In 2021, UpToDate began offering continuing medical education (CME) planned and delivered by patients. The patient-authored medical topic reviews focus on lessons learned from interactions with the healthcare system and emphasise quality of life for those living with specific conditions. Having access to the patient voice at the point of care provides clinicians with a perspective that can improve patient-provider communication and promote shared decision-making. Participants who viewed the patient-authored topics were emailed a survey about the content; several responses indicated that the new topics were useful in clinical practice. While positive responses demonstrate that clinicians value the patient perspective, we also received replies from participants and from the patient authors themselves indicating there is more work to be done in developing patient-led CME. As more patients are invited to join the conversation, their expertise will be increasingly recognised as integral to CME.
Health professional education and post-graduate training programs, including residencies, fellowships, and other post-graduate training experiences, may encourage or require trainee participation in continuing education (CE) activity planning and development. Providers of CE should ensure appropriate mentorship and faculty guidance during development of the activity and provide direction on the expectations of adult learning principles (e.g. identification of an educational gap; development of measurable learning objectives; inclusion of independent, balanced, and evidenced-based content; use of active learning techniques; and incorporation of learning assessment methods). Nonetheless, there is no established best practice or approach for how CE providers should ensure trainees are prepared to serve as CE activity faculty. New practitioners provided with an opportunity to participate may be unsure of where to begin and may be hesitant to engage in this new activity. In this manuscript, authors delineate key principles to incorporate when introducing trainees to CE activity development and share outcomes associated with a comparison of trainee- vs. faculty-developed and delivered CE.
Black individuals in the United States are less likely to use medication to prevent HIV (pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP) than White individuals and are significantly more likely to receive a new HIV diagnosis. Because of America's long history of unethical medical and research practices and ongoing prejudice and bias, Black Americans have mistrust towards the medical community. This distrust, along with the social determinants of health, leads to low participation in health care. Health interventions at culturally "safe" and familiar venues are a popular strategy to engage Black Americans in health care. In the United States, barbershops are staples of the Black community and the utility of barbershops as a venue for delivering interventions has been successfully explored. We describe FADE OUT HIV, a program designed to increase barberknowledge of prevalence of HIV in the Black community; facilitatediscussions between Black barbers and their Black clients about HIVexposure, prevention, and treatment; provide free HIV tests forbarbers' clients; and educate community clinicians via live andenduring webcasts about HIV prevention and treatment. Clinician education was designed to facilitate HIV screening and ensure that the barber clients would be referred to clinicians who were knowledgeable about HIV. The learning objectives of the education were focused on barriers that prevent HIV screening and PrEP uptake and strategies to overcome these barriers, monitoring recommendations for people using PrEP, the benefits and limitations of new and in-development PrEP, and the importance of rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). As a result of this programme, 308 HIV tests were administered to barber clients at hosted events in Los Angeles and clinician knowledge and competence increased by 33% and 34%, respectively.
Throughout history, healthcare disparities have contributed harm to patient's physical, mental, and financial wellbeing. Use of continuing professional development (CPD) can relay practical application of strategies to mitigate healthcare disparities. However, there is limited data on the impact of disparities focused CPD. In this article, we summarise quantitative data surrounding seven CPD programmes with a focus on healthcare disparities. In totality 41,588 healthcare providers interacted with educational content in these programmes. Learners responding to assessment questions yielded a 25% improvement in knowledge-based questions and a 27% improvement competence-based questions (p < 0.05 for each). Lastly, 1101 (2.5%) learners participated in a post-activity evaluation. Of those, 59% reported use of the information from these CPD programmes to reinforce their current practice, while 34% planned to make changes in their current practice to implement strategies to reduce or mitigate healthcare disparities. These findings show promise for use of CPD to improve awareness and help healthcare providers understand and mitigate disparities.

