Pub Date : 2024-06-26eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12199
Christa Scheidt-Nave, Christin Heidemann, Lukas Reitzle, Maike Buchmann, Thomas Ziese, Andrea Icks
{"title":"Diabetes surveillance - Laying the groundwork for non-communicable disease surveillance in Germany.","authors":"Christa Scheidt-Nave, Christin Heidemann, Lukas Reitzle, Maike Buchmann, Thomas Ziese, Andrea Icks","doi":"10.25646/12199","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12199","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12201
Thomas Ziese, Anke-Christine Saß
{"title":"Journal of Health Monitoring - what's new in 2024?","authors":"Thomas Ziese, Anke-Christine Saß","doi":"10.25646/12201","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12201","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12128
Christin Heidemann, Yong Du, Elvira Mauz, Lena Walther, Diana Peitz, Anja Müller, Maike Buchmann, Jennifer Allen, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Jens Baumert
Background: The nationwide study German Health Update (GEDA) 2021/2022-Diabetes was conducted to assess the current healthcare and health situation of adults with diabetes in Germany.
Methods: GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes comprises a sample of adults with diagnosed diabetes from the general population. The analysis focuses on adults aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes (N = 1,448) and provides selected indicators on diabetes care as well as mental, social and general health.
Results: 87.5 % of participants aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes are treated with blood glucose-lowering medication. 36.5 % receive insulin alone or in combination with other antidiabetics; 0.7 % use an insulin pump. Almost 96 % had an HbA1c measurement in the last year and about two thirds each report annual foot and eye examinations, participation in a diabetes self-management education programme and self-monitoring of their feet and of blood glucose (12.0 % with continuous glucose monitoring). On average, the quality of diabetes care is perceived as moderate. 23.8 % rate their mental health as excellent/very good. More than a tenth each have anxiety or depressive symptoms and feelings of loneliness. Half rate their general health as very good/good.
Conclusions: There is a potential for improvement in the quality of diabetes care and the mental and physical health of adults with type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.","authors":"Christin Heidemann, Yong Du, Elvira Mauz, Lena Walther, Diana Peitz, Anja Müller, Maike Buchmann, Jennifer Allen, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Jens Baumert","doi":"10.25646/12128","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nationwide study German Health Update (GEDA) 2021/2022-Diabetes was conducted to assess the current healthcare and health situation of adults with diabetes in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes comprises a sample of adults with diagnosed diabetes from the general population. The analysis focuses on adults aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes (N = 1,448) and provides selected indicators on diabetes care as well as mental, social and general health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>87.5 % of participants aged 45 years and over with type 2 diabetes are treated with blood glucose-lowering medication. 36.5 % receive insulin alone or in combination with other antidiabetics; 0.7 % use an insulin pump. Almost 96 % had an HbA1c measurement in the last year and about two thirds each report annual foot and eye examinations, participation in a diabetes self-management education programme and self-monitoring of their feet and of blood glucose (12.0 % with continuous glucose monitoring). On average, the quality of diabetes care is perceived as moderate. 23.8 % rate their mental health as excellent/very good. More than a tenth each have anxiety or depressive symptoms and feelings of loneliness. Half rate their general health as very good/good.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a potential for improvement in the quality of diabetes care and the mental and physical health of adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.25646/12100
Michael Bosnjak, Stefan Dahm, Ronny Kuhnert, Dennis Weihrauch, Angelika Schaffrath Rosario, Julia Hurraß, Patrick Schmich, Lothar H Wieler
Background: Some COVID-19 testing centres have reported manipulated test numbers for antigen tests/rapid tests. This study compares statistical approaches with traditional fraud detection methods. The extent of agreement between traditional and statistical methods was analysed, as well as the extent to which statistical approaches can identify additional cases of potential fraud.
Methods: Outlier detection marking a high number of tests, modeling of the positivity rate (Poisson Regression), deviation from distributional assumptions regarding the first digit (Benford's Law) and the last digit of the number of reported tests. The basis of the analyses were billing data (April 2021 to August 2022) from 907 testing centres in a German city.
Results: The positive agreement between the conventional and statistical approaches ('sensitivity') was between 8.6% and 24.7%, the negative agreement ('specificity') was between 91.3% and 94.6%. The proportion of potentially fraudulent testing centres additionally identified by statistical approaches was between 7.0% and 8.7%. The combination of at least two statistical methods resulted in an optimal detection rate of test centres with previously undetected initial suspicion.
Conclusions: The statistical approaches were more effective and systematic in identifying potentially fraudulent testing centres than the conventional methods. Testing centres should be urged to map paradata (e.g. timestamps of testing) in future pandemics.
{"title":"Potential COVID-19 test fraud detection: Findings from a pilot study comparing conventional and statistical approaches.","authors":"Michael Bosnjak, Stefan Dahm, Ronny Kuhnert, Dennis Weihrauch, Angelika Schaffrath Rosario, Julia Hurraß, Patrick Schmich, Lothar H Wieler","doi":"10.25646/12100","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some COVID-19 testing centres have reported manipulated test numbers for antigen tests/rapid tests. This study compares statistical approaches with traditional fraud detection methods. The extent of agreement between traditional and statistical methods was analysed, as well as the extent to which statistical approaches can identify additional cases of potential fraud.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outlier detection marking a high number of tests, modeling of the positivity rate (Poisson Regression), deviation from distributional assumptions regarding the first digit (Benford's Law) and the last digit of the number of reported tests. The basis of the analyses were billing data (April 2021 to August 2022) from 907 testing centres in a German city.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive agreement between the conventional and statistical approaches ('sensitivity') was between 8.6% and 24.7%, the negative agreement ('specificity') was between 91.3% and 94.6%. The proportion of potentially fraudulent testing centres additionally identified by statistical approaches was between 7.0% and 8.7%. The combination of at least two statistical methods resulted in an optimal detection rate of test centres with previously undetected initial suspicion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The statistical approaches were more effective and systematic in identifying potentially fraudulent testing centres than the conventional methods. Testing centres should be urged to map paradata (e.g. timestamps of testing) in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262742/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15eCollection Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.25646/12086
Lukas Reitzle, Christin Heidemann, Laura Krause, Jens Hoebel, Christa Scheidt-Nave
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. In 2012, a general screening for GDM was introduced in Germany.
Methods: The analysis is based on data from the external inpatient quality assurance for obstetrics from the years 2013 to 2021. Women with pregestational diabetes were excluded. GDM was defined either by documentation in the maternity record or by ICD diagnosis O24.4 during hospitalisation. We reported the prevalence stratified by year, maternal age and regional socioeconomic deprivation.
Results: The age-standardized prevalence of GDM continuously rose from 4.7 % in 2013 to 8.5 % in 2021. The increase was observed in all age groups. In 2021, this corresponded to 63,563 women with GDM. The prevalence was higher in highly deprived regions than in low deprived regions.
Conclusion: A steady increase in GDM prevalence and evidence of health inequalities emphasise the need for primary prevention strategies for GDM.
{"title":"Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Germany: Temporal trend and differences by regional socioeconomic deprivation.","authors":"Lukas Reitzle, Christin Heidemann, Laura Krause, Jens Hoebel, Christa Scheidt-Nave","doi":"10.25646/12086","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. In 2012, a general screening for GDM was introduced in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis is based on data from the external inpatient quality assurance for obstetrics from the years 2013 to 2021. Women with pregestational diabetes were excluded. GDM was defined either by documentation in the maternity record or by ICD diagnosis O24.4 during hospitalisation. We reported the prevalence stratified by year, maternal age and regional socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardized prevalence of GDM continuously rose from 4.7 % in 2013 to 8.5 % in 2021. The increase was observed in all age groups. In 2021, this corresponded to 63,563 women with GDM. The prevalence was higher in highly deprived regions than in low deprived regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A steady increase in GDM prevalence and evidence of health inequalities emphasise the need for primary prevention strategies for GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152075/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23eCollection Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.25646/12026
Oktay Tuncer, Yong Du, Niels Michalski, Lukas Reitzle
Background: Diabetes-related amputations reduce health-related quality of life and are an indicator of the quality of care of diabetes.
Methods: Population-based age-standardized rates for diabetes-related cases of major and minor amputation were calculated and reported for the years 2015 - 2022 using the Diagnosis-related groups statistics. For 2022 these rates were also reported according to area-level socioeconomic deprivation.
Results: Diabetes-related major amputations decreased from 6.8 to 5.2 per 100,000 residents in women and from 18.6 to 17.5 per 100,000 residents in men between 2015 and 2022. In 2021 and 2022, there was no further decrease in men compared to the previous year. Diabetes-related minor amputations decreased in women between 2015 and 2022, but increased in men. Amputation rates were higher in regions with high deprivation than in regions with low deprivation.
Conclusions: Diabetes care should consider socioeconomic differences into account. The monitoring of the trends in amputations needs to be continued.
{"title":"Diabetes-related amputations in Germany: analysis of time trend from 2015 to 2022 and differences by area-level socioeconomic deprivation.","authors":"Oktay Tuncer, Yong Du, Niels Michalski, Lukas Reitzle","doi":"10.25646/12026","DOIUrl":"10.25646/12026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes-related amputations reduce health-related quality of life and are an indicator of the quality of care of diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population-based age-standardized rates for diabetes-related cases of major and minor amputation were calculated and reported for the years 2015 - 2022 using the Diagnosis-related groups statistics. For 2022 these rates were also reported according to area-level socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diabetes-related major amputations decreased from 6.8 to 5.2 per 100,000 residents in women and from 18.6 to 17.5 per 100,000 residents in men between 2015 and 2022. In 2021 and 2022, there was no further decrease in men compared to the previous year. Diabetes-related minor amputations decreased in women between 2015 and 2022, but increased in men. Amputation rates were higher in regions with high deprivation than in regions with low deprivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes care should consider socioeconomic differences into account. The monitoring of the trends in amputations needs to be continued.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 2","pages":"e12026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137759/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141199049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-16eCollection Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.25646/12077
Johannes Lemcke, Julika Loss, Jennifer Allen, Ilter Öztürk, Marcel Hintze, Stefan Damerow, Tim Kuttig, Matthias Wetzstein, Claudia Hövener, Ulfert Hapke, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Patrick Schmich
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.25646/11992.2.].
[此处更正了文章 DOI:10.25646/11992.2]。
{"title":"Corrigendum: Health in Germany: Establishment of a population-based health panel.","authors":"Johannes Lemcke, Julika Loss, Jennifer Allen, Ilter Öztürk, Marcel Hintze, Stefan Damerow, Tim Kuttig, Matthias Wetzstein, Claudia Hövener, Ulfert Hapke, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Patrick Schmich","doi":"10.25646/12077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/12077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.25646/11992.2.].</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 Suppl 2","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024579/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-13eCollection Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.25646/11992.2
Johannes Lemcke, Julika Loss, Jennifer Allen, Ilter Öztürk, Marcel Hintze, Stefan Damerow, Tim Kuttig, Matthias Wetzstein, Claudia Hövener, Ulfert Hapke, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Patrick Schmich
[This corrects the article on p. 2,21 in vol. 9, PMID: 38282983.].
[此处更正了第 9 卷第 2.21 页的文章,PMID:38282983]。
{"title":"Erratum: Health in Germany: Establishment of a population-based health panel.","authors":"Johannes Lemcke, Julika Loss, Jennifer Allen, Ilter Öztürk, Marcel Hintze, Stefan Damerow, Tim Kuttig, Matthias Wetzstein, Claudia Hövener, Ulfert Hapke, Thomas Ziese, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Patrick Schmich","doi":"10.25646/11992.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/11992.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article on p. 2,21 in vol. 9, PMID: 38282983.].</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 Suppl 2","pages":"2-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140869064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-04eCollection Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.25646/11872
Saskia M Fischer, Ludwig Bilz
Background: Bullying is a form of violence that is carried out repeatedly, with the intention of causing harm and with an imbalance of power between those involved. Bullying has serious negative effects on the mental health of adolescents and thus represents a significant health risk in childhood and adolescence.
Methods: Based on data from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from the survey year 2022 in Germany (N = 6,475), the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying among 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds in Germany was analysed. In addition, the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying was analysed as a trend from 2009/10 to 2022 (bullying) and from 2017/18 to 2022 (cyberbullying).
Results: Around 14 % of the learners surveyed reported direct experience of bullying at school, and around 7 % reported cyberbullying experiences as bullied and/or bullying victims. Adolescents who identified as gender diverse were particularly likely to report bullying experiences. School bullying decreased over time, but remained stable between 2017/18 and 2022. Cyberbullying, on the other hand, increased in 2022 compared to 2017/18.
Conclusions: Experiencing bullying at school and online is an everyday experience for many children and young people, so there is still a need for the broad implementation of effective anti-bullying measures in schools.
{"title":"Traditional bullying and cyberbullying at schools in Germany: Results of the HBSC study 2022 and trends from 2009/10 to 2022.","authors":"Saskia M Fischer, Ludwig Bilz","doi":"10.25646/11872","DOIUrl":"10.25646/11872","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bullying is a form of violence that is carried out repeatedly, with the intention of causing harm and with an imbalance of power between those involved. Bullying has serious negative effects on the mental health of adolescents and thus represents a significant health risk in childhood and adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on data from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from the survey year 2022 in Germany (N = 6,475), the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying among 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds in Germany was analysed. In addition, the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying was analysed as a trend from 2009/10 to 2022 (bullying) and from 2017/18 to 2022 (cyberbullying).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Around 14 % of the learners surveyed reported direct experience of bullying at school, and around 7 % reported cyberbullying experiences as bullied and/or bullying victims. Adolescents who identified as gender diverse were particularly likely to report bullying experiences. School bullying decreased over time, but remained stable between 2017/18 and 2022. Cyberbullying, on the other hand, increased in 2022 compared to 2017/18.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experiencing bullying at school and online is an everyday experience for many children and young people, so there is still a need for the broad implementation of effective anti-bullying measures in schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 1","pages":"42-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10977470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140337918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-04eCollection Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.25646/11876
Irene Moor, Max Herke, Jenny Markert, Marie Böhm, Franziska Reiß, Ludwig Bilz, Gorden Sudeck, Kristina Winter
Background: Many studies have identified health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, it is unclear how these have developed in recent years, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Analyses are based on the German data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from 2009/10 (n = 5,005), 2013/14 (n = 5,961), 2017/18 (n = 4,347), and 2022 (n = 6,475). A total of 21,788 students aged approximately between 11 and 15 years were included. Socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using the Family Affluence Scale (FAS). Several health indicators were analysed stratified by gender using bivariate and multivariate analysis methods.
Results: In 2022, there are clear socioeconomic inequalities in life satisfaction, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, and physical activity. These inequalities remained largely constant or increased between 2009/10 and 2022. Between 2017/18 and 2022, no significant changes in inequalities were found.
Conclusions: Health inequalities are persistent and reduce the chances of growing up healthy. There is no evidence that inequalities in the analysed outcomes have changed during the pandemic period (between 2017/18 and 2022). Rather, the changes in the health indicators seem to affect all adolescents in a similar way.
{"title":"Trends in health inequalities in childhood and adolescence in Germany: Results of the HBSC study 2009/10 - 2022.","authors":"Irene Moor, Max Herke, Jenny Markert, Marie Böhm, Franziska Reiß, Ludwig Bilz, Gorden Sudeck, Kristina Winter","doi":"10.25646/11876","DOIUrl":"10.25646/11876","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have identified health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, it is unclear how these have developed in recent years, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses are based on the German data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from 2009/10 (n = 5,005), 2013/14 (n = 5,961), 2017/18 (n = 4,347), and 2022 (n = 6,475). A total of 21,788 students aged approximately between 11 and 15 years were included. Socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using the Family Affluence Scale (FAS). Several health indicators were analysed stratified by gender using bivariate and multivariate analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, there are clear socioeconomic inequalities in life satisfaction, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, and physical activity. These inequalities remained largely constant or increased between 2009/10 and 2022. Between 2017/18 and 2022, no significant changes in inequalities were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health inequalities are persistent and reduce the chances of growing up healthy. There is no evidence that inequalities in the analysed outcomes have changed during the pandemic period (between 2017/18 and 2022). Rather, the changes in the health indicators seem to affect all adolescents in a similar way.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 1","pages":"79-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10977468/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140337919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}