首页 > 最新文献

Brachytherapy最新文献

英文 中文
GSOR09 Presentation Time: 5:40 PM GSOR09 演讲时间:下午 5:40
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.055
Ramez Kouzy MD, Michael Rooney MD, Osama Mohamad MD, PhD, Christopher Weil MD, Lilie Lin MD, Anuja Jhingran MD, Patricia Eifel MD, Melissa Joyner MD, MBA, Lauren Colbert MD MSCR, Ann Klopp MD, PhD

Purpose

The utilization of artificial intelligence in analyzing patient discussions on online platforms can uncover valuable experiential data that are often overlooked in structured surveys. Sentiment analysis, a branch of natural language processing (NLP), interprets and classifies emotions within text, offering insights into patient sentiments as positive, negative, or neutral. This study aimed to apply AI techniques to analyze the sentiments of posts on a cervical cancer-related online forum, specifically focusing on discussions related to brachytherapy.

Materials/Methods

Utilizing a Reddit Application Programing Interface, we extracted posts and comments from the subreddit r/cervicalcancer, focusing on discussions about brachytherapy between November 2020 and January 2024. We then processed the data in multiple steps including cleaning, lowercasing, removing illegible text, and tokenization. We analyzed the entries using RoBERTa (Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Pretraining Approach), a sophisticated pre-trained deep learning model, to refine and categorize sentiments. The model assessed the probabilities of the posts being positive, negative, or neutral. We further evaluated and categorized posts using pre-defined keyword tagging to uncover dominant topics within the conversations. These topics were modeled based on recently published literature related to the experiences of patients undergoing cervical brachytherapy.

Results

The analysis encompassed 879 out of 1,073 unique textual entries. Of these, overall sentiments were categorized as 40.1% positive, 30.1% negative, and 29.8% neutral. A specific focus on 'Bowel Domain’ discussions revealed a predominance of negative sentiments (51.2%)—the highest across all topics. Similarly, 'Urinary Domain' (46.8%), 'Fatigue' (42.4%), 'Anesthesia' (41.4%), and 'Pain' (43.4%) discussions largely reflected negative sentiments. In contrast, 'Physical Therapy' and 'Survivorship' discussions were predominantly positive, with 51.2% and 45.5% of posts, respectively. The sentiments on 'Sex' and 'Mental Health' related topics displayed a more balanced distribution between positive and negative perspectives.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the value of using advanced AI models, such as sentiment analysis, to easily understand online patient discussions. These tools can bridge the gap between clinical insights and patient experiences, enhancing the feedback loop into clinical decisions, consent discussions, and patient education. Further research into the use of such models is necessary to fully leverage the insights they provide.
目的利用人工智能分析患者在网络平台上的讨论,可以发现结构化调查中经常忽略的宝贵经验数据。情感分析是自然语言处理(NLP)的一个分支,可对文本中的情感进行解释和分类,从而将患者的情感分为积极、消极或中性。本研究旨在应用人工智能技术分析宫颈癌相关在线论坛上帖子的情感,特别关注与近距离放射治疗相关的讨论。材料/方法利用 Reddit 应用程序接口,我们从子论坛 r/cervicalcancer 中提取了帖子和评论,重点关注 2020 年 11 月至 2024 年 1 月期间有关近距离放射治疗的讨论。然后,我们对数据进行了多个步骤的处理,包括清理、小写、删除难以辨认的文本以及标记化。我们使用预先训练好的深度学习模型 RoBERTa(Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Pretraining Approach)对条目进行分析,对情感进行细化和分类。该模型评估了帖子是正面、负面还是中性的概率。我们使用预定义的关键词标签对帖子进行了进一步评估和分类,以发现对话中的主要话题。这些主题是根据最近发表的与接受宫颈近距离治疗的患者的经历相关的文献建立的模型。其中,总体情绪分为 40.1%正面、30.1%负面和 29.8%中性。对 "肠道领域 "讨论的特别关注显示,负面情绪占主导地位(51.2%)--在所有主题中最高。同样,"排尿领域"(46.8%)、"疲劳"(42.4%)、"麻醉"(41.4%)和 "疼痛"(43.4%)的讨论在很大程度上反映了负面情绪。相比之下,"物理治疗 "和 "幸存者 "的讨论则以正面情绪为主,分别占 51.2% 和 45.5%。关于 "性 "和 "心理健康 "相关主题的情绪在正面和负面观点之间的分布更为均衡。这些工具可以弥合临床见解与患者体验之间的差距,加强临床决策、同意讨论和患者教育的反馈回路。有必要对此类模型的使用进行进一步研究,以充分利用它们所提供的洞察力。
{"title":"GSOR09 Presentation Time: 5:40 PM","authors":"Ramez Kouzy MD,&nbsp;Michael Rooney MD,&nbsp;Osama Mohamad MD, PhD,&nbsp;Christopher Weil MD,&nbsp;Lilie Lin MD,&nbsp;Anuja Jhingran MD,&nbsp;Patricia Eifel MD,&nbsp;Melissa Joyner MD, MBA,&nbsp;Lauren Colbert MD MSCR,&nbsp;Ann Klopp MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.055","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.055","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The utilization of artificial intelligence in analyzing patient discussions on online platforms can uncover valuable experiential data that are often overlooked in structured surveys. Sentiment analysis, a branch of natural language processing (NLP), interprets and classifies emotions within text, offering insights into patient sentiments as positive, negative, or neutral. This study aimed to apply AI techniques to analyze the sentiments of posts on a cervical cancer-related online forum, specifically focusing on discussions related to brachytherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Utilizing a Reddit Application Programing Interface, we extracted posts and comments from the subreddit r/cervicalcancer, focusing on discussions about brachytherapy between November 2020 and January 2024. We then processed the data in multiple steps including cleaning, lowercasing, removing illegible text, and tokenization. We analyzed the entries using RoBERTa (Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Pretraining Approach), a sophisticated pre-trained deep learning model, to refine and categorize sentiments. The model assessed the probabilities of the posts being positive, negative, or neutral. We further evaluated and categorized posts using pre-defined keyword tagging to uncover dominant topics within the conversations. These topics were modeled based on recently published literature related to the experiences of patients undergoing cervical brachytherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis encompassed 879 out of 1,073 unique textual entries. Of these, overall sentiments were categorized as 40.1% positive, 30.1% negative, and 29.8% neutral. A specific focus on 'Bowel Domain’ discussions revealed a predominance of negative sentiments (51.2%)—the highest across all topics. Similarly, 'Urinary Domain' (46.8%), 'Fatigue' (42.4%), 'Anesthesia' (41.4%), and 'Pain' (43.4%) discussions largely reflected negative sentiments. In contrast, 'Physical Therapy' and 'Survivorship' discussions were predominantly positive, with 51.2% and 45.5% of posts, respectively. The sentiments on 'Sex' and 'Mental Health' related topics displayed a more balanced distribution between positive and negative perspectives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates the value of using advanced AI models, such as sentiment analysis, to easily understand online patient discussions. These tools can bridge the gap between clinical insights and patient experiences, enhancing the feedback loop into clinical decisions, consent discussions, and patient education. Further research into the use of such models is necessary to fully leverage the insights they provide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MSOR08 Presentation Time: 8:35 AM MSOR08 演讲时间:上午 8:35
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.070
Emily MacDuffie MD , Joy Ogunmuyiwa MD , Michael LeCompte MD , Kelsey Corrigan MD , Abhishek Kumar MD , Mustafa Basree DO , Amishi Bajaj MD , Andrew Farach MD , Jenna Kahn MD , Mitchell Kamrava MD , Idalid Franco MD, MPH
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) annual survey aims to better understand graduating radiation oncology (RO) residents’ perceptions of their training programs and readiness to enter practice. Residents graduating from US training institutions between 2020-2023 were asked about their confidence in performing brachytherapy (BT) by the completion of their residency program.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Postgraduate year five RO residents were emailed a 50-56 question survey in May of their graduating year. Questions regarding brachytherapy asked respondents to describe their level of training and degree of comfort to practice high-dose rate (HDR) intracavitary and interstitial gynecological BT as well as HDR and low-dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy after graduation. They were also asked to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their training program. Responses were analyzed and compared. Differences between groups were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses. Ordinal variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average response rate was 87.0% (77.8%-94.2%) and the total number of responses collected was 655. Confidence in delivering HDR interstitial and intracavitary gynecological BT rated as sufficient or adequate was 73.4% and 92.7%, respectively, while no or minimal training was 4.7% and <1%, respectively (Figure 1). Sufficient or adequate confidence in practicing HDR and LDR prostate brachytherapy was 40.9% and 43.5%, respectively, while no or minimal training was 42.1% and 29.9%, respectively. Confidence did not differ across survey years for any type of BT. Increased comfort in delivery of interstitial gynecological BT was associated with respondents’ satisfaction with treatment plan evaluation training (p<0.001), overall program training (p<0.001), clinical didactics (p<0.001), and faculty teaching (p<0.001). Intracavitary gynecological BT confidence was associated with residency size (p<0.001) and satisfaction with treatment plan evaluation training (p=0.001). Confidence in LDR prostate BT delivery was associated with satisfaction in treatment plan evaluation training (p<0.001) and residency size (p=0.001). There were no associations between HDR prostate BT comfort and program features or resident satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Over three-quarters of RO residents graduating from 2020-2023 reported at least adequate training and comfort in performing gynecological BT. However, fewer than half of residents reported adequate training in prostate BT and a similar proportion reported little or no training at all during their residency, suggesting a potential training gap in prostate BT for US residents. Several factors were associated with increased confidence in these procedures; most notably the level of resident-reported satisfaction in th
目的放射肿瘤学住院医师协会(ARRO)的年度调查旨在更好地了解即将毕业的放射肿瘤学(RO)住院医师对其培训项目的看法以及进入临床的准备情况。调查询问了 2020-2023 年间从美国培训机构毕业的住院医师在完成住院医师培训项目后对近距离放射治疗 (BT) 的信心。有关近距离放射治疗的问题要求受访者描述他们所接受的培训水平以及毕业后从事高剂量率(HDR)腔内和间质妇科近距离放射治疗以及高剂量率和低剂量率(LDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗的舒适度。他们还被要求对培训计划的各个方面进行满意度评分。我们对他们的回答进行了分析和比较。组间差异采用描述性统计和卡方分析法进行分析。结果平均回复率为 87.0%(77.8%-94.2%),收集到的回复总数为 655 份。对实施 HDR 妇科间质和腔内 BT 有充分或足够信心的比例分别为 73.4% 和 92.7%,而未接受过培训或培训很少的比例分别为 4.7% 和 <1%(图 1)。对HDR和LDR前列腺近距离放射治疗有充分或足够信心的比例分别为40.9%和43.5%,而未接受过培训或仅接受过少量培训的比例分别为42.1%和29.9%。不同调查年份对任何一种近距离放射治疗的信心均无差异。妇科腔内 BT 治疗舒适度的提高与受访者对治疗方案评估培训(p<0.001)、整个项目培训(p<0.001)、临床教学(p<0.001)和教师教学(p<0.001)的满意度有关。妇科腔内 BT 信心与住院医师规模(p<0.001)和治疗计划评估培训满意度(p=0.001)相关。对 LDR 前列腺 BT 治疗的信心与治疗计划评估培训的满意度(p<0.001)和住院医师人数(p=0.001)有关。结论2020-2023年毕业的放射科住院医师中,超过四分之三的人表示至少接受过足够的培训,并能自如地进行妇科BT手术。然而,只有不到一半的住院医师表示在前列腺 BT 方面接受过充分的培训,类似比例的住院医师表示在住院医师培训期间很少或根本没有接受过培训,这表明美国住院医师在前列腺 BT 方面可能存在培训缺口。有几个因素与住院医师对这些手术的信心增加有关;最值得注意的是,住院医师对治疗方案评估培训的满意度与他们对妇科 BT 和 LDR 前列腺 BT 的信心有关。至关重要的是,RO 住院医师培训应包含足够的 BT 培训内容,这样毕业生在进入临床后才能对自己的技能充满信心。
{"title":"MSOR08 Presentation Time: 8:35 AM","authors":"Emily MacDuffie MD ,&nbsp;Joy Ogunmuyiwa MD ,&nbsp;Michael LeCompte MD ,&nbsp;Kelsey Corrigan MD ,&nbsp;Abhishek Kumar MD ,&nbsp;Mustafa Basree DO ,&nbsp;Amishi Bajaj MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Farach MD ,&nbsp;Jenna Kahn MD ,&nbsp;Mitchell Kamrava MD ,&nbsp;Idalid Franco MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.070","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.070","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) annual survey aims to better understand graduating radiation oncology (RO) residents’ perceptions of their training programs and readiness to enter practice. Residents graduating from US training institutions between 2020-2023 were asked about their confidence in performing brachytherapy (BT) by the completion of their residency program.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Postgraduate year five RO residents were emailed a 50-56 question survey in May of their graduating year. Questions regarding brachytherapy asked respondents to describe their level of training and degree of comfort to practice high-dose rate (HDR) intracavitary and interstitial gynecological BT as well as HDR and low-dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy after graduation. They were also asked to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their training program. Responses were analyzed and compared. Differences between groups were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses. Ordinal variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The average response rate was 87.0% (77.8%-94.2%) and the total number of responses collected was 655. Confidence in delivering HDR interstitial and intracavitary gynecological BT rated as sufficient or adequate was 73.4% and 92.7%, respectively, while no or minimal training was 4.7% and &lt;1%, respectively (Figure 1). Sufficient or adequate confidence in practicing HDR and LDR prostate brachytherapy was 40.9% and 43.5%, respectively, while no or minimal training was 42.1% and 29.9%, respectively. Confidence did not differ across survey years for any type of BT. Increased comfort in delivery of interstitial gynecological BT was associated with respondents’ satisfaction with treatment plan evaluation training (p&lt;0.001), overall program training (p&lt;0.001), clinical didactics (p&lt;0.001), and faculty teaching (p&lt;0.001). Intracavitary gynecological BT confidence was associated with residency size (p&lt;0.001) and satisfaction with treatment plan evaluation training (p=0.001). Confidence in LDR prostate BT delivery was associated with satisfaction in treatment plan evaluation training (p&lt;0.001) and residency size (p=0.001). There were no associations between HDR prostate BT comfort and program features or resident satisfaction.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Over three-quarters of RO residents graduating from 2020-2023 reported at least adequate training and comfort in performing gynecological BT. However, fewer than half of residents reported adequate training in prostate BT and a similar proportion reported little or no training at all during their residency, suggesting a potential training gap in prostate BT for US residents. Several factors were associated with increased confidence in these procedures; most notably the level of resident-reported satisfaction in th","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MSOR09 Presentation Time: 8:40 AM MSOR09 演讲时间:上午 8:40
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.071
Kristin Hsieh MD , Catherine Yu BA , Drishti Panse MD , Juliana Runnels MD , Anthony Nehlsen MD , Lucas Resende Salgado MD , Jared P. Rowley MD , Kunal K. Sindhu MD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brachytherapy is an essential treatment modality utilized in the management of several malignancies. However, its usage has been declining in the United States, which may be due, in part, to insufficient brachytherapy training for radiation oncology residents. The 1-year, post-residency brachytherapy fellowship has been offered to those interested in gaining additional training in brachytherapy procedures. The characteristics of individuals who choose to pursue this fellowship after graduating from US radiation oncology residency programs, however, are not well understood. In this study, we sought to better understand the characteristics and job outcomes of this cohort of individuals in order to provide further guidance to current US radiation oncology residents who are considering this fellowship.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We created a comprehensive database of individuals who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited radiation oncology residency training program in the US between 2015 and 2022 and subsequently completed a radiation oncology fellowship. We utilized information from multiple publicly available sources in building this database, including residency/fellow training program websites, hospital/institutional websites, Doximity, LinkedIn, and the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System National Provider Identifier Registry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 78 individuals who completed a radiation oncology fellowship during the time period analyzed, of whom 14 (17.9%) completed brachytherapy-focused fellowships (13 individuals completed dedicated brachytherapy fellowships, and 1 brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy fellowship) at five different institutions. Nine individuals (64.3%) were men and five (35.7%) were women, and 11 individuals (78.6%) trained at the same two institutions for fellowship. Four individuals graduated from large-sized residency programs (≥4 graduates per year), 6 from medium-sized programs (1.5-4 graduates per year), and 4 from small-sized programs (≤1.5 graduates per year). 5 individuals completed residency between 2015 and 2016, 4 between 2017 and 2018, 2 between 2019 and 2020, and 3 between 2021 and 2022. We identified the post-fellowship employment positions accepted by 13 of the 14 fellows (92.9%), While all thirteen currently work as radiation oncologists, only 9 (64.3%) have brachytherapy listed as an area of focus or clinical expertise on their employment websites. 10 individuals (71.4%) practice in academic settings, while 3 (21.4%) practice in non-academic settings. 11 individuals (78.6%) have remained in the same job since graduating from fellowship, while 2 (14.3%) have changed jobs at least once. 3 individuals (23.1%) accepted their first clinical employment position at the same institution from which they graduated from fellowship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3
目的 近距离放射治疗是治疗多种恶性肿瘤的重要治疗方式。然而,近距离放射治疗在美国的使用率却在下降,部分原因可能是放射肿瘤学住院医师的近距离放射治疗培训不足。为那些有兴趣在近距离放射治疗程序方面获得更多培训的人提供了为期一年的住院后近距离放射治疗奖学金。然而,从美国放射肿瘤学住院医师培训项目毕业后选择继续深造的人员的特点却不甚了解。在这项研究中,我们试图更好地了解这部分人的特点和工作结果,以便为正在考虑从事该研究的美国放射肿瘤学住院医师提供进一步的指导。材料与方法我们建立了一个综合数据库,收录了在2015年至2022年期间完成美国医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的放射肿瘤学住院医师培训项目并随后完成放射肿瘤学研究的人员。在建立该数据库时,我们利用了多个公开来源的信息,包括住院医师/研究员培训项目网站、医院/机构网站、Doximity、LinkedIn 和国家计划与提供者枚举系统(National Plan and Provider Enumeration System National Provider Identifier Registry)。结果我们发现78人在分析期间完成了放射肿瘤学研究金,其中14人(17.9%)在5个不同的机构完成了以近距离治疗为重点的研究金(13人完成了专门的近距离治疗研究金,1人完成了近距离治疗和立体定向体放射治疗研究金)。9人(64.3%)为男性,5人(35.7%)为女性,11人(78.6%)在同两家机构接受了研究金培训。4人毕业于大型住院医师培训项目(每年毕业人数≥4人),6人毕业于中型项目(每年毕业人数1.5-4人),4人毕业于小型项目(每年毕业人数≤1.5人)。5 人在 2015 年至 2016 年期间完成住院实习,4 人在 2017 年至 2018 年期间完成住院实习,2 人在 2019 年至 2020 年期间完成住院实习,3 人在 2021 年至 2022 年期间完成住院实习。我们确定了 14 名研究员中 13 人(92.9%)接受的研究员后就业岗位,虽然这 13 人目前都是放射肿瘤专家,但只有 9 人(64.3%)在其就业网站上将近距离放射治疗列为重点领域或临床专长。10人(71.4%)在学术机构工作,3人(21.4%)在非学术机构工作。11 人(78.6%)从研究员职位毕业后一直从事同一份工作,2 人(14.3%)至少换过一次工作。结论在这项研究中,我们发现从美国放射肿瘤住院医师培训项目毕业并继续完成近距离放射治疗研究的人员中,有相当一部分人没有在其当前就业网站上将近距离放射治疗列为其专业领域。虽然其中至少有一部分人可能会继续执行近距离治疗程序,但这一发现令人担忧这些人在完成研究金后是否会继续参与近距离治疗领域的工作。鉴于近距离放射治疗在治疗多种恶性肿瘤患者方面的重要性,以及近距离放射治疗在美国使用率的下降,应考虑努力提高这些人员在该领域的留用比例。此外,还需要进一步研究外国住院医师毕业生(据悉他们也会在美国完成放射肿瘤学研究)和美国近距离放射治疗协会 "10 年 300 人 "计划参与者的影响,该计划在住院医师培训期间提供为期 2 个月的近距离放射治疗选修课。
{"title":"MSOR09 Presentation Time: 8:40 AM","authors":"Kristin Hsieh MD ,&nbsp;Catherine Yu BA ,&nbsp;Drishti Panse MD ,&nbsp;Juliana Runnels MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Nehlsen MD ,&nbsp;Lucas Resende Salgado MD ,&nbsp;Jared P. Rowley MD ,&nbsp;Kunal K. Sindhu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.071","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.071","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Brachytherapy is an essential treatment modality utilized in the management of several malignancies. However, its usage has been declining in the United States, which may be due, in part, to insufficient brachytherapy training for radiation oncology residents. The 1-year, post-residency brachytherapy fellowship has been offered to those interested in gaining additional training in brachytherapy procedures. The characteristics of individuals who choose to pursue this fellowship after graduating from US radiation oncology residency programs, however, are not well understood. In this study, we sought to better understand the characteristics and job outcomes of this cohort of individuals in order to provide further guidance to current US radiation oncology residents who are considering this fellowship.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We created a comprehensive database of individuals who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited radiation oncology residency training program in the US between 2015 and 2022 and subsequently completed a radiation oncology fellowship. We utilized information from multiple publicly available sources in building this database, including residency/fellow training program websites, hospital/institutional websites, Doximity, LinkedIn, and the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System National Provider Identifier Registry.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We identified 78 individuals who completed a radiation oncology fellowship during the time period analyzed, of whom 14 (17.9%) completed brachytherapy-focused fellowships (13 individuals completed dedicated brachytherapy fellowships, and 1 brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy fellowship) at five different institutions. Nine individuals (64.3%) were men and five (35.7%) were women, and 11 individuals (78.6%) trained at the same two institutions for fellowship. Four individuals graduated from large-sized residency programs (≥4 graduates per year), 6 from medium-sized programs (1.5-4 graduates per year), and 4 from small-sized programs (≤1.5 graduates per year). 5 individuals completed residency between 2015 and 2016, 4 between 2017 and 2018, 2 between 2019 and 2020, and 3 between 2021 and 2022. We identified the post-fellowship employment positions accepted by 13 of the 14 fellows (92.9%), While all thirteen currently work as radiation oncologists, only 9 (64.3%) have brachytherapy listed as an area of focus or clinical expertise on their employment websites. 10 individuals (71.4%) practice in academic settings, while 3 (21.4%) practice in non-academic settings. 11 individuals (78.6%) have remained in the same job since graduating from fellowship, while 2 (14.3%) have changed jobs at least once. 3 individuals (23.1%) accepted their first clinical employment position at the same institution from which they graduated from fellowship.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MSOR03 Presentation Time: 8:10 AM MSOR03 演讲时间:上午 8:10
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.066
Mustafa Al Balushi MD FRCPC, Martin T. King MD PhD, Joel E. Goldberg MD MPH, Simon G. Talbot MD, Kee-Young Shin MS, Yu-Hui Chen MS, Harvey J. Mamon MD PhD, Phillip M. Devlin MD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Despite advances in surgical techniques and multimodality therapy for anal canal and rectal cancers, local recurrence and unresectable disease remain a significant challenge, often associated with poor quality of life. It is not clear how best to address this entity in the absence of large prospective randomized trials. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes and toxicities of pelvic low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR) combined with surgical resection in patients with unresectable and locally recurrent anorectal cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Following IRB approval, patients with biopsy-proven anorectal cancers who underwent LDR during surgery for unresectable or locally recurrent anorectal cancers from 2004 to 2022 were included. Patients who had LDR for recurrent gynecological or genitourinary cancers were excluded. For all patients, the intent of surgery was complete resection of all visible disease. This was followed by LDR, either in the surgical bed for recurrent cancers or the site of microscopically positive margins for the unresectable patients. Following LDR mesh fixation with sutures, an omental flap was draped over the site of LDR to prevent seed migration and to minimize dose to organs at risk. Toxicity grading was done using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 29 eligible patients, 20 underwent Iodine-125 LDR, and 9 received Cesium-131 LDR with an average of 73.8 sources used per patient. The primary site was colorectal in 79.3% and anal canal in 20.7%. 27 (93.1%) of the patients had pelvic only disease at the time of LDR and surgery. 21 (72.4%) patients had at least 1 surgery prior to the implant prior to the implant, whereas 8 (27.6%) patients had no surgery prior to the implant. Brachytherapy was offered at recurrence in 23 patients (79.3%) and in 6 (20.7%) patients who were considered unresectable initially. In those with recurrences, 20 (87.0%) had LDR offered during their first recurrence and the rest were offered LDR at subsequent recurrences. Chemotherapy was offered at first recurrence in 21 (91.3%) patients. No Grade 4 or 5 toxicities were reported. The most common adverse event seen was neuralgia in 12 (41.4%) patients with 2 of those developing Grade 3 neuralgia. The rate of Grade 2 gastrointestinal fistula was 5 (17.2%) and Grade 2 urinary fistula was 3 (10.3%). All of the patients who developed fistulas were diverted at the time of surgery and LDR or before, and did not require additional invasive interventions. The 12 month and 24 month local progression free survival were 55.4% (95% CI: 34.9-71.8) and 41.7% (95% CI: 22.3 - 60.1), respectively. The 12 month and 24 month progression free survival were 38.4% (95% CI: 20.7-55.9) and 25.6% (95% CI: 10.9-43.3), respectively. The 12 month and 24 month overall survival rates were 88.7% (95% CI: 69.0-96.2) and 70.6% (95%
目的尽管肛管癌和直肠癌的手术技术和多模式疗法不断进步,但局部复发和无法切除的疾病仍是一个重大挑战,而且往往与生活质量低下有关。在缺乏大型前瞻性随机试验的情况下,如何最有效地解决这一问题尚不清楚。本研究旨在回顾性评估盆腔低剂量近距离放射治疗(LDR)与手术切除相结合治疗不可切除和局部复发肛门直肠癌患者的效果和毒性。因妇科或泌尿生殖系统癌症复发而接受 LDR 的患者除外。所有患者的手术目的都是完全切除所有可见病灶。随后进行 LDR,复发癌症患者在手术床上进行,无法切除的患者则在显微镜下边缘阳性的部位进行。用缝线固定LDR网片后,在LDR部位铺上网膜瓣,以防止种子移位,并尽量减少对危险器官的剂量。结果29名符合条件的患者中,20名接受了碘-125 LDR,9名接受了铯-131 LDR,平均每名患者使用73.8个放射源。79.3%的患者的原发部位是结肠直肠,20.7%的患者的原发部位是肛管。27名患者(93.1%)在接受 LDR 和手术时仅患有盆腔疾病。21名患者(72.4%)在植入前至少做过一次手术,8名患者(27.6%)在植入前没有做过手术。23名患者(79.3%)和6名(20.7%)最初被认为无法切除的患者在复发时接受了近距离放射治疗。在复发患者中,20 名患者(87.0%)在首次复发时接受了 LDR 治疗,其余患者在随后的复发中接受了 LDR 治疗。21例(91.3%)患者在首次复发时接受了化疗。无 4 级或 5 级毒性反应报告。最常见的不良反应是神经痛,有12例(41.4%)患者出现了3级神经痛,其中2例为3级。2级胃肠道瘘为5例(17.2%),2级泌尿道瘘为3例(10.3%)。所有出现瘘管的患者都在手术和 LDR 时或之前进行了引流,不需要额外的侵入性干预。12个月和24个月的局部无进展生存率分别为55.4%(95% CI:34.9-71.8)和41.7%(95% CI:22.3-60.1)。12个月和24个月的无进展生存期分别为38.4%(95% CI:20.7-55.9)和25.6%(95% CI:10.9-43.3)。12个月和24个月的总生存率分别为88.7%(95% CI:69.0-96.2)和70.6%(95% CI:47.7-84.9)。结论对于无法切除或局部复发的肛门直肠癌,LDR联合切除所有大体病灶是一种可行的治疗方案。毒性是可以接受的,本组患者中没有出现4级或5级不良反应。由于出现瘘管的患者已经进行了转流,因此对瘘管进行了预期处理。此外,尚不清楚瘘管的形成是 LDR 的不良反应还是局部肿瘤进展所致。12个月和24个月的无进展生存期和总生存期与之前的回顾性报告一致。我们的研究是一项样本量较小的回顾性研究,因此存在一定的局限性。不过,这些研究结果令人鼓舞,值得进一步开展前瞻性研究,以指导这些异质性且往往具有挑战性的病例的治疗。
{"title":"MSOR03 Presentation Time: 8:10 AM","authors":"Mustafa Al Balushi MD FRCPC,&nbsp;Martin T. King MD PhD,&nbsp;Joel E. Goldberg MD MPH,&nbsp;Simon G. Talbot MD,&nbsp;Kee-Young Shin MS,&nbsp;Yu-Hui Chen MS,&nbsp;Harvey J. Mamon MD PhD,&nbsp;Phillip M. Devlin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.066","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.066","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Despite advances in surgical techniques and multimodality therapy for anal canal and rectal cancers, local recurrence and unresectable disease remain a significant challenge, often associated with poor quality of life. It is not clear how best to address this entity in the absence of large prospective randomized trials. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes and toxicities of pelvic low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR) combined with surgical resection in patients with unresectable and locally recurrent anorectal cancers.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Following IRB approval, patients with biopsy-proven anorectal cancers who underwent LDR during surgery for unresectable or locally recurrent anorectal cancers from 2004 to 2022 were included. Patients who had LDR for recurrent gynecological or genitourinary cancers were excluded. For all patients, the intent of surgery was complete resection of all visible disease. This was followed by LDR, either in the surgical bed for recurrent cancers or the site of microscopically positive margins for the unresectable patients. Following LDR mesh fixation with sutures, an omental flap was draped over the site of LDR to prevent seed migration and to minimize dose to organs at risk. Toxicity grading was done using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Out of 29 eligible patients, 20 underwent Iodine-125 LDR, and 9 received Cesium-131 LDR with an average of 73.8 sources used per patient. The primary site was colorectal in 79.3% and anal canal in 20.7%. 27 (93.1%) of the patients had pelvic only disease at the time of LDR and surgery. 21 (72.4%) patients had at least 1 surgery prior to the implant prior to the implant, whereas 8 (27.6%) patients had no surgery prior to the implant. Brachytherapy was offered at recurrence in 23 patients (79.3%) and in 6 (20.7%) patients who were considered unresectable initially. In those with recurrences, 20 (87.0%) had LDR offered during their first recurrence and the rest were offered LDR at subsequent recurrences. Chemotherapy was offered at first recurrence in 21 (91.3%) patients. No Grade 4 or 5 toxicities were reported. The most common adverse event seen was neuralgia in 12 (41.4%) patients with 2 of those developing Grade 3 neuralgia. The rate of Grade 2 gastrointestinal fistula was 5 (17.2%) and Grade 2 urinary fistula was 3 (10.3%). All of the patients who developed fistulas were diverted at the time of surgery and LDR or before, and did not require additional invasive interventions. The 12 month and 24 month local progression free survival were 55.4% (95% CI: 34.9-71.8) and 41.7% (95% CI: 22.3 - 60.1), respectively. The 12 month and 24 month progression free survival were 38.4% (95% CI: 20.7-55.9) and 25.6% (95% CI: 10.9-43.3), respectively. The 12 month and 24 month overall survival rates were 88.7% (95% CI: 69.0-96.2) and 70.6% (95%","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S51-S52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thursday, July 11, 20245:00 PM - 6:00 PMMSOR1 Presentation Time: 5:00 PM 2024 年 7 月 11 日(星期四)下午 5:00 - 下午 6:00MSOR1 演讲时间:下午 5:00
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.035
Aaron Silvus MS, Ethan Memming BS, Thomas R. Mazur PhD, Liyun Chen PhD, Marlene Campos Guerrero BS, Jacqueline E. Zoberi PhD, Jessika Contreras MD, Stephanie Markovina MD, PhD, Michael B. Altman PhD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>HDR brachytherapy is an integral part of radiation therapy and is used jointly with EBRT in the treatment of numerous cancers including cervical cancer. For targets jointly treated with HDR and EBRT, ICRU 89 recommends the use of an EQD2 assessment on the accumulated dose between EBRT and brachytherapy fractions, assuming equivalent RBE between EBRT and HDR. Recent studies have shown that RBE can vary with photon energy, however, whether these differences in RBE translate to different biologic effects in cervical cancer, among others, have yet to be well studied. The goal of this study is to investigate biological endpoints in cervical cancer cell lines for an HDR remote afterloader and a clinical linear accelerator.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We developed a portable 3D printed platform allowing for the joint study of clinical HDR brachytherapy (Bravos, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and clinical EBRT (Edge, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Gamma-H2AX (gH2AX) foci formation and clonogenic survival assays were performed in an effort to characterize the biological effects of clinical irradiators commonly used to treat cervical cancer in three cervical cancer cell lines: HT3, CasKi, and SW756. Cells were irradiated using the 3D printed platform for both HDR and EBRT irradiations, as the design can accommodate cells plated in a standard sized tissue culture plate which can be irradiated by up to 14 HDR source channels or by clinical EBRT irradiators. GH2AX foci were quantified to estimate DNA double strand breaks at two post irradiation time points: 30 minutes for early damage and 24 hours as a surrogate for DNA repair capacity. Clonogenic survival was determined 10-14 days after RT (n > 50 cells). For HDR irradiations, a dose of 4 Gy (gH2AX) or 6 Gy (clonogenic survival) was delivered at a source-to-cell distance (SCD) of 0.4 cm and 1 cm giving dose rates of 30-50 Gy/min and 3-5 Gy/min, respectively. EBRT irradiations uniformly delivered 4 Gy (gH2AX) or 6 Gy (clonogenic survival) to a 96-well tissue culture plate with a single anterior/posterior 15 × 15 cm<sup>2</sup> field at a 100 cm source-to-axis distance. Statistical analysis was performed using the one way ANOVA statistical test (p < 0.05) with Tukey's multiple comparisons test and the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05) for the gH2AX assay and the clonogenic survival assay, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 30 minutes, all irradiated groups had significantly more gH2AX foci than their respective control groups. There were no statistically significant differences in this cohort between modalities for HT3 at either 30 minutes or 24 hours. For CasKi and SW756, EBRT had significantly fewer gH2AX foci than HDR at 0.4 cm SCD and 1 cm SCD. In terms of clonogenic survival for HT3, the EBRT treated cells had a significantly higher survival fraction than those treated with HDR at 0.4 cm SCD but not 1 cm SCD. CasKi
目的 HDR 近距离放射治疗是放射治疗的一个组成部分,与 EBRT 联合用于包括宫颈癌在内的多种癌症的治疗。对于采用 HDR 和 EBRT 联合治疗的目标,ICRU 89 建议使用 EQD2 评估 EBRT 和近距离放射治疗分次之间的累积剂量,并假设 EBRT 和 HDR 的 RBE 相等。最近的研究表明,RBE 会随光子能量的变化而变化,但这些 RBE 的差异是否会对宫颈癌等产生不同的生物效应,还有待深入研究。我们开发了一个便携式 3D 打印平台,用于联合研究临床 HDR 近距离放射治疗(Bravos,瓦里安医疗系统公司,加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托)和临床 EBRT(Edge,瓦里安医疗系统公司,加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托)。在三种宫颈癌细胞系中进行了伽马-H2AX(gH2AX)病灶形成和克隆生成存活试验,以确定治疗宫颈癌的临床常用辐照剂的生物效应特征:HT3、CasKi 和 SW756。使用三维打印平台对细胞进行 HDR 和 EBRT 照射,因为该设计可容纳标准尺寸组织培养板中的细胞,并可通过多达 14 个 HDR 源通道或临床 EBRT 照射器进行照射。对 GH2AX 病灶进行量化,以估计辐照后两个时间点的 DNA 双链断裂情况:30分钟检测早期损伤,24小时检测DNA修复能力。RT后10-14天测定克隆存活率(n > 50个细胞)。对于 HDR 照射,剂量为 4 Gy(gH2AX)或 6 Gy(克隆存活),源到细胞的距离(SCD)分别为 0.4 厘米和 1 厘米,剂量率分别为 30-50 Gy/min 和 3-5 Gy/min。EBRT照射将4Gy(gH2AX)或6Gy(克隆存活)的剂量均匀地投射到96孔组织培养板上,该培养板有一个前/后15 × 15平方厘米的单个区域,放射源到轴的距离为100厘米。对于 gH2AX 检测和克隆存活检测,分别使用单向方差分析统计检验(p < 0.05)和 Tukey's 多重比较检验以及 Mann-Whitney U 检验(p < 0.05)进行统计分析。在 30 分钟或 24 小时内,HT3 的不同模式组间差异均无统计学意义。对于 CasKi 和 SW756,在 0.4 厘米 SCD 和 1 厘米 SCD 时,EBRT 的 gH2AX 病灶明显少于 HDR。就 HT3 的克隆存活率而言,在 0.4 厘米 SCD 和 1 厘米 SCD 下,EBRT 处理细胞的存活率明显高于 HDR 处理细胞。与 0.4 厘米 SCD 和 1 厘米 SCD 条件下的 HDR 相比,EBRT 处理 CasKi 的存活率明显更高。SW756细胞系的克隆存活率数据正在进行中。结论使用相同剂量但不同的模式,我们发现与HDR相比,EBRT诱导的gH2AX病灶更少,克隆存活率更高,且与细胞系相关。这些数据表明,在治疗宫颈癌时可以利用依赖于模式的放射生物学差异。
{"title":"Thursday, July 11, 20245:00 PM - 6:00 PMMSOR1 Presentation Time: 5:00 PM","authors":"Aaron Silvus MS,&nbsp;Ethan Memming BS,&nbsp;Thomas R. Mazur PhD,&nbsp;Liyun Chen PhD,&nbsp;Marlene Campos Guerrero BS,&nbsp;Jacqueline E. Zoberi PhD,&nbsp;Jessika Contreras MD,&nbsp;Stephanie Markovina MD, PhD,&nbsp;Michael B. Altman PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.035","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.035","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;HDR brachytherapy is an integral part of radiation therapy and is used jointly with EBRT in the treatment of numerous cancers including cervical cancer. For targets jointly treated with HDR and EBRT, ICRU 89 recommends the use of an EQD2 assessment on the accumulated dose between EBRT and brachytherapy fractions, assuming equivalent RBE between EBRT and HDR. Recent studies have shown that RBE can vary with photon energy, however, whether these differences in RBE translate to different biologic effects in cervical cancer, among others, have yet to be well studied. The goal of this study is to investigate biological endpoints in cervical cancer cell lines for an HDR remote afterloader and a clinical linear accelerator.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We developed a portable 3D printed platform allowing for the joint study of clinical HDR brachytherapy (Bravos, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and clinical EBRT (Edge, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Gamma-H2AX (gH2AX) foci formation and clonogenic survival assays were performed in an effort to characterize the biological effects of clinical irradiators commonly used to treat cervical cancer in three cervical cancer cell lines: HT3, CasKi, and SW756. Cells were irradiated using the 3D printed platform for both HDR and EBRT irradiations, as the design can accommodate cells plated in a standard sized tissue culture plate which can be irradiated by up to 14 HDR source channels or by clinical EBRT irradiators. GH2AX foci were quantified to estimate DNA double strand breaks at two post irradiation time points: 30 minutes for early damage and 24 hours as a surrogate for DNA repair capacity. Clonogenic survival was determined 10-14 days after RT (n &gt; 50 cells). For HDR irradiations, a dose of 4 Gy (gH2AX) or 6 Gy (clonogenic survival) was delivered at a source-to-cell distance (SCD) of 0.4 cm and 1 cm giving dose rates of 30-50 Gy/min and 3-5 Gy/min, respectively. EBRT irradiations uniformly delivered 4 Gy (gH2AX) or 6 Gy (clonogenic survival) to a 96-well tissue culture plate with a single anterior/posterior 15 × 15 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; field at a 100 cm source-to-axis distance. Statistical analysis was performed using the one way ANOVA statistical test (p &lt; 0.05) with Tukey's multiple comparisons test and the Mann-Whitney U test (p &lt; 0.05) for the gH2AX assay and the clonogenic survival assay, respectively.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;At 30 minutes, all irradiated groups had significantly more gH2AX foci than their respective control groups. There were no statistically significant differences in this cohort between modalities for HT3 at either 30 minutes or 24 hours. For CasKi and SW756, EBRT had significantly fewer gH2AX foci than HDR at 0.4 cm SCD and 1 cm SCD. In terms of clonogenic survival for HT3, the EBRT treated cells had a significantly higher survival fraction than those treated with HDR at 0.4 cm SCD but not 1 cm SCD. CasKi ","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MSOR2 Presentation Time: 5:05 PM MSOR2 演讲时间:下午 5:05
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.036
Mahdokht Akbari Taemeh PhD Candidate , Théophraste Lescot M.Sc. , Marc-André Fortin Ing., Ph.D.
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Personalized 3D-printed brachytherapy (BT) implants and advanced dose painting methods for better-targeting tumor geometry, could improve BT outcomes<sup>1</sup>. One challenge in this approach is the necessity of measuring the dose profile for each device, before implantation. Polymer gel dosimeters (PGD) could meet the dosimetry challenges of personalized BT devices. However, PGDs have been mainly used in external beam therapy applications and at high-energy photons; by comparison for low-dose-rate (LDR) BT, low-energy photons (LEP) raise issues of water equivalency, energy response<sup>2a</sup> and longer exposure times. In this study, a homogeneous PGD formulation based on methacrylic acid (MAA, the reactive monomer) was optimized to meet these challenges. A dosimetry assessment methodology was elaborated for LDR-BT devices, involving the measurement of gel response to LEP using MRI (3 magnetic fields: 1, 1.5, 3T) and experimental dose profiles were generated in PGDs upon exposure to 3D-printed plaques containing <sup>125</sup>I seeds and numerically plotted in 3D.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div><em>Single Seed Experiment (SSE):</em> a MAGIC-f gel formulation<sup>3</sup> was optimized by adding 0.75 %w/w paraformaldehyde (PF) as gelatin crosslinker. Gelatin and PF were dissolved in pure water and mixed at 45°C. CopperII sulfate pentahydrate, L-ascorbic acid and MAA were added at 37°C. The solution was gelified in a glass container at 4°C overnight. Formed gels were exposed to a <sup>125</sup>I seed (OncoSeed 6711, activity: 2.13 mCi; n=3) placed in a fixed glass tube for 54h at RT (Fig1a). The gels were MRI-scanned (<em>T<sub>2</sub></em>-w) with 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm<sup>3</sup> voxel size using 1T, 1.5T and 3T MRI (TR/TE= 3585(1T)-4350(1.5T)-5410(3T)/22-352ms). <em>T<sub>2</sub></em> (=1/ <em>R<sub>2</sub></em>) maps were generated across the vial axial plane. The TOPAS Monte Carlo (MC) code toolkit was used to calculate the absolute dose deposited in the gel with a similar seed model and the <em>R<sub>2</sub></em>-dose calibration curve was plotted. Gel water equivalency was assessed by MC, comparing the percentage depth dose (PDD) delivered to water and gel phantoms when exposed to <sup>125</sup>I seeds. Gel thermal and temporal stability were assessed up to 70 °C and over 7 days, respectively. <em>Dose profile visualization:</em> A two-part box and a plaque with 3 holes (1 × 1.5 mm diam/depth) were 3D-printed (Apium P220 printer) in PEEK as the gel container and <sup>125</sup>I seed holder, respectively (Fig1e). The gel was prepared (SSE protocol) and exposed to the plaque for 54h (avg. activity: 1.58 mCi; n=3) followed by 3T <em>T<sub>2</sub></em>-w MRI scanning. The dose was visualized in 3D using the calibration curve and the Python code using Plotly Library.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that MAGIC-f gel is water equivalent (gel/water PDD ∼1), thermally (up to 70 °C
目的个性化三维打印近距离放射治疗(BT)植入物和先进的剂量绘制方法可更好地瞄准肿瘤几何形状,从而改善近距离放射治疗的效果1。这种方法面临的一个挑战是必须在植入前测量每个装置的剂量曲线。聚合物凝胶剂量计(PGD)可以应对个性化 BT 设备的剂量测定挑战。然而,PGD 主要用于体外射束治疗和高能光子;相比之下,对于低剂量率(LDR)BT,低能光子(LEP)会引起水当量、能量响应2a 和更长照射时间等问题。本研究优化了基于甲基丙烯酸(MAA,活性单体)的均质 PGD 配方,以应对这些挑战。针对 LDR-BT 设备制定了剂量测定评估方法,包括使用 MRI(3 个磁场:1、1.5、3T)测量凝胶对 LEP 的响应,以及在 PGD 中生成暴露于含有 125I 种子的 3D 打印斑块时的实验剂量曲线,并以 3D 形式绘制数值曲线。明胶和多聚甲醛溶于纯水,在 45°C 下混合。在 37°C 时加入五水硫酸铜、L-抗坏血酸和 MAA。溶液在 4°C 的玻璃容器中凝胶化过夜。将形成的凝胶置于固定玻璃管中的 125I 种子(OncoSeed 6711,活性:2.13 mCi;n=3)中,在 RT 下暴露 54 小时(图 1a)。使用 1T、1.5T 和 3T 核磁共振成像(TR/TE= 3585(1T)-4350(1.5T)-5410(3T)/22-352ms)对凝胶进行 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm3 体素扫描(T2-w)。T2(=1/ R2)图是在整个小瓶轴向平面生成的。使用 TOPAS Monte Carlo(MC)代码工具包计算类似种子模型沉积在凝胶中的绝对剂量,并绘制 R2 剂量校准曲线。通过 MC 评估凝胶水当量,比较暴露于 125I 种子时水和凝胶模型的深度剂量百分比 (PDD)。凝胶的热稳定性和时间稳定性分别在 70 °C 和 7 天内进行了评估。剂量曲线可视化:用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)材料 3D 打印了一个两部分组成的盒子和一个带 3 个孔(直径/深度为 1 × 1.5 毫米)的斑块,分别作为凝胶容器和 125I 种子支架(图 1e)。制备凝胶(SSE 方案)并在斑块上暴露 54 小时(平均活性:1.58 mCi;n=3),然后进行 3T T2-w MRI 扫描。结果表明,MAGIC-f 凝胶具有水当量(凝胶/水 PDD ∼1)、热稳定性(高达 70 °C)以及在 RT 条件下 7 天的时间稳定性。SEE 结果显示,1T、1.5T 和 3T MRI 扫描的检测范围分别为 10-20、7-25 和 8-22Gy,灵敏度分别为 0.6、0.35 和 0.44Gy-1s-1(图 1d);与文献2b 报道的唯一等效研究相比,LEP 灵敏度至少提高了 3 倍。虽然 1T 磁共振成像扫描的凝胶灵敏度最高,但 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振成像可检测到更低的剂量值和更宽的剂量范围。图 1i 显示了三维打印 LDR 斑块的三维剂量分布,验证了凝胶在三维高分辨率下可视化剂量曲线的功能。它能以高灵敏度和高分辨率检测 LEP 引起的微小剂量变化。[1]Lescot et al Adv Health Mater 12.25 2023 [2] Pantelis et al Phys Med Biol (a) 49.15 2004 & (b) 50.18 2005 [3] Fernandes et al JPCS 164.1 2009
{"title":"MSOR2 Presentation Time: 5:05 PM","authors":"Mahdokht Akbari Taemeh PhD Candidate ,&nbsp;Théophraste Lescot M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Marc-André Fortin Ing., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.036","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.036","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Personalized 3D-printed brachytherapy (BT) implants and advanced dose painting methods for better-targeting tumor geometry, could improve BT outcomes&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;. One challenge in this approach is the necessity of measuring the dose profile for each device, before implantation. Polymer gel dosimeters (PGD) could meet the dosimetry challenges of personalized BT devices. However, PGDs have been mainly used in external beam therapy applications and at high-energy photons; by comparison for low-dose-rate (LDR) BT, low-energy photons (LEP) raise issues of water equivalency, energy response&lt;sup&gt;2a&lt;/sup&gt; and longer exposure times. In this study, a homogeneous PGD formulation based on methacrylic acid (MAA, the reactive monomer) was optimized to meet these challenges. A dosimetry assessment methodology was elaborated for LDR-BT devices, involving the measurement of gel response to LEP using MRI (3 magnetic fields: 1, 1.5, 3T) and experimental dose profiles were generated in PGDs upon exposure to 3D-printed plaques containing &lt;sup&gt;125&lt;/sup&gt;I seeds and numerically plotted in 3D.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;Single Seed Experiment (SSE):&lt;/em&gt; a MAGIC-f gel formulation&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; was optimized by adding 0.75 %w/w paraformaldehyde (PF) as gelatin crosslinker. Gelatin and PF were dissolved in pure water and mixed at 45°C. CopperII sulfate pentahydrate, L-ascorbic acid and MAA were added at 37°C. The solution was gelified in a glass container at 4°C overnight. Formed gels were exposed to a &lt;sup&gt;125&lt;/sup&gt;I seed (OncoSeed 6711, activity: 2.13 mCi; n=3) placed in a fixed glass tube for 54h at RT (Fig1a). The gels were MRI-scanned (&lt;em&gt;T&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt;-w) with 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; voxel size using 1T, 1.5T and 3T MRI (TR/TE= 3585(1T)-4350(1.5T)-5410(3T)/22-352ms). &lt;em&gt;T&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (=1/ &lt;em&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt;) maps were generated across the vial axial plane. The TOPAS Monte Carlo (MC) code toolkit was used to calculate the absolute dose deposited in the gel with a similar seed model and the &lt;em&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt;-dose calibration curve was plotted. Gel water equivalency was assessed by MC, comparing the percentage depth dose (PDD) delivered to water and gel phantoms when exposed to &lt;sup&gt;125&lt;/sup&gt;I seeds. Gel thermal and temporal stability were assessed up to 70 °C and over 7 days, respectively. &lt;em&gt;Dose profile visualization:&lt;/em&gt; A two-part box and a plaque with 3 holes (1 × 1.5 mm diam/depth) were 3D-printed (Apium P220 printer) in PEEK as the gel container and &lt;sup&gt;125&lt;/sup&gt;I seed holder, respectively (Fig1e). The gel was prepared (SSE protocol) and exposed to the plaque for 54h (avg. activity: 1.58 mCi; n=3) followed by 3T &lt;em&gt;T&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt;-w MRI scanning. The dose was visualized in 3D using the calibration curve and the Python code using Plotly Library.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The results showed that MAGIC-f gel is water equivalent (gel/water PDD ∼1), thermally (up to 70 °C","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S35-S36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Saturday, July 13, 202410:30 AM - 11:30 AMPPP01 Presentation Time: 10:30 AM 2024 年 7 月 13 日(星期六)上午 10:30 - 11:30PP01 演讲时间:上午 10:30
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.093
Frédéric Lacroix Ph.D , Eric Poulin Ph.D. , Cédric Bélanger Ph.D. , Sylviane Aubin M.Sc. , Eric Vigneault MD , André-Guy Martin M.D. , François Bachand M.D. , Luc Beaulieu Ph.D. , William Foster M.D.
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>gMCO generated plans for HDR prostate brachytherapy have been shown to be superior to standard reference clinical plans in a blinded pairwise comparison[1]. The purpose of this work, a first-in-man trial, was to compare gMCO and reference plans in terms of planning time and plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy 15Gy boosts in a randomized clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>The brachytherapy procedure was as follows: 1) Patient walk-in/installation/anaesthesia 2) Positioning/Catheter implantation under transrectal ultrasound (US) guidance 3) 3D US scan 4) Contouring/catheter reconstruction on Oncentra Prostate (Elekta, Veenendaal, Netherlands) 5) Planning 6) Treatment. Planning (step 5) was performed, after randomization, using either IPSA (Oncentra Prostate, Veenendaal, Netherlands) or gMCO (in-house platform). For gMCO planning, the contours and reconstructed catheters were exported to gMCO at step 4) and the resulting plan was imported on OCP at step 6). The planning times on IPSA or gMCO were recorded. Patients previously had a planning MR in order to identify the gross tumor volume (GTV, PIRADS 3 and above)and, if present, received a boost of 125% of the prescription dose. At the time of writing, 55 (of 60) patients have been accrued and treated on this trial. Of those, only 10 patients had no GTV. Dosimetric parameters (Prostate V100, V150, V200, GTV D90, Urethra D10, Rectum and Bladder V75 and D1cc) of gMCO and IPSA plans were compared (Student's T test) to determine if plan quality and planning times were statistically different.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Figure 1 shows a) a boxplot of the the planning times (minutes), b) a boxplot of the GTV D90 coverage (Gy) and c) a histogram of the proportion of GTVs with more than 19, 19.5 and 20 Gy D90 coverage for gMCO and IPSA for the 55 accrued patients (29 gMCO and 26 IPSA). Figure 1 a) shows that the median planning time for clinical cases is roughly halved (p=0.0002) for gMCO (5.0 min) compared to IPSA (10.0 min) and b) shows a trend towards higher GTV D90s for gMCO planning compared to IPSA (p=0.26). The median GTV volume and standard deviation was 3.5 cc (4.2 cc std) for gMCO and 2.8 cc (2.3 cc std) for IPSA patients (p=0.21). Additionally, we found no learning curve effect in the planning using gMCO. No statistically significant differences were found between dosimetric parameters for the prostate V100, V150, D90, Bladder V75, Rectum V75 and Urethra D10. The prostate V200 was statistically higher for gMCO (p=0.048), possibly because of higher GTV D90 to the (19.8 Gy) compared to IPSA (19.3 Gy). Figure 1c) shows that a superior GTV D90 coverage can be obtained more consistently for gMCO as compared to IPSA at 19, 19.5 and 20 Gy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This work presents a first-in-man trial of GPU based multicriteria optimization in prostate HDR brachytherapy. The planning time was halved when using gM
目的 gMCO 生成的 HDR 前列腺近距离治疗计划在盲法配对比较中显示优于标准参考临床计划[1]。本研究是一项首次临床试验,目的是在随机临床试验中比较 gMCO 和参考计划在前列腺 HDR 近距离 15Gy 增量治疗中的计划时间和计划质量:1) 患者入院/安装/麻醉 2)在经直肠超声(US)引导下定位/植入导管 3) 3D US 扫描 4) 在 Oncentra Prostate(Elekta,Veenendaal,荷兰)上进行轮廓/导管重建 5) 计划 6) 治疗。规划(第 5 步)在随机分配后使用 IPSA(Oncentra Prostate,荷兰维嫩达尔)或 gMCO(内部平台)进行。对于 gMCO 规划,在步骤 4) 将轮廓和重建导管导出到 gMCO,在步骤 6) 将生成的规划导入 OCP。记录了 IPSA 或 gMCO 的规划时间。患者之前曾接受过一次 MR 计划,以确定肿瘤总体积(GTV,PIRADS 3 及以上),如果存在,则接受处方剂量 125% 的增量。在撰写本报告时,已有 55 名(共 60 名)患者接受了该试验的治疗。其中,只有 10 名患者没有 GTV。对 gMCO 和 IPSA 计划的剂量参数(前列腺 V100、V150、V200、GTV D90、尿道 D10、直肠和膀胱 V75 和 D1cc)进行了比较(学生 T 检验),以确定计划质量和计划时间是否存在统计学差异。结果图 1 显示了 a) 规划时间(分钟)的方框图;b) GTV D90 覆盖率(Gy)的方框图;c) gMCO 和 IPSA 的 GTV D90 覆盖率超过 19、19.5 和 20 Gy 的比例直方图,共 55 例患者(29 例 gMCO 和 26 例 IPSA)。图 1 a) 显示,与 IPSA(10.0 分钟)相比,gMCO(5.0 分钟)的临床病例中位规划时间大约缩短了一半(p=0.0002);b) 显示,与 IPSA 相比,gMCO 规划的 GTV D90 呈上升趋势(p=0.26)。gMCO 患者的中位 GTV 体积和标准偏差为 3.5 毫升(标准偏差为 4.2 毫升),IPSA 患者的中位 GTV 体积和标准偏差为 2.8 毫升(标准偏差为 2.3 毫升)(P=0.21)。此外,我们在使用 gMCO 进行规划时没有发现学习曲线效应。前列腺 V100、V150、D90、膀胱 V75、直肠 V75 和尿道 D10 的剂量学参数之间没有统计学意义上的差异。前列腺 V200 在统计学上高于 gMCO(p=0.048),这可能是因为 GTV D90(19.8 Gy)高于 IPSA(19.3 Gy)。图 1c) 显示,在 19、19.5 和 20 Gy 时,与 IPSA 相比,gMCO 可以更稳定地获得更高的 GTV D90 覆盖率。与 IPSA 相比,使用 gMCO 的规划时间缩短了一半。在不影响 OARs 的情况下,GTV D90s 得到了改善。gMCO 计划没有学习曲线效应。[1] C. Bélanger 等人,"基于 GPU 的多标准优化算法与 HDR 近距离放射治疗计划导航工具相结合的观察者间评估",近距离放射治疗 21 (2022),551-560。
{"title":"Saturday, July 13, 202410:30 AM - 11:30 AMPPP01 Presentation Time: 10:30 AM","authors":"Frédéric Lacroix Ph.D ,&nbsp;Eric Poulin Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Cédric Bélanger Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Sylviane Aubin M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Eric Vigneault MD ,&nbsp;André-Guy Martin M.D. ,&nbsp;François Bachand M.D. ,&nbsp;Luc Beaulieu Ph.D. ,&nbsp;William Foster M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.093","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.093","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;gMCO generated plans for HDR prostate brachytherapy have been shown to be superior to standard reference clinical plans in a blinded pairwise comparison[1]. The purpose of this work, a first-in-man trial, was to compare gMCO and reference plans in terms of planning time and plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy 15Gy boosts in a randomized clinical trial.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The brachytherapy procedure was as follows: 1) Patient walk-in/installation/anaesthesia 2) Positioning/Catheter implantation under transrectal ultrasound (US) guidance 3) 3D US scan 4) Contouring/catheter reconstruction on Oncentra Prostate (Elekta, Veenendaal, Netherlands) 5) Planning 6) Treatment. Planning (step 5) was performed, after randomization, using either IPSA (Oncentra Prostate, Veenendaal, Netherlands) or gMCO (in-house platform). For gMCO planning, the contours and reconstructed catheters were exported to gMCO at step 4) and the resulting plan was imported on OCP at step 6). The planning times on IPSA or gMCO were recorded. Patients previously had a planning MR in order to identify the gross tumor volume (GTV, PIRADS 3 and above)and, if present, received a boost of 125% of the prescription dose. At the time of writing, 55 (of 60) patients have been accrued and treated on this trial. Of those, only 10 patients had no GTV. Dosimetric parameters (Prostate V100, V150, V200, GTV D90, Urethra D10, Rectum and Bladder V75 and D1cc) of gMCO and IPSA plans were compared (Student's T test) to determine if plan quality and planning times were statistically different.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Figure 1 shows a) a boxplot of the the planning times (minutes), b) a boxplot of the GTV D90 coverage (Gy) and c) a histogram of the proportion of GTVs with more than 19, 19.5 and 20 Gy D90 coverage for gMCO and IPSA for the 55 accrued patients (29 gMCO and 26 IPSA). Figure 1 a) shows that the median planning time for clinical cases is roughly halved (p=0.0002) for gMCO (5.0 min) compared to IPSA (10.0 min) and b) shows a trend towards higher GTV D90s for gMCO planning compared to IPSA (p=0.26). The median GTV volume and standard deviation was 3.5 cc (4.2 cc std) for gMCO and 2.8 cc (2.3 cc std) for IPSA patients (p=0.21). Additionally, we found no learning curve effect in the planning using gMCO. No statistically significant differences were found between dosimetric parameters for the prostate V100, V150, D90, Bladder V75, Rectum V75 and Urethra D10. The prostate V200 was statistically higher for gMCO (p=0.048), possibly because of higher GTV D90 to the (19.8 Gy) compared to IPSA (19.3 Gy). Figure 1c) shows that a superior GTV D90 coverage can be obtained more consistently for gMCO as compared to IPSA at 19, 19.5 and 20 Gy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This work presents a first-in-man trial of GPU based multicriteria optimization in prostate HDR brachytherapy. The planning time was halved when using gM","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S68-S69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PHSOR08 Presentation Time: 9:35 AM PHSOR08 演讲时间:上午 9:35
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.082
Margaret Barker MS, Michael Campbell MS, Lisa Turner MS, Nisar Syed MD, Randy Wei MD, PhD, Peyman Kabolizadeh MD, PhD
<div><h3>Purpose/Objectives</h3><div>Interstitial HDR brachytherapy to the prostate involves precise, localized delivery to targets with high dose gradients, sparing adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Due to the proximity of the rectum and bladder to the target, deviations in the template position or catheter with respect to patient anatomy can change dose to those structures. While utilizing plastic interstitial catheters allows the patient to receive hyperthermia therapy during their course of interstitial treatment, the plastic catheters were observed to show significant deflection when the metal stylets are removed for treatment. The flexion of the source path for this particular afterloader has been previously demonstrated to show significant deviation within rigid intracavitary devices. The purpose of this study is to assess the magnitude and deflection of the plastic catheters for prostate interstitial plans and determine whether using flexible wires of similar thickness to the source cable for visualization on pre-treatment imaging is suitable for reconstructing the actual treatment received.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Pre-treatment CT images where the stylets were utilized for catheter visualization were registered to a subsequent CT scan with the metal stylets removed. The original treatment dwell positions and times were adjusted to the second CT to evaluate three-dimensional catheter displacement and dose distributions calculated for the bladder, rectum, urethra, and target. The plans were subsequently reconstructed on a pre-planning CT with flexible 20-gauge wires instead of metal stylets in order to determine their suitability as a surrogate for stylets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Absolute 3D displacement for all patients was 4.9 mm ± 3.0 mm (n = 1645 catheter dwell positions for all treatment plans and patients, mean ± SD, p<0.001) comparing plans with the stylet in versus out. Absolute catheter deflection magnitude for interstitial treatments increased with the removal of the metal stylets with a difference of 1.07° ± 0.83° (n = 153 catheters for all treatment plans and patients, mean ± SD, p<0.01). The plans utilizing flexible wire instead of stylets are observed to correlate with the plans with no stylets with absolute 3D displacement and angular deflection of 1.7 ± 1.1 mm and 0.36° ± 0.3° respectively (n = 67 catheters, mean ± SD, p>0.2). There was an overall increase in bladder D2cc (p<0.01) with the stylets utilized vs removed. Bladder D2cc, rectal D2cc, and urethra D0.1cc showed no appreciable difference between utilizing flexible wires for visualization and the plans without (p>0.10). There is no appreciable difference in target coverage comparing the plan types (p>0.5).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Catheter reconstruction in interstitial prostate treatments with CT imaging revealed significant changes in catheter positioning with respect to the OAR volumes once the st
目的/目标前列腺间质高分辨近距离放射治疗(HDR Brachytherapy)是通过高剂量梯度对靶点进行精确的局部放射治疗,同时保留邻近的高危器官(OAR)。由于直肠和膀胱靠近目标,模板位置或导管与患者解剖结构的偏差会改变这些结构的剂量。虽然使用塑料间质导管可以让患者在间质治疗过程中接受热疗,但据观察,当移除金属导管进行治疗时,塑料导管会出现明显偏移。这种特殊后加载器的放射源路径的弯曲以前曾被证实在刚性腔内装置中显示出明显的偏差。本研究的目的是评估前列腺间质计划中塑料导管的幅度和偏转,并确定在治疗前成像中使用与源电缆粗细相似的柔性导线进行可视化是否适合重建实际接受的治疗。根据第二次 CT 扫描调整原始治疗停留位置和时间,以评估膀胱、直肠、尿道和目标的三维导管位移和剂量分布。结果所有患者的绝对三维位移为 4.9 mm ± 3.0 mm(所有治疗方案和患者的导管停留位置为 1645 个,平均值 ± SD,p<0.001)。间质治疗的导管绝对偏转幅度随着金属支架的移除而增加,差异为 1.07° ± 0.83°(所有治疗方案和患者的导管数量为 153 个,平均 ± SD,p<0.01)。使用柔性导丝代替支架的方案与不使用支架的方案相比,三维位移和角度偏转的绝对值分别为 1.7 ± 1.1 mm 和 0.36° ± 0.3°(n = 67 个导管,平均值 ± SD,p>0.2)。使用与移除支架后,膀胱 D2cc 整体增加(p<0.01)。膀胱 D2cc、直肠 D2cc 和尿道 D0.1cc 在使用软导线进行可视化与不使用软导线进行可视化之间没有明显差异(p>0.10)。结论通过 CT 成像对前列腺间质治疗中的导管重建显示,一旦移除治疗用的支架,导管定位与 OAR 容积之间就会发生显著变化。虽然导管之间的几何形状保持不变,但它们会随着前列腺整体移动。使用与放射源电缆粗细相似的柔性导线可以在计划过程中进行更精确的跟踪,而不会扭曲患者的解剖结构,从而保持治疗计划的完整性。
{"title":"PHSOR08 Presentation Time: 9:35 AM","authors":"Margaret Barker MS,&nbsp;Michael Campbell MS,&nbsp;Lisa Turner MS,&nbsp;Nisar Syed MD,&nbsp;Randy Wei MD, PhD,&nbsp;Peyman Kabolizadeh MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.082","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.082","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Interstitial HDR brachytherapy to the prostate involves precise, localized delivery to targets with high dose gradients, sparing adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Due to the proximity of the rectum and bladder to the target, deviations in the template position or catheter with respect to patient anatomy can change dose to those structures. While utilizing plastic interstitial catheters allows the patient to receive hyperthermia therapy during their course of interstitial treatment, the plastic catheters were observed to show significant deflection when the metal stylets are removed for treatment. The flexion of the source path for this particular afterloader has been previously demonstrated to show significant deviation within rigid intracavitary devices. The purpose of this study is to assess the magnitude and deflection of the plastic catheters for prostate interstitial plans and determine whether using flexible wires of similar thickness to the source cable for visualization on pre-treatment imaging is suitable for reconstructing the actual treatment received.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Pre-treatment CT images where the stylets were utilized for catheter visualization were registered to a subsequent CT scan with the metal stylets removed. The original treatment dwell positions and times were adjusted to the second CT to evaluate three-dimensional catheter displacement and dose distributions calculated for the bladder, rectum, urethra, and target. The plans were subsequently reconstructed on a pre-planning CT with flexible 20-gauge wires instead of metal stylets in order to determine their suitability as a surrogate for stylets.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Absolute 3D displacement for all patients was 4.9 mm ± 3.0 mm (n = 1645 catheter dwell positions for all treatment plans and patients, mean ± SD, p&lt;0.001) comparing plans with the stylet in versus out. Absolute catheter deflection magnitude for interstitial treatments increased with the removal of the metal stylets with a difference of 1.07° ± 0.83° (n = 153 catheters for all treatment plans and patients, mean ± SD, p&lt;0.01). The plans utilizing flexible wire instead of stylets are observed to correlate with the plans with no stylets with absolute 3D displacement and angular deflection of 1.7 ± 1.1 mm and 0.36° ± 0.3° respectively (n = 67 catheters, mean ± SD, p&gt;0.2). There was an overall increase in bladder D2cc (p&lt;0.01) with the stylets utilized vs removed. Bladder D2cc, rectal D2cc, and urethra D0.1cc showed no appreciable difference between utilizing flexible wires for visualization and the plans without (p&gt;0.10). There is no appreciable difference in target coverage comparing the plan types (p&gt;0.5).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Catheter reconstruction in interstitial prostate treatments with CT imaging revealed significant changes in catheter positioning with respect to the OAR volumes once the st","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S61-S62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PHSOR04 Presentation Time: 9:15 AM PHSOR04 演讲时间:上午 9:15
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.078
Ioannis Androulakis PhD , Myra van Laar BSc , Jérémy Godart PhD , Robin Straathof MSc , Henrike Westerveld PhD, MD , Remi Nout PhD, MD , Mischa Hoogeman PhD , Inger-Karine K. Kolkman-Deurloo PhD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Afterloader integrated electromagnetic tracking (EMT) in pelvic high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has shown sub-millimeter accuracy in detecting dwell positions in interstitial implants. However, larger residual errors were found when including dwell positions from gynaecological applicators [van Heerden <em>et. al</em> (2021)]. The purpose of this study is to analyze EMT measurements in the Venezia™ intracavitary gynaecological applicator (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and assess their agreement with manufacturer-specified dwell positions in the treatment planning software (TPS).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Measurements with the afterloader integrated EMT system (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) were performed on 8 applicators. We included two different applicator configurations: a small configuration consisting of 22 mm/60° ovoids (OVs) with a 40 mm/30° intrauterine tandem (IU), and a large configuration consisting of 26 mm/60° OVs with a 70 mm/30° IU. For each of the two configurations, 4 applicators were included: 2 old applicators being phased out of clinical use, and 2 new applicators before clinical introduction. Dwell positions with an interval of 5 mm were measured along the full length of each of the three applicator channels. Measurements in each applicator were repeated 5 times to determine maximum measurement deviation, including repositioning of the applicator and reconnecting to the transfer tubes. The measurements from the four distinct applicators within each configuration were compared to evaluate maximum inter-applicator deviation. Applicator configuration measurements were compared with manufacturer-specified dwell positions, as defined in the Oncentra-Brachy TPS (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Manufacturer-specified dwell positions consist of centerline data for the IU and measured source position data for the OVs. In all comparisons, Euclidean distances (ED) between corresponding dwell positions after registration (Procrustes analysis) were used to determine deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Maximum intra-applicator measurement deviation was below 0.8 mm for all applicators. A maximum inter-applicator deviation of 1.3 mm was observed, invariant across configurations and irrespective of applicator age. Comparing the measured dwell positions to the manufacturer-specified dwell positions, EDs of up to 3.8 mm and 4.2 mm were found for the small and large configuration, respectively. The largest deviation between EMT measurements and manufacturer-specified dwell positions were found at the IU tip for both applicator configurations, see Fig. 1. For the straight part and curved part of the IU, maximum deviations were considerably lower at 2.1 mm and 1.9 mm, for the small and large applicator configuration respectively. In the OVs the maximum deviations were 2.5 mm and 2.4 mm, for the small and large applicator configuration respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion
目的 盆腔高剂量率近距离放射治疗(HDR-BT)中的后装载器集成电磁跟踪(EMT)在检测间质植入物的停留位置方面显示出亚毫米级的精确度。然而,当包括来自妇科应用器的停留位置时,发现了更大的残余误差[van Heerden 等人(2021 年)]。本研究旨在分析 Venezia™ 腔内妇科应用器(瑞典斯德哥尔摩 Elekta AB)的 EMT 测量结果,并评估其与治疗计划软件 (TPS) 中制造商指定的停留位置的一致性。我们采用了两种不同的涂抹器配置:一种小型配置由 22 mm/60° 椭圆形 (OV) 和 40 mm/30° 宫内串联 (IU) 组成,另一种大型配置由 26 mm/60° 椭圆形和 70 mm/30° IU 组成。两种配置各包括 4 个涂抹器:其中 2 个是已退出临床使用的旧涂抹器,2 个是尚未投入临床使用的新涂抹器。沿三个涂抹器通道的全长测量了间隔为 5 毫米的停留位置。每个涂抹器重复测量 5 次,以确定最大测量偏差,包括重新定位涂抹器和重新连接传输管。对每种配置中四个不同涂抹器的测量结果进行比较,以评估涂抹器之间的最大偏差。根据 Oncentra-Brachy TPS(瑞典斯德哥尔摩 Elekta AB 公司)的定义,将涂抹器配置测量结果与制造商指定的停留位置进行比较。制造商指定的停留位置包括 IU 的中心线数据和 OV 的测量源位置数据。在所有比较中,均使用注册后相应停留位置之间的欧氏距离(ED)来确定偏差(Procrustes 分析)。观察到涂抹器之间的最大偏差为 1.3 毫米,在不同配置下保持不变,且与涂抹器的使用年限无关。将测量的停留位置与制造商指定的停留位置进行比较,发现小配置和大配置的 ED 分别高达 3.8 毫米和 4.2 毫米。在两种涂抹器配置中,EMT 测量值与制造商指定停留位置之间的最大偏差出现在 IU 端,见图 1。对于 IU 的直线部分和弯曲部分,小型和大型涂抹器配置的最大偏差要小得多,分别为 2.1 毫米和 1.9 毫米。结论EMT测量的涂抹器内部测量偏差与其他研究[Durrbeck et al (2024)]发现的偏差相似。当观察涂抹器之间的偏差时,发现偏差略有增加,这表明不同涂抹器之间的几何偏差较小,与涂抹器的使用年限或配置无关。将 EMT 测量的停留位置与制造商指定的停留位置进行比较时,发现偏差大于测量不确定性。特别是在 IU 喷头,EMT 测量结果与制造商规定的停留位置不一致(图 1.b)。因此,我们建议在 IU 中引入实验定义的停留位置。
{"title":"PHSOR04 Presentation Time: 9:15 AM","authors":"Ioannis Androulakis PhD ,&nbsp;Myra van Laar BSc ,&nbsp;Jérémy Godart PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Straathof MSc ,&nbsp;Henrike Westerveld PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Remi Nout PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Mischa Hoogeman PhD ,&nbsp;Inger-Karine K. Kolkman-Deurloo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.078","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.078","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Afterloader integrated electromagnetic tracking (EMT) in pelvic high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has shown sub-millimeter accuracy in detecting dwell positions in interstitial implants. However, larger residual errors were found when including dwell positions from gynaecological applicators [van Heerden &lt;em&gt;et. al&lt;/em&gt; (2021)]. The purpose of this study is to analyze EMT measurements in the Venezia™ intracavitary gynaecological applicator (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and assess their agreement with manufacturer-specified dwell positions in the treatment planning software (TPS).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Measurements with the afterloader integrated EMT system (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) were performed on 8 applicators. We included two different applicator configurations: a small configuration consisting of 22 mm/60° ovoids (OVs) with a 40 mm/30° intrauterine tandem (IU), and a large configuration consisting of 26 mm/60° OVs with a 70 mm/30° IU. For each of the two configurations, 4 applicators were included: 2 old applicators being phased out of clinical use, and 2 new applicators before clinical introduction. Dwell positions with an interval of 5 mm were measured along the full length of each of the three applicator channels. Measurements in each applicator were repeated 5 times to determine maximum measurement deviation, including repositioning of the applicator and reconnecting to the transfer tubes. The measurements from the four distinct applicators within each configuration were compared to evaluate maximum inter-applicator deviation. Applicator configuration measurements were compared with manufacturer-specified dwell positions, as defined in the Oncentra-Brachy TPS (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Manufacturer-specified dwell positions consist of centerline data for the IU and measured source position data for the OVs. In all comparisons, Euclidean distances (ED) between corresponding dwell positions after registration (Procrustes analysis) were used to determine deviation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Maximum intra-applicator measurement deviation was below 0.8 mm for all applicators. A maximum inter-applicator deviation of 1.3 mm was observed, invariant across configurations and irrespective of applicator age. Comparing the measured dwell positions to the manufacturer-specified dwell positions, EDs of up to 3.8 mm and 4.2 mm were found for the small and large configuration, respectively. The largest deviation between EMT measurements and manufacturer-specified dwell positions were found at the IU tip for both applicator configurations, see Fig. 1. For the straight part and curved part of the IU, maximum deviations were considerably lower at 2.1 mm and 1.9 mm, for the small and large applicator configuration respectively. In the OVs the maximum deviations were 2.5 mm and 2.4 mm, for the small and large applicator configuration respectively.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
GSOR04 Presentation Time: 5:15 PM GSOR04 演讲时间:下午 5:15
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.050
Memory Fadziso Bvochora-Nsingo Masters in Medicine, Dawn Balang MD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Cervical cancer remains the most prevalent cancer treated in Botswana. With only a single institution offering curative chemoradiation during the pandemic, brachytherapy cases serve as a proxy for all curative interventions.The study examines the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Botswana, emphasizing the challenges posed by lockdowns and restrictions on both local and international travel. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of brachytherapy could mirror disruptions faced by other cancer treatments due to regional lockdowns and centralized treatment modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A longitudinal analysis of brachytherapy cases from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, with a particular focus on the trend changes coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collated from hospital records, maintenance logs for medical equipment, national cancer registries, and pandemic response documentation. The analysis explored the correlation between pandemic-related restrictions and the accessibility of brachytherapy services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 2499 brachytherapy insertions done in the six years between 2018 and 2023 only 110 insertions (4.5%) were done in 2020 and 238 (9.5%) in 2021, the peak COVID years. Fig 1 illustrates the pandemic's impact on brachytherapy services in Botswana.The one-way ANOVA conducted to compare the mean number of brachytherapy insertions before(2018 to 2019), during (2020 to 2021), and after (2022 to 2023) the pandemic yields an F-statistic of approximately 33.837 and a p-value of approximately 0.0087, suggesting that there is a statistically significant difference in the number of brachytherapy insertions among at least two of the three periods compared. The analysis highlights a severe reduction in brachytherapy treatments in 2020 and 2021. This period coincides with a gorvenrment lockdown beginning in April 2020, with subsequent regional lockdowns and quarantine of both healthcare workers and patients. There was a three-month breakdown of the single linear accelerator at the nation's primary cancer treatment center, attributable to the absence of engineers from South Africa who were unable to travel due to lockdowns. Additionally, the expiry of the Ir192 source, essential for brachytherapy and challenging to replace due to its short half-life of 174 days, led to a six-month cessation of services. This was compounded by regulatory complexities and the dependence on international engineers for both source replacement and equipment servicing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted brachytherapy services for cervical cancer, reflective of broader oncological treatment challenges during this period. It exposed vulnerabilities in Botswana's cancer treatment infrastructure, particularly the risk associated with using a short-lived isotop
目的 在博茨瓦纳,宫颈癌仍然是发病率最高的癌症。本研究探讨了 COVID-19 大流行对博茨瓦纳宫颈癌近距离放射治疗的影响,强调了封锁和限制本地及国际旅行所带来的挑战。COVID-19大流行对近距离治疗连续性的影响可能与其他癌症治疗因地区封锁和集中治疗模式而面临的中断情况如出一辙。材料与方法对2018年至2023年的近距离治疗病例进行了纵向分析,尤其关注与COVID-19大流行同时发生的趋势变化。数据来自医院记录、医疗设备维护日志、国家癌症登记处和大流行应对文件。分析探讨了大流行相关限制与近距离放射治疗服务可及性之间的相关性。结果 在 2018 年至 2023 年的六年间完成的 2499 例近距离放射治疗插入手术中,只有 110 例(4.5%)是在 2020 年完成的,238 例(9.5%)是在 2021 年完成的,即 COVID 高峰年。图 1 说明了大流行对博茨瓦纳近距离治疗服务的影响。为比较大流行前(2018 年至 2019 年)、大流行期间(2020 年至 2021 年)和大流行后(2022 年至 2023 年)近距离治疗插入的平均次数而进行的单因素方差分析得出的 F 统计量约为 33.837,P 值约为 0.0087,表明在三个比较时段中,至少有两个时段的近距离放射治疗插入数量存在显著的统计学差异。分析结果表明,2020 年和 2021 年近距离放射治疗次数将大幅减少。这一时期恰逢 2020 年 4 月开始的政府封锁,以及随后的地区封锁和对医护人员和患者的隔离。国家主要癌症治疗中心的单台直线加速器出现了长达三个月的故障,原因是来自南非的工程师因封锁而无法前往。此外,近距离放射治疗所必需的 Ir192 放射源因半衰期短(174 天)而难以更换,其过期导致服务中断 6 个月。复杂的监管问题以及在放射源更换和设备维修方面对国际工程师的依赖使问题变得更加复杂。 结论 COVID-19 大流行严重扰乱了宫颈癌近距离治疗服务,反映了这一时期更广泛的肿瘤治疗挑战。它暴露了博茨瓦纳癌症治疗基础设施的薄弱环节,尤其是在一个依赖国际支持的国家使用 Ir192 这种短效同位素所带来的风险。这种情况主张考虑使用钴 60 等半衰期较长的同位素,因为在类似情况下,钴 60 可以为医疗系统提供更强的复原力。不过,2021 年后的恢复轨迹凸显了医疗系统的适应能力,以及在全球危机期间维持癌症治疗服务的极端重要性。未来的战略应侧重于有弹性的医疗保健结构,以抵御类似的干扰,确保不间断的癌症治疗。
{"title":"GSOR04 Presentation Time: 5:15 PM","authors":"Memory Fadziso Bvochora-Nsingo Masters in Medicine,&nbsp;Dawn Balang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.050","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.050","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Cervical cancer remains the most prevalent cancer treated in Botswana. With only a single institution offering curative chemoradiation during the pandemic, brachytherapy cases serve as a proxy for all curative interventions.The study examines the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Botswana, emphasizing the challenges posed by lockdowns and restrictions on both local and international travel. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of brachytherapy could mirror disruptions faced by other cancer treatments due to regional lockdowns and centralized treatment modalities.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A longitudinal analysis of brachytherapy cases from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, with a particular focus on the trend changes coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collated from hospital records, maintenance logs for medical equipment, national cancer registries, and pandemic response documentation. The analysis explored the correlation between pandemic-related restrictions and the accessibility of brachytherapy services.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Of the 2499 brachytherapy insertions done in the six years between 2018 and 2023 only 110 insertions (4.5%) were done in 2020 and 238 (9.5%) in 2021, the peak COVID years. Fig 1 illustrates the pandemic's impact on brachytherapy services in Botswana.The one-way ANOVA conducted to compare the mean number of brachytherapy insertions before(2018 to 2019), during (2020 to 2021), and after (2022 to 2023) the pandemic yields an F-statistic of approximately 33.837 and a p-value of approximately 0.0087, suggesting that there is a statistically significant difference in the number of brachytherapy insertions among at least two of the three periods compared. The analysis highlights a severe reduction in brachytherapy treatments in 2020 and 2021. This period coincides with a gorvenrment lockdown beginning in April 2020, with subsequent regional lockdowns and quarantine of both healthcare workers and patients. There was a three-month breakdown of the single linear accelerator at the nation's primary cancer treatment center, attributable to the absence of engineers from South Africa who were unable to travel due to lockdowns. Additionally, the expiry of the Ir192 source, essential for brachytherapy and challenging to replace due to its short half-life of 174 days, led to a six-month cessation of services. This was compounded by regulatory complexities and the dependence on international engineers for both source replacement and equipment servicing.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted brachytherapy services for cervical cancer, reflective of broader oncological treatment challenges during this period. It exposed vulnerabilities in Botswana's cancer treatment infrastructure, particularly the risk associated with using a short-lived isotop","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Brachytherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1