首页 > 最新文献

BMC Medical Ethics最新文献

英文 中文
Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region. 研究伦理委员会监督的幕后:对中东和北非地区委员会主席的定性研究。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01083-3
Catherine El Ashkar, Rima Nakkash, Amal Matar, Jihad Makhoul

Background: Research cites shortcomings and challenges facing research ethics committees in many regions across the world including Arab countries. This paper presents findings from qualitative in-depth interviews with research ethics committee (REC) chairs to explore their views on the challenges they face in their work with the oversight of research involving human populations.

Methods: Virtual in-depth interviews were conducted with chairs (n = 11) from both biomedical and/or social-behavioral research ethics committees in six countries, transcribed, coded and subject to thematic analysis for recurring themes.

Results: Two sets of recurring themes impede the work of the committees and pose concerns for the quality of the research applications: (1) procedures and committee level challenges such as heavy workload, variations in member qualification, impeding bureaucratic procedures, member overwork, and intersecting socio-cultural values in the review process; (2) inconsistencies in the researchers' competence in both applied research ethics and research methodology as revealed by their applications.

Conclusions: Narratives of REC chairs are important to shed light on experiences and issues that are not captured in surveys, adding to the body of knowledge with implications for the region, and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in other parts of the world. International research collaborations could benefit from the findings.

背景:研究表明,包括阿拉伯国家在内的世界许多地区的研究伦理委员会都存在不足并面临挑战。本文介绍了对研究伦理委员会(REC)主席进行定性深入访谈的结果,以探讨他们对在监督涉及人类群体的研究工作中所面临的挑战的看法:对六个国家的生物医学和/或社会行为研究伦理委员会的主席(n = 11)进行了虚拟深入访谈,对访谈内容进行了转录和编码,并对重复出现的主题进行了专题分析:有两组重复出现的主题阻碍了委员会的工作,并对研究申请的质量造成了担忧:(1) 程序和委员会层面的挑战,如繁重的工作量、成员资质的差异、官僚程序的阻碍、成员过度劳累以及审查过程中相互交织的社会文化价值观;(2) 研究人员在应用研究伦理和研究方法方面的能力不一致,这一点从他们的申请中可以看出:区域经济共同体(REC)主席的叙述非常重要,可以揭示调查中没有反映的经验和问题,丰富知识体系,对该地区和世界其他地区的中低收入国家(LMICs)产生影响。国际研究合作可从调查结果中受益。
{"title":"Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region.","authors":"Catherine El Ashkar, Rima Nakkash, Amal Matar, Jihad Makhoul","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01083-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01083-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research cites shortcomings and challenges facing research ethics committees in many regions across the world including Arab countries. This paper presents findings from qualitative in-depth interviews with research ethics committee (REC) chairs to explore their views on the challenges they face in their work with the oversight of research involving human populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Virtual in-depth interviews were conducted with chairs (n = 11) from both biomedical and/or social-behavioral research ethics committees in six countries, transcribed, coded and subject to thematic analysis for recurring themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two sets of recurring themes impede the work of the committees and pose concerns for the quality of the research applications: (1) procedures and committee level challenges such as heavy workload, variations in member qualification, impeding bureaucratic procedures, member overwork, and intersecting socio-cultural values in the review process; (2) inconsistencies in the researchers' competence in both applied research ethics and research methodology as revealed by their applications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Narratives of REC chairs are important to shed light on experiences and issues that are not captured in surveys, adding to the body of knowledge with implications for the region, and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in other parts of the world. International research collaborations could benefit from the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308332/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship professional commitment and ethics with patient rights: a cross-sectional descriptive study. 职业承诺和职业道德与患者权利的关系:一项横断面描述性研究。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01084-2
Sara Mohammadnejad, Afsaneh Raiesifar, Zoleikha Karamelahi, Razhan Chehreh

Background: Ethical behavior of health workers is an important part of health services. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between ethics and professional commitment and its relationship with the level of respect for patient rights in medical students.

Material & methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with the participation of nursing, midwifery and emergency medicine students of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Sampling was done by stratified random method. The data was collected using Demographic, Professional Commitment, Professional ethics and a researcher made questioner on compliance with patient rights questionnaires.

Results: 300 students were participated. The results showed that the average score of professional ethics in middle school students is high (64.07 ± 8.01), the average score of professional commitment is also high (64.07 ± 8.01) and the score of respect for patient rights is also high (10.74). ± 83.46) was obtained. The professional ethics score it showed a positive and statistically significant relationship with the patient's rights compliance score. only professional commitment is related to gender, but the average of all three variables in different age groups and the type of residence (dormitory, private home, etc.) have meaningful statistical difference.

Conclusion: The findings of the study show that the level of ethics and professional commitment and respect for patient rights among nursing, midwifery and emergency medicine students was good. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide a basis for better planning for the development of knowledge and respect for patient rights among students.

背景:医务工作者的道德行为是医疗服务的重要组成部分。本研究旨在确定医科学生的职业道德与职业承诺之间的关系,及其与尊重患者权利程度之间的关系:本研究对伊拉姆医科大学护理、助产和急诊医学专业的学生进行了横断面描述性研究。抽样采用分层随机抽样法。使用人口统计学、职业承诺、职业道德和研究人员制作的患者权利遵守情况调查问卷收集数据:结果:300 名学生参与了调查。结果显示,中学生的职业道德平均得分较高(64.07 ± 8.01),职业承诺平均得分也较高(64.07 ± 8.01),尊重患者权利得分也较高(10.74)。在职业道德方面的平均得分(± 83.46)分。只有职业承诺与性别有关,但不同年龄组和居住地类型(宿舍、私人住宅等)的三个变量的平均值有有意义的统计学差异:研究结果表明,护理学、助产学和急诊医学专业学生的道德水平、职业承诺和尊重病人权利的情况良好。希望本研究的结果能为更好地规划学生对患者权利的了解和尊重提供依据。
{"title":"The relationship professional commitment and ethics with patient rights: a cross-sectional descriptive study.","authors":"Sara Mohammadnejad, Afsaneh Raiesifar, Zoleikha Karamelahi, Razhan Chehreh","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01084-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01084-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical behavior of health workers is an important part of health services. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between ethics and professional commitment and its relationship with the level of respect for patient rights in medical students.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with the participation of nursing, midwifery and emergency medicine students of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Sampling was done by stratified random method. The data was collected using Demographic, Professional Commitment, Professional ethics and a researcher made questioner on compliance with patient rights questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>300 students were participated. The results showed that the average score of professional ethics in middle school students is high (64.07 ± 8.01), the average score of professional commitment is also high (64.07 ± 8.01) and the score of respect for patient rights is also high (10.74). ± 83.46) was obtained. The professional ethics score it showed a positive and statistically significant relationship with the patient's rights compliance score. only professional commitment is related to gender, but the average of all three variables in different age groups and the type of residence (dormitory, private home, etc.) have meaningful statistical difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the study show that the level of ethics and professional commitment and respect for patient rights among nursing, midwifery and emergency medicine students was good. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide a basis for better planning for the development of knowledge and respect for patient rights among students.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295435/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethics, design, and implementation criteria of digital assistive technologies for people with dementia from a multiple stakeholder perspective: a qualitative study 从多方利益相关者的角度看痴呆症患者数字辅助技术的伦理、设计和实施标准:一项定性研究
IF 2.7 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01080-6
Stefanie Köhler, Julia Perry, Olga A. Biernetzky, Thomas Kirste, Stefan J. Teipel
Dementia impairs the ability of people with dementia to be autonomous and independent. They need support from third parties, who should ideally respect their autonomy and independence as much as possible. Supporting people with dementia can be very burdensome for caregivers and numbers of patients increase while numbers of potential caregivers decline. Digital assistive technologies (DATs) that directly support patients or their caregivers may help bridging the increasing gap between need of support and available resources. DATs have the potential to preserve the autonomy and independence of people with dementia and promote their abilities, if they are properly designed in close interaction with future users. In our study, we focused on ethical concerns, technological requirements, and implementation criteria for DAT in general and specifically to support outdoor mobility of people with dementia. We applied a qualitative approach and conducted a World Café (2 tables, n = 7) and an online focus group (n = 6) with people with dementia, relatives, healthcare professionals, scientists, ethics experts, and experts for digitally-assisted medical care. We descriptively analyzed the data using a content analysis approach. The participants reported technological (e.g., lack of Wi-Fi), financial (e.g., expensive devices or lack of budget for DATs), political (e.g., legal hurdles such as the European Medical Device Law or data protection regulations) as well as user-related hurdles (e.g., lack of digital competence) for the implementation of DAT in dementia care. Among the issues discussed were the importance of autonomy, independence, safety, privacy, and questions of decision making capacity in DAT’s use. Participants identified opportunities and benefits in self-learning, situation-aware DATs and wished for dementia-friendly communities. They emphasized the value of personal interaction that should not be replaced, but rather supported by DAT. The results revealed multiple hurdles and ethical concerns for DAT use and provided recommendations for designing and implementing DATs. Further investigations are needed on the impact of DAT on personal interactions in caregiving and the role of DAT in dementia-friendly communities.
痴呆症削弱了痴呆症患者的自主和独立能力。他们需要第三方的支持,而第三方最好应尽可能尊重他们的自主性和独立性。为痴呆症患者提供支持可能会给照顾者带来很大负担,患者人数增加的同时,潜在的照顾者人数却在减少。直接支持患者或其护理者的数字辅助技术(DATs)可能有助于缩小支持需求与可用资源之间日益扩大的差距。如果在与未来用户密切互动的基础上进行适当设计,数字辅助技术有可能保护痴呆症患者的自主性和独立性,并提高他们的能力。在我们的研究中,我们重点关注了一般 DAT 的伦理问题、技术要求和实施标准,特别是支持痴呆症患者户外行动的标准。我们采用定性方法,与痴呆症患者、亲属、医护人员、科学家、伦理专家和数字辅助医疗专家开展了 "世界咖啡馆"(2 张桌子,n = 7)和在线焦点小组(n = 6)活动。我们采用内容分析法对数据进行了描述性分析。参与者报告了在痴呆症护理中实施 DAT 所面临的技术(如缺乏 Wi-Fi)、资金(如昂贵的设备或缺乏 DAT 的预算)、政治(如法律障碍,如欧洲医疗设备法或数据保护法规)以及与用户相关的障碍(如缺乏数字能力)。讨论的问题包括自主性、独立性、安全性、隐私性的重要性,以及 DAT 使用中的决策能力问题。与会者指出了自学型、情境感知型 DAT 的机遇和益处,并希望建立痴呆症友好型社区。他们强调了人际交往的价值,认为 DAT 不应该取代人际交往,而应该为人际交往提供支持。研究结果揭示了使用数据采集器的多重障碍和伦理问题,并为数据采集器的设计和实施提供了建议。还需要进一步调查 DAT 对护理过程中个人互动的影响以及 DAT 在痴呆症友好社区中的作用。
{"title":"Ethics, design, and implementation criteria of digital assistive technologies for people with dementia from a multiple stakeholder perspective: a qualitative study","authors":"Stefanie Köhler, Julia Perry, Olga A. Biernetzky, Thomas Kirste, Stefan J. Teipel","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01080-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01080-6","url":null,"abstract":"Dementia impairs the ability of people with dementia to be autonomous and independent. They need support from third parties, who should ideally respect their autonomy and independence as much as possible. Supporting people with dementia can be very burdensome for caregivers and numbers of patients increase while numbers of potential caregivers decline. Digital assistive technologies (DATs) that directly support patients or their caregivers may help bridging the increasing gap between need of support and available resources. DATs have the potential to preserve the autonomy and independence of people with dementia and promote their abilities, if they are properly designed in close interaction with future users. In our study, we focused on ethical concerns, technological requirements, and implementation criteria for DAT in general and specifically to support outdoor mobility of people with dementia. We applied a qualitative approach and conducted a World Café (2 tables, n = 7) and an online focus group (n = 6) with people with dementia, relatives, healthcare professionals, scientists, ethics experts, and experts for digitally-assisted medical care. We descriptively analyzed the data using a content analysis approach. The participants reported technological (e.g., lack of Wi-Fi), financial (e.g., expensive devices or lack of budget for DATs), political (e.g., legal hurdles such as the European Medical Device Law or data protection regulations) as well as user-related hurdles (e.g., lack of digital competence) for the implementation of DAT in dementia care. Among the issues discussed were the importance of autonomy, independence, safety, privacy, and questions of decision making capacity in DAT’s use. Participants identified opportunities and benefits in self-learning, situation-aware DATs and wished for dementia-friendly communities. They emphasized the value of personal interaction that should not be replaced, but rather supported by DAT. The results revealed multiple hurdles and ethical concerns for DAT use and provided recommendations for designing and implementing DATs. Further investigations are needed on the impact of DAT on personal interactions in caregiving and the role of DAT in dementia-friendly communities.","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141783394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptance of euthanasia by students of selected study disciplines at universities in Lublin, Poland. 波兰卢布林大学部分专业学生对安乐死的接受程度。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01071-7
Stanisław Lachowski, Bogusława Lachowska, Magdalena Florek-Łuszczki

Background: In the context of discussions between supporters and opponents of euthanasia, and legal regulations regarding this type of practices, the attitude of young people with respect to this phenomenon is a very interesting issue. According to Polish law, euthanasia is prohibited. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of acceptance of euthanasia among students from Polish universities across three different fields of study: psychology, medicine, and economic-technical disciplines, and to identify the factors associated with the acceptance of this phenomenon.

Methods: The study included 627 persons studying in Lublin, Poland: medicine (280), psychology (170), and economic-technical studies (177). The study was conducted as a survey using questionnaire containing items concerning students' attitudes towards euthanasia. The analysis of the collected data was conducted using the SPSS software (version 29) with the following methods: Chi2, Student's t-test, Phi test, Cramer's V test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test, linear regression analysis, and categorical regression analysis using optimal scaling (CATREG).

Results: Nearly half of the students participating in the study (45.9%) rated the practice of euthanasia as decidedly negative. The highest number of strongly negative evaluations was found among psychology students, and the least among students of economic-technical disciplines. The level of acceptance of euthanasia is significantly associated with religious involvement and studying psychology. Being religious and being a psychology student both contribute to lower acceptance of euthanasia and a lower willingness to consent to euthanasia. Consent to euthanasia is more commonly declared by individuals with experience of living with elderly people.

Conclusions: Although nearly half of the respondents expressed a negative attitude towards euthanasia, considering the secularization process among Polish youth, it can be assumed that the level of acceptance of euthanasia in this social group will increase. The lower level of acceptance of euthanasia among psychology and medical students compared to students of economic-technical disciplines suggests that the curricula of these studies present alternative solutions to the problems of terminally ill patients other than euthanasia.

背景:在安乐死的支持者和反对者之间的讨论以及有关此类做法的法律规定的背景下,年轻人对这一现象的态度是一个非常有趣的问题。波兰法律禁止安乐死。本研究旨在确定波兰大学心理学、医学和经济技术学科等三个不同专业的学生对安乐死的接受程度,并找出与接受这一现象相关的因素:研究对象包括在波兰卢布林学习的 627 名学生:医学(280 人)、心理学(170 人)和经济技术学(177 人)。研究以问卷调查的形式进行,问卷中包含有关学生对安乐死态度的项目。收集到的数据使用 SPSS 软件(29 版)进行分析,分析方法如下:采用以下方法对收集到的数据进行了分析:Chi2、学生 t 检验、Phi 检验、Cramer's V 检验、Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验、单因素方差分析与 Dunnett 后检验、线性回归分析和使用最佳比例的分类回归分析 (CATREG):参与研究的学生中有近一半(45.9%)对安乐死的做法给予了坚决否定的评价。心理学专业学生的强烈负面评价最多,而经济技术专业学生的强烈负面评价最少。安乐死的接受程度与宗教信仰和心理学专业有很大关系。宗教信仰和心理学专业学生都会降低对安乐死的接受程度,也会降低同意安乐死的意愿。有与老人共同生活经验的人更常宣布同意安乐死:尽管近一半的受访者对安乐死持否定态度,但考虑到波兰青年的世俗化进程,可以认为这一社会群体对安乐死的接受程度将会提高。与经济技术专业的学生相比,心理学和医学专业的学生对安乐死的接受程度较低,这表明这些专业的课程为临终病人问题提供了安乐死之外的其他解决方案。
{"title":"Acceptance of euthanasia by students of selected study disciplines at universities in Lublin, Poland.","authors":"Stanisław Lachowski, Bogusława Lachowska, Magdalena Florek-Łuszczki","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01071-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01071-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of discussions between supporters and opponents of euthanasia, and legal regulations regarding this type of practices, the attitude of young people with respect to this phenomenon is a very interesting issue. According to Polish law, euthanasia is prohibited. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of acceptance of euthanasia among students from Polish universities across three different fields of study: psychology, medicine, and economic-technical disciplines, and to identify the factors associated with the acceptance of this phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 627 persons studying in Lublin, Poland: medicine (280), psychology (170), and economic-technical studies (177). The study was conducted as a survey using questionnaire containing items concerning students' attitudes towards euthanasia. The analysis of the collected data was conducted using the SPSS software (version 29) with the following methods: Chi<sup>2</sup>, Student's t-test, Phi test, Cramer's V test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test, linear regression analysis, and categorical regression analysis using optimal scaling (CATREG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half of the students participating in the study (45.9%) rated the practice of euthanasia as decidedly negative. The highest number of strongly negative evaluations was found among psychology students, and the least among students of economic-technical disciplines. The level of acceptance of euthanasia is significantly associated with religious involvement and studying psychology. Being religious and being a psychology student both contribute to lower acceptance of euthanasia and a lower willingness to consent to euthanasia. Consent to euthanasia is more commonly declared by individuals with experience of living with elderly people.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although nearly half of the respondents expressed a negative attitude towards euthanasia, considering the secularization process among Polish youth, it can be assumed that the level of acceptance of euthanasia in this social group will increase. The lower level of acceptance of euthanasia among psychology and medical students compared to students of economic-technical disciplines suggests that the curricula of these studies present alternative solutions to the problems of terminally ill patients other than euthanasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141768030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The body as an obstacle and the "other". How patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases view their body, self and the good life. 身体是障碍和 "他人"。慢性炎症性肠病患者如何看待自己的身体、自我和美好生活。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01076-2
Anke Erdmann, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Florian Schrinner, Claudia Bozzaro

Background: Treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) aims to improve patients' quality of life and the extent of treatment success is measured via patient reported outcomes (PROs). However, questionnaires used to collect PROs often include scales that are not specific to IBDs. Improving these scales requires a deeper understanding of patients' lived experience. With this study we give first insights and develop hypotheses on how patients with IBDs experience their body and self and how they adjust their life plans in the context of precision medicine (PM). The guiding question is to understand what they need to achieve a good life, while facing their disease.

Methods: We developed a conception of the "good life" that draws on Philippa Foot's "naturalized" approach and distinguishes six different dimensions that are relevant for a good life. This conception guided us as we conducted 10 qualitative interviews with patients suffering from IBD who were in precision medicine clinical research settings. The interviews aimed to gain insights for answering our research question: How do body experiences affect the good life of patients with IBD? We analyzed the interviews with interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).

Results: Five group experiential themes emerged: (i) Life options and plans, (ii) other people's responses, (iii) strategies to deal with others' responses, (iv) perception of the body and self, and (v) perception of life as good despite suffering. We report here on three of them (i, iv and v), which are primarily relevant for evaluating the outcomes of PM care. Whereas with "life options and plans (i)," our study predominantly confirmed previous research, with "perception of the body and self (iv)," we found that some of the patients changed their relationship to their body and themselves. They perceived the body or the disease as the "other" and their self appears divorced from their own body. Although this might be an avoidance strategy patients use to assign responsibility for their condition and its "disgusting" symptoms to the "other," it is important to include it in patient reported outcome (PRO) assessments.

Conclusions: We conclude with the insight that the multi-dimensional approach based on Foot's concept of a good life is well-suited as a basis for investigating the quality of life of people with IBD. Interviews based on this concept produced results that go beyond the understanding of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Additionally, we offer some considerations about patients' opportunities for achieving a good life and suggestions for further developing patient reported outcome scales.

背景:慢性炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗旨在改善患者的生活质量,治疗成功的程度通过患者报告结果(PROs)来衡量。然而,用于收集 PROs 的调查问卷通常包含一些并非专门针对 IBD 的量表。改进这些量表需要更深入地了解患者的生活经历。通过这项研究,我们首次深入了解了 IBD 患者如何体验自己的身体和自我,以及他们如何在精准医疗(PM)的背景下调整自己的生活计划,并提出了相关假设。指导性问题是了解他们在面对疾病的同时,需要什么来实现美好生活:我们借鉴 Philippa Foot 的 "自然化 "方法,提出了 "美好生活 "的概念,并区分了与美好生活相关的六个不同维度。在这一概念的指导下,我们对精准医学临床研究环境中的 IBD 患者进行了 10 次定性访谈。访谈的目的是为了回答我们的研究问题:身体体验如何影响 IBD 患者的美好生活?我们采用解释现象学分析法(IPA)对访谈进行了分析:结果:出现了五个群体体验主题:(i) 生活选择和计划,(ii) 其他人的反应,(iii) 应对他人反应的策略,(iv) 对身体和自我的感知,以及 (v) 尽管遭受痛苦,但仍认为生活是美好的。我们在此报告其中的三个方面(i、iv 和 v),它们主要与评估 PM 护理的结果相关。在 "生活选择和计划(i)"方面,我们的研究主要证实了以往的研究,而在 "对身体和自我的感知(iv)"方面,我们发现一些患者改变了他们与身体和自身的关系。他们将身体或疾病视为 "他者",自我似乎与自己的身体相分离。虽然这可能是患者用来将自身病情及其 "恶心 "症状的责任归咎于 "他人 "的一种回避策略,但将其纳入患者报告结果(PRO)评估非常重要:我们的结论是,基于 Foot 美好生活概念的多维方法非常适合作为调查 IBD 患者生活质量的基础。基于这一概念的访谈结果超越了对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的理解。此外,我们还就患者实现美好生活的机会提出了一些思考,并就进一步开发患者报告结果量表提出了建议。
{"title":"The body as an obstacle and the \"other\". How patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases view their body, self and the good life.","authors":"Anke Erdmann, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Florian Schrinner, Claudia Bozzaro","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01076-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01076-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) aims to improve patients' quality of life and the extent of treatment success is measured via patient reported outcomes (PROs). However, questionnaires used to collect PROs often include scales that are not specific to IBDs. Improving these scales requires a deeper understanding of patients' lived experience. With this study we give first insights and develop hypotheses on how patients with IBDs experience their body and self and how they adjust their life plans in the context of precision medicine (PM). The guiding question is to understand what they need to achieve a good life, while facing their disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a conception of the \"good life\" that draws on Philippa Foot's \"naturalized\" approach and distinguishes six different dimensions that are relevant for a good life. This conception guided us as we conducted 10 qualitative interviews with patients suffering from IBD who were in precision medicine clinical research settings. The interviews aimed to gain insights for answering our research question: How do body experiences affect the good life of patients with IBD? We analyzed the interviews with interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five group experiential themes emerged: (i) Life options and plans, (ii) other people's responses, (iii) strategies to deal with others' responses, (iv) perception of the body and self, and (v) perception of life as good despite suffering. We report here on three of them (i, iv and v), which are primarily relevant for evaluating the outcomes of PM care. Whereas with \"life options and plans (i),\" our study predominantly confirmed previous research, with \"perception of the body and self (iv),\" we found that some of the patients changed their relationship to their body and themselves. They perceived the body or the disease as the \"other\" and their self appears divorced from their own body. Although this might be an avoidance strategy patients use to assign responsibility for their condition and its \"disgusting\" symptoms to the \"other,\" it is important to include it in patient reported outcome (PRO) assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude with the insight that the multi-dimensional approach based on Foot's concept of a good life is well-suited as a basis for investigating the quality of life of people with IBD. Interviews based on this concept produced results that go beyond the understanding of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Additionally, we offer some considerations about patients' opportunities for achieving a good life and suggestions for further developing patient reported outcome scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267929/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141762832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'It's not making a decision, it's prompting the discussions': a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE). 这不是做决定,而是引发讨论":一项定性研究,探讨利益相关者对预先研究规划(CONSULT-ADVANCE)的可接受性和可行性的看法。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01081-5
Victoria Shepherd, Kerenza Hood, Fiona Wood

Background: Health and care research involving people who lack capacity to consent requires an alternative decision maker to decide whether they participate or not based on their 'presumed will'. However, this is often unknown. Advance research planning (ARP) is a process for people who anticipate periods of impaired capacity to prospectively express their preferences about research participation and identify who they wish to be involved in future decisions. This may help to extend individuals' autonomy by ensuring that proxy decisions are based on their actual wishes. This qualitative study aimed to explore stakeholders' views about the acceptability and feasibility of ARP and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the UK.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 researchers, practitioners, and members of the public who had participated in a preceding survey. Interviews were conducted remotely between April and November 2023. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Participants were supportive of the concept of ARP, with differing amounts of support for the range of possible ARP activities depending on the context. Six main themes were identified: (1) Planting a seed - creating opportunities to initiate/engage with ARP; (2) A missing part of the puzzle - how preferences expressed through ARP could help inform decisions; (3) Finding the sweet spot - optimising the timing of ARP; (4) More than a piece of paper - finding the best mode for recording preferences; (5) Keeping the door open to future opportunities - minimising the risk of unintended consequences; and (6) Navigating with a compass - principles underpinning ARP to ensure safeguarding and help address inequalities. Participants also identified a number of implementation challenges, and proposed facilitative strategies that might overcome them which included embedding advance research planning in existing future planning processes and research-focused activities.

Conclusions: This study provides a routemap to implementing ARP in the UK to enable people anticipating impaired capacity to express their preferences about research, thus ensuring greater opportunities for inclusion of this under-served group, and addressing the decisional burden experienced by some family members acting as proxies. Development of interventions and guidance to support ARP is needed, with a focus on ensuring accessibility.

背景:涉及缺乏同意能力者的健康和护理研究需要有一个替代决策者,根据他们的 "推定意愿 "决定是否参与。然而,这往往是未知的。预先研究规划 (ARP) 是一种程序,让预计能力受损的人预先表达他们对参与研究的偏好,并确定他们希望谁参与未来的决策。通过确保代理决定基于个人的实际意愿,这可能有助于扩大个人的自主权。本定性研究旨在探讨利益相关者对 ARP 可接受性和可行性的看法,并确定在英国实施 ARP 的障碍和促进因素:我们对 27 名研究人员、从业人员以及参与过之前调查的公众进行了半结构化访谈。访谈于 2023 年 4 月至 11 月间远程进行。对数据进行了专题分析:结果:参与者对 ARP 概念表示支持,但对 ARP 可能开展的一系列活动的支持程度因情况而异。确定了六大主题:(1) 播下一粒种子--创造机会启动/参与评估与研究计划;(2) 拼图中缺失的部分--通过评估与研究计划表达的偏好如何有助于为决策提供信息;(3) 找到最佳点--优化评估与研究计划的时机;(4) 不仅仅是一张纸--找到记录偏好的最佳模式;(5) 为未来的机会敞开大门--最大限度地降低意外后果的风险;(6) 用指南针导航--评估与研究计划的基本原则,以确保安全并帮助解决不平等问题。与会者还确定了一些实施挑战,并提出了可能克服这些挑战的促进战略,其中包括将预先研究规划纳入现有的未来规划流程和以研究为重点的活动:本研究提供了在英国实施预先研究规划的路线图,使预期能力受损的人能够表达他们对研究的偏好,从而确保这一服务不足的群体有更多机会参与其中,并解决一些作为代理人的家庭成员所经历的决策负担。需要制定支持 ARP 的干预措施和指南,重点是确保无障碍性。
{"title":"'It's not making a decision, it's prompting the discussions': a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE).","authors":"Victoria Shepherd, Kerenza Hood, Fiona Wood","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01081-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01081-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health and care research involving people who lack capacity to consent requires an alternative decision maker to decide whether they participate or not based on their 'presumed will'. However, this is often unknown. Advance research planning (ARP) is a process for people who anticipate periods of impaired capacity to prospectively express their preferences about research participation and identify who they wish to be involved in future decisions. This may help to extend individuals' autonomy by ensuring that proxy decisions are based on their actual wishes. This qualitative study aimed to explore stakeholders' views about the acceptability and feasibility of ARP and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 researchers, practitioners, and members of the public who had participated in a preceding survey. Interviews were conducted remotely between April and November 2023. Data were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were supportive of the concept of ARP, with differing amounts of support for the range of possible ARP activities depending on the context. Six main themes were identified: (1) Planting a seed - creating opportunities to initiate/engage with ARP; (2) A missing part of the puzzle - how preferences expressed through ARP could help inform decisions; (3) Finding the sweet spot - optimising the timing of ARP; (4) More than a piece of paper - finding the best mode for recording preferences; (5) Keeping the door open to future opportunities - minimising the risk of unintended consequences; and (6) Navigating with a compass - principles underpinning ARP to ensure safeguarding and help address inequalities. Participants also identified a number of implementation challenges, and proposed facilitative strategies that might overcome them which included embedding advance research planning in existing future planning processes and research-focused activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a routemap to implementing ARP in the UK to enable people anticipating impaired capacity to express their preferences about research, thus ensuring greater opportunities for inclusion of this under-served group, and addressing the decisional burden experienced by some family members acting as proxies. Development of interventions and guidance to support ARP is needed, with a focus on ensuring accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of an interactive education workshop on hospital pharmacists' ethical reasoning: an observational study. 医院药剂师伦理推理互动教育研讨会评估:一项观察研究。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01082-4
Nallini McCleery, Adam La Caze, Karl Winckel, H Laetitia Hattingh

Background: Pharmacists are often faced with scenarios in practice that require application of ethical reasoning and decision-making skills. There is limited research on the ethical decision-making processes of hospital pharmacists. Pharmacists who are compassionate and put the interests of their patients first are thought to positively impact on patient care, but there are often complex health-care system pressures in the hospital setting that cause pharmacists to behave in ways that may conflict with professional values and behaviours. This multisite study aimed to evaluate an interactive education workshop on hospital pharmacists' ethical reasoning skills and explore the need for ongoing training and support.

Methods: This mixed-methods study was carried out across two health services including three hospitals. It incorporated a pre-workshop survey, a feedback survey immediately post-workshop and a third survey four weeks after the workshop. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists at least four weeks after the ethics workshop.

Results: In total, 32 participants completed the pre-workshop survey, nominating peers/colleagues as the most common source of support they would consult to inform ethical decision-making (17/118 sources of support). Almost all (n = 31/33; 94%) strongly agreed/agreed that the education session provided them with ethical reasoning skills and a process/framework which they could use when faced with an ethical issue. Pre- and post-survey responses showed increased self-confidence in identifying the regulatory frameworks applicable to pharmacy privacy requirements (p = 0.011) and ethical issues applicable to pharmacy privacy requirements (p = 0.002), as well as applying ethical reasoning to scenarios that involve pharmacy privacy dilemmas/issues (p = 0.004). Participants' self confidence in knowing where to find support when faced with clinical and non-clinical ethics questions was improved (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003 respectively). Participants supported the introduction of quarterly ethics cafes after the workshop, compared to before the workshop (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Hospital pharmacists rely on discussions with colleagues to brainstorm how to address ethical issues. This study showed that a targeted interactive education workshop facilitated familiarity with ethics resources and decision-making processes. It also demonstrated that this approach could be used to enhance hospital pharmacists' readiness, confidence, and capabilities to recognise and respond to challenging ethical issues.

背景:药剂师在实践中经常会遇到需要运用道德推理和决策技能的情况。有关医院药剂师伦理决策过程的研究十分有限。富有同情心并将患者利益放在首位的药剂师被认为会对患者护理产生积极影响,但医院环境中往往存在复杂的医疗保健系统压力,导致药剂师的行为可能与专业价值观和行为相冲突。这项多地点研究旨在评估医院药剂师道德推理技能互动教育研讨会,并探讨持续培训和支持的必要性:这项混合方法研究在两家医疗服务机构(包括三家医院)进行。其中包括一项工作坊前调查、一项工作坊后即时反馈调查和一项工作坊四周后的第三次调查。在伦理研讨会结束至少四周后,对医院药剂师进行了半结构式访谈:共有 32 名学员完成了工作坊前的问卷调查,他们认为同行/同事是他们在做出伦理决策时最常咨询的支持来源(17/118 支持来源)。几乎所有学员(n = 31/33;94%)都非常同意/同意教育课程为他们提供了伦理推理技能以及在遇到伦理问题时可以使用的程序/框架。会前和会后调查显示,参与者在识别适用于药房隐私要求的监管框架(p = 0.011)和适用于药房隐私要求的伦理问题(p = 0.002),以及将伦理推理应用于涉及药房隐私困境/问题的情景(p = 0.004)方面的自信心有所增强。参与者在面对临床和非临床伦理问题时知道从哪里寻求支持的自信心得到了提高(分别为 p = 0.002 和 p = 0.003)。与研讨会前相比,与会者支持在研讨会后引入季度伦理咖啡馆(p = 0.001):医院药剂师依赖与同事的讨论来集思广益解决伦理问题。本研究表明,有针对性的互动教育研讨会有助于熟悉伦理资源和决策流程。研究还表明,这种方法可用于提高医院药剂师的准备度、信心以及识别和应对具有挑战性的伦理问题的能力。
{"title":"Evaluation of an interactive education workshop on hospital pharmacists' ethical reasoning: an observational study.","authors":"Nallini McCleery, Adam La Caze, Karl Winckel, H Laetitia Hattingh","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01082-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01082-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists are often faced with scenarios in practice that require application of ethical reasoning and decision-making skills. There is limited research on the ethical decision-making processes of hospital pharmacists. Pharmacists who are compassionate and put the interests of their patients first are thought to positively impact on patient care, but there are often complex health-care system pressures in the hospital setting that cause pharmacists to behave in ways that may conflict with professional values and behaviours. This multisite study aimed to evaluate an interactive education workshop on hospital pharmacists' ethical reasoning skills and explore the need for ongoing training and support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study was carried out across two health services including three hospitals. It incorporated a pre-workshop survey, a feedback survey immediately post-workshop and a third survey four weeks after the workshop. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists at least four weeks after the ethics workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 participants completed the pre-workshop survey, nominating peers/colleagues as the most common source of support they would consult to inform ethical decision-making (17/118 sources of support). Almost all (n = 31/33; 94%) strongly agreed/agreed that the education session provided them with ethical reasoning skills and a process/framework which they could use when faced with an ethical issue. Pre- and post-survey responses showed increased self-confidence in identifying the regulatory frameworks applicable to pharmacy privacy requirements (p = 0.011) and ethical issues applicable to pharmacy privacy requirements (p = 0.002), as well as applying ethical reasoning to scenarios that involve pharmacy privacy dilemmas/issues (p = 0.004). Participants' self confidence in knowing where to find support when faced with clinical and non-clinical ethics questions was improved (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003 respectively). Participants supported the introduction of quarterly ethics cafes after the workshop, compared to before the workshop (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospital pharmacists rely on discussions with colleagues to brainstorm how to address ethical issues. This study showed that a targeted interactive education workshop facilitated familiarity with ethics resources and decision-making processes. It also demonstrated that this approach could be used to enhance hospital pharmacists' readiness, confidence, and capabilities to recognise and respond to challenging ethical issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264360/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review. 麻疹疫情爆发期间的伦理考虑因素:范围审查。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0
Fatma Badr El Dine, Assem Gebreal, Dalia Samhouri, Haimanot Estifanos, Islam Kourampi, Hasnaa Abdelrhem, Hamed Abdelma'aboud Mostafa, Ahmed Gamal Elshaar, Tarun Kumar Suvvari, Ramy Mohamed Ghazy

Background: Historically, epidemics have been accompanied by the concurrent emergence of stigma, prejudice, and xenophobia. This scoping review aimed to describe and map published research targeting ethical values concerning monkeypox (mpox). In addition, it aimed to understand the research gaps related to mpox associated stigma.

Methods: We comprehensively searched databases (PubMed Central, PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar) to identify published literature concerning mpox ethical issues and stigma from May 6, 2022, to February 15, 2023. The key search terms used were "monkeypox", "ethics", "morals", "social stigma", "privacy", "confidentiality", "secrecy", "privilege", "egoism", and "metaethics". This scoping review followed the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005 and was further improved by the recommendations of Levac et al. in 2010.

Results: The search strategies employed in the scoping review yielded a total of 454 articles. We analyzed the sources, types, and topics of the retrieved articles/studies. The authors were able to identify 32 studies that met inclusion criteria. Six of the 32 included studies were primary research. The study revealed that the ongoing mpox outbreak is contending with a notable surge in misinformation and societal stigma. It highlights the adverse impacts of stigma and ethical concerns associated with mpox, which can negatively affect people with the disease.

Conclusion: The study's findings underscore the imperative need to enhance public awareness; involve civil society; and promote collaboration among policymakers, medical communities, and social media platforms. These collective endeavors are crucial for mitigating stigma, averting human-to-human transmission, tackling racism, and dispelling misconceptions associated with the outbreak.

背景:从历史上看,流行病的发生都伴随着污名化、偏见和仇外心理的同时出现。本综述旨在描述和描绘已发表的针对猴痘伦理价值的研究。此外,它还旨在了解与猴痘相关的耻辱感方面的研究空白:我们对数据库(PubMed Central、PubMed Medline、Scopus、Web of Science、Ovid 和 Google Scholar)进行了全面检索,以确定 2022 年 5 月 6 日至 2023 年 2 月 15 日期间发表的有关猴痘伦理问题和耻辱感的文献。使用的关键检索词包括 "猴痘"、"伦理"、"道德"、"社会污名"、"隐私"、"保密"、"机密"、"特权"、"利己主义 "和 "元伦理学"。此次范围界定研究遵循了 Arksey 和 O'Malley 于 2005 年提出的框架,并根据 Levac 等人于 2010 年提出的建议作了进一步改进:此次范围界定审查采用的搜索策略共搜索到 454 篇文章。我们对检索到的文章/研究的来源、类型和主题进行了分析。作者确定了 32 项符合纳入标准的研究。在 32 项纳入的研究中,有 6 项是初级研究。研究显示,目前正在爆发的水痘疫情正受到误传和社会污名化的严重影响。研究强调了与天花相关的污名化和伦理问题的负面影响,这可能会对患者产生负面影响:研究结果强调,当务之急是提高公众意识,让民间社会参与进来,并促进决策者、医疗界和社交媒体平台之间的合作。这些集体努力对于减轻耻辱感、避免人际传播、解决种族主义问题以及消除与疫情相关的误解至关重要。
{"title":"Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review.","authors":"Fatma Badr El Dine, Assem Gebreal, Dalia Samhouri, Haimanot Estifanos, Islam Kourampi, Hasnaa Abdelrhem, Hamed Abdelma'aboud Mostafa, Ahmed Gamal Elshaar, Tarun Kumar Suvvari, Ramy Mohamed Ghazy","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, epidemics have been accompanied by the concurrent emergence of stigma, prejudice, and xenophobia. This scoping review aimed to describe and map published research targeting ethical values concerning monkeypox (mpox). In addition, it aimed to understand the research gaps related to mpox associated stigma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We comprehensively searched databases (PubMed Central, PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar) to identify published literature concerning mpox ethical issues and stigma from May 6, 2022, to February 15, 2023. The key search terms used were \"monkeypox\", \"ethics\", \"morals\", \"social stigma\", \"privacy\", \"confidentiality\", \"secrecy\", \"privilege\", \"egoism\", and \"metaethics\". This scoping review followed the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005 and was further improved by the recommendations of Levac et al. in 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategies employed in the scoping review yielded a total of 454 articles. We analyzed the sources, types, and topics of the retrieved articles/studies. The authors were able to identify 32 studies that met inclusion criteria. Six of the 32 included studies were primary research. The study revealed that the ongoing mpox outbreak is contending with a notable surge in misinformation and societal stigma. It highlights the adverse impacts of stigma and ethical concerns associated with mpox, which can negatively affect people with the disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study's findings underscore the imperative need to enhance public awareness; involve civil society; and promote collaboration among policymakers, medical communities, and social media platforms. These collective endeavors are crucial for mitigating stigma, averting human-to-human transmission, tackling racism, and dispelling misconceptions associated with the outbreak.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265031/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists. 人工智能为无行为能力患者的伦理决策提供支持:一项针对德国麻醉师和内科医生的调查。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01079-z
Lasse Benzinger, Jelena Epping, Frank Ursin, Sabine Salloch

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various healthcare domains, where AI algorithms sometimes even outperform human specialists. However, the field of clinical ethics has remained largely untouched by AI advances. This study explores the attitudes of anesthesiologists and internists towards the use of AI-driven preference prediction tools to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed and pretested among medical students. The questionnaire was distributed to 200 German anesthesiologists and 200 German internists, thereby focusing on physicians who often encounter patients lacking decision-making capacity. The questionnaire covered attitudes toward AI-driven preference prediction, availability and utilization of Clinical Ethics Support Services (CESS), and experiences with ethically challenging situations. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis was performed. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis in a mixed inductive-deductive approach.

Results: Participants were predominantly male (69.3%), with ages ranging from 27 to 77. Most worked in nonacademic hospitals (82%). Physicians generally showed hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction, citing concerns about the loss of individuality and humanity, lack of explicability in AI results, and doubts about AI's ability to encompass the ethical deliberation process. In contrast, physicians had a more positive opinion of CESS. Availability of CESS varied, with 81.8% of participants reporting access. Among those without access, 91.8% expressed a desire for CESS. Physicians' reluctance toward AI-driven preference prediction aligns with concerns about transparency, individuality, and human-machine interaction. While AI could enhance the accuracy of predictions and reduce surrogate burden, concerns about potential biases, de-humanisation, and lack of explicability persist.

Conclusions: German physicians frequently encountering incapacitated patients exhibit hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction but hold a higher esteem for CESS. Addressing concerns about individuality, explicability, and human-machine roles may facilitate the acceptance of AI in clinical ethics. Further research into patient and surrogate perspectives is needed to ensure AI aligns with patient preferences and values in complex medical decisions.

背景:人工智能(AI)已经彻底改变了各种医疗保健领域,在这些领域,人工智能算法有时甚至胜过人类专家。然而,临床伦理领域在很大程度上仍未受到人工智能进步的影响。本研究探讨了麻醉科医生和内科医生对使用人工智能驱动的偏好预测工具为无行为能力患者的伦理决策提供支持的态度:方法:编制了一份调查问卷,并在医学生中进行了预先测试。问卷发放给了 200 名德国麻醉师和 200 名德国内科医生,从而将重点放在了经常遇到缺乏决策能力患者的医生身上。问卷内容包括对人工智能驱动的偏好预测的态度、临床伦理支持服务(CESS)的可用性和利用率,以及应对伦理挑战情况的经验。对问卷进行了描述性统计和双变量分析。采用归纳-演绎混合方法对定性回答进行了内容分析:参与者主要为男性(69.3%),年龄从 27 岁到 77 岁不等。大多数人在非学术性医院工作(82%)。医生们普遍对人工智能驱动的偏好预测表现出犹豫不决的态度,理由是担心丧失个性和人性、人工智能结果缺乏可解释性,以及怀疑人工智能是否有能力涵盖伦理审议过程。相比之下,医生对 CESS 的看法更为积极。CESS的可用性各不相同,81.8%的参与者表示可以使用。在无法使用 CESS 的参与者中,91.8% 表示希望使用 CESS。医生不愿意接受人工智能驱动的偏好预测,这与他们对透明度、个性化和人机交互的担忧是一致的。虽然人工智能可以提高预测的准确性并减轻代理人的负担,但对潜在偏见、去人性化和缺乏可解释性的担忧依然存在:德国医生经常遇到丧失工作能力的病人,他们对人工智能驱动的偏好预测表现出犹豫不决,但对 CESS 则更为推崇。解决对个体性、可解释性和人机角色的担忧可能会促进人工智能在临床伦理学中被接受。要确保人工智能在复杂的医疗决策中符合患者的偏好和价值观,还需要进一步研究患者和代理人的观点。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists.","authors":"Lasse Benzinger, Jelena Epping, Frank Ursin, Sabine Salloch","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01079-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01079-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various healthcare domains, where AI algorithms sometimes even outperform human specialists. However, the field of clinical ethics has remained largely untouched by AI advances. This study explores the attitudes of anesthesiologists and internists towards the use of AI-driven preference prediction tools to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed and pretested among medical students. The questionnaire was distributed to 200 German anesthesiologists and 200 German internists, thereby focusing on physicians who often encounter patients lacking decision-making capacity. The questionnaire covered attitudes toward AI-driven preference prediction, availability and utilization of Clinical Ethics Support Services (CESS), and experiences with ethically challenging situations. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis was performed. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis in a mixed inductive-deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were predominantly male (69.3%), with ages ranging from 27 to 77. Most worked in nonacademic hospitals (82%). Physicians generally showed hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction, citing concerns about the loss of individuality and humanity, lack of explicability in AI results, and doubts about AI's ability to encompass the ethical deliberation process. In contrast, physicians had a more positive opinion of CESS. Availability of CESS varied, with 81.8% of participants reporting access. Among those without access, 91.8% expressed a desire for CESS. Physicians' reluctance toward AI-driven preference prediction aligns with concerns about transparency, individuality, and human-machine interaction. While AI could enhance the accuracy of predictions and reduce surrogate burden, concerns about potential biases, de-humanisation, and lack of explicability persist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>German physicians frequently encountering incapacitated patients exhibit hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction but hold a higher esteem for CESS. Addressing concerns about individuality, explicability, and human-machine roles may facilitate the acceptance of AI in clinical ethics. Further research into patient and surrogate perspectives is needed to ensure AI aligns with patient preferences and values in complex medical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256615/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141725140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethical requirements of instructions for authors of complementary and alternative medicine journals: a cross-sectional study. 补充和替代医学期刊作者须知的伦理要求:一项横断面研究。
IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01077-1
Chenyu Ren, Yixuan Li, Peipei Du, Xuebin Zhang, Wanjun Xue, Chi Zhang

Background: Medical research in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased recently, raising ethical concerns about the moral status of CAM. Medical academic journals are responsible for conducting ethical review (ER) of manuscripts to protect the interests of human subjects and to make ethical results available before deciding to publish. However, there has been no systematic analysis of the ER in CAM journals. This study is aim to evaluate the current status of ethical requirements and compliance in CAM journals.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. We reviewed instructions for authors (IFAs) of CAM journals included in the Journal Citation Reports (2021) ( https://jcr.clarivate.com ) for general information and requirements for ER. We also browsed the manuscripts regarding randomized controlled trials published by CAM journals in Q1 and Q2 section from January to June, 2023, to check the actual situation of ethical requirement. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: 27 journals and 68 manuscripts were ultimately included. 92.6% (25/27) IFAs included keywords of ER, indicating the presence of ethical considerations. However, no specific ER was required for CAM (n = 0). We categorized journals by Geographic origin, JCR section, Year of electronic JCR, Types of studies, % of OA Gold to explore the factors that could influence CAM journals to have certain ethical review policies. The results showed there was no statistical significance in certain ethical review policy in any classification of journals (p > 0.05). All RCT manuscripts included in the study generally met the requirements of the published journals for ethical review.

Conclusions: All IFAs discussed ER, but the content was scattered, unfocused, and there were no specific ER requirements regarding CAM. Although the manuscripts basically met the requirements of the journal, it was not possible to get closer to the process of ER in the manuscript. To ensure full implementation of these policies in the future, CAM journals should require authors to provide more details, or to form a list of items necessary for CAM ethical review.

背景:补充和替代医学(CAM)方面的医学研究近来有所增加,引发了人们对 CAM 道德地位的关注。医学学术期刊有责任对稿件进行伦理审查(ER),以保护人类受试者的利益,并在决定发表前提供符合伦理的结果。然而,目前还没有对 CAM 期刊的伦理审查进行系统分析。本研究旨在评估目前 CAM 期刊的伦理要求和遵守情况:这是一项横向研究。我们查阅了《期刊引证报告》(2021 年)( https://jcr.clarivate.com )中收录的 CAM 期刊的作者须知(IFAs),以了解一般信息和伦理要求。我们还浏览了2023年1月至6月CAM期刊在Q1和Q2版发表的有关随机对照试验的稿件,以了解伦理要求的实际情况。统计分析采用描述性统计和费雪精确检验。92.6%(25/27)的《国际金融报》包含伦理要求的关键词,表明存在伦理方面的考虑。然而,CAM(n = 0)不需要特定的 ER。我们按照地理来源、JCR 栏目、JCR 电子版年份、研究类型、OA 金牌娱乐百分比对期刊进行了分类,以探讨可能影响 CAM 期刊制定某些伦理审查政策的因素。结果表明,在任何期刊分类中,某些伦理审查政策均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。本研究收录的所有 RCT 手稿基本符合已出版期刊的伦理审查要求:所有的《国际金融报》都讨论了伦理审查,但内容分散、重点不突出,而且没有对 CAM 提出具体的伦理审查要求。虽然稿件基本符合期刊要求,但无法更贴近稿件中的伦理审查过程。为确保这些政策在未来得到全面落实,CAM期刊应要求作者提供更多细节,或形成CAM伦理审查的必要项目清单。
{"title":"Ethical requirements of instructions for authors of complementary and alternative medicine journals: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Chenyu Ren, Yixuan Li, Peipei Du, Xuebin Zhang, Wanjun Xue, Chi Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01077-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12910-024-01077-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical research in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased recently, raising ethical concerns about the moral status of CAM. Medical academic journals are responsible for conducting ethical review (ER) of manuscripts to protect the interests of human subjects and to make ethical results available before deciding to publish. However, there has been no systematic analysis of the ER in CAM journals. This study is aim to evaluate the current status of ethical requirements and compliance in CAM journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study. We reviewed instructions for authors (IFAs) of CAM journals included in the Journal Citation Reports (2021) ( https://jcr.clarivate.com ) for general information and requirements for ER. We also browsed the manuscripts regarding randomized controlled trials published by CAM journals in Q1 and Q2 section from January to June, 2023, to check the actual situation of ethical requirement. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 journals and 68 manuscripts were ultimately included. 92.6% (25/27) IFAs included keywords of ER, indicating the presence of ethical considerations. However, no specific ER was required for CAM (n = 0). We categorized journals by Geographic origin, JCR section, Year of electronic JCR, Types of studies, % of OA Gold to explore the factors that could influence CAM journals to have certain ethical review policies. The results showed there was no statistical significance in certain ethical review policy in any classification of journals (p > 0.05). All RCT manuscripts included in the study generally met the requirements of the published journals for ethical review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All IFAs discussed ER, but the content was scattered, unfocused, and there were no specific ER requirements regarding CAM. Although the manuscripts basically met the requirements of the journal, it was not possible to get closer to the process of ER in the manuscript. To ensure full implementation of these policies in the future, CAM journals should require authors to provide more details, or to form a list of items necessary for CAM ethical review.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141604510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1