首页 > 最新文献

Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine最新文献

英文 中文
A Case Report of Carotid Cavernous Fistula: A Commonly Missed Diagnosis. 颈动脉海绵窦瘘1例:常被误诊。
Pub Date : 2026-01-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.5070/M5.52242
Rosalind Wu Ma, Dustin Harris

Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is an ophthalmologic emergency due to an acute rise in intra-orbital pressure and can result in permanent vision loss, oftentimes requiring emergent surgical decompression. Orbital compartment syndrome most commonly occurs due to recent trauma and is often easily diagnosed by history and physical exam. However, there are other causes of OCS where a more subacute/chronic rise in pressure can lead to an atypical presentation. This is a case report of a 48-year-old male who presented with left eye pain and swelling for the past 6 months. The patient had seen two ophthalmologists prior to his emergency department (ED) presentation who had prescribed him an antibiotic ointment, oral steroids, and steroid eye drops. The physical exam in the ED was concerning for increased intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and decreased vision. Ophthalmology was consulted and requested magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to assess a vascular etiology given tortuous retinal vasculature. Emergent surgical decompression was deferred due to chronicity of symptoms, and patient was started on dorzolamide/timolol and brimonidine eye drops as well as intravenous (IV) acetazolamide with subsequent improvement in IOP. Imaging revealed a left carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF), and the patient was admitted to neurosurgery. Patient successfully had an embolization with subsequent normalization of IOP and improvement of symptoms. This case is a good example of how non-traumatic causes of OCS can lead to misdiagnosis and how surgical decompression could potentially be deferred in subacute OCS.

Topics: Ocular compartment syndrome, carotid cavernous fistula, eye pain, eye swelling, vision loss.

眼窝腔室综合征(OCS)是一种眼科急症,由于眼窝内压力急性升高,可导致永久性视力丧失,通常需要紧急手术减压。眶间室综合征多因近期外伤而发生,通过病史和体格检查容易诊断。然而,还有其他原因引起的OCS,其中亚急性/慢性血压升高可导致非典型表现。这是一个48岁男性的病例报告,他在过去的6个月里表现为左眼疼痛和肿胀。患者在急诊科(ED)就诊前见过两位眼科医生,医生给他开了抗生素软膏、口服类固醇和类固醇滴眼液。在急诊科的体格检查是关于眼压升高(IOP)和视力下降。我们咨询了眼科医生,并要求磁共振血管造影(MRA)来评估视网膜血管弯曲的血管病因。由于症状的慢性,紧急手术减压被推迟,患者开始使用多唑胺/噻莫洛尔和溴莫尼定滴眼液以及静脉(IV)乙酰唑胺,随后IOP有所改善。影像学显示左侧颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF),患者被送往神经外科。患者成功栓塞,随后IOP正常化,症状改善。这个病例是一个很好的例子,说明非创伤性原因的OCS如何导致误诊,以及亚急性OCS的手术减压如何可能被推迟。主题:眼隔室综合征,颈动脉海绵状瘘,眼痛,眼肿,视力减退。
{"title":"A Case Report of Carotid Cavernous Fistula: A Commonly Missed Diagnosis.","authors":"Rosalind Wu Ma, Dustin Harris","doi":"10.5070/M5.52242","DOIUrl":"10.5070/M5.52242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is an ophthalmologic emergency due to an acute rise in intra-orbital pressure and can result in permanent vision loss, oftentimes requiring emergent surgical decompression. Orbital compartment syndrome most commonly occurs due to recent trauma and is often easily diagnosed by history and physical exam. However, there are other causes of OCS where a more subacute/chronic rise in pressure can lead to an atypical presentation. This is a case report of a 48-year-old male who presented with left eye pain and swelling for the past 6 months. The patient had seen two ophthalmologists prior to his emergency department (ED) presentation who had prescribed him an antibiotic ointment, oral steroids, and steroid eye drops. The physical exam in the ED was concerning for increased intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and decreased vision. Ophthalmology was consulted and requested magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to assess a vascular etiology given tortuous retinal vasculature. Emergent surgical decompression was deferred due to chronicity of symptoms, and patient was started on dorzolamide/timolol and brimonidine eye drops as well as intravenous (IV) acetazolamide with subsequent improvement in IOP. Imaging revealed a left carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF), and the patient was admitted to neurosurgery. Patient successfully had an embolization with subsequent normalization of IOP and improvement of symptoms. This case is a good example of how non-traumatic causes of OCS can lead to misdiagnosis and how surgical decompression could potentially be deferred in subacute OCS.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Ocular compartment syndrome, carotid cavernous fistula, eye pain, eye swelling, vision loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"V1-V5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12880886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Multimodal Approach to Lateral Canthotomy and Cantholysis Training for Emergency Medicine Trainees: A Simulation Training Package. 急诊医学受训者侧眦切开术和峡部溶解训练的多模式方法:模拟训练包。
Pub Date : 2026-01-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.5070/M5.52351
Haris Shoaib, Yunus K Hussain, Shiza Shoaib, Sulaiman Hussain, Haider A Chaudhary, Muhammad Subed Ali, Cara Jennings, Tara Smith
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>This simulation is intended for emergency medicine residents.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC) is a sight-saving procedure for orbital compartment syndrome (OCS).1 Due to the rarity of OCS, emergency-medicine trainees often have limited exposure and low procedural confidence. In a questionnaire we found that trainees have low confidence levels in performing the procedure attributed to the low incidence of OCS and the scarcity of training opportunities. Existing literature describes LCC task trainers with creation of simulation models, but few provide a reproducible multimodal package adaptable for multiple training centres.2,3 Our innovation combines presentation, instructional video, gamified quiz, and hands-on practicer with low fidelity models. Unlike previous studies referencing the use of pre-made or cadaveric-based models, this design offers detailed guidance on model assembly using commonly available and low-cost materials.2,3 We designed and tested a multimodal training approach to optimize trainee confidence and competence in recognizing OSC and performing the LCC procedure. This aligns with recent calls in medical education for innovative, cost-effective simulation that maintains clear guidance and instructions while overcoming financial and/or logistical barriers.4,5.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this session, learners should be able to: 1) recognize the clinical features of OCS, 2) describe the indications and steps of performing LCC, 3) perform a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis procedure on a low-fidelity model, and 4) demonstrate improved confidence in recognizing and managing OCS.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>The training uses a multimodal structure involving the following resources: 1) Instructor-led presentation on OCS and LCC with a step-by-step guide (Appendix A), 2) gamified quiz (Appendix B), 3) a procedural demonstration video, 4) a procedural handout containing a step-by-step guide (Appendix C), 5) a low-fidelity model of the orbit constructed from inexpensive materials, and 6) hands-on procedural practice with trainer feedback.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>Trainees' confidence and perceived competence in performing the procedure were assessed using a 10-point Likert scale before and after the training, in addition to collection of qualitative feedback via free-text comments. Trainees also rated all educational components of the course using a 10- point Likert scale. Statistical significance was calculated using paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of thirty-four emergency medicine trainees participated in this multi-national training simulation package across three centers within the UK, completing pre- and post-intervention feedback. We observed a significant improvement in participants' self-assessed confidence levels when comparing theoretical knowledge (5.0 ± 2.5 to 8
观众:这个模拟是为急诊医师设计的。背景:侧眦切开术和眦溶解术(LCC)是治疗眶间室综合征(OCS)的一种视力保护手术由于OCS的罕见性,急诊医学学员往往接触有限,程序信心低。在问卷调查中,我们发现由于OCS发生率低和培训机会稀缺,受培训者对执行程序的信心水平较低。现有文献描述了LCC任务训练器与仿真模型的创建,但很少提供可重复的多模态包适用于多个培训中心2,3我们的创新结合了演示,教学视频,游戏化测验和动手实践与低保真模型。不像以前的研究引用使用预制或尸体为基础的模型,这个设计提供了详细的指导模型组装使用普遍可用和低成本的材料我们设计并测试了一种多模式培训方法,以优化受训人员识别OSC和执行LCC程序的信心和能力。这与最近医学教育中对创新的、具有成本效益的模拟的呼吁一致,这种模拟在克服财政和/或后勤障碍的同时保持明确的指导和指示。教育目标:在本课程结束时,学习者应该能够:1)认识OCS的临床特征,2)描述LCC的适应症和步骤,3)在低保真模型上进行侧眦切开术和眦溶解术,以及4)提高识别和管理OCS的信心。教育方法:培训采用多模式结构,涉及以下资源:1)由讲师指导的OCS和LCC演示,并附有一步一步的指南(附录a), 2)游戏化测验(附录B), 3)程序演示视频,4)包含一步一步指南的程序讲义(附录C), 5)由廉价材料构建的低保真轨道模型,以及6)有培训师反馈的实际程序实践。研究方法:除了通过自由文本评论收集定性反馈外,在培训前后使用10分李克特量表评估受训人员在执行过程中的信心和感知能力。受训者还使用10分李克特量表对课程的所有教育内容进行评分。采用配对t检验计算统计学显著性。结果:共有34名急诊医学学员参加了英国三个中心的多国培训模拟包,完成了干预前和干预后的反馈。我们观察到,当比较理论知识(5.0±2.5到8.7±1.7,p < 0.0001)和程序能力(4.1±2.8到8.9±1.5,p < 0.0001)时,参与者自我评估的信心水平有显著提高。培训包的所有教育内容都得到了很高的评价,平均得分在8.7到10分之间(以10分李克特量表衡量)。所有参与的受训人员都支持每年向急诊医学受训人员提供一揽子培训的想法。定性反馈进一步支持了实际仿真的价值。讨论:考虑到OCS的严重临床后果,需要诊断和操作能力。这个培训包显示了受训者对罕见但关键的急诊科程序的信心和能力的显著提高。低保真度模型和仿真包是可复制的,具有成本效益,并且可以跨培训中心扩展。主题:模拟,急诊医学,眶间室综合征,侧眦切开术,眦松解,操作技巧,低保真模型。
{"title":"A Multimodal Approach to Lateral Canthotomy and Cantholysis Training for Emergency Medicine Trainees: A Simulation Training Package.","authors":"Haris Shoaib, Yunus K Hussain, Shiza Shoaib, Sulaiman Hussain, Haider A Chaudhary, Muhammad Subed Ali, Cara Jennings, Tara Smith","doi":"10.5070/M5.52351","DOIUrl":"10.5070/M5.52351","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;This simulation is intended for emergency medicine residents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC) is a sight-saving procedure for orbital compartment syndrome (OCS).1 Due to the rarity of OCS, emergency-medicine trainees often have limited exposure and low procedural confidence. In a questionnaire we found that trainees have low confidence levels in performing the procedure attributed to the low incidence of OCS and the scarcity of training opportunities. Existing literature describes LCC task trainers with creation of simulation models, but few provide a reproducible multimodal package adaptable for multiple training centres.2,3 Our innovation combines presentation, instructional video, gamified quiz, and hands-on practicer with low fidelity models. Unlike previous studies referencing the use of pre-made or cadaveric-based models, this design offers detailed guidance on model assembly using commonly available and low-cost materials.2,3 We designed and tested a multimodal training approach to optimize trainee confidence and competence in recognizing OSC and performing the LCC procedure. This aligns with recent calls in medical education for innovative, cost-effective simulation that maintains clear guidance and instructions while overcoming financial and/or logistical barriers.4,5.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of this session, learners should be able to: 1) recognize the clinical features of OCS, 2) describe the indications and steps of performing LCC, 3) perform a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis procedure on a low-fidelity model, and 4) demonstrate improved confidence in recognizing and managing OCS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The training uses a multimodal structure involving the following resources: 1) Instructor-led presentation on OCS and LCC with a step-by-step guide (Appendix A), 2) gamified quiz (Appendix B), 3) a procedural demonstration video, 4) a procedural handout containing a step-by-step guide (Appendix C), 5) a low-fidelity model of the orbit constructed from inexpensive materials, and 6) hands-on procedural practice with trainer feedback.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Trainees' confidence and perceived competence in performing the procedure were assessed using a 10-point Likert scale before and after the training, in addition to collection of qualitative feedback via free-text comments. Trainees also rated all educational components of the course using a 10- point Likert scale. Statistical significance was calculated using paired t-tests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of thirty-four emergency medicine trainees participated in this multi-national training simulation package across three centers within the UK, completing pre- and post-intervention feedback. We observed a significant improvement in participants' self-assessed confidence levels when comparing theoretical knowledge (5.0 ± 2.5 to 8","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"I1-I18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12880893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Decision-Making Case: Pulmonary Embolism. 临床决策病例:肺栓塞。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.52339
James H Lee, Linda Herman
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>Emergency medicine residents and medical students on emergency medicine rotations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common diagnosis with an annual incidence of approximately one in 1000 persons.1,2,3 There is a wide variety of clinical presentations, ranging from the asymptomatic patient to shock and cardiac arrest. Most patients have chest pain and shortness of breath (SOB), but PE may also present with mild or nonspecific symptoms, such as dizziness, cough, wheezing, syncope and hemoptysis. These patients have risk for clinical decompensation.4,5 It is therefore critical to maintain a high level of suspicion because misdiagnosis is common. There are risks attributable to the diagnostic evaluation and treatment, including radiation exposure, contrast reactions and complications related to anticoagulant therapy. Work up requires an understanding of clinical pretest probability, diagnostic algorithms such as the modified Wells scoring system and the revised Geneva scoring system, the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC), and interpretation of D-dimer testing and diagnostic imaging.6,7 Management requires anticoagulation, but for the unstable patient may also require respiratory and hemodynamic support, systemic or catheter-directed thrombolysis, catheter or surgical embolectomy, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) if available. Understanding the diagnostic evaluation and management of pulmonary embolism is essential for the practicing emergency medicine physician.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of the clinical decision-making case, the learner will: 1) gain familiarity with clinical decision-making (CDM) case format to be used in the new American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) certification examination starting in 2026, 2) demonstrate the ability to obtain a focused history and physical examination and develop appropriate differential diagnoses for chest pain and dyspnea, 3) demonstrate understanding of clinical decisions rules to estimate the pre-test probability for pulmonary embolism and the application of rules to guide appropriate diagnostic testing, 4) recognize high clinical suspicion for pulmonary embolism and indication for empirical treatment, 5) recognize the unstable patient and provide appropriate hemodynamic and respiratory support, 6) understand indications for thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy in unstable pulmonary embolism, 7) demonstrate communication skills with patients and specialists across the health care spectrum, and 8) arrange appropriate disposition for the unstable patient with a pulmonary embolism.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>This session is based on the clinical decision-making (CDM) case format introduced by ABEM to be used in the oral certification examination starting in 2026.8 The materials were modeled after the samples provided in the instructional videos on the ABEM Qualifying Exam P
听众:急诊医学住院医师和急诊医学轮转的医学生。简介:肺栓塞(PE)是一种常见的诊断,年发病率约为千分之一有各种各样的临床表现,从无症状的病人到休克和心脏骤停。大多数患者有胸痛和呼吸短促(SOB),但PE也可能出现轻微或非特异性症状,如头晕、咳嗽、喘息、晕厥和咯血。这些患者有临床失代偿的风险4,5因此,保持高度的怀疑是至关重要的,因为误诊是常见的。存在可归因于诊断评估和治疗的风险,包括辐射暴露、对比反应和抗凝治疗相关的并发症。工作需要了解临床预测概率,诊断算法,如改进的Wells评分系统和修订的Geneva评分系统,肺栓塞排除标准(PERC),以及d -二聚体测试和诊断成像的解释6,7治疗需要抗凝,但对于不稳定的患者,可能还需要呼吸和血流动力学支持,全身或导管溶栓,导管或手术栓塞切除术,或体外膜氧合(ECMO)(如果可用)。了解肺栓塞的诊断、评价和处理对急诊医师的执业至关重要。培养目标:在临床决策案例结束时,学习者将:1)熟悉将于2026年开始在美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)认证考试中使用的临床决策(CDM)病例格式;2)展示获得重点病史和体格检查的能力,并对胸痛和呼吸困难进行适当的鉴别诊断;3)了解临床决策规则,以估计肺栓塞的检测前概率,并应用规则指导适当的诊断测试,4)识别临床对肺栓塞的高度怀疑和经验治疗的指征,5)识别不稳定患者并提供适当的血流动力学和呼吸支持,6)了解不稳定肺栓塞的溶栓治疗或栓塞切除术的指征,7)展示与病人和专家的沟通技巧,以及8)为不稳定的肺栓塞患者安排适当的处置。教学方法:本课程基于ABEM引入的临床决策(CDM)案例格式,将于2026.8开始用于ABEM口头认证考试。材料以2024年12月发布的ABEM资格考试第二部分教学视频中的样本为模型。我们向讲师提供了有关临床表现、鉴别诊断和治疗的幻灯片,以供课后汇报。本案例使用18名住院医师志愿者进行测试,这些志愿者来自研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的急诊医学住院医师项目,他们来自PGY 1-2年级。这是我们使用CDM格式的第一次模拟董事会会议。研究方法:在课程开始之前,学习者被要求完成一项预调查,以了解学习者之前是否看过展示CDM案例的ABEM教学视频。然后,在汇报会议之后,向学习者和评估者征求即时反馈。居民被要求用1-5的李克特量表(5为优秀)评估该病例的教育价值。评估员被要求对住院医师进行评分,通过指定学习者是否能够提供关于所需的适当的历史信息、体格检查结果、所需的诊断测试、鉴别诊断、诊断结果的解释、达到正确的诊断、病人的管理和处置以及协调护理过渡的正确反应。审查员会在评价表上为每个回答打上“是”或“否”。结果:18名住院医师(9名PGY1住院医师和9名PGY2住院医师)完成病例。当时我们是一个新的住院医师项目,还没有任何PGY3住院医师。平均分28.9分(满分29分)。预调查显示,9名EM PGY1中只有2名和9名EM PGY2中只有4名看过ABEM视频。18位居民完成了模拟后立即进行的事后调查。学习者对案例的教育价值评价为4.9/5 (PGY1为5.0/5,PGY2为4.9/5)。 15名居民(8/9 PGY1, 7/9 PGY2)表示,该病例“在某种程度上”增加了他们对疾病过程关键概念的理解,而3名居民回应说,他们遇到过类似的患者,没有学到任何新的东西。13名住院医生(8/9 PGY1, 5/9 PGY2)表示,这次经历使他们更适应新的测试过程,但他们需要更多的练习,而只有两名住院医生(都是PGY2)回应说他们对这个过程非常满意。讨论:这个口头委员会案例的目的有两个:给住院医生提供ABEM认证考试的新CDM案例格式的经验,并加强肺栓塞的检查和管理。这个模拟是一个有效的教育工具,让住院医师熟悉ABEM认证考试中的CDM案例部分。只有少数(6/18,33%)的居民在发病前熟悉新的检测格式。这次会议是第一次使用清洁发展机制案例的模拟口头会议。事后调查结果显示,72%的居民(13/18)表示,他们的经历使他们更适应新的测试方法,但他们需要更多的实践,而只有两名居民(11%)表示他们对这个过程非常满意。这对审查员来说也是一个学习新的CDM案例格式的机会。评估表格使用了“是/否”的二分格式,这可能会导致过度的提示,从而抬高得分。这可能不能准确反映认证考试的经验。作为回应,脚本中添加了关于提示程度和案例时间的更具体的标准。这种形式的重复测试应该有助于住院医师和教育工作者准备ABEM认证考试。肺栓塞的初步评估是大多数住院医生都能接受的一个话题。住院医生在测试中得分很高,这表明他们对胸痛的检查和肺栓塞的常规管理有所了解。他们对高敏度、不稳定表现的处理不太熟悉。这个案例没有在医学生身上进行测试,但我们预计这将是一个适当的学习经验,对于急诊医学轮转的医学生来说,不需要修改。本案例旨在向居民介绍清洁发展机制案例格式。新的口头考试的培训材料有限,我们认为这个模拟案例对于住院医生来说是有价值的,通过一个舒适的主题和“低压力”的环境来熟悉新的ABEM认证考试形式。主题:临床决策病例,肺栓塞,呼吸短促,呼吸困难。
{"title":"Clinical Decision-Making Case: Pulmonary Embolism.","authors":"James H Lee, Linda Herman","doi":"10.21980/J8.52339","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.52339","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;Emergency medicine residents and medical students on emergency medicine rotations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common diagnosis with an annual incidence of approximately one in 1000 persons.1,2,3 There is a wide variety of clinical presentations, ranging from the asymptomatic patient to shock and cardiac arrest. Most patients have chest pain and shortness of breath (SOB), but PE may also present with mild or nonspecific symptoms, such as dizziness, cough, wheezing, syncope and hemoptysis. These patients have risk for clinical decompensation.4,5 It is therefore critical to maintain a high level of suspicion because misdiagnosis is common. There are risks attributable to the diagnostic evaluation and treatment, including radiation exposure, contrast reactions and complications related to anticoagulant therapy. Work up requires an understanding of clinical pretest probability, diagnostic algorithms such as the modified Wells scoring system and the revised Geneva scoring system, the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC), and interpretation of D-dimer testing and diagnostic imaging.6,7 Management requires anticoagulation, but for the unstable patient may also require respiratory and hemodynamic support, systemic or catheter-directed thrombolysis, catheter or surgical embolectomy, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) if available. Understanding the diagnostic evaluation and management of pulmonary embolism is essential for the practicing emergency medicine physician.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of the clinical decision-making case, the learner will: 1) gain familiarity with clinical decision-making (CDM) case format to be used in the new American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) certification examination starting in 2026, 2) demonstrate the ability to obtain a focused history and physical examination and develop appropriate differential diagnoses for chest pain and dyspnea, 3) demonstrate understanding of clinical decisions rules to estimate the pre-test probability for pulmonary embolism and the application of rules to guide appropriate diagnostic testing, 4) recognize high clinical suspicion for pulmonary embolism and indication for empirical treatment, 5) recognize the unstable patient and provide appropriate hemodynamic and respiratory support, 6) understand indications for thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy in unstable pulmonary embolism, 7) demonstrate communication skills with patients and specialists across the health care spectrum, and 8) arrange appropriate disposition for the unstable patient with a pulmonary embolism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This session is based on the clinical decision-making (CDM) case format introduced by ABEM to be used in the oral certification examination starting in 2026.8 The materials were modeled after the samples provided in the instructional videos on the ABEM Qualifying Exam P","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE212-CE238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782602/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prioritization: Run This Board: Septic Shock, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Small Bowel Obstruction, and Penetrating Chest Trauma. 优先级:运行这个板:感染性休克,急性冠状动脉综合征,小肠梗阻,穿透性胸外伤。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.52355
Colleen Donovan, Nicole Novotny, Charles Lei, Alaa Aldalati, Andrew Melendez, Neil Wallace, Tiffany Moadel, Stephanie Stapleton, Shagun Berry
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>This case was specifically designed for senior emergency medicine (EM) resident physicians as a preparatory tool for the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Certifying Exam. However, it is applicable for EM residents at all levels of training.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>"A hallmark of emergency medicine is the ability to triage or prioritize care. This case will require the physician to evaluate and treat multiple patients while ensuring those who require immediate care receive it quickly. The physician may face the arrival of additional patients, the deterioration of existing patients, and realistic workflow interruptions during the case. A successful candidate will identify and stabilize high acuity patients."1 With the introduction of the new Certifying Exam by ABEM and the current lack of resources to practice prioritization in an assessment setting, resident physicians will need practice material in order to adequately prepare for their board examination.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this case learners will be able to: 1) Become familiar with format of a prioritization case (a component of the ABEM Certifying Exam), 2) Practice their ability to prioritize multiple 313 patients and provide stabilizing care, 3) Consider changes in status/patient acuity/new cases as presented, 4) Understand how to utilize team resources appropriately.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>This encounter is a structured, oral simulation case designed as a prioritization exercise for emergency medicine resident trainees. It follows an interview-based format in which an examiner presents evolving patient information in a time-limited scenario, and the examinee responds in real time with clinical reasoning, prioritization of care, and management decisions. The case mimics the structure of the Prioritization Case in the ABEM Certifying Exam, allowing the examinee to verbalize thought processes while receiving updated clinical data from the examiner. This format emphasizes critical thinking, triage under pressure, and the delegation of tasks within a simulated emergency department environment.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>We first alpha-tested the case with board-certified emergency medicine physicians, who evaluated both the facilitator and learner aspects of the simulation. Their feedback was used to refine the structure, flow, and clinical realism of the case. Following these edits, the revised case was implemented with emergency medicine residents across varying levels of training. This staged approach allowed us to ensure educational fidelity and enhance realism, while also confirming that the case structure aligned with ABEM exam standards and expectations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted multi-site alpha and beta testing of a novel ABEM-style prioritization case with a total of 18 emergency medicine residents (eight individual residents and two 5-pers
观众:本案例是专门为高级急诊医学(EM)住院医师设计的,作为美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)认证考试的准备工具。但是,它适用于所有级别培训的新兴市场住院医师。引言:“急诊医学的一个标志是能够分诊或优先考虑护理。这种情况需要医生评估和治疗多名患者,同时确保那些需要立即护理的人迅速得到治疗。医生可能会面临额外患者的到来,现有患者的恶化,以及实际的工作流程中断。一个成功的候选人将识别和稳定高敏度患者。“1随着ABEM引入新的认证考试,以及目前在评估环境中缺乏实践优先级的资源,住院医师将需要实践材料来充分准备他们的委员会考试。教育目标:在本案例结束时,学习者将能够:1)熟悉优先级案例的格式(ABEM认证考试的一个组成部分),2)练习他们优先处理多个313患者并提供稳定护理的能力,3)考虑状态/患者敏度/新病例的变化,4)了解如何适当地利用团队资源。教学方法:这是一个结构化的,口头模拟案例,设计为急诊医学住院实习医生的优先练习。它遵循基于访谈的格式,考官在有限的时间内呈现不断发展的患者信息,考生实时响应临床推理、护理优先级和管理决策。该案例模仿了ABEM认证考试中优先级案例的结构,允许考生在从审查员那里接收最新临床数据的同时,用语言表达思维过程。这种形式强调批判性思维,在压力下进行分类,以及在模拟急诊科环境中分配任务。研究方法:我们首先与委员会认证的急诊医学医生对案例进行了阿尔法测试,他们评估了模拟的促进者和学习者方面。他们的反馈被用来完善病例的结构、流程和临床真实性。在这些编辑之后,修订后的案例在不同培训水平的急诊医学住院医师中实施。这种分阶段的方法使我们能够确保教育的保真度和增强现实性,同时也确认了案例结构符合ABEM考试标准和期望。结果:我们对一个新型abem式优先排序案例进行了多站点alpha和beta测试,共有18名急诊医学住院医师(8名个人住院医师和2个5人PGY2小组)和3名辅导员。调查由两名主持人(模拟场景评估工具,SSET)和八名常驻参与者或团队(修改可用性调查)完成。辅导员对案例的评价很高,全球平均得分为87.5/100,学习者的整体质量很高(4.4/5),教育价值很高(4.9/5),但教学清晰度较低(3.6/5)。参与者主要是老年居民(62.5%为PGY-3, 25.0%为PGY-2, 12.5%为PGY-4)。定性评论强调了采用新案例格式的有用性,并强调需要对结构和规则作出更明确的解释。这些结果表明,案例在各个培训级别都得到了很好的接受,迭代的修订提高了清晰度和可用性。根据初步测试,总分为70-75%表示通过此案例。讨论:这种口头板式的优先级划分案例为学习者提供了练习基本但经常被忽视的技能的机会,包括快速优先级划分、任务切换和实时决策。案例形式强化了诸如急诊部门动态环境中的态势感知和资源管理等关键概念。在最初的实施过程中,参与者报告了强烈的参与度,并发现练习对准备ABEM认证考试特别有价值。许多人注意到,基于ABEM提供的示例视频,其结构和期望与实际优先级站的结构和期望非常接近。从教师的角度来看,标准化的形式促进了一致的交付和评估。为了最大限度地减少考官在高复杂性模拟过程中的认知负荷,我们开发了一个模块化工具包,其中包括结构化脚本、刺激幻灯片和自动计分表,部分模仿了ABEM的双考官方法。一套附录支持数字和纸质使用,允许跨教育设置的灵活性。 为了进一步支持形成性实践,我们创建了一个评分标准来指导考官的反馈和学习者的自我评估。然而,由于ABEM尚未发布其内部评分标准,因此该标准是非官方的,应谨慎解释。它仅用于教育用途,并不用于预测实际认证考试中的表现。主题:优先排序、分诊、稳定、授权、任务转换、阴道出血、儿科损伤、精神状态改变、感染性休克、急性冠状动脉综合征、头痛、腹痛、小肠梗阻、胸部穿透性创伤、尿路感染。
{"title":"Prioritization: Run This Board: Septic Shock, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Small Bowel Obstruction, and Penetrating Chest Trauma.","authors":"Colleen Donovan, Nicole Novotny, Charles Lei, Alaa Aldalati, Andrew Melendez, Neil Wallace, Tiffany Moadel, Stephanie Stapleton, Shagun Berry","doi":"10.21980/J8.52355","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.52355","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;This case was specifically designed for senior emergency medicine (EM) resident physicians as a preparatory tool for the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Certifying Exam. However, it is applicable for EM residents at all levels of training.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;\"A hallmark of emergency medicine is the ability to triage or prioritize care. This case will require the physician to evaluate and treat multiple patients while ensuring those who require immediate care receive it quickly. The physician may face the arrival of additional patients, the deterioration of existing patients, and realistic workflow interruptions during the case. A successful candidate will identify and stabilize high acuity patients.\"1 With the introduction of the new Certifying Exam by ABEM and the current lack of resources to practice prioritization in an assessment setting, resident physicians will need practice material in order to adequately prepare for their board examination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of this case learners will be able to: 1) Become familiar with format of a prioritization case (a component of the ABEM Certifying Exam), 2) Practice their ability to prioritize multiple 313 patients and provide stabilizing care, 3) Consider changes in status/patient acuity/new cases as presented, 4) Understand how to utilize team resources appropriately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This encounter is a structured, oral simulation case designed as a prioritization exercise for emergency medicine resident trainees. It follows an interview-based format in which an examiner presents evolving patient information in a time-limited scenario, and the examinee responds in real time with clinical reasoning, prioritization of care, and management decisions. The case mimics the structure of the Prioritization Case in the ABEM Certifying Exam, allowing the examinee to verbalize thought processes while receiving updated clinical data from the examiner. This format emphasizes critical thinking, triage under pressure, and the delegation of tasks within a simulated emergency department environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We first alpha-tested the case with board-certified emergency medicine physicians, who evaluated both the facilitator and learner aspects of the simulation. Their feedback was used to refine the structure, flow, and clinical realism of the case. Following these edits, the revised case was implemented with emergency medicine residents across varying levels of training. This staged approach allowed us to ensure educational fidelity and enhance realism, while also confirming that the case structure aligned with ABEM exam standards and expectations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted multi-site alpha and beta testing of a novel ABEM-style prioritization case with a total of 18 emergency medicine residents (eight individual residents and two 5-pers","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE312-CE369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782599/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prioritization: Intracranial Hemorrhage, Testicular Torsion, and Tricyclic Antidepressant Toxicity Presenting to a Community Emergency Department. 优先级:颅内出血,睾丸扭转,三环抗抑郁药物毒性呈现给社区急诊科。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.52346
Brian Milman, Marshall Howell, Joshua Ginsburg, Samuel Parnell
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>This case is designed for emergency medicine residents preparing for the American Board of Emergency Medicine Certifying Exam (ABEM). While we tested the case with third year emergency medicine residents, it could also be used with first- and second-year residents to develop complex decision-making and prioritization skills in a simulated environment.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency medicine requires physicians to rapidly prioritize care, stabilize critically ill patients, adapt to changing clinical circumstances, and delegate tasks and resources. Traditional oral board cases emphasize single-patient encounters rather than multitasking or task-switching. This prioritization case better aligns with the clinical workflow of a shift in the emergency department, including triage, teamwork, and flexibility. This case forces learners to make timely decisions with incomplete information, giving examiners insight into how the examinee performs in the clinical environment.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this case learners should: 1) Become familiar with the format of a prioritization case (a component of the ABEM Certifying Exam), 2) demonstrate their ability to prioritize multiple patients and provide stabilizing care, 3) consider changes in status/patient acuity/new cases as presented, 4) understand how to utilize team resources appropriately.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>A group of five emergency medicine faculty with experience in simulation and oral board case design created a 15-minute practice prioritization case. This case is based on information provided by ABEM on the prioritization case format from the ABEM Certifying Exam. Learners are presented with evolving patient scenarios via tracking boards and prompted to prioritize, stabilize, task switch, and delegate as they manage multiple patients. The case is intended to be administered with two examiners and one examinee at a time. We used a group debrief structure, but this case can also be debriefed with each individual learner.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>This case was tested on 18 third-year emergency medicine residents. Following the case, each resident completed an anonymous two-item evaluation. The first item, "This case increased my understanding of the certifying exam format," was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The second item, "How would you rate the overall quality of this case?" was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from "poor" to "excellent."</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen of eighteen (89%) examinees completed the post-case evaluation. All respondents (100%) "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the case improved their understanding of the ABEM Certifying Exam format. Overall case quality was rated 4.88/5, and all learners rated the case "very good" or "excellent."</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case was effective in simu
观众:本案例是为准备美国急诊医学认证考试(ABEM)的急诊医学住院医师设计的。虽然我们对急诊医学三年级的住院医生进行了测试,但它也可以用于一年级和二年级的住院医生,在模拟环境中培养复杂的决策和优先排序技能。简介:急诊医学要求医生迅速确定护理的优先顺序,稳定危重病人,适应不断变化的临床环境,并分配任务和资源。传统的口服药病例强调单个患者就诊,而不是多任务处理或任务切换。这个优先级案例更好地符合急诊科轮班的临床工作流程,包括分诊、团队合作和灵活性。这个案例迫使学习者在信息不完整的情况下做出及时的决定,让考官了解考生在临床环境中的表现。教育目标:在本案例结束时,学习者应该:1)熟悉优先级案例的格式(ABEM认证考试的一个组成部分),2)展示他们优先处理多个患者并提供稳定护理的能力,3)考虑状态/患者敏度/新病例的变化,4)了解如何适当地利用团队资源。教学方法:由五名具有模拟和口头板案例设计经验的急诊医学教师组成的小组创建了一个15分钟的实践优先案例。本案例基于ABEM提供的关于ABEM认证考试中优先级案例格式的信息。学习者通过跟踪板呈现不断变化的患者场景,并提示优先级,稳定,任务切换和委派,因为他们管理多个患者。该案件拟由两名审查员和一名考生同时管理。我们使用了小组汇报结构,但这个案例也可以对每个学习者进行汇报。研究方法:本病例以18名急诊医学三年级住院医师为研究对象。在这个案例之后,每个居民都完成了一个匿名的两项评估。第一项,“这个案例增加了我对认证考试形式的理解”,以5分的李克特量表从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”进行评分。第二项,“你如何评价这个案例的整体质量?”用李克特5分量表从“差”到“好”打分。结果:18名考生中有16名(89%)完成了病例后评估。所有受访者(100%)“同意”或“强烈同意”该案例提高了他们对ABEM认证考试形式的理解。整体案例质量评分为4.88/5,所有学习者都认为案例“非常好”或“优秀”。讨论:本案例有效地模拟了临床环境的竞争需求,同时也为学习者准备了新的考试形式。在小组汇报过程中,学员们意识到了节奏,需要稳定多名患者,并对呈现的新信息做出反应。这个案例极大地提高了住院医师对ABEM认证考试中将测试的优先案例类型的理解。它还为项目教师提供了一个受控的环境,以观察住院医生如何同时管理多名病人。主题:优先级,资源利用,分类和稳定,任务切换,认知负荷。
{"title":"Prioritization: Intracranial Hemorrhage, Testicular Torsion, and Tricyclic Antidepressant Toxicity Presenting to a Community Emergency Department.","authors":"Brian Milman, Marshall Howell, Joshua Ginsburg, Samuel Parnell","doi":"10.21980/J8.52346","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.52346","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;This case is designed for emergency medicine residents preparing for the American Board of Emergency Medicine Certifying Exam (ABEM). While we tested the case with third year emergency medicine residents, it could also be used with first- and second-year residents to develop complex decision-making and prioritization skills in a simulated environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Emergency medicine requires physicians to rapidly prioritize care, stabilize critically ill patients, adapt to changing clinical circumstances, and delegate tasks and resources. Traditional oral board cases emphasize single-patient encounters rather than multitasking or task-switching. This prioritization case better aligns with the clinical workflow of a shift in the emergency department, including triage, teamwork, and flexibility. This case forces learners to make timely decisions with incomplete information, giving examiners insight into how the examinee performs in the clinical environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of this case learners should: 1) Become familiar with the format of a prioritization case (a component of the ABEM Certifying Exam), 2) demonstrate their ability to prioritize multiple patients and provide stabilizing care, 3) consider changes in status/patient acuity/new cases as presented, 4) understand how to utilize team resources appropriately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A group of five emergency medicine faculty with experience in simulation and oral board case design created a 15-minute practice prioritization case. This case is based on information provided by ABEM on the prioritization case format from the ABEM Certifying Exam. Learners are presented with evolving patient scenarios via tracking boards and prompted to prioritize, stabilize, task switch, and delegate as they manage multiple patients. The case is intended to be administered with two examiners and one examinee at a time. We used a group debrief structure, but this case can also be debriefed with each individual learner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This case was tested on 18 third-year emergency medicine residents. Following the case, each resident completed an anonymous two-item evaluation. The first item, \"This case increased my understanding of the certifying exam format,\" was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from \"strongly disagree\" to \"strongly agree.\" The second item, \"How would you rate the overall quality of this case?\" was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from \"poor\" to \"excellent.\"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Sixteen of eighteen (89%) examinees completed the post-case evaluation. All respondents (100%) \"agreed\" or \"strongly agreed\" that the case improved their understanding of the ABEM Certifying Exam format. Overall case quality was rated 4.88/5, and all learners rated the case \"very good\" or \"excellent.\"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion: &lt;/strong&gt;This case was effective in simu","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE370-CE396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782595/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Procedural case: Ultrasound Case: Syncope in PE. 手术病例:超声病例:PE晕厥。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.52365
Neil Wallace, Andrew Melendez, Lars Beattie, Tina Chen, David Fernandez, Amrita Vempati, Kelly Roszczynialski, Stephanie Cohen, Stephanie Stapleton, Tiffany Moadel
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>This certifying exam practice ultrasound case is intended for emergency physicians (EP) in training.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool in the practice of Emergency Medicine (EM). EM physicians routinely use POCUS to expedite diagnostic evaluations, guide resuscitative efforts, enhance the safety and success of bedside procedures, and reassess critically ill patients in real-time. Furthermore, POCUS is listed in the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine from ABEM, including diagnostic, resuscitative, and procedural components.1 Training during residency, however, remains variable while POCUS continues to grow in importance.2 Incorporating structured, competency-based ultrasound education into EM training has the potential to standardize skill with image acquisition, enhance image interpretation, improve confidence with clinical integration, and ultimately lead to better patient care in the acute setting.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of the session, learners will be able to: 1) obtain and interpret the parasternal short-axis view of the heart to assess right ventricular size and function, 2) identify ultrasound findings suggestive of pulmonary embolism (PE) on cardiac short-axis view, including right ventricular dilation and septal bowing, 3) demonstrate appropriate probe selection and positioning to obtain optimal images of the heart and inferior vena cava (IVC), 4) evaluate the IVC using a subxiphoid or longitudinal view to assess distension and lack of respiratory collapse as supportive findings for elevated right heart pressures, 5) identify the anatomy of the neck vasculature, differentiate between the internal jugular vein and carotid artery, and select the appropriate puncture site, 6) describe ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization via the right internal jugular vein, using a sterile technique and real-time guidance.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>We developed a single-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) focused on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of a patient with syncope and suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).3 This format aligns with the American Board of Emergency Medicine's (ABEM) newly implemented certification examination, emphasizing real-time clinical reasoning and ultrasound skills in a simulated encounter.4 The OSCE features a simulated participant and a standardized examiner script mirroring the ABEM certification exam format to ensure realism and consistency.5,6 ABEM has not released specific scoring elements to our knowledge. As a result, a novel set of grading criteria was developed based on patient-centered care, image acquisition, and image interpretation. The case was co-developed by experts in emergency ultrasound and simulation-based education, and then peer-reviewed to ensure clinical accuracy, clarity, and educational valu
观众:本认证考试实践超声案例是为急诊医生(EP)培训。导读:即时超声(POCUS)已成为急诊医学(EM)实践中必不可少的工具。急诊医生通常使用POCUS来加快诊断评估,指导复苏工作,提高床边手术的安全性和成功率,并实时重新评估危重患者。此外,POCUS被列入ABEM的急诊医学临床实践模型,包括诊断、复苏和程序组件然而,住院医师期间的培训仍然不稳定,而POCUS的重要性继续增加将结构化的、基于能力的超声教育纳入EM培训有可能标准化图像采集技能,增强图像解释,提高临床整合的信心,并最终在急性环境中带来更好的患者护理。教育目标:在课程结束时,学习者将能够:1)获取并解释胸骨旁心脏短轴片,以评估右心室大小和功能;2)识别心脏短轴片上提示肺栓塞(PE)的超声表现,包括右心室扩张和室间隔弯曲;3)展示适当的探头选择和定位,以获得心脏和下腔静脉(IVC)的最佳图像。4)在右心压力升高时,使用刀下或纵视图评估下腔静脉,以评估扩张和呼吸衰竭的缺乏,作为支持结果;5)识别颈部血管的解剖结构,区分颈内静脉和颈动脉,并选择合适的穿刺部位;6)描述超声引导下经右颈内静脉中心静脉置管,使用无菌技术和实时引导。教育方法:我们开发了一种单站客观结构化临床检查(OSCE),重点是在评估晕厥和疑似肺栓塞(PE)患者时使用即时超声(POCUS)这种形式与美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)新实施的认证考试保持一致,强调在模拟遭遇中的实时临床推理和超声技能欧安组织的特点是模拟参与者和标准化考官脚本,反映ABEM认证考试格式,以确保真实性和一致性据我们所知,ABEM尚未发布具体的评分元素。因此,基于以患者为中心的护理、图像采集和图像解释,开发了一套新的分级标准。该病例由急诊超声和模拟教育专家共同开发,然后经过同行评审,以确保临床准确性、清晰度和教育价值。在实习期间,应试者将获得一个涉及晕厥患者的临床案例,并被要求展示基本的POCUS知识,包括图像采集、优化和解释,以评估PE的迹象,如右心室张力或下腔静脉过多审查员遵循结构化和标准化的脚本,使用清单评估参与者,包括去识别图像和病理剪辑。该工具评估图像采集,解释,并整合超声结果到临床决策。本欧安组织提供了一种标准化的方法来评估超声的诊断和程序能力。研究方法:此模拟案例可以用作独立场景或ABEM认证考试实践的一部分。为了获得最佳效果,住院医师应该单独完成,其中一些人被指派为辅导员,以更好地理解审查员的角色。案件大约持续10分钟,然后是10分钟的汇报。最佳设置包括审查员控制房间照明和超声波显示。该案例通过迭代过程在多个地点的新兴市场居民中进行了试验。反馈是通过匿名质量调查收集的,使用李克特量表和开放式评论。波士顿大学机构审查委员会审查了这个项目,并认为它是免税的。结果:两名住院医师和一名辅导员的初步测试表明,该案例清晰、易于使用,对备考有价值。2025年SAEM年会上的第二轮测试包括四名学习者和一名辅导员。反馈导致了案例的修订。调查得分一直是积极的,在清晰度、可用性和与ABEM考试准备相关方面得分很高。讨论:针对ABEM认证准备的晕厥超声病例的开发和实施凸显了POCUS日益融入急诊医学培训和评估。 晕厥是急诊科的高发主诉,也是常见的临床情况,在这种情况下可能会遇到PE等关键诊断在这种情况下,使用床边超声识别符合PE的右心劳损不仅反映了现实世界的临床实践,而且加强了诊断推理和图像解释技能,这对当代急诊医生来说是必不可少的学习者的好评强调了超声案例在备考中的价值,并支持在急诊医学培训项目中持续发展高质量的、委员会式的超声评估。主题:超声,心脏,下腔静脉,血管,肺栓塞。
{"title":"Procedural case: Ultrasound Case: Syncope in PE.","authors":"Neil Wallace, Andrew Melendez, Lars Beattie, Tina Chen, David Fernandez, Amrita Vempati, Kelly Roszczynialski, Stephanie Cohen, Stephanie Stapleton, Tiffany Moadel","doi":"10.21980/J8.52365","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.52365","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;This certifying exam practice ultrasound case is intended for emergency physicians (EP) in training.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool in the practice of Emergency Medicine (EM). EM physicians routinely use POCUS to expedite diagnostic evaluations, guide resuscitative efforts, enhance the safety and success of bedside procedures, and reassess critically ill patients in real-time. Furthermore, POCUS is listed in the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine from ABEM, including diagnostic, resuscitative, and procedural components.1 Training during residency, however, remains variable while POCUS continues to grow in importance.2 Incorporating structured, competency-based ultrasound education into EM training has the potential to standardize skill with image acquisition, enhance image interpretation, improve confidence with clinical integration, and ultimately lead to better patient care in the acute setting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of the session, learners will be able to: 1) obtain and interpret the parasternal short-axis view of the heart to assess right ventricular size and function, 2) identify ultrasound findings suggestive of pulmonary embolism (PE) on cardiac short-axis view, including right ventricular dilation and septal bowing, 3) demonstrate appropriate probe selection and positioning to obtain optimal images of the heart and inferior vena cava (IVC), 4) evaluate the IVC using a subxiphoid or longitudinal view to assess distension and lack of respiratory collapse as supportive findings for elevated right heart pressures, 5) identify the anatomy of the neck vasculature, differentiate between the internal jugular vein and carotid artery, and select the appropriate puncture site, 6) describe ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization via the right internal jugular vein, using a sterile technique and real-time guidance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We developed a single-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) focused on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of a patient with syncope and suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).3 This format aligns with the American Board of Emergency Medicine's (ABEM) newly implemented certification examination, emphasizing real-time clinical reasoning and ultrasound skills in a simulated encounter.4 The OSCE features a simulated participant and a standardized examiner script mirroring the ABEM certification exam format to ensure realism and consistency.5,6 ABEM has not released specific scoring elements to our knowledge. As a result, a novel set of grading criteria was developed based on patient-centered care, image acquisition, and image interpretation. The case was co-developed by experts in emergency ultrasound and simulation-based education, and then peer-reviewed to ensure clinical accuracy, clarity, and educational valu","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE126-CE147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782594/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simulation-Based Preparation for the American Board of Emergency Medicine Certifying Exam: A Comprehensive Curriculum for Residents. 基于模拟的美国急诊医学委员会认证考试准备:住院医师综合课程。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.53814
Kimberly Sokol, Alaa Aldalati, Michelle Hughes, Stephanie Stapleton, Charles Lei
<p><strong>Audience and type of curriculum: </strong>This curriculum is designed for junior and senior emergency medicine (EM) residents who are preparing for the new American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Certifying Exam.</p><p><strong>Length of curriculum: </strong>This curriculum can be completed over the course of an EM residency program to prepare junior residents for the individual content areas encountered on the new Certifying Exam. Alternatively, it can be implemented during a single session to simulate the actual exam for senior residents.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With ABEM transitioning to a new format for its Certifying Exam, there is a critical need for targeted preparatory materials that reflect these changes.</p><p><strong>Educational goals: </strong>The goal of this curriculum is to equip residents with the knowledge and skills needed to succeed on the ABEM Certifying Exam. It includes a comprehensive set of case types expected to appear on the Certifying Exam, with a focus on assessing competencies not currently evaluated by the existing written Qualifying Exam and retiring Oral Exam. The curriculum is designed to be delivered to current residents in a single-day exam format to closely replicate the structure and experience of the new Certifying Exam.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>The educational strategy used in this curriculum consists of a set of eight simulation scenarios written in an Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) format. Each scenario targets a distinct area of the recently introduced ABEM Certifying Exam. These content areas include clinical decision-making, prioritization, reassessment, difficult conversations, managing conflict, ultrasound, procedural skills, and patient-centered communications. The OSCE structure intentionally reflects that of the ABEM Certifying Exam to enhance realism, ensure consistency, and maintain educational relevance.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>This eight-case simulation curriculum focuses on core EM competencies, including decision-making, communication, conflict resolution, prioritization, procedural skills, and ultrasound. Initially developed by experts in simulation and medical education, each case was subsequently refined through a structured peer review process. This process involved written evaluations by external reviewers followed by pilot testing across multiple EM residency programs and at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. Faculty facilitators and resident learners provided targeted feedback using the Simulation Scenario Evaluation Tool1 and modified usability surveys, assessing factors such as case realism, scenario flow, clarity of learning objectives, alignment of assessment criteria, and practical feasibility for implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pilot testing across multiple institutions and at a national academic meeting demonstrated the curriculum's strong educational value, c
受众和课程类型:本课程是为准备新的美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)认证考试的初级和高级急诊医学(EM)住院医师设计的。课程长度:该课程可以在EM住院医师计划的课程中完成,为初级住院医师准备新的认证考试中遇到的各个内容领域。或者,它可以在单个会话中实现,以模拟老年住院医生的实际考试。简介:随着ABEM过渡到一个新的格式为其认证考试,有一个关键的需要有针对性的准备材料,反映这些变化。教育目标:本课程的目标是为住院医师提供在ABEM认证考试中取得成功所需的知识和技能。它包括一套全面的案例类型,预计将出现在认证考试中,重点是评估目前不被现有的书面资格考试和即将退出的口头考试评估的能力。该课程旨在以一天的考试形式提供给现有居民,以密切复制新认证考试的结构和经验。教学方法:本课程中使用的教学策略包括以观察结构化临床检查(OSCE)格式编写的一组八个模拟场景。每个场景都针对最近引入的ABEM认证考试的不同领域。这些内容领域包括临床决策、优先排序、重新评估、困难对话、冲突管理、超声、程序技能和以患者为中心的沟通。欧安组织的结构有意反映了ABEM认证考试的结构,以增强现实性,确保一致性,并保持教育相关性。研究方法:这个8个案例的模拟课程侧重于EM的核心能力,包括决策,沟通,冲突解决,优先排序,程序技能和超声。最初由模拟和医学教育方面的专家开发,随后通过有组织的同行审查程序对每个案例进行了改进。这一过程包括由外部审稿人进行书面评估,然后在多个急诊住院医师项目和学术急诊医学学会年会上进行试点测试。教师辅导员和常驻学习者使用模拟场景评估工具1和修改的可用性调查提供有针对性的反馈,评估诸如案例真实性、场景流程、学习目标的清晰度、评估标准的一致性以及实施的实际可行性等因素。结果:在多个机构和全国学术会议上进行的试点测试表明,该课程具有强大的教育价值、清晰度和可用性。辅导员和住院医师的反馈都非常积极,强调了模拟场景的现实性,临床相关性和考试准备的有效性。讨论:这个综合的基于模拟的课程,旨在与ABEM认证考试保持一致,被证明是可行的,有效的,并且深受学习者和促进者的欢迎。其实施的关键见解强调了教师准备充分、适应现有资源的灵活性以及使用结构化汇报来支持学习的重要性。精心设计的模拟体验可以显著增强EM居民对高风险评估的准备。主题:认证考试,模拟,委员会认证,美国急诊医学委员会,住院医师。
{"title":"Simulation-Based Preparation for the American Board of Emergency Medicine Certifying Exam: A Comprehensive Curriculum for Residents.","authors":"Kimberly Sokol, Alaa Aldalati, Michelle Hughes, Stephanie Stapleton, Charles Lei","doi":"10.21980/J8.53814","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.53814","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience and type of curriculum: &lt;/strong&gt;This curriculum is designed for junior and senior emergency medicine (EM) residents who are preparing for the new American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Certifying Exam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Length of curriculum: &lt;/strong&gt;This curriculum can be completed over the course of an EM residency program to prepare junior residents for the individual content areas encountered on the new Certifying Exam. Alternatively, it can be implemented during a single session to simulate the actual exam for senior residents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;With ABEM transitioning to a new format for its Certifying Exam, there is a critical need for targeted preparatory materials that reflect these changes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational goals: &lt;/strong&gt;The goal of this curriculum is to equip residents with the knowledge and skills needed to succeed on the ABEM Certifying Exam. It includes a comprehensive set of case types expected to appear on the Certifying Exam, with a focus on assessing competencies not currently evaluated by the existing written Qualifying Exam and retiring Oral Exam. The curriculum is designed to be delivered to current residents in a single-day exam format to closely replicate the structure and experience of the new Certifying Exam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The educational strategy used in this curriculum consists of a set of eight simulation scenarios written in an Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) format. Each scenario targets a distinct area of the recently introduced ABEM Certifying Exam. These content areas include clinical decision-making, prioritization, reassessment, difficult conversations, managing conflict, ultrasound, procedural skills, and patient-centered communications. The OSCE structure intentionally reflects that of the ABEM Certifying Exam to enhance realism, ensure consistency, and maintain educational relevance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This eight-case simulation curriculum focuses on core EM competencies, including decision-making, communication, conflict resolution, prioritization, procedural skills, and ultrasound. Initially developed by experts in simulation and medical education, each case was subsequently refined through a structured peer review process. This process involved written evaluations by external reviewers followed by pilot testing across multiple EM residency programs and at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. Faculty facilitators and resident learners provided targeted feedback using the Simulation Scenario Evaluation Tool1 and modified usability surveys, assessing factors such as case realism, scenario flow, clarity of learning objectives, alignment of assessment criteria, and practical feasibility for implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Pilot testing across multiple institutions and at a national academic meeting demonstrated the curriculum's strong educational value, c","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"C1-C19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782606/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Decision-Making Case: Non-Accidental Trauma. 临床决策案例:非意外创伤。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.53233
H Michelle Greene, Anne P Runkle, Jennifer M Mitzman, Christopher E San Miguel, Krystin N Miller, Simiao Li-Sauerwine, Geremiha Emerson, Sorabh Khandelwal, Kelsey H Jordan, Jennifer Yee
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>This clinical decision-making (CDM) case is intended for emergency medicine (EM) residents of all levels.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-accidental trauma (NAT) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatrics. Every year in the United States, more than 656,000 children are found to be victims of NAT, causing over 1,800 deaths annually.1 Subtle abusive injuries are frequently missed in medical settings,1-3 and children may subsequently experience escalating or life-threatening abuse if interventions do not occur.2 Timely identification of abusive injuries in acute care settings is crucial to provide appropriate and potentially lifesaving care.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this clinical decision-making case, learners will be able to: 1) demonstrate familiarity with the CDM case format and case play, 2) describe important historical information to obtain when suspecting non-accidental trauma, 3) recognize potential physical exam findings in non-accidental trauma, 4) justify appropriate diagnostic studies based on clinical findings and current evidence on occult injury in suspected pediatric abuse, and 5) propose an appropriate disposition plan for patients with non-accidental trauma.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>This is a clinical decision-making boards case as outlined by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM). Each learner was paired with one instructor for the case, a scoring checklist by the instructor was used, and learners were given the opportunity to provide feedback after the case.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>Each CDM case session lasted approximately 20 minutes, with 15 minutes for the case and 5 minutes for debriefing and feedback. A 25-point critical action checklist was developed to evaluate each learner's performance. Learners then provided verbal feedback on the cases to the examiners at the conclusion of their assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine emergency medicine residents participated as learners for this clinical decision-making session, including 10 third-year residents, 12 second-year residents, and 17 first-year residents. Scoring checklists had a possible score of 25 points, with each point reflecting an equally weighted item. The average overall score was 16.85 of 25 possible points. Performance with respect to post-graduate year (PGY) is as follows: 18.0 for PGY-3s, 18.9 for PGY-2s, and 14.7 for PGY-1s. One resident had a perfect score of 25/25. There was no threshold passing score; therefore, no one resident "failed" this mock structured interview.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Performance of our learners varied and unexpectedly, our second-year residents outperformed our third-year residents. We believe this is due to our PGY-2 learners being responsible for the primary care of stroke patients in our department, which makes their identification of head bleed likely more recently
读者:本临床决策(CDM)案例适用于各级急诊医学(EM)住院医师。简介:非意外创伤(NAT)是儿科发病率和死亡率的主要原因。在美国,每年有超过656,000名儿童被发现是NAT的受害者,每年造成1,800多人死亡在医疗环境中经常遗漏细微的虐待伤害1-3,如果不采取干预措施,儿童随后可能遭受升级或危及生命的虐待在急性护理环境中及时识别虐待伤害对于提供适当和可能挽救生命的护理至关重要。教学目标:在本临床决策案例结束时,学习者将能够:1)表现出对CDM病例格式和病例玩法的熟悉,2)描述在怀疑非意外创伤时获得的重要历史信息,3)识别非意外创伤中潜在的体检结果,4)根据疑似儿童虐待的临床表现和隐性损伤的现有证据证明适当的诊断研究,5)为非意外创伤患者提出适当的处置计划。教育方法:这是一个由美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)概述的临床决策委员会案例。每个学习者与一名教师配对,使用教师的评分清单,学习者有机会在案例结束后提供反馈。研究方法:每个CDM案例会议持续约20分钟,其中15分钟用于案例,5分钟用于汇报和反馈。制定了一个25点的关键行动清单来评估每个学习者的表现。然后,学习者在评估结束时向考官提供关于案例的口头反馈。结果:39名急诊住院医师作为学习者参与了本次临床决策环节,其中三年级住院医师10名,二年级住院医师12名,一年级住院医师17名。计分清单可能有25分,每一分反映一个同等权重的项目。平均总分为16.85分(满分25分)。研究生一年(PGY)的表现如下:PGY-3为18.0,PGY-2为18.9,PGY-1为14.7。一位居民得到了25/25的满分。没有门槛及格分数;因此,没有一个居民在这次模拟结构化面试中“失败”。讨论:我们的学员的表现各不相同,出乎意料的是,我们第二年的住院医生表现得比第三年的住院医生要好。我们认为这是由于我们的PGY-2学习者负责我们部门中风患者的初级护理,这使得他们最近可能更容易识别头部出血。我们审查了异常项(住院医生的得分都很高,或者与其他项目相比得分较低),以确定这是否是一个合适的写作项目,如果是这样,我们将使用较低得分的项目作为学习机会,在未来的教学课程中强调。其中一项涉及询问患者的护理人员是谁,这可能归因于没有意识到这个问题与NAT的相关性,或者,更有可能的是,NAT在病例的早期方面不是最重要的鉴别诊断。来自学习者的口头反馈主要集中在扩大我们接受的鉴别诊断,以便将来迭代。我们认为这种情况适用于所有层次的学习,特别是当使用形成性方法(学习评估)时。鉴于学习者和教师提供的反馈,我们认为该病例对审查高风险或高急性儿科病理学具有很高的价值影响。主题:急诊医学、儿科学、非意外外伤、小儿颅脑外伤、脑出血。
{"title":"Clinical Decision-Making Case: Non-Accidental Trauma.","authors":"H Michelle Greene, Anne P Runkle, Jennifer M Mitzman, Christopher E San Miguel, Krystin N Miller, Simiao Li-Sauerwine, Geremiha Emerson, Sorabh Khandelwal, Kelsey H Jordan, Jennifer Yee","doi":"10.21980/J8.53233","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.53233","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;This clinical decision-making (CDM) case is intended for emergency medicine (EM) residents of all levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Non-accidental trauma (NAT) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatrics. Every year in the United States, more than 656,000 children are found to be victims of NAT, causing over 1,800 deaths annually.1 Subtle abusive injuries are frequently missed in medical settings,1-3 and children may subsequently experience escalating or life-threatening abuse if interventions do not occur.2 Timely identification of abusive injuries in acute care settings is crucial to provide appropriate and potentially lifesaving care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of this clinical decision-making case, learners will be able to: 1) demonstrate familiarity with the CDM case format and case play, 2) describe important historical information to obtain when suspecting non-accidental trauma, 3) recognize potential physical exam findings in non-accidental trauma, 4) justify appropriate diagnostic studies based on clinical findings and current evidence on occult injury in suspected pediatric abuse, and 5) propose an appropriate disposition plan for patients with non-accidental trauma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This is a clinical decision-making boards case as outlined by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM). Each learner was paired with one instructor for the case, a scoring checklist by the instructor was used, and learners were given the opportunity to provide feedback after the case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Each CDM case session lasted approximately 20 minutes, with 15 minutes for the case and 5 minutes for debriefing and feedback. A 25-point critical action checklist was developed to evaluate each learner's performance. Learners then provided verbal feedback on the cases to the examiners at the conclusion of their assessments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Thirty-nine emergency medicine residents participated as learners for this clinical decision-making session, including 10 third-year residents, 12 second-year residents, and 17 first-year residents. Scoring checklists had a possible score of 25 points, with each point reflecting an equally weighted item. The average overall score was 16.85 of 25 possible points. Performance with respect to post-graduate year (PGY) is as follows: 18.0 for PGY-3s, 18.9 for PGY-2s, and 14.7 for PGY-1s. One resident had a perfect score of 25/25. There was no threshold passing score; therefore, no one resident \"failed\" this mock structured interview.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion: &lt;/strong&gt;Performance of our learners varied and unexpectedly, our second-year residents outperformed our third-year residents. We believe this is due to our PGY-2 learners being responsible for the primary care of stroke patients in our department, which makes their identification of head bleed likely more recently","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE292-CE311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782589/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Centered Communication Case: Threatened Miscarriage. 以患者为中心的沟通案例:先兆流产。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.52360
Anita Rohra, Daniela Ortiz, Shagun Berry, Colleen Donovan, Nicole Novotny, Stephanie Cohen, Charles Lei, Alaa Aldalati, Stephanie Stapleton, David Fernandez
<p><strong>Audience: </strong>This communication case is intended for EM residents of all levels.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-centered communication is a necessary skill in the practice of emergency medicine. This style of communication is crucial for promoting high-quality healthcare by prioritizing patient needs, perspectives, and values. This patient-centered communication case centers on miscarriage, a diagnosis where patient-centered communication is requisite. Approximately one in six or 17.1% of patients with a final diagnosis of miscarriage, also known as early pregnancy loss, present initially to the emergency department.1 Advising a patient of the diagnosis of miscarriage requires excellent communication skills including facile rapport building, empathy, nonverbal communication, and explanation of management options.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this certifying exam practice case, learners will be able to: 1) establish a supportive and compassionate environment through verbal and non-verbal communication when engaging with a patient experiencing distress, anxiety, or grief related to potential pregnancy loss, 2) actively explore the patient's understanding, concerns, values, and goals related to their pregnancy and presenting symptoms, 3) recognize and normalize a range of emotional reactions, offering validation and support regardless of the patient's obstetric history or desired pregnancy outcomes, 4) clearly explain the diagnosis of a "threatened miscarriage," outlining its clinical implications, inherent uncertainty, and potential outcomes, 5) review the results of any imaging or lab studies succinctly and empathetically, while verifying the patient's understanding, 6) collaborate with the patient to develop a mutually agreeable care plan, including medical recommendations, appropriate follow-up, monitoring, and return precautions.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>This standardized patient case provides an opportunity to practice patient-centered communication and debrief on areas for improvement for the learner. The case was co-developed by experts in simulation-based education and emergency medicine resident leadership.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>Facilitators evaluated the standardized patient case via a survey for efficacy, while learners evaluated it via a survey from the learner perspective. This case was tested in a serial fashion with incremental improvements based on feedback at each step: initially, both learners and facilitators at the case writer's institution, then learners and facilitators at the annual SAEM meeting, and finally with both at an institution outside of the case writer's institution. Three unique learners and three unique facilitators tested the case throughout the entire process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case was reviewed favorably with minor recommendations noted, such as additional notes for the facilitator and stronger
听众:本交流案例适用于所有级别的新兴市场居民。以病人为中心的沟通是急诊医学实践中必要的技能。这种沟通方式通过优先考虑患者的需求、观点和价值观,对于促进高质量的医疗保健至关重要。这个以患者为中心的沟通案例集中在流产,诊断中以患者为中心的沟通是必要的。大约六分之一或17.1%的最终诊断为流产(也称为早孕流产)的患者最初到急诊室就诊告知患者流产诊断需要出色的沟通技巧,包括轻松建立关系、移情、非语言沟通和解释管理方案。教育目标:通过本认证考试实践案例,学习者将能够:1)通过语言和非语言交流,建立一个支持性和富有同情心的环境,当患者经历与潜在的流产有关的痛苦、焦虑或悲伤时,2)积极探索患者对其怀孕和表现症状的理解、担忧、价值观和目标,3)识别并规范一系列情绪反应。无论病人的产科病史或期望的妊娠结果如何,都要提供确认和支持,清楚地解释“先兆流产”的诊断。概述其临床意义、固有的不确定性和潜在的结果,5)简明扼要地回顾任何影像学或实验室研究的结果,同时验证患者的理解,6)与患者合作制定双方都同意的护理计划,包括医疗建议、适当的随访、监测和返回预防措施。教学方法:这个标准化的病人案例提供了一个机会来练习以病人为中心的交流,并向学习者汇报需要改进的地方。该案例由基于模拟的教育专家和急诊医学住院医师领导共同开发。研究方法:引导者对标准化的病例进行疗效调查评价,学习者从学习者的角度进行调查评价。本案例以一系列的方式进行测试,并根据每一步的反馈进行逐步改进:最初,在案例作者所在的机构中同时进行学习者和促进者的测试,然后在年度SAEM会议上进行学习者和促进者的测试,最后在案例作者所在机构以外的机构中进行。三个独特的学习者和三个独特的引导者在整个过程中测试了这个案例。结果:对案例进行了有利的审查,并提出了一些小建议,例如对调解人的额外说明,以及预期的目标和关键行动之间更强的一致性。这两项调查都要求提供人口统计信息,并对案件进行1-5分的评估,5分是最高的评分。学习者给这个案例打了4.5分,然后在迭代试验中打了4.8分。主持人对所有问题的评分都在4分(满分5分)以上。评论集中在澄清口头提示和汇报计划上。讨论:总的来说,这个标准化的患者交流病例得到了积极的接受,并被推荐用于准备ABEM认证考试。主题:以患者为中心的沟通,先兆流产,健康沟通。
{"title":"Patient-Centered Communication Case: Threatened Miscarriage.","authors":"Anita Rohra, Daniela Ortiz, Shagun Berry, Colleen Donovan, Nicole Novotny, Stephanie Cohen, Charles Lei, Alaa Aldalati, Stephanie Stapleton, David Fernandez","doi":"10.21980/J8.52360","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.52360","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audience: &lt;/strong&gt;This communication case is intended for EM residents of all levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Patient-centered communication is a necessary skill in the practice of emergency medicine. This style of communication is crucial for promoting high-quality healthcare by prioritizing patient needs, perspectives, and values. This patient-centered communication case centers on miscarriage, a diagnosis where patient-centered communication is requisite. Approximately one in six or 17.1% of patients with a final diagnosis of miscarriage, also known as early pregnancy loss, present initially to the emergency department.1 Advising a patient of the diagnosis of miscarriage requires excellent communication skills including facile rapport building, empathy, nonverbal communication, and explanation of management options.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;By the end of this certifying exam practice case, learners will be able to: 1) establish a supportive and compassionate environment through verbal and non-verbal communication when engaging with a patient experiencing distress, anxiety, or grief related to potential pregnancy loss, 2) actively explore the patient's understanding, concerns, values, and goals related to their pregnancy and presenting symptoms, 3) recognize and normalize a range of emotional reactions, offering validation and support regardless of the patient's obstetric history or desired pregnancy outcomes, 4) clearly explain the diagnosis of a \"threatened miscarriage,\" outlining its clinical implications, inherent uncertainty, and potential outcomes, 5) review the results of any imaging or lab studies succinctly and empathetically, while verifying the patient's understanding, 6) collaborate with the patient to develop a mutually agreeable care plan, including medical recommendations, appropriate follow-up, monitoring, and return precautions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Educational methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This standardized patient case provides an opportunity to practice patient-centered communication and debrief on areas for improvement for the learner. The case was co-developed by experts in simulation-based education and emergency medicine resident leadership.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Facilitators evaluated the standardized patient case via a survey for efficacy, while learners evaluated it via a survey from the learner perspective. This case was tested in a serial fashion with incremental improvements based on feedback at each step: initially, both learners and facilitators at the case writer's institution, then learners and facilitators at the annual SAEM meeting, and finally with both at an institution outside of the case writer's institution. Three unique learners and three unique facilitators tested the case throughout the entire process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The case was reviewed favorably with minor recommendations noted, such as additional notes for the facilitator and stronger","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE58-CE76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782581/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reassessment Case: Acute Pulmonary Edema in a Boarding Patient. 重新评估病例:住院病人急性肺水肿。
Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.21980/J8.52353
Tina Chen, David Fernandez, Amrita Vempati, Kelly Roszczynialski, Stephanie Cohen, Charles Lei, Hillary Moss, Tiffany Moadel, Stephanie Stapleton, Lars Beattie

Audience: The target audience for this communication case is senior residents and junior faculty preparing for the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Certifying Exam. Secondary audiences include junior emergency medicine (EM) residents.

Introduction: Rapid identification of clinical changes, reassessment of previous diagnoses, and appropriate adjustment of interventions are critical skills in EM. This case highlights the skills needed to recognize and manage a change in condition with acute pulmonary edema, a life-threatening condition that requires prompt intervention.

Educational objectives: By the end of the case, the learner should will be able to: 1) demonstrate competency with the new ABEM Certifying Exam Reassessment case format, 2) demonstrate the ability to evaluate new information and integrate it into an existing care plan, 3) recognize signs and symptoms of pulmonary edema, 4) review possible etiologies of acute respiratory distress and the evaluation/work up to differentiate and diagnose those causes, and 5) manage pulmonary edema including implementing afterload reduction, positive pressure ventilation, and diuresis.

Educational method: This is a standardized patient scenario, in alignment with the expected reassessment case format of the ABEM Certifying Exam. This educational modality is advantageous for assessing the learner's ability to acquire history and physical examination data in a clinical environment, as well as to communicate with a patient using clear, understandable, and appropriate language.

Research methods: This case was iteratively evaluated using facilitator and learner surveys at three sites: an academic EM residency program, the 2025 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, and a second academic EM residency program. Feedback at each site informed further refinements. A total of 11 senior resident learners and four facilitators tested the case, providing feedback on its quality and usefulness.

Results: Learners and facilitators found the case well-written and effective. All 11 learners felt that the case was helpful practice for the ABEM Certifying Examination. Additionally, all facilitators felt the case materials were easy to use and would use the case again in the future.

Discussion: The case was well-received by both learners and facilitators and appears to be a good preparatory tool for the Reassessment case format of the ABEM Certifying Exam.

Topics: Pulmonary edema, sign-out, reassessment, Certifying Exam.

受众:本交流案例的目标受众是准备美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)认证考试的老年住院医生和初级教师。次要受众包括初级急诊医师(EM)。简介:快速识别临床变化、重新评估既往诊断和适当调整干预措施是EM的关键技能。本病例强调了识别和管理急性肺水肿(一种危及生命的疾病,需要及时干预)病情变化所需的技能。教学目标:在案例结束时,学习者应该能够:1)证明具备新的ABEM认证考试重新评估案例格式的能力,2)证明评估新信息并将其整合到现有护理计划中的能力,3)识别肺水肿的体征和症状,4)回顾急性呼吸窘迫的可能病因并评估/工作以区分和诊断这些原因,5)管理肺水肿,包括实施后负荷减轻,正压通气和利尿。教育方法:这是一个标准化的患者场景,与ABEM认证考试的预期重新评估案例格式保持一致。这种教育方式有利于评估学习者在临床环境中获取病史和体检数据的能力,以及使用清晰、易懂和适当的语言与患者沟通的能力。研究方法:本案例通过在三个地点进行促进者和学习者调查进行迭代评估:一个学术EM住院医师计划,2025年学术急诊医学学会年会,以及第二个学术EM住院医师计划。每个站点的反馈通知了进一步的改进。共有11名资深常驻学习者和4名辅导员对案例进行了测试,并就其质量和有用性提供了反馈。结果:学习者和引导者认为案例写得好,效果好。11名学员均认为本案例对ABEM认证考试有帮助。此外,所有引导者都认为案例材料易于使用,并将在未来再次使用该案例。讨论:该案例受到学习者和导师的好评,似乎是ABEM认证考试重新评估案例格式的一个很好的准备工具。主题:肺水肿,签到,重新评估,认证考试。
{"title":"Reassessment Case: Acute Pulmonary Edema in a Boarding Patient.","authors":"Tina Chen, David Fernandez, Amrita Vempati, Kelly Roszczynialski, Stephanie Cohen, Charles Lei, Hillary Moss, Tiffany Moadel, Stephanie Stapleton, Lars Beattie","doi":"10.21980/J8.52353","DOIUrl":"10.21980/J8.52353","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>The target audience for this communication case is senior residents and junior faculty preparing for the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Certifying Exam. Secondary audiences include junior emergency medicine (EM) residents.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid identification of clinical changes, reassessment of previous diagnoses, and appropriate adjustment of interventions are critical skills in EM. This case highlights the skills needed to recognize and manage a change in condition with acute pulmonary edema, a life-threatening condition that requires prompt intervention.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of the case, the learner should will be able to: 1) demonstrate competency with the new ABEM Certifying Exam Reassessment case format, 2) demonstrate the ability to evaluate new information and integrate it into an existing care plan, 3) recognize signs and symptoms of pulmonary edema, 4) review possible etiologies of acute respiratory distress and the evaluation/work up to differentiate and diagnose those causes, and 5) manage pulmonary edema including implementing afterload reduction, positive pressure ventilation, and diuresis.</p><p><strong>Educational method: </strong>This is a standardized patient scenario, in alignment with the expected reassessment case format of the ABEM Certifying Exam. This educational modality is advantageous for assessing the learner's ability to acquire history and physical examination data in a clinical environment, as well as to communicate with a patient using clear, understandable, and appropriate language.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>This case was iteratively evaluated using facilitator and learner surveys at three sites: an academic EM residency program, the 2025 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, and a second academic EM residency program. Feedback at each site informed further refinements. A total of 11 senior resident learners and four facilitators tested the case, providing feedback on its quality and usefulness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Learners and facilitators found the case well-written and effective. All 11 learners felt that the case was helpful practice for the ABEM Certifying Examination. Additionally, all facilitators felt the case materials were easy to use and would use the case again in the future.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The case was well-received by both learners and facilitators and appears to be a good preparatory tool for the Reassessment case format of the ABEM Certifying Exam.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Pulmonary edema, sign-out, reassessment, Certifying Exam.</p>","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 5","pages":"CE77-CE105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782600/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1