Pub Date : 2025-09-24eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.25646/13418
Anne Starker, Dorothea Mößnang, Ronny Kuhnert
Background: The World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control recommends tobacco control measures. The implementation of these measures in Europe is assessed using the Tobacco Control Scale. The aim of this analysis is to examine smoking behaviour in European countries in the context of national measures to curb tobacco consumption.
Methods: In addition to analysing current tobacco consumption, the relationship between the 2019 Tobacco Control Scale results, including policy areas, and smoking prevalence in 29 European countries was examined based on data from the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3). This was visualised using scatter plots and analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficients.
Results: On average, 24.4 % of adults in Europe smoke, with substantial differences between countries. There are also some clear differences between the sexes, with a higher proportion of men than women smoking in all countries studied. A higher overall score on the Tobacco Control Scale is associated with a lower smoking prevalence among both women and men. Negative correlations are also evident between smoking prevalence and the policy areas of smoking cessation support and advertising bans.
Conclusions: Consistent implementation of tobacco control measures is associated with lower smoking prevalence in Europe. This highlights the importance of comprehensive tobacco control strategies to reduce tobacco consumption.
{"title":"Placing smoking prevalence in the context of tobacco control measures in Europe.","authors":"Anne Starker, Dorothea Mößnang, Ronny Kuhnert","doi":"10.25646/13418","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control recommends tobacco control measures. The implementation of these measures in Europe is assessed using the Tobacco Control Scale. The aim of this analysis is to examine smoking behaviour in European countries in the context of national measures to curb tobacco consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In addition to analysing current tobacco consumption, the relationship between the 2019 Tobacco Control Scale results, including policy areas, and smoking prevalence in 29 European countries was examined based on data from the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3). This was visualised using scatter plots and analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 24.4 % of adults in Europe smoke, with substantial differences between countries. There are also some clear differences between the sexes, with a higher proportion of men than women smoking in all countries studied. A higher overall score on the Tobacco Control Scale is associated with a lower smoking prevalence among both women and men. Negative correlations are also evident between smoking prevalence and the policy areas of smoking cessation support and advertising bans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent implementation of tobacco control measures is associated with lower smoking prevalence in Europe. This highlights the importance of comprehensive tobacco control strategies to reduce tobacco consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 3","pages":"e13418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145331069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.25646/13381
Jens Baumert, Lukas Reitzle, Ralph Brinks, Ronny Kuhnert, Christin Heidemann
Background: In order to assess the prevention and care needs for type 2 diabetes in the coming decades from a public health perspective, forecasts on the trends in prevalence and case numbers are essential.
Methods: The data are based on age-specific estimates of diagnosed diabetes prevalence from the survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2022, and on the proportion of type 2 diabetes derived from routine health insurance data. Using routine data on the incidence and excess mortality of diabetes, various scenarios for the future trends of type 2 diabetes are modelled using an illness-death model.
Results: Based on a type 2 diabetes prevalence of 8.6 % in 2022 (women: 8.2 %, men: 9.2 %), corresponding to a total of 6.05 million cases (women: 2.92 million, men 3.13 million), the prevalence is expected to rise to 16.1 % by 2050 (women: 14.8 %, men: 17.4 %), with the number of cases increasing to 11.01 million (women: 5.19 million, men: 5.82 million). Assuming a 2.0 % annual decline in incidence, the prevalence is expected to rise to only 12.2 % (8.39 million cases); with a simultaneous 2.0 % annual decline in excess mortality, the prevalence is expected to reach 13.0 % (8.94 million cases).
Conclusions: The prognosis is mainly influenced by changes in incidence. Primary preventive approaches to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes are therefore crucial to counteract an increase in the number of type 2 diabetes cases.
{"title":"Trends in prevalence and number of cases of diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Germany: Projections until 2050.","authors":"Jens Baumert, Lukas Reitzle, Ralph Brinks, Ronny Kuhnert, Christin Heidemann","doi":"10.25646/13381","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to assess the prevention and care needs for type 2 diabetes in the coming decades from a public health perspective, forecasts on the trends in prevalence and case numbers are essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data are based on age-specific estimates of diagnosed diabetes prevalence from the survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2022, and on the proportion of type 2 diabetes derived from routine health insurance data. Using routine data on the incidence and excess mortality of diabetes, various scenarios for the future trends of type 2 diabetes are modelled using an illness-death model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on a type 2 diabetes prevalence of 8.6 % in 2022 (women: 8.2 %, men: 9.2 %), corresponding to a total of 6.05 million cases (women: 2.92 million, men 3.13 million), the prevalence is expected to rise to 16.1 % by 2050 (women: 14.8 %, men: 17.4 %), with the number of cases increasing to 11.01 million (women: 5.19 million, men: 5.82 million). Assuming a 2.0 % annual decline in incidence, the prevalence is expected to rise to only 12.2 % (8.39 million cases); with a simultaneous 2.0 % annual decline in excess mortality, the prevalence is expected to reach 13.0 % (8.94 million cases).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prognosis is mainly influenced by changes in incidence. Primary preventive approaches to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes are therefore crucial to counteract an increase in the number of type 2 diabetes cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 3","pages":"e13381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145202236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.25646/13411
Veronika Reisig, Anne Starker, Marjolein Haftenberger, Marie-Hélène Manz, Klaus Möhlendick, Kristin Mühlenbruch, Annkathrin Haar, Angelina Taylor, Brigitte Borrmann
Background: The risks of climate change for human health are becoming increasingly apparent. The prevention indicator system of the German federal states (Länder in Deutschland), developed between 2018 and 2022, was therefore reviewed in relation to its relevance to climate change.
Methods: As a first step, a working group with members from different German federal states developed a model on the relationships between climate change and health in the context of prevention. Central aspects of this model were translated into a checklist based on guiding questions, which was used to conduct a systematic, standardised, and evidence-informed assessment of the climate relevance of the prevention indicator system of the German federal states.
Results: Climate change relevance was identified for a total of 49 out of 73 prevention indicators. Most frequently, climate relevance was found for indicators relating to particularly vulnerable groups to climate change-related health impacts (27 indicators), followed by 18 indicators addressing health consequences of climate change.
Conclusions: The assessment methodology that we developed proved suitable and can be applied to assess climate relevance in other health indicator systems. This prevention indicator system requires further development of climate aspects that have not yet been included, such as 'health-relevant climate change impacts', 'health costs', and indicators on vaccine-preventable diseases as climate adaptation measures.
{"title":"Climate Change and Prevention - Review of Prevention Indicators of the German Federal States in Relation to 'Climate Change and Health'.","authors":"Veronika Reisig, Anne Starker, Marjolein Haftenberger, Marie-Hélène Manz, Klaus Möhlendick, Kristin Mühlenbruch, Annkathrin Haar, Angelina Taylor, Brigitte Borrmann","doi":"10.25646/13411","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risks of climate change for human health are becoming increasingly apparent. The prevention indicator system of the German federal states (Länder in Deutschland), developed between 2018 and 2022, was therefore reviewed in relation to its relevance to climate change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a first step, a working group with members from different German federal states developed a model on the relationships between climate change and health in the context of prevention. Central aspects of this model were translated into a checklist based on guiding questions, which was used to conduct a systematic, standardised, and evidence-informed assessment of the climate relevance of the prevention indicator system of the German federal states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Climate change relevance was identified for a total of 49 out of 73 prevention indicators. Most frequently, climate relevance was found for indicators relating to particularly vulnerable groups to climate change-related health impacts (27 indicators), followed by 18 indicators addressing health consequences of climate change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The assessment methodology that we developed proved suitable and can be applied to assess climate relevance in other health indicator systems. This prevention indicator system requires further development of climate aspects that have not yet been included, such as 'health-relevant climate change impacts', 'health costs', and indicators on vaccine-preventable diseases as climate adaptation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 3","pages":"e13411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478464/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145202217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-03eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.25646/13382
Safiya Fatima Zaloum, Julia Callaghan, Amira Goepfrich, Joachim Dudenhausen, Lars Paulson, Lars Hellmeyer, Klaus Vetter, Martina Ziegert, Thorsten Braun, Josefine Theresia Koenigbauer
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defines maternal mortality as the death of a woman during pregnancy or up to 42 days after delivery. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) serves as an indicator of the quality of health care. In Germany, recording is based on the death certificate (ICD-10 code), with variations in documentation leading to underreporting. Studies indicate insufficient data in Berlin and queries in Germany.
Method: 2,316 death certificates of women (aged 15 - 50) from the Berlin Central Archive (2019 - 2022) were analysed to identify maternal deaths and the quality of the information provided was assessed. In addition, the recording of pregnancy status on death certificates was examined nationwide.
Results: Fourteen maternal deaths (excluding late cases according to the WHO) were identified. Only four cases were identifiable as maternal deaths solely on the basis of ICD-10 codes. The additional information 'Is or was the woman pregnant?' which is important for identification, was available in about a quarter of the death certificates reviewed. In 73.2 % of cases, the question 'Is or was the woman pregnant?' remained unanswered. A nationwide comparison of death certificates revealed considerable differences: only Bavaria and Bremen followed the WHO definition. Saxony-Anhalt does not record pregnancy status at all.
Conclusion: The recording of maternal mortality in Germany is incomplete. Death certificates are often deficient. Many federal states record periods outside the WHO definition (3 - 12 months after birth). A standardized national system for registering maternal deaths is required to improve data collection and enable better prevention.
{"title":"Limitations in the recording of maternal mortality in Germany: An analysis of statistical challenges.","authors":"Safiya Fatima Zaloum, Julia Callaghan, Amira Goepfrich, Joachim Dudenhausen, Lars Paulson, Lars Hellmeyer, Klaus Vetter, Martina Ziegert, Thorsten Braun, Josefine Theresia Koenigbauer","doi":"10.25646/13382","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) defines maternal mortality as the death of a woman during pregnancy or up to 42 days after delivery. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) serves as an indicator of the quality of health care. In Germany, recording is based on the death certificate (ICD-10 code), with variations in documentation leading to underreporting. Studies indicate insufficient data in Berlin and queries in Germany.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>2,316 death certificates of women (aged 15 - 50) from the Berlin Central Archive (2019 - 2022) were analysed to identify maternal deaths and the quality of the information provided was assessed. In addition, the recording of pregnancy status on death certificates was examined nationwide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen maternal deaths (excluding late cases according to the WHO) were identified. Only four cases were identifiable as maternal deaths solely on the basis of ICD-10 codes. The additional information 'Is or was the woman pregnant?' which is important for identification, was available in about a quarter of the death certificates reviewed. In 73.2 % of cases, the question 'Is or was the woman pregnant?' remained unanswered. A nationwide comparison of death certificates revealed considerable differences: only Bavaria and Bremen followed the WHO definition. Saxony-Anhalt does not record pregnancy status at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The recording of maternal mortality in Germany is incomplete. Death certificates are often deficient. Many federal states record periods outside the WHO definition (3 - 12 months after birth). A standardized national system for registering maternal deaths is required to improve data collection and enable better prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 3","pages":"e13382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-27eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.25646/13284
Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Daniel Kotz
Background: Waterpipe (WP) use poses not only a risk of nicotine dependence but also additional health hazards. This study examined trends in WP use in Germany, focusing on prevalence by age group and differences in initiation age.
Methods: We analysed data from 76,239 respondents (≥ 14 years) from the German Study on Tobacco Use (DEBRA); a series of bi-monthly national surveys using face-to-face interviews at home (2018 - 2024). Prevalence trends were modelled using binomial logistic regression models with restricted cubic splines.
Results: The prevalence of WP use decreased over time, to an estimated 0.9 % (95 % CI = 0.6 - 1.2) by mid-2024. This prevalence is made up of 0.1 % (95 % CI = 0.0 - 0.2) 14- to 17-year-olds, 0.3 % (95 % CI = 0.2 - 0.6) 18- to 24-year-olds, 0.3 % (95 % CI = 0.2. - 0.4) 25- to 39-year-olds, and 0.2 % (95 % CI = 0.1 - 0.3) people aged 40 years and older. WP use increased until 2020 up to 2.8 % (95 % CI = 2.3 - 3.4), remained stable for two years and then decreased, especially among people between 25 and 39 years of age. The proportion of 14- to 17-year-old users and users aged at least 40 years remained stable over the years at a low level. Median initiation age was 18 years (25th percentile: 16 years; 75th percentile: 22 years). A lower initiation age was associated with male gender and lower income.
Conclusions: WP use increased from 2018 - 2020, stabilised from 2020 - 2022, and then decreased until 2024. Median initiation age was 18, with males and people with lower income starting at a younger age. Targeted public health interventions, focusing on younger males and those with lower socioeconomic status, are needed to prevent early use.
背景:水烟(WP)的使用不仅有尼古丁依赖的风险,而且还有额外的健康危害。这项研究检查了德国使用WP的趋势,重点是年龄组的患病率和开始年龄的差异。方法:我们分析了来自德国烟草使用研究(DEBRA)的76,239名受访者(≥14岁)的数据;2018 - 2024年,采用在家面对面访谈进行的一系列双月全国调查。流行趋势采用限制三次样条的二项逻辑回归模型进行建模。结果:随着时间的推移,WP使用的患病率下降,到2024年中期估计为0.9% (95% CI = 0.6 - 1.2)。14- 17岁患病率为0.1% (95% CI = 0.0 - 0.2), 18- 24岁患病率为0.3% (95% CI = 0.2 - 0.6), 18- 24岁患病率为0.3% (95% CI = 0.2)。- 0.4) 25至39岁的人,0.2% (95% CI = 0.1 - 0.3) 40岁及以上的人。到2020年,WP的使用增加到2.8% (95% CI = 2.3 - 3.4),在两年内保持稳定,然后下降,特别是在25至39岁之间的人群中。14- 17岁用户和40岁以上用户的比例多年来保持稳定,处于较低水平。起始年龄中位数为18岁(第25百分位数:16岁;第75百分位数:22岁)。较低的起始年龄与男性性别和较低的收入有关。结论:从2018年到2020年,WP的使用增加,从2020年到2022年稳定,然后下降到2024年。起始年龄中位数为18岁,男性和收入较低的人起始年龄更小。需要有针对性的公共卫生干预措施,重点关注年轻男性和社会经济地位较低的男性,以防止早期使用。
{"title":"Waterpipe use in Germany (2018 - 2024): Prevalence and sociodemographic differences in age of initiation.","authors":"Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Daniel Kotz","doi":"10.25646/13284","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Waterpipe (WP) use poses not only a risk of nicotine dependence but also additional health hazards. This study examined trends in WP use in Germany, focusing on prevalence by age group and differences in initiation age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from 76,239 respondents (≥ 14 years) from the German Study on Tobacco Use (DEBRA); a series of bi-monthly national surveys using face-to-face interviews at home (2018 - 2024). Prevalence trends were modelled using binomial logistic regression models with restricted cubic splines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of WP use decreased over time, to an estimated 0.9 % (95 % CI = 0.6 - 1.2) by mid-2024. This prevalence is made up of 0.1 % (95 % CI = 0.0 - 0.2) 14- to 17-year-olds, 0.3 % (95 % CI = 0.2 - 0.6) 18- to 24-year-olds, 0.3 % (95 % CI = 0.2. - 0.4) 25- to 39-year-olds, and 0.2 % (95 % CI = 0.1 - 0.3) people aged 40 years and older. WP use increased until 2020 up to 2.8 % (95 % CI = 2.3 - 3.4), remained stable for two years and then decreased, especially among people between 25 and 39 years of age. The proportion of 14- to 17-year-old users and users aged at least 40 years remained stable over the years at a low level. Median initiation age was 18 years (25th percentile: 16 years; 75th percentile: 22 years). A lower initiation age was associated with male gender and lower income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WP use increased from 2018 - 2020, stabilised from 2020 - 2022, and then decreased until 2024. Median initiation age was 18, with males and people with lower income starting at a younger age. Targeted public health interventions, focusing on younger males and those with lower socioeconomic status, are needed to prevent early use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 3","pages":"e13284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-11eCollection Date: 2021-11-01DOI: 10.25646/13256
Elvira Mauz, Sophie Eicher, Diana Peitz, Stephan Junker, Heike Hölling, Julia Thom
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.25646/9537.2.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.25646/9537.2。]
{"title":"Corrigendum: Mental health of the adult population in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid Review.","authors":"Elvira Mauz, Sophie Eicher, Diana Peitz, Stephan Junker, Heike Hölling, Julia Thom","doi":"10.25646/13256","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.25646/9537.2.].</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"6 Suppl 7","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12599456/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145496263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-25eCollection Date: 2025-06-01DOI: 10.25646/13185
Miriam Blume, Elvira Mauz, Mira Tschorn, Kristin Manz, Anja Schienkiewitz, Jennifer Allen, Jens Hoebel, Petra Rattay
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, young people at risk of poverty were particularly affected by contact restrictions as well as by daycare centre and school closures. The aim here is to describe the health status of young people at risk of poverty in comparison to their peers from financially better-off families at the end of the pandemic.
Methods: The analyses are based on the data of 3- to 15-year-olds from the study German Children's Health Update (2022/2023). Prevalences stratified by income were determined for selected indicators of health, health-related behaviour and psychosocial stress and resources. A comparison was made between families at risk of poverty and families with medium and high incomes. Poisson regressions were adjusted for parents' level of education.
Results: Young people at risk of poverty are more likely to have poor health than their peers from financially better-off families. While the former are less likely to participate in organised sport in their leisure time, there are no differences in participation in voluntary sports activities at school according to family income.
Conclusions: Strategies to reduce health-related disadvantages for young people at risk of poverty must be implemented at the level of society as a whole and in local settings. Continuous monitoring of children's and adolescents' health can help to identify trends at an early stage.
{"title":"Poverty and the health of children and adolescents at the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results of the KIDA study.","authors":"Miriam Blume, Elvira Mauz, Mira Tschorn, Kristin Manz, Anja Schienkiewitz, Jennifer Allen, Jens Hoebel, Petra Rattay","doi":"10.25646/13185","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, young people at risk of poverty were particularly affected by contact restrictions as well as by daycare centre and school closures. The aim here is to describe the health status of young people at risk of poverty in comparison to their peers from financially better-off families at the end of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analyses are based on the data of 3- to 15-year-olds from the study German Children's Health Update (2022/2023). Prevalences stratified by income were determined for selected indicators of health, health-related behaviour and psychosocial stress and resources. A comparison was made between families at risk of poverty and families with medium and high incomes. Poisson regressions were adjusted for parents' level of education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Young people at risk of poverty are more likely to have poor health than their peers from financially better-off families. While the former are less likely to participate in organised sport in their leisure time, there are no differences in participation in voluntary sports activities at school according to family income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategies to reduce health-related disadvantages for young people at risk of poverty must be implemented at the level of society as a whole and in local settings. Continuous monitoring of children's and adolescents' health can help to identify trends at an early stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 2","pages":"e13185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235328/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144593089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in Germany. Comprehensive analyses of long-term trends in CHD mortality that also distinguish between acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-AMI-related chronic CHD are currently lacking.
Method: Age-specific and age-standardised CHD mortality rates for the period 1998 - 2023 were calculated based on data from the cause-of-death statistics of the Federal Statistical Office of Germany. Annual percentage changes (APC) and average annual percentage changes (AAPC) were estimated using joinpoint regression analysis.
Results: Between 1998 and 2023, the average annual change in age-standardised CHD mortality rates for women was -3.9 % ((-4.1) - (-3.7)) per year, compared with -3.2 % ((-3.3) - (-3.0)) for men. However, since the 2010s, the downward trend in CHD mortality has flattened, particularly among those aged 60 to 74 years. In the analysis by ICD subgroups, mortality rates for chronic CHD declined less sharply than for AMI over the entire period 1998 - 2023, especially among men.
Conclusions: The flattening of the CHD mortality trend, particularly among middle-aged adults over the last decade, and the smaller decline in chronic CHD mortality, especially among men, require further exploration in order to identify unmet needs at various levels of prevention for specific life stages. In addition, the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on CHD mortality trends should be further investigated.
{"title":"Temporal trends in mortality due to coronary heart disease in Germany from 1998 to 2023.","authors":"Henriette Steppuhn, Jens Baumert, Viktoria Rücker, Kai Günther, Annelene Wengler, Fabian Tetzlaff, Hannelore Neuhauser","doi":"10.25646/13178","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in Germany. Comprehensive analyses of long-term trends in CHD mortality that also distinguish between acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-AMI-related chronic CHD are currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Age-specific and age-standardised CHD mortality rates for the period 1998 - 2023 were calculated based on data from the cause-of-death statistics of the Federal Statistical Office of Germany. Annual percentage changes (APC) and average annual percentage changes (AAPC) were estimated using joinpoint regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1998 and 2023, the average annual change in age-standardised CHD mortality rates for women was -3.9 % ((-4.1) - (-3.7)) per year, compared with -3.2 % ((-3.3) - (-3.0)) for men. However, since the 2010s, the downward trend in CHD mortality has flattened, particularly among those aged 60 to 74 years. In the analysis by ICD subgroups, mortality rates for chronic CHD declined less sharply than for AMI over the entire period 1998 - 2023, especially among men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The flattening of the CHD mortality trend, particularly among middle-aged adults over the last decade, and the smaller decline in chronic CHD mortality, especially among men, require further exploration in order to identify unmet needs at various levels of prevention for specific life stages. In addition, the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on CHD mortality trends should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 2","pages":"e13178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144327987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-21eCollection Date: 2025-06-01DOI: 10.25646/13126
Roma Thamm, Yong Du, Laura Neuperdt, Catarina Schiborn, Birga Maier, Anne Starker, Hannelore Neuhauser, Matthias B Schulze, Christin Heidemann
Background: Knowledge of the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is important for its prevention.
Methods: Data from a non-clinical test for the absolute risk of having a heart attack or stroke for the first time in the next ten years is available from 3,271 35- to 69-year-old participants in the GEDA 2022 study without a diagnosis of heart attack or stroke. This risk was categorised as low (< 5 %), still low (≥ 5 % - < 7.5 %), increased (≥ 7.5 % - < 10 %) and high (≥ 10 %). In addition, the self-perceived CVD risk was asked as almost no, low, moderate and high risk.
Results: According to the CVD test, 73.5 % of adults were at low risk, 7.8 % were still at low risk, 6.0 % were at increased risk and 12.8 % were at high risk. In contrast, 28.7 % perceived themselves to be at almost no risk, 45.3 % at low risk, 20.4 % at moderate risk and 5.6 % at high risk of CVD. The higher the test-based risk, the lower the proportion of those who perceived themselves as having almost no or only a low risk. Nevertheless, half of the people with an increased to high risk according to the test result perceived themselves to be at almost no or only a low risk. The underestimation of risk was associated with lower education, better mental health and physical activity in both sexes.
Conclusions: People who underestimate their risk of CVD despite an unfavourable risk factor profile are a key target group for cardiovascular prevention.
{"title":"Risk of cardiovascular disease in Germany: results from GEDA 2022.","authors":"Roma Thamm, Yong Du, Laura Neuperdt, Catarina Schiborn, Birga Maier, Anne Starker, Hannelore Neuhauser, Matthias B Schulze, Christin Heidemann","doi":"10.25646/13126","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is important for its prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a non-clinical test for the absolute risk of having a heart attack or stroke for the first time in the next ten years is available from 3,271 35- to 69-year-old participants in the GEDA 2022 study without a diagnosis of heart attack or stroke. This risk was categorised as <i>low</i> (< 5 %), <i>still low</i> (≥ 5 % - < 7.5 %), <i>increased</i> (≥ 7.5 % - < 10 %) and <i>high</i> (≥ 10 %). In addition, the self-perceived CVD risk was asked as <i>almost no, low, moderate</i> and <i>high risk.</i></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the CVD test, 73.5 % of adults were at low risk, 7.8 % were still at low risk, 6.0 % were at increased risk and 12.8 % were at high risk. In contrast, 28.7 % perceived themselves to be at almost no risk, 45.3 % at low risk, 20.4 % at moderate risk and 5.6 % at high risk of CVD. The higher the test-based risk, the lower the proportion of those who perceived themselves as having almost no or only a low risk. Nevertheless, half of the people with an increased to high risk according to the test result perceived themselves to be at almost no or only a low risk. The underestimation of risk was associated with lower education, better mental health and physical activity in both sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People who underestimate their risk of CVD despite an unfavourable risk factor profile are a key target group for cardiovascular prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 2","pages":"e13126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138951/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144236112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-31eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.25646/13079
Alexander Rommel, Beate Gaertner, Hannelore Neuhauser, Dinara Yessimova, Helmut Schröder, Gabriela Brückner, Katrin Schüssel, Michael Porst
Background: As part of the German Burden of Disease Study, population-based prevalences of important diseases are estimated. This allows regional patterns and temporal trends to be identified.
Methods: The prevalence of dementia in the population was estimated cross-sectionally for the years 2017 to 2022 at the level of the Spatial Planning Regions using routine data of persons insured in the statutory health insurance AOK, adjusted for age, sex and morbidity (administrative prevalence).
Results: In 2022, the prevalence of dementia in Germany was 2.8% of the population aged 40 and over. In women the prevalence was 3.3 %, in men 2.4 %. The prevalence of dementia rises sharply with age. For example, the prevalence among people aged 65 and over was 6.9 %. A slight downward trend was observed between 2017 and 2022. The age-standardised regional distribution shows a clear pattern of higher prevalence in eastern Germany and the eastern part of Bavaria.
Conclusions: Measured by administrative prevalence, the public health significance of dementia remains largely stable. However, demographic change is expected to increase the number of people affected by dementia. Prevention of modifiable risk factors is therefore essential, especially in middle age.
{"title":"Dementia - Prevalence, trends and regional patterns in Germany. An analysis based on routine data from the statutory health insurance.","authors":"Alexander Rommel, Beate Gaertner, Hannelore Neuhauser, Dinara Yessimova, Helmut Schröder, Gabriela Brückner, Katrin Schüssel, Michael Porst","doi":"10.25646/13079","DOIUrl":"10.25646/13079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of the German Burden of Disease Study, population-based prevalences of important diseases are estimated. This allows regional patterns and temporal trends to be identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prevalence of dementia in the population was estimated cross-sectionally for the years 2017 to 2022 at the level of the Spatial Planning Regions using routine data of persons insured in the statutory health insurance AOK, adjusted for age, sex and morbidity (administrative prevalence).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, the prevalence of dementia in Germany was 2.8% of the population aged 40 and over. In women the prevalence was 3.3 %, in men 2.4 %. The prevalence of dementia rises sharply with age. For example, the prevalence among people aged 65 and over was 6.9 %. A slight downward trend was observed between 2017 and 2022. The age-standardised regional distribution shows a clear pattern of higher prevalence in eastern Germany and the eastern part of Bavaria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measured by administrative prevalence, the public health significance of dementia remains largely stable. However, demographic change is expected to increase the number of people affected by dementia. Prevention of modifiable risk factors is therefore essential, especially in middle age.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"10 1","pages":"e13079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969280/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143797059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}