首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology最新文献

英文 中文
Global prevalence and characteristics of infections and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with cirrhosis: a prospective cohort study for the CLEARED Consortium. 肝硬化住院患者感染的全球流行率和特征及临床结果:CLEARED 联合会的前瞻性队列研究。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00224-3
Zhujun Cao, Florence Wong, Ashok K Choudhury, Patrick S Kamath, Mark Topazian, Aldo Torre, Peter C Hayes, Jacob George, Ramazan Idilman, Wai-Kay Seto, Hailemichael Desalegn, Mario Reis Alvares-da-Silva, Brian J Bush, Leroy R Thacker, Qing Xie, Jasmohan S Bajaj
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infections have a poor prognosis in inpatients with cirrhosis. We aimed to determine regional variations in infections and their association with clinical outcomes in a global cohort of inpatients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study initiated by the CLEARED Consortium, we enrolled adults (aged >18 years) with cirrhosis who were non-electively admitted to 98 hospitals from 26 countries or regions across six continents between Nov 5, 2021, and Dec 10, 2022. Data at admission, during hospitalisation, and for 30 days after discharge were collected through patient reports and chart reviews. Collected data included demographics; country and country income level per World Bank classifications (high-income countries [HICs], upper-middle-income countries [UMICs], and low-income or lower-middle-income countries [L-LMICs]); comorbidities; characteristics related to cirrhosis and the infections, including types, culture results, and drug resistance profile; antibiotic use; and disease course while hospitalised and for 30 days post-discharge. The primary outcome was in-hospital death or hospice referral in those with versus those without an admission infection (defined by the presence of infection on or within 48 h of admission). Multivariable log-binomial regression for in-hospital death or hospice referral was performed to identify risk factors.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 4550 patients screened, 4238 patients (mean age 56·1 years [SD 13·3]; 2711 [64·0%] male and 1527 [36·0%] female) with complete data were enrolled. 1351 (31·9%) had admission infections. A higher proportion of patients in L-LMICs had infections (318 [41·7%] of 762 vs 444 [58·3%] without infection) than in UMICs (588 [30·6%] of 1922 vs 1334 [69·4%]) or HICs (445 [28·6%] of 1554 vs 1109 [71·4%]). Patients with admission infections had worse severity of cirrhosis and were more likely to have had an infection or been hospitalised in the preceding 6 months. The most common specific infection types were spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (391 [28·9%] of 1351), pneumonia (233 [17·2%]), and urinary tract infections (193 [14·3%]). 549 (40·6%) patients were culture-positive for bacterial or fungal infections, with the lowest culture-positive rates in Africa and mainland China. Most of the isolated organisms were Gram-negative (345 [63%] of 549), then Gram-positive (157 [29%]), and then fungi or mixed (47 [9%]), with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus spp being the top three isolated pathogens. The overall rate of drug resistance was 40% (220 of 549 with positive cultures), being highest in UMICs. The most used empirical antimicrobials were third-generation cephalosporins (453 [37%] of 1241), followed by the broad-spectrum β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors (289 [23%]). De-escalation was observed in 62 (20%) of 304 patients who had their antibiotics changed. Patients with versus without admiss
背景:肝硬化住院患者感染后预后不良。我们旨在确定全球肝硬化住院患者队列中感染的地区差异及其与临床结果的关系:在这项由 CLEARED 联合会发起的前瞻性队列研究中,我们招募了 2021 年 11 月 5 日至 2022 年 12 月 10 日期间在六大洲 26 个国家或地区的 98 家医院非选择性住院的成年肝硬化患者(年龄大于 18 岁)。通过患者报告和病历审查收集入院时、住院期间和出院后 30 天内的数据。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征;根据世界银行的分类,国家和国家收入水平(高收入国家 [HICs]、中高收入国家 [UMICs] 和低收入或中低收入国家 [L-LMICs]);合并症;肝硬化和感染的相关特征,包括类型、培养结果和耐药性概况;抗生素使用情况;住院期间和出院后 30 天的病程。主要结果是入院感染与未感染(入院时或入院后48小时内感染)患者的院内死亡或临终关怀转诊情况。为确定风险因素,对院内死亡或临终关怀转诊进行了多变量对数二叉回归:在4550名接受筛查的患者中,4238名患者(平均年龄56-1岁[SD 13-3];2711名[64-0%]男性和1527名[36-0%]女性)的数据完整。1351人(31-9%)入院时受到感染。L-LMICs 中感染患者的比例(762 例中的 318 例 [41-7%] vs 444 例 [58-3%] 未感染)高于 UMICs(1922 例中的 588 例 [30-6%] vs 1334 例 [69-4%])或 HICs(1554 例中的 445 例 [28-6%] vs 1109 例 [71-4%])。入院感染患者的肝硬化严重程度更严重,并且更有可能在前 6 个月中感染过或住院治疗过。最常见的特殊感染类型是自发性细菌性腹膜炎(1351 例中有 391 例 [28-9%])、肺炎(233 例 [17-2%])和尿路感染(193 例 [14-3%])。549例(40-6%)患者的细菌或真菌感染培养呈阳性,其中非洲和中国大陆的培养阳性率最低。大多数分离出的病原体是革兰氏阴性菌(549 例中有 345 例 [63%]),然后是革兰氏阳性菌(157 例 [29%]),然后是真菌或混合菌(47 例 [9%]),大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和肠球菌是前三位分离出的病原体。总体耐药率为 40%(549 例培养阳性病例中的 220 例),其中尤以地中海贫血中心最高。使用最多的经验性抗菌药物是第三代头孢菌素(1241 例中有 453 例[37%]),其次是广谱β-内酰胺类和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(289 例[23%])。在更换抗生素的 304 名患者中,有 62 人(20%)被观察到降级。入院感染与非入院感染患者的院内死亡或临终关怀转院率较高(1351 例中的 299 例 [22-1%] vs 2887 例中的 232 例 [8-0%];p解释:在 CLEARED 联合会的肝硬化住院患者队列中,不同地区的感染率和感染类型、致病菌和培养阳性率存在很大差异,感染与较高的死亡风险相关。培养阳性率较低,而培养阳性率可指导抗生素的合理使用。从全球视角考虑感染、耐药性和资源的地区差异,有助于减轻负担和结果的差异:美国退伍军人事务部、里士满退伍军人研究所、中国国家自然科学基金委员会、上海市新星计划、巴西国家科技发展委员会和上海市临床重点专科。
{"title":"Global prevalence and characteristics of infections and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with cirrhosis: a prospective cohort study for the CLEARED Consortium.","authors":"Zhujun Cao, Florence Wong, Ashok K Choudhury, Patrick S Kamath, Mark Topazian, Aldo Torre, Peter C Hayes, Jacob George, Ramazan Idilman, Wai-Kay Seto, Hailemichael Desalegn, Mario Reis Alvares-da-Silva, Brian J Bush, Leroy R Thacker, Qing Xie, Jasmohan S Bajaj","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00224-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00224-3","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Infections have a poor prognosis in inpatients with cirrhosis. We aimed to determine regional variations in infections and their association with clinical outcomes in a global cohort of inpatients with cirrhosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this prospective cohort study initiated by the CLEARED Consortium, we enrolled adults (aged &gt;18 years) with cirrhosis who were non-electively admitted to 98 hospitals from 26 countries or regions across six continents between Nov 5, 2021, and Dec 10, 2022. Data at admission, during hospitalisation, and for 30 days after discharge were collected through patient reports and chart reviews. Collected data included demographics; country and country income level per World Bank classifications (high-income countries [HICs], upper-middle-income countries [UMICs], and low-income or lower-middle-income countries [L-LMICs]); comorbidities; characteristics related to cirrhosis and the infections, including types, culture results, and drug resistance profile; antibiotic use; and disease course while hospitalised and for 30 days post-discharge. The primary outcome was in-hospital death or hospice referral in those with versus those without an admission infection (defined by the presence of infection on or within 48 h of admission). Multivariable log-binomial regression for in-hospital death or hospice referral was performed to identify risk factors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 4550 patients screened, 4238 patients (mean age 56·1 years [SD 13·3]; 2711 [64·0%] male and 1527 [36·0%] female) with complete data were enrolled. 1351 (31·9%) had admission infections. A higher proportion of patients in L-LMICs had infections (318 [41·7%] of 762 vs 444 [58·3%] without infection) than in UMICs (588 [30·6%] of 1922 vs 1334 [69·4%]) or HICs (445 [28·6%] of 1554 vs 1109 [71·4%]). Patients with admission infections had worse severity of cirrhosis and were more likely to have had an infection or been hospitalised in the preceding 6 months. The most common specific infection types were spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (391 [28·9%] of 1351), pneumonia (233 [17·2%]), and urinary tract infections (193 [14·3%]). 549 (40·6%) patients were culture-positive for bacterial or fungal infections, with the lowest culture-positive rates in Africa and mainland China. Most of the isolated organisms were Gram-negative (345 [63%] of 549), then Gram-positive (157 [29%]), and then fungi or mixed (47 [9%]), with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus spp being the top three isolated pathogens. The overall rate of drug resistance was 40% (220 of 549 with positive cultures), being highest in UMICs. The most used empirical antimicrobials were third-generation cephalosporins (453 [37%] of 1241), followed by the broad-spectrum β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors (289 [23%]). De-escalation was observed in 62 (20%) of 304 patients who had their antibiotics changed. Patients with versus without admiss","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best buy interventions to address the burden of steatotic liver disease. 解决脂肪肝负担的最佳干预措施。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00220-6
Jeffrey V Lazarus, Henry E Mark, Naim Alkhouri, Luis Antonio Díaz, Ajay Duseja, C Wendy Spearman, Maja Thiele, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Zobair M Younossi
{"title":"Best buy interventions to address the burden of steatotic liver disease.","authors":"Jeffrey V Lazarus, Henry E Mark, Naim Alkhouri, Luis Antonio Díaz, Ajay Duseja, C Wendy Spearman, Maja Thiele, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Zobair M Younossi","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00220-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00220-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intensified versus standard dose infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (PREDICT-UC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 类固醇难治性急性重度溃疡性结肠炎的强化与标准剂量英夫利西单抗诱导疗法(PREDICT-UC):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00200-0
Matthew C Choy, Christopher F D Li Wai Suen, Danny Con, Kristy Boyd, Raquel Pena, Kathryn Burrell, Ourania Rosella, David Proud, Richard Brouwer, Alexandra Gorelik, Danny Liew, William R Connell, Emily K Wright, Kirstin M Taylor, Aviv Pudipeddi, Michelle Sawers, Britt Christensen, Watson Ng, Jakob Begun, Graham Radford-Smith, Mayur Garg, Neal Martin, Daniel R van Langenberg, Nik S Ding, Lauren Beswick, Rupert W Leong, Miles P Sparrow, Peter De Cruz
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal dosing strategy for infliximab in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unknown. We compared intensified and standard dose infliximab rescue strategies and explored maintenance therapies following infliximab induction in ASUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older from 13 Australian tertiary hospitals with intravenous steroid-refractory ASUC were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab or 5 mg/kg infliximab (randomisation 1). Block randomisation was used and stratified by history of thiopurine exposure and study site, with allocation concealment maintained via computer-generated randomisation. Patients in the 10 mg/kg group (intensified induction strategy [IIS]) received a second dose at day 7 or earlier at the time of non-response; all patients in the 5 mg/kg group were re-randomised between day 3 and day 7 (1:1; randomisation 2) to a standard induction strategy (SIS) or accelerated induction strategy (AIS), resulting in three induction groups. Patients in the SIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with an extra 5 mg/kg dose between day 3 and day 7 if no response. Patients in the AIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 1, and 3, with the week 1 dose increased to 10 mg/kg and given between day 3 and day 7 if no response. The primary outcome was clinical response by day 7 (reduction in Lichtiger score to <10 with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline, improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day). Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes to day 7 and exploratory outcomes compared induction regimens until month 3. From month 3, maintenance therapy was selected based on treatment experience, with use of thiopurine monotherapy, combination infliximab and thiopurine, or infliximab monotherapy, with follow-up as a cohort study up to month 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02770040, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between July 20, 2016, and Sept 24, 2021, 138 patients were randomly assigned (63 [46%] female and 75 [54%] male); 46 received a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab and 92 received 5 mg/kg infliximab. After randomisation 1, we observed no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response by day 7 between the 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups (30 [65%] of 46 vs 56 [61%] of 92, p=0·62; risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine treatment history, 1·06 [95% CI 0·94-1·20], p=0·32). We found no significant differences in secondary endpoints including time to clinical response or change in Lichtiger score from baseline to day 7. Two patients who received 10 mg/kg infliximab underwent colectomy in the first 7 days compared with no patients in the 5 mg/kg group (p=0·21). Three serious adverse events occurred in three pa
背景:英夫利西单抗治疗类固醇难治性急性重度溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)的最佳剂量策略尚不清楚。我们比较了加强剂量和标准剂量英夫利西单抗救治策略,并探讨了英夫利西单抗诱导治疗急性重症溃疡性结肠炎后的维持疗法:在这项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验中,来自澳大利亚13家三级医院的18岁或18岁以上静脉注射类固醇难治性ASUC患者被随机分配(1:2)接受首剂10 mg/kg 英夫利西单抗或5 mg/kg 英夫利西单抗(随机化1)。采用整群随机分配法,并根据硫嘌呤暴露史和研究地点进行分层,通过计算机生成的随机码进行分配隐藏。10毫克/千克组(强化诱导策略[IIS])的患者在第7天或无应答时接受第二次给药;5毫克/千克组的所有患者在第3天和第7天之间(1:1;随机化2)被重新随机分配到标准诱导策略(SIS)或加速诱导策略(AIS),从而产生了三个诱导组。SIS组患者在第0周、第2周和第6周接受5毫克/千克英夫利西单抗治疗,如果没有反应,可在第3天和第7天之间额外服用5毫克/千克英夫利西单抗。AIS组患者在第0、1和3周接受5毫克/千克英夫利昔单抗治疗,如果没有反应,第1周的剂量将增加到10毫克/千克,并在第3天和第7天之间给药。主要结果是第7天时的临床反应(Lichtiger评分下降至结果:2016年7月20日至2021年9月24日期间,138名患者被随机分配(其中女性63人[46%],男性75人[54%]);46人首次接受10毫克/千克英夫利昔单抗,92人接受5毫克/千克英夫利昔单抗。随机分配1后,我们观察到10毫克/千克组和5毫克/千克组在第7天出现临床反应的患者比例无显著差异(46人中的30人[65%] vs 92人中的56人[61%],P=0-62;根据硫嘌呤治疗史调整后的风险比为1-06 [95% CI 0-94-1-20],P=0-32)。我们在次要终点(包括临床反应时间或从基线到第 7 天的 Lichtiger 评分变化)上未发现明显差异。有两名接受10毫克/千克英夫利西单抗治疗的患者在前7天接受了结肠切除术,而5毫克/千克组没有患者接受结肠切除术(P=0-21)。10毫克/千克组和5毫克/千克组均有3名患者发生了3次严重不良事件。随机分组 2 后,第 14 天有临床反应的患者比例(IIS 组 46 人中有 34 人[74%],AIS 组 48 人中有 35 人[73%],SIS 组 44 人中有 30 人[68%],P=0-81),第 3 个月有临床缓解的患者比例(23 人[50%],25 人[52%],21 人[48%],P=0-92)、第 3 个月时的无类固醇缓解率(19 [41%]、20 [42%]、18 [41%],P=1-0)、第 3 个月时的内镜缓解率(21 [46%]、22 [46%]、21 [48%],P=0-98)和第 3 个月时的结肠切除术(45 例中有 3 [7%]、47 例中有 9 [19%]、43 例中有 5 [12%],P=0-20)在组间无显著差异。从第8天到第3个月,至少发生一次可能与英夫利昔单抗有关的感染性不良事件的患者比例为:IIS组46人中2人(4%),AIS组48人中8人(17%),SIS组44人中8人(18%)(P=0-082)。研究中无死亡病例:英夫利西单抗是一种安全有效的ASUC抢救疗法。在类固醇难治性ASUC中,首剂10毫克/千克英夫利昔单抗在第7天获得临床应答方面并不优于5毫克/千克英夫利昔单抗。强化、加速和标准诱导方案在第14天时的临床反应、第3个月时的缓解率或结肠切除率方面没有显著差异:澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会、澳大利亚胃肠病学会、Gandel Philanthropy、澳大利亚研究生奖、Janssen-Cilag。
{"title":"Intensified versus standard dose infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (PREDICT-UC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Matthew C Choy, Christopher F D Li Wai Suen, Danny Con, Kristy Boyd, Raquel Pena, Kathryn Burrell, Ourania Rosella, David Proud, Richard Brouwer, Alexandra Gorelik, Danny Liew, William R Connell, Emily K Wright, Kirstin M Taylor, Aviv Pudipeddi, Michelle Sawers, Britt Christensen, Watson Ng, Jakob Begun, Graham Radford-Smith, Mayur Garg, Neal Martin, Daniel R van Langenberg, Nik S Ding, Lauren Beswick, Rupert W Leong, Miles P Sparrow, Peter De Cruz","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00200-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00200-0","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The optimal dosing strategy for infliximab in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unknown. We compared intensified and standard dose infliximab rescue strategies and explored maintenance therapies following infliximab induction in ASUC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older from 13 Australian tertiary hospitals with intravenous steroid-refractory ASUC were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab or 5 mg/kg infliximab (randomisation 1). Block randomisation was used and stratified by history of thiopurine exposure and study site, with allocation concealment maintained via computer-generated randomisation. Patients in the 10 mg/kg group (intensified induction strategy [IIS]) received a second dose at day 7 or earlier at the time of non-response; all patients in the 5 mg/kg group were re-randomised between day 3 and day 7 (1:1; randomisation 2) to a standard induction strategy (SIS) or accelerated induction strategy (AIS), resulting in three induction groups. Patients in the SIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with an extra 5 mg/kg dose between day 3 and day 7 if no response. Patients in the AIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 1, and 3, with the week 1 dose increased to 10 mg/kg and given between day 3 and day 7 if no response. The primary outcome was clinical response by day 7 (reduction in Lichtiger score to &lt;10 with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline, improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day). Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes to day 7 and exploratory outcomes compared induction regimens until month 3. From month 3, maintenance therapy was selected based on treatment experience, with use of thiopurine monotherapy, combination infliximab and thiopurine, or infliximab monotherapy, with follow-up as a cohort study up to month 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02770040, and is completed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Between July 20, 2016, and Sept 24, 2021, 138 patients were randomly assigned (63 [46%] female and 75 [54%] male); 46 received a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab and 92 received 5 mg/kg infliximab. After randomisation 1, we observed no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response by day 7 between the 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups (30 [65%] of 46 vs 56 [61%] of 92, p=0·62; risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine treatment history, 1·06 [95% CI 0·94-1·20], p=0·32). We found no significant differences in secondary endpoints including time to clinical response or change in Lichtiger score from baseline to day 7. Two patients who received 10 mg/kg infliximab underwent colectomy in the first 7 days compared with no patients in the 5 mg/kg group (p=0·21). Three serious adverse events occurred in three pa","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Infliximab rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: more does not equal better. 英夫利西单抗对急性重度溃疡性结肠炎的抢救治疗:越多并不等于越好。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00229-2
Saurabh Kedia, Vineet Ahuja
{"title":"Infliximab rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: more does not equal better.","authors":"Saurabh Kedia, Vineet Ahuja","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00229-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00229-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence-assisted adenoma detection in people with Lynch syndrome. 人工智能辅助检测林奇综合征患者的腺瘤。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00223-1
Carol A Burke, Carole Macaron, Aparajita Singh
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-assisted adenoma detection in people with Lynch syndrome.","authors":"Carol A Burke, Carole Macaron, Aparajita Singh","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00223-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00223-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 21-year follow-up of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial. 只进行一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期影响:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查随机对照试验的 21 年随访。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-20 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0
Kate Wooldrage, Emma C Robbins, Stephen W Duffy, Amanda J Cross

Background: Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, uncertainty exists about the duration of protection and differences by sex and age. We assessed effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 21 years' follow-up.

Methods: The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that recruited men and women aged 55-64 years from general practices serving 14 hospitals. Among participants indicating that they would attend flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, randomisation (2:1) to the control (no further contact) or intervention (invited to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) group was performed centrally in blocks of 12, stratified by centre, general practice, and household type. Masking of intervention was infeasible. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cumulative incidence. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences, overall and stratified by subsite, sex, and age. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 28352761.

Findings: Among participants recruited between Nov 14, 1994, and March 30, 1999, 170 432 were eligible and 113 195 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 237 were randomly assigned to the intervention group. 406 participants were excluded from analyses (268 in the control group and 138 in the intervention group), leaving 112 927 participants in the control group (55 336 [49%] men and 57 591 [51%] women) and 57 099 in the intervention group (27 966 [49%] men and 29 103 [51%] women). Of participants who were invited to be screened, 40 624 (71%) attended screening. Median follow-up was 21·3 years (IQR 18·0-22·2). In the invited-to-screening group, colorectal cancer incidence was reduced compared with the control group (1631 vs 4201 cases; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 3·18% [95% CI 3·03 to 3·34] vs 4·16% [4·04 to 4·29]; HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·81]) with 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI -56 to -37). Colorectal cancer mortality was also reduced in the invited-to-screening group compared with the control group (502 vs 1329 deaths; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 0·97% [0·88 to 1·06] vs 1·33% [1·26 to 1·40]; HR 0·75 [0·67 to 0·83]) with 16 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years (-21 to -11). Effects were particularly evident in the distal colorectum (726 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 2434 cases in the control group; HR 0·59 [0·54 to 0·64]; 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years [-54 to -41]; 196 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 708 deaths in the control group; HR 0·55 [0·47 to 0·64]; 15 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-19 to -12]) and not the proximal colon (871 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 1749 cases in the control group; HR 0·98

背景:柔性乙状结肠镜筛查可降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率;但其保护作用的持续时间以及性别和年龄差异还存在不确定性。我们在 21 年的随访后评估了只进行一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查的效果:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查试验是一项多中心随机对照试验,从为 14 家医院服务的全科诊所招募 55-64 岁的男性和女性。在表示如果受邀将参加柔性乙状结肠镜筛查的参与者中,按中心、全科诊所和家庭类型分层,以 12 人为一组,集中随机分配(2:1)到对照组(不再联系)或干预组(受邀参加仅一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查)。无法对干预措施进行掩蔽。主要结果为结直肠癌发病率和死亡率。Kaplan-Meier 法估算累积发病率。主要分析估算了意向治疗危险比(HRs)和风险差异,包括总体风险和按分站、性别和年龄分层的风险。该试验已在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 28352761:在 1994 年 11 月 14 日至 1999 年 3 月 30 日期间招募的参与者中,有 170 432 人符合条件,其中 113 195 人被随机分配到对照组,57 237 人被随机分配到干预组。分析中排除了 406 名参与者(对照组 268 人,干预组 138 人),因此对照组有 112 927 人(男性 55 336 人 [49%],女性 57 591 人 [51%]),干预组有 57 099 人(男性 27 966 人 [49%],女性 29 103 人 [51%])。在受邀接受筛查的参与者中,有 40 624 人(71%)参加了筛查。随访时间中位数为 21-3 年(IQR 为 18-0-22-2)。与对照组相比,受邀筛查组的结直肠癌发病率有所降低(1631 例 vs 4201 例;21 年的累积发病率为 3-18% [95% CI 3-03 to 3-34] vs 4-16% [4-04 to 4-29];HR 0-76 [95% CI 0-72 to 0-81]),每 10 万人年减少 47 例(95% CI -56-37)。与对照组相比,受邀筛查组的结直肠癌死亡率也有所下降(502 对 1329 例死亡;21 年累计发病率为 0-97% [0-88 至 1-06] 对 1-33% [1-26 至 1-40];HR 0-75 [0-67 至 0-83]),每 10 万人年死亡人数减少 16 例(-21 至 -11)。对远端结直肠的影响尤为明显(受邀筛查组有 726 例癌症病例,对照组有 2434 例;HR 0-59 [0-54 至 0-64];每 10 万人年减少 47 例[-54 至 -41];受邀筛查组有 196 例癌症死亡病例,对照组有 708 例;HR 0-55 [0-47 至 0-64];每 10 万人年减少 15 例死亡[-19 至 -12]),而不是近端结肠(受邀筛查组中有 871 例癌症病例,对照组中有 1749 例;HR 0-98 [0-91 至 1-07];每 10 万人年减少 1 例[-8 至 5];受邀筛查组中有 277 例癌症死亡,对照组中有 547 例;HR 1-00 [0-86 至 1-15];每 10 万人年减少 0 例死亡[-4 至 4])。男性结直肠癌发病率的 HR 值(0-70 [0-65-0-76])低于女性(0-86 [0-79 至 0-93];pinteraction=0-0007),但年龄没有差异:我们的研究表明,只需进行一次柔性乙状结肠镜筛查,就能在二十年内降低结直肠癌发病率和死亡率,并为结直肠癌筛查指南提供了重要数据:国家健康与护理研究所健康技术评估计划和医学研究委员会。
{"title":"Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 21-year follow-up of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Kate Wooldrage, Emma C Robbins, Stephen W Duffy, Amanda J Cross","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, uncertainty exists about the duration of protection and differences by sex and age. We assessed effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 21 years' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that recruited men and women aged 55-64 years from general practices serving 14 hospitals. Among participants indicating that they would attend flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, randomisation (2:1) to the control (no further contact) or intervention (invited to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) group was performed centrally in blocks of 12, stratified by centre, general practice, and household type. Masking of intervention was infeasible. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cumulative incidence. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences, overall and stratified by subsite, sex, and age. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 28352761.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among participants recruited between Nov 14, 1994, and March 30, 1999, 170 432 were eligible and 113 195 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 237 were randomly assigned to the intervention group. 406 participants were excluded from analyses (268 in the control group and 138 in the intervention group), leaving 112 927 participants in the control group (55 336 [49%] men and 57 591 [51%] women) and 57 099 in the intervention group (27 966 [49%] men and 29 103 [51%] women). Of participants who were invited to be screened, 40 624 (71%) attended screening. Median follow-up was 21·3 years (IQR 18·0-22·2). In the invited-to-screening group, colorectal cancer incidence was reduced compared with the control group (1631 vs 4201 cases; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 3·18% [95% CI 3·03 to 3·34] vs 4·16% [4·04 to 4·29]; HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·81]) with 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI -56 to -37). Colorectal cancer mortality was also reduced in the invited-to-screening group compared with the control group (502 vs 1329 deaths; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 0·97% [0·88 to 1·06] vs 1·33% [1·26 to 1·40]; HR 0·75 [0·67 to 0·83]) with 16 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years (-21 to -11). Effects were particularly evident in the distal colorectum (726 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 2434 cases in the control group; HR 0·59 [0·54 to 0·64]; 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years [-54 to -41]; 196 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 708 deaths in the control group; HR 0·55 [0·47 to 0·64]; 15 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-19 to -12]) and not the proximal colon (871 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 1749 cases in the control group; HR 0·98","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hepatitis C epidemic among Rohingya refugees in Cox's Bazar: a public health emergency. 科克斯巴扎尔地区罗辛亚难民中流行的丙型肝炎:公共卫生紧急状况。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00230-9
Udani Samarasekera
{"title":"Hepatitis C epidemic among Rohingya refugees in Cox's Bazar: a public health emergency.","authors":"Udani Samarasekera","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00230-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00230-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies. 门静脉血栓:诊断、管理和未来临床研究的终点。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00155-9
Laure Elkrief, Virginia Hernandez-Gea, Marco Senzolo, Agustin Albillos, Anna Baiges, Annalisa Berzigotti, Christophe Bureau, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Andrea De Gottardi, François Durand, Juan-Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Ton Lisman, Mattias Mandorfer, Valérie McLin, Lucile Moga, Filipe Nery, Patrick Northup, Alexandre Nuzzo, Valérie Paradis, David Patch, Audrey Payancé, Vincent Plaforet, Aurélie Plessier, Johanne Poisson, Lara Roberts, Riad Salem, Shiv Sarin, Akash Shukla, Christian Toso, Dhiraj Tripathi, Dominique Valla, Maxime Ronot, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) refers to the development of a non-malignant obstruction of the portal vein, its branches, its radicles, or a combination. This Review first provides a comprehensive overview of all aspects of PVT, namely the specifics of the portal venous system, the risk factors for PVT, the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in PVT, the interest in non-invasive tests, as well as therapeutic approaches including the effect of treating risk factors for PVT or cause of cirrhosis, anticoagulation, portal vein recanalisation by interventional radiology, and prevention and management of variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. Specific issues are also addressed including portal cholangiopathy, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal necrosis, quality of life, fertility, contraception and pregnancy, and PVT in children. This Review will then present endpoints for future clinical studies in PVT, both in patients with and without cirrhosis, agreed by a large panel of experts through a Delphi consensus process. These endpoints include classification of portal vein thrombus extension, classification of PVT evolution, timing of assessment of PVT, and global endpoints for studies on PVT including clinical outcomes. These endpoints will help homogenise studies on PVT and thus facilitate reporting, comparison between studies, and validation of future studies and trials on PVT.

门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是指门静脉、其分支、其分支或其组合发生非恶性阻塞。本综述首先全面概述了门静脉血栓形成的各个方面,即门静脉系统的特殊性、门静脉血栓形成的危险因素、门静脉血栓形成中门静脉高压的病理生理学、对无创检查的兴趣,以及治疗方法,包括治疗门静脉血栓形成危险因素或肝硬化病因的效果、抗凝、通过介入放射学进行门静脉再通术,以及门静脉血栓形成患者静脉曲张出血的预防和管理。本综述还讨论了一些具体问题,包括门静脉胆管病变、肠系膜缺血和肠坏死、生活质量、生育、避孕和妊娠以及儿童的静脉曲张。随后,本综述将介绍未来对肝硬化和非肝硬化患者进行 PVT 临床研究的终点,这些终点是由一个大型专家小组通过德尔菲共识程序商定的。这些终点包括门静脉血栓扩展分类、门静脉血栓演变分类、门静脉血栓评估时机以及包括临床结果在内的门静脉血栓研究总体终点。这些终点将有助于PVT研究的同质化,从而方便报告、研究间比较以及未来PVT研究和试验的验证。
{"title":"Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies.","authors":"Laure Elkrief, Virginia Hernandez-Gea, Marco Senzolo, Agustin Albillos, Anna Baiges, Annalisa Berzigotti, Christophe Bureau, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Andrea De Gottardi, François Durand, Juan-Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Ton Lisman, Mattias Mandorfer, Valérie McLin, Lucile Moga, Filipe Nery, Patrick Northup, Alexandre Nuzzo, Valérie Paradis, David Patch, Audrey Payancé, Vincent Plaforet, Aurélie Plessier, Johanne Poisson, Lara Roberts, Riad Salem, Shiv Sarin, Akash Shukla, Christian Toso, Dhiraj Tripathi, Dominique Valla, Maxime Ronot, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00155-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00155-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) refers to the development of a non-malignant obstruction of the portal vein, its branches, its radicles, or a combination. This Review first provides a comprehensive overview of all aspects of PVT, namely the specifics of the portal venous system, the risk factors for PVT, the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in PVT, the interest in non-invasive tests, as well as therapeutic approaches including the effect of treating risk factors for PVT or cause of cirrhosis, anticoagulation, portal vein recanalisation by interventional radiology, and prevention and management of variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. Specific issues are also addressed including portal cholangiopathy, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal necrosis, quality of life, fertility, contraception and pregnancy, and PVT in children. This Review will then present endpoints for future clinical studies in PVT, both in patients with and without cirrhosis, agreed by a large panel of experts through a Delphi consensus process. These endpoints include classification of portal vein thrombus extension, classification of PVT evolution, timing of assessment of PVT, and global endpoints for studies on PVT including clinical outcomes. These endpoints will help homogenise studies on PVT and thus facilitate reporting, comparison between studies, and validation of future studies and trials on PVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141602252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Viral hepatitis: time for action. 病毒性肝炎:是时候采取行动了。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00240-1
The Lancet Gastroenterology Hepatology
{"title":"Viral hepatitis: time for action.","authors":"The Lancet Gastroenterology Hepatology","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00240-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00240-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141790100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends and levels of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis between 1990 and 2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. 1990 年至 2021 年全球、地区和国家阑尾炎负担的趋势和水平:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的结果。
IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00157-2

Background: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency that poses a large clinical and economic burden. Understanding the global burden of appendicitis is crucial for evaluating unmet needs and implementing and scaling up intervention services to reduce adverse health outcomes. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis, by age and sex, from 1990 to 2021.

Methods: Vital registration and verbal autopsy data, the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), and demographic estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) were used to estimate cause-specific mortality rates (CSMRs) for appendicitis. Incidence data were extracted from insurance claims and inpatient discharge sources and analysed with disease modelling meta-regression, version 2.1 (DisMod-MR 2.1). Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by combining death counts with standard life expectancy at the age of death. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were estimated by multiplying incidence estimates by an average disease duration of 2 weeks and a disability weight for abdominal pain. YLLs and YLDs were summed to estimate disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).

Findings: In 2021, the global age-standardised mortality rate of appendicitis was 0·358 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0·311-0·414) per 100 000. Mortality rates ranged from 1·01 (0·895-1·13) per 100 000 in central Latin America to 0·054 (0·0464-0·0617) per 100 000 in high-income Asia Pacific. The global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis in 2021 was 214 (174-274) per 100 000, corresponding to 17 million (13·8-21·6) new cases. The incidence rate was the highest in high-income Asia Pacific, at 364 (286-475) per 100 000 and the lowest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 81·4 (63·9-109) per 100 000. The global age-standardised rates of mortality, incidence, YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs due to appendicitis decreased steadily between 1990 and 2021, with the largest reduction in mortality and YLL rates. The global annualised rate of decline in the DALY rate was greatest in children younger than the age of 10 years. Although mortality rates due to appendicitis decreased in all regions, there were large regional variations in the temporal trend in incidence. Although the global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis has steadily decreased between 1990 and 2021, almost half of GBD regions saw an increase of greater than 10% in their age-standardised incidence rates.

Interpretation: Slow but promising progress has been observed in reducing the overall burden of appendicitis in all regions. However, there are important geographical variations in appendicitis incidence and mortality, and the relationship between these measures suggests that many people still do not have access to quality health care. As the incidence of appendicitis is rising

背景:阑尾炎是一种常见的外科急症,造成了巨大的临床和经济负担。了解阑尾炎的全球负担对于评估未满足的需求以及实施和扩大干预服务以减少不良健康后果至关重要。本研究旨在按年龄和性别全面评估 1990 年至 2021 年全球、地区和国家的阑尾炎负担:方法:采用生命登记和口头尸检数据、死因集合模型(CODEM)以及全球疾病负担、伤害和风险因素研究(GBD)中的人口估计数据来估算阑尾炎的特定病因死亡率(CSMRs)。从保险理赔和住院病人出院资料中提取了发病数据,并使用疾病模型元回归 2.1 版(DisMod-MR 2.1)进行了分析。通过将死亡人数与死亡年龄时的标准预期寿命相结合,估算出生命损失年数(YLLs)。残疾生活年数(YLDs)是将发病率估计值乘以平均病程 2 周和腹痛的残疾权重估算得出的。将 "残疾生活年数 "和 "残疾生活年数 "相加,估算出残疾调整寿命年数(DALYs):2021年,全球阑尾炎年龄标准化死亡率为每10万人0-358(95%不确定区间[UI] 0-311-0-414)。死亡率从拉丁美洲中部的每 10 万人 1-01 例(0-895-1-13)到亚太地区高收入国家的每 10 万人 0-054 例(0-0464-0-0617)不等。2021 年全球阑尾炎年龄标准化发病率为每 10 万人 214 例(174-274 例),相当于 1700 万例(13-8-21-6 例)新病例。高收入的亚太地区发病率最高,为每10万人364例(286-475例),撒哈拉以南非洲西部发病率最低,为每10万人81-4例(63-9-109例)。从 1990 年到 2021 年,阑尾炎导致的全球年龄标准化死亡率、发病率、YLLs、YLDs 和 DALYs 逐年下降,其中死亡率和 YLLs 下降幅度最大。10岁以下儿童的残疾调整寿命年数全球年化下降率最高。虽然所有地区的阑尾炎死亡率都有所下降,但发病率的时间趋势却存在很大的地区差异。虽然1990年至2021年期间全球阑尾炎的年龄标准化发病率稳步下降,但几乎有一半的GBD地区的年龄标准化发病率上升了10%以上:所有地区在减少阑尾炎总体负担方面都取得了缓慢但可喜的进展。然而,阑尾炎的发病率和死亡率在地域上存在很大差异,这些指标之间的关系表明,许多人仍然无法获得高质量的医疗保健服务。由于阑尾炎的发病率在世界许多地区都在上升,各国应为及时、高质量的诊断和治疗做好医疗保健基础设施的准备。考虑到诊断水平的提高有可能反直觉地推动发病率明显上升的趋势,在开展这些工作的同时,还应加强数据收集工作,这对于了解发病趋势和制定有针对性的干预措施也至关重要:比尔及梅林达-盖茨基金会。
{"title":"Trends and levels of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis between 1990 and 2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00157-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00157-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency that poses a large clinical and economic burden. Understanding the global burden of appendicitis is crucial for evaluating unmet needs and implementing and scaling up intervention services to reduce adverse health outcomes. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis, by age and sex, from 1990 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vital registration and verbal autopsy data, the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), and demographic estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) were used to estimate cause-specific mortality rates (CSMRs) for appendicitis. Incidence data were extracted from insurance claims and inpatient discharge sources and analysed with disease modelling meta-regression, version 2.1 (DisMod-MR 2.1). Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by combining death counts with standard life expectancy at the age of death. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were estimated by multiplying incidence estimates by an average disease duration of 2 weeks and a disability weight for abdominal pain. YLLs and YLDs were summed to estimate disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2021, the global age-standardised mortality rate of appendicitis was 0·358 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0·311-0·414) per 100 000. Mortality rates ranged from 1·01 (0·895-1·13) per 100 000 in central Latin America to 0·054 (0·0464-0·0617) per 100 000 in high-income Asia Pacific. The global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis in 2021 was 214 (174-274) per 100 000, corresponding to 17 million (13·8-21·6) new cases. The incidence rate was the highest in high-income Asia Pacific, at 364 (286-475) per 100 000 and the lowest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 81·4 (63·9-109) per 100 000. The global age-standardised rates of mortality, incidence, YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs due to appendicitis decreased steadily between 1990 and 2021, with the largest reduction in mortality and YLL rates. The global annualised rate of decline in the DALY rate was greatest in children younger than the age of 10 years. Although mortality rates due to appendicitis decreased in all regions, there were large regional variations in the temporal trend in incidence. Although the global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis has steadily decreased between 1990 and 2021, almost half of GBD regions saw an increase of greater than 10% in their age-standardised incidence rates.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Slow but promising progress has been observed in reducing the overall burden of appendicitis in all regions. However, there are important geographical variations in appendicitis incidence and mortality, and the relationship between these measures suggests that many people still do not have access to quality health care. As the incidence of appendicitis is rising ","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11306195/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1