<p>In 1963, Reynolds and Cook observed that <i>oxygen is vitally important</i> (in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis) <i>and there is little evidence that any other therapy is consistently or even occasionally useful</i> [<span>1</span>] and this still holds true more than 60 years later. In the study by Loveys et al. published in this issue [<span>2</span>] the authors address the suggestion that the macrolide antibiotic, azithromycin, may reduce the severity of the acute illness and the prevalence of subsequent respiratory symptoms. They concluded <i>‘</i>There is insufficient evidence to support the use of azithromycin as part of hospital care for infants with bronchiolitis<i>’</i>. While none of the included studies individually found evidence to support the use of macrolides, the initial meta-analysis suggested that it may have a small effect on the length of stay. However, in their sensitivity analysis, which involved removing the studies that reported longer durations of stay than the authors felt were typical for Australasia [<span>2</span>], this apparent effect disappeared.</p><p>Azithromycin joins an extensive list of potential therapies which fell by the wayside when subject to more rigorous testing. These include ‘asthma therapies’ such as β-agonists, corticosteroids, theophylline, anti-cholinergics and a leukotriene antagonist; antibiotics and antivirals and approaches to improve airways clearance including inhaled hypertonic saline and physiotherapy. Despite the evidence, adherence to guidelines is frequently poor as illustrated by the two Australasian studies in which non-macrolide antibiotics were used in 60%–70% of patients. The rationale for using a macrolide antibiotic in these studies was based on having anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and anti-viral effects [<span>2</span>]. Macrolides appear to have a role in downregulating neutrophilic inflammation and, as noted by Loveys et al., the airways inflammation in bronchiolitis is dominated by neutrophils. The use of azithromycin has become ubiquitous, particularly in adult respiratory medicine, largely because of its perceived anti-inflammatory effects (even though, as in these studies, it is used at doses that have antibacterial activity). The downside of using this convenient ‘magic bullet’ so widely is, of course, the fact that macrolides are extremely effective in driving antimicrobial resistance [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Every paediatrician knows what ‘acute bronchiolitis’ looks like when they see it, but there is no universally agreed definition. There is no definitive test for the condition, and the diagnosis is based on a cluster of signs [<span>4</span>]. The studies included in the review allow subjects to have crackles and/or wheeze as a sign of airways obstruction. Crackles are generally observed in young infants (< 6 months) and represent the snapping opening of alveolar units. Secretions in the airways and mucosal oedema are almost certainly responsible for
{"title":"Bronchiolitis (The Snotty Lung): Prevention Is Likely to Be More Helpful Than a ‘Cure’","authors":"Mark L. Everard","doi":"10.1111/apa.70384","DOIUrl":"10.1111/apa.70384","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1963, Reynolds and Cook observed that <i>oxygen is vitally important</i> (in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis) <i>and there is little evidence that any other therapy is consistently or even occasionally useful</i> [<span>1</span>] and this still holds true more than 60 years later. In the study by Loveys et al. published in this issue [<span>2</span>] the authors address the suggestion that the macrolide antibiotic, azithromycin, may reduce the severity of the acute illness and the prevalence of subsequent respiratory symptoms. They concluded <i>‘</i>There is insufficient evidence to support the use of azithromycin as part of hospital care for infants with bronchiolitis<i>’</i>. While none of the included studies individually found evidence to support the use of macrolides, the initial meta-analysis suggested that it may have a small effect on the length of stay. However, in their sensitivity analysis, which involved removing the studies that reported longer durations of stay than the authors felt were typical for Australasia [<span>2</span>], this apparent effect disappeared.</p><p>Azithromycin joins an extensive list of potential therapies which fell by the wayside when subject to more rigorous testing. These include ‘asthma therapies’ such as β-agonists, corticosteroids, theophylline, anti-cholinergics and a leukotriene antagonist; antibiotics and antivirals and approaches to improve airways clearance including inhaled hypertonic saline and physiotherapy. Despite the evidence, adherence to guidelines is frequently poor as illustrated by the two Australasian studies in which non-macrolide antibiotics were used in 60%–70% of patients. The rationale for using a macrolide antibiotic in these studies was based on having anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and anti-viral effects [<span>2</span>]. Macrolides appear to have a role in downregulating neutrophilic inflammation and, as noted by Loveys et al., the airways inflammation in bronchiolitis is dominated by neutrophils. The use of azithromycin has become ubiquitous, particularly in adult respiratory medicine, largely because of its perceived anti-inflammatory effects (even though, as in these studies, it is used at doses that have antibacterial activity). The downside of using this convenient ‘magic bullet’ so widely is, of course, the fact that macrolides are extremely effective in driving antimicrobial resistance [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Every paediatrician knows what ‘acute bronchiolitis’ looks like when they see it, but there is no universally agreed definition. There is no definitive test for the condition, and the diagnosis is based on a cluster of signs [<span>4</span>]. The studies included in the review allow subjects to have crackles and/or wheeze as a sign of airways obstruction. Crackles are generally observed in young infants (< 6 months) and represent the snapping opening of alveolar units. Secretions in the airways and mucosal oedema are almost certainly responsible for","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":"115 3","pages":"518-520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apa.70384","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Peter Almgren</p><p>Lars Gelander</p><p>Effective management of a child with complex care needs requires a comprehensive perspective that considers the physical, psychological and social factors influencing the child's symptoms and their underlying causes. This holistic approach is especially crucial for children who have frequent referrals or repeated visits to clinics and emergency departments.</p><p>As Lygre et al. [<span>1</span>] describe in the study published in Acta Paediatrica, a broad perspective can easily be lost when a child's symptoms are evaluated individually. They state: “Managing patients with complex health complaints is challenging, because cumulative functional impairment may be overlooked when such complaints are considered individually” [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In the current study, the children suffered from less severe but very common problems but still, a low quality of life, a high school absence and parents being absent from work to a high degree were found. The functional impairment had a considerable impact on their everyday lives. It is well known that this imposes a risk for long-term consequences, for the individuals as well as for society as a whole [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The present study explores common symptoms, such as recurrent abdominal pain and headache, in paediatric patients who have undergone multiple referrals without an established organic diagnosis [<span>1</span>]. These cases highlight a broader challenge within the current medical care system. The management of conditions like paediatric obesity, for example, is often complicated by a high co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders, including autism or attention-deficit disorder [<span>3</span>]. A similar complexity exists in the treatment of paediatric feeding disorders [<span>4</span>]. Moreover, conditions resulting from child abuse, parental stress or emotional or physical neglect can present with symptoms that mimic medical problems like chronic pain [<span>5</span>] or growth disorders [<span>6</span>]. Consequently, managing psychiatric issues in this population often requires a broad, interdisciplinary approach.</p><p>However, what can be stated concerning this population of children, whom we both observe and overlook in our routine clinical practice? How can we effectively approach this group, enhance our understanding, and more critically—how can we best address their needs, prevent suffering, and promote optimal health? In Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, we found that approximately 20% of all children had long-term and/or more extensive contact with the healthcare system, often necessitating coordinated interventions from either one or more of multiple specialists in paediatrics, child psychiatry, child habilitation, and a range of paramedical disciplines [<span>7</span>]. Furthermore, the number of children with special healthcare needs has significantly increased over time [<span>7</span>]. At the time of our article, there were no es
{"title":"Views and Perspectives on Children With Complex Health Complaints and Complex Care Needs","authors":"Peter Almgren, Lars Gelander","doi":"10.1111/apa.70383","DOIUrl":"10.1111/apa.70383","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peter Almgren</p><p>Lars Gelander</p><p>Effective management of a child with complex care needs requires a comprehensive perspective that considers the physical, psychological and social factors influencing the child's symptoms and their underlying causes. This holistic approach is especially crucial for children who have frequent referrals or repeated visits to clinics and emergency departments.</p><p>As Lygre et al. [<span>1</span>] describe in the study published in Acta Paediatrica, a broad perspective can easily be lost when a child's symptoms are evaluated individually. They state: “Managing patients with complex health complaints is challenging, because cumulative functional impairment may be overlooked when such complaints are considered individually” [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In the current study, the children suffered from less severe but very common problems but still, a low quality of life, a high school absence and parents being absent from work to a high degree were found. The functional impairment had a considerable impact on their everyday lives. It is well known that this imposes a risk for long-term consequences, for the individuals as well as for society as a whole [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The present study explores common symptoms, such as recurrent abdominal pain and headache, in paediatric patients who have undergone multiple referrals without an established organic diagnosis [<span>1</span>]. These cases highlight a broader challenge within the current medical care system. The management of conditions like paediatric obesity, for example, is often complicated by a high co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders, including autism or attention-deficit disorder [<span>3</span>]. A similar complexity exists in the treatment of paediatric feeding disorders [<span>4</span>]. Moreover, conditions resulting from child abuse, parental stress or emotional or physical neglect can present with symptoms that mimic medical problems like chronic pain [<span>5</span>] or growth disorders [<span>6</span>]. Consequently, managing psychiatric issues in this population often requires a broad, interdisciplinary approach.</p><p>However, what can be stated concerning this population of children, whom we both observe and overlook in our routine clinical practice? How can we effectively approach this group, enhance our understanding, and more critically—how can we best address their needs, prevent suffering, and promote optimal health? In Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, we found that approximately 20% of all children had long-term and/or more extensive contact with the healthcare system, often necessitating coordinated interventions from either one or more of multiple specialists in paediatrics, child psychiatry, child habilitation, and a range of paramedical disciplines [<span>7</span>]. Furthermore, the number of children with special healthcare needs has significantly increased over time [<span>7</span>]. At the time of our article, there were no es","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":"115 3","pages":"515-517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apa.70383","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}