Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)最新文献

Although emergency department (ED) visits for patients with mental illness are frequent, medical evaluation (i.e., "medical screening") of patients presenting with psychiatric complaints is inconsistent. This may largely be related to differing goals for medical screening, which often vary according to specialty. Although emergency physicians typically focus on stabilization of life-threatening diseases, psychiatrists tend to believe that care in the ED is more comprehensive, which often places the two fields at odds. The authors discuss the concept of medical screening, review the literature on this topic, and offer a clinically oriented update to the 2017 American Association for Emergency Psychiatry consensus guidelines on medical evaluation of the adult psychiatric patient in the ED.

Emergency psychiatry stands at the fulcrum between the general principles of autonomy and liberty balanced against illnesses that both subvert autonomy and amplify risks for violence and suicide. Although all specialties of medicine must operate in adherence with the law, emergency psychiatry is particularly constrained and guided by state and federal laws. Routine matters of emergency psychiatric care-including involuntary assessment, admission and treatment, management of agitation, medical stabilization and transfer, confidentiality, voluntary and involuntary commitment, and duties to third parties-all occur within carefully delimited legal boundaries, rules, and processes. This article provides a basic overview of critical legal principles relevant to the practice of emergency psychiatry.

Empirically validated treatments for borderline personality disorder rely on fostering self-awareness of one's internal experience for treatment success, yet these treatments do not include objective tools to assess self-awareness. Integrating biofeedback into empirically supported treatments provides a way to objectively measure physiological correlates of emotional states, thereby enhancing accurate self-assessment. By using biofeedback, individuals with borderline personality disorder may gain skills to increase self-awareness, improve emotion regulation, and enhance behavioral control. The authors propose that biofeedback can be used to objectively measure fluctuating emotional intensity, thereby facilitating structured self-assessment of emotions and enabling more effective use of interventions for emotion regulation; can be delivered by trained mental health professionals; and may even be considered as a stand-alone intervention replacing alternative, more costly, treatments.

Agitated patients can be dangerous to themselves and others. In fact, severe medical complications and death can occur with severe agitation. Because of this, agitation is considered a medical and psychiatric emergency. Regardless of the treatment setting, identifying the agitated patient early is a necessary skill. The authors review relevant literature regarding the identification and management of agitation and summarize current recommendations for adults, as well as children and adolescents.

Suicide is a serious public health issue and is a leading cause of death worldwide. Suicidal ideation is a common presentation in emergency department (ED) settings, with many nuanced complications. Therefore, understanding screening, assessment, and mitigation is paramount to successful encounters with individuals presenting to emergency settings in psychiatric crises. Screening helps to identify the few people at risk within a large group. Assessment seeks to decide whether a specific individual is at significant risk. Mitigation aims to reduce the risk of suicide or of a serious attempt for a person at risk. These aims cannot be achieved with perfect reliability, but some approaches are more effective than others. Suicide screening specifics are important, even to individual practitioners, because a positive screen triggers assessment. Most practitioners understand assessment well: beginning with early psychiatric training, they are taught signs and symptoms suggesting that a patient might be at risk of suicide. Mitigating suicide risk is increasingly important to reduce the misery of ED boarding for patients awaiting psychiatric admission. For many patients, hospital admission is unnecessary if support, monitoring, and contingency plans are workable. For any individual patient, there may be a complicated mix of findings, risks, and interventions. Evidence-based screening and assessment tools are inadequate for the possible complexities, making care of individual patients dependent on good clinical assessment. The authors review the available evidence and offer experienced recommendations for challenges not yet thoroughly researched.

Awareness of potential aggression and violence is crucial when treating patients experiencing mental health crises in psychiatric emergency and inpatient settings. To provide a practical overview for health care workers in acute care psychiatry, the authors summarize relevant literature and clinical considerations on this important topic. Clinical contexts of violence in these settings, possible impact on patients and staff, and approaches to mitigating risk are reviewed. Considerations for early identification of at-risk patients and situations, and nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions, are highlighted. The authors conclude with key points and future scholarly and practical directions that may further assist those entrusted with providing psychiatric care in these situations. Although working in these often high-paced, high-pressured settings can be challenging, effective violence-management strategies and tools can help staff optimize the focus on patient care while maintaining safety, their own well-being, and overall workplace satisfaction.

The treatment of severe mental illness has undergone a paradigm shift over the last fifty years, away from a primary emphasis on hospital-based care and toward community-based care. Some of the forces driving this deinstitutionalization have been scientific and patient-centered, such as better differentiation between acute and subacute risk, innovations in outpatient and crisis care (assertive community treatment programs, dialectical behavioral therapy, treatment-oriented psychiatric emergency services), gradually improving psychopharmacology, and an increased appreciation of the negative effect of coercive hospitalization, except when risk is very high. On the other hand, some of the forces have been less focused on patient needs: budget-driven cuts in public hospital beds divorced from population-based need; managed care's profit-driven impact on private psychiatric hospitals and outpatient services; and purported patient-centered approaches promoting non-hospital care that may under-recognize that some extremely ill patients need years of painstaking effort to make a community transition. The result has been a reconfiguration of the country's mental health system that, at times, leaves large numbers of people without adequate mental health and substance abuse services. Often their only option is to seek care in medical emergency department's (ED's) that are not designed for their needs. Increasingly, many of those individuals end up waiting in ED's for appropriate care and disposition for hours or days. This overflow phenomenon has become so prevalent in ED's that it has been given a name: "boarding". This practice is almost certainly detrimental to patients and staff, and it has spawned efforts on multiple fronts to understand and resolve it. When considering solutions, both ED-focused and system-wide considerations must be explored. This resource document provides an overview and recommendations regarding this complex topic. Reprinted with permission from American Psychiatric Association. Copyright © 2019.

Introduction: Agitation in children and adolescents in the emergency department (ED) can be dangerous and distressing for patients, family and staff. We present consensus guidelines for management of agitation among pediatric patients in the ED, including non-pharmacologic methods and the use of immediate and as-needed medications.

Methods: Using the Delphi method of consensus, a workgroup comprised of 17 experts in emergency child and adolescent psychiatry and psychopharmacology from the the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Emergency Child Psychiatry Committee sought to create consensus guidelines for the management of acute agitation in children and adolescents in the ED.

Results: Consensus found that there should be a multimodal approach to managing agitation in the ED, and that etiology of agitation should drive choice of treatment. We describe general and specific recommendations for medication use.

Conclusion: These guidelines describing child and adolescent psychiatry expert consensus for the management of agitation in the ED may be of use to pediatricians and emergency physicians who are without immediate access to psychiatry consultation.Reprinted from West J Emerg Med 2019; 20:409-418, with permission from the authors. Copyright © 2019.