Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology最新文献

Objective: To determine the current status of core and advanced adult gastroenterology training in Canada.

Methods: A survey consisting of 20 questions pertaining to core and advanced endoscopy training was circulated to 14 accredited adult gastroenterology residency program directors. For continuous variables, median and range were analyzed; for categorical variables, percentage and associated 95% CIs were analyzed.

Results: All 14 programs responded to the survey. The median number of core trainees was six (range four to 16). The median (range) procedural volumes for gastroscopy, colonoscopy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and sigmoidoscopy, respectively, were 400 (150 to 1000), 325 (200 to 1500), 15 (zero to 250) and 60 (25 to 300). Eleven of 13 (84.6%) programs used endoscopy simulators in their curriculum. Eight of 14 programs (57%) provided a structured advanced endoscopy training fellowship. The majority (88%) offered training of combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography. The median number of positions offered yearly for advanced endoscopy fellowship was one (range one to three). The median (range) procedural volumes for ERCP, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic mucosal resection, respectively, were 325 (200 to 750), 250 (80 to 400) and 20 (10 to 63). None of the current programs offered training in endoscopic submucosal dissection or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Conclusion: Most accredited adult Canadian gastroenterology programs met the minimal procedural requirements recommended by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology during core training. However, a more heterogeneous experience has been observed for advanced training. Additional studies would be required to validate and standardize evaluation tools used during gastroenterology curricula.

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder of the small intestine that occurs in genetically predisposed individuals. Animal studies have suggested that the hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathway is involved in gut inflammation, injury and repair.

Objective: To examine the expression of components of the Hh signalling pathway in CD.

Methods: Children undergoing gastroscopy investigation for CD at Monash University (Victoria, Australia), and other children undergoing gastroscopy in whom small bowel pathology was not expected (ie, controls), were included in the present study. One histopathologist, who was blinded to the biopsy data, analyzed the biopsies and a diagnosis of CD was made according to standard Marsh criteria. From these samples, RNA was extracted and complementary DNA was synthesized using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The levels of Hh ligand Sonic hh, Indian hh, protein patched homologue 1 (PTCH 1) and bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) messenger RNA were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Relative expression quantification was performed using the ΔΔCt method.

Results: Duodenal biopsies were collected from 37 children. There were 20 CD specimens and 17 normal controls. The relative expression of Sonic hh from CD patients was 58% lower than that of the controls; similarly, Indian hh expression was decreased in children with CD by 44%. Compared with controls, the expression of Hh receptor PTCH 1 decreased by 71% and the expression of the Hh target gene BMP4 by 42%.

Conclusions: The expression of the Hh signalling pathway genes was consistently downregulated in untreated CD children. These results suggest that the Hh signalling pathway plays a role in the mucosal lesions encountered in CD.

Objective: Patient experiences with endoscopy visits within a large central Canadian health region were evaluated to determine the relationship between the visit experience and the patients' willingness to return for future endoscopy, and to identify the factors associated with patients' willingness to return.

Methods: A self-report survey was distributed to 1200 consecutive individuals undergoing an upper and⁄or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy at any one of the six hospital-based endoscopy facilities in the region. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between the patients' overall rating of the visits and willingness to return for repeat procedures under similar medical circumstances. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with willingness to return for repeat endoscopy and overall satisfaction (rating) of the visit.

Results: A total of 529 (44%) individuals returned the questionnaire, with 45% rating the visit as excellent and 56% indicating they were extremely likely to return for repeat endoscopy. There was a low moderate correlation between overall rating of the visit and patients' willingness to return for repeat endoscopy (r=0.30). The factors independently associated with patient willingness to return for repeat endoscopy included perceived technical skills of the endoscopists (OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.3 to 5.5]), absence of pain during the procedure (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.3 to 3.6]) and history of previous endoscopy (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.4 to 4.1]). In contrast, the independent factors associated with the overall rating of the visit included information provided pre- and postprocedure, wait time before and on the day of the visit, and the physical environment.

Conclusions: To facilitate patient return for needed endoscopy, it is important to assess patients' willingness to return because positive behavioural intent is not simply a function of satisfaction with the visit.

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 is a food- and waterborne pathogen that causes significant morbidity and mortality in both developing and industrialized nations. The present review focuses on the history, epidemiology and evolution of the pathogen; provides a mechanistic overview of major virulence factors (including Shiga toxins, locus of enterocyte effacement pathogenicity island and pO157 plasmid); discusses host immune responses to infection; considers available animal models; and provides an overview of current and potential future management considerations.

Background: Single-operator cholangioscopy enables direct diagnostic visualization and therapeutic intervention in the biliary tree. There is increasing evidence of its clinical utility in the assessment of biliary strictures and treatment of difficult stones.

Objective: To describe the first reported Canadian experience with managing biliary disease using single-operator cholangioscopy.

Methods: The present study was a retrospective analysis of data collected from all sequential patients undergoing single-operator cholangioscopy for assessment of biliary strictures and treatment of biliary stones. The main outcome measures were the ability to make an overall diagnosis of stricture (based on visual appearances and tissue histology), and to fragment and extract biliary stones.

Results: Thirty patients (17 women), mean age 66 years (range 41 to 89 years) underwent single-operator cholangioscopy. In biliary strictures (20 patients), overall accuracy for visual and tissue diagnosis was 84% and 81%, respectively. Successful electrohydraulic lithotripsy with stone clearance was achieved in 90% of the 10 patients who failed previous conventional therapy. The mean (± SD) procedure time was 61±21 min (range 20 min to 119 min). One patient developed mild postendoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy pancreatitis.

Conclusion: The results of this experience reaffirms the clinical utility and safety of single-operator cholangioscopy for the management of biliary pathology. Further improvements can be achieved with increasing operator experience and refinements in optical technology.

Background: Current quality improvement tools for endoscopy services, such as the Global Rating Scale (GRS), emphasize the need for patient-centred care. However, there are no studies that have investigated patient expectations and/or perceptions of quality indicators in endoscopy services.

Objectives: To identify quality indicators for colonoscopy services from the patient perspective; to rate indicators of importance; to determine factors that influence indicator ratings; and to compare the identified indicators with those of the GRS.

Methods: A two-phase mixed methods study was undertaken in Montreal (Quebec), Calgary (Alberta) and Hamilton (Ontario) among patients ≥18 years of age who spoke and read English or French. In phase 1, focus group participants identified quality indicators that were then used to construct a survey questionnaire. In phase 2, survey questionnaires, which were completed immediately after colonoscopy, prompted respondents to rate the 20 focus group-derived indicators according to their level of importance (low, medium, high) and to list up to nine additional items. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced focus group-derived indicator ratings. Patient-identified indicators were compared with those used in the GRS to identify novel indicators.

Results: Three quality indicator themes were identified by 66 participants in 12 focus groups: communication, comfort and service environment. Of the 828 surveys distributed, 402 (48.6%) were returned and 65% of focus group-derived indicators were rated highly important by at least 55% of survey respondents. Indicator ratings differed according to age, sex, site and perceived colorectal cancer risk. Of the 29 patient-identified indicators, 17 (58.6%) were novel.

Conclusions: Patients identified 17 novel quality indicators, suggesting that patients and health professionals differ in their perspectives with respect to quality in colonoscopy services.

Background: Previously published studies have suggested that patients with resected colon cancer have an increased risk for early metachronous colon cancer. Current screening guidelines recommend intense surveillance by colonoscopy for the initial five years after the initial colon cancer has been resected. Information regarding endoscopically removed malignant polyps is limited.

Methods: In the present study, 25 consecutive patients (14 male, 11 female) with malignant pedunculated colon polyps treated with snare cautery polypectomy were followed for more than one decade up to 20 years. Five patients required an additional resection to ensure that removal of the original cancer was complete. Annual colonoscopies were planned for five years. If an adenoma was detected in the fifth year, colonoscopy was performed annually until no adenomas were detected. Otherwise, colonoscopy was planned every three years after five years.

Results: In the present study, there was no mortality from colon cancer and no patient developed either recurrent colon cancer or an early metachronous colon cancer during the initial five-year period of surveillance. Two patients (one male, one female) ultimately developed late cecal cancers almost one decade after the original colon cancers were resected. One had an early stage cancer that was resected, while the other had an infiltrating mucinous carcinoma complicating a small tubulovillous adenoma with extension to a single lymph node. After surgical removal and adjuvant chemotherapy, no further neoplastic disease has been detected.

Conclusions: Overall, patients with malignant pedunculated polyps do extremely well if appropriately managed at the time of the initial polypectomy. Short-term outcomes after removal of a malignant polyp(s) appear to be similar to those with a nonmalignant polyp. However, late metachronous colon cancer may still occur. Long-term follow-up should be considered in each patient, assuming reasonable life expectancy, because risk of additional adenomas and metachronous colon cancer persists even after the initial five years of currently recommended surveillance. Patients with resected malignant polyps may represent a special patient subgroup that requires surveillance for more extended periods than current guidelines have recommended.