Intensive care research最新文献

Purpose: As the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (2021) recommended, patients with sepsis should be given a liquid infusion of 30 ml/kg (ideal body weight). However, the strategy may result in insufficient resuscitation for obese patients with sepsis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of the initial resuscitation strategy in obese sepsis patients.

Materials and methods: A computer search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and other databases collected cohort studies from the beginning of the survey to December 2021 to include articles evaluating initial resuscitation strategies for sepsis-obese patients.

Results: Of the six studies included, five used ideal body weight infusion strategies, and three used actual body weight infusion strategies. Differences in fluid volume were observed between the two strategies, but no significant difference was observed in the mortality of obese sepsis patients. In addition, there may be an infusion strategy other than the above two infusion methods, and the safety and efficacy of the new infusion strategy are unclear. The obesity paradox has been observed in most infusion strategies.

Conclusion: The association between obesity and infusion strategy has rarely been investigated in patients with sepsis and septic shock, and the existing results are conflicting. The risk of bias in all included studies was moderate or high. Before providing broad recommendations on the optimal first resuscitation approach to lower the chance of mortality, further clinical trials, and prospective research need to be done.

Background: Awake prone positioning has been used for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, but the results are contradictory. We aimed to highlight the role of awake prone positioning combined with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in severe COVID-19 patients infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: From June 12 to December 7, 2021, we successfully performed prone position(PP) combined with high-flow nasal oxygen(HFNO) therapy on two patients infected with the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. HFNO was prescribed to reach SpO₂ ≥ 92%. PP was proposed to patients with PaO₂/FiO₂(P/F) < 150 mmHg. Arterial blood gas (ABG) and hemodynamic were monitored before and after PP sessions. The target time of PP was more than 12 h per day and could be appropriately shortened according to the patient's tolerance. Relevant clinical data, HFNO parameters, PICCO parameters, P/F ratio and PP duration were obtained from medical records.

Results: A total of 23 PP sessions and 6 PP sessions combined with HFNO were performed in case 1 and case 2, respectively. Compared with values before PP, GEDI, ELWI and Qs/Qt decreased significantly (GEDI: 869.50 ± 60.50 ml/m² vs. 756.86 ± 88.25 ml/m²; ELWI: 13.64 ± 2.82 ml/kg vs. 12.43 ± 2.50 ml/kg; Qs/Qt: 15.32 ± 6.52% vs. 12.24 ± 5.39%; all p < 0.05), Meanwhile, the oxygenation improved significantly (P/F: 184.50 ± 51.92 mmHg vs. 234.21 ± 88.84 mmHg, p < 0.05), The chest CT revealed the lung infiltrates improved significantly after PP. Both cases were discharged to a dedicated COVID-19 ward without requiring intubation.

Conclusions: Combining PP with HFNO could be a useful treatment strategy for avoiding intubation in severe COVID-19 patients infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 to improve pulmonary vascular involvement, improve oxygenation and avoid intubation, but further studies are needed to validate our approach.

Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which primarily infects the lower airways and binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on alveolar epithelial cells. ACE2 is widely expressed not only in the lungs but also in the cardiovascular system. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 can also damage the myocardium. This report aimed to highlight decreased heart rate variability (HRV) and cardiac injury caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Materials and methods: We evaluated three COVID-19 patients who died. Patients' data were collected from electronic medical records. We collected patient's information, including baseline information, lab results, body temperature, heart rate (HR), clinical outcome and other related data. We calculated the HRV and the difference between the expected and actual heart rate changes as the body temperature increased.

Results: As of March 14, 2020, 3 (2.2%) of 136 patients with COVID-19 in Tianjin died in the early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic. The immediate cause of death for Case 1, Case 2, and Case 3 was cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and cardiac arrest, respectively. The HRV were substantially decreased in the whole course of all three cases. The actual increases in heart rate were 5 beats/min, 13 beats/min, and 4 beats/min, respectively, less than expected as their temperature increased. Troponin I and Creatine Kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) were substantially increased only in Case 3, for whom the diagnosis of virus-related cardiac injury could not be made until day 7. In all three cases, decreased in HRV and HR changes occurred earlier than increases in cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponin I and CK-MB).

Conclusions: In conclusion, COVID-19 could affect HRV and counteract tachycardia in response to increases in body temperature. The decreases of HRV and HR changes happened earlier than the increases of myocardial markers (troponin I and CK-MB). It suggested the decreases of HRV and HR changes might help predict cardiac injury earlier than myocardial markers in COVID-19, thus its early identification might help improve patient prognosis.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44231-022-00024-1.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a ~ 40% mortality rate with an increasing prevalence exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Mechanical ventilation is the primary means for life-saving support to buy time for lung healing in ARDS patients, however, it can also lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Effective strategies to reduce or prevent VILI are necessary but are not currently delivered. Therefore, we aim at evaluating the current imaging technologies to visualize where pressure and volume being delivered to the lung during mechanical ventilation; and combining plasma biomarkers to guide management of mechanical ventilation. We searched PubMed and Medline using keywords and analyzed the literature, including both animal models and human studies, to examine the independent use of computed tomography (CT) to evaluate lung mechanics, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to guide ventilation, ultrasound to monitor lung injury, and plasma biomarkers to indicate status of lung pathophysiology. This investigation has led to our proposal of the combination of imaging and biomarkers to precisely deliver mechanical ventilation to improve patient outcomes in ARDS.

Purpose: Significant results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be properly weighed. This study adopted fragility index (FI) to evaluate the robustness of significant dichotomous outcomes from RCTs on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment.

Materials and methods: ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed were searched from inception to July 31, 2021. FIs were calculated and their distribution was depicted. FI's categorical influential factors were analyzed. Spearman correlation coefficient (r _s) was reported for the relationship between FI and the continuous characteristics of RCTs.

Results: Fifty RCTs with 120 outcomes in 7869 patients were included. The FI distribution was abnormal with median 3 (interquartile range 1-7, P = 0.0001). The FIs and robustness were affected by the outcomes of interest, various patient populations, and interventions (T = 18.215,16.667, 23.107; P = 0.02,0.0001, 0.001, respectively). A cubic relationship between the FIs and absolute difference of events between groups with R square of 0.848 (T = 215.828, P = 0.0001, R square = 0.865) was observed. A strong negative logarithmic relationship existed between FI and the P value with R square = - 0.834.

Conclusion: The robustness of significant dichotomous outcomes of COVID-19 treatments was fragile and affected by the outcomes of interest, patients, interventions, P value, and absolute difference of events between the groups. FI was an useful quantitative metric for the binary significant outcomes on COVID-19 treatments.

Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021272455).

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44231-022-00027-y.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious condition that can arise following direct or indirect acute lung injury (ALI). It is heterogeneous and has a high mortality rate. Supportive care is the mainstay of treatment and there is no definitive pharmacological treatment as yet. In nonclinical studies, neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat appears to show benefit in ARDS without inhibiting the host immune defense in cases of infection. In clinical studies, the efficacy of sivelestat in the treatment of ARDS remains controversial. The currently available evidence suggests that sivelestat may show some benefit in the treatment of ARDS, although large, randomized controlled trials are needed in specific pathophysiological conditions to explore these potential benefits.

The prevalence of spinal tumors is rare in comparison to brain tumors which encompass most central nervous system tumors. Tumors of the spine can be divided into primary and metastatic tumors with the latter being the most common presentation. Primary tumors are subdivided based on their location on the spinal column and in the spinal cord into intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and primary bone tumors. Back pain is a common presentation in spine cancer patients; however, other radicular pain may be present. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for intradural extramedullary and intramedullary tumors. Plain radiographs are used in the initial diagnosis of primary bone tumors while Computed tomography (CT) and MRI may often be necessary for further characterization. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice for spinal tumors and may be curative for well circumscribed lesions. However, intralesional resection along with adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy can be indicated for patients that would experience increased morbidity from damage to nearby neurological structures caused by resection with wide margins. Even with the current treatment options, the prognosis for aggressive spinal cancer remains poor. Advances in novel treatments including molecular targeting, immunotherapy and stem cell therapy provide the potential for greater control of malignant and metastatic tumors of the spine.