Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie最新文献

Purpose: To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV₉₀) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.

Methods: We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL^-1. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.

Results: Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV₉₀ was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.

Conclusions: The estimated PIEB EV₉₀ for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL^-1 approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.

Study registration: ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.

Purpose: Subcutaneous emphysema is a common complication of laparoscopic surgery. We aimed to determine the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema.

Methods: We conducted a single-centre historical cohort study of adult patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery at Kagoshima University Hospital between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2021. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema.

Results: We included 1,642 patients with a median [interquartile range] age of 65 [53-72] yr. Postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema was diagnosed in 600 (37%) patients. Female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 99.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.58), peak end-tidal carbon dioxide ≥ 45 mm Hg (OR, 2.07; 99.5% CI, 1.43 to2.98), and use of the AirSeal® Intelligent Flow System (CONMED Corp., Largo, FL, USA) (OR, 3.37; 99.5% CI, 2.34 to 4.87) were independent factors associated with postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema. In addition, a lower body mass index was significantly associated with increased postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema (P for trend < 0.001). No complications were associated with postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema.

Conclusions: This historical cohort study showed a relatively high incidence of postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema. In addition to previously reported risk factors, female sex and use of the AirSeal Intelligent Flow System were found to be associated with postlaparoscopic subcutaneous emphysema.

Purpose: Anesthetic management during rigid bronchoscopy in children can be challenging, and continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) monitoring is often unachievable. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcCO₂) monitoring is strongly correlated with the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) and EtCO₂. We aimed to investigate the incidence of hypercapnia in children undergoing rigid bronchoscopy.

Methods: We enrolled patients aged < 18 yr scheduled for rigid bronchoscopy in a prospective observational study. We recorded TcCO₂ values from anesthesia induction to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay. We ended monitoring when TcCO₂ reached values ≤ 50 mm Hg. The operating room (OR) team was blinded to the TcCO₂. The outcome of primary interest was the incidence of hypercapnia (TcCO₂ > 50 mm Hg) in the OR. Other outcomes were the incidences of hypercapnia in the PACU and severe hypercapnia (TcCO₂ > 90 mm Hg), factors possibly related to hypercapnia (patient, surgery, or anesthesia factors), and the incidence of perioperative adverse events.

Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 3.5 [1.5-8.0] yr. The incidence of hypercapnia was 100% in the OR and 60% in the PACU. Five cases (17%) presented with severe hypercapnia in the OR. The highest median [IQR] TcCO₂ was 69 [61-79] mm Hg. The most common adverse event was oxygen desaturation (57%, 17/30). Patients with severe hypercapnia had long stays in the PACU.

Conclusion: Hypercapnia was a frequent event in children undergoing rigid bronchoscopy and severe hypercapnia was associated with a long PACU stay. Further studies are needed to assess the utility of TcCO₂ monitoring in guiding ventilatory interventions during these cases.

Purpose: Applying a cervical collar during videolaryngoscopic intubation can increase the lifting force required to achieve adequate glottic view, potentially increasing cervical spine motion. We aimed to compared cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation between applying only the posterior piece (posterior-only group) and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces (anterior-posterior group) in patients wearing a cervical collar.

Methods: We conducted a dingle-centre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in 102 patients (each group, N = 51). We used a videolaryngoscope (AceScope™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with a Macintosh-style blade (AceBlade™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for videolaryngoscopic intubation. In each group (posterior-only vs anterior-posterior), we measured cervical spine motion during intubation, defined as change in cervical spine angle (calculated as cervical spine angle at intubation minus that before intubation) at three cervical spine segments on lateral cervical spine radiographs.

Results: The differences in mean cervical spine motion during intubation between the posterior-only and anterior-posterior groups were 1.2° (98.3% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 3.0), 1.0° (98.3% CI, -0.6 to 2.6), and -0.3° (98.3% CI, -2.2 to 1.7) at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) cervical spine angles at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments in the posterior-only vs anterior-posterior groups were 10.8° (4.2) vs 9.6° (3.3) (P = 0.13), 5.6° (3.0) vs 4.7° (3.5) (P = 0.14), and 1.2° (3.7) vs 1.5° (4.3) (P = 0.74), respectively. Intubation times were shorter in the posterior-only group (median [interquartile range], 23 [19-28] sec vs 33 [20-47] sec; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: In patients wearing a cervical collar, the differences in mean cervical spine motions during intubation between applying only the posterior piece and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces were approximately 1°. Intubation times were significantly shorter without the anterior piece of a cervical collar. These findings can be referred to when removal of the anterior piece of a cervical collar is considered to address difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation conditions.

Study registration: CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008151 ); first submitted 17 January 2023.

Background: With spinal anesthesia, when cases are taking longer than usual, there may be behavioural tendencies for surgical teams to work more quickly. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to examine standard deviations of surgical times for single-dose spinal anesthetics versus general anesthesia. We compared ratios of mean surgical times as a secondary endpoint.

Methods: We included randomized trials of humans where general or spinal anesthesia was used for one category of surgical procedure (e.g., hip arthroplasty) and the article reported the means and standard deviations of operative durations. We used statistical methods suitable for surgical times following log-normal distributions. We used generalized confidence intervals to calculate point estimates of ratios and standard errors for each study, followed by pooling among studies using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects meta-analysis with Knapp-Hartung adjustment.

Results: Among the 77 included studies, 96% were of high quality for our endpoint (i.e., had a low risk of bias), as no (0%) study focused on comparing variability of surgical times and none had surgical time as the primary endpoint. Spinal anesthesia was associated with 6.6% smaller standard deviations than general anesthesia (95% confidence interval, 15.8% smaller to 1.9% larger, P = 0.13). By meta-regression, there was no significant association of the ratios of standard deviations with study quality (P = 0.39), year of publication (P = 0.76), or categories of procedures (all five P ≥ 0.28). Spinal anesthesia was associated with 1.1% smaller means than general anesthesia (95% confidence interval, 3.7% smaller to 1.5% larger, P = 0.42). There were no significant associations between the ratios of means and study quality (P = 0.47), year of publication (P = 0.95), or categories of procedures (all five, P ≥ 0.63).

Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show with high confidence that the effect of choosing spinal anesthesia on variability in surgical time, if present, is sufficiently small to have no substantive direct economic effect. The same conclusion applies to mean surgical time. Therefore, although anesthetic choice has a clinical (biological) impact and affects anesthesia times, the direct effects on surgical times and workflow are minimal at most. Anesthetic choice does not influence operating theatre productivity via changes to surgical times. The impact of spinal anesthetic effects is limited to nonoperative times (e.g., reducing anesthesia-controlled times by using a block room before the patient enters the operating room).

Study registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42023461952 ); first submitted 8 September 2023.

Purpose: The combination of acetaminophen with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug is the cornerstone of perioperative multimodal analgesia. These drugs can be administered intravenously or orally as premedication, consistent with the concept of pre-emptive and preventive analgesia. We aimed to assess the environmental impact of their intravenous and oral administration in a French university hospital.

Methods: We carried out a life cycle assessment to determine the amount of greenhouse gas emissions and depletion of water resources resulting from the oral vs intravenous administration of 1 g acetaminophen and 50 mg ketoprofen. We assessed two schemes of intravenous administration, depending on the use of the same or a different infusion set for each drug.

Results: At our centre, the intravenous administration of both drugs was associated with the emission of 444-556 g CO₂ equivalent (CO₂e), and with 9.8-12.2 L of water waste. The oral administration of both drugs generated 8.36 g of CO₂e emissions and consumed 1.16 L of water. At a national level, the switch from intravenous to oral premedication of the drugs could avoid the emission of 2,900-3,700 tons of CO₂e and the waste of 58,000-74,000 m³ of water each year.

Conclusion: This eco-audit indicates that oral administration of acetaminophen and ketoprofen results in significantly lower carbon emissions and water consumption than intravenous administration. These findings highlight the importance of using the oral route for most patients, limiting intravenous administration for those with specific needs because of higher environmental impact and cost.