首页 > 最新文献

Future healthcare journal最新文献

英文 中文
Artificial intelligence: The good, the bad and the beautifiable. A patient's view. 人工智能:好的、坏的和可美化的。病人的观点。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100167
Marlene Winfield
{"title":"Artificial intelligence: The good, the bad and the beautifiable. A patient's view.","authors":"Marlene Winfield","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100167","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100167","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence: friend or foe? 人工智能:是敌是友?
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100184
Andrew Duncombe
{"title":"Artificial intelligence: friend or foe?","authors":"Andrew Duncombe","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100184","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452833/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Democratising artificial intelligence in healthcare: community-driven approaches for ethical solutions. 医疗保健领域的人工智能民主化:社区驱动的伦理解决方案。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165
Ceilidh Welsh, Susana Román García, Gillian C Barnett, Raj Jena

The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of possibilities in healthcare, ranging from clinical task automation to disease detection. AI algorithms have the potential to analyse medical data, enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalise treatment plans and predict patient outcomes among other possibilities. With a surge in AI's popularity, its developments are outpacing policy and regulatory frameworks, leading to concerns about ethical considerations and collaborative development. Healthcare faces its own ethical challenges, including biased datasets, under-representation and inequitable access to resources, all contributing to mistrust in medical systems. To address these issues in the context of AI healthcare solutions and prevent perpetuating existing inequities, it is crucial to involve communities and stakeholders in the AI lifecycle. This article discusses four community-driven approaches for co-developing ethical AI healthcare solutions, including understanding and prioritising needs, defining a shared language, promoting mutual learning and co-creation, and democratising AI. These approaches emphasise bottom-up decision-making to reflect and centre impacted communities' needs and values. These collaborative approaches provide actionable considerations for creating equitable AI solutions in healthcare, fostering a more just and effective healthcare system that serves patient and community needs.

人工智能(AI)的快速发展和广泛应用为医疗保健领域带来了新的可能性,从临床任务自动化到疾病检测,无所不包。人工智能算法具有分析医疗数据、提高诊断准确性、个性化治疗方案和预测患者预后等潜力。随着人工智能的普及,其发展速度超过了政策和监管框架,引发了人们对伦理因素和合作发展的担忧。医疗保健面临着自身的伦理挑战,包括数据集存在偏见、代表性不足和资源获取不公平,所有这些都导致了人们对医疗系统的不信任。为了在人工智能医疗解决方案中解决这些问题,并防止现有的不平等现象长期存在,让社区和利益相关者参与人工智能生命周期至关重要。本文讨论了共同开发合乎伦理的人工智能医疗解决方案的四种社区驱动方法,包括了解需求并确定优先次序、定义共同语言、促进相互学习和共同创造以及实现人工智能民主化。这些方法强调自下而上的决策,以反映和集中受影响社区的需求和价值观。这些合作方法为在医疗保健领域创建公平的人工智能解决方案提供了可操作的考虑因素,促进建立一个更加公正、有效的医疗保健系统,以满足患者和社区的需求。
{"title":"Democratising artificial intelligence in healthcare: community-driven approaches for ethical solutions.","authors":"Ceilidh Welsh, Susana Román García, Gillian C Barnett, Raj Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of possibilities in healthcare, ranging from clinical task automation to disease detection. AI algorithms have the potential to analyse medical data, enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalise treatment plans and predict patient outcomes among other possibilities. With a surge in AI's popularity, its developments are outpacing policy and regulatory frameworks, leading to concerns about ethical considerations and collaborative development. Healthcare faces its own ethical challenges, including biased datasets, under-representation and inequitable access to resources, all contributing to mistrust in medical systems. To address these issues in the context of AI healthcare solutions and prevent perpetuating existing inequities, it is crucial to involve communities and stakeholders in the AI lifecycle. This article discusses four community-driven approaches for co-developing ethical AI healthcare solutions, including understanding and prioritising needs, defining a shared language, promoting mutual learning and co-creation, and democratising AI. These approaches emphasise bottom-up decision-making to reflect and centre impacted communities' needs and values. These collaborative approaches provide actionable considerations for creating equitable AI solutions in healthcare, fostering a more just and effective healthcare system that serves patient and community needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452836/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence in the NHS: Moving from ideation to implementation. 国家医疗服务系统中的人工智能:从构想到实施。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100183
Anmol Arora, Tom Lawton
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in the NHS: Moving from ideation to implementation.","authors":"Anmol Arora, Tom Lawton","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100183","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fairness in AI for healthcare. 医疗保健人工智能的公平性。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100177
Siân Carey, Allan Pang, Marc de Kamps

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that enables computers to simulate human intelligence and has the potential to improve healthcare in a multitude of ways. However, there are also possibilities that it may continue, or exacerbate, current disparities. We discuss the problem of bias in healthcare and AI, and go on to highlight some of the ongoing and future solutions that are being researched in the area.

人工智能(AI)是一种能让计算机模拟人类智能的技术,有可能以多种方式改善医疗保健。然而,人工智能也有可能延续或加剧当前的差距。我们将讨论医疗保健和人工智能中的偏见问题,并重点介绍该领域正在研究的一些解决方案和未来的解决方案。
{"title":"Fairness in AI for healthcare.","authors":"Siân Carey, Allan Pang, Marc de Kamps","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that enables computers to simulate human intelligence and has the potential to improve healthcare in a multitude of ways. However, there are also possibilities that it may continue, or exacerbate, current disparities. We discuss the problem of bias in healthcare and AI, and go on to highlight some of the ongoing and future solutions that are being researched in the area.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How should we train clinicians for artificial intelligence in healthcare? 我们应该如何培训临床医生在医疗保健领域使用人工智能?
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100162
Rohan Misra, Pearse A Keane, Henry David Jeffry Hogg
{"title":"How should we train clinicians for artificial intelligence in healthcare?","authors":"Rohan Misra, Pearse A Keane, Henry David Jeffry Hogg","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100162","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100162","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two paths for health AI governance: paternalism or democracy. 健康人工智能治理的两条道路:家长制还是民主制。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100180
Cori Crider

This article assesses the cyclical failures of NHS data modernisation programmes, and considers that they fail because they proceed from a faulty - excessively paternalistic - governance model. Bias in algorithmic delivery of healthcare, a demonstrated problem with many existing health applications, is another serious risk. To regain trust and move towards better use of data in the NHS, we should democratise the development of these systems, and de-risk operational systems from issues such as automation bias. As a comparison, the essay explores two approaches to trust and bias problems in other contexts: Taiwan's digital democracy, and American Airlines' struggles to overcome automation bias in their pilots.

本文对英国国家医疗服务系统数据现代化计划的周期性失败进行了评估,认为这些计划之所以失败,是因为其管理模式存在问题,即过度家长式管理。算法提供医疗服务的偏见是另一个严重的风险,许多现有的医疗应用程序都存在这个问题。为了重获信任并在国家医疗服务体系中更好地利用数据,我们应该使这些系统的开发民主化,并降低操作系统的风险,避免出现自动化偏差等问题。作为比较,本文探讨了其他背景下解决信任和偏见问题的两种方法:台湾的数字民主,以及美国航空公司在克服飞行员自动化偏见方面所做的努力。
{"title":"Two paths for health AI governance: paternalism or democracy.","authors":"Cori Crider","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100180","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article assesses the cyclical failures of NHS data modernisation programmes, and considers that they fail because they proceed from a faulty - excessively paternalistic - governance model. Bias in algorithmic delivery of healthcare, a demonstrated problem with many existing health applications, is another serious risk. To regain trust and move towards better use of data in the NHS, we should democratise the development of these systems, and de-risk operational systems from issues such as automation bias. As a comparison, the essay explores two approaches to trust and bias problems in other contexts: Taiwan's digital democracy, and American Airlines' struggles to overcome automation bias in their pilots.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Explaining decisions without explainability? Artificial intelligence and medicolegal accountability. 无法解释的决定?人工智能与医疗法律责任。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100171
Melissa D McCradden, Ian Stedman

Image, graphical abstract.

图像,图形摘要。
{"title":"Explaining decisions without explainability? Artificial intelligence and medicolegal accountability.","authors":"Melissa D McCradden, Ian Stedman","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100171","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Image, graphical abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452834/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving beyond the AI sales pitch - Empowering clinicians to ask the right questions about clinical AI. 超越人工智能推销--让临床医生能够提出有关临床人工智能的正确问题。
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100179
Ibrahim Habli, Mark Sujan, Tom Lawton

We challenge the dominant technology-centric narrative around clinical AI. To realise the true potential of the technology, clinicians must be empowered to take a whole-system perspective and assess the suitability of AI-supported tasks for their specific complex clinical setting. Key factors include the AI's capacity to augment human capabilities, evidence of clinical safety beyond general performance metrics and equitable clinical decision-making by the human-AI team. Proactively addressing these issues could pave the way for an accountable clinical buy-in and a trustworthy deployment of the technology.

我们质疑围绕临床人工智能的以技术为中心的主流说法。要实现该技术的真正潜力,临床医生必须有能力从整个系统的角度出发,评估人工智能支持的任务是否适合其特定的复杂临床环境。关键因素包括人工智能增强人类能力的能力、超越一般性能指标的临床安全性证据以及人类-人工智能团队的公平临床决策。积极主动地解决这些问题可以为负责任的临床支持和值得信赖的技术部署铺平道路。
{"title":"Moving beyond the AI sales pitch - Empowering clinicians to ask the right questions about clinical AI.","authors":"Ibrahim Habli, Mark Sujan, Tom Lawton","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100179","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We challenge the dominant technology-centric narrative around clinical AI. To realise the true potential of the technology, clinicians must be empowered to take a whole-system perspective and assess the suitability of AI-supported tasks for their specific complex clinical setting. Key factors include the AI's capacity to augment human capabilities, evidence of clinical safety beyond general performance metrics and equitable clinical decision-making by the human-AI team. Proactively addressing these issues could pave the way for an accountable clinical buy-in and a trustworthy deployment of the technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The FHJ debate: Will artificial intelligence replace clinical decision making within our lifetimes? FHJ 辩论:人工智能会在我们有生之年取代临床决策吗?
Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100178
Joshua Hatherley, Anne Kinderlerer, Jens Christian Bjerring, Lauritz Aastrup Munch, Lynsey Threlfall
{"title":"The FHJ debate: Will artificial intelligence replace clinical decision making within our lifetimes?","authors":"Joshua Hatherley, Anne Kinderlerer, Jens Christian Bjerring, Lauritz Aastrup Munch, Lynsey Threlfall","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Future healthcare journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1