Pub Date : 2024-09-18eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.25646/12303
Lena Hasemann, Katharina Weinert, Jana Diekmannshemke, Robert Schlack, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Anne Kaman, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Marcel Romanos, Thomas Jans, Peter Heuschmann, Cordula Riederer, Julian Witte
Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with increased costs for the family, the health care system and the society. Previous cost-of-illness studies in Germany usually focused on prevalent ADHD. This study addressed the research gap on health care resource utilisation and costs of children and adolescents with incident ADHD diagnosis using nationwide claims data from the statutory health insurance DAK-Gesundheit.
Methods: A matched-control design (propensity score matching, 1:3 ratio) was used to examine the health care costs of incident ADHD patients compared with a non-ADHD control group, considering an observation period of four quarters. Besides bivariate statistics, multivariate analyses of total costs were used to consider relevant covariates.
Results: Total health care costs for children and adolescents with ADHD in the first year after diagnosis exceeded those of the control group by € 1,505.3. According to the multivariate analysis, the group with incident ADHD had significantly higher (2.86-fold) health care costs when compared with non-ADHD peers. Sensitivity analyses proved these findings. In addition, the analyses identified children's age and comorbidity index to be significantly associated with increased costs.
Conclusions: ADHD in children and adolescents is associated with a significant economic burden. The results emphasise the need for social awareness, prevention, appropriate treatment and research efforts.
{"title":"Health care costs of incident ADHD in children and adolescents in Germany - A claims data analysis within the framework of the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.","authors":"Lena Hasemann, Katharina Weinert, Jana Diekmannshemke, Robert Schlack, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Anne Kaman, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Marcel Romanos, Thomas Jans, Peter Heuschmann, Cordula Riederer, Julian Witte","doi":"10.25646/12303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/12303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with increased costs for the family, the health care system and the society. Previous cost-of-illness studies in Germany usually focused on prevalent ADHD. This study addressed the research gap on health care resource utilisation and costs of children and adolescents with incident ADHD diagnosis using nationwide claims data from the statutory health insurance DAK-Gesundheit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A matched-control design (propensity score matching, 1:3 ratio) was used to examine the health care costs of incident ADHD patients compared with a non-ADHD control group, considering an observation period of four quarters. Besides bivariate statistics, multivariate analyses of total costs were used to consider relevant covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total health care costs for children and adolescents with ADHD in the first year after diagnosis exceeded those of the control group by € 1,505.3. According to the multivariate analysis, the group with incident ADHD had significantly higher (2.86-fold) health care costs when compared with non-ADHD peers. Sensitivity analyses proved these findings. In addition, the analyses identified children's age and comorbidity index to be significantly associated with increased costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADHD in children and adolescents is associated with a significant economic burden. The results emphasise the need for social awareness, prevention, appropriate treatment and research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 3","pages":"e12303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459215/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.25646/12536
Sophia Weyrich, Vanessa Scholz, Leila Hetzke, Sanna Ulsamer, Chantal Wallau, Diana Mager, Julia Geißler, Marcel Romanos, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Robert Schlack, Anne Kaman, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Julian Witte, Anna Grau, Anna Horn, Peter Heuschmann, Cordula Riederer, Thomas Jans
Background: The study examines the psychometric properties of the ADHD section of the semi-structured diagnostic interview ILF-EXTERNAL, which was conducted online via video chat.
Methods: As part of the INTEGRATE-ADHD research project, 202 children and adolescents (age M = 12.87 years, SD = 3.04, 28.2 % female) with an administrative diagnosis of ADHD registered with their health insurance company were clinically assessed for the presence of ADHD according to the German ADHD S3 guideline. Using the ILF-EXTERNAL, one parent and, from the age of eight, also the children themselves were interviewed. A proxy rating by a parent was made using the German FBB-ADHS rating scale. In a subsample (n = 65), an independent blind interviewer rated the videorecordings of the ILF-EXTERNAL parent interview to determine the interrater reliability of the ILF-EXTERNAL.
Results: All ADHD symptom scales of the ILF-EXTERNAL showed good to excellent internal consistency (α = 0.89 to 0.93). Interrater reliability was high for both categorical and dimensional analyses (κ = 0.78 and κ = 0.81; ICC(1,1) = 0.97 and 0.98). High correlations of the ILF-EXTERNAL parent interview with the FBB-ADHS (r = 0.79 to r = 0.85) and with the ILF-EXTERNAL child interview (r = 0.60 to r = 0.71) demonstrated convergent validity.
Conclusions: Sound psychometric properties of the ILF-EXTERNAL were also confirmed for its use in an online setting. High interrater reliabilities demonstrate the quality of the ADHD diagnostics carried out in the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Interview for Externalizing Disorders (ILF-EXTERNAL) in an online setting - Results from the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.","authors":"Sophia Weyrich, Vanessa Scholz, Leila Hetzke, Sanna Ulsamer, Chantal Wallau, Diana Mager, Julia Geißler, Marcel Romanos, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Robert Schlack, Anne Kaman, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Julian Witte, Anna Grau, Anna Horn, Peter Heuschmann, Cordula Riederer, Thomas Jans","doi":"10.25646/12536","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/12536","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study examines the psychometric properties of the ADHD section of the semi-structured diagnostic interview ILF-EXTERNAL, which was conducted online via video chat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the INTEGRATE-ADHD research project, 202 children and adolescents (age <i>M</i> = 12.87 years, <i>SD</i> = 3.04, 28.2 % female) with an administrative diagnosis of ADHD registered with their health insurance company were clinically assessed for the presence of ADHD according to the German ADHD S3 guideline. Using the ILF-EXTERNAL, one parent and, from the age of eight, also the children themselves were interviewed. A proxy rating by a parent was made using the German FBB-ADHS rating scale. In a subsample (<i>n</i> = 65), an independent blind interviewer rated the videorecordings of the ILF-EXTERNAL parent interview to determine the interrater reliability of the ILF-EXTERNAL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All ADHD symptom scales of the ILF-EXTERNAL showed good to excellent internal consistency (α = 0.89 to 0.93). Interrater reliability was high for both categorical and dimensional analyses (κ = 0.78 and κ = 0.81; ICC(1,1) = 0.97 and 0.98). High correlations of the ILF-EXTERNAL parent interview with the FBB-ADHS (<i>r</i> = 0.79 to <i>r</i> = 0.85) and with the ILF-EXTERNAL child interview (<i>r</i> = 0.60 to <i>r</i> = 0.71) demonstrated convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sound psychometric properties of the ILF-EXTERNAL were also confirmed for its use in an online setting. High interrater reliabilities demonstrate the quality of the ADHD diagnostics carried out in the consortium project INTEGRATE-ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 3","pages":"e12536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459213/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.25646/12675
Robert Schlack, Marcel Romanos
{"title":"A societal challenge with high public health relevance: ADHD in children and adolescents in Germany.","authors":"Robert Schlack, Marcel Romanos","doi":"10.25646/12675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/12675","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 3","pages":"e12675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459212/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12159
Maike Buchmann, Carmen Koschollek, Yong Du, Elvira Mauz, Laura Krause, Laura Neuperdt, Oktay Tuncer, Jens Baumert, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Christin Heidemann
Background: Migration-related factors, such as language barriers, can be relevant to the risk, healthcare and complications of type 2 diabetes in people with a history of migration. Diabetes-related data from people with selected citizenships were analysed on the basis of the nationwide survey German Health Update: Fokus (GEDA Fokus).
Methods: The diabetes risk of persons without diabetes (n = 4,698, 18 - 79 years), key figures on healthcare and secondary diseases of persons with type 2 diabetes (n = 326, 45 - 79 years) and on concomitant diseases (n = 326 with type 2 diabetes compared to n = 2,018 without diabetes, 45 - 79 years) were stratified according to sociodemographic and migration-related characteristics.
Results: Better German language proficiency is associated with a lower risk of diabetes. Diabetes-related organ complications are observed more frequently in persons who report experiences of discrimination in the health or care sector. Both persons with and without diabetes are more likely to have depressive symptoms when they reported experiences of discrimination. A stronger sense of belonging to the society in Germany is associated with reporting depressive symptoms less often in people without diabetes, but not in people with type 2 diabetes.
Conclusions: The differences according to migration-related characteristics indicate a need for improvement in the prevention and care of type 2 diabetes. Migration-sensitive indicators should be integrated into the surveillance of diabetes.
{"title":"Type 2 diabetes among people with selected citizenships in Germany: risk, healthcare, complications.","authors":"Maike Buchmann, Carmen Koschollek, Yong Du, Elvira Mauz, Laura Krause, Laura Neuperdt, Oktay Tuncer, Jens Baumert, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Christin Heidemann","doi":"10.25646/12159","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migration-related factors, such as language barriers, can be relevant to the risk, healthcare and complications of type 2 diabetes in people with a history of migration. Diabetes-related data from people with selected citizenships were analysed on the basis of the nationwide survey German Health Update: Fokus (GEDA Fokus).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The diabetes risk of persons without diabetes (n = 4,698, 18 - 79 years), key figures on healthcare and secondary diseases of persons with type 2 diabetes (n = 326, 45 - 79 years) and on concomitant diseases (n = 326 with type 2 diabetes compared to n = 2,018 without diabetes, 45 - 79 years) were stratified according to sociodemographic and migration-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Better German language proficiency is associated with a lower risk of diabetes. Diabetes-related organ complications are observed more frequently in persons who report experiences of discrimination in the health or care sector. Both persons with and without diabetes are more likely to have depressive symptoms when they reported experiences of discrimination. A stronger sense of belonging to the society in Germany is associated with reporting depressive symptoms less often in people without diabetes, but not in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differences according to migration-related characteristics indicate a need for improvement in the prevention and care of type 2 diabetes. Migration-sensitive indicators should be integrated into the surveillance of diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12199
Christa Scheidt-Nave, Christin Heidemann, Lukas Reitzle, Maike Buchmann, Thomas Ziese, Andrea Icks
{"title":"Diabetes surveillance - Laying the groundwork for non-communicable disease surveillance in Germany.","authors":"Christa Scheidt-Nave, Christin Heidemann, Lukas Reitzle, Maike Buchmann, Thomas Ziese, Andrea Icks","doi":"10.25646/12199","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12199","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12201
Thomas Ziese, Anke-Christine Saß
{"title":"Journal of Health Monitoring - what's new in 2024?","authors":"Thomas Ziese, Anke-Christine Saß","doi":"10.25646/12201","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12201","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12128
Christin Heidemann, Yong Du, Elvira Mauz, Lena Walther, Diana Peitz, Anja Müller, Maike Buchmann, Jennifer Allen, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Jens Baumert
Background: The nationwide study German Health Update (GEDA) 2021/2022-Diabetes was conducted to assess the current healthcare and health situation of adults with diabetes in Germany.
Methods: GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes comprises a sample of adults with diagnosed diabetes from the general population. The analysis focuses on adults aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes (N = 1,448) and provides selected indicators on diabetes care as well as mental, social and general health.
Results: 87.5 % of participants aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes are treated with blood glucose-lowering medication. 36.5 % receive insulin alone or in combination with other antidiabetics; 0.7 % use an insulin pump. Almost 96 % had an HbA1c measurement in the last year and about two thirds each report annual foot and eye examinations, participation in a diabetes self-management education programme and self-monitoring of their feet and of blood glucose (12.0 % with continuous glucose monitoring). On average, the quality of diabetes care is perceived as moderate. 23.8 % rate their mental health as excellent/very good. More than a tenth each have anxiety or depressive symptoms and feelings of loneliness. Half rate their general health as very good/good.
Conclusions: There is a potential for improvement in the quality of diabetes care and the mental and physical health of adults with type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.","authors":"Christin Heidemann, Yong Du, Elvira Mauz, Lena Walther, Diana Peitz, Anja Müller, Maike Buchmann, Jennifer Allen, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Jens Baumert","doi":"10.25646/12128","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nationwide study German Health Update (GEDA) 2021/2022-Diabetes was conducted to assess the current healthcare and health situation of adults with diabetes in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes comprises a sample of adults with diagnosed diabetes from the general population. The analysis focuses on adults aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes (N = 1,448) and provides selected indicators on diabetes care as well as mental, social and general health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>87.5 % of participants aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes are treated with blood glucose-lowering medication. 36.5 % receive insulin alone or in combination with other antidiabetics; 0.7 % use an insulin pump. Almost 96 % had an HbA1c measurement in the last year and about two thirds each report annual foot and eye examinations, participation in a diabetes self-management education programme and self-monitoring of their feet and of blood glucose (12.0 % with continuous glucose monitoring). On average, the quality of diabetes care is perceived as moderate. 23.8 % rate their mental health as excellent/very good. More than a tenth each have anxiety or depressive symptoms and feelings of loneliness. Half rate their general health as very good/good.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a potential for improvement in the quality of diabetes care and the mental and physical health of adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12100
Michael Bosnjak, Stefan Dahm, Ronny Kuhnert, Dennis Weihrauch, Angelika Schaffrath Rosario, Julia Hurraß, Patrick Schmich, Lothar H Wieler
Background: Some COVID-19 testing centres have reported manipulated test numbers for antigen tests/rapid tests. This study compares statistical approaches with traditional fraud detection methods. The extent of agreement between traditional and statistical methods was analysed, as well as the extent to which statistical approaches can identify additional cases of potential fraud.
Methods: Outlier detection marking a high number of tests, modeling of the positivity rate (Poisson Regression), deviation from distributional assumptions regarding the first digit (Benford's Law) and the last digit of the number of reported tests. The basis of the analyses were billing data (April 2021 to August 2022) from 907 testing centres in a German city.
Results: The positive agreement between the conventional and statistical approaches ('sensitivity') was between 8.6% and 24.7%, the negative agreement ('specificity') was between 91.3% and 94.6%. The proportion of potentially fraudulent testing centres additionally identified by statistical approaches was between 7.0% and 8.7%. The combination of at least two statistical methods resulted in an optimal detection rate of test centres with previously undetected initial suspicion.
Conclusions: The statistical approaches were more effective and systematic in identifying potentially fraudulent testing centres than the conventional methods. Testing centres should be urged to map paradata (e.g. timestamps of testing) in future pandemics.
{"title":"Potential COVID-19 test fraud detection: Findings from a pilot study comparing conventional and statistical approaches.","authors":"Michael Bosnjak, Stefan Dahm, Ronny Kuhnert, Dennis Weihrauch, Angelika Schaffrath Rosario, Julia Hurraß, Patrick Schmich, Lothar H Wieler","doi":"10.25646/12100","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some COVID-19 testing centres have reported manipulated test numbers for antigen tests/rapid tests. This study compares statistical approaches with traditional fraud detection methods. The extent of agreement between traditional and statistical methods was analysed, as well as the extent to which statistical approaches can identify additional cases of potential fraud.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outlier detection marking a high number of tests, modeling of the positivity rate (Poisson Regression), deviation from distributional assumptions regarding the first digit (Benford's Law) and the last digit of the number of reported tests. The basis of the analyses were billing data (April 2021 to August 2022) from 907 testing centres in a German city.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive agreement between the conventional and statistical approaches ('sensitivity') was between 8.6% and 24.7%, the negative agreement ('specificity') was between 91.3% and 94.6%. The proportion of potentially fraudulent testing centres additionally identified by statistical approaches was between 7.0% and 8.7%. The combination of at least two statistical methods resulted in an optimal detection rate of test centres with previously undetected initial suspicion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The statistical approaches were more effective and systematic in identifying potentially fraudulent testing centres than the conventional methods. Testing centres should be urged to map paradata (e.g. timestamps of testing) in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262742/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15eCollection Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.25646/12086
Lukas Reitzle, Christin Heidemann, Laura Krause, Jens Hoebel, Christa Scheidt-Nave
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. In 2012, a general screening for GDM was introduced in Germany.
Methods: The analysis is based on data from the external inpatient quality assurance for obstetrics from the years 2013 to 2021. Women with pregestational diabetes were excluded. GDM was defined either by documentation in the maternity record or by ICD diagnosis O24.4 during hospitalisation. We reported the prevalence stratified by year, maternal age and regional socioeconomic deprivation.
Results: The age-standardized prevalence of GDM continuously rose from 4.7 % in 2013 to 8.5 % in 2021. The increase was observed in all age groups. In 2021, this corresponded to 63,563 women with GDM. The prevalence was higher in highly deprived regions than in low deprived regions.
Conclusion: A steady increase in GDM prevalence and evidence of health inequalities emphasise the need for primary prevention strategies for GDM.
{"title":"Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Germany: Temporal trend and differences by regional socioeconomic deprivation.","authors":"Lukas Reitzle, Christin Heidemann, Laura Krause, Jens Hoebel, Christa Scheidt-Nave","doi":"10.25646/12086","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. In 2012, a general screening for GDM was introduced in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis is based on data from the external inpatient quality assurance for obstetrics from the years 2013 to 2021. Women with pregestational diabetes were excluded. GDM was defined either by documentation in the maternity record or by ICD diagnosis O24.4 during hospitalisation. We reported the prevalence stratified by year, maternal age and regional socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardized prevalence of GDM continuously rose from 4.7 % in 2013 to 8.5 % in 2021. The increase was observed in all age groups. In 2021, this corresponded to 63,563 women with GDM. The prevalence was higher in highly deprived regions than in low deprived regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A steady increase in GDM prevalence and evidence of health inequalities emphasise the need for primary prevention strategies for GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152075/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23eCollection Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.25646/12026
Oktay Tuncer, Yong Du, Niels Michalski, Lukas Reitzle
Background: Diabetes-related amputations reduce health-related quality of life and are an indicator of the quality of care of diabetes.
Methods: Population-based age-standardized rates for diabetes-related cases of major and minor amputation were calculated and reported for the years 2015 - 2022 using the Diagnosis-related groups statistics. For 2022 these rates were also reported according to area-level socioeconomic deprivation.
Results: Diabetes-related major amputations decreased from 6.8 to 5.2 per 100,000 residents in women and from 18.6 to 17.5 per 100,000 residents in men between 2015 and 2022. In 2021 and 2022, there was no further decrease in men compared to the previous year. Diabetes-related minor amputations decreased in women between 2015 and 2022, but increased in men. Amputation rates were higher in regions with high deprivation than in regions with low deprivation.
Conclusions: Diabetes care should consider socioeconomic differences into account. The monitoring of the trends in amputations needs to be continued.
{"title":"Diabetes-related amputations in Germany: analysis of time trend from 2015 to 2022 and differences by area-level socioeconomic deprivation.","authors":"Oktay Tuncer, Yong Du, Niels Michalski, Lukas Reitzle","doi":"10.25646/12026","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes-related amputations reduce health-related quality of life and are an indicator of the quality of care of diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population-based age-standardized rates for diabetes-related cases of major and minor amputation were calculated and reported for the years 2015 - 2022 using the Diagnosis-related groups statistics. For 2022 these rates were also reported according to area-level socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diabetes-related major amputations decreased from 6.8 to 5.2 per 100,000 residents in women and from 18.6 to 17.5 per 100,000 residents in men between 2015 and 2022. In 2021 and 2022, there was no further decrease in men compared to the previous year. Diabetes-related minor amputations decreased in women between 2015 and 2022, but increased in men. Amputation rates were higher in regions with high deprivation than in regions with low deprivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes care should consider socioeconomic differences into account. The monitoring of the trends in amputations needs to be continued.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137759/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141199049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}