Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-157
Mostafa M Sayed, Ahmed Shawkat Abdelmohsen, Mostafa Ibrahim, Mohamad Raafat
Backgrounds/aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains the most common therapeutic strategy used for cholecystocholedocholithiasis (CCL). Recently, single-stage ERCP + LC has gained popularity for treating CCL due to patient satisfaction and financial considerations. In this study, we aimed to compare the feasibility and efficacy of the two variants of single-stage ERCP + LC (starting with ERCP followed by LC versus starting with LC followed by ERCP) for treatment of CCL.
Methods: A total of 115 patients who underwent single-stage ERCP + LC for CCL from January 2021 to December 2023 were enrolled in a retrospective comparative cohort study. These patients were divided into two groups: Group A (ERCP-first approach) and Group B (LC-first approach).
Results: Patients in Group A had a common bile duct clearance rate of 88.2%, which was comparable to the 95.7% observed in Group B (p = 0.163). The mean duration of the ERCP procedure was comparable between the two groups (43.3 ± 11.8 vs 39.5 ± 13.5 minutes; p = 0.112). However, the mean duration of the LC procedure was significantly longer in Group A than in Group B (41.2 ± 8.98 vs 37.2 ± 12.2 minutes; p = 0.045). The mean total operative time for the combined ERCP + LC was significantly longer in Group A compared to Group B (81.9 ± 16.7 vs 75.1 ± 19.3 minutes; p = 0.046). Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 4 patients in Group A and in 2 patients in Group B (p = 0.701).
Conclusions: Both LC-1st approach and ERCP-1st approach are feasible and highly effective for treating CCL through single-stage ERCP + LC. However, the LC-1st approach has the advantage of a shorter operative time.
背景/目的:内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)仍然是胆囊胆总管结石(CCL)最常用的治疗策略。最近,由于患者满意度和经济考虑,单期ERCP + LC治疗CCL越来越受欢迎。在本研究中,我们旨在比较两种单期ERCP + LC(开始ERCP后LC与开始LC后ERCP)治疗CCL的可行性和疗效。方法:从2021年1月至2023年12月,共有115例接受单期ERCP + LC治疗CCL的患者纳入回顾性比较队列研究。这些患者分为两组:A组(ercp优先入路)和B组(lc优先入路)。结果:A组患者胆总管清除率为88.2%,与B组的95.7%相当(p = 0.163)。ERCP手术的平均持续时间在两组之间具有可比性(43.3±11.8 vs 39.5±13.5分钟;P = 0.112)。然而,LC过程的平均持续时间A组明显长于B组(41.2±8.98 vs 37.2±12.2分钟;P = 0.045)。ERCP + LC联合手术的平均总手术时间A组明显长于B组(81.9±16.7 vs 75.1±19.3分钟);P = 0.046)。ercp术后胰腺炎A组4例,B组2例(p = 0.701)。结论:LC-1入路和ERCP-1入路对于单期ERCP + LC治疗CCL均是可行且高效的。然而,lc -1入路的优点是手术时间较短。
{"title":"Single-stage laparoendoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A retrospective study comparing starting with ERCP versus with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","authors":"Mostafa M Sayed, Ahmed Shawkat Abdelmohsen, Mostafa Ibrahim, Mohamad Raafat","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-157","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains the most common therapeutic strategy used for cholecystocholedocholithiasis (CCL). Recently, single-stage ERCP + LC has gained popularity for treating CCL due to patient satisfaction and financial considerations. In this study, we aimed to compare the feasibility and efficacy of the two variants of single-stage ERCP + LC (starting with ERCP followed by LC versus starting with LC followed by ERCP) for treatment of CCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 115 patients who underwent single-stage ERCP + LC for CCL from January 2021 to December 2023 were enrolled in a retrospective comparative cohort study. These patients were divided into two groups: Group A (ERCP-first approach) and Group B (LC-first approach).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in Group A had a common bile duct clearance rate of 88.2%, which was comparable to the 95.7% observed in Group B (<i>p</i> = 0.163). The mean duration of the ERCP procedure was comparable between the two groups (43.3 ± 11.8 vs 39.5 ± 13.5 minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.112). However, the mean duration of the LC procedure was significantly longer in Group A than in Group B (41.2 ± 8.98 vs 37.2 ± 12.2 minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.045). The mean total operative time for the combined ERCP + LC was significantly longer in Group A compared to Group B (81.9 ± 16.7 vs 75.1 ± 19.3 minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.046). Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 4 patients in Group A and in 2 patients in Group B (<i>p</i> = 0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both LC-1st approach and ERCP-1st approach are feasible and highly effective for treating CCL through single-stage ERCP + LC. However, the LC-1st approach has the advantage of a shorter operative time.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830901/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142878740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2024-09-19DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-149
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Comment on: \"Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy\".","authors":"Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-149","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-149","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"95-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-153
Sunghae Park, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Sanghoon Lee, Jae-Won Joh, Jinsoo Rhu
Backgrounds/aims: While large-for-size syndrome is uncommon in liver transplantation (LT), it can result in fatal outcome. To prevent such fatality, we manufactured 3D-printed intra-abdominal cavity replicas to provide intuitive understanding of the sizes of the graft and the patient's abdomen in patients with small body size between July 2020 and February 2022.
Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared between patients using our 3D model during LT, and patients who underwent LT without 3D model by using 1 : 5 ratio propensity score-matched analysis.
Results: After matching, a total of 20 patients using 3D-printed abdominal cavity model and 100 patients of the control group were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complication (50.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.356) and the incidence of large-for-size syndrome (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.599). Overall survival of the 3D-printed group was similar to that of the control group (p = 0.665), but graft survival was significantly superior in the 3D-printed group, compared to the control group (p = 0.034).
Conclusions: Since it showed better graft survival, as well as low cost and short production time, our 3D-printing protocol can be a feasible option for patients with small abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome after LT.
{"title":"Improved graft survival by using three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation.","authors":"Sunghae Park, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Sanghoon Lee, Jae-Won Joh, Jinsoo Rhu","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-153","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>While large-for-size syndrome is uncommon in liver transplantation (LT), it can result in fatal outcome. To prevent such fatality, we manufactured 3D-printed intra-abdominal cavity replicas to provide intuitive understanding of the sizes of the graft and the patient's abdomen in patients with small body size between July 2020 and February 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes were compared between patients using our 3D model during LT, and patients who underwent LT without 3D model by using 1 : 5 ratio propensity score-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, a total of 20 patients using 3D-printed abdominal cavity model and 100 patients of the control group were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complication (50.0% vs. 64.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.356) and the incidence of large-for-size syndrome (0% vs. 7%, <i>p</i> = 0.599). Overall survival of the 3D-printed group was similar to that of the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.665), but graft survival was significantly superior in the 3D-printed group, compared to the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since it showed better graft survival, as well as low cost and short production time, our 3D-printing protocol can be a feasible option for patients with small abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome after LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142333583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-196
Jaewon Lee, YoungRok Choi, Nam-Joon Yi, Jae-Yoon Kim, Su Young Hong, Jeong-Moo Lee, Suk Kyun Hong, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh
Backgrounds/aims: Liver transplantation (LT) is now a critical, life-saving treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite its significant benefits, biliary complications (BCs) continue to be a major cause of postoperative morbidity. This study evaluates the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the common bile duct (CBD) utilizing near-infrared indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, and examines its association with the incidence of BCs within three months post-LT.
Methods: This investigation analyzed data from nine living donor LT (LDLT) recipients who were administered 0.05 mg/kg of ICG prior to bile duct anastomosis. Real-time perfusion of the CBD was recorded for three minutes using an ICG camera, and FI was quantified using Image J (National Institutes of Health). Key parameters assessed included F max, F1/2 max, T1/2 max, and the slope (F max/T max) to evaluate the fluorescence response.
Results: BCs occurred in two out of nine patients. These two patients exhibited the longest T1/2 max values, which were linked with lower slope values, implicating a potential relationship between extended T1/2 max, reduced slope, and the occurrence of postoperative BCs.
Conclusions: The study indicates that ICG fluorescence imaging may serve as an effective tool for assessing bile duct perfusion in LDLT patients. While the data suggest that an extended T1/2 max and lower slope may correlate with an increased risk of BCs, further validation through larger studies is required to confirm the predictive value of ICG fluorescence imaging in this setting.
{"title":"Feasibility of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to predict biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation: A pilot study.","authors":"Jaewon Lee, YoungRok Choi, Nam-Joon Yi, Jae-Yoon Kim, Su Young Hong, Jeong-Moo Lee, Suk Kyun Hong, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-196","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Liver transplantation (LT) is now a critical, life-saving treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite its significant benefits, biliary complications (BCs) continue to be a major cause of postoperative morbidity. This study evaluates the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the common bile duct (CBD) utilizing near-infrared indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, and examines its association with the incidence of BCs within three months post-LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation analyzed data from nine living donor LT (LDLT) recipients who were administered 0.05 mg/kg of ICG prior to bile duct anastomosis. Real-time perfusion of the CBD was recorded for three minutes using an ICG camera, and FI was quantified using Image J (National Institutes of Health). Key parameters assessed included F max, F<sub>1/2</sub> max, T<sub>1/2</sub> max, and the slope (F max/T max) to evaluate the fluorescence response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCs occurred in two out of nine patients. These two patients exhibited the longest T<sub>1/2</sub> max values, which were linked with lower slope values, implicating a potential relationship between extended T<sub>1/2</sub> max, reduced slope, and the occurrence of postoperative BCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicates that ICG fluorescence imaging may serve as an effective tool for assessing bile duct perfusion in LDLT patients. While the data suggest that an extended T<sub>1/2</sub> max and lower slope may correlate with an increased risk of BCs, further validation through larger studies is required to confirm the predictive value of ICG fluorescence imaging in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2024-12-30DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-169
Sushma Agrawal, Rahul, Mohammed Naved Alam, Neeraj Rastogi, Ashish Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Prabhakar Mishra
Backgrounds/aims: Given the high mortality associated with gallbladder cancer (GBC), the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. We audited our data over an 11-year period to assess the impact of AT.
Methods: This study included all patients who underwent curative resection for GBC from 2007 to 2017. Analyses were conducted of clinicopathological characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative therapeutic records. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) were evaluated against surgery alone using SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis.
Results: The median age of patients (n = 142) was 50 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 93, 34, and 30 months with CT, CTRT, and surgery alone respectively (p = 0.612). Multivariate analysis indicated that only disease stage and microscopically involved margins significantly impacted OS and disease-free survival (DFS). CT showed increased effectiveness across all prognostic subsets, except for stage 4 and margin-positive resections. Following propensity score matching, median DFS and OS were higher in the CT group than in the CTRT group, although the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Radically resected GBC patients appear to benefit more from adjuvant CT, while CTRT should be reserved for cases with high-risk features.
{"title":"Propensity score analysis of adjuvant therapy in radically resected gallbladder cancers: A real world experience from a regional cancer center.","authors":"Sushma Agrawal, Rahul, Mohammed Naved Alam, Neeraj Rastogi, Ashish Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Prabhakar Mishra","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-169","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Given the high mortality associated with gallbladder cancer (GBC), the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. We audited our data over an 11-year period to assess the impact of AT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included all patients who underwent curative resection for GBC from 2007 to 2017. Analyses were conducted of clinicopathological characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative therapeutic records. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) were evaluated against surgery alone using SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients (n = 142) was 50 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 93, 34, and 30 months with CT, CTRT, and surgery alone respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.612). Multivariate analysis indicated that only disease stage and microscopically involved margins significantly impacted OS and disease-free survival (DFS). CT showed increased effectiveness across all prognostic subsets, except for stage 4 and margin-positive resections. Following propensity score matching, median DFS and OS were higher in the CT group than in the CTRT group, although the differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radically resected GBC patients appear to benefit more from adjuvant CT, while CTRT should be reserved for cases with high-risk features.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"38-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142904208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-137
Jae Hwan Jeong, Seung Soo Hong, Munseok Choi, Seoung Yoon Rho, Pejman Radkani, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Yuichi Nagakawa, Minoru Tanabe, Daisuke Asano, Chang Moo Kang
Backgrounds/aims: In recent years, many minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to reduce the number of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes. ArtiSential® is a new multi-degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instrument that incorporates the ergonomic features of robotic surgery, potentially overcoming the spatial limitations of laparoscopic surgery. ArtiSential® LC can be performed using only two ports. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of ArtiSential® LC with those of single-fulcrum LC.
Methods: This retrospective study compared ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC among LCs performed for gallbladder (GB) stones at the same center, analyzing the basic characteristics of patients; intraoperative outcomes, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative GB rupture; and postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.
Results: A total of 88 and 63 patients underwent ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC for GB stones, respectively. Analysis showed that ArtiSential® LC resulted in significantly fewer cases of surgeries longer than 60 minutes (30 vs. 35 min, p = 0.009) and intraoperative GB ruptures (2 vs. 10, p = 0.007). In terms of postoperative outcomes, ArtiSential® LC showed better results in the respective visual analog scale (VAS) scores immediately after surgery (2.59 vs. 3.73, p < 0.001), and before discharge (1.44 vs. 2.02, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: ArtiSential® LC showed better results in terms of surgical outcomes, especially postoperative pain. Thus, ArtiSential® LC is considered the better option for patients, compared to single-fulcrum LC.
{"title":"ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus singlefulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?","authors":"Jae Hwan Jeong, Seung Soo Hong, Munseok Choi, Seoung Yoon Rho, Pejman Radkani, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Yuichi Nagakawa, Minoru Tanabe, Daisuke Asano, Chang Moo Kang","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-137","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>In recent years, many minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to reduce the number of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes. ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> is a new multi-degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instrument that incorporates the ergonomic features of robotic surgery, potentially overcoming the spatial limitations of laparoscopic surgery. ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC can be performed using only two ports. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC with those of single-fulcrum LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study compared ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC and single-fulcrum LC among LCs performed for gallbladder (GB) stones at the same center, analyzing the basic characteristics of patients; intraoperative outcomes, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative GB rupture; and postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 and 63 patients underwent ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC and single-fulcrum LC for GB stones, respectively. Analysis showed that ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC resulted in significantly fewer cases of surgeries longer than 60 minutes (30 vs. 35 min, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and intraoperative GB ruptures (2 vs. 10, <i>p</i> = 0.007). In terms of postoperative outcomes, ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC showed better results in the respective visual analog scale (VAS) scores immediately after surgery (2.59 vs. 3.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and before discharge (1.44 vs. 2.02, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC showed better results in terms of surgical outcomes, especially postoperative pain. Thus, ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> LC is considered the better option for patients, compared to single-fulcrum LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28Epub Date: 2024-10-15DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-147
Jun Hyung Kim, Hyung Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, Ji Hae Nahm, Joon Seong Park
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are uncommon pancreatic tumors that primarily affect young females. We report a case of a 24-year-old female diagnosed with SPN and liver metastasis during a routine examination. Imaging revealed an 8-cm pancreatic mass with multiple liver metastases. Histopathology confirmed SPN. Subsequent next-generation sequencing revealed a CTNNB1 mutation. The patient underwent a total pancreatectomy with splenectomy, right hemihepatectomy, and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. Two years after the surgery, she remained complication-free. She is under regular surveillance. This case underscores the importance of early detection and comprehensive management of SPN.
{"title":"A rare case of a large solid pseudopapillary neoplasm with extensive liver metastasis.","authors":"Jun Hyung Kim, Hyung Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, Ji Hae Nahm, Joon Seong Park","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-147","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are uncommon pancreatic tumors that primarily affect young females. We report a case of a 24-year-old female diagnosed with SPN and liver metastasis during a routine examination. Imaging revealed an 8-cm pancreatic mass with multiple liver metastases. Histopathology confirmed SPN. Subsequent next-generation sequencing revealed a <i>CTNNB1</i> mutation. The patient underwent a total pancreatectomy with splenectomy, right hemihepatectomy, and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. Two years after the surgery, she remained complication-free. She is under regular surveillance. This case underscores the importance of early detection and comprehensive management of SPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"83-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-30Epub Date: 2024-08-20DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-117
Kil Hwan Kim, Ju Ik Moon, Jae Woo Park, Yunghun You, Hae Il Jung, Hanlim Choi, Si Eun Hwang, Sungho Jo
Backgrounds/aims: Systematic investigations into the prognostic impact of the longitudinal tumor location in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remain insufficient. To address the limitations of our pilot study, we conducted a multicenter investigation to clarify the impact of the longitudinal tumor location on the oncological outcomes of GBC.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 372 patients undergoing radical resections for GBC from January 2010 to December 2019 across seven hospitals that belong to the Daejeon-Chungcheong branch of the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Patients were divided into GBC in the fundus/body (FB-GBC) and GBC in the neck/cystic duct (NC-GBC) groups, based on the longitudinal tumor location.
Results: Of 372 patients, 282 had FB-GBC, while 90 had NC-GBC. NC-GBC was associated with more frequent elevation of preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels, requirement for more extensive surgery, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, more frequent lymphovascular and perineural invasion, lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed these findings, showing lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse survival rates in the NC-GBC group. Multivariate analysis identified elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and non-R0 resection as independent prognostic factors, but not longitudinal tumor location.
Conclusions: NC-GBC exhibits more frequent elevation of preoperative CA 19-9 levels, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, lower R0 resection rates, and poorer overall and disease-free survival rates, compared to FB-GBC. However, the longitudinal tumor location was not analyzed as an independent prognostic factor.
{"title":"Impact of longitudinal tumor location on postoperative outcomes in gallbladder cancer: Fundus and body vs. neck and cystic duct, a retrospective multicenter study.","authors":"Kil Hwan Kim, Ju Ik Moon, Jae Woo Park, Yunghun You, Hae Il Jung, Hanlim Choi, Si Eun Hwang, Sungho Jo","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-117","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Systematic investigations into the prognostic impact of the longitudinal tumor location in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remain insufficient. To address the limitations of our pilot study, we conducted a multicenter investigation to clarify the impact of the longitudinal tumor location on the oncological outcomes of GBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 372 patients undergoing radical resections for GBC from January 2010 to December 2019 across seven hospitals that belong to the Daejeon-Chungcheong branch of the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Patients were divided into GBC in the fundus/body (FB-GBC) and GBC in the neck/cystic duct (NC-GBC) groups, based on the longitudinal tumor location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 372 patients, 282 had FB-GBC, while 90 had NC-GBC. NC-GBC was associated with more frequent elevation of preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels, requirement for more extensive surgery, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, more frequent lymphovascular and perineural invasion, lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed these findings, showing lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse survival rates in the NC-GBC group. Multivariate analysis identified elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and non-R0 resection as independent prognostic factors, but not longitudinal tumor location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NC-GBC exhibits more frequent elevation of preoperative CA 19-9 levels, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, lower R0 resection rates, and poorer overall and disease-free survival rates, compared to FB-GBC. However, the longitudinal tumor location was not analyzed as an independent prognostic factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"474-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599822/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-30Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-082
Dong Hyun Shin, Munseok Choi, Seoung Yoon Rho, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Chang Moo Kang
Backgrounds/aims: This study aimed to compare the minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with venous vascular resection (MI-PDVR) and open pancreatoduodenectomy with venous vascular resection (O-PDVR) for periampullary cancer.
Methods: Data of 124 patients who underwent PDVR (45 MI-PDVR, 79 O-PDVR) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2023, was retrospectively reviewed.
Results: MI-PDVR is significantly better than O-PDVR in terms of perioperative outcomes (median operation time [452.69 minutes vs. 543.91 minutes; p = 0.004], estimated blood loss [410.44 mL vs. 747.59 mL; p < 0.01], intraoperative transfusion rate [2 cases vs. 18 cases; p = 0.01], and hospital stay [18.16 days vs. 23.91 days; p = 0.008]). The complications until the discharge day showed no significant difference between the two groups (Clavien-Dindo < 3, 84.4% vs. 82.3%; Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, 15.6% vs. 17.7%; p = 0.809). In terms of long-term oncological outcomes, there was no statistical difference in overall survival (OS, 51.55 months [95% CI: 35.95-67.14] vs. median 49.92 months [95% CI: 40.97-58.87]; p = 0.340) and disease-free survival (DFS, median 35.06 months [95% CI: 21.47-48.65] vs. median 38.77 months [95% CI: 29.80-47.75]; p = 0.585), between the two groups. Long-term oncological outcomes for subgroup analysis focusing on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma also showed no statistical differences in OS (40.86 months [95% CI: 34.45-47.27] vs. 48.48 months [95% CI: 38.16-58.59]; p = 0.270) and DFS (24.42 months [95% CI: 17.03-31.85] vs. 34.35 months, [95% CI: 25.44-43.27]; p = 0.740).
Conclusions: MI-PDVR can provide better perioperative outcomes than O-PDVR, and has similar oncological impact.
背景/目的:本研究旨在比较微创胰十二指肠切除加静脉血管切除术(MI-PDVR)和开放胰十二指肠切除加静脉血管切除术(O-PDVR)治疗胰周癌的效果:回顾性分析了2016年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受胰十二指肠静脉血管切除术的124例患者(45例MI-PDVR,79例O-PDVR)的数据:就围术期结果而言,MI-PDVR明显优于O-PDVR(中位手术时间[452.69分钟 vs. 543.91分钟;p = 0.004],估计失血量[410.44毫升 vs. 747.59毫升;p < 0.01],术中输血率[2例 vs. 18例;p = 0.01],住院时间[18.16天 vs. 23.91天;p = 0.008])。两组患者在出院前的并发症无明显差异(Clavien-Dindo < 3,84.4% vs. 82.3%;Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3,15.6% vs. 17.7%;P = 0.809)。在长期肿瘤学结果方面,两组患者的总生存期(OS,51.55 个月 [95% CI:35.95-67.14] vs. 中位数 49.92 个月 [95% CI:40.97-58.87];P = 0.340)和无病生存期(DFS,中位数 35.06 个月 [95% CI:21.47-48.65] vs. 中位数 38.77 个月 [95% CI:29.80-47.75];P = 0.585)无统计学差异。胰腺导管腺癌亚组分析的长期肿瘤学结果显示,OS(40.86 个月 [95% CI:34.45-47.27] vs. 48.48 个月 [95% CI:38.16-58.59];p = 0.270)和 DFS(24.42 个月 [95% CI:17.03-31.85] vs. 34.35 个月,[95% CI:25.44-43.27];p = 0.740)也无统计学差异:结论:MI-PDVR能提供比O-PDVR更好的围手术期疗效,而且对肿瘤的影响相似。
{"title":"Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with combined venous vascular resection: A comparative analysis with open approach.","authors":"Dong Hyun Shin, Munseok Choi, Seoung Yoon Rho, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Chang Moo Kang","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-082","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with venous vascular resection (MI-PDVR) and open pancreatoduodenectomy with venous vascular resection (O-PDVR) for periampullary cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 124 patients who underwent PDVR (45 MI-PDVR, 79 O-PDVR) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2023, was retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MI-PDVR is significantly better than O-PDVR in terms of perioperative outcomes (median operation time [452.69 minutes vs. 543.91 minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.004], estimated blood loss [410.44 mL vs. 747.59 mL; <i>p</i> < 0.01], intraoperative transfusion rate [2 cases vs. 18 cases; <i>p</i> = 0.01], and hospital stay [18.16 days vs. 23.91 days; <i>p</i> = 0.008]). The complications until the discharge day showed no significant difference between the two groups (Clavien-Dindo < 3, 84.4% vs. 82.3%; Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, 15.6% vs. 17.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.809). In terms of long-term oncological outcomes, there was no statistical difference in overall survival (OS, 51.55 months [95% CI: 35.95-67.14] vs. median 49.92 months [95% CI: 40.97-58.87]; <i>p</i> = 0.340) and disease-free survival (DFS, median 35.06 months [95% CI: 21.47-48.65] vs. median 38.77 months [95% CI: 29.80-47.75]; <i>p</i> = 0.585), between the two groups. Long-term oncological outcomes for subgroup analysis focusing on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma also showed no statistical differences in OS (40.86 months [95% CI: 34.45-47.27] vs. 48.48 months [95% CI: 38.16-58.59]; <i>p</i> = 0.270) and DFS (24.42 months [95% CI: 17.03-31.85] vs. 34.35 months, [95% CI: 25.44-43.27]; <i>p</i> = 0.740).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MI-PDVR can provide better perioperative outcomes than O-PDVR, and has similar oncological impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"500-507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-30Epub Date: 2024-06-20DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-086
Sergio Cortese, Katherine Plua, Alejandro J Perez-Alonso, María Savoie Hontoria, David Pacheco, Natalia Zambudio Carroll, Manuel Ángel Barrera Gómez, José María Pérez Peña, Álvaro G Morales Taboada, María Fernández Martínez, Sergio Hernández Kakauridze, Ana María Matilla, José Ángel López Baena, José Manuel Asencio
Backgrounds/aims: Thirty percent of liver grafts in donors after brain death (DBD) in Spain are rejected by procurement surgeons owing to marginal graft quality. Poor donor indocyanine green (ICG) clearance has been associated with graft discard and malfunction. This study aimed to internally and externally validate the predictive value of ICG-plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) to reject grafts before donation and set a cut-off to avoid missing any potential effective donors.
Methods: Between March 2017 and August 2023, ICG clearance test was performed immediately before procurement in 71 DBD. The surgeon was blinded to test results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect independent predictors of graft discard. Discrimination and calibration of predictors were assessed and a cut-off with 100% specificity was set. External validation was performed on 17 donors evaluated by three other transplantation teams.
Results: In the training cohort, 30 of 71 grafts were discarded for transplantation. ICG-PDR was the only donor variable independently associated with graft discard. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for ICG-PDR was 0.875 (95% confidence interval: 0.768-0.947) and good calibration was observed. Below a PDR of 13.5%/min, no graft was accepted for transplantation. These results were successfully validated using the external cohort of donors.
Conclusions: ICG clearance test performed in DBD was internally and externally validated to predict liver graft discard. It could be used as a screening tool before donation to avoid unnecessary costs of travel and human resources.
{"title":"Internal and external validation of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate to discard liver grafts before procurement.","authors":"Sergio Cortese, Katherine Plua, Alejandro J Perez-Alonso, María Savoie Hontoria, David Pacheco, Natalia Zambudio Carroll, Manuel Ángel Barrera Gómez, José María Pérez Peña, Álvaro G Morales Taboada, María Fernández Martínez, Sergio Hernández Kakauridze, Ana María Matilla, José Ángel López Baena, José Manuel Asencio","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-086","DOIUrl":"10.14701/ahbps.24-086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Thirty percent of liver grafts in donors after brain death (DBD) in Spain are rejected by procurement surgeons owing to marginal graft quality. Poor donor indocyanine green (ICG) clearance has been associated with graft discard and malfunction. This study aimed to internally and externally validate the predictive value of ICG-plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) to reject grafts before donation and set a cut-off to avoid missing any potential effective donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2017 and August 2023, ICG clearance test was performed immediately before procurement in 71 DBD. The surgeon was blinded to test results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect independent predictors of graft discard. Discrimination and calibration of predictors were assessed and a cut-off with 100% specificity was set. External validation was performed on 17 donors evaluated by three other transplantation teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training cohort, 30 of 71 grafts were discarded for transplantation. ICG-PDR was the only donor variable independently associated with graft discard. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for ICG-PDR was 0.875 (95% confidence interval: 0.768-0.947) and good calibration was observed. Below a PDR of 13.5%/min, no graft was accepted for transplantation. These results were successfully validated using the external cohort of donors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG clearance test performed in DBD was internally and externally validated to predict liver graft discard. It could be used as a screening tool before donation to avoid unnecessary costs of travel and human resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"458-465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}