Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2026.2620233
Robin van Lier, Noah Stuyck, Patricia Poels, Bert Vandenberk, Rik Willems
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are lifesaving devices that prevent sudden cardiac death in patients at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, if ICDs are not deactivated in the terminal phase of life, they may deliver shocks that can pose a problem during end-of-life care. While guidelines recommend initiating discussions on ICD deactivation early, in practice these conversations often take place too late or not at all.
Methods: A scoping review aimed at three key groups (patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals) was performed based on a search of PubMed and Embase conducted on June 9, 2024, focusing on studies examining attitudes towards ICD deactivation. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals.
Results: 32 articles were included: 16 focused on patients, 10 on professionals, 3 on relatives, and 3 on combinations of study groups. Findings revealed significant knowledge gaps. Many patients and relatives were unaware that ICD deactivation was an option. Healthcare professionals felt they lacked confidence in initiating discussions, citing time constraints and discomfort. A preference for shared decision-making was identified, although preferences varied. There was no consensus on the optimal timing for these discussions. All groups reported ethical and legal concerns about ICD deactivation.
Conclusion: This review emphasises the need for individualised ICD deactivation discussions. Enhancing communication, education, and training for healthcare professionals is essential. Timely, ongoing conversations about ICD deactivation should be integrated into routine care, ensuring decisions align with patient values, especially in the final stages of life.
{"title":"Attitudes of patients, relatives and professionals regarding deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a scoping review.","authors":"Robin van Lier, Noah Stuyck, Patricia Poels, Bert Vandenberk, Rik Willems","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2026.2620233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2620233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are lifesaving devices that prevent sudden cardiac death in patients at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, if ICDs are not deactivated in the terminal phase of life, they may deliver shocks that can pose a problem during end-of-life care. While guidelines recommend initiating discussions on ICD deactivation early, in practice these conversations often take place too late or not at all.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review aimed at three key groups (patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals) was performed based on a search of PubMed and Embase conducted on June 9, 2024, focusing on studies examining attitudes towards ICD deactivation. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 articles were included: 16 focused on patients, 10 on professionals, 3 on relatives, and 3 on combinations of study groups. Findings revealed significant knowledge gaps. Many patients and relatives were unaware that ICD deactivation was an option. Healthcare professionals felt they lacked confidence in initiating discussions, citing time constraints and discomfort. A preference for shared decision-making was identified, although preferences varied. There was no consensus on the optimal timing for these discussions. All groups reported ethical and legal concerns about ICD deactivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review emphasises the need for individualised ICD deactivation discussions. Enhancing communication, education, and training for healthcare professionals is essential. Timely, ongoing conversations about ICD deactivation should be integrated into routine care, ensuring decisions align with patient values, especially in the final stages of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146049953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2026.2620934
Mohamed El Mallouli, Ivan Dimov, Sohaib Mansour, Mohammed Mehdi Ngadi, Philippe Unger
{"title":"Severe mitral regurgitation with myocarditis and malignant eosinophilia with PDGFRB-NDE1 gene fusion.","authors":"Mohamed El Mallouli, Ivan Dimov, Sohaib Mansour, Mohammed Mehdi Ngadi, Philippe Unger","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2026.2620934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2620934","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146049904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2026.2617492
Irene Vandermeersch, Leen Van Langenhoven, Pierluigi Lesizza, Michiel Meylaers, Victor Van Lint, Dries Noé, Roxanne Van der Hauwaert, Reinier Petrus Van Otzel, Steven Jacobs, Peter Verbrugghe, Steffen Rex, Philippe Nuyens, Bart Meuris, Marie-Christine Herregods, Tom Adriaenssens, Christophe Dubois
Background: Ischaemic cerebrovascular events (CVEs) are a major complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Purpose: We aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for CVE at 30 days and 1 year after TAVI in a large, real-world patient cohort and evaluate the association of these events with all-cause mortality at 1 year.
Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at a single centre between April 2008 and February 2024 were included in the analysis. CVE were defined as a composite of stroke and transient ischaemic attack.
Results: One thousand and three patients (mean age 81.8 ± 7.0 years, 52.6% male, median EuroSCORE II 6% [Q1 = 3.51%; Q3 = 10.9%]) underwent TAVI with a self-expandable valve (SEV) (n = 275; 27.4%) or balloon-expandable valve (BEV) (n = 728; 72.6%). The cumulative incidence of CVE was 3.6% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = [2.6%; 4.9%], n = 36) at 30 days (77.8% within 48 h) and 6.2% (95% CI = [4.8%; 7.8%], n = 62) at 1 year. Risk factors associated with a lower risk of CVE at 30 days included BEV vs. SEV (OR 0.32 [0.16-0.63], p = 0.0009) and larger baseline aortic valve area (AVA) (ORUnit = 0.1 cm2 0.74 [0.61-0.91], p = 0.0035), while the risk was higher in the case of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 3.19 [1.18-8.59], p = 0.0218), diabetes (OR 2.00 [1.01-3.97], p = 0.0484), and conversion to sternotomy (OR 16.57 [4.62-59.48], p < 0.0001). Analysis at 1-year follow-up identified the same associations. Finally, the occurrence of CVE significantly increased 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 2.44 [1.32-4.50], p = 0.0045).
Conclusions: CVE after TAVI were associated with double the odds of 1-year all-cause mortality. Risk factors associated with CVE include the use of a SEV, new-onset AF, diabetes, conversion to sternotomy, and a smaller AVA.
背景:缺血性脑血管事件(CVEs)是严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的主要并发症。目的:我们旨在确定TAVI术后30天和1年CVE的发生率和危险因素,并评估这些事件与1年全因死亡率的关系。方法:2008年4月至2024年2月在同一中心连续接受TAVI的所有患者纳入分析。CVE被定义为脑卒中和短暂性缺血发作的组合。结果:1303例患者(平均年龄81.8±7.0岁,男性占52.6%,EuroSCORE II中位数占6% [Q1 = 3.51%; Q3 = 10.9%])行TAVI伴自膨胀瓣膜(SEV) (n = 275; 27.4%)或球囊膨胀瓣膜(BEV) (n = 728; 72.6%)。CVE的累积发生率为3.6%(95%置信区间(95% CI) = [2.6%;4.9%), n = 36) 30天在48 h(77.8%)和6.2% (95% CI = (4.8%; 7.8%), n = 62)在1年。与30天CVE风险较低相关的危险因素包括BEV vs SEV (OR 0.32 [0.16-0.63], p = 0.0009)和基线主动脉瓣面积(AVA)较大(ORUnit = 0.1 cm2 0.74 [0.61-0.91], p = 0.0035),而新发房颤(AF) (OR 3.19 [1.18-8.59], p = 0.0218)、糖尿病(OR 2.00 [1.01-3.97], p = 0.0484)和改用胸骨切开术(OR 16.57 [4.62-59.48], p = 0.0045)的风险较高。结论:TAVI后CVE与1年全因死亡率的两倍相关。与CVE相关的危险因素包括使用SEV、新发房颤、糖尿病、转换为胸骨切开术和较小的AVA。
{"title":"Incidence, risk factors and prognostic impact of cerebrovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.","authors":"Irene Vandermeersch, Leen Van Langenhoven, Pierluigi Lesizza, Michiel Meylaers, Victor Van Lint, Dries Noé, Roxanne Van der Hauwaert, Reinier Petrus Van Otzel, Steven Jacobs, Peter Verbrugghe, Steffen Rex, Philippe Nuyens, Bart Meuris, Marie-Christine Herregods, Tom Adriaenssens, Christophe Dubois","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2026.2617492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2617492","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischaemic cerebrovascular events (CVEs) are a major complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for CVE at 30 days and 1 year after TAVI in a large, real-world patient cohort and evaluate the association of these events with all-cause mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at a single centre between April 2008 and February 2024 were included in the analysis. CVE were defined as a composite of stroke and transient ischaemic attack.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and three patients (mean age 81.8 ± 7.0 years, 52.6% male, median EuroSCORE II 6% [<i>Q</i>1 = 3.51%; <i>Q</i>3 = 10.9%]) underwent TAVI with a self-expandable valve (SEV) (<i>n</i> = 275; 27.4%) or balloon-expandable valve (BEV) (<i>n</i> = 728; 72.6%). The cumulative incidence of CVE was 3.6% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = [2.6%; 4.9%], <i>n</i> = 36) at 30 days (77.8% within 48 h) and 6.2% (95% CI = [4.8%; 7.8%], <i>n</i> = 62) at 1 year. Risk factors associated with a lower risk of CVE at 30 days included BEV vs. SEV (OR 0.32 [0.16-0.63], <i>p</i> = 0.0009) and larger baseline aortic valve area (AVA) (OR<sub>Unit = 0.1 cm2</sub> 0.74 [0.61-0.91], <i>p</i> = 0.0035), while the risk was higher in the case of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 3.19 [1.18-8.59], <i>p</i> = 0.0218), diabetes (OR 2.00 [1.01-3.97], <i>p</i> = 0.0484), and conversion to sternotomy (OR 16.57 [4.62-59.48], <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Analysis at 1-year follow-up identified the same associations. Finally, the occurrence of CVE significantly increased 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 2.44 [1.32-4.50], <i>p</i> = 0.0045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CVE after TAVI were associated with double the odds of 1-year all-cause mortality. Risk factors associated with CVE include the use of a SEV, new-onset AF, diabetes, conversion to sternotomy, and a smaller AVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2026.2620928
Jiayi Chen
{"title":"The letter to editor regarding \"Sex-specific differences between C-reactive protein and appendicular lean soft tissue index in heart failure: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey\".","authors":"Jiayi Chen","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2026.2620928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2620928","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2026.2617527
Pietro Palmisano, Gabriele Dell'Era, Antonio Strangio, Antonio Scalone, Pier Luigi Pellegrino, Salvatore Bonanno, Claudia Amellone, Luca Santini, Roberto Floris, Martina Nesti, Gianfranco Mitacchione, Marco Schiavone, Antonio Parlavecchio, Antonio Rossillo, Daniele Sacchetta, Giovanni Rovaris, Paolo Di Donna, Massimiliano Manfrin, Angelo Di Grazia, Giovanni Volpato, Teresa Strisciuglio, Federico Ferraris, Francesco Notaristefano, Matteo Ziacchi, Francesco Zanon, Giovanni Coluccia
Background: Conduction system pacing (CSP) is an increasingly used approach for physiological ventricular pacing. We conducted a nationwide survey aimed to evaluate the adoption of CSP in the Italian clinical practice.
Methods: An online survey consisting of 20 questions, distributed to Italian centres performing cardiac pacing, was conducted from October to November 2024.
Results: A total of 136 centres took part in the survey (37% of all arrhythmia centres operating in Italy), 119 of which (86%) declared to perform CSP implants. The lack of trained operators was the main perceived barrier to CSP adoption, reported by 58% of the centres that did not perform CSP implants. Forty-seven percent of the centres had started performing CSP implants within the last 2 years. Sixty-three percent of the operators declared to be independent in CSP implant procedures, however, 45% of them still had little experience, having performed ≤10 procedures. The median rate of pacemakers (PMs) with CSP on the total PMs implanted per year was 10%. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was the pacing strategy used in 98% of CSP implants. The main indication for CSP implantation was atrioventricular block (46%), followed by cardiac resynchronisation therapy (17%), ablate and pace (15%), and upgrading (14%).
Conclusions: CSP appears to be widely used in the Italian clinical practice, although most centres have only begun adopting it in the past few years, and many operators are still not very experienced. LBBAP is the CSP strategy most commonly chosen by the Italian operators.
{"title":"Conduction system pacing in the Italian clinical practice: results of a nationwide survey.","authors":"Pietro Palmisano, Gabriele Dell'Era, Antonio Strangio, Antonio Scalone, Pier Luigi Pellegrino, Salvatore Bonanno, Claudia Amellone, Luca Santini, Roberto Floris, Martina Nesti, Gianfranco Mitacchione, Marco Schiavone, Antonio Parlavecchio, Antonio Rossillo, Daniele Sacchetta, Giovanni Rovaris, Paolo Di Donna, Massimiliano Manfrin, Angelo Di Grazia, Giovanni Volpato, Teresa Strisciuglio, Federico Ferraris, Francesco Notaristefano, Matteo Ziacchi, Francesco Zanon, Giovanni Coluccia","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2026.2617527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2617527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conduction system pacing (CSP) is an increasingly used approach for physiological ventricular pacing. We conducted a nationwide survey aimed to evaluate the adoption of CSP in the Italian clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey consisting of 20 questions, distributed to Italian centres performing cardiac pacing, was conducted from October to November 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 centres took part in the survey (37% of all arrhythmia centres operating in Italy), 119 of which (86%) declared to perform CSP implants. The lack of trained operators was the main perceived barrier to CSP adoption, reported by 58% of the centres that did not perform CSP implants. Forty-seven percent of the centres had started performing CSP implants within the last 2 years. Sixty-three percent of the operators declared to be independent in CSP implant procedures, however, 45% of them still had little experience, having performed ≤10 procedures. The median rate of pacemakers (PMs) with CSP on the total PMs implanted per year was 10%. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was the pacing strategy used in 98% of CSP implants. The main indication for CSP implantation was atrioventricular block (46%), followed by cardiac resynchronisation therapy (17%), ablate and pace (15%), and upgrading (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CSP appears to be widely used in the Italian clinical practice, although most centres have only begun adopting it in the past few years, and many operators are still not very experienced. LBBAP is the CSP strategy most commonly chosen by the Italian operators.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146016898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2025.2597115
Lijuan Yang, Jiafang Wu, Hongzhang Lu
Objective: To explore the susceptibility to aortic dissection in an SSc mouse model and identify potentially related markers.
Methods: Thirty-six female BALB/C mice were divided into experimental, control, and intervention groups (12 each). SSc was induced in the experimental and intervention groups using bleomycin, while the control group received phosphate-buffered saline. The intervention group additionally received MMP inhibitor SD1776. All groups were then subjected to angiotensin II injections to induce aortic dissection. Histopathological changes in the aortic wall and MMP expression levels were analysed using immunohistochemistry and western blotting.
Results: Mice with induced SSc showed more severe non-inflammatory degenerative changes in the aortic media, indicating increased susceptibility to aortic dissection. The experimental group exhibited higher MMP expression (MMP9, MMP2) compared to the intervention and control groups(p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in IL6 expression among the groups(p > 0.05). TIMP-1 expression was significantly higher in both the SSc and intervention groups compared to the control group(p < 0.05), suggesting a compensatory response to increased MMP activity.
Conclusions: Mice with SSc were more prone to aortic dissection, potentially due to enhanced MMP activity in the aortic wall, underlining the importance of MMPs in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection in connective tissue diseases and indicating a pathway for future therapeutic interventions by targeting MMPs to mitigate the risk of aortic dissection in patients with SSc.
目的:探讨SSc小鼠主动脉夹层的易感性,并鉴定相关标志物。方法:将36只雌性BALB/C小鼠分为实验组、对照组和干预组,每组12只。实验组和干预组采用博来霉素诱导SSc,对照组采用磷酸盐缓冲盐水。干预组在对照组基础上给予MMP抑制剂SD1776。各组均注射血管紧张素II诱导主动脉夹层。应用免疫组织化学和western blotting分析主动脉壁组织病理学变化和MMP表达水平。结果:诱导SSc小鼠主动脉介质出现更严重的非炎性退行性改变,表明对主动脉夹层的易感性增加。实验组MMP (MMP9、MMP2)表达高于干预组和对照组(p p > 0.05)。与对照组相比,SSc组和干预组的TIMP-1表达均显著升高(p结论:SSc小鼠更容易发生主动脉夹层,可能是由于主动脉壁MMP活性增强,强调了MMPs在结缔组织疾病主动脉夹层发病机制中的重要性,并为未来通过靶向MMPs来减轻SSc患者主动脉夹层风险的治疗干预提供了途径。
{"title":"From inflammation to degeneration: role of MMPs, IL6, and TIMP-1 in systemic sclerosis and aortic dissection.","authors":"Lijuan Yang, Jiafang Wu, Hongzhang Lu","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2025.2597115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2597115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the susceptibility to aortic dissection in an SSc mouse model and identify potentially related markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six female BALB/C mice were divided into experimental, control, and intervention groups (12 each). SSc was induced in the experimental and intervention groups using bleomycin, while the control group received phosphate-buffered saline. The intervention group additionally received MMP inhibitor SD1776. All groups were then subjected to angiotensin II injections to induce aortic dissection. Histopathological changes in the aortic wall and MMP expression levels were analysed using immunohistochemistry and western blotting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mice with induced SSc showed more severe non-inflammatory degenerative changes in the aortic media, indicating increased susceptibility to aortic dissection. The experimental group exhibited higher MMP expression (MMP9, MMP2) compared to the intervention and control groups(<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in IL6 expression among the groups(<i>p</i> > 0.05). TIMP-1 expression was significantly higher in both the SSc and intervention groups compared to the control group(<i>p</i> < 0.05), suggesting a compensatory response to increased MMP activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mice with SSc were more prone to aortic dissection, potentially due to enhanced MMP activity in the aortic wall, underlining the importance of MMPs in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection in connective tissue diseases and indicating a pathway for future therapeutic interventions by targeting MMPs to mitigate the risk of aortic dissection in patients with SSc.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}