Foot & ankle specialist最新文献

Background: Lateral ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury. Ankle braces are frequently used to prevent ankle injuries.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the anterior translation of the talocrural joint of 2 ankle braces relative to a control.

Methods: Ankle mobility was assessed with the Mobil-Aider arthrometer in 3 conditions: TayCo ankle brace, Aircast ankle brace, and control. Three measures were recorded for each condition.

Results: Thirty participants (9 male and 21 female patients) participated. Friedman's analysis of variance found significant between-group differences for the trial with the largest translation. Wilcoxon signed-ranks post hoc testing found significant between-group differences between the control and TayCo (P < .001) and the control and Aircast conditions (P < .001). Post hoc power analysis revealed a Kendall's W of 0.804.

Clinical application: The TayCo brace is unique in that it is worn on the outside of the athletic shoe, whereas the Aircast is composed of lateral constraints worn inside the shoe. Both braces provided significant constraint over anterior talus translation when compared to control. The TayCo brace (51%-52% of control) was also significantly better than the Aircast (58%-59% of control) with less anterior translation permitted. This may be instrumental in preventing ankle injuries.

Level of evidence: 2b.

Background: Lateral ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury across a variety of activities. Researchers have sought to identify a method to objectively assess joint laxity with a device that is simple to use and affordable.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the use of an ankle arthrometer on individuals with ankle sprains.

Methods: The participant was evaluated by the physician and the degree of ankle sprain was identified. In the prone position, the arthrometer was used to perform an anterior drawer test (uninjured before injured, 3 measures each). Both clinicians were blinded to the data of the other.

Results: There were 30 participants, 10 in each group (uninjured, grade 1 sprain, grade 2 sprain). Mann-Whitney U testing found significant differences between the control and grade I ankle sprain groups (P < .001), the control and grade II ankle sprain groups (P < .001), and the grade I and grade II ankle sprain groups (P = .004). There was ±0.31-mm difference in anterior translation between healthy ankles, whereas there was 1.11- and 2.16-mm difference between ankles in grade 1 and grade 2 sprains, respectively.

Clinical application: Despite the manual anterior drawer test being convenient, the subjectivity makes it unreliable. This study is consistent with prior literature about the difference in translation (millimeters) between the uninjured and injured ankles corresponding to the magnitude of ankle laxity. This study also contributes to the evolving evidence to support the relationship of a ratio of measures (injured/uninjured) as an objective measure of laxity. These comparisons to the individual's healthy ankle mitigate the variability of the normative values. The use of an arthrometer to assess ankle joint laxity enhances the objectivity of patient assessment throughout the recovery process.

Levels of evidence: Level III.

Background: While osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) offers favorable results in most patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT), some patients continue to experience persistent pain following the procedure. Information regarding the etiology of this pain and outcomes of revision surgery are limited. This study aimed to report results of revision surgery with realignment procedures in patients with failed OAT who demonstrated concomitant malalignment at the distal tibia or hindfoot.

Methods: Eight patients (8 ankles), who had been experiencing persistent pain for more than 1 year following OAT, underwent realignment procedures during revision surgery. All patients underwent primary OAT for the treatment of medial OLTs. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the main location of deformity: the supramalleolar realignment group (SRG, 5 ankles) and the hindfoot realignment group (HRG, 3 ankles). No direct procedure was performed on the osteochondral lesion at the time of revision surgery. Ankle and hindfoot alignment were evaluated using 6 parameters in weightbearing radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) was used to assess for medial gutter narrowing, spur formation, and cyst volume around transplanted osteochondral plug preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale.

Results: All patients had medial gutter narrowing or spur formation, which are early signs of ankle arthritis. The SRG had varus distal tibial alignment with a median medial distal tibial angle of 85.7 degrees (interquartile range [IQR], 3.2). The HRG had valgus hindfoot alignment and a lower medial longitudinal arch with a median hindfoot moment arm of 8.4 mm (IQR, 6.1) and a median Meary's angle of 11.8 degrees (IQR, 1.4). Spontaneous restoration of the osteochondral lesion was observed after realignment surgery, with cyst volume decreasing from 0.2592 to 0.0873 cm³ (P < .05). Clinical scores improved in all patients.

Conclusion: The current study demonstrates the effectiveness of realignment surgery in a selected patient group who experienced persistent pain and showed radiographic evidence of malalignment after primary OAT. Our study provides evidence supporting the use of realignment procedures in these cases, with results indicating improved patient-reported outcomes and spontaneous restoration of osteochondral lesions.

Levels of evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Introduction: Lateral ankle sprains are the most common type of injury to the ankle and can lead to ankle instability. There are many described techniques for the surgical treatment of lateral ankle instability. The purpose of this study is to quantify the variation in surgeon technique for lateral ankle instability treatment.

Methods: Surveys were sent to 62 orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons regarding surgical technique for the treatment of lateral ankle instability. Clinical agreement was defined as greater than 80% agreement to assess the cohesiveness of surgical methods as described by Marx et al. Results. Response rate was 49/62 (79%). There was clinical agreement for not using bone tunnels and not using metal anchors. All other factors lacked clinical agreement. A greater average number of throws and knots (4.2 for each, range 1-6 throws, range 2-12 knots) were used by surgeons that do not believe knots cause pain compared to an average of 3.9 (range, 1-6) throws and 4.0 (range, 2-15) knots by surgeons who do believe knots cause pain. The association that surgeon who believed knots do cause pain and thus used fewer knots and throws was not statistically significant (P > .05). The preferred material by surgeons in our study are as follows: nonabsorbable braided suture (26/49, 53%), suture tape (15/49, 31%), and fiber tape (4/49, 8%). Among surgeons who use absorbable suture (34/49, 69%), there was no significant difference (P > .05) between surgeons who believe knots cause pain (23/34, 68%) and those who do not (11/34, 32%).

Discussion and conclusion: Among this small sample of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons, there is wide variation in surgical technique for lateral ankle instability treatment and little agreement on the clinical standard of care. This disagreement highlights the need for comparative outcome studies in the treatment of ankle instability.

Level of evidence: Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Background: Assessing and understanding the control of the ankle during multidirectional jump landings in athletes with chronic ankle instability (CAI) would help health professionals develop interventions to reduce the risk of recurrent injuries. The aim of this study was to investigate the angle, angular velocity, and movements of the ankle joint, and the muscle activity of peroneus longus (PL), tibialis anterior (TA), and gastrocnemius (GAS) muscles during multidirectional landings in athletes with CAI.

Methods: Nineteen athletes with CAI (≤25 Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool-Thai Score) participated. A Vicon Nexus motion analysis system synchronously collected data with an AMTI force plate and surface electromyography (EMG) to capture kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity, respectively. Participants were asked to perform single-leg jump-landing tests in forward (0°), 30° diagonal, 60° diagonal, and lateral (90°) directions. Ankle joint kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of PL, TA, and GAS were analyzed. Repeated measure ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Friedman tests were used to analyze the main effects of the jump-landing direction.

Results: Athletes with CAI exhibited significant differences in ankle angles, angular velocities, ankle movements, and average muscle activity of GAS between directions. Greatest average EMG of GAS muscle was observed during landing in the lateral direction compared with the forward and 30° diagonal directions.

Conclusion: Lateral and diagonal direction movements showed the greatest risks associated with recurrent ankle sprains. Impairments of neuromuscular control in both pre-landing and landing phases were observed in athletes with CAI when considered alongside previously published data.

Level of evidence: Laboratory-based observational study.

Background: It is not known how peroneal tendon exploration influences results after modified Broström for lateral ankle instability. We propose peroneal exploration at the time of modified Broström will have similar outcomes as no peroneal exploration.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing modified Broström with and without peroneal exploration. Foot and Ankle Outcome scores and data regarding military retention were gathered and compared.

Results: Seventeen patients were identified in the modified Broström only cohort and 24 in the peroneal exploration cohort. Patients had mean follow-up of 5 years in both cohorts. The mean FAOS in the modified Broström only cohort was 68 and 72 in the cohort with peroneal exploration (P = .541). When each FAOS subcategory was analyzed, no difference was identified in any subcategory. Eight of 17 patients (47%) in the modified Broström only cohort remained active duty compared with 8 of 24 patients (33%) in the modified Broström with peroneal exploration cohort (P = .518). One patient medically discharged in the modified Broström only cohort versus 6 in peroneal exploration cohort (P = .109). Overall satisfaction with the procedure was 12 of 17 (71%) in the modified Broström only cohort and 19 of 24 (79%) in the peroneal exploration cohort (P = .529).

Conclusions: No significant difference was identified between patients undergoing modified Broström alone or modified Broström with peroneal exploration. There was no significant difference in return to duty, medical discharge or patient satisfaction.

Levels of evidence: Level III: retrospective case-control study with prospectively collected data.

Background: Suture buttons and metal screws have been used and compared in biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical outcome studies for syndesmotic injuries, with neither implant demonstrating clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of both implants.

Methods: Patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation at 2 separate academic centers from 2010 through 2017 were compared. Thirty-one patients treated with a suture button and 21 patients treated with screws were included. Patients in each group were matched by age, sex, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), patient satisfaction score, surgical failure, and reoperation rates were compared.

Results: Patients who underwent suture button fixation had significantly higher TAS scores than those who underwent screw fixation (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in FAAM ADL scores between cohorts (p = 0.08). Symptomatic hardware removal rates were similar (3.2% suture button cohort vs 9.0% in screw cohort). One patient (4.5%) underwent revision surgery secondary to syndesmotic malreduction after screw fixation, for a reoperation rate of 13.5%.

Conclusion: Patients with unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with suture button fixation had higher mean TAS scores compared to patients treated with screws. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and ADL scores in these cohorts were similar.Level of Evidence: Level 3 Retrospective Matched Case-Cohort.

Introduction: The literature largely addresses questions of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic accuracy. However, the magnitude of the clinical impact of syndesmosis injury is commonly described in intuitive yet qualitative terms. This systematic review aimed to quantify the impact of syndesmosis injury.

Methods: Published clinical outcomes data were used to compute an effect size reflecting the impact of syndesmosis injury. This was done within the clinical contexts of isolated syndesmosis injury and syndesmosis injury with concomitant ankle fracture. Clinical outcomes data included Olerud-Molander (OM) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale for pain, and days missed from sport competition. Parametric data were compared with Student t tests. Effect size was computed using Cohen's d.

Results: In ankle fracture patients, syndesmosis injury demonstrated a large effect size for OM (d = 0.96) and AOFAS (d = 0.83) scores. In athletic populations without concomitant ankle fracture, syndesmosis injury demonstrated a large effect size on days missed from competition (d = 2.32).

Discussion: These findings confirm the magnitude of the negative impact of syndesmosis injury in athletic populations with isolated injury and in ankle fracture patients. In ankle fracture patients, this large negative effect remains despite surgery. Thus, syndesmosis repair may not fully mitigate the impact of the injury.

Levels of evidence: Level III: Systematic review.

Background: Augmentation of soft tissue repairs has been helpful in protecting surgically repaired tissues as they heal. FlexBand (Artelon, Marietta, Georgia) is a synthetic, degradable, polycaprolactone-based polyurethane urea (PUUR) matrix that has been investigated and used for soft tissue repair in a variety of settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of a PUUR matrix in a large cohort of patients undergoing soft tissue repairs about the foot and ankle.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent surgery using FlexBand to augment a soft tissue repair was performed to evaluate for major and minor complications related to the PUUR matrix. Results. A total of 105 patients with an average >6 months follow-up were included. The most common procedures were spring ligament repair, Achilles tendon repair, and Brostrom. There were 12 complications. Four major complications occurred with only 1 requiring PUUR matrix removal. Patients with wound complications had a higher body mass index (BMI) and rate of smoking.

Conclusion: Complication rates involving PUUR matrix in soft tissue foot and ankle reconstruction procedures are low and comparable with historical complication rates. The PUUR matrix is safe for use in a variety of soft tissue procedures about the foot and ankle.Level of Evidence: Level 4, Retrospective case-series.

Background. Spiral fifth metatarsal fractures have been studied previously in professional dancers. However, little has been reported about outcomes of these injuries in the general population. The objective of this study was to examine patient demographics of those who sustain this injury and their functional outcomes, as stratified by treatment type. Methods. A total of 186 "nonprofessional dancer" patients with a fifth metatarsal fracture who were treated by one orthopaedic surgeon at our academic medical center were identified through chart review. All patients were allowed to weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT). Time to healing, persistence of pain, range of motion, and complications were recorded. Independent samples t tests, 1-way analysis of variance, and Fisher exact tests were used for analysis. Results. Thirty-seven of the 186 patients with fifth metatarsal fractures reviewed were identified as having a spiral fifth metatarsal fracture with appropriate follow-up. The cohort was 78.4% female with a mean age of 50.3 years. Twenty-two were initially treated in a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot, 14 in a postoperative shoe, and 1 continued in their own shoes. All patients were allowed to WBAT. All fractures healed by a mean of 3.1 months. By the end of the follow-up period, 67.6% of patients had full range of ankle motion, with 5.4% reporting feeling stiff, 27.0% reporting mild persistent pain, and 2.7% reporting significant persistent pain. Conclusion. Fifth metatarsal shaft ("Dancer's") fractures occur within the general population, not only among professional dancers. Without operative fixation and regardless of nonoperative treatment selected, these fractures heal reliably and do so without clinically relevant complication.Level of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.