Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-11-27DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000856
Anne E Kazak, Michele Scialla, Janet A Deatrick, Lamia P Barakat
Objective: The Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) is a three-tier model of family psychosocial risk used to guide intervention approaches in pediatric healthcare settings. Screening all families to determine levels of risk supports equitable care. We review evidence from papers using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), a brief caregiver-report measure of family psychosocial risk with scores that map to the PPPHM, to characterize the distribution of risk. We predict that across study samples the distribution of risk on the PPPHM will be approximately 60% universal (low), 30% targeted (moderate), and 10% clinical (high).
Method: We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Emcare, and PsycInfo for articles that reported PPPHM data using the PAT.
Results: Forty-seven samples from 43 papers were included, reporting on patients with 17 conditions. PPPHM scores were highly consistent with median percentages of 55% universal, 34% targeted, and 11% clinical. There is evidence of higher levels of risk for samples using the Spanish version of the PAT, from weight management programs and with families who have children with autism spectrum disorder.
Conclusions: The data demonstrate consistent patterns of psychosocial risk distributions on the PPPHM and support implementation of universal family psychosocial risk screening, followed by delivery of personalized care based on level of risk. Screening all families promotes health equity in pediatric health care settings by normalizing the importance of understanding psychosocial risk and resiliencies and assuring family input in the delivery of integrated psychosocial care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Pediatric psychosocial preventative health model: Achieving equitable psychosocial care for children and families.","authors":"Anne E Kazak, Michele Scialla, Janet A Deatrick, Lamia P Barakat","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000856","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fsh0000856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) is a three-tier model of family psychosocial risk used to guide intervention approaches in pediatric healthcare settings. Screening all families to determine levels of risk supports equitable care. We review evidence from papers using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), a brief caregiver-report measure of family psychosocial risk with scores that map to the PPPHM, to characterize the distribution of risk. We predict that across study samples the distribution of risk on the PPPHM will be approximately 60% universal (low), 30% targeted (moderate), and 10% clinical (high).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Emcare, and PsycInfo for articles that reported PPPHM data using the PAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven samples from 43 papers were included, reporting on patients with 17 conditions. PPPHM scores were highly consistent with median percentages of 55% universal, 34% targeted, and 11% clinical. There is evidence of higher levels of risk for samples using the Spanish version of the PAT, from weight management programs and with families who have children with autism spectrum disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data demonstrate consistent patterns of psychosocial risk distributions on the PPPHM and support implementation of universal family psychosocial risk screening, followed by delivery of personalized care based on level of risk. Screening all families promotes health equity in pediatric health care settings by normalizing the importance of understanding psychosocial risk and resiliencies and assuring family input in the delivery of integrated psychosocial care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"76-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138447207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reviews the book, Handbook of Positive Youth Development: Advancing Research, Policy, and Practice in Global Contexts edited by Radosveta Dimitrova and Nora Wiium (2021). This volume deals with both the applications and interventions of positive youth development (PYD) in the context of families and other systems in global contexts. Additionally, it advances empirical and theoretical knowledge in PYD, refinement of methodological issues, and measurement and integration of PYD-related knowledge with policy, research, and practice. This book will interest a broad spectrum of readers, including social scientists, students, professionals, policymakers, and practitioners from various disciplines. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
评论《积极青年发展手册》一书:由 Radosveta Dimitrova 和 Nora Wiium 编辑(2021 年)。这本书涉及积极青年发展(PYD)在全球家庭和其他系统中的应用和干预。此外,它还推进了PYD的经验和理论知识、方法论问题的完善以及PYD相关知识与政策、研究和实践的衡量和整合。本书将引起广大读者的兴趣,包括社会科学家、学生、专业人士、政策制定者和各学科从业人员。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Review of Handbook of Positive Youth Development: Advancing Research, Policy, and Practice in Global Contexts.","authors":"Shanu Shukla","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000828","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reviews the book, <i>Handbook of Positive Youth Development: Advancing Research, Policy, and Practice in Global Contexts</i> edited by Radosveta Dimitrova and Nora Wiium (2021). This volume deals with both the applications and interventions of positive youth development (PYD) in the context of families and other systems in global contexts. Additionally, it advances empirical and theoretical knowledge in PYD, refinement of methodological issues, and measurement and integration of PYD-related knowledge with policy, research, and practice. This book will interest a broad spectrum of readers, including social scientists, students, professionals, policymakers, and practitioners from various disciplines. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"130-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140869509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000835
Rheanna Platt, Kiara Alvarez, Monica Guerrero Vasquez, Pilar Bancalari, Jennifer Acosta, Mariana Rincon Caicedo, Sarah Polk, Holly Wilcox
Introduction: Latinx immigrant-origin youth (IOY) have unique risks for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. It has been suggested that these risks should be addressed from an ecological perspective, addressing cultural and family context as well as structural and systemic barriers to prevention. This study sought to explore perspectives of immigrant-origin Latinx adolescents and their caregivers on suicide and its prevention, including the potential impact of stressors specific to immigrant status.
Method: Focus groups were conducted in 2018-2019 with Latinx immigrant-origin caregivers (N = 41, 97.5% female) and adolescents (ages = 14-19, N = 56, 50% female). Participants were recruited from community-based organizations in two different cities. A codebook approach to thematic analysis was used to identify themes, which were subsequently mapped onto levels of the Center for Disease Control's Social-Ecological Framework for Violence Prevention.
Results: Participants identified both contributors to suicidal behavior and potential components of prevention programming across ecological levels. Specific recommendations for suicide prevention included engaging in recreation, parenting education and support, enhancing academic supports for adolescents, and enhancing school-family communication. Structural barriers (e.g., caregiver work schedules) to implementing recommendations were described.
Discussion: Our results highlight the potential role of access to school and community-based supports as public health-oriented suicide prevention strategies and suggest a need to address barriers faced by immigrant families in accessing these supports alongside addressing barriers to mental health treatment. Policies impacting immigrant families' financial stability and increasing the availability of recreational and academic opportunities may promote mental health and prevent suicidal thoughts and behavior among IOY. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
导言:拉丁裔移民青年(IOY)有独特的自杀想法和行为风险。有人建议,应从生态学的角度来应对这些风险,解决文化和家庭背景以及结构性和系统性的预防障碍。本研究旨在探讨移民出身的拉美裔青少年及其照顾者对自杀及其预防的看法,包括移民身份特有的压力因素的潜在影响:2018-2019年,与拉丁裔移民出身的照顾者(人数=41,97.5%为女性)和青少年(年龄=14-19,人数=56,50%为女性)进行了焦点小组讨论。参与者来自两个不同城市的社区组织。我们采用代码簿的主题分析方法来确定主题,然后将这些主题映射到疾病控制中心的暴力预防社会生态框架的各个层面:结果:参与者确定了自杀行为的诱因以及跨生态水平的预防计划的潜在组成部分。预防自杀的具体建议包括参与娱乐活动、父母教育和支持、加强对青少年的学业支持以及加强学校与家庭之间的沟通。此外,还介绍了实施建议的结构性障碍(如照顾者的工作时间安排):我们的研究结果凸显了学校和社区支持作为以公共卫生为导向的自杀预防策略的潜在作用,并表明有必要在解决心理健康治疗障碍的同时,解决移民家庭在获得这些支持时所面临的障碍。影响移民家庭经济稳定性的政策以及增加娱乐和学习机会的政策,可能会促进移民青少年的心理健康,防止他们产生自杀的念头和行为。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Suicide prevention programming across ecological levels: Recommendations from Latinx immigrant origin youth and their parents.","authors":"Rheanna Platt, Kiara Alvarez, Monica Guerrero Vasquez, Pilar Bancalari, Jennifer Acosta, Mariana Rincon Caicedo, Sarah Polk, Holly Wilcox","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000835","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fsh0000835","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Latinx immigrant-origin youth (IOY) have unique risks for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. It has been suggested that these risks should be addressed from an ecological perspective, addressing cultural and family context as well as structural and systemic barriers to prevention. This study sought to explore perspectives of immigrant-origin Latinx adolescents and their caregivers on suicide and its prevention, including the potential impact of stressors specific to immigrant status.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Focus groups were conducted in 2018-2019 with Latinx immigrant-origin caregivers (<i>N</i> = 41, 97.5% female) and adolescents (ages = 14-19, <i>N</i> = 56, 50% female). Participants were recruited from community-based organizations in two different cities. A codebook approach to thematic analysis was used to identify themes, which were subsequently mapped onto levels of the Center for Disease Control's Social-Ecological Framework for Violence Prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified both contributors to suicidal behavior and potential components of prevention programming across ecological levels. Specific recommendations for suicide prevention included engaging in recreation, parenting education and support, enhancing academic supports for adolescents, and enhancing school-family communication. Structural barriers (e.g., caregiver work schedules) to implementing recommendations were described.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results highlight the potential role of access to school and community-based supports as public health-oriented suicide prevention strategies and suggest a need to address barriers faced by immigrant families in accessing these supports alongside addressing barriers to mental health treatment. Policies impacting immigrant families' financial stability and increasing the availability of recreational and academic opportunities may promote mental health and prevent suicidal thoughts and behavior among IOY. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"101-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10891300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10116947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article extends the use of the ecocycle planning framework to describe challenges ahead for the integrated care and Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA). The authors make the case that to remain agile and adaptable, there are contextual, ecological, and moral challenges that integrated care and CFHA should keep in the forefront as they navigate the future of an inequitable health care system that is morphing at a rapid pace. These influences include but are not limited to challenges of social determinants of health, artificial intelligence, generational differences in technology among older and younger populations, the moral issue of poverty, challenges to retain an integrated care workforce, and rethinking development of evidence-based supported treatments for integrated care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
本文扩展了生态循环规划框架的使用范围,以描述综合医疗和合作家庭医疗协会(CFHA)面临的挑战。作者认为,为了保持敏捷性和适应性,综合医疗和协作式家庭医疗保健协会在驾驭不公平的医疗保健系统的未来时,应将背景、生态和道德方面的挑战放在首位。这些影响因素包括但不限于健康的社会决定因素、人工智能、老年人群和年轻人群在技术方面的代际差异、贫困的道德问题、留住综合医疗队伍的挑战,以及对综合医疗循证支持疗法发展的反思。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Contemplating on the end of integrated care-part II: Living the questions to foster adaptability.","authors":"Deepu George, Parinda Khatri","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article extends the use of the ecocycle planning framework to describe challenges ahead for the integrated care and Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA). The authors make the case that to remain agile and adaptable, there are contextual, ecological, and moral challenges that integrated care and CFHA should keep in the forefront as they navigate the future of an inequitable health care system that is morphing at a rapid pace. These influences include but are not limited to challenges of social determinants of health, artificial intelligence, generational differences in technology among older and younger populations, the moral issue of poverty, challenges to retain an integrated care workforce, and rethinking development of evidence-based supported treatments for integrated care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew M Davis, Marie E Heffernan, Lucy A Bilaver, Lauren S Wakschlag, Neil Jordan, Justin D Smith
Background: Strength of evidence is key to advancing children's mental health care but may be inadequate for driving practice change. The Designing for Accelerated Translation (DART) framework proposes a multifaceted approach: pace of implementation as a function of evidence of effectiveness, demand for the intervention, sum of risks, and costs. To inform empirical applications of DART, we solicited caregiver preferences on key elements.
Method: In March-April 2022, we fielded a population-representative online survey in Illinois households (caregivers N = 1,326) with ≥1 child <8 years old. Six hypothetical scenarios based on the DART framework were used to elucidate caregivers' preferences on a 0-10 scale (0 = never; 10 = as soon as possible) for pace of implementation of a family-based program to address mental health concerns.
Results: Caregivers' pace preference scores varied significantly for each scenario. The highest mean score (7.28, 95% confidence interval [95% CI: 7.06, 7.50]) was for a scenario in which the child's provider thinks the program would be helpful (effectiveness) and the caregiver believes the program is needed (demand). In contrast, the lowest mean score (5.13, 95% CI [4.91, 5.36]) was for a scenario in which online information implies the program would be helpful (effectiveness) and the parent is concerned about the program's financial costs (cost). Caregivers' pace preference scores did not vary consistently by sociodemographic factors.
Conclusion: In this empirical exploration of the DART framework, factors such as demand, cost, and risk, in combination with evidence of effectiveness, may influence caregivers' preferred pace of implementation for children's mental health interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
背景:证据的力量是推动儿童心理健康护理的关键,但可能不足以推动实践的改变。加速转化设计(DART)框架提出了一种多方面的方法:将实施速度作为有效性证据、干预需求、风险总和及成本的函数。为了给 DART 的实证应用提供信息,我们征求了护理人员对关键要素的偏好:2022年3月至4月,我们在伊利诺伊州有≥1名儿童的家庭(照顾者人数=1,326)中进行了一次具有人口代表性的在线调查:在每种情况下,照顾者的步调偏好得分差异很大。平均得分最高(7.28,95% 置信区间[95% CI:7.06, 7.50])的情景是:儿童的养育者认为该计划会有帮助(有效性),而照顾者认为该计划是需要的(需求)。相比之下,平均得分最低(5.13,95% CI [4.91,5.36])的情景是:在线信息暗示该计划会有帮助(有效性),而家长担心该计划的经济成本(成本)。照顾者的步调偏好得分并不因社会人口因素的不同而一致:在这一 DART 框架的实证探索中,需求、成本和风险等因素与有效性证据相结合,可能会影响照顾者对儿童心理健康干预措施实施进度的偏好。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Potential parental determinants of the pace of evidence-based practice change in children's mental health care.","authors":"Matthew M Davis, Marie E Heffernan, Lucy A Bilaver, Lauren S Wakschlag, Neil Jordan, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000878","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strength of evidence is key to advancing children's mental health care but may be inadequate for driving practice change. The Designing for Accelerated Translation (DART) framework proposes a multifaceted approach: pace of implementation as a function of evidence of effectiveness, demand for the intervention, sum of risks, and costs. To inform empirical applications of DART, we solicited caregiver preferences on key elements.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In March-April 2022, we fielded a population-representative online survey in Illinois households (caregivers N = 1,326) with ≥1 child <8 years old. Six hypothetical scenarios based on the DART framework were used to elucidate caregivers' preferences on a 0-10 scale (0 = never; 10 = as soon as possible) for pace of implementation of a family-based program to address mental health concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers' pace preference scores varied significantly for each scenario. The highest mean score (7.28, 95% confidence interval [95% CI: 7.06, 7.50]) was for a scenario in which the child's provider thinks the program would be helpful (effectiveness) and the caregiver believes the program is needed (demand). In contrast, the lowest mean score (5.13, 95% CI [4.91, 5.36]) was for a scenario in which online information implies the program would be helpful (effectiveness) and the parent is concerned about the program's financial costs (cost). Caregivers' pace preference scores did not vary consistently by sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this empirical exploration of the DART framework, factors such as demand, cost, and risk, in combination with evidence of effectiveness, may influence caregivers' preferred pace of implementation for children's mental health interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"68-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140857089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000832
Megan Ferber, Leah M Hecht, Kellie M Martens, Aaron Hamann, Arthur M Carlin, Lisa R Miller-Matero
Introduction: This study tested for differences based on relationship status at the time of surgery in baseline body mass index (BMI), weight loss outcomes (change in BMI [ΔBMI], percent total weight loss [%TWL], percent excess weight loss [%EWL]), and rates of successful weight loss (defined as ≥ 50%EWL) up to 4-year postbariatric surgery.
Method: Data came from a secondary analysis of patients (N = 492) who were up to 4-year postsurgery and completed a presurgical psychological evaluation and postsurgical survey.
Results: Sixty-nine percent of participants were patients in committed relationships and 31% were single/divorced/widowed patients. Single patients had higher presurgical BMIs than those who were partnered (t = 2.28, p = .02). There were no differences between those who were partnered and singles regarding ΔBMI and %TWL, although singles had smaller %EWL (t = -2.08, p = .04), which became nonsignificant after controlling for covariates. Most participants had successful weight loss (76.8%); however, this was not related to romantic relationship status.
Discussion: The results suggest those who were partnered undergo surgery at better-starting weights than singles and maintain this advantage in the long term. Providers working with patients considering bariatric surgery could inquire about how their romantic and social relationships play a part in their decision-making process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Examining differences in long-term weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery: The role of romantic relationship status.","authors":"Megan Ferber, Leah M Hecht, Kellie M Martens, Aaron Hamann, Arthur M Carlin, Lisa R Miller-Matero","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000832","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fsh0000832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study tested for differences based on relationship status at the time of surgery in baseline body mass index (BMI), weight loss outcomes (change in BMI [ΔBMI], percent total weight loss [%TWL], percent excess weight loss [%EWL]), and rates of successful weight loss (defined as ≥ 50%EWL) up to 4-year postbariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data came from a secondary analysis of patients (<i>N</i> = 492) who were up to 4-year postsurgery and completed a presurgical psychological evaluation and postsurgical survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine percent of participants were patients in committed relationships and 31% were single/divorced/widowed patients. Single patients had higher presurgical BMIs than those who were partnered (<i>t</i> = 2.28, <i>p</i> = .02). There were no differences between those who were partnered and singles regarding ΔBMI and %TWL, although singles had smaller %EWL (<i>t</i> = -2.08, <i>p</i> = .04), which became nonsignificant after controlling for covariates. Most participants had successful weight loss (76.8%); however, this was not related to romantic relationship status.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results suggest those who were partnered undergo surgery at better-starting weights than singles and maintain this advantage in the long term. Providers working with patients considering bariatric surgery could inquire about how their romantic and social relationships play a part in their decision-making process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"122-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10435619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren S Wakschlag, Matthew M Davis, Justin D Smith
Introduction: Primary care is at the forefront of addressing the pediatric mental health (MH) crisis due to its broad reach to young children and prevention and health promotion orientation. However, the promise of the delivery system for population impact remains unrealized due to several barriers, including pragmatic screening, decisional uncertainty, and limited access to evidence-based services.
Method: This article lays the conceptual foundations for the articles in this Special Section on Mental Health, Earlier in Pediatric Primary Care, which all apply a translational mindset to proposed strategies and solutions to overcome the barriers that have limited the potential of pediatric primary care for improving the MH and wellbeing of all children.
Results: Valid, pragmatic, transdiagnostic, developmentally-based screening measures to identify children at heightened risk are needed. Risk screening for MH problems should assess and empirically weight socioecological risk and protective factors, as well as the child's own assets for resilience to determine probabilistic risk. Pediatric clinicians require clear clinical cutoffs and guidelines for action when risk for MH problems is identified.
Discussion: These strategies-a developmentally-based screener with associated risk calculator that offers clear guidance to pediatric clinicians-address decisional uncertainty regarding when to worry and when to act. The communication of probabilistic risk requires additional client-centered communication skills to overcome different types of biases (e.g., implicit, benevolent, and cognitive) that contribute to MH inequities and decisional uncertainty in acting on identified risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
导言:初级医疗服务因其对幼儿的广泛覆盖以及预防和促进健康的导向,在应对儿科心理健康(MH)危机方面处于领先地位。然而,由于一些障碍,包括实用性筛查、决策的不确定性以及获得循证服务的途径有限,该服务体系对人群产生影响的前景仍未实现:这篇文章为本期心理健康专栏的文章奠定了概念基础,这些文章都运用转化思维提出了策略和解决方案,以克服限制儿科初级保健在改善所有儿童的心理健康和福祉方面的潜力的障碍:结果:需要有效、实用、跨诊断、基于发展的筛查措施来识别高风险儿童。心理健康问题的风险筛查应评估社会生态风险和保护因素以及儿童自身的抗逆能力,并根据经验对这些因素进行加权,以确定概率风险。儿科临床医生需要明确的临床分界线和行动指南,以便在发现精神健康问题风险时采取行动:这些策略--以发育为基础的筛查器和相关的风险计算器--为儿科临床医生提供了明确的指导,解决了何时担心和何时行动的决策不确定性问题。概率风险的沟通需要更多的以客户为中心的沟通技巧,以克服不同类型的偏见(如隐性偏见、善意偏见和认知偏见),这些偏见会造成心理健康方面的不平等,以及在对已识别的风险采取行动时的决策不确定性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A vision for implementing equitable early mental health and resilience support in pediatric primary care: A transdiagnostic, developmental approach.","authors":"Lauren S Wakschlag, Matthew M Davis, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000884","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary care is at the forefront of addressing the pediatric mental health (MH) crisis due to its broad reach to young children and prevention and health promotion orientation. However, the promise of the delivery system for population impact remains unrealized due to several barriers, including pragmatic screening, decisional uncertainty, and limited access to evidence-based services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article lays the conceptual foundations for the articles in this Special Section on Mental Health, Earlier in Pediatric Primary Care, which all apply a translational mindset to proposed strategies and solutions to overcome the barriers that have limited the potential of pediatric primary care for improving the MH and wellbeing of all children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Valid, pragmatic, transdiagnostic, developmentally-based screening measures to identify children at heightened risk are needed. Risk screening for MH problems should assess and empirically weight socioecological risk and protective factors, as well as the child's own assets for resilience to determine probabilistic risk. Pediatric clinicians require clear clinical cutoffs and guidelines for action when risk for MH problems is identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These strategies-a developmentally-based screener with associated risk calculator that offers clear guidance to pediatric clinicians-address decisional uncertainty regarding when to worry and when to act. The communication of probabilistic risk requires additional client-centered communication skills to overcome different types of biases (e.g., implicit, benevolent, and cognitive) that contribute to MH inequities and decisional uncertainty in acting on identified risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"6-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140861680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The author describes how she has earnestly struggled to find her fit in providing mental health services to Hispanic/Latino clients and the Latino communities that she belongs to. She wonders, if no one belongs, then who stands up for historically marginalized Latino communities? Personal and systemic biases and arbitrary criteria for being enough to serve Latino patients hurt providers and clients alike. Her work reminds her of the need to charge against stereotyping and racism to meet patients' needs regardless of skin color or linguistic abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
作者描述了她是如何在为拉美裔客户和她所属的拉美裔社区提供心理健康服务的过程中,认真努力地寻找自己的位置。她想知道,如果没有人属于自己,那么谁来为历史上被边缘化的拉美裔社区撑腰?个人和系统性的偏见以及任意制定的足以为拉丁裔病人提供服务的标准,对服务提供者和客户都造成了伤害。她的工作提醒她,必须反对陈规定型观念和种族主义,以满足患者的需求,而不论其肤色或语言能力如何。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"You belong.","authors":"Victoria A Torres, Luz M Garcini, Eliot J Lopez","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000821","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fsh0000821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author describes how she has earnestly struggled to find her fit in providing mental health services to Hispanic/Latino clients and the Latino communities that she belongs to. She wonders, <i>if no one belongs, then who stands up for historically marginalized Latino communities?</i> Personal and systemic biases and arbitrary criteria for being enough to serve Latino patients hurt providers and clients alike. Her work reminds her of the need to charge against stereotyping and racism to meet patients' needs regardless of skin color or linguistic abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"137-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140871418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-08-17DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000840
Nicholas David W Smith, Kevin R Lewis, Marissa A Feldman
Introduction: Depression and anxiety among youth with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with poor diabetes management. Further guidance regarding psychosocial screening measures would benefit pediatric integrated care clinics. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine whether screening for anxiety, assessing caregiver reports, and screening children 12 years old and younger could identify a larger percentage of youth who may benefit from behavioral health support compared to the standard approach of only screening youth 13 and older for depression.
Method: Sixty-five youth 8-17 years old with T1D (N = 65; M = 13.2 years; 55.4% females) and their caregivers (75% mothers) completed validated self-report and proxy-report depression and anxiety screeners during routine clinic visits between 2019 and 2021. Twenty-seven youth aged 13-17 also completed a measure of diabetes-related distress.
Results: The standard approach of screening youth aged 13-17 for depression via self-report identified 25.6% of participants, whereas screening youth ages 8-17 for depression and anxiety via self- and proxy-reports identified 47.7%. Screening for depression/anxiety identified unique portions of youth independent of diabetes distress.
Discussion: Utilizing anxiety and proxy-report measures may identify youth likely to benefit from behavioral health support who are not identified when only a self-report depression measure is used in screening. Research should evaluate whether utilizing multiple measures and screening children under 13 years old improve detection and connection to care for youth experiencing difficulty managing diabetes. Early identification and intervention could subsequently mitigate the negative impacts of social-emotional difficulties on diabetes management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Benefits of expanding behavioral health screening in a pediatric diabetes clinic to include anxiety and caregiver reports in youth 12 years and younger.","authors":"Nicholas David W Smith, Kevin R Lewis, Marissa A Feldman","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000840","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fsh0000840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression and anxiety among youth with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with poor diabetes management. Further guidance regarding psychosocial screening measures would benefit pediatric integrated care clinics. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine whether screening for anxiety, assessing caregiver reports, and screening children 12 years old and younger could identify a larger percentage of youth who may benefit from behavioral health support compared to the standard approach of only screening youth 13 and older for depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-five youth 8-17 years old with T1D (<i>N</i> = 65; <i>M</i> = 13.2 years; 55.4% females) and their caregivers (75% mothers) completed validated self-report and proxy-report depression and anxiety screeners during routine clinic visits between 2019 and 2021. Twenty-seven youth aged 13-17 also completed a measure of diabetes-related distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The standard approach of screening youth aged 13-17 for depression via self-report identified 25.6% of participants, whereas screening youth ages 8-17 for depression and anxiety via self- and proxy-reports identified 47.7%. Screening for depression/anxiety identified unique portions of youth independent of diabetes distress.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Utilizing anxiety and proxy-report measures may identify youth likely to benefit from behavioral health support who are not identified when only a self-report depression measure is used in screening. Research should evaluate whether utilizing multiple measures and screening children under 13 years old improve detection and connection to care for youth experiencing difficulty managing diabetes. Early identification and intervention could subsequently mitigate the negative impacts of social-emotional difficulties on diabetes management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10017213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-11-13DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000852
Allison J Carroll, Ashley A Knapp, Juan A Villamar, Nivedita Mohanty, Elaine Coldren, Tania Hossain, Dhanya Limaye, Daniel Mendoza, Mark Minier, Michael Sethi, C Hendricks Brown, Patricia D Franklin, Matthew M Davis, Lauren S Wakschlag, Justin D Smith
Background: Social-emotional risk for subsequent behavioral health problems can be identified at toddler age, a period where prevention has a heightened impact. This study aimed to meaningfully engage pediatric clinicians, given the emphasis on health promotion and broad reach of primary care, to prepare an Implementation Research Logic Model to guide the implementation of a screening and referral process for toddlers with elevated social-emotional risk.
Method: Using an adaptation of a previously published community partner engagement method, six pediatricians from community health centers (CHCs) comprised a Clinical Partner Work Group. The group was engaged in identifying determinants (barriers/facilitators), selecting and specifying strategies, strategy-determinant matching, a modified Delphi approach for strategy prioritization, and user-centered design methods. The data gathered from individual interviews, two group sessions, and a follow-up survey resulted in a completed Implementation Research Logic Model.
Results: The Clinical Partner Work Group identified 16 determinants, including barriers (e.g., patient access to electronic devices) and facilitators (e.g., clinician buy-in). They then selected and specified 14 strategies, which were prioritized based on ratings of feasibility, effectiveness, and priority. The highest-rated strategies (e.g., integration of the screener into the electronic health record) provided coverage of all identified barriers and comprised the primary implementation strategy "package" to be used and tested.
Conclusions: Clinical partners provided important context and insights for implementation strategy selection and specification to support the implementation of social-emotional risk screening and referral in pediatric primary care. The methodology described herein can improve partner engagement in implementation efforts and increase the likelihood of success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Engaging primary care clinicians in the selection of implementation strategies for toddler social-emotional health promotion in community health centers.","authors":"Allison J Carroll, Ashley A Knapp, Juan A Villamar, Nivedita Mohanty, Elaine Coldren, Tania Hossain, Dhanya Limaye, Daniel Mendoza, Mark Minier, Michael Sethi, C Hendricks Brown, Patricia D Franklin, Matthew M Davis, Lauren S Wakschlag, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000852","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fsh0000852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social-emotional risk for subsequent behavioral health problems can be identified at toddler age, a period where prevention has a heightened impact. This study aimed to meaningfully engage pediatric clinicians, given the emphasis on health promotion and broad reach of primary care, to prepare an Implementation Research Logic Model to guide the implementation of a screening and referral process for toddlers with elevated social-emotional risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an adaptation of a previously published community partner engagement method, six pediatricians from community health centers (CHCs) comprised a Clinical Partner Work Group. The group was engaged in identifying determinants (barriers/facilitators), selecting and specifying strategies, strategy-determinant matching, a modified Delphi approach for strategy prioritization, and user-centered design methods. The data gathered from individual interviews, two group sessions, and a follow-up survey resulted in a completed Implementation Research Logic Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Clinical Partner Work Group identified 16 determinants, including barriers (e.g., patient access to electronic devices) and facilitators (e.g., clinician buy-in). They then selected and specified 14 strategies, which were prioritized based on ratings of feasibility, effectiveness, and priority. The highest-rated strategies (e.g., integration of the screener into the electronic health record) provided coverage of all identified barriers and comprised the primary implementation strategy \"package\" to be used and tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical partners provided important context and insights for implementation strategy selection and specification to support the implementation of social-emotional risk screening and referral in pediatric primary care. The methodology described herein can improve partner engagement in implementation efforts and increase the likelihood of success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"50-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090018/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92157420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}