European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery最新文献

Objective: Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is suboptimal due to limited compliance and relatively large variability in measurement methods of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac size after treatment. Measuring volume offers a more sensitive early indicator of aneurysm sac growth or regression and stability, but is more time consuming and thus less practical than measuring maximum diameter. This study evaluated the accuracy and consistency of the artificial intelligence (AI) driven software PRAEVAorta 2 and compared it with an established semi-automated segmentation method.

Methods: Post-EVAR aneurysm sac volumes measured by AI were compared with a semi-automated segmentation method (3mensio software) in patients with an infrarenal AAA, focusing on absolute aneurysm volume and volume evolution over time. The clinical impact of both methods was evaluated by categorising patients as showing either AAA sac regression, stabilisation, or growth comparing the 30 day and one year post-EVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. Inter- and intra-method agreement were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's κ statistic.

Results: Forty nine patients (98 CTA images) were analysed, after excluding 15 patients due to segmentation errors by AI owing to low quality CT scans. Aneurysm sac volume measurements showed excellent correlation (ICC = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 - 0.99) with good to excellent correlation for volume evolution over time (ICC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.91). Categorisation of AAA sac evolution showed fair correlation (Cohen's κ = 0.33), with 12 discrepancies (24%) between methods. The intra-method agreement for the AI software demonstrated perfect consistency (bias = -0.01 cc), indicating that it is more reliable compared with the semi-automated method.

Conclusion: Despite some differences in AAA sac volume measurements, the highly consistent AI driven software accurately measured AAA sac volume evolution. AAA sac evolution classification appears to be more reliable than existing methods and may therefore improve risk stratification post-EVAR, and could facilitate AI driven personalised surveillance programmes. While high quality CTA images are crucial, considering radiation exposure is important, validating the software with non-contrast CT scans might reduce the radiation burden.

Objective: Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA) pose a clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the 30 day mortality and morbidity rates for open aneurysm repair (OAR) and fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR), and the effect of hospital volume in patients with asymptomatic cAAA in Switzerland.

Methods: Retrospective, cohort study using data from Switzerland's national registry for vascular surgery, Swissvasc, including patients treated from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2022. All patients with asymptomatic, true, non-infected cAAA were identified. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality and morbidity rates reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Outcomes were compared between OAR and F/B-EVAR after propensity score weighting.

Results: Of the 461 patients identified, 333 underwent OAR and 128 underwent F/B-EVAR for cAAA. At 30 days, the overall mortality rate was 3.3% after OAR and 3.1% after F/B-EVAR (p = .76). Propensity score weighted analysis indicated similar morbidity rates for both approaches: F/B-EVAR (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45 - 1.05, p = .055); intestinal ischaemia (1.8% after OAR, 3.1% after F/B-EVAR, p = .47) and renal failure requiring dialysis (1.5% after OAR, 5.5% after F/B-EVAR, p = .024) were associated with highest morbidity and mortality rates. Treatment specific complications with high morbidity were abdominal compartment syndrome and lower limb compartment syndrome following F/B-EVAR. Overall treatment volume was low for most of the hospitals treating cAAA in Switzerland; outliers with increased mortality rates were identified among low volume hospitals.

Conclusion: Comparable 30 day mortality and morbidity rates were found between OAR and F/B-EVAR for cAAA in Switzerland; lack of centralisation was also highlighted. Organ specific complications driving death were renal failure, intestinal ischaemia, and limb ischaemia, specifically after F/B-EVAR. Treatment in specialised high volume centres, alongside efforts to reduce peri-procedural kidney injury and mesenteric ischaemia, offers potential to lower morbidity and mortality rates in elective cAAA treatment.

Objective: Manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (EJVES) often contain shortcomings in baseline scientific principles and incorrectly applied methodology. Consequently, the editorial team is forced to offer post hoc repair in an attempt to support the authors to improve their manuscripts. This repair could theoretically have been prevented by providing more clear definitions and reporting standards to serve researchers when planning studies and eventually writing their manuscripts. Therefore, the general principles for EJVES publication standards are summarised here.

Methods: These publication standards did not follow a systematic approach but reflect the common opinion of the current Senior and Section Editors team. This team decided to only include recommendations regarding the most common pathologies in vascular surgery in this first edition of publication standards, namely carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), and chronic venous disease. In future editions, the plan is to expand the areas of research.

Results: Presented are (1) a common set of minimum but required publication standards applicable to every report, e.g., patient characteristics, study design, treatment environment, selection criteria, core outcomes of interventions such as 30 day death and morbidity, and measures for completeness of data including outcome information, and (2) a common set of minimum publication standards for four vascular areas.

Conclusion: The editors of the EJVES propose universally accepted definitions and publication standards for carotid artery disease, AAA, PAOD, and chronic venous disease. This will enable the development of a convincing body of evidence to aid future clinical practice guidelines and drive clinical practice in the right direction. These first ever publication and reporting standards for EJVES aim to improve future research published in the journal.

Objective: Patients with polyvascular disease are considered high risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This retrospective study used the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database to quantify the effect of polyvascular disease on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods: The VQI database was queried from 2012 - 2022 for elective EVAR. Patients were identified as having peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, or cerebrovascular disease, and then stratified based on the number of arterial beds involved (one to three). Primary outcomes were peri-operative death and MACE. Multivariable analysis was performed to find associations between comorbidities and primary outcomes.

Results: Of the 21 160 patients with arterial disease included in the study, 83.7% were male and the mean age was 73.73 ± 8.57 years. After stratification, 16 892 patients had atherosclerosis in one arterial bed, 3 869 in two arterial beds, and 399 in three arterial beds. Pre-operatively, patients with atherosclerosis in three arterial beds were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, and renal failure (all p < .001). Post-operatively, patients with disease in three arterial beds were more likely to experience a post-operative complication (11.5% vs. 8.3% vs. 5.4%; p < .001), including MACE (4.3% vs. 2.5% vs. 1.3%; p < .001) and death (2.8% vs. 1.1% vs. 0.5%; p < .001). On multivariable analysis, polyvascular disease was associated with MACE (odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.29 - 1.84; p < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimates showed statistically significant differences in survival at approximately the three year follow up (p < .001).

Conclusion: In this review of patients undergoing elective EVAR, patients with polyvascular disease experienced worse peri-operative outcomes, including death and MACE, the latter of which was confirmed on multivariable analysis. These patients should be considered high risk and managed accordingly.