Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie最新文献

Introduction: Although multiple advances have been made in finger defect reconstruction, cross-finger flaps remain an important reconstructive tool. However, data on long-term results are scarce in the literature. This study aimed to assess the clinical and subjective long-term outcomes of patients who underwent cross-finger flap reconstruction for palmar digital and fingertip defects.

Patients and methods: Between January 2003 and July 2022, 35 patients (31 male, 4 female, mean age: 59.0 years±20.1) were screened and included in the study. The data were obtained through a clinical examination, a Quick-DASH score and a self-designed questionnaire. Clinical outcomes were assessed by evaluating the range of motion (ROM) of the reconstructed finger and the donor finger compared with the contralateral uninjured hand. In addition to ROM, a static two-point separation test was performed to assess the sensory function of the reconstructed finger. The follow-up period was between 1 year and 19 years (mean: 12.6 years±6.1).

Results: There was no significant difference in terms of ROM between the reconstructed finger and the donor finger compared with the contralateral uninjured hand. All patients reported normal discrimination between sharp and blunt objects. However, there was a significant difference in two-point discrimination between the reconstructed finger and the healthy contralateral finger (p<0.05). The average Quick-DASH score was 5.1 points. Satisfaction with the functional outcome in terms of mobility and load-bearing capacity of the cross-finger flap averaged 8.1 out of 10 points. Satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructed finger averaged 7.7 out of 10 points. In 4 cases, persistent pain was reported when the reconstructed finger was under stress. No cases of pain at rest were reported.

Conclusion: In the long run, cross-finger flaps are a safe and effective reconstructive procedure for covering defects in palmar injuries of the finger and fingertip amputation. They represent a simple, reliable, long-lasting reconstructive technique. The necessary temporary iatrogenic syndactyly does not lead to long-term limitations in the range of motion.

Autologous postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with favourable long-term clinical outcomes and superior patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with implant-based reconstruction. However, adjuvant radiotherapy has traditionally been considered a relative contraindication to immediate flap-based reconstruction due to its unpredictable effects on the reconstructive outcome. While modern adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been able to significantly reduce acute and chronic radiation-induced complications, plastic surgeons still hesitate to offer immediate autologous reconstruction to patients expected to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy. More recently, evidence has emerged suggesting a paradigm shift in favour of immediate autologous reconstruction despite subsequent radiotherapy. At the 44^th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery (GSRM) in Bern, Switzerland, a workshop discussed the literature on PMRT and autologous breast reconstruction, aiming to establish consensus among the participants. Several areas of agreement were identified, including the goals of postmastectomy reconstruction, specifically the creation of a soft and sensitive breast symmetrical in shape and size to the unaffected breast via the safest procedure possible. The importance of preserving the maximum amount of native breast skin envelope through skin- and nipple-sparing approaches was emphasised. Finally, a consensus was reached that PMRT should no longer be considered a contraindication to immediate autologous breast reconstruction.

The pathogenesis of most cases of carpal tunnel syndrome is not clearly defined. There are some aspects of the disease that suggest a potential effect of genetic predispositions. Mutations (variants) within the genes encoding various subtypes of collagen synthesis, oligomerisation in the endoplasmic reticulum and inactivation of reactive oxygen species may be involved in the development of carpal tunnel syndrome. The objective of this study was to determine the role of DNA alterations within the COL11A, COL1A, COL5A1, COMP and GSTM1 genes in the pathogenesis of carpal tunnel syndrome based on a Polish population.

Study design: In the discovery phase, a total of 96 patients with familial aggregation of CTS were genotyped using a Next Generation Sequencing panel in order to find possible mutations within the studied genes. The potential pathogenicity of the detected variants was investigated using the predictions of several in-silico algorithms and the TaqMan technology. In the association phase of the study, a group of 345 CTS patients and 1035 healthy controls were genotyped.

Results: A total of 35 splice-site or exonic non-synonymous variants were detected by NGS. We did not identify any clearly pathogenic or likely pathogenic alternations. The 30 variants were identified as benign or likely benign. Five missense changes were predicted as VUS and selected for association study. The COL5A1 c.1595 C>T (p.Ala532Val) was detected in one out of 345 cases and three out of 1035 controls (P=1, OR=1); this indicates that the variant is a neutral alteration. Four remaining variants - c.2840 C>A, c.5395 G>A, c.1331 C>G, c.1590 C>A - were present in none out of the 345 CTS patients and none out of 1035 controls.

Conclusion: The main finding of this study was that there was no independent association between the variants of five examined genes and carpal tunnel syndrome. Four uncertain variants were identified that seem to be extremely rare in the Polish population.

Background: Several surgical techniques have been reported for flexor tendon zone 1a-b lacerations without a clear consensus on the gold standard treatment. The purpose of this multicentre study was to measure the outcomes of zone 1a-b flexor tendon injuries treated with a pull-out suture (POS) versus direct suture (DS) technique.

Patients and methods: Fifteen patients were treated with the pull-out technique and 22 patients with a direct suture technique between 2014 and 2020. The controlled active motion (CAM) regimen protocol and a standardised follow-up schedule were used in both groups. Data on the demographics, surgery, and treatment characteristics were collected at baseline as well as at week 6 and 13 post-operatively. The primary outcome measurement was the complication rate. Secondary outcome measurements were reoperation rate, finger range of motion (ROM), strength as well as patient satisfaction.

Results: The patient age ranged from 18 to 75 years in both groups with all patients having a complete FDP lesion after a clean-cut injury. The complication rate was 41% in the POS group and 16% in the DS group. The reoperation rate was 29% in the POS group and 8% in the DS group. Significant between-group differences in favour of the DS group were found in the passive DIP and passive PIP+DIP ROM at week 6 and week 13. Mean hand strength was 28.7 (11.6) kg in the POS group at week 13 and 21.3 (7.9) kg in the DS group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.012) with a medium effect size (r=-0.41). Average patient satisfaction at week 13 was 7.5 (2.2) points in the POS and 7.7 (1.3) points in the DS group. The difference between groups was not significant (p=0.839).

Conclusion: This register-based study demonstrates lower complication and reoperation rates with the direct suture approach compared with a pull-out button technique. Although clinical results were similar between the two surgery techniques at week 13 post-surgery, a direct suture approach should always be attempted whenever possible. If necessary, other local structures should be included to increase suture strength and allow for early active motion rehabilitation regimens.

Background: The duration of the training for hand surgery in Germany was reduced from three to two years in 2020, while other European Countries introduced hand surgery as a separate surgical specialty. Therefore, the structure of hand surgery training in Germany is under intense, ongoing discussion.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the current situation of hand surgery training in Germany.

Material and methods: Two separate online questionnaires were developed for self-assessment of residents and teachers in German hand surgery services. The questionnaire contained 29 questions for residents and 24 questions for teachers. Demographic data, educational tools, surgical training parameters and satisfaction were assessed from May to July 2023. The survey was based on the former training time of three years. The online questionnaire was sent to the members and associate members of the German Society for Hand Surgery via email.

Results: 148 participants answered the questionnaire, including 54 residents and 94 teachers. Overall, more female residents were assessed, whereas the majority of teachers was male. Hand surgery training is mostly conducted in high-level hospitals (tertiary care p=0.012, quaternary care p<0.001). Residents use digital teaching media significantly more often than teachers do (p<0.001). In contrast, teachers use journals (p=0.006) and clinical visits (p=0.024) significantly more often for their training than residents do. Trainers and trainees mostly agreed about time points of surgical milestones during surgical training that should be performed independently. Both trainers and trainees were largely satisfied with the practical and theoretical training in hand surgery.

Conclusions: The importance of digital media in hand surgery training will increase in the near future. Therefore, digital media should be more frequently included in hand surgery training protocols. The study revealed that the majority of residents as well as teachers would appreciate the introduction of an independent hand surgery specialty, which would most likely improve the hand surgery competence in Germany.