Community health equity research & policy最新文献

Community Health Worker (CHW) home visits are central to primary care provision in São Paulo, Brazil. Yet CHWs receive little training prior to conducting these visits. In the neighborhood where I conducted ethnographic fieldwork, nearly half of patients were immigrants to Brazil, adding a layer of sociocultural and linguistic difference. I thus investigated how interactions between CHWs and patients unfolded and were shaped by cultural processes. Analyzing fieldnotes and interview data, I found that CHWs cherished relationships with older adult Portuguese-speaking patients, while expressing exasperation and even disgust with more recent immigrants and patients living with stigmatized health conditions. The cultural processes of recognition and stigma shaped CHWs' perceptions of and interactions with patients. I ground these analyses in the history of state-sponsored discourse linking immigrants with poor hygiene, concluding that home visits deserve greater scrutiny as a public health tool that may increase access to care at the expense of health equity.

A qualitative, community-engaged assessment was conducted to identify needs and priorities for infant obesity prevention programs among mothers participating in home visiting programs. Thirty-two stakeholders (i.e., community partners, mothers, home visitors) affiliated with a home visiting program serving low-income families during the prenatal to age three period participated in group level assessment sessions or individual qualitative interviews. Results indicated families face many challenges to obesity prevention particularly in terms of healthy eating. An obesity prevention program can address these challenges by offering realistic feeding options and non-judgmental peer support, improving access to resources, and tailoring program content to individual family needs and preferences. Informational needs, family factors in healthy eating outcomes, and the importance of access and awareness of programs were also noted. To ensure the cultural- and contextual-relevance of infant obesity prevention programs for underserved populations, needs and preferences among community stakeholders and the focal population should be used as a roadmap for intervention development.

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and STI treatment remain a challenge in public health. There is little understanding of related factors influencing health seeking behaviour and delay of care among clinic attendees in Jamaica.

Aim: To determine socio-demographic profile of clinic attendees with STI and identify factors associated with delay in seeking care for STI-related symptoms.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was done. 201 adult patients presenting with STI symptoms from four health centres in Kingston and St Andrew were selected. A 24-item interviewer-assisted questionnaire was used to obtain data on socio-demographic characteristics, patients' symptoms and duration, previous STIs, knowledge of complications and seriousness of STIs, and factors influencing decision to seek medical care.

Results: Almost 75% delayed seeking care for STIs. Recurrent STIs was identified in 41% of patients. 'Could not find time' was the most commonly reported reason for delay in seeking care (36%). Females were 3.4 times more likely to delay seeking care for STI symptoms than males (OR 3.42, 95% CI: 1.73-6.73). Those with primary level education and below were 5 times more likely to delay seeking care for STI symptoms than those with at least secondary level education (OR 5.05, 95% CI: 1.09-23.46). Participants viewed staff as confidential (68%) and 65% thought health-care workers spent adequate time during consultations.

Conclusion: Lower education level and the female gender are associated with delay in seeking care for STI-related symptoms. These factors should be considered when developing interventions to reduce delay in care for STI-related symptoms.

Resilience, the individual trait of being able to persist and cope with, often recurrent, negative experiences, has experienced an explosion in recent years as a topic of study. In this commentary, we critique this surge and problematize the co-occurring development of the "resilience as treatment" paradigm. We show that resilience is an expectation foisted primarily on historically and contemporarily oppressed and excluded populations often in response to systemic and structural forms of discrimination. We argue that this represents a fundamental mismatch of intervention and problem; offering an individual-level solution to a structural toxin. In doing so, we re-contextualize resilience as an adverse event, more analogous to scar tissue than a reliable treatment paradigm. Our essay concludes with offering alternatives to resilience that originate with the holistic trauma and liberation health frameworks. These paradigms are united in that, in contrast to resilience, they emphasize healing from structural violence, rather than adapting to it.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic shed light on stark racial and ethnic inequities in access to care and accurate health information in the U.S. When COVID-19 vaccines became available, communities of color faced multiple barriers that contributed to low vaccine rates. To address this gap, the Equity-First Vaccination Initiative supported community organizations in five demonstration cities to plan and implement hyper-local strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccine access and uptake among communities of color.Purpose: To draw learnings from the experiences of the participating organizations, we applied a framework that integrated implementation science and health equity principles.Design and sample: In this commentary, we describe how we used this framework to guide qualitative interviews with community organizations, focusing on insights across five implementation elements (reach, design, implementation, adaptation, implementation outcomes).Conclusions: Learnings from this evaluation may help guide future implementation of similarly complex initiatives involving multiple organizations and sites to advance health equity during a public health crisis.

The significance of mental health inequities globally is illustrated by higher rates of anxiety and depression amongst racial and ethnic minority populations as well as individuals of lower socioeconomic status. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these pre-existing mental health inequities. With rising mental health concerns, arts engagement offers an accessible, equitable opportunity to combat mental health inequities and impact upstream determinants of health. As the field of public health continues to shift its focus toward social ecological strategies, the social ecological model of health offers an approach that prioritizes social and structural determinants of health. To capture the impacts of arts engagement, this paper creates an applied social ecological model of health while aiming to advocate that engaging in the arts is a protective and rehabilitative behavior for mental health.

Background: Faith-based interventions are promising for promoting healthy behaviors among adults, but their ripple effects on participants' children are unknown. This study is one of the first to assess the effects of a faith-based multilevel obesity intervention on adult participants' children.

Methods: We analyzed quantitative data from a cluster randomized controlled trial with two African American and two Latino churches in South Los Angeles, California, which invited adult participants to enroll one child (5-17 years) in a sub-study. At baseline and 6-7 months follow-up, parents completed a child health survey, which included the family nutrition and physical activity screening tool, and child height and weight were measured (n = 50).

Results: Results from linear regression models showed children of intervention participants, compared to control, had significantly better dietary patterns at follow-up.

Conclusions: Findings suggest the health benefits of a faith-based multilevel obesity intervention for adults can extend to children and may help address obesity disparities.

Background: Public health midwives (PHMs) play a frontline role in the Sri Lankan public healthcare system, ensuring the health of children and women at the community level. However, cultural differences in diverse social contexts necessitate PHMs for customised interventions to ensure optimum child and maternal health, particularly in most vulnerable communities.Purpose: The objective of the present study is to explore how PHMs have adapted their roles as community change agents to facilitate community mobilisation before implementing healthcare interventions for children and mothers in the estate sector (a marginalised and vulnerable community) of Sri Lanka.Research Design and methods: Using an exploratory qualitative research design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with 16 participants. The thematic analysis revealed two main themes that describe how PHMs engage in community mobilisation in addition to their designated role as healthcare officials in the estate sector of Sri Lanka.Results: The first theme highlights PHMs' involvement in community mobilisation through context-relevant advocacy for effective service implementation. The second theme illustrates how PHMs' role has been reshaped as advocates to intervene in making the family a supportive institution for child and maternal health. PHMs who work in the estate sector in the country are morally committed to engaging in community mobilisation and advocacy. However, this obligation can be neglected due to the lack of formal arrangements and training in sociocultural determinants of health and working with vulnerable communities.Conclusions: The role of a PHM in the estate sector differs significantly from that in the urban and rural sectors, given the significance of their interventions in family health. Also, community mobilisation is a prerequisite for implementing health policies for child and maternal health in vulnerable communities. Both community-level and family-level advocacy interventions and mobilisation efforts are equally important to establishing a supportive environment, without which any child and maternal healthcare interventions are difficult to implement.

Objective: Describe the participatory research procedures of developing Kick Vaping, a vaping cessation text messaging intervention for Latino young adults, available in English and Spanish.

Methods: Using community-based recruitment strategies, we convened a Community Advisory Board (CAB) of eight Latino young adults (ages 18-25) with different vaping experiences (never users, ex-users, and current users of e-cigarettes). Members held a series of working meetings to adapt Decídetexto, a smoking cessation text messaging intervention, for vaping cessation. Members provided iterative feedback on the text messages until reaching a consensus on content. Messages were translated from English to Spanish following a committee approach. Readability assessments were used to evaluate the legibility of the text messages.

Results: At baseline, members' mean age was 22.6 years old (SD 3.1), 75% were female, and 50% used both English and Spanish equally. Three members (37.5%) were ex-users and one member (12.5%) was a current user of e-cigarettes. 18 meetings provided sufficient opportunities for iterative feedback on the text messages for developing the intervention. The Kick Vaping intervention consists of 208 text messages. Readability scores of the text messages in English were equivalent to fourth and fifth grade, and in Spanish were equivalent to easy and somewhat easy.

Conclusion: It is feasible and practical to build participatory research among Latino young adults focused on vaping cessation. Members of the CAB added innovation and creativity to the development of the vaping cessation text messaging intervention. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of the intervention on vaping cessation.

Botswana has an adult HIV prevalence of 20.8% and annual incidence of 0.2%. We aimed to evaluate current practices and advance recommendations for treatment partners (informal adherence supporters) for people with HIV in Botswana. In January-February 2020, we conducted seven focus groups with 36 healthcare providers at seven HIV clinics in Gaborone, Botswana. Providers perceived treatment partners to be critical for quality patient care. They shared that in the new era of universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation immediately after diagnosis ("test-and-treat"), providers no longer require patients to select treatment partners at ART initiation. Providers suggested a renewed emphasis on treatment partners. They believed that standard guidance for providers around treatment partner selection would ensure that providers cover similar topics across patients and endorsed implementation of workshops to educate treatment partners on how to support patients. However, streamlined ART initiation policies require innovative strategies, including eHealth interventions, to engage treatment partners.