Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3305766
{"title":"IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society Publication Information","authors":"","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3305766","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3305766","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 3","pages":"C2-C2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71903684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3318396
Roba Abbas;Katina Michael;Kieran Conboy;Marijn Janssen;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Cleopatra Veloutsou;Thanos Papadopoulos;Rameshwar Dubey
The term research impact is variously defined in academic scholarship, by national and international research funding bodies, publishers, and other relevant entities, although common definitional elements exist. Concise definitions describe the term as relating to academic research that directly and or indirectly guides policymaking processes, by enabling evidence-based decision-making and or improving understanding of a given subject area or areas [1] . Underlying this and all definitions of research impact is the fundamental assumption that the outcome(s) of university research will serve the “public good” [2, p. 1368] .
{"title":"Publishing for Impact: Interdisciplinary Reflections","authors":"Roba Abbas;Katina Michael;Kieran Conboy;Marijn Janssen;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Cleopatra Veloutsou;Thanos Papadopoulos;Rameshwar Dubey","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3318396","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3318396","url":null,"abstract":"The term research impact is variously defined in academic scholarship, by national and international research funding bodies, publishers, and other relevant entities, although common definitional elements exist. Concise definitions describe the term as relating to academic research that directly and or indirectly guides policymaking processes, by enabling evidence-based decision-making and or improving understanding of a given subject area or areas \u0000<xref>[1]</xref>\u0000. Underlying this and all definitions of research impact is the fundamental assumption that the outcome(s) of university research will serve the “public good” \u0000<xref>[2, p. 1368]</xref>\u0000.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 3","pages":"201-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71903410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3313449
Katina Michael;Roba Abbas
The IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society (TTS or Transactions) is a publication of the IEEE Society on the Social Implications of technology (IEEE SSIT) established in 2020 [1] , [2] . The IEEE TTS is technically co-sponsored by the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, and the IEEE Computer Society. Since the publication’s establishment there has been a steady increase in submissions, and this is expected to continue. The IEEE TTS leadership is recruiting up to 30 Associate Editors and 7 Senior Editors as a complement to the current Editorial Board [3] . We present our first open call for recruitment of suitable candidates from academia, industry, government, and the third sector.
{"title":"Call for Senior Editors and Associate Editors of the IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society","authors":"Katina Michael;Roba Abbas","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3313449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3313449","url":null,"abstract":"The IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society (TTS or Transactions) is a publication of the IEEE Society on the Social Implications of technology (IEEE SSIT) established in 2020 \u0000<xref>[1]</xref>\u0000, \u0000<xref>[2]</xref>\u0000. The \u0000<italic>IEEE TTS</i>\u0000 is technically co-sponsored by the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, and the IEEE Computer Society. Since the publication’s establishment there has been a steady increase in submissions, and this is expected to continue. The \u0000<italic>IEEE TTS</i>\u0000 leadership is recruiting up to 30 Associate Editors and 7 Senior Editors as a complement to the current Editorial Board \u0000<xref>[3]</xref>\u0000. We present our first open call for recruitment of suitable candidates from academia, industry, government, and the third sector.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 3","pages":"196-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71903413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-21DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3305632
Jon Billsberry
Achieving publication in highly ranked journals is increasingly important for scholars’ career progression. But just as it becomes more important, it also becomes more competitive. This paper makes a contribution by advancing a stepwise strategy that can help scholars who have not previously published in top-ranked journals, but who have published in lower ranked journals, make the leap to publish in A* journals more achievable. At the heart of this strategy is the way new research projects are conceived. Instead of scholars developing new research projects driven by their knowledge and passions, the stepwise strategy is evidence-based. It requires that scholars choose their target journal, analyze relevant papers in that journal, and then design a study that will take the next step to extend the existing literature. In advocating this approach, I assert that research moves forward in steps, each one building on previously published studies. I also argue that the most important factor in determining whether or not a paper can be published in an A* journal is the establishment of a research question to which scholars reading that A* journal want to know the answer.
{"title":"A Stepwise Strategy for Upgrading Publication Outcomes to A* in Management","authors":"Jon Billsberry","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3305632","DOIUrl":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3305632","url":null,"abstract":"Achieving publication in highly ranked journals is increasingly important for scholars’ career progression. But just as it becomes more important, it also becomes more competitive. This paper makes a contribution by advancing a stepwise strategy that can help scholars who have not previously published in top-ranked journals, but who have published in lower ranked journals, make the leap to publish in A* journals more achievable. At the heart of this strategy is the way new research projects are conceived. Instead of scholars developing new research projects driven by their knowledge and passions, the stepwise strategy is evidence-based. It requires that scholars choose their target journal, analyze relevant papers in that journal, and then design a study that will take the next step to extend the existing literature. In advocating this approach, I assert that research moves forward in steps, each one building on previously published studies. I also argue that the most important factor in determining whether or not a paper can be published in an A* journal is the establishment of a research question to which scholars reading that A* journal want to know the answer.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 3","pages":"233-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62589675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-19DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3296991
Ilias O. Pappas;Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou;Leona Chandra Kruse;Sandeep Purao
Scholars acknowledge that achieving societal impact should be a key aim of research. However, societal impact usually becomes tangible only long after research completion, so that scholars can hardly report its evidence in a research article, if it is to be published in a timely manner. Interventionist research methods that involve engagement with stakeholders to generate solutions for real-world problem situations can provide a path towards direct societal impact. We argue that achieving such impact requires effective engagement with careful attention to the timing of engagement and inclusiveness of stakeholders – drawing on examples from our own research projects. Our analyses suggest that the research team needs to make choices to structure engagement efforts across research phases spanning problem definition, solution design, and solution evaluation. These choices define a space of possibilities that a research team can navigate based on considerations of access, research setting, research approach, and researcher expertise. We map these to three specific interventionist research approaches: Action Research, Clinical Research, and Action Design Research to highlight the alternatives. The paper concludes by pointing out that interventionist approaches can create favorable conditions but require the judicious exercise of choices by the research team to generate outcomes with direct societal impact.
{"title":"Practicing Effective Stakeholder Engagement for Impactful Research","authors":"Ilias O. Pappas;Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou;Leona Chandra Kruse;Sandeep Purao","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3296991","DOIUrl":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3296991","url":null,"abstract":"Scholars acknowledge that achieving societal impact should be a key aim of research. However, societal impact usually becomes tangible only long after research completion, so that scholars can hardly report its evidence in a research article, if it is to be published in a timely manner. Interventionist research methods that involve engagement with stakeholders to generate solutions for real-world problem situations can provide a path towards direct societal impact. We argue that achieving such impact requires effective engagement with careful attention to the timing of engagement and inclusiveness of stakeholders – drawing on examples from our own research projects. Our analyses suggest that the research team needs to make choices to structure engagement efforts across research phases spanning problem definition, solution design, and solution evaluation. These choices define a space of possibilities that a research team can navigate based on considerations of access, research setting, research approach, and researcher expertise. We map these to three specific interventionist research approaches: Action Research, Clinical Research, and Action Design Research to highlight the alternatives. The paper concludes by pointing out that interventionist approaches can create favorable conditions but require the judicious exercise of choices by the research team to generate outcomes with direct societal impact.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 3","pages":"248-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62589660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-12DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3291414
Sara Dolnicar
The journal review system has always been clouded by myth. The upholding of established myths and creation of new myths is not productive because it undermines the credibility and trustworthiness of the scholarly manuscript review system and hinders authors’ efforts to get their work published. If we aspire to creating important new knowledge and solutions for some of the world’s most pressing challenges and if we commit to academic publishing as the preferred avenue of quality control, integrity control and dissemination, we must trust the review system. Trust in review systems is best increased by dispelling myths and explaining unambiguously and transparently how the process works. This is the purpose of the present article. The article discusses seven myths that I encounter regularly both in my role as a journal editor and as a mentor of early career researchers. I share my views on each of those myths, hopefully presenting compelling and – where possible – evidence-based arguments that they are misrepresentations of how the publishing process in academic journals works. The discussion of myths leads to tangible recommendations for journal editors, reviewers and authors, which empower them to contribute pro-actively to the upholding of the high standards of scholarly research and the protection of its credibility and trustworthiness. High quality trustworthy research findings have the best chance of being adopted by governments and industry as a basis for decision making. The article concludes with a personal observation about how academic publishing has changed over the past 25 years and how the erosion of some traditional academic habits – such as curiosity driving research – represents a significant loss to the scientific community and society more broadly.
{"title":"Demystifying the Journal Review Process: An Editor’s Observations","authors":"Sara Dolnicar","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3291414","DOIUrl":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3291414","url":null,"abstract":"The journal review system has always been clouded by myth. The upholding of established myths and creation of new myths is not productive because it undermines the credibility and trustworthiness of the scholarly manuscript review system and hinders authors’ efforts to get their work published. If we aspire to creating important new knowledge and solutions for some of the world’s most pressing challenges and if we commit to academic publishing as the preferred avenue of quality control, integrity control and dissemination, we must trust the review system. Trust in review systems is best increased by dispelling myths and explaining unambiguously and transparently how the process works. This is the purpose of the present article. The article discusses seven myths that I encounter regularly both in my role as a journal editor and as a mentor of early career researchers. I share my views on each of those myths, hopefully presenting compelling and – where possible – evidence-based arguments that they are misrepresentations of how the publishing process in academic journals works. The discussion of myths leads to tangible recommendations for journal editors, reviewers and authors, which empower them to contribute pro-actively to the upholding of the high standards of scholarly research and the protection of its credibility and trustworthiness. High quality trustworthy research findings have the best chance of being adopted by governments and industry as a basis for decision making. The article concludes with a personal observation about how academic publishing has changed over the past 25 years and how the erosion of some traditional academic habits – such as curiosity driving research – represents a significant loss to the scientific community and society more broadly.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 3","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62589604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-14DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3278908
Mariarosaria Taddeo;Paul Jones;Roba Abbas;Kathleen Vogel;Katina Michael
Cybersecurity continues to be a key element of national security. Given that critical infrastructure is powered by digital systems, any disruption to the flow of vital services has the potential effect of causing harm to citizens, organizations, and government entities. The availability of service offerings may be subject to attacks by AI on various aspects of cyber-physical-social systems. And no system is foolproof. Inasmuch as AI can be a threat to cybersecurity, it can also be used to combat attempts at systems penetration through deep learning and other capabilities. However, focusing our attention on AI alone does not allow for a sufficiently accurate understanding of the complex ecosystem that contributes to the conflicting scenarios that are possible in the context of AI in cybersecurity. This Special Issue provides insights into the broader socio-technical ecosystem considerations that are required for the achievement of system robustness, allowing for a more intricate and balanced understanding of the role of AI in cybersecurity, at various levels relevant to individuals, organizations, and communities/ society. Fundamentally, the socio-technical approach calls for an emphasis on people, processes, and technology, and not solely on the shiny gadgetry that we call products. There are four main themes that form the emergent research agenda: 1) the cybersecurity ecosystem that demands an interdisciplinary approach; 2) the state of the art technology development processes and landscape that provide and facilitate cybersecurity mechanisms and competitive advantage through AI; 3) the interconnected and multifaceted nature of the social, technical, and environmental subsystems in the cybersecurity ecosystem; and 4) the emphasis on human requirements and values, inclusive of end-user capacity and awareness, organizational capability and skills development, and societal considerations inclusive of the public interest.
{"title":"Socio-Technical Ecosystem Considerations: An Emergent Research Agenda for AI in Cybersecurity","authors":"Mariarosaria Taddeo;Paul Jones;Roba Abbas;Kathleen Vogel;Katina Michael","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3278908","DOIUrl":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3278908","url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity continues to be a key element of national security. Given that critical infrastructure is powered by digital systems, any disruption to the flow of vital services has the potential effect of causing harm to citizens, organizations, and government entities. The availability of service offerings may be subject to attacks by AI on various aspects of cyber-physical-social systems. And no system is foolproof. Inasmuch as AI can be a threat to cybersecurity, it can also be used to combat attempts at systems penetration through deep learning and other capabilities. However, focusing our attention on AI alone does not allow for a sufficiently accurate understanding of the complex ecosystem that contributes to the conflicting scenarios that are possible in the context of AI in cybersecurity. This Special Issue provides insights into the broader socio-technical ecosystem considerations that are required for the achievement of system robustness, allowing for a more intricate and balanced understanding of the role of AI in cybersecurity, at various levels relevant to individuals, organizations, and communities/ society. Fundamentally, the socio-technical approach calls for an emphasis on people, processes, and technology, and not solely on the shiny gadgetry that we call products. There are four main themes that form the emergent research agenda: 1) the cybersecurity ecosystem that demands an interdisciplinary approach; 2) the state of the art technology development processes and landscape that provide and facilitate cybersecurity mechanisms and competitive advantage through AI; 3) the interconnected and multifaceted nature of the social, technical, and environmental subsystems in the cybersecurity ecosystem; and 4) the emphasis on human requirements and values, inclusive of end-user capacity and awareness, organizational capability and skills development, and societal considerations inclusive of the public interest.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 2","pages":"112-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8566059/10153436/10153439.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44542097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-14DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3280757
Terri Bookman
The IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology (SSIT) announces the selection of Roba Abbas of the University of Wollongong, Australia, as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society (TTS), beginning May 9, 2023. Professor Katina Michael of Arizona State University, USA, has already started her second accomplished three-year term as TTS EIC. Due to the rising number of submissions and international growth of SSIT publications, the Board of Governors has approved the co-EIC model across its publications. “Our new Co-EIC is internationally recognized, as a leading voice in the socio-technical field, chairing the Socio-Technical Systems Technical Committee at the IEEE Society on the Social Implications of Technology, and bringing a unique skillset to the T&S community at large. Dr. Abbas’ interdisciplinary skillset is evidenced in her experience across Business, Informatics, and Engineering Schools and in her time in industry,” said Michael.
{"title":"Roba Abbas Appointed New Co-Editor-in-Chief of IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society","authors":"Terri Bookman","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3280757","DOIUrl":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3280757","url":null,"abstract":"The IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology (SSIT) announces the selection of Roba Abbas of the University of Wollongong, Australia, as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society (TTS), beginning May 9, 2023. Professor Katina Michael of Arizona State University, USA, has already started her second accomplished three-year term as TTS EIC. Due to the rising number of submissions and international growth of SSIT publications, the Board of Governors has approved the co-EIC model across its publications. “Our new Co-EIC is internationally recognized, as a leading voice in the socio-technical field, chairing the Socio-Technical Systems Technical Committee at the IEEE Society on the Social Implications of Technology, and bringing a unique skillset to the T&S community at large. Dr. Abbas’ interdisciplinary skillset is evidenced in her experience across Business, Informatics, and Engineering Schools and in her time in industry,” said Michael.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 2","pages":"110-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8566059/10153436/10153438.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42706038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-14DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3280109
Katina Michael;Roba Abbas;George Roussos
Modern artificial intelligence is inherently paradoxical in many ways. While AI aims to increase automation, it also requires more intimate human involvement to reflect on the insights generated (automation paradox). While AI results in job displacement, it also creates new jobs, some simply to provide the necessary support systems for those newly unemployed (transition paradox). And as generative AI takes away control over the creative process, it also offers new creative opportunities (creativity paradox). This article considers another paradox, that relates to the fact that computational systems created using AI can be used both for public good in civilian applications and for harm across a range of application areas and settings [A1]. This contradiction is explored within an organizational and governmental context, where modern AI relies on data which might be externally or internally-sourced [A2]. External data sources [A3] are inclusive of open-source intelligence (OS-INT), such as information available on the Internet and the dark web, and internal data sources may include proprietary data found within an organizational or a wider governmental context [A4]. A further relevant consideration is the expanding role of the Internet of Things to support smart infrastructures, which has created new vulnerabilities [A5].
{"title":"AI in Cybersecurity: The Paradox","authors":"Katina Michael;Roba Abbas;George Roussos","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3280109","DOIUrl":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3280109","url":null,"abstract":"Modern artificial intelligence is inherently paradoxical in many ways. While AI aims to increase automation, it also requires more intimate human involvement to reflect on the insights generated (automation paradox). While AI results in job displacement, it also creates new jobs, some simply to provide the necessary support systems for those newly unemployed (transition paradox). And as generative AI takes away control over the creative process, it also offers new creative opportunities (creativity paradox). This article considers another paradox, that relates to the fact that computational systems created using AI can be used both for public good in civilian applications and for harm across a range of application areas and settings [A1]. This contradiction is explored within an organizational and governmental context, where modern AI relies on data which might be externally or internally-sourced [A2]. External data sources [A3] are inclusive of open-source intelligence (OS-INT), such as information available on the Internet and the dark web, and internal data sources may include proprietary data found within an organizational or a wider governmental context [A4]. A further relevant consideration is the expanding role of the Internet of Things to support smart infrastructures, which has created new vulnerabilities [A5].","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 2","pages":"104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8566059/10153436/10153442.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47052208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-14DOI: 10.1109/TTS.2023.3276155
{"title":"IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society Publication Information","authors":"","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3276155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3276155","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 2","pages":"C2-C2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8566059/10153436/10153441.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50354284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：