恩杂鲁胺或阿比特龙治疗,并在治疗的前100天内至少进行了3次PSA测量。将患者分为有利组(PRO-KELIM≥1.0)和不利组(PRO-KELIM)。结果:有利组的中位PFS显著高于不利组(未达到vs. 40.0个月)。结论:这些发现表明PRO-KELIM评分可以作为mCSPC评估早期治疗反应和预测疾病进展的有价值的预后工具。
{"title":"Prognostic Effect of KELIM Score of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Novel Androgen Receptor Inhibitors: Pioneering New Ways.","authors":"Yusuf Ilhan, Murat Araz, Ali Fuat Gurbuz, Semiha Urvay, Muslih Urun, Berrak Mermit Ercek, Ozden Ozilice, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Canan Yildiz, Hacer Demir, Ismail Beypinar","doi":"10.1002/pros.70098","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70098","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic value of the PSA ELIMination rate constant K (PRO-KELIM) score was investigated in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with novel androgen receptor inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 160 patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2024 who received enzalutamide or abiraterone during the mCSPC and had at least three PSA measurements within the first 100 days of treatment. The patients were categorized into favorable (PRO-KELIM ≥ 1.0) and unfavorable (PRO-KELIM < 1.0) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median PFS was significantly higher in the favorable group than in the unfavorable group (not reached vs. 40.0 months, p < 0.001). The estimated 2-year PFS rates in the favorable and unfavorable groups were 78% and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a high PRO-KELIM score (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.35-6.66, p = 0.007) and good initial response to treatment (p = 0.001) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS. The median OS did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.27). PRO-KELIM score was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the PRO-KELIM score can be a valuable prognostic tool in the mCSPC to assess early treatment response and predict disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic Value of Micro-Ultrasound in Identifying Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. 微超声对前列腺根治术后局部复发的诊断价值。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-05 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70069
Basil Kaufmann, Manish Choudhary, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Swati Bhardwaj, Adriana Pedraza, Reuben Ben-David, Asher Mandel, Neeraja Tillu, Vinayak G Wagaskar, Mani Menon, Michael A Gorin, Ashutosh K Tewari

Purpose: The limited resolution of standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has made it difficult to perform biopsies of the prostate bed in cases of suspected local recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of using high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) in place of standard TRUS for performing post-prostatectomy biopsies.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pathology reports from January 2013 to October 2024, identifying patients who underwent biopsies of the prostate bed for suspected local recurrence after radical prostate. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for biopsies performed using standard TRUS. A biopsy was deemed diagnostic if it revealed prostate tissue (cancerous or benign) or non-prostatic tissue when a previously suspicious lesion was no longer detectable on subsequent imaging. The ground truth for local recurrence was defined by biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements) accompanied by reproducible findings in the prostate bed on MRI and/or PET.

Results: Of the 24 patients included, 10 (42%) underwent microUS-guided biopsy and 14 (58%) underwent TRUS-guided biopsy. The median PSA levels at biopsy for the microUS and TRUS cohorts were 0.39 ng/mL (range 0.39-6.40) and 0.45 ng/mL (range 0.20-30.82), respectively. The median lesion sizes on MRI were 0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8) for microUS and 2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6) for TRUS. MicroUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 52-100), compared with 43% (95% CI: 18-71) for TRUS. Specificity could not be reliably assessed, as only one recurrence-negative patient was available in the microUS group and none in the TRUS group.

Conclusion: MicroUS-guided transrectal biopsies appear to offer superior diagnostic performance in detecting local recurrences following radical prostatectomy compared to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the performance of microUS-guided biopsies independently of pre-biopsy imaging results.

目的:标准经直肠超声(TRUS)的分辨率有限,使得在根治性前列腺切除术后怀疑局部复发的病例中难以进行前列腺床活检。本研究的目的是对使用高分辨率微超声(microUS)代替标准TRUS进行前列腺切除术后活检的性能进行基准测试。材料与方法:我们回顾性分析2013年1月至2024年10月期间的病理报告,筛选出因前列腺根治性术后疑似局部复发而行前列腺床活检的患者。比较使用标准TRUS进行活检的敏感性和特异性。如果活检显示前列腺组织(癌性或良性)或非前列腺组织,而先前可疑的病变在随后的成像中不再检测到,则认为活检是诊断性的。局部复发的基本事实是通过生化复发(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]在两次连续测量中≥0.2 ng/mL)并伴有MRI和/或PET在前列腺床上的重复性发现来定义的。结果:在纳入的24例患者中,10例(42%)接受了微创引导下的活检,14例(58%)接受了超声引导下的活检。microUS组和TRUS组的活检中位PSA水平分别为0.39 ng/mL(范围0.39-6.40)和0.45 ng/mL(范围0.20-30.82)。MRI中位病灶大小为:microUS为0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8), TRUS为2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6)。MicroUS的敏感性为89% (95% CI: 52-100),而TRUS的敏感性为43% (95% CI: 18-71)。特异性不能可靠地评估,因为在microUS组中只有1例复发阴性患者,而在TRUS组中没有。结论:在根治性前列腺切除术后,与标准的超声引导活检相比,超声引导下的经直肠活检在检测局部复发方面具有更好的诊断效果。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现,并评估独立于活检前成像结果的显微引导活检的性能。
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Micro-Ultrasound in Identifying Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Basil Kaufmann, Manish Choudhary, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Swati Bhardwaj, Adriana Pedraza, Reuben Ben-David, Asher Mandel, Neeraja Tillu, Vinayak G Wagaskar, Mani Menon, Michael A Gorin, Ashutosh K Tewari","doi":"10.1002/pros.70069","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The limited resolution of standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has made it difficult to perform biopsies of the prostate bed in cases of suspected local recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of using high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) in place of standard TRUS for performing post-prostatectomy biopsies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of pathology reports from January 2013 to October 2024, identifying patients who underwent biopsies of the prostate bed for suspected local recurrence after radical prostate. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for biopsies performed using standard TRUS. A biopsy was deemed diagnostic if it revealed prostate tissue (cancerous or benign) or non-prostatic tissue when a previously suspicious lesion was no longer detectable on subsequent imaging. The ground truth for local recurrence was defined by biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements) accompanied by reproducible findings in the prostate bed on MRI and/or PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 24 patients included, 10 (42%) underwent microUS-guided biopsy and 14 (58%) underwent TRUS-guided biopsy. The median PSA levels at biopsy for the microUS and TRUS cohorts were 0.39 ng/mL (range 0.39-6.40) and 0.45 ng/mL (range 0.20-30.82), respectively. The median lesion sizes on MRI were 0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8) for microUS and 2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6) for TRUS. MicroUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 52-100), compared with 43% (95% CI: 18-71) for TRUS. Specificity could not be reliably assessed, as only one recurrence-negative patient was available in the microUS group and none in the TRUS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MicroUS-guided transrectal biopsies appear to offer superior diagnostic performance in detecting local recurrences following radical prostatectomy compared to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the performance of microUS-guided biopsies independently of pre-biopsy imaging results.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12704237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utility of the PROSTest, a Novel Blood-Based Molecular Assay, Versus PSA for Prostate Cancer Stratification and Detection of Disease. 新型血液分子检测方法PROSTest与PSA在前列腺癌分层和疾病检测中的应用
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/pros.70086
Mark Kidd, Grzegorz Rempega, Michal Kepinski, Szymon Slomian, Krystyna Mlynarek, Abdel B Halim

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid organ cancer in men and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. PSA helps identify men at risk but has low specificity and has resulted in unnecessary biopsies. The PROSTest, a novel machine learning-based 27-gene mRNA liquid biopsy assay, was developed to detect PCa. We evaluated its utility as a stratification tool in symptomatic men undergoing biopsy or surgery for PSA > 2 ng/mL.

Methods: Of 123 men assessed, 105 (85%) met eligibility criteria (age > 55 years, PSA > 2 ng/mL, symptomatic) and underwent image-guided biopsy or surgery. Blood samples for PROSTest were collected prebiopsy, and RNA-stabilized samples underwent RNA isolation and cDNA production. PCR results were analyzed using a machine learning algorithm, generating a 0-100 score with a cutoff of 50 for a binary (positive/negative) readout. The performance of PROSTest was against PSA using AUROC and evaluated for Gleason Grade (GG) 1 versus GG2-5 patients.

Results: Median age was 68 years (55-86 years); median PSA was 8.2 ng/mL (IQR: 7.2-92 ng/mL). PCa was diagnosed in 65 men (62%) (27 GG1; 38 GG2-5). PROSTest was positive in 63/65 (97%) of those with PCa and in 2/40 (5%) without PCa. Sensitivity was 97%, specificity 96%. PROSTest outperformed PSA (AUROC: 0.99 vs. 0.61, p < 0.0001). GG2-5 had significantly higher (p < 0.0001) PROSTest scores (92 ± 3).

Conclusions: PROSTest demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to PSA for detecting prostate cancer across all Gleason grades. Additionally, it showed potential for distinguishing GG2-5 from GG1 + BPH, which could help guide clinical decision-making and reduce unnecessary biopsies. By leveraging a machine learning-based approach, PROSTest may offer a more accurate and less invasive diagnostic tool for prostate cancer stratification. However, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and further define its clinical utility.

背景:前列腺癌(PCa)是男性最常见的实体器官癌,也是全球癌症相关死亡的第五大原因。PSA有助于识别有风险的男性,但特异性较低,并导致不必要的活检。PROSTest是一种新型的基于机器学习的27基因mRNA液体活检方法,用于检测PCa。我们评估了它作为一种分层工具在有症状的男性接受活检或手术的PSA bbb20 ng/mL。方法:在123名接受评估的男性中,105名(85%)符合资格标准(年龄bb0 ~ 55岁,PSA bb1 2 ng/mL,有症状),并接受了图像引导的活检或手术。活检前采集血液样本用于PROSTest, RNA稳定的样本进行RNA分离和cDNA制备。PCR结果使用机器学习算法进行分析,生成0-100分,二进制(阳性/阴性)读数的截止值为50。使用AUROC对PROSTest的PSA表现进行评估,并对Gleason分级(GG) 1和GG2-5患者进行评估。结果:中位年龄为68岁(55 ~ 86岁);中位PSA为8.2 ng/mL (IQR: 7.2-92 ng/mL)。确诊前列腺癌65例(62%)(27例GG1; 38例GG2-5)。前列腺癌患者中有63/65(97%),非前列腺癌患者中有2/40(5%)。敏感性为97%,特异性为96%。PROSTest优于PSA (AUROC: 0.99 vs. 0.61, p)结论:与PSA相比,PROSTest在检测所有Gleason分级的前列腺癌方面表现出更高的敏感性和特异性。此外,它还显示了区分GG2-5和GG1 + BPH的潜力,这可以帮助指导临床决策并减少不必要的活检。通过利用基于机器学习的方法,PROSTest可能为前列腺癌分层提供更准确、侵入性更小的诊断工具。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并进一步确定其临床应用。
{"title":"Utility of the PROSTest, a Novel Blood-Based Molecular Assay, Versus PSA for Prostate Cancer Stratification and Detection of Disease.","authors":"Mark Kidd, Grzegorz Rempega, Michal Kepinski, Szymon Slomian, Krystyna Mlynarek, Abdel B Halim","doi":"10.1002/pros.70086","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pros.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid organ cancer in men and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. PSA helps identify men at risk but has low specificity and has resulted in unnecessary biopsies. The PROSTest, a novel machine learning-based 27-gene mRNA liquid biopsy assay, was developed to detect PCa. We evaluated its utility as a stratification tool in symptomatic men undergoing biopsy or surgery for PSA > 2 ng/mL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 123 men assessed, 105 (85%) met eligibility criteria (age > 55 years, PSA > 2 ng/mL, symptomatic) and underwent image-guided biopsy or surgery. Blood samples for PROSTest were collected prebiopsy, and RNA-stabilized samples underwent RNA isolation and cDNA production. PCR results were analyzed using a machine learning algorithm, generating a 0-100 score with a cutoff of 50 for a binary (positive/negative) readout. The performance of PROSTest was against PSA using AUROC and evaluated for Gleason Grade (GG) 1 versus GG2-5 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 68 years (55-86 years); median PSA was 8.2 ng/mL (IQR: 7.2-92 ng/mL). PCa was diagnosed in 65 men (62%) (27 GG1; 38 GG2-5). PROSTest was positive in 63/65 (97%) of those with PCa and in 2/40 (5%) without PCa. Sensitivity was 97%, specificity 96%. PROSTest outperformed PSA (AUROC: 0.99 vs. 0.61, p < 0.0001). GG2-5 had significantly higher (p < 0.0001) PROSTest scores (92 ± 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PROSTest demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to PSA for detecting prostate cancer across all Gleason grades. Additionally, it showed potential for distinguishing GG2-5 from GG1 + BPH, which could help guide clinical decision-making and reduce unnecessary biopsies. By leveraging a machine learning-based approach, PROSTest may offer a more accurate and less invasive diagnostic tool for prostate cancer stratification. However, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and further define its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"307-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Prostate
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1