Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Materials and methods: Seventy-three patients with resectable LAGC were enrolled and named the PAC group (n=39) or apatinib plus chemotherapy (AC) group (n=34) based on the treatment they chose. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered in a 21-day cycle for 3 consecutive cycles, after which surgery was performed.
Results: The PAC group exhibited a higher objective response rate than the AC group (74.4% vs. 58.8%, P=0.159). Moreover, the PAC group showed a numerically better response profile than the AC group (P=0.081). Strikingly, progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.049) were prolonged, whereas disease-free survival (DFS) tended to be longer in the PAC group than in the AC group (P=0.056). Briefly, the 3-year PFS, DFS, and OS rates were 76.1%, 76.1%, and 86.7% in the PAC group and 46.9%, 49.9%, and 70.3% in the AC group, respectively. Furthermore, PAC (vs. AC) treatment (hazard ratio=0.286, P=0.034) was independently associated with prolonged PFS in multivariate Cox regression analyses. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05), where leukopenia, anemia, hypertension, and other adverse events were commonly observed in the PAC group.
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant PAC therapy may achieve a preferable pathological response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival compared to AC therapy with a similar safety profile in patients with LAGC; however, further validation is warranted.
{"title":"Neoadjuvant PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Apatinib and Chemotherapy Versus Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Cohort Study.","authors":"Chunjing Wang, Zhen Wang, Yue Zhao, Fujing Wang","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e17","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-three patients with resectable LAGC were enrolled and named the PAC group (n=39) or apatinib plus chemotherapy (AC) group (n=34) based on the treatment they chose. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered in a 21-day cycle for 3 consecutive cycles, after which surgery was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PAC group exhibited a higher objective response rate than the AC group (74.4% vs. 58.8%, P=0.159). Moreover, the PAC group showed a numerically better response profile than the AC group (P=0.081). Strikingly, progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.049) were prolonged, whereas disease-free survival (DFS) tended to be longer in the PAC group than in the AC group (P=0.056). Briefly, the 3-year PFS, DFS, and OS rates were 76.1%, 76.1%, and 86.7% in the PAC group and 46.9%, 49.9%, and 70.3% in the AC group, respectively. Furthermore, PAC (vs. AC) treatment (hazard ratio=0.286, P=0.034) was independently associated with prolonged PFS in multivariate Cox regression analyses. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05), where leukopenia, anemia, hypertension, and other adverse events were commonly observed in the PAC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant PAC therapy may achieve a preferable pathological response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival compared to AC therapy with a similar safety profile in patients with LAGC; however, further validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/8a/jgc-23-328.PMC10154141.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9415773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Miyoung Choi, Baek-Hui Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chang In Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Chung Hyun Tae, Chung Sik Gong, Dong Jin Kim, Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho, Eun Jeong Gong, Geum Jong Song, Hyeon-Su Im, Hye Seong Ahn, Hyun Lim, Hyung-Don Kim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong Won Lee, Ji Yeon Park, Jwa Hoon Kim, Kyoung Doo Song, Minkyu Jung, Mi Ran Jung, Sang-Yong Son, Shin-Hoo Park, Soo Jin Kim, Sung Hak Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Woo Kyun Bae, Woong Sub Koom, Yeseob Jee, Yoo Min Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Young Suk Park, Hye Sook Han, Su Youn Nam, Seong-Ho Kong
This corrects the article on p. 3 in vol. 23, PMID: 36750993.
这更正了第23卷第3页的文章,PMID: 36750993。
{"title":"Erratum: Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach.","authors":"Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Miyoung Choi, Baek-Hui Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chang In Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Chung Hyun Tae, Chung Sik Gong, Dong Jin Kim, Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho, Eun Jeong Gong, Geum Jong Song, Hyeon-Su Im, Hye Seong Ahn, Hyun Lim, Hyung-Don Kim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong Won Lee, Ji Yeon Park, Jwa Hoon Kim, Kyoung Doo Song, Minkyu Jung, Mi Ran Jung, Sang-Yong Son, Shin-Hoo Park, Soo Jin Kim, Sung Hak Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Woo Kyun Bae, Woong Sub Koom, Yeseob Jee, Yoo Min Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Young Suk Park, Hye Sook Han, Su Youn Nam, Seong-Ho Kong","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e20","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This corrects the article on p. 3 in vol. 23, PMID: 36750993.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/4a/jgc-23-365.PMC10154136.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9405363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
https://jgc-online.org What is learned rapidly becomes outdated. Experiences and things learned by reading research evidence may be selective or inappropriately implemented. In addition, research evidence is everchanging and, consequently, no practitioner can keep abreast of all updates. However, quality and efficiency must be ensured to treat patients encountered in clinical practice. This may be the main reason why so much time is spent developing and reading guidelines.
{"title":"A Big Step Forward in the New KGCA Guidelines.","authors":"Sang-Yong Son, Sang-Uk Han","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e8","url":null,"abstract":"https://jgc-online.org What is learned rapidly becomes outdated. Experiences and things learned by reading research evidence may be selective or inappropriately implemented. In addition, research evidence is everchanging and, consequently, no practitioner can keep abreast of all updates. However, quality and efficiency must be ensured to treat patients encountered in clinical practice. This may be the main reason why so much time is spent developing and reading guidelines.","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/4d/jgc-23-1.PMC9911620.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9302263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maintaining the postoperative quality of life (QOL) while ensuring curability without overtreatment is important in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Postoperative QOL is anticipated to be maintained through minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. The concept of the sentinel lymph node (SN) basin is essential to maintain the curability of early gastric cancer using minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy. However, additional resection after surgery is difficult to perform in gastric cancer. Thus, the SN basin theory is important. Recently, a multicenter randomized phase III trial in South Korea (SENORITA trial) proved that laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for stomach preservation results in better postoperative QOL compared with standard gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer. LSNNS contributes to patients' QOL based on the concept that curability is not impaired. A multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial is ongoing in Japan, and oncologic safety is expected to be demonstrated. LSNNS has been established as a treatment option for selected patients with early gastric cancer, and its application will become widespread in the future.
{"title":"Recent Advances in Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Eisuke Booka, Hiroya Takeuchi","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining the postoperative quality of life (QOL) while ensuring curability without overtreatment is important in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Postoperative QOL is anticipated to be maintained through minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. The concept of the sentinel lymph node (SN) basin is essential to maintain the curability of early gastric cancer using minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy. However, additional resection after surgery is difficult to perform in gastric cancer. Thus, the SN basin theory is important. Recently, a multicenter randomized phase III trial in South Korea (SENORITA trial) proved that laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for stomach preservation results in better postoperative QOL compared with standard gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer. LSNNS contributes to patients' QOL based on the concept that curability is not impaired. A multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial is ongoing in Japan, and oncologic safety is expected to be demonstrated. LSNNS has been established as a treatment option for selected patients with early gastric cancer, and its application will become widespread in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/96/jgc-23-159.PMC9911613.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9287267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Miyoung Choi, Baek-Hui Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chang In Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Chung Hyun Tae, Chung Sik Gong, Dong Jin Kim, Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho, Eun Jeong Gong, Geum Jong Song, Hyeon-Su Im, Hye Seong Ahn, Hyun Lim, Hyung-Don Kim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong Won Lee, Ji Yeon Park, Jwa Hoon Kim, Kyoung Doo Song, Minkyu Jung, Mi Ran Jung, Sang-Yong Son, Shin-Hoo Park, Soo Jin Kim, Sung Hak Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Woo Kyun Bae, Woong Sub Koom, Yeseob Jee, Yoo Min Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Young Suk Park, Hye Sook Han, Su Youn Nam, Seong-Ho Kong
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
胃癌是韩国乃至全球最常见的癌症之一。自 2004 年以来,这是韩国发布的第 4 份胃癌指南,也是 2018 年对以往循证方法的修订版。本指南是跨学科工作组的合作成果,包括胃外科、消化内科、内镜、肿瘤内科、腹部放射科、病理科、核医学、放射肿瘤学领域的专家和指南制定方法。经过工作组的合作审查,共更新或提出了 33 个关键问题,并根据使用 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 KoreaMed 数据库进行的系统审查制定了 40 项声明。根据 "建议分级、评估、发展和评价"(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation)命题,对证据水平和建议分级进行了分类。证据水平、益处、危害和临床适用性被视为推荐的重要因素。工作组对建议进行了审查和讨论,以达成共识。在前一部分,总体考虑讨论了内窥镜检查、病理学、放射学和核医学的筛查、诊断和分期。流程图描述了各项陈述,并辅以荟萃分析和参考文献。由于临床试验和系统综述不适合术后肿瘤学和营养学随访,工作组同意在全国范围内对韩国所有三级医院或综合医院的临床实践进行调查。这项调查的目的是提供有关随访的基线信息。在此,我们提出了以证据为基础的多学科胃癌指南。
{"title":"Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach.","authors":"Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Miyoung Choi, Baek-Hui Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chang In Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Chung Hyun Tae, Chung Sik Gong, Dong Jin Kim, Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho, Eun Jeong Gong, Geum Jong Song, Hyeon-Su Im, Hye Seong Ahn, Hyun Lim, Hyung-Don Kim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong Won Lee, Ji Yeon Park, Jwa Hoon Kim, Kyoung Doo Song, Minkyu Jung, Mi Ran Jung, Sang-Yong Son, Shin-Hoo Park, Soo Jin Kim, Sung Hak Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Woo Kyun Bae, Woong Sub Koom, Yeseob Jee, Yoo Min Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Young Suk Park, Hye Sook Han, Su Youn Nam, Seong-Ho Kong","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/df/jgc-23-3.PMC9911619.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9438183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Presently, surgery is the only treatment approach for gastric cancer and improving the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer is one of the key factors in promoting gastric cancer survival benefit. The MAGIC study was the first to demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in European countries. In recent years, several clinical trials have provided evidence for the use of NAC in Asian patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, clinical practice guidelines vary between Asian and non-Asian populations. Optimal NAC regimens, proper target populations, and predictors of NAC outcomes in Asian patients are still under investigation. Herein, we summarized the current progress in the administration of NAC in Asian patients with gastric cancer.
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Asian Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Xie Tong, Peng Zhi, Shen Lin","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e12","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Presently, surgery is the only treatment approach for gastric cancer and improving the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer is one of the key factors in promoting gastric cancer survival benefit. The MAGIC study was the first to demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in European countries. In recent years, several clinical trials have provided evidence for the use of NAC in Asian patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, clinical practice guidelines vary between Asian and non-Asian populations. Optimal NAC regimens, proper target populations, and predictors of NAC outcomes in Asian patients are still under investigation. Herein, we summarized the current progress in the administration of NAC in Asian patients with gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/3b/jgc-23-182.PMC9911622.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10742235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Eastern Asian countries. In particular, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) leads to a high en bloc resection rate, enabling accurate pathological evaluation. As undifferentiated EGC (UD-EGC) is known to result in a higher incidence of LNM and infiltrative growth than differentiated EGC (D-EGC), the indications for ER are limited compared with those for D-EGC. Previously, clinical staging as intramucosal UD-EGC ≤2 cm, without ulceration, was presented as 'weakly recommended' or 'expanded indications' for ER in the guidelines of the United States, Europe, Korea, and Japan. Based on promising long-term outcomes from a prospective multicenter study by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1009/1010, the status of this indication has expanded and is now considered 'absolute indications' in the latest Japanese guidelines published in 2021. In this study, which comprised 275 patients with UD-EGC (cT1a, ≤2 cm, without ulceration) treated with ESD, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 97.1%-99.8%), which was higher than the threshold 5-year OS (89.9%). Currently, the levels of evidence grades and recommendations for ER of UD-EGC differ among Japan, Korea, and Western countries. Therefore, a further discussion is warranted to generalize the indications for ER of UD-EGC in countries besides Japan.
{"title":"Endoscopic Resection of Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Yuichiro Hirai, Seiichiro Abe, Mai Ego Makiguchi, Masau Sekiguchi, Satoru Nonaka, Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Yutaka Saito","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Eastern Asian countries. In particular, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) leads to a high en bloc resection rate, enabling accurate pathological evaluation. As undifferentiated EGC (UD-EGC) is known to result in a higher incidence of LNM and infiltrative growth than differentiated EGC (D-EGC), the indications for ER are limited compared with those for D-EGC. Previously, clinical staging as intramucosal UD-EGC ≤2 cm, without ulceration, was presented as 'weakly recommended' or 'expanded indications' for ER in the guidelines of the United States, Europe, Korea, and Japan. Based on promising long-term outcomes from a prospective multicenter study by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1009/1010, the status of this indication has expanded and is now considered 'absolute indications' in the latest Japanese guidelines published in 2021. In this study, which comprised 275 patients with UD-EGC (cT1a, ≤2 cm, without ulceration) treated with ESD, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 97.1%-99.8%), which was higher than the threshold 5-year OS (89.9%). Currently, the levels of evidence grades and recommendations for ER of UD-EGC differ among Japan, Korea, and Western countries. Therefore, a further discussion is warranted to generalize the indications for ER of UD-EGC in countries besides Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/75/jgc-23-146.PMC9911616.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9306304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Under the standard of care, patients with advanced GC (AGC) have a median survival time of approximately 12-15 months. With the emergence of immunotherapy as a key therapeutic strategy in medical oncology, relevant changes are expected in the systemic treatment of GC. In the phase III ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab, a monoclonal anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, as a third- or later-line treatment improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in patients with AGC. Furthermore, nivolumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil and platinum as a first-line treatment improved OS in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative AGC in the global phase III CheckMate-649 study. Another anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab, in combination with trastuzumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, significantly improved the overall response rate in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential components of the current treatment of GC. Subsequent treatments after ICI combination therapy, such as ICI rechallenge or combination therapy with agents having other modes of action, are being actively investigated to date. On the basis of the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of AGC, various clinical trials are underway to apply this therapeutic strategy in the perioperative and postoperative settings for patients with early GC. This review describes recent progress in immunotherapy and potential immunotherapy biomarkers for GC.
{"title":"Recent Progress in Immunotherapy for Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Jeesun Yoon, Tae-Yong Kim, Do-Youn Oh","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Under the standard of care, patients with advanced GC (AGC) have a median survival time of approximately 12-15 months. With the emergence of immunotherapy as a key therapeutic strategy in medical oncology, relevant changes are expected in the systemic treatment of GC. In the phase III ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab, a monoclonal anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, as a third- or later-line treatment improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in patients with AGC. Furthermore, nivolumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil and platinum as a first-line treatment improved OS in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative AGC in the global phase III CheckMate-649 study. Another anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab, in combination with trastuzumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, significantly improved the overall response rate in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential components of the current treatment of GC. Subsequent treatments after ICI combination therapy, such as ICI rechallenge or combination therapy with agents having other modes of action, are being actively investigated to date. On the basis of the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of AGC, various clinical trials are underway to apply this therapeutic strategy in the perioperative and postoperative settings for patients with early GC. This review describes recent progress in immunotherapy and potential immunotherapy biomarkers for GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/68/jgc-23-207.PMC9911614.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10742236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although continuous improvement in the treatment outcome of localized gastric cancer has been achieved through early screening, diagnosis, and treatment and the active application of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, the necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. In this review, based on the results of two recently published randomized phase III studies (Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy In Stomach Cancer 2 and ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemoTherapy of Cancer in the Stomach) and a meta-analysis of six randomized trials including these two studies, the role of adjuvant RT in gastric cancer was evaluated and discussed, especially in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. This article also reported the possible indications for adjuvant RT in the current clinical situation and in future research to enable patient-specific treatments according to the risk of recurrence.
{"title":"Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Jeong Il Yu","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although continuous improvement in the treatment outcome of localized gastric cancer has been achieved through early screening, diagnosis, and treatment and the active application of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, the necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. In this review, based on the results of two recently published randomized phase III studies (Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy In Stomach Cancer 2 and ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemoTherapy of Cancer in the Stomach) and a meta-analysis of six randomized trials including these two studies, the role of adjuvant RT in gastric cancer was evaluated and discussed, especially in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. This article also reported the possible indications for adjuvant RT in the current clinical situation and in future research to enable patient-specific treatments according to the risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/58/jgc-23-194.PMC9911621.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10742237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Currently, the prevalence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) is increasing in both Asian and Western countries, although the increasing rate in Asian countries is much slower than in Western countries. With these current trends, concerns regarding the surgical treatment method are also increasing among gastrointestinal surgeons. However, the surgical treatment for GEJAC has been a controversial issue for a long time due to the relative scarcity of this tumor and its characteristics from its borderline location. Recently, a large-scale prospective study of this tumor has been conducted in Japan, and the results are now available. The results of this study will be helpful for understanding this tumor. In this article, the pattern of lymph node metastasis of GEJAC is reviewed, and the extent and method of lymph node dissection for this tumor are discussed and proposed based on the review.
{"title":"Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Jin-Jo Kim","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, the prevalence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) is increasing in both Asian and Western countries, although the increasing rate in Asian countries is much slower than in Western countries. With these current trends, concerns regarding the surgical treatment method are also increasing among gastrointestinal surgeons. However, the surgical treatment for GEJAC has been a controversial issue for a long time due to the relative scarcity of this tumor and its characteristics from its borderline location. Recently, a large-scale prospective study of this tumor has been conducted in Japan, and the results are now available. The results of this study will be helpful for understanding this tumor. In this article, the pattern of lymph node metastasis of GEJAC is reviewed, and the extent and method of lymph node dissection for this tumor are discussed and proposed based on the review.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8b/e9/jgc-23-171.PMC9911615.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9306303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}