Multifragmentary and displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are often a challenge for the maxillofacial surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the improved performance in the management of patients with tripod fracture of the orbito-zygomaticomaxillary complex, using two different methods of virtual surgical planning - virtual reduction and mirroring - compared with traditional management. A cohort of 60 patients was selected and divided into three groups, each consisting of 20 individuals. Patients in the first group were managed using the virtual reduction method, those in the second group using the mirroring method, and those in the third group using a traditional surgical approach. Having achieved virtual fracture reduction, a stereolithographic model was printed, on which preplating of the plates was performed. The results showed that virtual reduction was the most accurate in absolute terms, with a mean discrepancy in juxtaposition of the preoperative and postoperative CT images of 0.175 mm (SD ± 0.147), compared with 0.403 (SD ± 0.166) for the mirror method (and traditional method (0.875, SD ± 0.112; p > 0.0001). The average surgical time for virtual reduction (89.5 min) was faster than for mirroring (94.25 min) and for the traditional approach (96.75 min). In conclusion, the use of virtual surgical planning allows greater intraoperative accuracy, reduced surgical time, and reduced postoperative complications compared with traditional surgery. Of the two methods, virtual reduction performed best for the outcomes decribed.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate nasal septum deviation (NSD), nasal bone length (NBL), and the morphology of the middle nasal conchae (MNC) and inferior nasal conchae (INC), as well as their correlations.
Materials and methods: The sample included 56 cone-beam computed tomography scans divided into two groups: a study group (SG; individuals with NF1; n = 28) and a control group (CG; individuals without NF1; n = 28). NSD, NBL, MNC, and INC classifications were assessed. MNC images were classified as normal, bullous, paradoxical, secondary, and accessory. INC images were classified as normal, lamellar, compact, combined, and bullous. Intra- and interobserver reliability were evaluated.
Results: SG had a mean NSD of 11.6° (±4.5°) compared with 9.6° (±3.2°) for the CG, showing moderate deviations with no significant difference between groups. SG had a mean NBL of 22.4 mm (±3.4 mm) compared with 22.1 mm (±3.2 mm) for the CG, with a statistically significant difference. Both groups exhibited normal, bullosa, and accessory MNC classifications. SG INC were normal, lamellar, and combined, whereas CG INC were normal and lamellar. There was a weak correlation between NSD and NBL across groups.
Conclusion: Individuals with NF1 showed longer NBL. The weak correlation between NSD and NBL suggested multifactorial influences on these variations. These findings advance our understanding of craniofacial development in NF1 and highlight the need for further research into nasal cavity involvement in this complex genetic disorder.