Pub Date : 2026-03-03DOI: 10.1177/07067437261426621
Rahina Abubacker, Pradeep Yuvaraj, Aravind Kumar Rajasekaran, Aravinda Hanumanthapura Ramalingaiah, Binukumar Bhaskarpillai, Michael Berk, Lakshmi N Yatham, Muralidharan Kesavan
BackgroundEmerging evidence suggests overlap in brain areas implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and vestibular activity in the brainstem, potentially underlying the postural instability observed in BD-I. Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP), a validated tool that quantifies the functional contributions of somatosensory, visual, and vestibular inputs, as well as the central mechanisms responsible for integrating these inputs, was employed to examine the sensory processing and postural control in BD-I.Aims and ObjectivesTo investigate the integrity of dynamic postural control and the contributions of somatosensory, visual, and vestibular sensory systems to postural stability in individuals with BD-I in remissionMethodThirty participants aged 18-50 years with BD-I in remission (ICD-11; female = 12), not on known vestibular suppressants, and 30 matched controls (female = 13) underwent CDP, which included the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), adaptation test, Motor Control Test (MCT), fall risk test, and Optokinetic test (OKN). The differences between the groups were assessed using an independent samples t-test.ResultsBD-I participants showed significantly poorer scores on SOT, fall risk test, and OKN test (all p < 0.005). We did not find significant differences in the adaptation test and MCT.Discussion and ConclusionsBD-I subjects exhibited greater postural alterations compared to healthy controls, indicating impaired sensory integration, especially when visual input was altered. Fall risk and OKN tests suggest central deficits in processing vestibular and proprioceptive input. These findings support postural control assessment as a potential biomarker for BD-I, though medication effects remain an important consideration.
{"title":"Dynamic Postural Control in Remitted Bipolar I Disorder: A Computerized Dynamic Posturography Study: Contrôle postural dynamique chez les personnes atteintes d'un trouble bipolaire de type I en rémission : Étude de posturographie dynamique informatisée.","authors":"Rahina Abubacker, Pradeep Yuvaraj, Aravind Kumar Rajasekaran, Aravinda Hanumanthapura Ramalingaiah, Binukumar Bhaskarpillai, Michael Berk, Lakshmi N Yatham, Muralidharan Kesavan","doi":"10.1177/07067437261426621","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437261426621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEmerging evidence suggests overlap in brain areas implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and vestibular activity in the brainstem, potentially underlying the postural instability observed in BD-I. Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP), a validated tool that quantifies the functional contributions of somatosensory, visual, and vestibular inputs, as well as the central mechanisms responsible for integrating these inputs, was employed to examine the sensory processing and postural control in BD-I.Aims and ObjectivesTo investigate the integrity of dynamic postural control and the contributions of somatosensory, visual, and vestibular sensory systems to postural stability in individuals with BD-I in remissionMethodThirty participants aged 18-50 years with BD-I in remission (ICD-11; female = 12), not on known vestibular suppressants, and 30 matched controls (female = 13) underwent CDP, which included the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), adaptation test, Motor Control Test (MCT), fall risk test, and Optokinetic test (OKN). The differences between the groups were assessed using an independent samples <i>t</i>-test.ResultsBD-I participants showed significantly poorer scores on SOT, fall risk test, and OKN test (all <i>p</i> < 0.005). We did not find significant differences in the adaptation test and MCT.Discussion and ConclusionsBD-I subjects exhibited greater postural alterations compared to healthy controls, indicating impaired sensory integration, especially when visual input was altered. Fall risk and OKN tests suggest central deficits in processing vestibular and proprioceptive input. These findings support postural control assessment as a potential biomarker for BD-I, though medication effects remain an important consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437261426621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147345624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-03DOI: 10.1177/07067437261425086
Naomi White, Stéphane Potvin, André Do, Emmanuel Stip
Background: Subjective cognitive complaints, or neurocognitive insight, reflect to patients' awareness of cognitive functioning. In schizophrenia, these complaints show inconsistent links with objective cognition, psychiatric symptoms, and illness insight. The Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS), a validated self-report tool developed in Canada and used internationally, enables a homogeneous synthesis. Objective: This meta-analysis examined whether subjective complaints measured with the SSTICS are associated with objective cognition, psychiatric symptoms, and illness insight, and reviewed its factorial structure. Method: We conducted a meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified studies using the SSTICS in psychiatric populations. Eligible studies compared patients to healthy controls and/or examined correlations with cognition, symptoms, or illness insight or conducted factor analyses of the SSTICS domains. Results: Twenty-five studies (N = 3,205) met criteria. Schizophrenia patients reported more cognitive complaints than controls (d = 0.746). No significant correlation emerged with global objective cognition (r = 0.105). Complaints were unrelated to positive, negative, or general symptoms but showed a moderate association with depressive symptoms (r = 0.300) and a small one with illness insight (r = 0.155). Factor analyses consistently identified 3 domains: memory, attention, and daily living. Conclusions: SSTICS-based complaints are substantial in schizophrenia but largely dissociated from objective cognition, reflecting impaired neurocognitive insight. Instead, they are more strongly linked to depressive symptoms, suggesting complaints reflect emotional distress rather than actual deficits. Findings support refining SSTICS subscales and extending investigations to other psychiatric populations.
{"title":"Cognitive Complaints in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS): Les plaintes cognitives dans la schizophrénie : Une méta-analyse des études utilisant la <i>Subjective Scale To Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia</i> (SSTICS).","authors":"Naomi White, Stéphane Potvin, André Do, Emmanuel Stip","doi":"10.1177/07067437261425086","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437261425086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Subjective cognitive complaints, or neurocognitive insight, reflect to patients' awareness of cognitive functioning. In schizophrenia, these complaints show inconsistent links with objective cognition, psychiatric symptoms, and illness insight. The Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS), a validated self-report tool developed in Canada and used internationally, enables a homogeneous synthesis. <b>Objective:</b> This meta-analysis examined whether subjective complaints measured with the SSTICS are associated with objective cognition, psychiatric symptoms, and illness insight, and reviewed its factorial structure. <b>Method:</b> We conducted a meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified studies using the SSTICS in psychiatric populations. Eligible studies compared patients to healthy controls and/or examined correlations with cognition, symptoms, or illness insight or conducted factor analyses of the SSTICS domains. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-five studies (<i>N</i> = 3,205) met criteria. Schizophrenia patients reported more cognitive complaints than controls (<i>d</i> = 0.746). No significant correlation emerged with global objective cognition (<i>r</i> = 0.105). Complaints were unrelated to positive, negative, or general symptoms but showed a moderate association with depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> = 0.300) and a small one with illness insight (<i>r</i> = 0.155). Factor analyses consistently identified 3 domains: memory, attention, and daily living. <b>Conclusions:</b> SSTICS-based complaints are substantial in schizophrenia but largely dissociated from objective cognition, reflecting impaired neurocognitive insight. Instead, they are more strongly linked to depressive symptoms, suggesting complaints reflect emotional distress rather than actual deficits. Findings support refining SSTICS subscales and extending investigations to other psychiatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437261425086"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956623/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147345670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-03DOI: 10.1177/07067437261425026
Félix Diotte, Christine Genest, Hugo Thomas, Tania Lecomte
BackgroundIndividuals with psychotic disorders face an elevated risk of suicide, yet current assessment tools often lack adaptations for this population's unique clinical realities. No standardized guidelines exist specifically for assessing suicide risk in psychosis, contributing to variability in clinical practice.MethodsA two-round Delphi survey was conducted with 42 professionals specializing in suicide prevention or psychotic disorders. Participants rated the relevance of 100 items related to suicide risk assessment and potential systemic facilitators. The top 35 items from the first round were retained for further prioritization in the second round. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze consensus levels.ResultsOnly eight out of 29 systemic factors received strong support, mostly related to the availability of practical tools and structural supports. Of the 71 risk assessment items, 35 surpassed the 4.25/5 relevance threshold. Highest consensus was found for items related to suicidal ideation and planning, such as intent, method, and access to means. Protective factors were also endorsed, while psychological/internal states (e.g., burdensomeness) were rated less relevant.DiscussionFindings underscore clinicians' emphasis on immediate risk and practical tools over abstract internal states. Results advocate for developing standardized, population-specific assessment protocols that balance risk and protective factors in individuals with a psychotic disorder.
{"title":"Toward a Standardized Suicide Risk Assessment in Psychotic Disorders: A Delphi Study With Mental Health Experts: Vers une évaluation standardisée du risque de suicide chez les personnes atteintes de troubles psychotiques : étude Delphi auprès d'experts en santé mentale.","authors":"Félix Diotte, Christine Genest, Hugo Thomas, Tania Lecomte","doi":"10.1177/07067437261425026","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437261425026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIndividuals with psychotic disorders face an elevated risk of suicide, yet current assessment tools often lack adaptations for this population's unique clinical realities. No standardized guidelines exist specifically for assessing suicide risk in psychosis, contributing to variability in clinical practice.MethodsA two-round Delphi survey was conducted with 42 professionals specializing in suicide prevention or psychotic disorders. Participants rated the relevance of 100 items related to suicide risk assessment and potential systemic facilitators. The top 35 items from the first round were retained for further prioritization in the second round. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze consensus levels.ResultsOnly eight out of 29 systemic factors received strong support, mostly related to the availability of practical tools and structural supports. Of the 71 risk assessment items, 35 surpassed the 4.25/5 relevance threshold. Highest consensus was found for items related to suicidal ideation and planning, such as intent, method, and access to means. Protective factors were also endorsed, while psychological/internal states (e.g., burdensomeness) were rated less relevant.DiscussionFindings underscore clinicians' emphasis on immediate risk and practical tools over abstract internal states. Results advocate for developing standardized, population-specific assessment protocols that balance risk and protective factors in individuals with a psychotic disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437261425026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956615/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147345658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-04DOI: 10.1177/07067437241291774
Joseph Sadek, Carla Garcia, Nishardi Waidyaratne-Wijeratne, Khalid Bazaid, Alberto Choy, Kathryn C Fung, Rajat Jayas, Sreelatha Varapravan, Michael Sb Mak, Thomas Raedler, Hillary Bohler, Nina Kuzenko, Catherine Hickey, Harry Karlinsky, Marianne Côté-Olijnyk, Michael Harrington, Debra Hamer
{"title":"Psychiatric Training During Clerkship: Specific Recommendations for Reform-Part 1, Teaching and Learning.","authors":"Joseph Sadek, Carla Garcia, Nishardi Waidyaratne-Wijeratne, Khalid Bazaid, Alberto Choy, Kathryn C Fung, Rajat Jayas, Sreelatha Varapravan, Michael Sb Mak, Thomas Raedler, Hillary Bohler, Nina Kuzenko, Catherine Hickey, Harry Karlinsky, Marianne Côté-Olijnyk, Michael Harrington, Debra Hamer","doi":"10.1177/07067437241291774","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437241291774","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"234-252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411472/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1177/07067437251387565
Rafal M Skiba, Abhijit M Chinchani, Mahesh Menon, Martin Lepage, Katie M Lavigne, Ashok Malla, Ridha Joober, Joel O Goldberg, R Walter Heinrichs, David J Castle, Amy Burns, Michael W Best, Susan L Rossell, Sebastian Walther, Todd S Woodward
ObjectiveCognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Our previous study on a first-episode psychosis cohort showed that symptoms related to impoverished/disorganized communication and motor impoverishment predicted verbal and working memory scores, respectively. This study aimed to explore those predictors in people across the range of illness chronicity.MethodsWe employed iterative Constrained Principal Component Analysis (iCPCA) to investigate the relationship between 15 cognitive measures from the MATRICS battery, including processing speed, attention, working, verbal and nonverbal memory, reasoning, and problem-solving, and 27 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) items in 198 outpatients from two sites in Australia and one in Canada. The iCPCA method was used to determine symptoms that reliably predict specific combinations of cognitive measures while controlling Type I errors.ResultsWe found that a verbal memory and learning component was predicted by the PANSS item Lack of Spontaneity and Flow of Conversation, and a visual attention/working memory component was linked to the PANSS item Motor Retardation.ConclusionsThese accord with our previous findings in an early psychosis sample, that is, negative symptoms of diminished expression are key predictors of cognitive abilities in schizophrenia. Namely, communication and motor impoverishments predicted lower scores on tests of verbal memory, learning, visual attention, and working memory. These findings may inform personalized treatment approaches targeting cognitive deficits and negative symptoms in schizophrenia.
目的认知障碍是精神分裂症谱系障碍的核心特征。我们之前对首发精神病队列的研究表明,沟通障碍和运动障碍相关的症状分别预测了言语和工作记忆得分。这项研究旨在探索这些预测因素在人们的疾病慢性范围。方法采用迭代约束主成分分析(iCPCA)对来自澳大利亚和加拿大两个地区的198例门诊患者的处理速度、注意力、工作、言语和非言语记忆、推理和问题解决等15项认知测量指标与PANSS量表(Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, PANSS) 27项指标之间的关系进行研究。iCPCA方法用于确定在控制I型错误的同时可靠地预测特定认知措施组合的症状。结果言语记忆和学习部分与PANSS项目“会话缺乏自发性和流畅性”相关,视觉注意/工作记忆部分与PANSS项目“运动发育迟缓”相关。结论这与我们之前在早期精神病样本中的发现一致,即表达减少的阴性症状是精神分裂症认知能力的关键预测因素。也就是说,在言语记忆、学习、视觉注意力和工作记忆的测试中,沟通和运动贫乏预示着较低的分数。这些发现可能为针对精神分裂症认知缺陷和阴性症状的个性化治疗方法提供信息。
{"title":"A multisite study of the overlap between symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia: Une étude multicentrique sur le chevauchement entre les symptômes et les troubles cognitifs chez les personnes atteintes de schizophrénie.","authors":"Rafal M Skiba, Abhijit M Chinchani, Mahesh Menon, Martin Lepage, Katie M Lavigne, Ashok Malla, Ridha Joober, Joel O Goldberg, R Walter Heinrichs, David J Castle, Amy Burns, Michael W Best, Susan L Rossell, Sebastian Walther, Todd S Woodward","doi":"10.1177/07067437251387565","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437251387565","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Our previous study on a first-episode psychosis cohort showed that symptoms related to impoverished/disorganized communication and motor impoverishment predicted verbal and working memory scores, respectively. This study aimed to explore those predictors in people across the range of illness chronicity.MethodsWe employed iterative Constrained Principal Component Analysis (iCPCA) to investigate the relationship between 15 cognitive measures from the MATRICS battery, including processing speed, attention, working, verbal and nonverbal memory, reasoning, and problem-solving, and 27 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) items in 198 outpatients from two sites in Australia and one in Canada. The iCPCA method was used to determine symptoms that reliably predict specific combinations of cognitive measures while controlling Type I errors.ResultsWe found that a verbal memory and learning component was predicted by the PANSS item <i>Lack of Spontaneity and Flow of Conversation</i>, and a visual attention/working memory component was linked to the PANSS item <i>Motor Retardation</i>.ConclusionsThese accord with our previous findings in an early psychosis sample, that is, negative symptoms of diminished expression are key predictors of cognitive abilities in schizophrenia. Namely, communication and motor impoverishments predicted lower scores on tests of verbal memory, learning, visual attention, and working memory. These findings may inform personalized treatment approaches targeting cognitive deficits and negative symptoms in schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"199-209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12546101/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145350047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1177/07067437251408174
Jitender Sareen, Corinne Isaak, Essence Perera, David A Ross, Vincent Agyapong, Adekunle Garba Ahmed, Karin J Neufeld, Gustavo Turecki, John Haggarty, Jessika Roy-Desruisseaux, Sarah Noble, Lakshmi N Yatham, Patricia Hall, Simon Hatcher, Valerie Taylor, Pierre Gagnon, Zainab Samaan, Francois Lesperance, Benoit Mulsant
BackgroundIn 2023/2024, there were 15 psychiatrists/100,000 Canadians with inequitable distribution across Canada and unprecedented demand for mental health and addiction services. Psychiatry human resource planning in Canada has not occurred for more than a decade. The objectives of this study were to understand the current state and future directions related to Psychiatry Human Resources in the Canadian mental health care system.MethodsUsing Delphi methods, we surveyed the 17 chairs of the academic departments of psychiatry in Canada and held focus groups. The Royal College and subspecialty programs were also engaged. Themes were extracted, summarized and refined. The refined themes were distributed via an online survey to all 17 chairs for final review and input, ensuring alignment and consensus across institutions.ResultsCommon themes focused on: the role of psychiatrists working in teams to provide care for complex mental disorders and addictions; need for innovative models of care including use of physician extenders, technology to reach the larger population of patients with mild to moderate disorders, working closely with primary care in collaborative care models. Due to the large proportion of Canadian psychiatrists being 35 years or more in practice (26%) and close to retirement, the chairs supported the need to expand the number of residency positions for psychiatry and continue strong recruitment efforts for international medical graduates. Although the majority of chairs supported shortening the general psychiatry residency program from 5 to 4 years, the Association of Chairs of Psychiatry of Canada (ACPC) could not reach a consensus on this issue. Pan-Canadian licensing for psychiatrists should be considered due to inequitable distribution of psychiatrists in Canada and advances in virtual care post-COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionsThis study will contribute to the dialogue on psychiatry human resources planning in Canada.
{"title":"Canadian Psychiatry Human Resource Planning: Delphi-Method Study of Academic Chairs of Psychiatry of Canada: Planification des ressources humaines en psychiatrie au Canada : étude menée à l'aide des méthodes Delphi auprès des chefs de département de psychiatrie au Canada.","authors":"Jitender Sareen, Corinne Isaak, Essence Perera, David A Ross, Vincent Agyapong, Adekunle Garba Ahmed, Karin J Neufeld, Gustavo Turecki, John Haggarty, Jessika Roy-Desruisseaux, Sarah Noble, Lakshmi N Yatham, Patricia Hall, Simon Hatcher, Valerie Taylor, Pierre Gagnon, Zainab Samaan, Francois Lesperance, Benoit Mulsant","doi":"10.1177/07067437251408174","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437251408174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn 2023/2024, there were 15 psychiatrists/100,000 Canadians with inequitable distribution across Canada and unprecedented demand for mental health and addiction services. Psychiatry human resource planning in Canada has not occurred for more than a decade. The objectives of this study were to understand the current state and future directions related to Psychiatry Human Resources in the Canadian mental health care system.MethodsUsing Delphi methods, we surveyed the 17 chairs of the academic departments of psychiatry in Canada and held focus groups. The Royal College and subspecialty programs were also engaged. Themes were extracted, summarized and refined. The refined themes were distributed via an online survey to all 17 chairs for final review and input, ensuring alignment and consensus across institutions.ResultsCommon themes focused on: the role of psychiatrists working in teams to provide care for complex mental disorders and addictions; need for innovative models of care including use of physician extenders, technology to reach the larger population of patients with mild to moderate disorders, working closely with primary care in collaborative care models. Due to the large proportion of Canadian psychiatrists being 35 years or more in practice (26%) and close to retirement, the chairs supported the need to expand the number of residency positions for psychiatry and continue strong recruitment efforts for international medical graduates. Although the majority of chairs supported shortening the general psychiatry residency program from 5 to 4 years, the Association of Chairs of Psychiatry of Canada (ACPC) could not reach a consensus on this issue. Pan-Canadian licensing for psychiatrists should be considered due to inequitable distribution of psychiatrists in Canada and advances in virtual care post-COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionsThis study will contribute to the dialogue on psychiatry human resources planning in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"174-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811089/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1177/07067437251396765
David E Freedman, Anthony Feinstein
{"title":"Depression in Multiple Sclerosis: A Clinical Primer for Psychiatrists.","authors":"David E Freedman, Anthony Feinstein","doi":"10.1177/07067437251396765","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437251396765","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"231-233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12626846/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145551863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-25DOI: 10.1177/07067437251398100
Tanisse Epp, Kim Hellemans, Kim Corace, Gord Garner, Benoit-Antoine Bacon
{"title":"Lived Experience and the Need for Co-Leadership in Mental and Substance Use Health Care.","authors":"Tanisse Epp, Kim Hellemans, Kim Corace, Gord Garner, Benoit-Antoine Bacon","doi":"10.1177/07067437251398100","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437251398100","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"169-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12646944/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1177/07067437251408168
Madison MacKinnon, Alene Toulany, Claire de Oliveira, Tea Rosic, Paul Kurdyak
ObjectiveThe current supply and distribution of child psychiatrists in Ontario is not well understood, making it difficult to effectively plan mental healthcare services for children and adolescents. Therefore, we developed a data-driven definition of psychiatrists who focus on treating child and adolescents, and described their demographic characteristics, geographic distribution, and practice patterns across Ontario in 2023.MethodA cross-sectional study was employed using administrative data from ICES. All practicing Ontario-based psychiatrists, defined as those submitting at least one billing claim to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan were included. Psychiatrists from the years 2013-2023 were included to create the definition of child-focused psychiatrists. Child-focused psychiatrists were defined as those with ≥50% or more of their patients ≤18 years of age. Then, this definition was applied to psychiatrists in 2023 to compare and descriptively summarize data (e.g., age, sex, rurality of practice location, and practice patterns) between child- and adult-focused psychiatrists.ResultsIn 2023, there was a total of 259 child-focused psychiatrists and 2,099 adult-focused psychiatrists in Ontario. Child-focused psychiatrists were younger (mean age ± SD: 55.8 ± 9.3 vs. 60.1 ± 11.5, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (59.1% vs. 46.2%, p < 0.001), and less likely to work in rural regions than adult-focused psychiatrists. Both, on average, saw a similar number of patients overall (276.7 ± 265.9 vs. 329.3 ± 403.1, p = 0.115), but child-focused psychiatrists saw patients less frequently than adult-focused psychiatrists (3.0 ± 1.8 vs 6.5 ± 9.1, p<0.001). Child-focused psychiatrists were less likely to have small patient panels as well (p < 0.001).ConclusionsChild-focused psychiatrists represent a small proportion of the psychiatric workforce in Ontario, with particularly limited availability in rural regions. Compared to adult-focused psychiatrists, they are less likely to maintain smaller practices and they see their patients less frequently.
{"title":"Defining, Locating, and Characterizing Psychiatrists who Primarily Treat Children and Adolescents and their Practices in Ontario: A Cross-Sectional Study: Définir, localiser et caractériser les psychiatres qui traitent principalement les enfants et les adolescents et leurs pratiques en Ontario : étude transversale.","authors":"Madison MacKinnon, Alene Toulany, Claire de Oliveira, Tea Rosic, Paul Kurdyak","doi":"10.1177/07067437251408168","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437251408168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe current supply and distribution of child psychiatrists in Ontario is not well understood, making it difficult to effectively plan mental healthcare services for children and adolescents. Therefore, we developed a data-driven definition of psychiatrists who focus on treating child and adolescents, and described their demographic characteristics, geographic distribution, and practice patterns across Ontario in 2023.MethodA cross-sectional study was employed using administrative data from ICES. All practicing Ontario-based psychiatrists, defined as those submitting at least one billing claim to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan were included. Psychiatrists from the years 2013-2023 were included to create the definition of child-focused psychiatrists. Child-focused psychiatrists were defined as those with ≥50% or more of their patients ≤18 years of age. Then, this definition was applied to psychiatrists in 2023 to compare and descriptively summarize data (e.g., age, sex, rurality of practice location, and practice patterns) between child- and adult-focused psychiatrists.ResultsIn 2023, there was a total of 259 child-focused psychiatrists and 2,099 adult-focused psychiatrists in Ontario. Child-focused psychiatrists were younger (mean age ± SD: 55.8 ± 9.3 vs. 60.1 ± 11.5, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (59.1% vs. 46.2%, p < 0.001), and less likely to work in rural regions than adult-focused psychiatrists. Both, on average, saw a similar number of patients overall (276.7 ± 265.9 vs. 329.3 ± 403.1, p = 0.115), but child-focused psychiatrists saw patients less frequently than adult-focused psychiatrists (3.0 ± 1.8 vs 6.5 ± 9.1, p<0.001). Child-focused psychiatrists were less likely to have small patient panels as well (p < 0.001).ConclusionsChild-focused psychiatrists represent a small proportion of the psychiatric workforce in Ontario, with particularly limited availability in rural regions. Compared to adult-focused psychiatrists, they are less likely to maintain smaller practices and they see their patients less frequently.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"219-230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12747871/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145859360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1177/07067437251408172
Laura Frankow, Chad A Bousman, Nickie Mathew, Reza Rafizadeh
BackgroundGuidelines for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) advocate for a trial of clozapine monotherapy before the consideration of antipsychotic augmentation. Commonly cited justifications for augmentation include inadequate response to clozapine monotherapy and the potential to lower the necessary clozapine dose or serum concentration, thereby reducing dose-dependent adverse effects. Nonetheless, the degree to which these outcomes are realized in routine clinical practice, particularly among individuals with concurrent disorders, remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the extent to which clozapine monotherapy is utilized before the initiation of antipsychotic augmentation strategies, and to assess the effects of antipsychotic augmentation on clozapine serum concentrations and the incidence of related adverse effects.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and drug monitoring data from 80 adults with TRS and substance use disorder (SUD) comorbidity at a provincial inpatient centre for concurrent disorders. Antipsychotic augmentation was quantified using Defined Daily Dose (DDD). Generalized and linear mixed models compared the impact of monotherapy vs. augmentation on clozapine serum levels and adverse effects, adjusting for covariates.ResultsMost patients receiving antipsychotic augmentation (78%) did not have an adequate trial of clozapine monotherapy. Analysis revealed that clozapine with antipsychotic augmentation was modestly and negatively associated (B = -0.039; 95% CI = -0.078 - -0.001) with clozapine serum concentrations, particularly at higher DDD (≥2). Clozapine with antipsychotic augmentation was not associated with reduced incidence of dose-dependent adverse events (tachycardia, constipation, or overall anticholinergic medication use).ConclusionFindings from this study indicate that commonly cited rationales for combining clozapine with antipsychotic augmentation - namely, enhancing tolerability through clozapine dose reduction or mitigating inadequate response to monotherapy - are not consistently supported by real-world outcomes. These results underscore the necessity for clinical guidelines to incorporate context-sensitive recommendations that address the complexities inherent in managing individuals with TRS and comorbid SUDs, while integrating real-world considerations and the perspectives of those with lived experience.
背景:治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的指南提倡在考虑抗精神病药物增强治疗之前先进行氯氮平单药治疗的试验。常用的理由包括对氯氮平单药治疗反应不足,以及降低必要的氯氮平剂量或血清浓度的潜力,从而减少剂量依赖性不良反应。然而,这些结果在常规临床实践中的实现程度,特别是在患有并发疾病的个体中,仍然不确定。本研究旨在探讨在开始抗精神病增强策略之前氯氮平单药治疗的使用程度,并评估抗精神病增强对氯氮平血清浓度和相关不良反应发生率的影响。方法回顾性分析某省级住院中心80例TRS合并物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的临床和药物监测数据。使用限定日剂量(DDD)对抗精神病药物增强进行量化。广义和线性混合模型比较了单药治疗与强化治疗对氯氮平血清水平和不良反应的影响,调整了协变量。结果大多数接受抗精神病药物增强治疗的患者(78%)没有进行充分的氯氮平单药治疗试验。分析显示氯氮平与抗精神病药增强作用与氯氮平血清浓度呈中度负相关(B = -0.039; 95% CI = -0.078 - -0.001),特别是在较高DDD(≥2)时。氯氮平加抗精神病药物与剂量依赖性不良事件(心动过速、便秘或整体抗胆碱能药物使用)发生率降低无关。结论:本研究的结果表明,氯氮平与抗精神病药物联合使用的常见理由——即通过减少氯氮平剂量来增强耐受性或减轻单药治疗的不良反应——并没有得到现实世界结果的一致支持。这些结果强调了临床指南纳入情境敏感建议的必要性,以解决管理TRS和合并症sud患者固有的复杂性,同时整合现实世界的考虑因素和有生活经验的人的观点。
{"title":"Clozapine Therapy With or Without Antipsychotic Augmentation: A Retrospective Evaluation of Prescribing Practices in a Canadian Provincial Residential Treatment Centre for Concurrent Disorders: Traitement par la clozapine avec ou sans intensification à l'aide d'antipsychotiques : évaluation rétrospective des pratiques de prescription dans un centre de traitement résidentiel provincial canadien pour les troubles concomitants.","authors":"Laura Frankow, Chad A Bousman, Nickie Mathew, Reza Rafizadeh","doi":"10.1177/07067437251408172","DOIUrl":"10.1177/07067437251408172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGuidelines for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) advocate for a trial of clozapine monotherapy before the consideration of antipsychotic augmentation. Commonly cited justifications for augmentation include inadequate response to clozapine monotherapy and the potential to lower the necessary clozapine dose or serum concentration, thereby reducing dose-dependent adverse effects. Nonetheless, the degree to which these outcomes are realized in routine clinical practice, particularly among individuals with concurrent disorders, remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the extent to which clozapine monotherapy is utilized before the initiation of antipsychotic augmentation strategies, and to assess the effects of antipsychotic augmentation on clozapine serum concentrations and the incidence of related adverse effects.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and drug monitoring data from 80 adults with TRS and substance use disorder (SUD) comorbidity at a provincial inpatient centre for concurrent disorders. Antipsychotic augmentation was quantified using Defined Daily Dose (DDD). Generalized and linear mixed models compared the impact of monotherapy vs. augmentation on clozapine serum levels and adverse effects, adjusting for covariates.ResultsMost patients receiving antipsychotic augmentation (78%) did not have an adequate trial of clozapine monotherapy. Analysis revealed that clozapine with antipsychotic augmentation was modestly and negatively associated (B = -0.039; 95% CI = -0.078 - -0.001) with clozapine serum concentrations, particularly at higher DDD (≥2). Clozapine with antipsychotic augmentation was not associated with reduced incidence of dose-dependent adverse events (tachycardia, constipation, or overall anticholinergic medication use).ConclusionFindings from this study indicate that commonly cited rationales for combining clozapine with antipsychotic augmentation - namely, enhancing tolerability through clozapine dose reduction or mitigating inadequate response to monotherapy - are not consistently supported by real-world outcomes. These results underscore the necessity for clinical guidelines to incorporate context-sensitive recommendations that address the complexities inherent in managing individuals with TRS and comorbid SUDs, while integrating real-world considerations and the perspectives of those with lived experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"210-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}