Sedat Yilmaz, Kutay Tezel, Ramazan Ocal, Turan Ilıca, Muhammet Cinar, Hakan Erdem, Salih Pay, Ayhan Dinc, Ismail Simsek
Although neurological involvement in Behçet's disease is not so uncommon, isolated spinal cord disease is quite rare and reported to be observed in about 2% of all cases with neurological involvement. Here we report a Behçet's patient with spinal cord disease presented with anterior spinal cord syndrome. This rare syndrome is caused by hypoperfusion of the anterior spinal artery and to our knowledge has not been previously reported in patients with Behçet's disease. This report defines the characteristic clinical features of this entity and emphasizes the importance of early immunosuppressive treatment and initiation of rehabilitation.
{"title":"Anterior spinal cord syndrome in a patient with Behçet's disease.","authors":"Sedat Yilmaz, Kutay Tezel, Ramazan Ocal, Turan Ilıca, Muhammet Cinar, Hakan Erdem, Salih Pay, Ayhan Dinc, Ismail Simsek","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although neurological involvement in Behçet's disease is not so uncommon, isolated spinal cord disease is quite rare and reported to be observed in about 2% of all cases with neurological involvement. Here we report a Behçet's patient with spinal cord disease presented with anterior spinal cord syndrome. This rare syndrome is caused by hypoperfusion of the anterior spinal artery and to our knowledge has not been previously reported in patients with Behçet's disease. This report defines the characteristic clinical features of this entity and emphasizes the importance of early immunosuppressive treatment and initiation of rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 2","pages":"120-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30832180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The recent increase in life expectancy is expected to bring about a concurrent rise in the number of proximal humerus fractures. Those presenting with significant displacement, osteoporosis, and comminution present distinct clinical challenges, and the optimal treatment of these injuries remains controversial. As implant technologies and treatment strategies continue to evolve, the role and appropriateness of certain operative and nonoperative treatment modalities are being debated. Prior concerns regarding humeral head viability forced many physicians to abandon operative management in favor of nonoperative modalities. However, with greater appreciation and understanding of the factors governing humeral head viability, operative intervention is increasingly used and investigated. Nevertheless, sub-optimal results with earlier implants continue to cloud the debate between nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. This paper will review historical considerations, biologic considerations, and implant considerations in the management of three-and four-part proximal humerus fractures.
{"title":"Three-and four-part proximal humerus fractures: evolution to operative care.","authors":"William Min, Roy I Davidovitch, Nirmal C Tejwani","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent increase in life expectancy is expected to bring about a concurrent rise in the number of proximal humerus fractures. Those presenting with significant displacement, osteoporosis, and comminution present distinct clinical challenges, and the optimal treatment of these injuries remains controversial. As implant technologies and treatment strategies continue to evolve, the role and appropriateness of certain operative and nonoperative treatment modalities are being debated. Prior concerns regarding humeral head viability forced many physicians to abandon operative management in favor of nonoperative modalities. However, with greater appreciation and understanding of the factors governing humeral head viability, operative intervention is increasingly used and investigated. Nevertheless, sub-optimal results with earlier implants continue to cloud the debate between nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. This paper will review historical considerations, biologic considerations, and implant considerations in the management of three-and four-part proximal humerus fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 1","pages":"25-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30835543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Operative fixation of distal radius fractures is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. However, there remains little consensus on the indications for operative versus nonoperative treatment of these injuries. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has recently published clinical practice guidelines to help guide management of these injuries. The purpose of this paper is to review the biomechanical and clinical retrospective and prospective data pertinent to the indications for operative management of distal radius fractures. Conflicting data exists as to the optimal management of these injuries, especially in patients over the age of 55. Although there is some evidence to support operative fixation of distal radius fractures, better longterm, prospective, randomized studies with validated patient outcome measures are needed to definitively establish the optimal method of treatment for these injuries.
{"title":"Indications for operative fixation of distal radius fractures: a review of the evidence.","authors":"Daniel K Laino, Nirmal Tejwani","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Operative fixation of distal radius fractures is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. However, there remains little consensus on the indications for operative versus nonoperative treatment of these injuries. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has recently published clinical practice guidelines to help guide management of these injuries. The purpose of this paper is to review the biomechanical and clinical retrospective and prospective data pertinent to the indications for operative management of distal radius fractures. Conflicting data exists as to the optimal management of these injuries, especially in patients over the age of 55. Although there is some evidence to support operative fixation of distal radius fractures, better longterm, prospective, randomized studies with validated patient outcome measures are needed to definitively establish the optimal method of treatment for these injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30835544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bryan C Ding, Justin M Weatherall, Kenneth J Mroczek, Steven C Sheskier
Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are among the most common fractures of the foot. History, physical examination, and subsequent radiographic work-up can help with the diagnosis of such a fracture. Many fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal can have an associated prodrome, thereby establishing a level of chronicity to the problem. Identification of the location of the fracture plane within the proximal fifth metatarsal can have prognostic implications in regards to fracture union rate and guide treatment options, due to the particular vascular anatomy of the region. Additional findings on physical exam, such as heel varus, can also impact prognosis and treatment options. Treatments can range from nonoperative to operative modalities, and time to weightbearing can vary. Within the realm of operative treatment, identification of certain parameters can aid in successful reduction and fixation of the fracture and thus impact healing. Careful consideration of the patient's particular constellation of social and professional needs, clinical and radiographic parameters, and acceptance of different options can help guide treatment recommendations in the individual patient.
{"title":"Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: keeping up with the Joneses.","authors":"Bryan C Ding, Justin M Weatherall, Kenneth J Mroczek, Steven C Sheskier","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are among the most common fractures of the foot. History, physical examination, and subsequent radiographic work-up can help with the diagnosis of such a fracture. Many fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal can have an associated prodrome, thereby establishing a level of chronicity to the problem. Identification of the location of the fracture plane within the proximal fifth metatarsal can have prognostic implications in regards to fracture union rate and guide treatment options, due to the particular vascular anatomy of the region. Additional findings on physical exam, such as heel varus, can also impact prognosis and treatment options. Treatments can range from nonoperative to operative modalities, and time to weightbearing can vary. Within the realm of operative treatment, identification of certain parameters can aid in successful reduction and fixation of the fracture and thus impact healing. Careful consideration of the patient's particular constellation of social and professional needs, clinical and radiographic parameters, and acceptance of different options can help guide treatment recommendations in the individual patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 1","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30835546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The efficacy of initial and long-term prednisone < 5 mg/ day in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by one academic rheumatologist over 25 years from 1980 to 2004 is summarized. Patient responses were assessed using a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), completed by all patients at all visits in the infrastructure of care. A database was maintained of all visits, which included medications and scores for physical function, pain, patient global estimate of status, and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), an index of these 3 measures. Prednisone doses were higher in patients with more severe MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores, as expected, although formal criteria were not used to determine the initial dose. Similar improvements were seen in clinical status over 12 months in patients treated with < 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/day prednisone and maintained for > 8 years. Adverse effects were primarily bruising and skin-thinning; levels of hypertension, diabetes, and cataracts were not higher than expected, including in 148 patients monitored over > 4 years, 75 over > 8 years. Prednisone at initial and long-term doses of < 5 mg/day appears acceptable and effective for many patients with RA at this time, although further clinical trials and long-term observational studies are needed to optimize treatment of patients with RA with low-dose prednisone. The data also illustrate that MDHAQ scores in usual clinical care can be used to document results of therapy over long periods with no extra work for the physician.
{"title":"Effective initial and long-term prednisone in doses of less than 5 mg/day to treat rheumatoid arthritis--documentation using a patient self-report Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ).","authors":"Theodore Pincus, Isabel Castrejón","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of initial and long-term prednisone < 5 mg/ day in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by one academic rheumatologist over 25 years from 1980 to 2004 is summarized. Patient responses were assessed using a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), completed by all patients at all visits in the infrastructure of care. A database was maintained of all visits, which included medications and scores for physical function, pain, patient global estimate of status, and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), an index of these 3 measures. Prednisone doses were higher in patients with more severe MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores, as expected, although formal criteria were not used to determine the initial dose. Similar improvements were seen in clinical status over 12 months in patients treated with < 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/day prednisone and maintained for > 8 years. Adverse effects were primarily bruising and skin-thinning; levels of hypertension, diabetes, and cataracts were not higher than expected, including in 148 patients monitored over > 4 years, 75 over > 8 years. Prednisone at initial and long-term doses of < 5 mg/day appears acceptable and effective for many patients with RA at this time, although further clinical trials and long-term observational studies are needed to optimize treatment of patients with RA with low-dose prednisone. The data also illustrate that MDHAQ scores in usual clinical care can be used to document results of therapy over long periods with no extra work for the physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 Suppl 1 ","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31139548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Some of this past year's key papers or abstracts on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) assessment and treatment are reviewed in this paper. Treatment begins with identification of the PsA patient. Several screening questionnaires have been developed to be used in dermatology and primary care settings to identify which patients with psoriasis have developed PsA as opposed to other common musculoskeletal problems, such as osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia, thus increasing case-finding and targeting referral. PsA can present in a heterogeneous manner, involving arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, spondylitis, and skin and nail disease. Measures of these individual domains have been developed for use in clinical trials and improved PsA-specific composite measures of these domains are being evaluated as well. A quantitative therapy target, Minimal Disease Activity criteria, has been developed by the GRAPPA group. Treatment recommendations have been published by EULAR and GRAPPA. Obesity is a risk factor for the development of PsA and may adversely influence treatment outcomes. Although pharmacologic treatment often begins with methotrexate, a recent study does not provide clear evidence of its effectiveness. Anti-TNF therapies remain the gold standard of effectiveness. New therapeutic options are potentially emerging including ustekinumab, abatacept, several IL-17 inhibitors, apremilast, JAK inhibitors, and possibly IL-6 inhibitors.
{"title":"Update on treatment of psoriatic arthritis.","authors":"Philip Mease","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some of this past year's key papers or abstracts on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) assessment and treatment are reviewed in this paper. Treatment begins with identification of the PsA patient. Several screening questionnaires have been developed to be used in dermatology and primary care settings to identify which patients with psoriasis have developed PsA as opposed to other common musculoskeletal problems, such as osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia, thus increasing case-finding and targeting referral. PsA can present in a heterogeneous manner, involving arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, spondylitis, and skin and nail disease. Measures of these individual domains have been developed for use in clinical trials and improved PsA-specific composite measures of these domains are being evaluated as well. A quantitative therapy target, Minimal Disease Activity criteria, has been developed by the GRAPPA group. Treatment recommendations have been published by EULAR and GRAPPA. Obesity is a risk factor for the development of PsA and may adversely influence treatment outcomes. Although pharmacologic treatment often begins with methotrexate, a recent study does not provide clear evidence of its effectiveness. Anti-TNF therapies remain the gold standard of effectiveness. New therapeutic options are potentially emerging including ustekinumab, abatacept, several IL-17 inhibitors, apremilast, JAK inhibitors, and possibly IL-6 inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":" ","pages":"167-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31135901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The past year has been a dynamic one for clinicians and researchers with an interest in osteoporosis. This update will focus on the issue of the relationship between bisphosphonate treatment and atypical femoral fractures, highlight the advances in imaging techniques that are increasingly being studied as adjuncts to bone density testing, and explore recent evidence that suggests that osteoporosis medications may be linked to an increase in life expectancy. Since the first case reports describing unusual femur fractures in long term users of bisphosphonates began to appear, there has been great interest in identifying why and whether this class of drug can cause these atypical fractures. There have been a significant number of large studies that seem to suggest that these fractures do occur with an increased frequency among subjects who have used bisphosphonates over an extended period of time, but that these events are relatively rare. The occurrence of these fractures have helped to fashion new treatment regimens with periods of "drug holidays" often recommended to people with lower short-term and intermediate-term fracture risk. It is important to remind the reader that bisphosphonates prevent many typical hip and vertebral compression fractures, particularly in the higher risk elderly patient and that a rational balance be struck so that those in need of continued osteoporosis treatment receive it. Advances in imaging, such as high resolution MRI and peripheral micro CT scanners, are allowing investigators to non-invasively assess bone microarchitecture and bone stiffness of individuals as a means of trying to more accurately define those subjects who might be at increased risk of fracture and who might benefit from bone strengthening medication. Finally, this update will briefly review the emerging data that suggests that anti-resorptive medication may extend life expectancy beyond that which can be expected solely by reducing the incidence of future fractures.
{"title":"Osteoporosis: an update.","authors":"Stephen Honig, Gregory Chang","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The past year has been a dynamic one for clinicians and researchers with an interest in osteoporosis. This update will focus on the issue of the relationship between bisphosphonate treatment and atypical femoral fractures, highlight the advances in imaging techniques that are increasingly being studied as adjuncts to bone density testing, and explore recent evidence that suggests that osteoporosis medications may be linked to an increase in life expectancy. Since the first case reports describing unusual femur fractures in long term users of bisphosphonates began to appear, there has been great interest in identifying why and whether this class of drug can cause these atypical fractures. There have been a significant number of large studies that seem to suggest that these fractures do occur with an increased frequency among subjects who have used bisphosphonates over an extended period of time, but that these events are relatively rare. The occurrence of these fractures have helped to fashion new treatment regimens with periods of \"drug holidays\" often recommended to people with lower short-term and intermediate-term fracture risk. It is important to remind the reader that bisphosphonates prevent many typical hip and vertebral compression fractures, particularly in the higher risk elderly patient and that a rational balance be struck so that those in need of continued osteoporosis treatment receive it. Advances in imaging, such as high resolution MRI and peripheral micro CT scanners, are allowing investigators to non-invasively assess bone microarchitecture and bone stiffness of individuals as a means of trying to more accurately define those subjects who might be at increased risk of fracture and who might benefit from bone strengthening medication. Finally, this update will briefly review the emerging data that suggests that anti-resorptive medication may extend life expectancy beyond that which can be expected solely by reducing the incidence of future fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":" ","pages":"140-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31138700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Erhard Haus, Linda Sackett-Lundeen, Michael H Smolensky
Biological processes and functions at all hierarchical levels are organized in time as biological rhythms of discrete periods. Circadian (24-hour) rhythms, which are of direct importance to clinical medicine, are orchestrated by a set of clock genes of the master brain clock situated in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus plus numerous subservient peripheral cellular clocks of all tissues and organs. Circadian rhythms are kept in step with the surrounding physical and social milieu by periodic external time cues, the most important one being the 24-hour environmental light-dark cycle. The circadian time structure gives rise to predictable-in-time day-night patterns in morbid and mortal events plus symptom occurrence and severity of common chronic conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The circadian pattern of various cytokines and hormones in RA disease activity suggests a new treatment paradigm (i.e., chronotherapy-timing medications to 24-hour rhythms in disease pathophysiology) to improve desired outcomes. Since the 1950s, RA chronotherapy in the United States and Europe has involved several nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), certain disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and various synthetic corticosteroid medications.
{"title":"Rheumatoid arthritis: circadian rhythms in disease activity, signs and symptoms, and rationale for chronotherapy with corticosteroids and other medications.","authors":"Erhard Haus, Linda Sackett-Lundeen, Michael H Smolensky","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological processes and functions at all hierarchical levels are organized in time as biological rhythms of discrete periods. Circadian (24-hour) rhythms, which are of direct importance to clinical medicine, are orchestrated by a set of clock genes of the master brain clock situated in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus plus numerous subservient peripheral cellular clocks of all tissues and organs. Circadian rhythms are kept in step with the surrounding physical and social milieu by periodic external time cues, the most important one being the 24-hour environmental light-dark cycle. The circadian time structure gives rise to predictable-in-time day-night patterns in morbid and mortal events plus symptom occurrence and severity of common chronic conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The circadian pattern of various cytokines and hormones in RA disease activity suggests a new treatment paradigm (i.e., chronotherapy-timing medications to 24-hour rhythms in disease pathophysiology) to improve desired outcomes. Since the 1950s, RA chronotherapy in the United States and Europe has involved several nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), certain disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and various synthetic corticosteroid medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 Suppl 1 ","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31139546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The current approach to treatment of RA includes early and aggressive treatment with routine monitoring of outcomes to give patients the best chance of decreasing disease activity as much as possible, with low disease activity and remission being a realistic goal for many patients. In this quest, DMARDs, especially MTX, are the anchor treatment, and low dose prednisone should also be considered in combination with MTX as the best initial choice for RA treatment. Current data suggest that corticosteroids are disease modifying agents that enhance the effects of DMARDs with no real impact on adverse events. We are much better positioned now then in earlier times to provide a good outcome for our patients, and every available tool needs to be considered and utilized for this purpose.
{"title":"Corticosteroids as disease modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.","authors":"Yusuf Yazici","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current approach to treatment of RA includes early and aggressive treatment with routine monitoring of outcomes to give patients the best chance of decreasing disease activity as much as possible, with low disease activity and remission being a realistic goal for many patients. In this quest, DMARDs, especially MTX, are the anchor treatment, and low dose prednisone should also be considered in combination with MTX as the best initial choice for RA treatment. Current data suggest that corticosteroids are disease modifying agents that enhance the effects of DMARDs with no real impact on adverse events. We are much better positioned now then in earlier times to provide a good outcome for our patients, and every available tool needs to be considered and utilized for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 Suppl 1 ","pages":"11-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31139547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
B cells were originally considered key mediators in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The presence of these cells in many RA synovial tissues and the discovery of rheumatoid factor had put B cells originally at the center of disease pathogenesis. That enthusiasm vanished shortly thereafter only to resurface in the last 15 years with the appearance of highly specific anti-cyclic citullinated protein antibodies. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody that depletes mature B cells, was approved for the treatment of RA in 2006. Since then, B cell depletion strategies have proven efficacy for advanced disease, particularly in those patients that do not respond to DMARDs or TNFα inhibitors.
B 细胞最初被认为是类风湿性关节炎(RA)发病机制的关键介质。B细胞存在于许多类风湿关节炎滑膜组织中,类风湿因子的发现使B细胞成为疾病发病机制的核心。但这种热情很快就消失了,直到最近15年,随着高特异性抗环瓜氨酸蛋白抗体的出现,这种热情才重新出现。利妥昔单抗是一种能消耗成熟B细胞的抗CD20抗体,2006年被批准用于治疗RA。从那时起,B细胞清除策略已被证明对晚期疾病有疗效,尤其是对DMARDs或TNFα抑制剂无效的患者。
{"title":"B-cell therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Jose U Scher","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>B cells were originally considered key mediators in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The presence of these cells in many RA synovial tissues and the discovery of rheumatoid factor had put B cells originally at the center of disease pathogenesis. That enthusiasm vanished shortly thereafter only to resurface in the last 15 years with the appearance of highly specific anti-cyclic citullinated protein antibodies. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody that depletes mature B cells, was approved for the treatment of RA in 2006. Since then, B cell depletion strategies have proven efficacy for advanced disease, particularly in those patients that do not respond to DMARDs or TNFα inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":"70 3","pages":"200-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9754688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}