Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes最新文献

Purpose: Evaluate global interest in middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization, for subdural hematoma, by analyzing search behavior and academic output using Google Trends and PubMed data.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis conducted using Google Trends data from January 2004 to March 2025 and PubMed publication records from 1965 to 2025. The Google dataset included normalized monthly search volume indices (SVI: 0-100), geographic distribution, and related queries. Academic interest was assessed by annual publication counts. Statistical methods included Mann-Kendall trend tests, Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root tests, Portmanteau white noise tests, and Spearman correlations to evaluate significance and associations. Forecasts were generated using polynomial regression models.

Results: Search interest remained negligible from 2004 to 2011, increasing modestly through 2019 before accelerating significantly. PubMed publications followed a similar pattern, with sharp growth beginning in 2015. Both datasets exhibited significant upward trends (Mann-Kendall: Tau = 0.80 for PubMed; 0.75 for Google, P < .000001). Trends were confirmed as deterministic (ADF P < .001) and non-random (Portmanteau P < .001). A strong correlation was observed between academic and public interest (Spearman r = .86, R² = .74, P < .001). Polynomial forecasting (R² = .93) projects continued publication growth, estimating 267 ± 24 publications by 2027. Search interest is expected to stabilize at high levels (SVI 70-90).

Conclusion: Interest in MMA embolization is rapidly accelerating across both public and academic domains. These trends suggest a paradigm shift that may soon influence treatment guidelines, care delivery models, and the global adoption of this technique.

Background: Physicians in Canada are disproportionately concentrated in urban centers, with rural regions facing significant gaps in specialist care. The geo-spatial characteristics of Interventional Radiology (IR) in Canada have not been systematically studied. This study examines the distribution of Canadian Association of Interventional Radiology (CAIR) members and the sociodemographic characteristics of the populations they serve.

Methods: A list of active members of the Canadian Association of IR (CAIR) was obtained in May 2025. Data from the Canadian Census was used to gather census division (CD)-level information on population size and demographics including data on ethnicity, income, education, employment, and income. CDs were grouped and compared between those with access to IR care and those without, compared between top and bottom quartiles for each population characteristic, and mapped.

Results: Of 293 CDs in Canada, only 48 (19.6%) had at least one CAIR IR, leaving 31.6% of the national population without local access. CAIR IRs were strongly clustered in high-population CDs, with Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal alone accounting for 56.5% of IRs. CDs with CAIR IRs had significantly higher mean populations (527 322 vs 47 675; P < .001), median incomes ($82 760 vs $75 821; P = .002), and educational attainment (31% vs 16%; P < .001). Conversely, CDs with higher proportions of the population being Indigenous were less likely to have CAIR IRs (5% vs 14%; P < .001).

Conclusion: CAIR member IRs are disproportionately concentrated in large urban centers, leaving substantial geographic disparities. Addressing this maldistribution will require coordinated strategies, including outreach models, telehealth integration, and national workforce planning.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized, validated instruments that measure how patients feel and function, collected directly from the patient. Traditionally, key metrics in radiology include technical aspects such as image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy. However, medical imaging and image-guided therapies shape patient experience in informational, emotional, physical, and logistical domains that are rarely measured. Failing to capture this information is an important gap in radiology research and practice today that needs to be addressed. This review synthesizes the science of PROMs through a radiology lens: what PROMs are; why PROMs are relevant to diagnostic imaging and interventional practice; how to select and interpret PROMs responsibly, with explicit attention to bias, conflicts of interest, and minimal important differences; and how to implement PROMs pragmatically using contemporary digital workflows. This article highlights radiology-specific frameworks for patient-centred outcomes of diagnostic tests, summarizes evidence on how electronic PROM (ePROM) programs can improve patient experience and clinical outcomes, and proposes a practical roadmap for department-level implementation. Throughout, this review aligns recommendations with current methodological and regulatory guidance, draws on Canadian implementation experience, and translates lessons from applied PROM programs in complex clinical services to radiology settings. Implemented thoughtfully, PROMs give radiologists a rigorous, low-burden way to document benefits radiology already provides, strengthen outcome and health-economic analyses, and co-design services around what patients value. Integrating PROMs alongside established technical and diagnostic metrics can extend radiology's value proposition, and make radiology's patient-centred impact visible, measurable, and improvable.