首页 > 最新文献

Brachytherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Randomized trial comparing hypnosis versus standard management on patient anxiety and pain during pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal 随机试验比较催眠与标准管理在盆腔近距离治疗应用器移除过程中患者焦虑和疼痛。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010
Lydie Lemoine , Virginie Adam , Julia Salleron , Christelle Cuisinier , July Perrin , Claire Charra Brunaud , Py Jean-François , Marie Bruand , Didier Peiffert , Rémi Etienne , Cécile Huin Schohn , Sophie Renard

PURPOSE

Removal of brachytherapy applicator is routinely performed under premedication including Kalinox® gas inhalation without general anesthesia. The applicator removal is nevertheless associated with discomfort, anxiety or pain. We assessed the adjunction of formal hypnosis during this procedure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective, randomized, single-center study focused on adult patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. Patients were randomly assigned to (1:1): standard management including Kalinox® (control group) vs. standard management including Kalinox® accompanied by formal hypnosis (hypnosis group). The primary endpoint was anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y-A form (state anxiety). A secondary endpoint was pain after applicator removal (numerical scale).

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients (mean age, 51.9 years) were included (cervical cancer, 86.6%). Before applicator removal, mean (SD) STAI Y-A anxiety score was 45.9 (5.6) in the control group vs. 47.5 (5.9) in the hypnosis group. After applicator removal, the scores were 48.1 (4.3) versus 47.7 (4.2), respectively (p = 0.76). Pain score was not significantly different after applicator removal (p = 0.055) in the hypnosis group compared to the control group: 1.29 (1.72) versus 0.71 (1.51), respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning caregiver satisfaction with patient management (p = 0.27), ease of realization (p = 0.17) and caregiver comfort (p = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate a substantial benefit of formal hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. But this study suggests that the use of hypnotic communication techniques enables a positive attitude to patient care, thus reinforcing the patient-caregiver relationship.
目的:在没有全身麻醉的情况下,在用药前包括Kalinox®气体吸入的情况下,常规地去除近距离治疗涂敷器。尽管如此,拔除涂抹器仍伴有不适、焦虑或疼痛。我们在这个过程中评估了正式催眠的附加性。方法和材料:这项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究的重点是接受盆腔近距离治疗的成年患者。患者被随机分配到(1:1):标准管理包括Kalinox®(对照组)与标准管理包括Kalinox®伴正式催眠(催眠组)。主要终点是焦虑,使用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI) Y-A表格(状态焦虑)。次要终点是去除涂抹器后的疼痛(数值刻度)。结果:共纳入68例患者,平均年龄51.9岁,其中宫颈癌占86.6%。去除涂抹器前,对照组的平均(SD) STAI Y-A焦虑评分为45.9(5.6),催眠组为47.5(5.9)。去除涂抹器后,评分分别为48.1(4.3)和47.7 (4.2)(p = 0.76)。催眠组与对照组相比,去除涂药器后疼痛评分无显著差异(p = 0.055):分别为1.29(1.72)和0.71(1.51)。两组护理人员对患者管理的满意度(p = 0.27)、易实现性(p = 0.17)和护理人员舒适度(p = 0.42)差异均无统计学意义。结论:本研究未能证明正式催眠对盆腔近距离放射治疗的患者的焦虑有实质性的好处。但这项研究表明,催眠沟通技术的使用使病人护理的积极态度,从而加强了病人与护理者的关系。
{"title":"Randomized trial comparing hypnosis versus standard management on patient anxiety and pain during pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal","authors":"Lydie Lemoine ,&nbsp;Virginie Adam ,&nbsp;Julia Salleron ,&nbsp;Christelle Cuisinier ,&nbsp;July Perrin ,&nbsp;Claire Charra Brunaud ,&nbsp;Py Jean-François ,&nbsp;Marie Bruand ,&nbsp;Didier Peiffert ,&nbsp;Rémi Etienne ,&nbsp;Cécile Huin Schohn ,&nbsp;Sophie Renard","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>Removal of brachytherapy applicator is routinely performed under premedication including Kalinox® gas inhalation without general anesthesia. The applicator removal is nevertheless associated with discomfort, anxiety or pain. We assessed the adjunction of formal hypnosis during this procedure.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS AND MATERIALS</h3><div>This prospective, randomized, single-center study focused on adult patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. Patients were randomly assigned to (1:1): standard management including Kalinox® (control group) vs. standard management including Kalinox® accompanied by formal hypnosis (hypnosis group). The primary endpoint was anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y-A form (state anxiety). A secondary endpoint was pain after applicator removal (numerical scale).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>A total of 68 patients (mean age, 51.9 years) were included (cervical cancer, 86.6%). Before applicator removal, mean (SD) STAI Y-A anxiety score was 45.9 (5.6) in the control group vs. 47.5 (5.9) in the hypnosis group. After applicator removal, the scores were 48.1 (4.3) versus 47.7 (4.2), respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.76). Pain score was not significantly different after applicator removal (<em>p</em> = 0.055) in the hypnosis group compared to the control group: 1.29 (1.72) versus 0.71 (1.51), respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning caregiver satisfaction with patient management (<em>p</em> = 0.27), ease of realization (<em>p</em> = 0.17) and caregiver comfort (<em>p</em> = 0.42).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>This study failed to demonstrate a substantial benefit of formal hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. But this study suggests that the use of hypnotic communication techniques enables a positive attitude to patient care, thus reinforcing the patient-caregiver relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 854-862"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dosimetric characterization and experimental validation for a low-kV FPXS electronic brachytherapy system 低千伏FPXS电子近距离治疗系统的剂量学特性和实验验证。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.008
Mengke Qi , Sifu Luo , Jing Kang , Song Kang , Xingyu Lu , Ting He , Liang Cui , Jun Chen , Linghong Zhou , Yuan Xu

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using flat-panel X-ray source (FPXS) for brachytherapy through preclinical animal irradiation experiments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A low-kV FPXS electronic brachytherapy (EB) system was constructed for dosimetry measurements and experimental validation. The surface and depth dose characteristics of FPXS were measured employing a 34013 chamber. An FPXS-based EB workflow was established, enabling the calculation of required exposure times for FPXS at a given prescription dose. The accuracy of the delivered dose and the therapeutic efficacy of FPXS irradiation were validated through brachytherapy experiments conducted on murine models with breast cancer.

RESULTS

The FPXS operates with a maximum voltage of up to 50 kV and a maximum surface dose rate exceeding 2.30 Gy/min. The surface dose rate and current demonstrate an exponential increase with voltage, and the dose rate exhibits a linear correlation with the current. The calculated cumulative dose delivered to mice in the experimental group was slightly higher than the average in-field dose measured by film (21.88±0.61 Gy vs. 20.83 ± 1.03 Gy). Following FPXS irradiation, the increase in tumor volume of mice in the experimental group was markedly less pronounced than that observed in the control group, and the survival rate of mice in the experimental group over time was significantly higher than that of the control group (66.67% vs 12.50%).

CONCLUSION

The intensity of FPXS is comparable to current EB systems, and its surface dose rate is adequate for therapeutic applications. Animal irradiation experiments confirm the accuracy of FPXS-delivered doses and demonstrate its efficacy in tumor irradiation.
目的:本研究旨在通过临床前动物辐照实验,评价平板x射线源(FPXS)用于近距离放射治疗的可行性。材料与方法:构建低kv FPXS电子近距离放射治疗(EB)系统,进行剂量学测量和实验验证。采用34013腔室测量了FPXS的表面和深度剂量特性。建立了基于FPXS的EB工作流程,可以计算给定处方剂量下FPXS所需的暴露时间。通过对乳腺癌小鼠模型的近距离放疗实验,验证了FPXS照射剂量的准确性和治疗效果。结果:FPXS的最大工作电压可达50 kV,最大表面剂量率超过2.30 Gy/min。表面剂量率和电流随电压呈指数增长,剂量率与电流呈线性相关。实验组小鼠的计算累积剂量略高于膜法测得的平均场内剂量(21.88±0.61 Gy vs. 20.83 ± 1.03 Gy)。FPXS照射后,实验组小鼠肿瘤体积的增加明显小于对照组,且实验组小鼠随时间的存活率明显高于对照组(66.67% vs 12.50%)。结论:FPXS的强度与现有的EB系统相当,其表面剂量率足以用于治疗。动物辐照实验证实了fpxs给药剂量的准确性,证明了其在肿瘤辐照中的有效性。
{"title":"Dosimetric characterization and experimental validation for a low-kV FPXS electronic brachytherapy system","authors":"Mengke Qi ,&nbsp;Sifu Luo ,&nbsp;Jing Kang ,&nbsp;Song Kang ,&nbsp;Xingyu Lu ,&nbsp;Ting He ,&nbsp;Liang Cui ,&nbsp;Jun Chen ,&nbsp;Linghong Zhou ,&nbsp;Yuan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using flat-panel X-ray source (FPXS) for brachytherapy through preclinical animal irradiation experiments.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIAL AND METHODS</h3><div>A low-kV FPXS electronic brachytherapy (EB) system was constructed for dosimetry measurements and experimental validation. The surface and depth dose characteristics of FPXS were measured employing a 34013 chamber. An FPXS-based EB workflow was established, enabling the calculation of required exposure times for FPXS at a given prescription dose. The accuracy of the delivered dose and the therapeutic efficacy of FPXS irradiation were validated through brachytherapy experiments conducted on murine models with breast cancer.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The FPXS operates with a maximum voltage of up to 50 kV and a maximum surface dose rate exceeding 2.30 Gy/min. The surface dose rate and current demonstrate an exponential increase with voltage, and the dose rate exhibits a linear correlation with the current. The calculated cumulative dose delivered to mice in the experimental group was slightly higher than the average in-field dose measured by film (21.88±0.61 Gy vs. 20.83 ± 1.03 Gy). Following FPXS irradiation, the increase in tumor volume of mice in the experimental group was markedly less pronounced than that observed in the control group, and the survival rate of mice in the experimental group over time was significantly higher than that of the control group (66.67% vs 12.50%).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>The intensity of FPXS is comparable to current EB systems, and its surface dose rate is adequate for therapeutic applications. Animal irradiation experiments confirm the accuracy of FPXS-delivered doses and demonstrate its efficacy in tumor irradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 900-910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intraoperative low-dose rate brachytherapy as an adjunct to surgery for marginally resectable rectal and recurrent anorectal carcinomas 术中低剂量率近距离放射治疗作为外科手术的辅助治疗,用于边缘可切除的直肠癌和复发性肛肠癌。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.009
Mustafa M. Al Balushi , Teresia M. Perkins , Kee-Young Shin , Ivan M. Buzurovic , Simon G. Talbot , Joel E. Goldberg , Desmond A. O’Farrell , Martin T. King , Harvey J. Mamon , Philip M. Devlin

BACKGROUND

Locally recurrent and marginally resectable rectal and anorectal carcinomas present significant therapeutic challenges due to high recurrence rates and limited treatment options. Intraoperative low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) has emerged as a potential adjunct to improve local control in these cases. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with intraoperative LDRBT for these difficult cases.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that was approved by the institutional review board. Patients who had undergone intraoperative pelvic LDRBT for locally recurrent and marginally resectable rectal and anorectal carcinomas between February 2004 and April 2022 were included. Morbidity and survival were assessed using toxicity CTCAE V5.0 and Kaplan-Meyer curves, respectively.

RESULTS

29 patients were found to have been treated with surgical resection and intraoperative pelvic seed brachytherapy with either I-125 or Cs-131. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 88.7% (95% CI, 69.0–96.2) and 70.6% (95% CI, 47.7–84.9), respectively. Furthermore, the 1-year and 2-year local progression free survival rates were 55.4% (95% CI, 34.9–71.8) and 41.7% (95% CI, 22.3–60.1), respectively. Median number of months for local progression free survival was 15.6% (95% CI, 7.4–34.4). The most common toxicity was Grade 1–2 neuralgia in 41.4% of patients, with no Grade 4 or higher observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that intraoperative LDRBT may play a broader role in managing these challenging conditions. Morbidity was moderate and primarily dependent on disease progression. Survival and progression rates were consistent with published reports, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this treatment approach.
背景:由于高复发率和有限的治疗选择,局部复发和局部可切除的直肠和肛肠癌在治疗上面临着巨大的挑战。术中低剂量率近距离放疗(LDRBT)已成为改善这些病例局部控制的潜在辅助手段。本研究旨在评估术中LDRBT治疗这些困难病例的临床结果。方法:这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。在2004年2月至2022年4月期间,因局部复发和部分可切除的直肠癌和肛肠癌接受术中盆腔LDRBT的患者被纳入研究。发病率和生存率分别采用毒性CTCAE V5.0和Kaplan-Meyer曲线进行评估。结果:29例患者行手术切除和术中I-125或Cs-131盆腔近距离放射治疗。1年和2年总生存率分别为88.7% (95% CI, 69.0-96.2)和70.6% (95% CI, 47.7-84.9)。此外,1年和2年的局部无进展生存率分别为55.4% (95% CI, 34.9-71.8)和41.7% (95% CI, 22.3-60.1)。局部无进展生存的中位月数为15.6% (95% CI, 7.4-34.4)。41.4%的患者最常见的毒性是1-2级神经痛,没有观察到4级或更高的毒性。结论:我们的研究结果表明术中LDRBT可能在治疗这些具有挑战性的疾病中发挥更广泛的作用。发病率为中等,主要依赖于疾病进展。生存率和进展率与已发表的报告一致,突出了这种治疗方法的治疗潜力。
{"title":"Intraoperative low-dose rate brachytherapy as an adjunct to surgery for marginally resectable rectal and recurrent anorectal carcinomas","authors":"Mustafa M. Al Balushi ,&nbsp;Teresia M. Perkins ,&nbsp;Kee-Young Shin ,&nbsp;Ivan M. Buzurovic ,&nbsp;Simon G. Talbot ,&nbsp;Joel E. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Desmond A. O’Farrell ,&nbsp;Martin T. King ,&nbsp;Harvey J. Mamon ,&nbsp;Philip M. Devlin","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Locally recurrent and marginally resectable rectal and anorectal carcinomas present significant therapeutic challenges due to high recurrence rates and limited treatment options. Intraoperative low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) has emerged as a potential adjunct to improve local control in these cases. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with intraoperative LDRBT for these difficult cases.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This was a retrospective study that was approved by the institutional review board. Patients who had undergone intraoperative pelvic LDRBT for locally recurrent and marginally resectable rectal and anorectal carcinomas between February 2004 and April 2022 were included. Morbidity and survival were assessed using toxicity CTCAE V5.0 and Kaplan-Meyer curves, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>29 patients were found to have been treated with surgical resection and intraoperative pelvic seed brachytherapy with either I-125 or Cs-131. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 88.7% (95% CI, 69.0–96.2) and 70.6% (95% CI, 47.7–84.9), respectively. Furthermore, the 1-year and 2-year local progression free survival rates were 55.4% (95% CI, 34.9–71.8) and 41.7% (95% CI, 22.3–60.1), respectively. Median number of months for local progression free survival was 15.6% (95% CI, 7.4–34.4). The most common toxicity was Grade 1–2 neuralgia in 41.4% of patients, with no Grade 4 or higher observed.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Our results suggest that intraoperative LDRBT may play a broader role in managing these challenging conditions. Morbidity was moderate and primarily dependent on disease progression. Survival and progression rates were consistent with published reports, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this treatment approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 931-939"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of variability in applicator position and organs at risk dose in fractionated intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer 子宫颈癌分次腔内近距离放射治疗中施药器位置和危险器官剂量变化的评价。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.012
Francis Kazoba , Elingarami Sauli , Elias Nyanza , Aloyce I. Amasi

Background

Cervical cancer remains a major cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is critical for curative radiotherapy; however, inter-fractional variability in applicator positioning may compromise treatment reproducibility and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing.

Objective

This study assessed inter-fractional applicator positional stability and its dosimetric impact on OARs during fractionated ICBT for cervical cancer.

Materials and methods

A prospective analysis of 60 treatment plans from 20 patients receiving three ICBT fractions was conducted. Applicator shifts along the X, Y, and Z axes and corresponding bladder and rectal doses were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and repeated measures ANOVA determined positional reproducibility and dose variability, while correlation analysis examined associations between applicator displacement and OAR dose changes.

Results

Applicator positioning was reproducible across fractions, with no significant differences in any axis p > 0.05). Bladder dose, however, demonstrated significant variation (p = 0.027), progressively increasing across fractions. Moderate correlations (r ≈ 0.39) were observed between bladder dose escalation and applicator shifts along the X and Y axes, especially in the Y-axis. Rectal dose remained stable (p = 0.776).

Conclusion

Although applicator positioning was geometrically stable, significant bladder dose variability occurred. Adaptive replanning and real-time imaging are recommended to optimize treatment precision in fractionated ICBT.
背景:宫颈癌仍然是低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)死亡的主要原因。腔内近距离放疗(ICBT)是治疗性放疗的关键;然而,施药器位置的不同可能会影响治疗的可重复性和器官风险(OAR)保护。目的:本研究评估子宫颈癌分路ICBT手术中应用器位置稳定性及其剂量学对OARs的影响。材料与方法:对20例患者的60个治疗方案进行前瞻性分析。评估涂抹器沿X、Y和Z轴的位移以及相应的膀胱和直肠剂量。描述性统计和重复测量方差分析确定了位置重复性和剂量变异性,而相关分析检查了涂抹器位移与OAR剂量变化之间的关系。结果:涂抹器定位在不同部位均可重复,各轴无显著差异( > 0.05)。然而,膀胱剂量表现出显著的变化(p = 0.027),在不同组间逐渐增加。膀胱剂量递增与施药器沿X轴和Y轴(尤其是Y轴)移动之间存在中等相关性(r ≈ 0.39)。直肠剂量保持稳定(p = 0.776)。结论:尽管施药器的位置几何稳定,但膀胱剂量发生了明显的变化。建议采用自适应重新规划和实时成像来优化分块ICBT的治疗精度。
{"title":"Evaluation of variability in applicator position and organs at risk dose in fractionated intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer","authors":"Francis Kazoba ,&nbsp;Elingarami Sauli ,&nbsp;Elias Nyanza ,&nbsp;Aloyce I. Amasi","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cervical cancer remains a major cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is critical for curative radiotherapy; however, inter-fractional variability in applicator positioning may compromise treatment reproducibility and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study assessed inter-fractional applicator positional stability and its dosimetric impact on OARs during fractionated ICBT for cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A prospective analysis of 60 treatment plans from 20 patients receiving three ICBT fractions was conducted. Applicator shifts along the X, Y, and Z axes and corresponding bladder and rectal doses were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and repeated measures ANOVA determined positional reproducibility and dose variability, while correlation analysis examined associations between applicator displacement and OAR dose changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Applicator positioning was reproducible across fractions, with no significant differences in any axis <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Bladder dose, however, demonstrated significant variation (<em>p</em> = 0.027), progressively increasing across fractions. Moderate correlations (<em>r</em> ≈ 0.39) were observed between bladder dose escalation and applicator shifts along the X and Y axes, especially in the Y-axis. Rectal dose remained stable (<em>p</em> = 0.776).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although applicator positioning was geometrically stable, significant bladder dose variability occurred. Adaptive replanning and real-time imaging are recommended to optimize treatment precision in fractionated ICBT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 872-882"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A machine learning-based decision support tool for standardizing intracavitary versus interstitial brachytherapy technique selection in high-dose-rate cervical cancer 一种基于机器学习的决策支持工具,用于标准化高剂量率宫颈癌腔内与间质近距离治疗技术选择。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.011
Tomohiro Kajikawa , Koji Masui , Koji Sakai , Tadashi Takenaka , Gen Suzuki , Yuki Yoshino , Hikaru Nemoto , Hideya Yamazaki , Kei Yamada

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate a machine-learning (ML) decision-support tool that standardizes selection of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) versus hybrid intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) in high-dose-rate (HDR) cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 159 HDR brachytherapy plans from 50 consecutive patients treated between April 2022 and June 2024. Brachytherapy techniques (ICBT or IC/ISBT) were determined by an experienced radiation oncologist using CT/MRI-based 3-D image-guided brachytherapy. For each plan, 144 shape- and distance-based geometric features describing the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, and applicator were extracted. Nested five-fold cross-validation combined minimum-redundancy–maximum-relevance feature selection with five classifiers (k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest, support-vector classifier) and two voting ensembles (hard and soft voting). Model performance was benchmarked against single-factor rules (HR-CTV > 30 cm³; maximum lateral HR-CTV–tandem distance > 25 mm).

RESULTS

Logistic regression achieved the highest test accuracy 0.849 ± 0.023 and a mean area-under-the-curve (AUC) 0.903 ± 0.033, outperforming the volume rule and matching the distance rule’s AUC 0.907 ± 0.057 while providing greater accuracy 0.805 ± 0.114. These differences were not statistically significant. Feature-importance analysis showed that the maximum HR-CTV–tandem lateral distance and the bladder’s minimal short-axis length consistently dominated model decisions.​ 

CONCLUSIONS

A compact ML tool using two readily measurable geometric features can reliably assist clinicians in choosing between ICBT and IC/ISBT, thereby reducing inter-physician variability and promoting standardized HDR cervical brachytherapy technique selection.
目的:开发和评估一种机器学习(ML)决策支持工具,用于标准化高剂量率(HDR)宫颈癌腔内近距离放疗(ICBT)与腔内/间质混合近距离放疗(IC/ISBT)的选择。方法和材料:我们回顾性分析了2022年4月至2024年6月期间连续治疗的50例患者的159个HDR近距离治疗方案。近距离治疗技术(ICBT或IC/ISBT)由经验丰富的放射肿瘤学家使用基于CT/ mri的三维图像引导近距离治疗确定。对于每个方案,提取144个基于形状和距离的几何特征,描述高危临床靶体积(HR-CTV)、膀胱、直肠和涂抹器。嵌套五重交叉验证结合了最小冗余最大相关性特征选择与五个分类器(k近邻,逻辑回归,naïve贝叶斯,随机森林,支持向量分类器)和两个投票集成(硬投票和软投票)。模型性能以单因素规则为基准(HR-CTV > 30 cm³;HR-CTV-tandem最大横向距离> 25 mm)。结果:Logistic回归的最高检验精度为0.849±0.023,平均曲线下面积(AUC)为0.903±0.033,优于体积规则,与距离规则的AUC(0.907±0.057)相匹配,准确度为0.805±0.114。这些差异没有统计学意义。特征重要性分析表明,最大hr - ctv串联侧向距离和膀胱最小短轴长度始终主导着模型决策。结论:使用两个易于测量的几何特征的紧凑ML工具可以可靠地帮助临床医生在ICBT和IC/ISBT之间进行选择,从而减少医生之间的差异,促进标准化的HDR颈椎近距离治疗技术选择。
{"title":"A machine learning-based decision support tool for standardizing intracavitary versus interstitial brachytherapy technique selection in high-dose-rate cervical cancer","authors":"Tomohiro Kajikawa ,&nbsp;Koji Masui ,&nbsp;Koji Sakai ,&nbsp;Tadashi Takenaka ,&nbsp;Gen Suzuki ,&nbsp;Yuki Yoshino ,&nbsp;Hikaru Nemoto ,&nbsp;Hideya Yamazaki ,&nbsp;Kei Yamada","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To develop and evaluate a machine-learning (ML) decision-support tool that standardizes selection of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) versus hybrid intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) in high-dose-rate (HDR) cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS AND MATERIALS</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 159 HDR brachytherapy plans from 50 consecutive patients treated between April 2022 and June 2024. Brachytherapy techniques (ICBT or IC/ISBT) were determined by an experienced radiation oncologist using CT/MRI-based 3-D image-guided brachytherapy. For each plan, 144 shape- and distance-based geometric features describing the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, and applicator were extracted. Nested five-fold cross-validation combined minimum-redundancy–maximum-relevance feature selection with five classifiers (k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest, support-vector classifier) and two voting ensembles (hard and soft voting). Model performance was benchmarked against single-factor rules (HR-CTV &gt; 30 cm³; maximum lateral HR-CTV–tandem distance &gt; 25 mm).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Logistic regression achieved the highest test accuracy 0.849 ± 0.023 and a mean area-under-the-curve (AUC) 0.903 ± 0.033, outperforming the volume rule and matching the distance rule’s AUC 0.907 ± 0.057 while providing greater accuracy 0.805 ± 0.114. These differences were not statistically significant. Feature-importance analysis showed that the maximum HR-CTV–tandem lateral distance and the bladder’s minimal short-axis length consistently dominated model decisions.​<!--> </div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>A compact ML tool using two readily measurable geometric features can reliably assist clinicians in choosing between ICBT and IC/ISBT, thereby reducing inter-physician variability and promoting standardized HDR cervical brachytherapy technique selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 863-871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A biologically effective dose–based framework for integrating LDR brachytherapy and EBRT in glioblastoma treatment 结合LDR近距离治疗和EBRT治疗胶质母细胞瘤的生物有效剂量框架。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.003
Adam C. Turner , Elliot M. Abbott , Michael A. Garcia , Sita Patel , Kimberly M. Johnson , David G. Brachman

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is a core component of the standard of care (SOC) for glioblastoma (GBM), yet outcomes remain poor. Rapid early progression (REP) between maximal safe resection and start of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with reduced survival. The GESTALT trial (NCT05342883) investigates whether initiating low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) at time of resection can mitigate rates of REP prior to EBRT. This work presents a framework for integrating LDRBT and EBRT to deliver a composite biologically effective dose (BED) distribution comparable to SOC and demonstrates its feasibility for clinical use.

METHODS

A voxel-level optimization framework was developed to account for LDRBT BED when planning EBRT. The method was applied to generate EBRT plans for 34 GESTALT trial patients following resection and intraoperative implantation of GammaTile® cesium-131 LDRBT devices. Plan quality metrics and doses to organs at risk (OAR) were compared to trial requirements to demonstrate feasibility and safety.

RESULTS

Mean composite target dose coverage was statistically equivalent to prescribed doses while achieving similar dose conformity as SOC EBRT delivered using modern techniques. Composite dose constraints for OARs were met in most cases, with constraint violations observed in fewer than 10% of patients for any individual structure.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a novel approach to account for LDRBT when optimizing EBRT to deliver a desired composite BED. These results support earlier initiation of radiation with LDRBT for GBM and establish a basis for forthcoming analyses of clinical outcomes and model performance in the GESTALT trial.
目的:放射治疗是胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)标准治疗(SOC)的核心组成部分,但结果仍然很差。最大安全切除和开始外束放射治疗(EBRT)之间的快速早期进展(REP)与生存率降低有关。GESTALT试验(NCT05342883)调查了在切除时开始低剂量近距离治疗(LDRBT)是否可以在EBRT之前减轻REP的发生率。本研究提出了一个整合LDRBT和EBRT的框架,以提供与SOC相当的复合生物有效剂量(BED)分布,并证明了其临床应用的可行性。方法:在规划EBRT时,开发了一个体素级优化框架来考虑LDRBT BED。该方法被应用于34例GESTALT试验患者切除术和术中植入GammaTile®铯-131 LDRBT装置后的EBRT计划。将计划质量指标和危及器官剂量(OAR)与试验要求进行比较,以证明可行性和安全性。结果:平均复合靶剂量覆盖在统计上与处方剂量相当,同时与使用现代技术的SOC EBRT达到相似的剂量一致性。在大多数情况下,OARs的复合剂量限制得到满足,在任何单个结构中,不到10%的患者违反了限制。结论:这些发现表明,在优化EBRT以提供所需的复合BED时,一种考虑LDRBT的新方法是可行的。这些结果支持早期使用LDRBT治疗GBM,并为即将进行的GESTALT试验的临床结果和模型性能分析奠定了基础。
{"title":"A biologically effective dose–based framework for integrating LDR brachytherapy and EBRT in glioblastoma treatment","authors":"Adam C. Turner ,&nbsp;Elliot M. Abbott ,&nbsp;Michael A. Garcia ,&nbsp;Sita Patel ,&nbsp;Kimberly M. Johnson ,&nbsp;David G. Brachman","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>Radiation therapy is a core component of the standard of care (SOC) for glioblastoma (GBM), yet outcomes remain poor. Rapid early progression (REP) between maximal safe resection and start of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with reduced survival. The GESTALT trial (NCT05342883) investigates whether initiating low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) at time of resection can mitigate rates of REP prior to EBRT. This work presents a framework for integrating LDRBT and EBRT to deliver a composite biologically effective dose (BED) distribution comparable to SOC and demonstrates its feasibility for clinical use.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A voxel-level optimization framework was developed to account for LDRBT BED when planning EBRT. The method was applied to generate EBRT plans for 34 GESTALT trial patients following resection and intraoperative implantation of GammaTile® cesium-131 LDRBT devices. Plan quality metrics and doses to organs at risk (OAR) were compared to trial requirements to demonstrate feasibility and safety.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Mean composite target dose coverage was statistically equivalent to prescribed doses while achieving similar dose conformity as SOC EBRT delivered using modern techniques. Composite dose constraints for OARs were met in most cases, with constraint violations observed in fewer than 10% of patients for any individual structure.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a novel approach to account for LDRBT when optimizing EBRT to deliver a desired composite BED. These results support earlier initiation of radiation with LDRBT for GBM and establish a basis for forthcoming analyses of clinical outcomes and model performance in the GESTALT trial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 949-960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Iterative intraoperative 3T MRI (iMRI)-guided brachytherapy: A prospective study on enhancing implantation precision and dosimetric gains in advanced gynecologic cancers 迭代术中3T MRI (iMRI)引导近距离放疗:提高晚期妇科癌症植入精度和剂量学增益的前瞻性研究。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.06.010
Shrikiriti S. Rajan , Matthew S. Ning , Megan Jacobson , Samantha J. Simiele , Teresa Bruno , Ramez Kouzy , Kyoko Yoshida-Court , Tatiana Cisneros-Napravnik , Henry Yu , Jason Stafford , Yusung Kim , Geena Mathew , Rauda Alicia Cordova , Maliah Domingo , Anuja Jhingran , Lilie L. Lin , Melissa Joyner , Travis T. Sims , Lauren Colbert , Aradhana M. Venkatesan , Ann Klopp

Purpose

To report on primary outcomes and dosimetric results of a prospective clinical trial and protocol for use of iterative intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in gynecologic brachytherapy.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced cervical or vaginal cancer (FIGO stages IB2 – IVA, and stage II-IVA, respectively) undergoing pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT03634267) using iterative 3T iMRI during brachytherapy implant placement. Applicator and optional interstitial needles were placed under iMRI guidance in a 3T clinical MRI scanner. Imaging, dosimetry and clinical outcomes (local control (LC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS)), and acute and long-term toxicity were evaluated prospectively and confirmed by chart review. To explore dosimetric gains, an EQD2 estimate comparing iMRI-guidance versus standard of care guidance, as well as a 3-patient analysis of dose changes with iMRI-guided optimization was included.

Results

Fourteen patients underwent iMRI-guided brachytherapy. Seventy percent (70%) of patients presented with FIGO stage III disease or higher. Median follow-up was 44 months. . Patients had 2-year median LC, RFS, and OS rates of 83.3%, 76%, and 84.6%, respectively. Acute toxicities were minimal with one (1) case of grade 3 nausea. No grade 3 or higher long-term toxicities were observed. Median operating room (OR) time was 283 minutes (range 174-380 mins). On exploratory analysis, implant placement performed with iMRI guidance demonstrated higher HR-CTV D90 doses (mean difference of +784.7 cGy, p = NS) were achieved compared to US and CT guided implantation in the same patients.

Discussion

iMRI-guidance for gynecologic brachytherapy is safe, associated with minimal high-grade toxicity and excellent clinical outcomes. Future studies to optimize resource use, image acquisition efficiency, and identifying predictive imaging features are warranted.
目的:报告一项前瞻性临床试验的主要结果和剂量学结果,以及在妇科近距离治疗中使用迭代术中磁共振成像(iMRI)的方案。方法:局部晚期宫颈癌或阴道癌(FIGO分期分别为IB2 -IVA期和II-IVA期)接受脉冲剂量率(PDR)近距离放疗的患者在近距离治疗植入物放置期间使用迭代3T iMRI纳入前瞻性临床试验(NCT03634267)。在3T临床MRI扫描仪的iMRI引导下放置涂抹器和可选的间质针。影像学、剂量学和临床结果(局部对照(LC)、无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS))以及急性和长期毒性进行前瞻性评估,并通过图表复习确认。为了探讨剂量学增益,比较了imri指导与标准护理指导的EQD2估计,以及imri指导下优化的3例患者剂量变化分析。结果:14例患者接受了imri引导下的近距离治疗。70%的患者表现为FIGO III期或更高。中位随访时间为44个月。患者2年的中位LC、RFS和OS率分别为83.3%、76%和84.6%。急性毒性很小,有1例3级恶心。未观察到3级或以上的长期毒性。手术室时间中位数为283分钟(范围174-380分钟)。在探索性分析中,iMRI引导下的植入物放置显示,与US和CT引导下的植入相比,相同患者的HR-CTV D90剂量更高(平均差值为+784.7 cGy, p = NS)。讨论:imri指导妇科近距离治疗是安全的,具有最小的高级别毒性和良好的临床结果。未来的研究将优化资源利用、图像采集效率和识别预测成像特征。
{"title":"Iterative intraoperative 3T MRI (iMRI)-guided brachytherapy: A prospective study on enhancing implantation precision and dosimetric gains in advanced gynecologic cancers","authors":"Shrikiriti S. Rajan ,&nbsp;Matthew S. Ning ,&nbsp;Megan Jacobson ,&nbsp;Samantha J. Simiele ,&nbsp;Teresa Bruno ,&nbsp;Ramez Kouzy ,&nbsp;Kyoko Yoshida-Court ,&nbsp;Tatiana Cisneros-Napravnik ,&nbsp;Henry Yu ,&nbsp;Jason Stafford ,&nbsp;Yusung Kim ,&nbsp;Geena Mathew ,&nbsp;Rauda Alicia Cordova ,&nbsp;Maliah Domingo ,&nbsp;Anuja Jhingran ,&nbsp;Lilie L. Lin ,&nbsp;Melissa Joyner ,&nbsp;Travis T. Sims ,&nbsp;Lauren Colbert ,&nbsp;Aradhana M. Venkatesan ,&nbsp;Ann Klopp","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.06.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To report on primary outcomes and dosimetric results of a prospective clinical trial and protocol for use of iterative intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in gynecologic brachytherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with locally advanced cervical or vaginal cancer (FIGO stages IB2 – IVA, and stage II-IVA, respectively) undergoing pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT03634267) using iterative 3T iMRI during brachytherapy implant placement. Applicator and optional interstitial needles were placed under iMRI guidance in a 3T clinical MRI scanner. Imaging, dosimetry and clinical outcomes (local control (LC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS)), and acute and long-term toxicity were evaluated prospectively and confirmed by chart review. To explore dosimetric gains, an EQD2 estimate comparing iMRI-guidance versus standard of care guidance, as well as a 3-patient analysis of dose changes with iMRI-guided optimization was included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen patients underwent iMRI-guided brachytherapy. Seventy percent (70%) of patients presented with FIGO stage III disease or higher. Median follow-up was 44 months. . Patients had 2-year median LC, RFS, and OS rates of 83.3%, 76%, and 84.6%, respectively. Acute toxicities were minimal with one (1) case of grade 3 nausea. No grade 3 or higher long-term toxicities were observed. Median operating room (OR) time was 283 minutes (range 174-380 mins). On exploratory analysis, implant placement performed with iMRI guidance demonstrated higher HR-CTV D90 doses (mean difference of +784.7 cGy, <em>p</em> = NS) were achieved compared to US and CT guided implantation in the same patients.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>iMRI-guidance for gynecologic brachytherapy is safe, associated with minimal high-grade toxicity and excellent clinical outcomes. Future studies to optimize resource use, image acquisition efficiency, and identifying predictive imaging features are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 844-853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144860000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accessory secondary plaque in brachytherapy for uveal melanoma 近距离治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的辅助继发斑块。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.05.003
Weilin Song , Adrian Au , Angela Oh , Alan W. Kong , James Lamb , Tara A. McCannel

PURPOSE

We describe the technique, indications and outcomes of an accessory secondary brachytherapy plaque for the treatment of uveal melanoma to provide supplemental tumor coverage for the primary brachytherapy plaque.

METHODS

Retrospective case series was performed to identify brachytherapy plaque cases for the treatment of primary uveal melanoma where an accessory secondary plaque was created to improve treatment coverage of the uveal melanoma, and positioned at the time of removal of the primary brachytherapy plaque. Baseline tumor, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes including tumor control, visual acuity, treatment complications, metastases and death treatment were obtained.

RESULTS

Of 1,144 uveal melanomas treated with brachytherapy over a 19-year period, eight (0.7%) cases were identified where an accessory secondary brachytherapy plaque was used. Six (75%) patients had uveal melanoma involving the ciliary body. After a mean follow up period of 31.5 ± 5.65 (SE) months, seven (87.5%) patients maintained tumor control and the mean visual acuity was logMAR 0.84 ± 0.57 (Snellen equivalent 20/138). Two (25%) patients developed metastasis, and one (12.5%) patient died of metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

An accessory brachytherapy plaque is a practical solution to manage unexpected deficiencies in plaque coverage of the primary melanoma which avoids treatment delay and minimizes time for potential tumor growth. It may also avoid suboptimal adjunctive treatment options, such as transpupillary thermotherapy, and eliminates radioactive source loss if an entirely new brachytherapy plaque was created. A well-matched accessory secondary plaque may also better conform to the target than a generic plaque with a larger diameter.
目的:我们描述了用于治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的辅助继发性近距离治疗斑块的技术、适应症和结果,以提供原发性近距离治疗斑块的补充肿瘤覆盖。方法:采用回顾性病例系列,确定用于治疗原发性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的近距离治疗斑块病例,其中创建辅助继发斑块以提高葡萄膜黑色素瘤的治疗覆盖率,并定位在原发性近距离治疗斑块移除时。获得基线肿瘤、患者特征和临床结果,包括肿瘤控制、视力、治疗并发症、转移和死亡治疗。结果:在19年期间接受近距离治疗的1144例葡萄膜黑色素瘤中,有8例(0.7%)被确定为辅助继发性近距离治疗斑块。6例(75%)患者有累及睫状体的葡萄膜黑色素瘤。平均随访31.5 ± 5.65 (SE)个月后,7例(87.5%)患者保持肿瘤控制,平均视力为logMAR 0.84 ± 0.57 (Snellen等效20/138)。2例(25%)患者发生转移,1例(12.5%)患者死于转移性疾病。结论:辅助近距离治疗斑块是一种实用的解决方案,可以解决原发性黑色素瘤斑块覆盖的意外缺陷,避免治疗延误并最大限度地减少潜在肿瘤生长的时间。它还可以避免次优的辅助治疗选择,如上突热疗,并消除放射源损失,如果一个全新的近距离治疗斑块的产生。与直径较大的普通斑块相比,匹配良好的附属继发斑块也可能更好地符合靶标。
{"title":"Accessory secondary plaque in brachytherapy for uveal melanoma","authors":"Weilin Song ,&nbsp;Adrian Au ,&nbsp;Angela Oh ,&nbsp;Alan W. Kong ,&nbsp;James Lamb ,&nbsp;Tara A. McCannel","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>We describe the technique, indications and outcomes of an accessory secondary brachytherapy plaque for the treatment of uveal melanoma to provide supplemental tumor coverage for the primary brachytherapy plaque.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Retrospective case series was performed to identify brachytherapy plaque cases for the treatment of primary uveal melanoma where an accessory secondary plaque was created to improve treatment coverage of the uveal melanoma, and positioned at the time of removal of the primary brachytherapy plaque. Baseline tumor, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes including tumor control, visual acuity, treatment complications, metastases and death treatment were obtained.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Of 1,144 uveal melanomas treated with brachytherapy over a 19-year period, eight (0.7%) cases were identified where an accessory secondary brachytherapy plaque was used. Six (75%) patients had uveal melanoma involving the ciliary body. After a mean follow up period of 31.5 ± 5.65 (SE) months, seven (87.5%) patients maintained tumor control and the mean visual acuity was logMAR 0.84 ± 0.57 (Snellen equivalent 20/138). Two (25%) patients developed metastasis, and one (12.5%) patient died of metastatic disease.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>An accessory brachytherapy plaque is a practical solution to manage unexpected deficiencies in plaque coverage of the primary melanoma which avoids treatment delay and minimizes time for potential tumor growth. It may also avoid suboptimal adjunctive treatment options, such as transpupillary thermotherapy, and eliminates radioactive source loss if an entirely new brachytherapy plaque was created. A well-matched accessory secondary plaque may also better conform to the target than a generic plaque with a larger diameter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 5","pages":"Pages 807-813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144791020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gel spacer-assisted salvage brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: A single-institution retrospective study 凝胶间隔辅助挽救近距离治疗宫颈癌晚期放化疗后盆腔复发:一项单机构回顾性研究。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.002
Kae Okuma , Naoya Murakami , Koji Inaba , Tairo Kashihara , Akane Yoshiba , Ayaka Nagao , Kana Takahashi , Madoka Sakuramachi , Hiroshi Igaki

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gel spacer-assisted high-dose-rate (HDR) salvage brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients who underwent salvage HDR interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence following definitive CRT for cervical cancer between 2016 and 2024. Gel spacers were injected between the recurrent tumors and adjacent organs at risk (OARs), mainly the rectum and bladder, under transrectal ultrasound guidance at each brachytherapy session. The spacer’s effectiveness was evaluated by comparing the hypothetical dose delivered to the gel spacer volume (assuming no spacer was used) with the actual dose to the OARs.

RESULTS

The median biological equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 10) delivered during reirradiation was 64.0 Gy (range: 44.5–72.0 Gy). After a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 0–93 months), the complete response rate was 66.7% (10/15). Gel spacer injection significantly reduced the rectal D2cc by a median of 29% (interquartile range [IQR]: 14%–55%) and the bladder D2cc by 16% (IQR: 10%–34%) compared with the hypothetical dose estimates assuming no spacer use (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.001). Grade ≥3 late toxicities occurred in only one patient (10.0%) among complete responders, and no spacer-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gel spacer-assisted salvage brachytherapy significantly reduced radiation exposure to critical OARs, particularly the rectum, while achieving effective tumor control in patients with pelvic recurrence of cervical cancer after definitive CRT. These promising results support this approach as a feasible and safe strategy, warranting further validation in larger prospective studies.
目的:评价凝胶间隔辅助高剂量率(HDR)补救性近距离放射治疗宫颈癌晚期放化疗(CRT)后盆腔复发的安全性和有效性。方法和材料:我们回顾性分析了2016年至2024年间连续15例宫颈癌确诊CRT后盆腔复发接受补救性HDR间质近距离放疗的患者。在每次近距离治疗期间,在经直肠超声引导下,在复发肿瘤和邻近危险器官(主要是直肠和膀胱)之间注射凝胶间隔剂。通过比较凝胶隔离剂体积的假设剂量(假设没有使用隔离剂)与桨的实际剂量来评估隔离剂的有效性。结果:再照射期间2 Gy组分(EQD2, α/β = 10)的中位生物等效剂量为64.0 Gy(范围:44.5-72.0 Gy)。中位随访22个月(范围:0 ~ 93个月),完全缓解率为66.7%(10/15)。与不使用间隔剂的假设剂量估计相比,凝胶间隔剂注射显著降低直肠D2cc中位数29%(四分位数间距[IQR]: 14%-55%),膀胱D2cc显著降低16% (IQR: 10%-34%) (Wilcoxon sign -rank检验,p )。凝胶间隔辅助的补救性近距离放疗显著减少了关键桨叶的辐射暴露,特别是直肠,同时对宫颈癌盆腔复发患者在最终CRT后实现了有效的肿瘤控制。这些有希望的结果支持这种方法是可行和安全的策略,需要在更大的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。
{"title":"Gel spacer-assisted salvage brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: A single-institution retrospective study","authors":"Kae Okuma ,&nbsp;Naoya Murakami ,&nbsp;Koji Inaba ,&nbsp;Tairo Kashihara ,&nbsp;Akane Yoshiba ,&nbsp;Ayaka Nagao ,&nbsp;Kana Takahashi ,&nbsp;Madoka Sakuramachi ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Igaki","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gel spacer-assisted high-dose-rate (HDR) salvage brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS AND MATERIALS</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients who underwent salvage HDR interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence following definitive CRT for cervical cancer between 2016 and 2024. Gel spacers were injected between the recurrent tumors and adjacent organs at risk (OARs), mainly the rectum and bladder, under transrectal ultrasound guidance at each brachytherapy session. The spacer’s effectiveness was evaluated by comparing the hypothetical dose delivered to the gel spacer volume (assuming no spacer was used) with the actual dose to the OARs.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The median biological equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 10) delivered during reirradiation was 64.0 Gy (range: 44.5–72.0 Gy). After a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 0–93 months), the complete response rate was 66.7% (10/15). Gel spacer injection significantly reduced the rectal D2cc by a median of 29% (interquartile range [IQR]: 14%–55%) and the bladder D2cc by 16% (IQR: 10%–34%) compared with the hypothetical dose estimates assuming no spacer use (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Grade ≥3 late toxicities occurred in only one patient (10.0%) among complete responders, and no spacer-related adverse events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Gel spacer-assisted salvage brachytherapy significantly reduced radiation exposure to critical OARs, particularly the rectum, while achieving effective tumor control in patients with pelvic recurrence of cervical cancer after definitive CRT. These promising results support this approach as a feasible and safe strategy, warranting further validation in larger prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 5","pages":"Pages 684-693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intra-operative process efficiency for in-room MRI-guided combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer 室内mri引导下腔内/间质联合近距离治疗宫颈癌术中疗效分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.001
Kitty Chan , Heather Ballantyne , Zhihui Amy Liu , Michael Milosevic , Jennifer Croke , Anthony Fyles , Jelena Lukovic , Alexandra Rink , Akbar Beiki-Ardakani , Jette Borg , Monica Serban , Robert A. Weersink , Jessica L. Conway , Sarah Rauth , Julia Skliarenko , Jason Xie , Anna Simeonov , Kathy Han

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy (MRgBT) is the gold-standard treatment for cervical cancer. This study examined workflow times in an integrated MRgBT suite and conventional operating room (OR), and factors contributing to intraoperative efficiency.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Consecutive patients with FIGO stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who underwent MRgBT procedures between 2019-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Workflow times were collected: applicator insertion, MR-imaging, contouring, treatment planning, treatment execution and total procedure time. Procedure durations between applicators and over time were compared.

RESULTS

The 161 patients included in this study underwent 267 procedures in the MRgBT suite, and 56 procedures in the OR using ovoid and tandem applicator (O&T, 46%), ring and tandem (R&T, 28%), or Syed-Neblett template (Template, 27%). The median duration (minutes) of each step was: general anesthesia induction (18), applicator insertion (31), MR-imaging (28), parallel contouring (48) and applicator/needle registration & treatment plan optimization (83), and treatment execution (19). Total procedure time was much longer in the OR (488 minutes) than MRgBT suite (205 minutes). Template cases were significantly longer in insertion, MR-imaging, contouring, planning and total procedure time (by 52 minutes) compared with those using the R&T/O&T applicators (p<0.001). Total procedure time for Template cases reduced by 10 minutes/year since 2019 (p<0.001). Regardless of applicator type, total procedure time for subsequent insertions was 21 minutes less than the first (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MRgBT procedure time was longer for Syed-Neblett template cases, but shorter in subsequent insertions. The overall procedure time was much shorter in the integrated MRgBT suite than conventional OR.
目的:磁共振成像引导近距离放射治疗(MRgBT)是宫颈癌治疗的金标准。本研究考察了综合MRgBT套件和传统手术室(OR)的工作流程时间,以及影响术中效率的因素。方法和材料:回顾性分析2019-2022年期间连续接受MRgBT手术的FIGO期IB-IVA宫颈癌患者。收集工作流程时间:涂抹器插入、磁共振成像、轮廓、治疗计划、治疗执行和总手术时间。比较了涂抹器和随时间的过程持续时间。结果:本研究纳入的161例患者在MRgBT套件中进行了267次手术,在手术室中使用卵圆和串联涂抹器(O&T, 46%),环和串联涂抹器(R&T, 28%)或Syed-Neblett模板(template, 27%)进行了56次手术。每个步骤的中位持续时间(分钟)为:全麻诱导(18)、涂抹器插入(31)、磁共振成像(28)、平行轮廓(48)、涂抹器/针头注册和治疗计划优化(83)、治疗执行(19)。总的手术时间(488分钟)比MRgBT套件(205分钟)要长得多。与使用R&T/O&T涂布器的患者相比,模板病例在插入、核磁共振成像、轮廓、计划和总手术时间(52分钟)方面明显更长(结论:Syed-Neblett模板病例的MRgBT手术时间更长,但随后的插入时间更短)。综合MRgBT套件的整体手术时间比传统手术室短得多。
{"title":"Intra-operative process efficiency for in-room MRI-guided combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer","authors":"Kitty Chan ,&nbsp;Heather Ballantyne ,&nbsp;Zhihui Amy Liu ,&nbsp;Michael Milosevic ,&nbsp;Jennifer Croke ,&nbsp;Anthony Fyles ,&nbsp;Jelena Lukovic ,&nbsp;Alexandra Rink ,&nbsp;Akbar Beiki-Ardakani ,&nbsp;Jette Borg ,&nbsp;Monica Serban ,&nbsp;Robert A. Weersink ,&nbsp;Jessica L. Conway ,&nbsp;Sarah Rauth ,&nbsp;Julia Skliarenko ,&nbsp;Jason Xie ,&nbsp;Anna Simeonov ,&nbsp;Kathy Han","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy (MRgBT) is the gold-standard treatment for cervical cancer. This study examined workflow times in an integrated MRgBT suite and conventional operating room (OR), and factors contributing to intraoperative efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS AND MATERIALS</h3><div>Consecutive patients with FIGO stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who underwent MRgBT procedures between 2019-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Workflow times were collected: applicator insertion, MR-imaging, contouring, treatment planning, treatment execution and total procedure time. Procedure durations between applicators and over time were compared.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The 161 patients included in this study underwent 267 procedures in the MRgBT suite, and 56 procedures in the OR using ovoid and tandem applicator (O&amp;T, 46%), ring and tandem (R&amp;T, 28%), or Syed-Neblett template (Template, 27%). The median duration (minutes) of each step was: general anesthesia induction (<span><span>18</span></span>), applicator insertion (31), MR-imaging (28), parallel contouring (48) and applicator/needle registration &amp; treatment plan optimization (83), and treatment execution (19). Total procedure time was much longer in the OR (488 minutes) than MRgBT suite (205 minutes). Template cases were significantly longer in insertion, MR-imaging, contouring, planning and total procedure time (by 52 minutes) compared with those using the R&amp;T/O&amp;T applicators (p&lt;0.001). Total procedure time for Template cases reduced by 10 minutes/year since 2019 (p&lt;0.001). Regardless of applicator type, total procedure time for subsequent insertions was 21 minutes less than the first (p&lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>MRgBT procedure time was longer for Syed-Neblett template cases, but shorter in subsequent insertions. The overall procedure time was much shorter in the integrated MRgBT suite than conventional OR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 5","pages":"Pages 729-737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144765890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Brachytherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1