Pub Date : 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.032
Alexander Gombert
{"title":"Take a Look in the Crystal Ball: How Atherosclerosis May Help to Predict the Weather.","authors":"Alexander Gombert","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.022
Tara A R van Merrienboer, Karlijn B Rombouts, Natalija Bogunovic, Arnout Mieremet, Jorn P Meekel, Ron Balm, Vivian de Waard, Kak K Yeung
Objective: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a cardiovascular risk factor. Paradoxically, a decreased risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) presence and growth rate is described among patients with T2DM, associated with metformin use. This study aimed to investigate the effect of metformin on AAA patient-derived aortic smooth muscle cell (SMC) function.
Methods: Aortic biopsies were obtained from patients with AAA (n = 21) and controls (n = 17) during surgery. The SMCs of non-pathological aortic controls, non-diabetic patients with AAA, and diabetic patients with AAA were cultured from explants and treated with or without metformin. The SMC contractility was measured upon ionomycin stimulation, as well as metabolic activity, proliferation, and migration. mRNA and protein expression of markers for contraction, metabolic activity, proliferation, and inflammation were measured.
Results: mRNA expression of KLF4 and GYS1, genes involved in metabolic activity, differed between SMCs from non-diabetic and diabetic patients with AAA before metformin stimulation (p < .041). However, the effect of metformin on the various SMC functions was similar between non-diabetic and diabetic patients with AAA. Upon stimulation, metformin increased the contractility of AAA patient SMCs (p = .001). mRNA expression of smoothelin, a marker for the contractile phenotype, increased in SMCs of patients with AAA after treatment with metformin (p = .006). An increase in metabolic activity (p < .001) and a decrease in proliferation (p < .001) and migration were found in the SMCs of controls and patients with AAA with metformin. Increased mRNA expression of PPARγ, a nuclear receptor involved in mitochondrial biogenesis (p < .009), and a decrease in gene expression of Ki-67, a marker for proliferation (p < .005), were observed. Gene expression of inflammation markers MCP-1 and IL-6, and protein expression of NF-κB p65 decreased after treatment with metformin in patients with AAA.
Conclusion: This study found that metformin increases contractility and metabolic activity, and reduces proliferation, migration, and inflammation in aortic SMCs in vitro.
{"title":"Metformin Improves the Function of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patient-Derived Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells.","authors":"Tara A R van Merrienboer, Karlijn B Rombouts, Natalija Bogunovic, Arnout Mieremet, Jorn P Meekel, Ron Balm, Vivian de Waard, Kak K Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a cardiovascular risk factor. Paradoxically, a decreased risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) presence and growth rate is described among patients with T2DM, associated with metformin use. This study aimed to investigate the effect of metformin on AAA patient-derived aortic smooth muscle cell (SMC) function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aortic biopsies were obtained from patients with AAA (n = 21) and controls (n = 17) during surgery. The SMCs of non-pathological aortic controls, non-diabetic patients with AAA, and diabetic patients with AAA were cultured from explants and treated with or without metformin. The SMC contractility was measured upon ionomycin stimulation, as well as metabolic activity, proliferation, and migration. mRNA and protein expression of markers for contraction, metabolic activity, proliferation, and inflammation were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>mRNA expression of KLF4 and GYS1, genes involved in metabolic activity, differed between SMCs from non-diabetic and diabetic patients with AAA before metformin stimulation (p < .041). However, the effect of metformin on the various SMC functions was similar between non-diabetic and diabetic patients with AAA. Upon stimulation, metformin increased the contractility of AAA patient SMCs (p = .001). mRNA expression of smoothelin, a marker for the contractile phenotype, increased in SMCs of patients with AAA after treatment with metformin (p = .006). An increase in metabolic activity (p < .001) and a decrease in proliferation (p < .001) and migration were found in the SMCs of controls and patients with AAA with metformin. Increased mRNA expression of PPARγ, a nuclear receptor involved in mitochondrial biogenesis (p < .009), and a decrease in gene expression of Ki-67, a marker for proliferation (p < .005), were observed. Gene expression of inflammation markers MCP-1 and IL-6, and protein expression of NF-κB p65 decreased after treatment with metformin in patients with AAA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that metformin increases contractility and metabolic activity, and reduces proliferation, migration, and inflammation in aortic SMCs in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.030
Petroula Nana, Konstantinos Spanos, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Stéphan Haulon, Jonathan Sobocinski, Enrico Gallitto, Nuno Dias, Wolf Eilenberg, Anders Wanhainen, Kevin Mani, Dittmar Böckler, Luca Bertoglio, Carla van Rijswijk, Bijan Modarai, Arne Seternes, Florian K Enzmann, Athanasios Giannoukas, Mauro Gargiulo, Tilo Kölbel
Objective: Despite the increasing number of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR) procedures, evidence on post-operative antiplatelet therapy is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the role of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after f/bEVAR on 30 day and follow up outcomes.
Methods: A multicentre retrospective analysis was conducted, including f/bEVAR patients managed from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. Comparative outcomes were assessed according to post-operative antiplatelet therapy. The cohort was divided into the SAPT group (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] or clopidogrel) and DAPT group (ASA and clopidogrel). The duration of SAPT or DAPT was one to six months. Primary outcomes were 30 day death, and cardiovascular ischaemic and major haemorrhagic events. Secondary outcomes were survival and target vessel (TV) patency during follow up.
Results: A total of 1 430 patients were included: 955 under SAPT and 475 under DAPT. The 30 day mortality was similar (SAPT 2.1% vs. DAPT 1.5%; p = .42). Cardiovascular ischaemic events were lower in the DAPT group (SAPT 11.9% vs. DAPT 8.2%; p = .040), with DAPT being an independent protector for acute mesenteric (p = .009) and lower limb ischaemia (p = .020). No difference was found in 30 day major haemorrhagic events (SAPT 7.5% vs. DAPT 6.3%; p = .40). The mean follow up was 21.8 ± 2.9 months. Cox regression showed no cofounders on survival, with similar rates between groups (log rank p = .71). DAPT patients presented higher TV patency (SAPT 93.4%, standard error [SE] 0.7% vs. DAPT 96.6%, SE 0.7%; log rank p = .007) at thirty six months. Cox regression revealed bEVAR as a predictor of worse TV patency (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.36 - 3.03; p < .001). DAPT was related to higher patency within bEVAR patients (SAPT 87.2%, SE 2.1% vs. DAPT 94.9%, SE 1.9%; p < .001).
Conclusions: DAPT after f/bEVAR was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular ischaemic events and higher TV patency, especially in bEVAR cases. No difference in major haemorrhagic events was observed at 30 days.
目的:尽管带瓣/带支主动脉瓣修复术(f/bEVAR)的数量不断增加,但缺乏术后抗血小板治疗的证据。本研究旨在探讨单抗血小板疗法(SAPT)与双抗血小板疗法(DAPT)在 f/bEVAR 术后 30 天和随访结果中的作用:进行了一项多中心回顾性分析,包括2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受治疗的f/bEVAR患者。比较结果根据术后抗血小板治疗进行评估。队列分为 SAPT 组(乙酰水杨酸 [ASA] 或氯吡格雷)和 DAPT 组(ASA 和氯吡格雷)。SAPT 或 DAPT 的持续时间为一至六个月。主要结果为30天死亡、心血管缺血性和大出血事件。次要结果是随访期间的存活率和靶血管(TV)通畅率:共纳入 1 430 名患者:结果:共纳入了 1 430 名患者:955 名接受 SAPT 治疗,475 名接受 DAPT 治疗。30天死亡率相似(SAPT为2.1%,DAPT为1.5%;P = .42)。DAPT组的心血管缺血事件较少(SAPT 11.9% vs. DAPT 8.2%; p = .040),DAPT对急性肠系膜缺血(p = .009)和下肢缺血(p = .020)具有独立的保护作用。在 30 天的大出血事件中没有发现差异(SAPT 7.5% 对 DAPT 6.3%;p = .40)。平均随访时间为 21.8±2.9 个月。Cox 回归结果显示,各组之间的生存率相似(对数秩 p = .71),没有共同因素。DAPT患者在36个月时的TV通畅率更高(SAPT 93.4%, 标准误差 [SE] 0.7% vs. DAPT 96.6%, 标准误差 0.7%; log rank p = .007)。Cox 回归显示,bEVAR 是预测电视通畅率降低的一个因素(危险比 2.03,95% 置信区间 1.36 - 3.03;p < .001)。DAPT与bEVAR患者较高的通畅率有关(SAPT 87.2%, SE 2.1% vs. DAPT 94.9%, SE 1.9%; p < .001):F/BEVAR术后DAPT与较低的心血管缺血性事件风险和较高的TV通畅率相关,尤其是在BEVAR病例中。30天后观察到的大出血事件没有差异。
{"title":"Role of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Managed for Complex Aortic Aneurysms using Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Repair.","authors":"Petroula Nana, Konstantinos Spanos, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Stéphan Haulon, Jonathan Sobocinski, Enrico Gallitto, Nuno Dias, Wolf Eilenberg, Anders Wanhainen, Kevin Mani, Dittmar Böckler, Luca Bertoglio, Carla van Rijswijk, Bijan Modarai, Arne Seternes, Florian K Enzmann, Athanasios Giannoukas, Mauro Gargiulo, Tilo Kölbel","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the increasing number of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR) procedures, evidence on post-operative antiplatelet therapy is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the role of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after f/bEVAR on 30 day and follow up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre retrospective analysis was conducted, including f/bEVAR patients managed from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. Comparative outcomes were assessed according to post-operative antiplatelet therapy. The cohort was divided into the SAPT group (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] or clopidogrel) and DAPT group (ASA and clopidogrel). The duration of SAPT or DAPT was one to six months. Primary outcomes were 30 day death, and cardiovascular ischaemic and major haemorrhagic events. Secondary outcomes were survival and target vessel (TV) patency during follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1 430 patients were included: 955 under SAPT and 475 under DAPT. The 30 day mortality was similar (SAPT 2.1% vs. DAPT 1.5%; p = .42). Cardiovascular ischaemic events were lower in the DAPT group (SAPT 11.9% vs. DAPT 8.2%; p = .040), with DAPT being an independent protector for acute mesenteric (p = .009) and lower limb ischaemia (p = .020). No difference was found in 30 day major haemorrhagic events (SAPT 7.5% vs. DAPT 6.3%; p = .40). The mean follow up was 21.8 ± 2.9 months. Cox regression showed no cofounders on survival, with similar rates between groups (log rank p = .71). DAPT patients presented higher TV patency (SAPT 93.4%, standard error [SE] 0.7% vs. DAPT 96.6%, SE 0.7%; log rank p = .007) at thirty six months. Cox regression revealed bEVAR as a predictor of worse TV patency (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.36 - 3.03; p < .001). DAPT was related to higher patency within bEVAR patients (SAPT 87.2%, SE 2.1% vs. DAPT 94.9%, SE 1.9%; p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DAPT after f/bEVAR was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular ischaemic events and higher TV patency, especially in bEVAR cases. No difference in major haemorrhagic events was observed at 30 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-21DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.029
Nikolaos Konstantinou, Tomasz Jakimowicz, Stephan Haulon, Maximilian Pichlmaier, Said Abisi, Luis Mendes Pedro, Adib Khanafer, Nikolaos Tsilimparis
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes after endovascular aortic arch repair in patients with a mechanical aortic valve where the valve needs to be crossed.
Methods: An international, multicentre, retrospective observational study was undertaken including all consecutive patients who underwent endovascular arch repair with mechanical aortic valve crossing.
Results: From March 2020 to August 2023, 12 patients were included in the study (median age 55 years, interquartile range 45, 67 years; 58% male). Five patients (42%) had a genetically confirmed connective tissue disorder (CTD) and three more had a high clinical suspicion of CTD. Most patients had a bileaflet valve (11/12; 92%) and one patient had a monoleaflet one. All patients had previously undergone surgical ascending aortic repair. Technical success was 100% with successful completion of the procedure with no valve damage. Two deaths (17%) were observed in the first 30 days post-operatively with no signs of valve malfunction: one patient died of major stroke due to excessive wire and sheath manipulation in the arch; and another due to cardiac arrest of unknown cause, with no valve damage being detected in the autopsy. No intra-operative technical difficulties regarding valve cannulation were observed. During a median follow up of eight months, one patient died fifteen months after the procedure owing to non-aortic related causes, and four endoleaks were present on the latest computed tomography angiography, none type I or III.
Conclusion: Endovascular aortic arch repair in a selected group of patients with a mechanical aortic valve, treated in experienced high volume aortic centres, seems technically feasible and reasonably safe. These preliminary results underline the complexity of the procedure and should be validated by larger cohort studies. With careful patient selection and adequate physician experience, the presence of a mechanical aortic valve could potentially no longer pose a major contraindication to endovascular arch repair in the future.
{"title":"Outcomes after Endovascular Arch Repair in Patients with a Mechanical Aortic Valve: Results from a Multicentre Study.","authors":"Nikolaos Konstantinou, Tomasz Jakimowicz, Stephan Haulon, Maximilian Pichlmaier, Said Abisi, Luis Mendes Pedro, Adib Khanafer, Nikolaos Tsilimparis","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes after endovascular aortic arch repair in patients with a mechanical aortic valve where the valve needs to be crossed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international, multicentre, retrospective observational study was undertaken including all consecutive patients who underwent endovascular arch repair with mechanical aortic valve crossing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 2020 to August 2023, 12 patients were included in the study (median age 55 years, interquartile range 45, 67 years; 58% male). Five patients (42%) had a genetically confirmed connective tissue disorder (CTD) and three more had a high clinical suspicion of CTD. Most patients had a bileaflet valve (11/12; 92%) and one patient had a monoleaflet one. All patients had previously undergone surgical ascending aortic repair. Technical success was 100% with successful completion of the procedure with no valve damage. Two deaths (17%) were observed in the first 30 days post-operatively with no signs of valve malfunction: one patient died of major stroke due to excessive wire and sheath manipulation in the arch; and another due to cardiac arrest of unknown cause, with no valve damage being detected in the autopsy. No intra-operative technical difficulties regarding valve cannulation were observed. During a median follow up of eight months, one patient died fifteen months after the procedure owing to non-aortic related causes, and four endoleaks were present on the latest computed tomography angiography, none type I or III.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular aortic arch repair in a selected group of patients with a mechanical aortic valve, treated in experienced high volume aortic centres, seems technically feasible and reasonably safe. These preliminary results underline the complexity of the procedure and should be validated by larger cohort studies. With careful patient selection and adequate physician experience, the presence of a mechanical aortic valve could potentially no longer pose a major contraindication to endovascular arch repair in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.024
Mingwei Wu, Luxia Ren, Haibo Wang, Jiang Xiong
Objective: This study aimed to identify the iliac artery characteristics of East Asian patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to evaluate anatomical suitability rates with current iliac branch devices (IBDs).
Methods: This was a single centre, retrospective, cross sectional study. Patients diagnosed with AAA between 2008 and 2023 were enrolled. The morphological parameters of the iliac arteries were measured, and their eligibility for four IBDs (Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD) was evaluated according to the manufacturer's latest instructions for use (IFU).
Results: Among 1 144 AAAs observed in the study, 45.5% (n = 521) presented with concurrent common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA). In total, 304 patients (26.6%) and 371 iliac arteries necessitated internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction. The anatomical suitability rates for the Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD were 18.9%, 21.8%, 11.9%, and 22.6%, respectively. The E-Liac IBD exhibited a significantly lower anatomical suitability rate compared with the other three devices (p < .001). The primary IBD exclusion criteria were: a common iliac artery (CIA) length of < 50 mm for Cook ZBIS (n = 211, 56.9%); an IIA diameter of < 6.5 mm or > 13.5 mm for Gore IBE (n = 177, 47.7%); and a CIA bifurcation diameter of < 18 mm both for E-Liac IBD and G-Iliac IBD (n = 244, 65.8%). A total of 198 patients (53.4%) failed to meet the anatomical criteria for any device, while 112 (30.2%) qualified for just one device, 26 (7.0%) for two devices, 25 (6.7%) for three devices, and 10 (2.7%) for all four devices.
Conclusion: A significant proportion of East Asian patients with AAA present with concurrent CIAA, necessitating substantial IIA reconstruction. IBD techniques show low anatomical suitability rates among the East Asian population, with 53.4% of patients failing to meet anatomical criteria for any IBD based on the manufacturer's IFU.
{"title":"Anatomical Suitability of Iliac Branch Devices for East Asian Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.","authors":"Mingwei Wu, Luxia Ren, Haibo Wang, Jiang Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify the iliac artery characteristics of East Asian patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to evaluate anatomical suitability rates with current iliac branch devices (IBDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single centre, retrospective, cross sectional study. Patients diagnosed with AAA between 2008 and 2023 were enrolled. The morphological parameters of the iliac arteries were measured, and their eligibility for four IBDs (Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD) was evaluated according to the manufacturer's latest instructions for use (IFU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1 144 AAAs observed in the study, 45.5% (n = 521) presented with concurrent common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA). In total, 304 patients (26.6%) and 371 iliac arteries necessitated internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction. The anatomical suitability rates for the Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD were 18.9%, 21.8%, 11.9%, and 22.6%, respectively. The E-Liac IBD exhibited a significantly lower anatomical suitability rate compared with the other three devices (p < .001). The primary IBD exclusion criteria were: a common iliac artery (CIA) length of < 50 mm for Cook ZBIS (n = 211, 56.9%); an IIA diameter of < 6.5 mm or > 13.5 mm for Gore IBE (n = 177, 47.7%); and a CIA bifurcation diameter of < 18 mm both for E-Liac IBD and G-Iliac IBD (n = 244, 65.8%). A total of 198 patients (53.4%) failed to meet the anatomical criteria for any device, while 112 (30.2%) qualified for just one device, 26 (7.0%) for two devices, 25 (6.7%) for three devices, and 10 (2.7%) for all four devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of East Asian patients with AAA present with concurrent CIAA, necessitating substantial IIA reconstruction. IBD techniques show low anatomical suitability rates among the East Asian population, with 53.4% of patients failing to meet anatomical criteria for any IBD based on the manufacturer's IFU.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.028
Joakim Nordanstig, Willemien van de Water, Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya
{"title":"Intervention for Intermittent Claudication: Primum Non Nocere.","authors":"Joakim Nordanstig, Willemien van de Water, Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Open Survey on Barriers to International Research in Vascular Surgery and Potential Role of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.","authors":"Fabien Lareyre, Matthias Trenner, Juliette Raffort, Robert J Hinchliffe, Athanasios Saratzis","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.023
Lorenz Meuli, Christoph Kuemmerli
{"title":"Are You in the State of Mind for Multistate Models?","authors":"Lorenz Meuli, Christoph Kuemmerli","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.025
Joakim Nordanstig, Karin Ludwigs, Vishal Amlani
{"title":"Conservative Therapy for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: What we See Might Depend Mainly on What we are Looking For.","authors":"Joakim Nordanstig, Karin Ludwigs, Vishal Amlani","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}