Internist最新文献

Telemedicine has the potential to solve many current and especially future challenges in medical care. Using the example of heart failure (HF), the transition of telemedicine from clinical studies to standard care is presented. In patients with chronic HF, randomized controlled trials have shown that telemedicine-based care leads to a reduction in mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Based on these data, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) decided that for the first time a digital method should be introduced into standard care for high-risk patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. In the future, this group of patients will be entitled to telemedical care using active rhythm devices or noninvasive measuring devices. The indications are assessed by the primary treating physician (PBA), who works together with a telemedicine center (TMZ) managed through cardiology that receives daily telemetric data and notifies the PBA of abnormal findings. Alternatively, a cardiologist PBA with an associated TMZ infrastructure can also provide telemedical care. In the future, advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence or mobile communication standard 5G will help to make telemedicine both widely available and usable for alternative sensor technology.

Many cases of Clostridium perfringens sepsis prove to be fatal. We present a case of C. perfringens sepsis with a liver abscess as the focus of infection, which was successfully treated by an interdisciplinary intensive medical care management. The sepsis with this rare pathogen was favored by the presence of a bilioenteric anastomosis and immunosuppressive treatment of a pre-existing Crohn's disease. Antibiotic treatment with clindamycin and penicillin G was initiated and the abscess was drained. Hemodialysis with high cut-off filters was started because of acute kidney failure in the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stage III, hemolysis and rhabdomyolysis. Therapeutic plasma exchange was performed due to sepsis and acute liver failure.

Since the current guidelines were published in 2018, a total of 5 sham-controlled high-quality studies evaluating renal denervation have been conducted and the results were published. These five studies clearly confirmed the efficacy and safety of renal denervation, which correspond to the knowledge of the Clinical Consensus Conference. Thus, an update of the guidelines for the treatment of arterial hypertension regarding the clinical significance of renal denervation is urgently necessary. For this reason, the position paper of the working group of the European Society of Hypertension on the current state of renal denervation was reviewed. An approval of this procedure can soon be expected. In Germany there is a diagnosis-related group (DRG) for the reimbursement of renal denervation, which was suspended due to the erroneous Symplicity 3 study. This DRG should be revived in practice by a structured process of the implementation of renal denervation. It will then be a joint task of treating physicians and specialists in certified centers to identify eligible patients. In the future, antihypertensive treatment will consist of three pillars: lifestyle measures, pharmacotherapy and interventional treatment. These three treatment options should not be regarded as competitive (which is better) but alternative (patient preference) and additive (the aim is blood pressure control). It is the task of the treating physician to provide the patient with the ideal treatment concept. Clearly, renal denervation will not replace antihypertensive pharmacotherapy; however, it can lead to a reduction of the drug burden and increase of patient adherence to medication. It represents an option of modern antihypertensive treatment and will also become increasingly more important in special patient groups.

Background: Management of patients with respiratory disorders, such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), became challenging during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic due to infection prevention measures. To maintain care, a remote monitoring program was initiated, comprising a smartphone app and a Bluetooth spirometry device.

Objective: To assess patient- and physician-related experience with remote monitoring.

Material and methods: Structured questionnaires were developed to rate experiences from the patient or physician perspective on six-level Likert scales. Interactions between patients and physicians via the digital platform and overall utilization was analyzed.

Results: A total of 745 patients with asthma, COPD, post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other respiratory diseases were enrolled from 31 centers in Germany. Mean follow-up was 49.4 ± 12.6 weeks. Each participant submitted on average 289 measurements. Patient-reported experience with the remote monitoring program was positive, with the highest satisfaction reported for "Experience with home measurement" (1.4 ± 0.5; 99% positive), followed by "Communication/interaction" (1.8 ± 0.9; 83% positive) and "Overall satisfaction with program" (1.8 ± 0.8; 87% positive). In all, 70% reported subjective quality of life improvements related to participation in the program. Physician satisfaction with the program was also high with a mean rating of 2.2 ± 1.2.

Discussion: App-based remote monitoring was successfully implemented in routine care during the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic and demonstrated potential for improvements in care. Patient-relevant experience was positive in all dimensions and remote monitoring was well accepted. Physicians who participated in the program also expressed positive experiences, as demonstrated by a high level of interaction with the platform and positive evaluations of effects from the program.