首页 > 最新文献

Brachytherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and experience of PSA bounce after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer predicts clinical failure 前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 最低值和低剂量近距离放射治疗前列腺癌后 PSA 反弹的经验可预测临床失败。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.09.003
Yasushi Nakai , Nobumichi Tanaka , Isao Asakawa , Kenta Onishi , Makito Miyake , Kaori Yamaki , Kiyohide Fujimoto

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold and PSA bounce are associated with oncological control after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), considering serum testosterone levels.

METHODS

This study enrolled 944 prostate cancer patients treated at a single institution with LDR-BT alone or LDR-BT combined with EBRT, with or without ADT. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to clinical failure, including experience of PSA bounce between baseline and 2, 4, or 7 years after LDR-BT and PSA value (0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL) with normal testosterone levels at 2, 4, and 7 years after LDR-BT, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients with normal testosterone levels and a PSA of 0.2 or 0.5 ng/mL at 2, 4, and 7 years after LDR-BT had a significantly better clinical failure free rate (CFFR) than those with PSA levels >0.2 or >0.5 ng/mL or low testosterone levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that PSA <0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL with normal testosterone levels at 2, 4, and 7 years and experience of PSA bounce between baseline and 2 or 4 years after LDR-BT were significantly related to better CFFR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with normal serum testosterone levels who reached PSA of <0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL after LDR-BT, or those who experienced PSA bounce, showed better oncological control.
研究目的本研究旨在评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)阈值和 PSA 反弹是否与单独使用低剂量近距离放射治疗(LDR-BT)或与外照射放疗(EBRT)、使用或不使用雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)后的肿瘤控制有关,同时考虑血清睾酮水平:这项研究共纳入了在一家医疗机构接受单独 LDR-BT 或 LDR-BT 联合 EBRT 治疗的 944 名前列腺癌患者,无论患者是否接受 ADT 治疗。采用Fine-Gray危险模型评估与临床失败相关的因素,包括基线与LDR-BT后2、4或7年之间PSA反弹的经历,以及LDR-BT后2、4和7年时睾酮水平正常的PSA值(0.1、0.2或0.5纳克/毫升):结果:在LDR-BT术后2年、4年和7年,睾酮水平正常且PSA为0.2或0.5纳克/毫升的患者的临床无失败率(CFFR)明显高于PSA水平>0.2或>0.5纳克/毫升或睾酮水平低的患者。多变量分析显示,PSA血清睾酮水平正常的患者,如果 PSA 达到
{"title":"Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and experience of PSA bounce after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer predicts clinical failure","authors":"Yasushi Nakai ,&nbsp;Nobumichi Tanaka ,&nbsp;Isao Asakawa ,&nbsp;Kenta Onishi ,&nbsp;Makito Miyake ,&nbsp;Kaori Yamaki ,&nbsp;Kiyohide Fujimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to assess if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold and PSA bounce are associated with oncological control after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), considering serum testosterone levels.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This study enrolled 944 prostate cancer patients treated at a single institution with LDR-BT alone or LDR-BT combined with EBRT, with or without ADT. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to clinical failure, including experience of PSA bounce between baseline and 2, 4, or 7 years after LDR-BT and PSA value (0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL) with normal testosterone levels at 2, 4, and 7 years after LDR-BT, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Patients with normal testosterone levels and a PSA of 0.2 or 0.5 ng/mL at 2, 4, and 7 years after LDR-BT had a significantly better clinical failure free rate (CFFR) than those with PSA levels &gt;0.2 or &gt;0.5 ng/mL or low testosterone levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that PSA &lt;0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL with normal testosterone levels at 2, 4, and 7 years and experience of PSA bounce between baseline and 2 or 4 years after LDR-BT were significantly related to better CFFR.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Patients with normal serum testosterone levels who reached PSA of &lt;0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL after LDR-BT, or those who experienced PSA bounce, showed better oncological control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages 727-736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MPP05 Presentation Time: 4:45 PM MPP05 演讲时间:下午 4:45
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.019
Grzegorz Bielęda PhD , Anna Marach MSc , Adam Chichel MD PhD , Natalia Langner MSc , Artur Chyrek MD PhD , Adam Kluska MD PhD , Wojciech Burchardt MD PhD , Grzegorz Zwierzchowski PhD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Contact brachytherapy for non-melanoma skin cancers demonstrates very good treatment results. The main problem is to fit properly a standard applicator to a heavily pleated surface, such as the nasal or orbital region. In order to improve the reproducibility and quality of dose distributions, we have introduced individual custom-designed applicators manufactured on a 3D printer. The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of changing the contoured CTV volume between the pre-plan and the therapeutic plan.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>For the study, 95 consecutive treatment plans were qualified for patients treated between 2021 and 2023 with individual contact applicators for skin brachytherapy. After the qualification, on the first visit in brachytherapy department, the patient had fiducial radiological markers surrounding the skin lesion placed and the CT scan performed. On the images, the physician contoured the volume of the CTV and critical organs. Based on the CT images and contours, medical physicist prepared the body of the applicator, the position of the catheters and the optimal source dwell positions in treatment planning system. The proposed dose distribution was consulted with the physician for verification. After approval, the DICOM files were exported to software converting DICOM files to printable stl files and the applicator was printed. At the next visit, the patient was CT scanned with the applicator in place and a treatment plan was prepared, based on the recontoured CTV and critical organs. We compared CTV volume values and dose distribution values in reconstructed critical organs and CTV for the pre-plan and approved treatment plan. We considered CTV volume, V100, V150 and D90. For OARs we compared doses in 0.1, 1 and 2 ccm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since the parameters studied did not show conformity to the normal distribution (the Shapiro-Wilk test was used) we applied the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The compared parameters for the evaluation of the treatment plan appeared to be consistent with each other within the limits assumed for the tests performed (α=0.05), except for the maximum doses in the lenses. The doses in 0.1 cc of lens in the realized plans were found to be statistically significantly lower than in the plans created at the time of applicator design. Left lens pre-plan D0.1 = 12.86% vs 11.48% (p=0,005441) in treatment plan, right lens pre-plan D.01 = 9.67% vs 8.02% (p=0,005694) in treatment plan. During the preparation of the final treatment plans, physicists suspected physicians to contour larger CTV volumes than during the pre-plan and the applicator design. A surprising result of this study was that although not statistically significant but the mean CTV volume in the pre-plan was higher than in the contour made for the final treatment plan (1.69 ccm vs. 1.61 ccm). The main investigator thought before performing the statistics that the relati
目的接触近距离放射治疗非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的疗效非常好。主要问题是如何将标准涂抹器与鼻腔或眼眶等褶皱较多的表面正确贴合。为了提高剂量分布的可重复性和质量,我们引入了通过 3D 打印机制造的个性化定制涂抹器。本研究的目的是验证在预计划和治疗计划之间改变轮廓 CTV 容积的效果。在本研究中,我们对 2021 年至 2023 年期间使用个体接触式涂抹器进行皮肤近距离放射治疗的患者的 95 个连续治疗计划进行了鉴定。合格后,在近距离治疗部门的首次就诊中,患者在皮肤病变周围放置了放射性靶标,并进行了 CT 扫描。医生在图像上绘制了 CTV 和重要器官的轮廓。根据 CT 图像和轮廓,医学物理学家在治疗计划系统中准备了涂抹器主体、导管位置和最佳放射源停留位置。建议的剂量分布需要咨询医生进行验证。获得批准后,将 DICOM 文件导出到软件中,将 DICOM 文件转换为可打印的 stl 文件,然后打印涂抹器。在下一次就诊时,患者在安装了涂抹器的情况下接受 CT 扫描,并根据重塑的 CTV 和重要器官制定治疗计划。我们比较了预计划和批准的治疗计划的 CTV 容量值和重建关键器官与 CTV 的剂量分布值。我们考虑了 CTV 体积、V100、V150 和 D90。结果由于所研究的参数不符合正态分布(采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验),我们采用了 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。除了镜片中的最大剂量外,用于评估治疗方案的比较参数似乎在所做检验的假设范围内(α=0.05)是一致的。在已实现的计划中,0.1 毫升镜片中的剂量在统计学上明显低于设计涂抹器时的计划。左镜片前计划 D0.1 = 12.86% 对治疗计划中的 11.48% (p=0,005441),右镜片前计划 D.01 = 9.67% 对治疗计划中的 8.02% (p=0,005694)。在最终治疗方案的准备过程中,物理学家怀疑医生的 CTV 容积比预计划和涂抹器设计时更大。这项研究的一个令人惊讶的结果是,虽然没有统计学意义,但预计划中的平均 CTV 容量高于最终治疗计划的轮廓(1.69 厘米对 1.61 厘米)。结论使用 3D 打印技术制造的个性化涂抹器进行皮肤近距离治疗时,所准备的治疗方案与涂抹器设计时准备的治疗方案没有统计学差异。只有最终接受照射的治疗方案中沉积在透镜中的最大剂量在统计学上低于预先制定的方案。在编制最终计划时,对CTV和关键器官的重新塑形并未影响剂量分布,这表明在3D打印机上编制的单个涂抹器与患者体表贴合得很好。
{"title":"MPP05 Presentation Time: 4:45 PM","authors":"Grzegorz Bielęda PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Marach MSc ,&nbsp;Adam Chichel MD PhD ,&nbsp;Natalia Langner MSc ,&nbsp;Artur Chyrek MD PhD ,&nbsp;Adam Kluska MD PhD ,&nbsp;Wojciech Burchardt MD PhD ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Zwierzchowski PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Contact brachytherapy for non-melanoma skin cancers demonstrates very good treatment results. The main problem is to fit properly a standard applicator to a heavily pleated surface, such as the nasal or orbital region. In order to improve the reproducibility and quality of dose distributions, we have introduced individual custom-designed applicators manufactured on a 3D printer. The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of changing the contoured CTV volume between the pre-plan and the therapeutic plan.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;For the study, 95 consecutive treatment plans were qualified for patients treated between 2021 and 2023 with individual contact applicators for skin brachytherapy. After the qualification, on the first visit in brachytherapy department, the patient had fiducial radiological markers surrounding the skin lesion placed and the CT scan performed. On the images, the physician contoured the volume of the CTV and critical organs. Based on the CT images and contours, medical physicist prepared the body of the applicator, the position of the catheters and the optimal source dwell positions in treatment planning system. The proposed dose distribution was consulted with the physician for verification. After approval, the DICOM files were exported to software converting DICOM files to printable stl files and the applicator was printed. At the next visit, the patient was CT scanned with the applicator in place and a treatment plan was prepared, based on the recontoured CTV and critical organs. We compared CTV volume values and dose distribution values in reconstructed critical organs and CTV for the pre-plan and approved treatment plan. We considered CTV volume, V100, V150 and D90. For OARs we compared doses in 0.1, 1 and 2 ccm.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Since the parameters studied did not show conformity to the normal distribution (the Shapiro-Wilk test was used) we applied the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The compared parameters for the evaluation of the treatment plan appeared to be consistent with each other within the limits assumed for the tests performed (α=0.05), except for the maximum doses in the lenses. The doses in 0.1 cc of lens in the realized plans were found to be statistically significantly lower than in the plans created at the time of applicator design. Left lens pre-plan D0.1 = 12.86% vs 11.48% (p=0,005441) in treatment plan, right lens pre-plan D.01 = 9.67% vs 8.02% (p=0,005694) in treatment plan. During the preparation of the final treatment plans, physicists suspected physicians to contour larger CTV volumes than during the pre-plan and the applicator design. A surprising result of this study was that although not statistically significant but the mean CTV volume in the pre-plan was higher than in the contour made for the final treatment plan (1.69 ccm vs. 1.61 ccm). The main investigator thought before performing the statistics that the relati","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
GSOR08 Presentation Time: 5:35 PM GSOR08 演讲时间:下午 5:35
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.054
Mayank Patel MD MBA , Samyukta Jhavar BS , Gaurav Gomber BS , Anne Hubbard MBA , Ann Klopp MD PhD , Andrew Farach MD , Michelle Ludwig MD MPH PhD

Purpose

Brachytherapy is a critical component of definitive cervical cancer treatment. Timely access to treatment has shown an improved survival benefit. Texas is the second largest state by size and population in the US. Here we explore the geographic availability of brachytherapy (BT) centers in the state.

Materials and Methods

We queried publicly available data on cervical cancer incidence and mortality between 2010-2020 from the Texas Cancer Registry. Available BT centers were compiled from the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Radiation Control Program and verified by direct contact with each treating institution. Number of BT units per 1,000 new cases was calculated as an index of BT availability.

Results

The state currently has 48 institutions actively treating cervical cancer with definitive tandem & ring/ovoid intracavitary BT. Texas DSHS geographically divided the state into 11 public health regions (PHR) to support and coordinate the local health needs of the entire state. PHR 8 located in the south-central region has the lowest availability of centers (1.23 centers/1,000 new cases), while PHR 1 in the north region has the highest availability (8.73 centers/1,000 new cases). The overall Texas incidence rate, mortality rate, and BT availability is 9.4 per 100,000 (US rate 7.7), 2.8 per 100,000 (US rate 2.6), and 3.43 per 1,000 new cases, respectively. In Texas, it is estimated that 45% of cases are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. The overall state locally advanced incidence rate is 4.2 cases per 100,000 population, which is 55% higher than the national locally advanced incidence rate of 2.7. Annually, 31% of all cervical cancer patients diagnosed in Texas die from the disease, as compared to only 10% nationally. On the county level, Henderson County has the highest mortality rate (5.8 deaths per 100,000 population) and no BT availability. Hidalgo County located on the southern border has the highest incidence (500) and deaths (157) of rural counties. Fort Bend County has the highest absolute incidence (263) and deaths (90) for a county without any BT centers. Angelina County has the highest incidence rate (15.9 per 100,000) with a non-zero death rate (3.9 per 100,000).

Conclusions

Compared to national rates, Texas has a higher overall incidence rate of cervical cancer overall and locally advanced cervical cancer highlighting the need for widespread access to BT services across the state. Herein, we review cervical cancer incidence rates, mortality rates, and access to intracavitary BT centers by county and PHR to identify BT deserts across the state. This analysis identifies the highest at-risk populations and opportunities for improved BT access. There is an existing need for expanded geographic access to high-quality BT centers and well-trained brachytherapists across Texas.
目的 近距离放射治疗是宫颈癌确诊治疗的重要组成部分。及时接受治疗可提高生存率。得克萨斯州是美国面积和人口第二大州。在此,我们探讨了该州近距离放射治疗(BT)中心的地理可用性。材料与方法我们查询了德克萨斯州癌症登记处 2010-2020 年间有关宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的公开数据。可用的 BT 中心由德克萨斯州卫生服务部 (DSHS) 辐射控制项目提供,并通过与各治疗机构直接联系进行核实。结果该州目前有 48 家机构在积极使用确定性串联&;环形/卵圆形腔内 BT 治疗宫颈癌。德克萨斯州卫生与社会服务部将全州按地理位置划分为 11 个公共卫生区域 (PHR),以支持和协调全州的地方卫生需求。位于中南部地区的 PHR 8 的中心数量最少(1.23 个中心/1,000 个新病例),而位于北部地区的 PHR 1 的中心数量最多(8.73 个中心/1,000 个新病例)。得克萨斯州的总体发病率、死亡率和 BT 使用率分别为每 10 万人 9.4 例(美国为 7.7 例)、每 10 万人 2.8 例(美国为 2.6 例)和每 1,000 例新病例 3.43 例。在得克萨斯州,估计有 45% 的病例被诊断为局部晚期疾病。该州的总体局部晚期发病率为每 10 万人 4.2 例,比全国局部晚期发病率 2.7 例高出 55%。得克萨斯州每年有 31% 的宫颈癌患者死于宫颈癌,而全国仅有 10% 的患者死于宫颈癌。在县一级,亨德森县(Henderson County)的死亡率最高(每 10 万人中有 5.8 人死亡),而且没有 BT 可用。位于南部边境的伊达尔戈县(Hidalgo County)是发病率(500 例)和死亡率(157 例)最高的农村县。在没有任何 BT 中心的县中,本德堡县的绝对发病率(263 例)和死亡人数(90 例)最高。结论与全国的发病率相比,得克萨斯州的宫颈癌总体发病率和局部晚期宫颈癌的发病率都较高,这凸显了在全州普及 BT 服务的必要性。在此,我们回顾了宫颈癌的发病率、死亡率以及按县和公共卫生登记处划分的腔内 BT 中心的使用情况,以确定全州的 BT 荒漠。这项分析确定了高危人群以及改善 BT 获取途径的机会。目前,德克萨斯州各地都需要扩大优质 BT 中心和训练有素的手足口治疗师的地理覆盖范围。
{"title":"GSOR08 Presentation Time: 5:35 PM","authors":"Mayank Patel MD MBA ,&nbsp;Samyukta Jhavar BS ,&nbsp;Gaurav Gomber BS ,&nbsp;Anne Hubbard MBA ,&nbsp;Ann Klopp MD PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Farach MD ,&nbsp;Michelle Ludwig MD MPH PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.054","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.054","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brachytherapy is a critical component of definitive cervical cancer treatment. Timely access to treatment has shown an improved survival benefit. Texas is the second largest state by size and population in the US. Here we explore the geographic availability of brachytherapy (BT) centers in the state.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We queried publicly available data on cervical cancer incidence and mortality between 2010-2020 from the Texas Cancer Registry. Available BT centers were compiled from the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Radiation Control Program and verified by direct contact with each treating institution. Number of BT units per 1,000 new cases was calculated as an index of BT availability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The state currently has 48 institutions actively treating cervical cancer with definitive tandem &amp; ring/ovoid intracavitary BT. Texas DSHS geographically divided the state into 11 public health regions (PHR) to support and coordinate the local health needs of the entire state. PHR 8 located in the south-central region has the lowest availability of centers (1.23 centers/1,000 new cases), while PHR 1 in the north region has the highest availability (8.73 centers/1,000 new cases). The overall Texas incidence rate, mortality rate, and BT availability is 9.4 per 100,000 (US rate 7.7), 2.8 per 100,000 (US rate 2.6), and 3.43 per 1,000 new cases, respectively. In Texas, it is estimated that 45% of cases are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. The overall state locally advanced incidence rate is 4.2 cases per 100,000 population, which is 55% higher than the national locally advanced incidence rate of 2.7. Annually, 31% of all cervical cancer patients diagnosed in Texas die from the disease, as compared to only 10% nationally. On the county level, Henderson County has the highest mortality rate (5.8 deaths per 100,000 population) and no BT availability. Hidalgo County located on the southern border has the highest incidence (500) and deaths (157) of rural counties. Fort Bend County has the highest absolute incidence (263) and deaths (90) for a county without any BT centers. Angelina County has the highest incidence rate (15.9 per 100,000) with a non-zero death rate (3.9 per 100,000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to national rates, Texas has a higher overall incidence rate of cervical cancer overall and locally advanced cervical cancer highlighting the need for widespread access to BT services across the state. Herein, we review cervical cancer incidence rates, mortality rates, and access to intracavitary BT centers by county and PHR to identify BT deserts across the state. This analysis identifies the highest at-risk populations and opportunities for improved BT access. There is an existing need for expanded geographic access to high-quality BT centers and well-trained brachytherapists across Texas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S45-S46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MSOR10 Presentation Time: 8:45 AM MSOR10 演讲时间:上午 8:45
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.072
Yhana Chavis DO, Kristin Walker MD MBA, Allen Luk MD, Daniel Leach MD, Kara Romano MD, Einsley Janowski MD PhD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brachytherapy (BT) boost is the standard of care technique for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and a critical component of curative treatment. Overall treatment time strongly correlates with local control, with evidence indicating that completion of chemoradiation within 8 weeks is important for clinical outcomes. Socioeconomic and racial factors are also known to contribute to disparities in BT access and have been linked to worsened survival. The aim of our study is to explore factors impacting timely completion of BT treatment amongst LACC patients treated at a single academic institution that serves a large catchment area in the state of Virginia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients diagnosed with LACC receiving their BT at the University of Virginia (UVA) between 2004 and 2021 were identified. Patient demographics and additional characteristics were recorded, including: insurance and employment status, alcohol and/or drug use disorder, and distance from UVA Cancer Center. Based on proven prognostic factors for local control of LACC, the cut off of 56 days to complete treatment was used for stratification, looking at demographic differences between those groups who received timely or prolonged therapy completion. The means for each demographic were compared using standard error and simple unpaired t-tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>124 patients with LACC, FIGO stage IB2 to IV were included Median age of our cohort at time of treatment was 49.8 years. 50% of patients were employed, 42% were unemployed, and 8% had unknown employment status. 79% of patients had listed insurance, 11% had no insurance, and 10% had unknown insurance information. Racial demographics were 74% white, 15% black, 9% Hispanic, 2% Asian, and <1% unidentified. 4% of patients had a history of incarceration, 3% of patients had a known history of or current drug abuse, and 2 of the above patients had both factors. Out of the 124 patients, 24 patients completed concurrent chemoradiation and BT beyond 56 days. The statistically significant social barriers identified in this group included employment, insurance status, and drug use. Employed patients completed treatment on an average of 49.7 ± 1.1 days (range 36-79), compared to 51.44 days ± 1.5 days (range 34-87) for unemployed patients <em>(p</em> = 0.0135). Insured patients completed their treatment within 50.6 ± 0.9 days (range 43-71), compared to 59.14 ± 1.9 days (range 34-87) for uninsured, (<em>p</em> = 0.035). On average, white, Hispanic, and black women completed treatment in 50.9 ± 1.02 days, 48.9 ± 1.58 days, and 54.0 ± 2.5 days, respectively (<em>p</em>=0.20 for white versus black cohorts). Average completion time was 50.6 ± 0.9 (range 34-87) in the non-incarcerated group compared to 55 ± 5 days (range 47-70) in the incarcerated group, <em>p</em> =0.32, and average completion time was 50.3 ± 0.9 days (range 34-87) in the non-drug use compared to 65.5 ± 2.1 day
目的近距离放疗(BT)是治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的标准技术,也是治愈性治疗的关键组成部分。整体治疗时间与局部控制密切相关,有证据表明,在 8 周内完成化疗对临床结果非常重要。众所周知,社会经济和种族因素也是造成 BT 治疗机会不均等的原因之一,并与生存率下降有关。我们的研究旨在探讨影响在弗吉尼亚州一个服务范围较大的学术机构接受治疗的 LACC 患者及时完成 BT 治疗的因素。记录了患者的人口统计学特征和其他特征,包括:保险和就业状况、酗酒和/或吸毒障碍以及与弗吉尼亚大学癌症中心的距离。根据已证实的 LACC 局部控制预后因素,以完成治疗的 56 天为分界线进行分层,观察及时完成治疗组和延长完成治疗组之间的人口统计学差异。采用标准误差和简单的非配对 t 检验比较了各人口统计学指标的平均值。结果 124 例 FIGO IB2 至 IV 期 LACC 患者接受治疗时的中位年龄为 49.8 岁。50%的患者有工作,42%失业,8%就业状况不明。79%的患者有保险,11%的患者没有保险,10%的患者保险信息不详。种族人口统计为 74% 白人、15% 黑人、9% 西班牙人、2% 亚洲人和 1% 身份不明的人。4%的患者有监禁史,3%的患者有已知的吸毒史或目前正在吸毒,上述患者中有 2 人同时具有这两种因素。在 124 名患者中,有 24 名患者在 56 天后同时完成了化疗和 BT。在这组患者中发现的具有统计学意义的社会障碍包括就业、保险状况和吸毒。就业患者平均在 49.7 天 ± 1.1 天(范围 36-79)内完成治疗,而失业患者平均在 51.44 天 ± 1.5 天(范围 34-87)内完成治疗(p = 0.0135)。参保患者在 50.6 ± 0.9 天(范围 43-71)内完成治疗,而未参保患者在 59.14 ± 1.9 天(范围 34-87)内完成治疗(P = 0.035)。平均而言,白人、西班牙裔和黑人妇女分别在 50.9 ± 1.02 天、48.9 ± 1.58 天和 54.0 ± 2.5 天内完成治疗(白人与黑人队列相比,P=0.20)。非监禁组的平均完成时间为 50.6 ± 0.9 天(范围 34-87),监禁组为 55 ± 5 天(范围 47-70),p=0.32;非吸毒组的平均完成时间为 50.3 ± 0.9 天(范围 34-87),吸毒组为 65.5 ± 2.1 天(范围 61-70),p=0.0016。结论由于社会经济和种族差异的影响,宫颈癌患者往往是一个难以治疗的人群,无法及时为患者提供治疗。我们的分析表明,失业状况、缺乏保险以及目前的药物滥用史与治疗时间延长有关。种族人口统计方面也出现了趋势,但由于样本量较小,统计意义不大。更好地了解导致患者治疗效果不佳的因素,可以帮助我们了解如何在整个治疗过程中为这些患者提供支持。
{"title":"MSOR10 Presentation Time: 8:45 AM","authors":"Yhana Chavis DO,&nbsp;Kristin Walker MD MBA,&nbsp;Allen Luk MD,&nbsp;Daniel Leach MD,&nbsp;Kara Romano MD,&nbsp;Einsley Janowski MD PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.072","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.072","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Brachytherapy (BT) boost is the standard of care technique for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and a critical component of curative treatment. Overall treatment time strongly correlates with local control, with evidence indicating that completion of chemoradiation within 8 weeks is important for clinical outcomes. Socioeconomic and racial factors are also known to contribute to disparities in BT access and have been linked to worsened survival. The aim of our study is to explore factors impacting timely completion of BT treatment amongst LACC patients treated at a single academic institution that serves a large catchment area in the state of Virginia.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Patients diagnosed with LACC receiving their BT at the University of Virginia (UVA) between 2004 and 2021 were identified. Patient demographics and additional characteristics were recorded, including: insurance and employment status, alcohol and/or drug use disorder, and distance from UVA Cancer Center. Based on proven prognostic factors for local control of LACC, the cut off of 56 days to complete treatment was used for stratification, looking at demographic differences between those groups who received timely or prolonged therapy completion. The means for each demographic were compared using standard error and simple unpaired t-tests.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;124 patients with LACC, FIGO stage IB2 to IV were included Median age of our cohort at time of treatment was 49.8 years. 50% of patients were employed, 42% were unemployed, and 8% had unknown employment status. 79% of patients had listed insurance, 11% had no insurance, and 10% had unknown insurance information. Racial demographics were 74% white, 15% black, 9% Hispanic, 2% Asian, and &lt;1% unidentified. 4% of patients had a history of incarceration, 3% of patients had a known history of or current drug abuse, and 2 of the above patients had both factors. Out of the 124 patients, 24 patients completed concurrent chemoradiation and BT beyond 56 days. The statistically significant social barriers identified in this group included employment, insurance status, and drug use. Employed patients completed treatment on an average of 49.7 ± 1.1 days (range 36-79), compared to 51.44 days ± 1.5 days (range 34-87) for unemployed patients &lt;em&gt;(p&lt;/em&gt; = 0.0135). Insured patients completed their treatment within 50.6 ± 0.9 days (range 43-71), compared to 59.14 ± 1.9 days (range 34-87) for uninsured, (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; = 0.035). On average, white, Hispanic, and black women completed treatment in 50.9 ± 1.02 days, 48.9 ± 1.58 days, and 54.0 ± 2.5 days, respectively (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;=0.20 for white versus black cohorts). Average completion time was 50.6 ± 0.9 (range 34-87) in the non-incarcerated group compared to 55 ± 5 days (range 47-70) in the incarcerated group, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; =0.32, and average completion time was 50.3 ± 0.9 days (range 34-87) in the non-drug use compared to 65.5 ± 2.1 day","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S55-S56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MSOR12 Presentation Time: 5:55 PM MSOR12 演讲时间:下午 5:55
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.046
Felipe Castro Canovas MD, DRCPSC, Carlos Herrera Castillo MSc, Eduardo Carrasco Solis MSc, Yesenia Miranda Tunque MD, Luis Gamarra Delgado MD, Indranit Revilla Coz MD, Gustavo Lasteros Ayma MD, Juan Manuel Trejo Mena MD, Herbert Cardenas Del Carpio MD, Paola Fuentes-Rivera Carmelo MD, Alberto Lachos Davila MD, Adela Heredia Zelaya MD, Karinthia Ballon Cervantes MD

Purpose

This single-institution proof of concept and early experience on an innovative workflow for the creation of custom applicators for high dose rate (HDR) skin brachytherapy and skin bolus in low to middle-income countries, where access to CT simulation or dedicated surface scanners is sparse, we utilized geometry mapping technology found in many readily available smartphones as an alternative to other design methods, reducing the number of CT-simulations needed from two to one, improving access to custom applicators for more patients. We now report our skin brachytherapy early experience.

Materials and Methods

In selected consenting patients with indication for skin brachytherapy or EBRT, a smartphone front camera system (e.g. Apple iPhone X or newer with TrueDepth camera) was used to capture the skin surface with capturing software (Apple iOS - Heges 3D Scanner by Marek Simonik), then exported to a computer-aided design software to blueprint the applicator (Meshmixer and Fusion 360 Autodesk on Apple MacOS or Microsoft Windows). The applicator was then 3D printed in-house using a fused deposition modeling printer (Flashforge Adventure 3) with polylactic Acid (PLA) material. The applicator completed a quality assurance examination and then fitted to the patient for a single CT simulation for planning (SagiPlan®), quality assurance and treatment delivery with a Cobalt - 60 after loader (SagiNova®). Follow-up was conducted per standard institutional protocol, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE) was used to report toxicities.

Results

From July 2023 to January 2024, 05 patients were scanned, 4 patients received a 3D printed custom bolus for EBRT, and 1 patient received a custom HDR skin brachytherapy custom applicator, the one patient treated with HDR brachytherapy is reported, had basal cell carcinoma of the nose, the prescription dose was 40Gy in 10 fractions delivered daily, 100% isodose line encapsulated the PTV, limiting surface dose <150%. Acute grade 1 skin toxicity was observed at the end of treatment, it completely resolved at 3 months. No late toxicity or recurrence was observed at 6 months.

Conclusions

This small, early-reported experience with a novel workflow seems faceable and safe, potentially allowing less congestion at the CT Sim, improving access for more patients in low to middle-income countries to custom 3D printed accessories. A larger number of patients and longer follow-ups are needed, report on 3D EBRT bolus results to follow.
目的在中低收入国家,CT 模拟或专用表面扫描仪非常稀缺,我们利用许多现成的智能手机中的几何图形映射技术替代其他设计方法,将所需的 CT 模拟次数从两次减少到一次,让更多患者获得了定制涂抹器。材料与方法在选定的有皮肤近距离放射治疗或 EBRT 适应症的同意患者中,使用智能手机前置摄像头系统(如配备 TrueDepth 摄像头的苹果 iPhone X 或更新机型),通过捕捉软件(苹果 iOS - Marek Simonik 的 Heges 3D 扫描仪)捕捉皮肤表面,然后导出到计算机辅助设计软件,绘制涂抹器蓝图(苹果 MacOS 或微软 Windows 上的 Meshmixer 和 Fusion 360 Autodesk)。然后使用内部的熔融沉积建模打印机(Flashforge Adventure 3)和聚乳酸(PLA)材料对涂抹器进行三维打印。敷贴器完成了质量保证检查,然后安装到患者身上,进行单次 CT 模拟规划 (SagiPlan®)、质量保证和使用 Cobalt - 60 后装载器 (SagiNova®) 进行治疗。按照标准机构协议进行随访,并使用《不良事件通用术语标准 5.0 版》(CTCAE)报告毒性。结果从2023年7月到2024年1月,共扫描了05名患者,4名患者接受了3D打印定制的EBRT栓剂,1名患者接受了定制的HDR皮肤近距离放射治疗定制涂抹器,报告的1名接受HDR近距离放射治疗的患者患有鼻基底细胞癌,处方剂量为40Gy,每天分10次给药,100%等剂量线包裹PTV,限制表面剂量<150%。治疗结束时出现急性 1 级皮肤毒性,3 个月后完全消退。结论这种新型工作流程的早期小规模经验似乎是可面对的、安全的,有可能减少 CT Sim 的拥堵,让更多中低收入国家的患者获得定制的 3D 打印配件。还需要更多患者和更长时间的随访,有关 3D EBRT 栓剂结果的报告将在随后公布。
{"title":"MSOR12 Presentation Time: 5:55 PM","authors":"Felipe Castro Canovas MD, DRCPSC,&nbsp;Carlos Herrera Castillo MSc,&nbsp;Eduardo Carrasco Solis MSc,&nbsp;Yesenia Miranda Tunque MD,&nbsp;Luis Gamarra Delgado MD,&nbsp;Indranit Revilla Coz MD,&nbsp;Gustavo Lasteros Ayma MD,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Trejo Mena MD,&nbsp;Herbert Cardenas Del Carpio MD,&nbsp;Paola Fuentes-Rivera Carmelo MD,&nbsp;Alberto Lachos Davila MD,&nbsp;Adela Heredia Zelaya MD,&nbsp;Karinthia Ballon Cervantes MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.046","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.046","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This single-institution proof of concept and early experience on an innovative workflow for the creation of custom applicators for high dose rate (HDR) skin brachytherapy and skin bolus in low to middle-income countries, where access to CT simulation or dedicated surface scanners is sparse, we utilized geometry mapping technology found in many readily available smartphones as an alternative to other design methods, reducing the number of CT-simulations needed from two to one, improving access to custom applicators for more patients. We now report our skin brachytherapy early experience.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In selected consenting patients with indication for skin brachytherapy or EBRT, a smartphone front camera system (e.g. Apple iPhone X or newer with TrueDepth camera) was used to capture the skin surface with capturing software (Apple iOS - Heges 3D Scanner by Marek Simonik), then exported to a computer-aided design software to blueprint the applicator (Meshmixer and Fusion 360 Autodesk on Apple MacOS or Microsoft Windows). The applicator was then 3D printed in-house using a fused deposition modeling printer (Flashforge Adventure 3) with polylactic Acid (PLA) material. The applicator completed a quality assurance examination and then fitted to the patient for a single CT simulation for planning (SagiPlan®), quality assurance and treatment delivery with a Cobalt - 60 after loader (SagiNova®). Follow-up was conducted per standard institutional protocol, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE) was used to report toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From July 2023 to January 2024, 05 patients were scanned, 4 patients received a 3D printed custom bolus for EBRT, and 1 patient received a custom HDR skin brachytherapy custom applicator, the one patient treated with HDR brachytherapy is reported, had basal cell carcinoma of the nose, the prescription dose was 40Gy in 10 fractions delivered daily, 100% isodose line encapsulated the PTV, limiting surface dose &lt;150%. Acute grade 1 skin toxicity was observed at the end of treatment, it completely resolved at 3 months. No late toxicity or recurrence was observed at 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This small, early-reported experience with a novel workflow seems faceable and safe, potentially allowing less congestion at the CT Sim, improving access for more patients in low to middle-income countries to custom 3D printed accessories. A larger number of patients and longer follow-ups are needed, report on 3D EBRT bolus results to follow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MPP03 Presentation Time: 4:18 PM MPP03 演讲时间:下午 4:18
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.017
Tamer Soror MD, PhD , Pierre-Alexander Justenhoven MD , Anke Leichtle MD, PhD , Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage MD, PhD , György Kovács MD, PhD , Dirk Rades MD, PhD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Periorificial facial cancer (PFC), characterized by cancer originating from the eyelids, nasal vestibule, lips, and ear lobules, exhibits significantly high global incidence rates. Radical surgery have both functional and aesthetic complications. This retrospective analysis explores the effectiveness of high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT, brachytherapy) combined with organ-preserving surgery for managing PFC.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective assessment of patients with PFC and treated with HDR-IRT at our center between 2008 and 2022. Patients underwent a physical examination, tumor biopsy, and head-and-neck CT and/or MRI for locoregional staging. The decision of organ-preserving surgery with HDR-IRT was made by a specialized multidisciplinary tumor board. Organ-preserving surgery ranged from tumor debulking to complete local resection. HDR-IRT catheters were immediately implanted in the operating room, in a parallel arrangement with 8-12 mm spacing. The clinical target volume included the estimated tumor volume and a safety margin (5-15 mm) based on anatomical considerations and nearby critical structures. The prescribed radiation dose was administered twice daily with a minimum six-hour gap between fractions. The median HDR-IRT dose was 40Gy (30-50), the median fraction dose was 4Gy (2.5-5), and the median number of fractions was 10 (8-16). Treatment-related toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 123 patients were identified, with primary sites as follows: 24 (19.5%) eyelids, 58 (47.2%) nasal vestibule, 25 (20.3%) lips, and 16 (13%) ear lobules. The median age was 76 years (37-99), with 60.2% (74/123) males and 39.2% (49/123) females. Sixty-four percent (64.2%) had primary tumors, and 35.8% had recurrent tumors. Among patients with recurrent tumors, 40 had previous surgery, and four were primarily treated with EBRT. Debulking surgery was performed in 16 patients (13%), and neck dissection in 14 patients (11.4%). Among 107 patients undergoing local resection, eight had close surgical margins, 40 had positive margins, and four had macroscopic residuals. T-status included T1 (53.7%), T2 (28.5%), T3 (10.5%), and T4 (7.3%). Six patients had positive neck lymph nodes. Squamous cell carcinoma constituted 61.8%, basal cell carcinoma 30.9%, and other histologies 7.3%. The median follow-up time was 38 months (4-147). During follow-up, 15 local recurrences (12.2%) were documented, with a median time to recurrence of 13 months (5-71). Local recurrence rates by tumor site were as follows: Nose 10/58 (17.2%), eyelid 3/24 (12.5%), lip 1/25 (4%), and ear lobule 1/16 (6.3%). The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 85.3%, with 10-year and 12-year LC rates of 80.8%. Five-year, 10-year, and 12-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 87.8%. Five-year distant
目的 人工面部癌(PFC)是指起源于眼睑、鼻前庭、嘴唇和耳小叶的癌症,在全球的发病率非常高。根治性手术具有功能性和美观性并发症。本回顾性分析探讨了高剂量率介入放射治疗(HDR-IRT,近距离放射治疗)联合保留器官手术治疗 PFC 的有效性。患者接受了体格检查、肿瘤活检、头颈部 CT 和/或 MRI 进行局部分期。HDR-IRT保留器官手术由专门的多学科肿瘤委员会决定。保器官手术的范围包括肿瘤剥除术和完全局部切除术。HDR-IRT导管在手术室立即植入,平行排列,间距为8-12毫米。临床目标体积包括估计的肿瘤体积以及基于解剖学考虑和附近重要结构的安全系数(5-15 毫米)。规定的放射剂量每天照射两次,两次照射之间至少间隔六小时。HDR-IRT 的中位剂量为 40Gy(30-50),中位分割剂量为 4Gy(2.5-5),中位分割次数为 10 次(8-16)。治疗相关毒性根据《不良事件通用术语标准》(CTCAE)5.0 版进行评估:眼睑 24 例(19.5%)、鼻前庭 58 例(47.2%)、嘴唇 25 例(20.3%)、耳垂 16 例(13%)。年龄中位数为 76 岁(37-99 岁),男性占 60.2%(74/123),女性占 39.2%(49/123)。64%(64.2%)为原发性肿瘤,35.8%为复发性肿瘤。在复发肿瘤患者中,40人曾接受过手术,4人主要接受了EBRT治疗。16名患者(13%)接受了切除手术,14名患者(11.4%)接受了颈部切除术。在接受局部切除术的107名患者中,8人手术切缘接近,40人切缘阳性,4人有大体残留。T状态包括T1(53.7%)、T2(28.5%)、T3(10.5%)和T4(7.3%)。六名患者的颈部淋巴结呈阳性。鳞状细胞癌占61.8%,基底细胞癌占30.9%,其他组织类型占7.3%。中位随访时间为38个月(4-147)。在随访期间,共记录到 15 例局部复发(12.2%),中位复发时间为 13 个月(5-71)。各肿瘤部位的局部复发率如下鼻10/58(17.2%),眼睑3/24(12.5%),唇1/25(4%),耳小叶1/16(6.3%)。5年局部控制率为85.3%,10年和12年局部控制率为80.8%。5年、10年和12年无病生存率(DFS)均为87.8%。5年无远处转移生存率为94.7%,10年和12年无远处转移生存率为93.1%。总生存期(OS)方面,5年OS为88.4%,10年和12年OS为66.2%。与治疗相关的急性和慢性毒性一般较轻,大多为1/2级。72名患者共发生了112起急性毒性事件,其中只有4起为3级。结论HDR-IRT联合保留器官手术似乎是治疗PFC的有效方法,显示出良好的长期疾病控制和患者生存率。前瞻性研究对于验证和进一步研究这种治疗方法在特定亚人群中的作用至关重要。
{"title":"MPP03 Presentation Time: 4:18 PM","authors":"Tamer Soror MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pierre-Alexander Justenhoven MD ,&nbsp;Anke Leichtle MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage MD, PhD ,&nbsp;György Kovács MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Dirk Rades MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.017","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Periorificial facial cancer (PFC), characterized by cancer originating from the eyelids, nasal vestibule, lips, and ear lobules, exhibits significantly high global incidence rates. Radical surgery have both functional and aesthetic complications. This retrospective analysis explores the effectiveness of high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT, brachytherapy) combined with organ-preserving surgery for managing PFC.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Material and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We conducted a retrospective assessment of patients with PFC and treated with HDR-IRT at our center between 2008 and 2022. Patients underwent a physical examination, tumor biopsy, and head-and-neck CT and/or MRI for locoregional staging. The decision of organ-preserving surgery with HDR-IRT was made by a specialized multidisciplinary tumor board. Organ-preserving surgery ranged from tumor debulking to complete local resection. HDR-IRT catheters were immediately implanted in the operating room, in a parallel arrangement with 8-12 mm spacing. The clinical target volume included the estimated tumor volume and a safety margin (5-15 mm) based on anatomical considerations and nearby critical structures. The prescribed radiation dose was administered twice daily with a minimum six-hour gap between fractions. The median HDR-IRT dose was 40Gy (30-50), the median fraction dose was 4Gy (2.5-5), and the median number of fractions was 10 (8-16). Treatment-related toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A total of 123 patients were identified, with primary sites as follows: 24 (19.5%) eyelids, 58 (47.2%) nasal vestibule, 25 (20.3%) lips, and 16 (13%) ear lobules. The median age was 76 years (37-99), with 60.2% (74/123) males and 39.2% (49/123) females. Sixty-four percent (64.2%) had primary tumors, and 35.8% had recurrent tumors. Among patients with recurrent tumors, 40 had previous surgery, and four were primarily treated with EBRT. Debulking surgery was performed in 16 patients (13%), and neck dissection in 14 patients (11.4%). Among 107 patients undergoing local resection, eight had close surgical margins, 40 had positive margins, and four had macroscopic residuals. T-status included T1 (53.7%), T2 (28.5%), T3 (10.5%), and T4 (7.3%). Six patients had positive neck lymph nodes. Squamous cell carcinoma constituted 61.8%, basal cell carcinoma 30.9%, and other histologies 7.3%. The median follow-up time was 38 months (4-147). During follow-up, 15 local recurrences (12.2%) were documented, with a median time to recurrence of 13 months (5-71). Local recurrence rates by tumor site were as follows: Nose 10/58 (17.2%), eyelid 3/24 (12.5%), lip 1/25 (4%), and ear lobule 1/16 (6.3%). The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 85.3%, with 10-year and 12-year LC rates of 80.8%. Five-year, 10-year, and 12-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 87.8%. Five-year distant ","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S24-S25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
GPP06 Presentation Time: 9:45 AM GPP06 演讲时间:上午 9:45
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.008
Raviteja Miriyala M.D , KK Sreelakshmi M.Sc.,D.R.P , Kiriti Chiriki D.N.B , Raghavendra Hajare M.Sc., D.R.P , Rohit Vadgaonkar M.D , Sneha Nachu B.D.S , Surbhi Grover M.D , Umesh Mahantshetty M.D, D.N.B
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Consensus recommendations for CT based contouring in Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy (CT-IGABT) for cervical cancer were published by IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS. However, real world outcome data of patients treated based on these recommendations is sparse. The purpose of this study is to present early outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with CT-IGABT using the IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>Retro-LACER is a mono-institutional database of cervical cancer patients treated with CT-IGABT using uniform target delineation protocols between August 2020 and July 2023. All consecutive patients with biopsy proven locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO Stage IB3 to IVA) who received curative (chemo) radiation at our institution were screened. While the dosimetric details were maintained prospectively, outcome and treatment related morbidity data is collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 318 patients screened, 73 were excluded as per the eligibility criteria (2, stage ≤ IB2; 3 stage IVB; 19, received EBRT elsewhere; 17 defaulted / received BT elsewhere; 21, participants in other interventional studies; 11, did not come for at least one post treatment follow up). Disease and treatment characteristics of the 245 patients included in this analysis are presented in Table 1. Hybrid IC+IS BT was used in 51.4% of patients. About 64.5% of patients were treated in a basic CT environment (CT alone at BT), while 35.5% were treated in an advanced CT environment (pre-BT MRI, in 3.6% and Trans-Rectal ultrasonography in 31.8%). Median volume of CTV_HR was 31cc, while median D90 and D98 to CTV_HR (in EQD2<sub>10Gy</sub>) were 88 and 79, respectively. Median D2cc for bladder, rectum and sigmoid (in EQD2<sub>3Gy</sub>) were 89, 68 and 67, respectively. Dosimetric details of patients treated in basic and advanced CT environments are also presented in Table 1. At a median follow up of 17 months (IQR, 9 to 26), 12 patients (4.9%) died due to disease and 3 (1.2%) were lost to follow up. Treatment failure was observed in 27 patients (11%), with isolated local, regional (pelvic), regional (para-aortic), regional (pelvic + para-aortic) and distant failures in 3 (1.2%), 0 (0%), 5 (2%), 1 (0.4 %) and 12 (5.2%) respectively. Combination of [local + regional], [regional + distant] and [local + regional + distant] failures was observed in 2 (0.8%), 3 (1.2%) and 1 (0.4%) respectively. Estimated survival probability (Kaplan-Meier) at 6 months and 1 year were 99.5% and 93% for local control, 99.1% and 92% for loco-regional relapse free survival and 100% and 95% for overall survival, respectively. Severe late GI and GU morbidity (CTCAEv5 ≥ Grade 3) was observed in 18 (7.3%) and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Among the patients who developed severe late GU and GI morbidity, median D2cc doses to bladder, rectum and sigmoid (in EQD2<sub>3Gy</sub>) were
目的 IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS 公布了基于 CT 的宫颈癌图像引导自适应近距离治疗(CT-IGABT)轮廓治疗的共识建议。然而,根据这些建议进行治疗的患者的实际疗效数据却很少。材料与方法Retro-LACER是一个单机构数据库,收录了2020年8月至2023年7月期间使用统一靶点划定方案接受CT-IGABT治疗的宫颈癌患者。所有在我院接受过根治性(化疗)放射治疗的活检证实局部晚期宫颈癌(FIGO IB3 至 IVA 期)连续患者均在筛选之列。结果在318名接受筛查的患者中,有73人根据资格标准被排除在外(2人分期≤IB2;3人分期IVB;19人在其他地方接受过EBRT;17人违约/在其他地方接受过BT;21人参与了其他介入研究;11人未接受至少一次治疗后随访)。表 1 列出了纳入本次分析的 245 名患者的疾病和治疗特征。51.4%的患者使用了混合 IC+IS BT。约 64.5% 的患者在基本 CT 环境中接受治疗(BT 时仅使用 CT),35.5% 的患者在高级 CT 环境中接受治疗(3.6% 的患者在 BT 前使用 MRI,31.8% 的患者使用经直肠超声波检查)。CTV_HR的中位体积为31cc,而CTV_HR的中位D90和D98(以EQD210Gy为单位)分别为88和79。膀胱、直肠和乙状结肠的 D2cc 中位数(以 EQD23Gy 计)分别为 89、68 和 67。表 1 还列出了在基本和高级 CT 环境中接受治疗的患者的剂量详情。中位随访时间为 17 个月(IQR,9 至 26 个月),12 名患者(4.9%)因病死亡,3 名患者(1.2%)失去随访机会。27名患者(11%)出现治疗失败,分别有3人(1.2%)、0人(0%)、5人(2%)、1人(0.4%)和12人(5.2%)出现局部、区域(盆腔)、区域(主动脉旁)、区域(盆腔+主动脉旁)和远处治疗失败。合并[局部+区域]、[区域+远处]和[局部+区域+远处]失败的患者分别有2例(0.8%)、3例(1.2%)和1例(0.4%)。6个月和1年的估计生存概率(Kaplan-Meier)分别为:局部控制率99.5%和93%,无局部区域复发生存率99.1%和92%,总生存率100%和95%。晚期消化道和胃肠道严重发病率(CTCAEv5≥3级)分别为18例(7.3%)和1例(0.4%)。结论采用IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS建议进行基于CT的IGABT治疗的早期临床结果似乎令人鼓舞且可以接受。为了解长期疗效,有必要对该组患者进行进一步随访。
{"title":"GPP06 Presentation Time: 9:45 AM","authors":"Raviteja Miriyala M.D ,&nbsp;KK Sreelakshmi M.Sc.,D.R.P ,&nbsp;Kiriti Chiriki D.N.B ,&nbsp;Raghavendra Hajare M.Sc., D.R.P ,&nbsp;Rohit Vadgaonkar M.D ,&nbsp;Sneha Nachu B.D.S ,&nbsp;Surbhi Grover M.D ,&nbsp;Umesh Mahantshetty M.D, D.N.B","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Consensus recommendations for CT based contouring in Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy (CT-IGABT) for cervical cancer were published by IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS. However, real world outcome data of patients treated based on these recommendations is sparse. The purpose of this study is to present early outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with CT-IGABT using the IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS recommendations.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Material and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Retro-LACER is a mono-institutional database of cervical cancer patients treated with CT-IGABT using uniform target delineation protocols between August 2020 and July 2023. All consecutive patients with biopsy proven locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO Stage IB3 to IVA) who received curative (chemo) radiation at our institution were screened. While the dosimetric details were maintained prospectively, outcome and treatment related morbidity data is collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Out of 318 patients screened, 73 were excluded as per the eligibility criteria (2, stage ≤ IB2; 3 stage IVB; 19, received EBRT elsewhere; 17 defaulted / received BT elsewhere; 21, participants in other interventional studies; 11, did not come for at least one post treatment follow up). Disease and treatment characteristics of the 245 patients included in this analysis are presented in Table 1. Hybrid IC+IS BT was used in 51.4% of patients. About 64.5% of patients were treated in a basic CT environment (CT alone at BT), while 35.5% were treated in an advanced CT environment (pre-BT MRI, in 3.6% and Trans-Rectal ultrasonography in 31.8%). Median volume of CTV_HR was 31cc, while median D90 and D98 to CTV_HR (in EQD2&lt;sub&gt;10Gy&lt;/sub&gt;) were 88 and 79, respectively. Median D2cc for bladder, rectum and sigmoid (in EQD2&lt;sub&gt;3Gy&lt;/sub&gt;) were 89, 68 and 67, respectively. Dosimetric details of patients treated in basic and advanced CT environments are also presented in Table 1. At a median follow up of 17 months (IQR, 9 to 26), 12 patients (4.9%) died due to disease and 3 (1.2%) were lost to follow up. Treatment failure was observed in 27 patients (11%), with isolated local, regional (pelvic), regional (para-aortic), regional (pelvic + para-aortic) and distant failures in 3 (1.2%), 0 (0%), 5 (2%), 1 (0.4 %) and 12 (5.2%) respectively. Combination of [local + regional], [regional + distant] and [local + regional + distant] failures was observed in 2 (0.8%), 3 (1.2%) and 1 (0.4%) respectively. Estimated survival probability (Kaplan-Meier) at 6 months and 1 year were 99.5% and 93% for local control, 99.1% and 92% for loco-regional relapse free survival and 100% and 95% for overall survival, respectively. Severe late GI and GU morbidity (CTCAEv5 ≥ Grade 3) was observed in 18 (7.3%) and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Among the patients who developed severe late GU and GI morbidity, median D2cc doses to bladder, rectum and sigmoid (in EQD2&lt;sub&gt;3Gy&lt;/sub&gt;) were","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Page S19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PHSOR11 Presentation Time: 9:50 AM PHSOR11 演讲时间:上午 9:50
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.085
Juanjuan Fu MS, Zhaobin Li MS, Zhen Li MS, Jie Fu MD

Purpose

This study focuses on determining the optimal MRI scanning parameters for precise localization of MR-line markers, and to investigate their apical reconstruction error.

Materials and Methods

In the study, it was assumed that the front seal of each MR-line marker was identical. Three MR-line markers were individually placed at the tips inside the tubes of plastic sharp needles. The position of the plastic-tipped sharp needles was marked with three additional MR-line markers. These needles, along with the markers, were then fixed into the same L-shaped (rectangular) mold to ensure that the plastic sharp needles and their corresponding MR-line markers maintained a stable, horizontal alignment and were immobilized during the process. The physical distance measured between the tips of the two MR line markers, one located inside and the other outside the plastic sharp needle, was approximately 2.30mm. To evaluate the apical reconstruction error of the MR-line marker,10 sets of MR images were acquired with varying slice thicknesses, including T1-weighted images with thicknesses of 3 mm, 2 mm, and 1.4 mm, and T2 -weighted images with thicknesses of 3 mm, 2 mm, and 1 mm.

Results

The analysis of the image distance between the MR-line marker tips, both inside and outside plastic sharp needle, revealed that the probability of the measurement of the MR-line marker being within 1 mm accuracy was 92.59%. It was observed that the thickness of the MR images positively correlated with both the mean and standard deviation of the image measurement value in T1-weighted scans. Additionally, the standard deviation of MR-line marker image measurements in T2-weighted scans showed a slight increase as the layer thickness was reduced to 2mm. Upon comparing the results from the three sets of MR-line marker image measurements, it was found that the overall results of T2-weighted scans at 3 mm and T1-weighted scans at 1.4 mm were similar. However, it is important to note that the thinner slice parameter not only restricts the length of the scan, but also leads to increased scanning time and additional time required for contouring before brachytherapy treatment, resulting in increased discomfort for the patient. Therefore, a scanning parameter of T2-weighted scans at 3 mm is recommended for the reconstruction of the MR-line marker.

Conclusions

The study demonstrated that the MR-line marker possesses significant potential for clinical application, particularly in the precise localization of plastic sharp needles. This finding is pivotal as it provides a crucial experimental foundation for the implementation of an MR-only workflow in interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.
目的 本研究的重点是确定 MR 线标记精确定位的最佳 MRI 扫描参数,并研究其顶端重建误差。三个 MR 线标记分别置于塑料尖针管内的顶端。塑料尖头锐针的位置用另外三个 MR 线标记物标记。然后将这些针和标记固定在同一个 L 形(矩形)模具中,以确保塑料尖针及其相应的 MR 线标记在加工过程中保持稳定的水平排列和固定。两个 MR 线标记的尖端(一个位于塑料尖针内部,另一个位于塑料尖针外部)之间的物理距离约为 2.30 毫米。为了评估 MR 线标记的顶端重建误差,采集了 10 组不同切片厚度的 MR 图像,包括厚度分别为 3 毫米、2 毫米和 1.4 毫米的 T1 加权图像,以及厚度分别为 3 毫米、2 毫米和 1 毫米的 T2 加权图像。据观察,MR 图像的厚度与 T1 加权扫描图像测量值的平均值和标准偏差均呈正相关。此外,T2 加权扫描中 MR 线标记图像测量值的标准偏差随着层厚减至 2 毫米而略有增加。比较三组 MR 线标记图像测量结果后发现,3 毫米的 T2 加权扫描和 1.4 毫米的 T1 加权扫描的总体结果相似。不过,值得注意的是,较薄的切片参数不仅限制了扫描长度,还导致扫描时间增加,近距离治疗前的轮廓绘制也需要更多时间,从而增加了患者的不适感。因此,建议在重建磁共振线标记时使用 3 毫米的 T2 加权扫描参数。这一发现至关重要,因为它为在妇科间质近距离治疗中实施纯磁共振工作流程奠定了重要的实验基础。
{"title":"PHSOR11 Presentation Time: 9:50 AM","authors":"Juanjuan Fu MS,&nbsp;Zhaobin Li MS,&nbsp;Zhen Li MS,&nbsp;Jie Fu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.085","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.085","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study focuses on determining the optimal MRI scanning parameters for precise localization of MR-line markers, and to investigate their apical reconstruction error.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In the study, it was assumed that the front seal of each MR-line marker was identical. Three MR-line markers were individually placed at the tips inside the tubes of plastic sharp needles. The position of the plastic-tipped sharp needles was marked with three additional MR-line markers. These needles, along with the markers, were then fixed into the same L-shaped (rectangular) mold to ensure that the plastic sharp needles and their corresponding MR-line markers maintained a stable, horizontal alignment and were immobilized during the process. The physical distance measured between the tips of the two MR line markers, one located inside and the other outside the plastic sharp needle, was approximately 2.30mm. To evaluate the apical reconstruction error of the MR-line marker,10 sets of MR images were acquired with varying slice thicknesses, including T1-weighted images with thicknesses of 3 mm, 2 mm, and 1.4 mm, and T2 -weighted images with thicknesses of 3 mm, 2 mm, and 1 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis of the image distance between the MR-line marker tips, both inside and outside plastic sharp needle, revealed that the probability of the measurement of the MR-line marker being within 1 mm accuracy was 92.59%. It was observed that the thickness of the MR images positively correlated with both the mean and standard deviation of the image measurement value in T1-weighted scans. Additionally, the standard deviation of MR-line marker image measurements in T2-weighted scans showed a slight increase as the layer thickness was reduced to 2mm. Upon comparing the results from the three sets of MR-line marker image measurements, it was found that the overall results of T2-weighted scans at 3 mm and T1-weighted scans at 1.4 mm were similar. However, it is important to note that the thinner slice parameter not only restricts the length of the scan, but also leads to increased scanning time and additional time required for contouring before brachytherapy treatment, resulting in increased discomfort for the patient. Therefore, a scanning parameter of T2-weighted scans at 3 mm is recommended for the reconstruction of the MR-line marker.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study demonstrated that the MR-line marker possesses significant potential for clinical application, particularly in the precise localization of plastic sharp needles. This finding is pivotal as it provides a crucial experimental foundation for the implementation of an MR-only workflow in interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S63-S64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thursday, July 11, 20245:00 PM - 6:00 PM GSOR01 Presentation Time: 5:00 PM 2024 年 7 月 11 日星期四下午 5:00 - 6:00 GSOR01 演讲时间:下午 5:00
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.047
Dulce M. Barrios MD , Mitchell Kamrava MD , Jenna M. Kahn MD , Vonetta M. Williams MD , Keyur J. Mehta MD , Aaron Wolfson MD , Lorraine Portelance MD , Amanda Rivera MD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine the current practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) use across the U.S. for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A 27-item survey was created with expertise from five practicing radiation oncology brachytherapists in the U.S. and distributed electronically to 90 Radiation Oncology residency programs for dissemination. The survey was also publicized on social media via the X (formally Twitter) platform, and at two national meetings (The American Brachytherapy Society Annual Meeting 2023 and The American Society for Radiation Therapy Annual Meeting 2023) during the months of June-October 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-one responses were received (46% response rate). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% Caucasian race and 85% of non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Ninety-three percent were physician brachytherapists, 5% medical physicists, and 2% did not disclose their profession. Forty nine percent reported typically carrying out procedures in a BT suite ± separate CT simulator alone, 39% in the operating room ± BT suite or CT simulator or other location. Ten percent reported the CT simulation room alone, and 2% in a clinic exam room. The number of cervix BT courses most frequently performed per month was between 0 and 5 at 61%, and 44% reported an average of five applicator placements per course (range 0-5). Thirty four percent reported using general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n=41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, and 9% spinal or epidural AS alone. The remaining responses were combinations of AG or AS (see table 1). Hybrid intracavitary/interstitial BT applicators are being used by 61% of respondents, 49% of which are vendor made devices (e.g., Elekta/Varian). Among those performing hybrid BT (n=25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, and 4% OA alone. The remaining responses were combinations of AG or AS. For template interstitial BT (n=25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of all respondents report providing AG or AS during applicator placement only, while 32% report offering it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most commonly cited reason for not using CS or GA was lack of anesthesia resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to help alleviate emotional distress related to BT procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AG/AS practice patterns for gynecologic BT vary widely across the United States. While many clinicians report using some form of GA, CS or epidural AS, 10% are using only oral analgesia methods, and 22% are offering AG/AS only during applicator placement.
目的 确定美国各地妇科近距离放射治疗(BT)过程中使用镇痛(AG)和麻醉(AS)的当前实践模式。方法和材料 利用美国五位执业放射肿瘤近距离放射治疗师的专业知识制作了一份包含 27 个项目的调查表,并以电子版形式分发给 90 个放射肿瘤学住院医师培训项目进行传播。该调查还通过 X(正式名称为 Twitter)平台在社交媒体上进行了宣传,并在 2023 年 6 月至 10 月期间的两次全国性会议(美国近距离放射治疗学会 2023 年年会和美国放射治疗学会 2023 年年会)上进行了宣传。54%为女性,66%为白种人,85%为非西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔。93%的受访者为手足病治疗师,5%为医学物理学家,2%未透露其职业。有 49% 的人称他们通常在 BT 套间和单独的 CT 模拟器上进行手术,39% 的人称他们在手术室和 BT 套间或 CT 模拟器或其他地方进行手术。10%的人称仅在 CT 模拟室,2%的人称在诊所检查室。每月最常进行的宫颈 BT 治疗次数在 0 到 5 次之间的占 61%,44% 的人表示平均每次治疗放置 5 个涂抹器(0-5 次不等)。34%的人报告在腔内 BT 时仅使用全身麻醉(GA)(n=41),20%的人仅使用意识镇静(CS),10%的人仅使用口服镇痛(OA),9%的人仅使用脊髓或硬膜外 AS。其余反应为 AG 或 AS 组合(见表 1)。61%的受访者正在使用混合腔内/间质 BT 应用器,其中 49% 是供应商生产的设备(如 Elekta/Varian)。在进行混合 BT 的受访者中(n=25),40% 单独使用 GA,16% 单独使用 CS,12% 单独使用硬膜外或脊柱 AS,4% 单独使用 OA。其余为 AG 或 AS 组合。对于模板间隙 BT(n=25),44% 的受访者单独使用 GA,48% 单独使用硬膜外或与其他 AS 结合使用,8% 单独使用 CS。在所有受访者中,22% 的人表示仅在放置涂抹器时提供 AG 或 AS,32% 的人表示在放置、计划、治疗和移除过程中提供 AG 或 AS。不使用 CS 或 GA 的最常见原因是缺乏麻醉资源和临床医生的偏好。73%的人认为患者在 BT 后会出现创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 症状。结论AG/AS 在妇科 BT 方面的实践模式在美国差异很大。虽然许多临床医生表示使用了某种形式的 GA、CS 或硬膜外 AS,但有 10% 的医生仅使用口服镇痛方法,22% 的医生仅在放置涂药器时提供 AG/AS。此外,73% 的受访者认为患者在 BT 后会出现创伤后应激障碍症状,但只有 32% 的受访者表示使用了一些技术来帮助缓解这种症状。AS 资源和临床医生的偏好是扩大高质量护理的目标领域。
{"title":"Thursday, July 11, 20245:00 PM - 6:00 PM GSOR01 Presentation Time: 5:00 PM","authors":"Dulce M. Barrios MD ,&nbsp;Mitchell Kamrava MD ,&nbsp;Jenna M. Kahn MD ,&nbsp;Vonetta M. Williams MD ,&nbsp;Keyur J. Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Aaron Wolfson MD ,&nbsp;Lorraine Portelance MD ,&nbsp;Amanda Rivera MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.047","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.047","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;To determine the current practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) use across the U.S. for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods and Materials&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A 27-item survey was created with expertise from five practicing radiation oncology brachytherapists in the U.S. and distributed electronically to 90 Radiation Oncology residency programs for dissemination. The survey was also publicized on social media via the X (formally Twitter) platform, and at two national meetings (The American Brachytherapy Society Annual Meeting 2023 and The American Society for Radiation Therapy Annual Meeting 2023) during the months of June-October 2023.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Forty-one responses were received (46% response rate). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% Caucasian race and 85% of non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Ninety-three percent were physician brachytherapists, 5% medical physicists, and 2% did not disclose their profession. Forty nine percent reported typically carrying out procedures in a BT suite ± separate CT simulator alone, 39% in the operating room ± BT suite or CT simulator or other location. Ten percent reported the CT simulation room alone, and 2% in a clinic exam room. The number of cervix BT courses most frequently performed per month was between 0 and 5 at 61%, and 44% reported an average of five applicator placements per course (range 0-5). Thirty four percent reported using general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n=41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, and 9% spinal or epidural AS alone. The remaining responses were combinations of AG or AS (see table 1). Hybrid intracavitary/interstitial BT applicators are being used by 61% of respondents, 49% of which are vendor made devices (e.g., Elekta/Varian). Among those performing hybrid BT (n=25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, and 4% OA alone. The remaining responses were combinations of AG or AS. For template interstitial BT (n=25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of all respondents report providing AG or AS during applicator placement only, while 32% report offering it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most commonly cited reason for not using CS or GA was lack of anesthesia resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to help alleviate emotional distress related to BT procedures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;AG/AS practice patterns for gynecologic BT vary widely across the United States. While many clinicians report using some form of GA, CS or epidural AS, 10% are using only oral analgesia methods, and 22% are offering AG/AS only during applicator placement. ","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S41-S42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142526541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PHSOR06 Presentation Time: 9:25 AM PHSOR06 演讲时间:上午 9:25
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.080
Sharbacha Edward PhD in Medical Physics, Justin Mikell PhD, Jose Garcia-Ramirez MS, Michael B. Altman PhD, Phillip D. Wall PhD, Anamaria Guta MS, Jason LaBrash BS, Jessika A. Contreras MD, Jacqueline E. Zoberi PhD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Two high dose rate (HDR) remote afterloaders (RALs) were recently accepted and commissioned for use in our clinic. These RALs are unique in that prior to treatment, they measure each connected applicator + transfer guide tube (TGT) channel length with the dummy wire. If this measurement deviation is within some user-specified tolerance, the RAL automatically adjusts the planned channel length (and subsequent dwell positions) used for treatment by the active wire. This work evaluates the positional accuracy of these units and reports their performance over the first few months of gynecologic patient treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Acceptance testing and commissioning were performed for both units: RAL1 in August 2023, and RAL2 in November 2023. Applicator + TGT channel length verification tests were performed as part of this process. Channel lengths were measured with two independent ruler systems provided by the manufacturer. Manually measured channel lengths were within 0.5 mm of the baseline nominal values provided by the manufacturer. In order to quantify RAL positional accuracy, rigid fixed length applicators - including tandems, ovoids, cylinders, and Simon-Heyman capsules - were affixed to radiochromic film, and double exposure irradiations were performed. First, they were irradiated using a mobile C-Arm fluoroscopy unit. An autoradiograph was then acquired using mock treatment plans designed using nominal channel lengths as the planned lengths, and delivered by the RALs using an ideal applicator setup, i.e. minimizing curvature of TGTs. We configured the RAL to automatically adjust dwell positions when the difference between the RAL-measured and planned channel lengths were within 2 mm. Dwell position deviations measured on film were compared with differences between planned and RAL-measured channel lengths. The record and verify system's treatment summary was queried to extract the RALs’ measured channel lengths. The performance of each RAL was assessed over time by comparing the treatment summary channel lengths for patient treatments with the planned values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Double exposure films indicated that, on average, dwell positions deviated towards the applicator tip by 0.8mm (max=1.5mm). Mean difference between planned and RAL-measured channel lengths was 0.5 mm (max=0.9mm). On both RALs, more curved applicators had larger length deviations during commissioning and patient treatments. This increased curvature resulted in larger overestimates of channel length, up to 1.7mm for ovoids. Ovoid channel length deviations were similar for left and right ovoids on RAL1 at just over 1mm initially, and decreased over a 23 week period to be <1mm. The deviations however remained steady for RAL2 over 10 weeks of treatment, with 90% of all values being >1mm(Fig.1). Left ovoids showed larger deviation than right (1.45 vs 1.18mm respectively) (p<0.01).</div><
目的最近,两台高剂量率(HDR)远程后装载器(RAL)被接受并委托在本诊所使用。这些 RAL 的独特之处在于,在治疗前,它们会用假线测量每个连接的涂抹器+传输导管(TGT)通道的长度。如果测量偏差在用户指定的公差范围内,RAL 就会自动调整有源导线用于治疗的计划通道长度(以及随后的停留位置)。这项工作评估了这些设备的定位精度,并报告了它们在妇科病人治疗的最初几个月中的表现:RAL1 于 2023 年 8 月完成,RAL2 于 2023 年 11 月完成。在此过程中进行了涂抹器 + TGT 通道长度验证测试。通道长度由制造商提供的两个独立尺子系统进行测量。手动测量的通道长度与制造商提供的基准标称值相差 0.5 毫米以内。为了量化 RAL 的定位精度,将固定长度的硬质涂抹器(包括串珠、卵圆形、圆柱形和西蒙-海曼胶囊)贴在放射性变色胶片上,并进行双重曝光辐照。首先,使用移动式 C-Arm 透视装置对它们进行辐照。然后使用模拟治疗方案获取自动放射照片,模拟治疗方案的设计以标称通道长度作为计划长度,并由 RAL 使用理想的涂抹器设置进行涂抹,即最大限度地减少 TGT 的曲率。我们对 RAL 进行了配置,当 RAL 测量的通道长度与计划的通道长度之差在 2 毫米以内时,RAL 会自动调整停留位置。将胶片上测量到的停留位置偏差与计划通道长度和 RAL 测量通道长度之间的差异进行比较。通过查询记录和验证系统的治疗摘要,提取 RAL 的测量通道长度。通过比较患者治疗的治疗摘要通道长度与计划值,评估每个 RAL 的性能。结果双曝光胶片显示,停留位置平均偏离涂抹器尖端 0.8 毫米(最大=1.5 毫米)。计划的通道长度与 RAL 测量的通道长度平均相差 0.5 毫米(最大值=0.9 毫米)。在两种 RAL 上,弧度较大的涂抹器在调试和患者治疗期间的长度偏差较大。弧度增大导致通道长度的高估值增大,椭圆形通道的高估值高达 1.7 毫米。RAL1 的左侧和右侧椭圆形通道长度偏差相似,最初略高于 1 毫米,在 23 周内下降到 1 毫米。然而,RAL2 的偏差在 10 周的治疗中保持稳定,90% 的偏差值为 1 毫米(图 1)。结论两台 HDR RAL 已投入使用,作为设备物理调试测试的一部分,对固有的通道长度验证测量和调整功能进行了测试和验证。一些涂抹器的通道长度偏差高达 1.7 毫米,但随着时间的推移逐渐减小。最弯曲的涂抹器(椭圆形)偏差最大。
{"title":"PHSOR06 Presentation Time: 9:25 AM","authors":"Sharbacha Edward PhD in Medical Physics,&nbsp;Justin Mikell PhD,&nbsp;Jose Garcia-Ramirez MS,&nbsp;Michael B. Altman PhD,&nbsp;Phillip D. Wall PhD,&nbsp;Anamaria Guta MS,&nbsp;Jason LaBrash BS,&nbsp;Jessika A. Contreras MD,&nbsp;Jacqueline E. Zoberi PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.080","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.080","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Two high dose rate (HDR) remote afterloaders (RALs) were recently accepted and commissioned for use in our clinic. These RALs are unique in that prior to treatment, they measure each connected applicator + transfer guide tube (TGT) channel length with the dummy wire. If this measurement deviation is within some user-specified tolerance, the RAL automatically adjusts the planned channel length (and subsequent dwell positions) used for treatment by the active wire. This work evaluates the positional accuracy of these units and reports their performance over the first few months of gynecologic patient treatments.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Acceptance testing and commissioning were performed for both units: RAL1 in August 2023, and RAL2 in November 2023. Applicator + TGT channel length verification tests were performed as part of this process. Channel lengths were measured with two independent ruler systems provided by the manufacturer. Manually measured channel lengths were within 0.5 mm of the baseline nominal values provided by the manufacturer. In order to quantify RAL positional accuracy, rigid fixed length applicators - including tandems, ovoids, cylinders, and Simon-Heyman capsules - were affixed to radiochromic film, and double exposure irradiations were performed. First, they were irradiated using a mobile C-Arm fluoroscopy unit. An autoradiograph was then acquired using mock treatment plans designed using nominal channel lengths as the planned lengths, and delivered by the RALs using an ideal applicator setup, i.e. minimizing curvature of TGTs. We configured the RAL to automatically adjust dwell positions when the difference between the RAL-measured and planned channel lengths were within 2 mm. Dwell position deviations measured on film were compared with differences between planned and RAL-measured channel lengths. The record and verify system's treatment summary was queried to extract the RALs’ measured channel lengths. The performance of each RAL was assessed over time by comparing the treatment summary channel lengths for patient treatments with the planned values.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Double exposure films indicated that, on average, dwell positions deviated towards the applicator tip by 0.8mm (max=1.5mm). Mean difference between planned and RAL-measured channel lengths was 0.5 mm (max=0.9mm). On both RALs, more curved applicators had larger length deviations during commissioning and patient treatments. This increased curvature resulted in larger overestimates of channel length, up to 1.7mm for ovoids. Ovoid channel length deviations were similar for left and right ovoids on RAL1 at just over 1mm initially, and decreased over a 23 week period to be &lt;1mm. The deviations however remained steady for RAL2 over 10 weeks of treatment, with 90% of all values being &gt;1mm(Fig.1). Left ovoids showed larger deviation than right (1.45 vs 1.18mm respectively) (p&lt;0.01).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages S60-S61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Brachytherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1