首页 > 最新文献

Journal of health monitoring最新文献

英文 中文
Changes in mental health in the German child and adolescent population during the COVID-19 pandemic - Results of a rapid review. COVID-19大流行期间德国儿童和青少年人群心理健康的变化——快速回顾的结果
Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.25646/10761
Robert Schlack, Laura Neuperdt, Stephan Junker, Sophie Eicher, Heike Hölling, Julia Thom, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Ann-Kristin Beyer

Background: This rapid review examines changes in the mental health of the German child and adolescent population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: The basis are 39 publications, which were identified by means of systematic literature search (until 19.11.2021) and manual search. The databases of the included publications were systematized with regard to their representativeness for the general population, and the indicators used were categorized with regard to the depicted constructs and their reliability.

Results: The large majority of the studies took place at the beginning of the pandemic until the summer plateau 2020. Representative studies mainly reported high levels of pandemic-related stress, increases in mental health problems, and negative impacts on the quality of life. Non-representative studies showed mixed results. Vulnerable groups could only be identified to a limited extent. Both routine and care-related data showed declines in the outpatient and inpatient service utilisation during the various waves of the pandemic followed by catch-up effects. Children and adolescents turned out to be more vulnerable during the pandemic compared to adults, but their stress levels varied with the waves of the pandemic and the related containment measures.

Conclusions: A future forward-looking crisis and pandemic management requires a close-knit and continuous surveillance of the mental health of children as well as an improved identification of risk groups.

背景:本快速回顾研究了COVID-19大流行期间德国儿童和青少年人群心理健康的变化。方法:采用系统文献检索(截止到2021年11月19日)和人工检索的方法对39篇文献进行检索。纳入出版物的数据库根据其对一般人群的代表性进行了系统化,使用的指标根据所描述的结构及其可靠性进行了分类。结果:绝大多数研究是在大流行开始到2020年夏季高原期间进行的。代表性研究主要报告了与流行病有关的高度压力、心理健康问题的增加以及对生活质量的负面影响。非代表性研究的结果喜忧参半。脆弱群体只能在有限的程度上得到确认。常规数据和与护理相关的数据都显示,在大流行的各种浪潮期间,门诊和住院服务的使用率下降,随后出现了追赶效应。事实证明,与成年人相比,儿童和青少年在大流行期间更容易受到伤害,但他们的压力水平随着大流行的浪潮和相关的遏制措施而变化。结论:面向未来的危机和大流行病管理需要对儿童的心理健康进行紧密和持续的监测,并改进对风险群体的识别。
{"title":"Changes in mental health in the German child and adolescent population during the COVID-19 pandemic - Results of a rapid review.","authors":"Robert Schlack,&nbsp;Laura Neuperdt,&nbsp;Stephan Junker,&nbsp;Sophie Eicher,&nbsp;Heike Hölling,&nbsp;Julia Thom,&nbsp;Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer,&nbsp;Ann-Kristin Beyer","doi":"10.25646/10761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/10761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This rapid review examines changes in the mental health of the German child and adolescent population during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The basis are 39 publications, which were identified by means of systematic literature search (until 19.11.2021) and manual search. The databases of the included publications were systematized with regard to their representativeness for the general population, and the indicators used were categorized with regard to the depicted constructs and their reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The large majority of the studies took place at the beginning of the pandemic until the summer plateau 2020. Representative studies mainly reported high levels of pandemic-related stress, increases in mental health problems, and negative impacts on the quality of life. Non-representative studies showed mixed results. Vulnerable groups could only be identified to a limited extent. Both routine and care-related data showed declines in the outpatient and inpatient service utilisation during the various waves of the pandemic followed by catch-up effects. Children and adolescents turned out to be more vulnerable during the pandemic compared to adults, but their stress levels varied with the waves of the pandemic and the related containment measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A future forward-looking crisis and pandemic management requires a close-knit and continuous surveillance of the mental health of children as well as an improved identification of risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"8 Suppl 1","pages":"2-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10768791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Depressive symptoms in the general population before and in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the GEDA 2019/2020 study. COVID-19 大流行之前和第一年普通人群的抑郁症状:GEDA 2019/2020 研究结果。
Pub Date : 2022-12-20 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.25646/10664
Ulfert Hapke, Christina Kersjes, Jens Hoebel, Ronny Kuhnert, Sophie Eicher, Stefan Damerow

Background: Study results on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the first year of the pandemic are contradictory. The GEDA 2019/2020 study makes it possible to examine changes in depressive symptoms in the population.

Methods: A standardised telephone interview was used to survey a random sample of the population in Germany aged 15 and older. To exclude seasonal effects, 10,220 interviewees from the period April 2019 to January 2020 were compared with 11,900 from the period April 2020 to January 2021. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the internationally established 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8).

Results: The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased from 9.2% to 7.6% in the first year of the pandemic. Changes differ between women and men as well as between age and education groups. The analysis of individual symptoms suggests that it is not about a reduction of mental disorders of the depressive type in the narrower sense, but rather a decrease in stress-associated individual symptoms.

Conclusions: The decrease in stress-associated depressive symptoms in parts of the population can be interpreted as an indication that pandemic-related changes in everyday life and the working environment may have had a positive effect on individual areas of mental health in certain groups, at least temporarily in the first year of the pandemic. The continuing strong social inequality in depressive symptoms to the disadvantage of low education groups confirms that the need for social situation-related health promotion and prevention with regard to the living and working conditions of socially disadvantaged people must not be lost sight of in times of pandemic. For groups in the population that partly showed a worsening of symptoms in this phase of the pandemic, e.g. the diminished ability to concentrate of very old men, targeted support options should be created in the future.

背景:关于COVID-19大流行第一年对心理健康影响的研究结果相互矛盾。GEDA 2019/2020 研究使人们有可能对抑郁症状的变化进行调查:方法:采用标准化的电话访问方式,对德国 15 岁及以上人口进行随机抽样调查。为排除季节性影响,2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 1 月期间的 10,220 名受访者与 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 1 月期间的 11,900 名受访者进行了比较。抑郁症状采用国际通用的 8 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)进行评估:结果:在大流行的第一年,抑郁症状的流行率从 9.2% 降至 7.6%。女性和男性之间以及不同年龄和教育程度群体之间的变化各不相同。对个体症状的分析表明,这并不是狭义的抑郁型精神障碍的减少,而是与压力相关的个体症状的减少:部分人群中与压力相关的抑郁症状有所减少,这表明与大流行病相关的日常生活和工作环境的变化可能对某些群体的心理健康产生了积极影响,至少在大流行病的第一年是暂时的。抑郁症状方面持续存在的严重社会不平等现象使低学历群体处于不利地位,这证明在大流行病时期,绝不能忽视与社会状况相关的健康促进和预防工作,以改善社会弱势群体的生活和工作条件。对于在大流行病的这一阶段部分表现出症状恶化的人群,例如注意力不集中的老年男性,今后应制定有针对性的支助方案。
{"title":"Depressive symptoms in the general population before and in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the GEDA 2019/2020 study.","authors":"Ulfert Hapke, Christina Kersjes, Jens Hoebel, Ronny Kuhnert, Sophie Eicher, Stefan Damerow","doi":"10.25646/10664","DOIUrl":"10.25646/10664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Study results on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the first year of the pandemic are contradictory. The GEDA 2019/2020 study makes it possible to examine changes in depressive symptoms in the population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standardised telephone interview was used to survey a random sample of the population in Germany aged 15 and older. To exclude seasonal effects, 10,220 interviewees from the period April 2019 to January 2020 were compared with 11,900 from the period April 2020 to January 2021. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the internationally established 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased from 9.2% to 7.6% in the first year of the pandemic. Changes differ between women and men as well as between age and education groups. The analysis of individual symptoms suggests that it is not about a reduction of mental disorders of the depressive type in the narrower sense, but rather a decrease in stress-associated individual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The decrease in stress-associated depressive symptoms in parts of the population can be interpreted as an indication that pandemic-related changes in everyday life and the working environment may have had a positive effect on individual areas of mental health in certain groups, at least temporarily in the first year of the pandemic. The continuing strong social inequality in depressive symptoms to the disadvantage of low education groups confirms that the need for social situation-related health promotion and prevention with regard to the living and working conditions of socially disadvantaged people must not be lost sight of in times of pandemic. For groups in the population that partly showed a worsening of symptoms in this phase of the pandemic, e.g. the diminished ability to concentrate of very old men, targeted support options should be created in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 4","pages":"3-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9100292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Change in sports activity and walking and cycling for transport since the COVID-19 pandemic - Results of the GEDA 2021 study. 自 COVID-19 大流行以来体育活动以及步行和骑自行车出行的变化 - GEDA 2021 研究的结果。
Pub Date : 2022-12-20 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.25646/10666
Kristin Manz, Susanne Krug

Background: Physical activity is a significant health promotion behaviour. COVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures, such as reducing social contact, closing sports facilities and working from home offices, may make it more difficult to engage in regular physical activity.

Methods: The data collected between July and October 2021 from the nationally representative study German Health Update (GEDA 2021) were used. The activity behaviour is described by the change in the amount of sports activity as well as the amount of physical active transport (walking/cycling) since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample comprises 2,985 participants aged 18 and older.

Results: A quarter of the population reduced their sports activity compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, while 12% increased their sports activity and 38% reported no change. In terms of physical active transport, it shows that 15% reduced the amount, 17% increased it and 55% maintained it. Compared to younger adults, older adults were more likely to maintain their activity behaviour rather than reduce or increase it.

Conclusion: Even before the pandemic, physical inactivity was common among the population. The high proportion of adults who reduced their sports activity during the pandemic underlines the need for effective measures to promote physical activity.

背景:体育活动是促进健康的重要行为。COVID-19大流行缓解措施,如减少社会接触、关闭体育设施和在家办公等,可能会使人们更难进行有规律的体育锻炼:方法:使用了 2021 年 7 月至 10 月期间从具有全国代表性的研究 "德国健康更新"(GEDA 2021)中收集的数据。活动行为通过自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来体育活动量的变化以及积极的体育交通(步行/骑自行车)量的变化来描述。样本包括 2,985 名 18 岁及以上的参与者:结果:与 COVID-19 大流行之前相比,四分之一的人减少了体育活动,12% 的人增加了体育活动,38% 的人表示没有变化。在积极的体育运动方面,15%的人减少了运动量,17%的人增加了运动量,55%的人保持了运动量。与年轻人相比,老年人更倾向于保持活动量,而不是减少或增加活动量:结论:即使在大流行病发生之前,缺乏运动在人群中也很普遍。在大流行期间,减少体育活动的成年人比例很高,这说明有必要采取有效措施来促进体育活动。
{"title":"Change in sports activity and walking and cycling for transport since the COVID-19 pandemic - Results of the GEDA 2021 study.","authors":"Kristin Manz, Susanne Krug","doi":"10.25646/10666","DOIUrl":"10.25646/10666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity is a significant health promotion behaviour. COVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures, such as reducing social contact, closing sports facilities and working from home offices, may make it more difficult to engage in regular physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data collected between July and October 2021 from the nationally representative study German Health Update (GEDA 2021) were used. The activity behaviour is described by the change in the amount of sports activity as well as the amount of physical active transport (walking/cycling) since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample comprises 2,985 participants aged 18 and older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A quarter of the population reduced their sports activity compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, while 12% increased their sports activity and 38% reported no change. In terms of physical active transport, it shows that 15% reduced the amount, 17% increased it and 55% maintained it. Compared to younger adults, older adults were more likely to maintain their activity behaviour rather than reduce or increase it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even before the pandemic, physical inactivity was common among the population. The high proportion of adults who reduced their sports activity during the pandemic underlines the need for effective measures to promote physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 4","pages":"22-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9100289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD): Revision, update and applications. 德国社会经济贫困指数(GISD):修订、更新和应用。
Pub Date : 2022-12-09 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.25646/10641
Niels Michalski, Marvin Reis, Fabian Tetzlaff, Meik Herber, Lars Eric Kroll, Claudia Hövener, Enno Nowossadeck, Jens Hoebel

Background: Regional deprivation indices enable researchers to analyse associations between socioeconomic disadvantages and health outcomes even if the health data of interest does not include information on the individuals' socioeconomic position. This article introduces the recent revision of the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD) and presents associations with life expectancy as well as age-standardised cardiovascular mortality rates and cancer incidences as applications.

Methods: The GISD measures the level of socioeconomic deprivation using administrative data of education, employment, and income situations at the district and municipality level from the INKAR database. The indicators are weighted via principal component analyses. The regional distribution is depicted cartographically, regional level associations with health outcomes are presented.

Results: The principal component analysis indicates medium to high correlations of the indicators with the index subdimensions. Correlation analyses show that in districts with the lowest deprivation, the average life expectancy of men is approximately six years longer (up to three years longer for women) than for those from districts with the highest deprivation. A similar social gradient is observed for cardiovascular mortality and lung cancer incidence.

Conclusions: The GISD provides a valuable tool to analyse socioeconomic inequalities in health conditions, diseases, and their determinants at the regional level.

背景:地区贫困指数使研究人员能够分析社会经济劣势与健康结果之间的关联,即使相关的健康数据不包括个人的社会经济地位信息。本文介绍了最近修订的德国社会经济贫困指数(GISD),并将其与预期寿命以及年龄标准化心血管死亡率和癌症发病率之间的关联作为应用进行了介绍:GISD 使用 INKAR 数据库中地区和市一级的教育、就业和收入情况的行政数据来衡量社会经济贫困程度。这些指标通过主成分分析进行加权。结果:主成分分析表明,各项指标与指数子维度之间存在中高相关性。相关性分析表明,在贫困程度最低的地区,男性的平均预期寿命比贫困程度最高的地区的男性平均预期寿命长约 6 年(女性长达 3 年)。在心血管死亡率和肺癌发病率方面也观察到类似的社会梯度:GISD 为分析区域一级健康状况、疾病及其决定因素方面的社会经济不平等现象提供了宝贵的工具。
{"title":"German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD): Revision, update and applications.","authors":"Niels Michalski, Marvin Reis, Fabian Tetzlaff, Meik Herber, Lars Eric Kroll, Claudia Hövener, Enno Nowossadeck, Jens Hoebel","doi":"10.25646/10641","DOIUrl":"10.25646/10641","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional deprivation indices enable researchers to analyse associations between socioeconomic disadvantages and health outcomes even if the health data of interest does not include information on the individuals' socioeconomic position. This article introduces the recent revision of the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD) and presents associations with life expectancy as well as age-standardised cardiovascular mortality rates and cancer incidences as applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GISD measures the level of socioeconomic deprivation using administrative data of education, employment, and income situations at the district and municipality level from the INKAR database. The indicators are weighted via principal component analyses. The regional distribution is depicted cartographically, regional level associations with health outcomes are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The principal component analysis indicates medium to high correlations of the indicators with the index subdimensions. Correlation analyses show that in districts with the lowest deprivation, the average life expectancy of men is approximately six years longer (up to three years longer for women) than for those from districts with the highest deprivation. A similar social gradient is observed for cardiovascular mortality and lung cancer incidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GISD provides a valuable tool to analyse socioeconomic inequalities in health conditions, diseases, and their determinants at the regional level.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 Suppl 5","pages":"2-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10870335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Participation of the adult population in preventive measures for non-communicable diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020/2021. 2020/2021年2019冠状病毒病大流行期间成年人口参与非传染性疾病预防措施的情况。
Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.25646/10668
Susanne Jordan, Ronny Kuhnert, Nora Katharina Schmid-Küpke, Anne Starker

Background: In 2020/2021, the COVID-19 pandemic and the protective measures associated therewith severely limited the opportunity to participate in prevention and health promotion measures. The article examines the utilisation of the measures and possible factors that are associated with a lower participation during these pandemic years.

Methods: It is based on data acquired between March and August 2021 from the study 'COVID-19 vaccination rate monitoring in Germany' (COVIMO), a cross-sectional telephone survey. The data was used to examine the participation in preventive measures in the last 12 months in terms of sociodemographic factors and to analyse a decreased participation with regard to pandemic-related factors. The analysis sample includes individuals aged 18 years and over (n=3,998).

Results: 63% of participants generally did not use these programmes, 7% indicated an unchanged participation, 28% reported having participated in fewer measures, and 2% in more measures. Men reported significantly more often than women that they generally do not participate in prevention and health promotion measures. A relevant pandemic-related factor for decreased participation of men was the less clearly perceived comprehensibility of the regulations against the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusions: Prevention and health promotion should be part of the contingency planning in epidemically significant situations to prevent a decreased participation and to promote health and gender-related equal opportunities even in a crisis.

背景:2020/2021年,COVID-19大流行及其相关防护措施严重限制了参与预防和健康促进措施的机会。本文审查了这些措施的使用情况,以及在这些大流行年份与较低的参与率有关的可能因素。方法:该研究基于2021年3月至8月从“德国COVID-19疫苗接种率监测”(COVIMO)研究中获得的数据,这是一项横断面电话调查。这些数据用于从社会人口因素方面审查过去12个月预防措施的参与情况,并分析与大流行病有关的因素方面参与率下降的情况。分析样本包括18岁及以上的个体(n=3,998)。结果:63%的参与者一般不使用这些方案,7%的参与者表示参与不变,28%的人报告参加较少的措施,2%的人参加更多的措施。男子报告说,他们一般不参加预防和促进健康措施的情况明显多于妇女。与大流行有关的男性参与人数减少的一个相关因素是,人们对防止SARS-CoV-2传播的规定的可理解性不太清楚。结论:在重大流行病情况下,预防和促进健康应成为应急规划的一部分,以防止参与率下降,并在危机中促进与健康和性别有关的平等机会。
{"title":"Participation of the adult population in preventive measures for non-communicable diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020/2021.","authors":"Susanne Jordan,&nbsp;Ronny Kuhnert,&nbsp;Nora Katharina Schmid-Küpke,&nbsp;Anne Starker","doi":"10.25646/10668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/10668","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020/2021, the COVID-19 pandemic and the protective measures associated therewith severely limited the opportunity to participate in prevention and health promotion measures. The article examines the utilisation of the measures and possible factors that are associated with a lower participation during these pandemic years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is based on data acquired between March and August 2021 from the study 'COVID-19 vaccination rate monitoring in Germany' (COVIMO), a cross-sectional telephone survey. The data was used to examine the participation in preventive measures in the last 12 months in terms of sociodemographic factors and to analyse a decreased participation with regard to pandemic-related factors. The analysis sample includes individuals aged 18 years and over (n=3,998).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>63% of participants generally did not use these programmes, 7% indicated an unchanged participation, 28% reported having participated in fewer measures, and 2% in more measures. Men reported significantly more often than women that they generally do not participate in prevention and health promotion measures. A relevant pandemic-related factor for decreased participation of men was the less clearly perceived comprehensibility of the regulations against the spread of SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prevention and health promotion should be part of the contingency planning in epidemically significant situations to prevent a decreased participation and to promote health and gender-related equal opportunities even in a crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 4","pages":"36-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10604154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How has body weight changed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic? 自COVID-19大流行开始以来,体重发生了什么变化?
Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.25646/10670
Anja Schienkiewitz, Stefan Damerow, Almut Richter, Gert B M Mensink

Background: Measures for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021 resulted in drastic changes in physical activity and dietary habits that also impacted body weight.

Methods: The representative study German Health Update (GEDA 2021) includes self-reported information about body weight and body height for adults aged 18 years and older (n=2,985) from July to October 2021. In addition, the study asked about changes in body weight since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: For 59% of participants, body weight has not changed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, 26% report weight gain, and 15% report weight loss. Younger people indicate weight gain more often than older people, and individuals with obesity report weight gain more often than individuals without obesity. 1.5 years after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the average weight change within the population is approximately +0.34kg.

Conclusions: The effects of restrictions in everyday life with regard to the possible negative impacts on body weight should be given greater consideration and should be monitored in the future.

背景:2020年和2021年遏制COVID-19大流行的措施导致身体活动和饮食习惯发生了巨大变化,这也影响了体重。方法:代表性研究德国健康更新(GEDA 2021)包括2021年7月至10月期间18岁及以上成年人(n= 2985)的体重和身高自我报告信息。此外,该研究还询问了自COVID-19大流行开始以来体重的变化。结果:59%的参与者自COVID-19大流行开始以来体重没有变化,26%的人体重增加,15%的人体重减轻。年轻人比老年人更容易体重增加,肥胖的人比没有肥胖的人更容易体重增加。在COVID-19大流行开始1.5年后,人群中的平均体重变化约为+0.34kg。结论:日常生活中的限制措施对体重可能产生的负面影响应给予更多的考虑,并应在未来进行监测。
{"title":"How has body weight changed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic?","authors":"Anja Schienkiewitz,&nbsp;Stefan Damerow,&nbsp;Almut Richter,&nbsp;Gert B M Mensink","doi":"10.25646/10670","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/10670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measures for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021 resulted in drastic changes in physical activity and dietary habits that also impacted body weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The representative study German Health Update (GEDA 2021) includes self-reported information about body weight and body height for adults aged 18 years and older (n=2,985) from July to October 2021. In addition, the study asked about changes in body weight since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 59% of participants, body weight has not changed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, 26% report weight gain, and 15% report weight loss. Younger people indicate weight gain more often than older people, and individuals with obesity report weight gain more often than individuals without obesity. 1.5 years after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the average weight change within the population is approximately +0.34kg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effects of restrictions in everyday life with regard to the possible negative impacts on body weight should be given greater consideration and should be monitored in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 4","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838131/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9100291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
How much do adults sit? Results from the German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). 成年人坐的时间有多长?德国健康更新(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)的结果。
Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/10295
Kristin Manz, Olga M Domanska, Ronny Kuhnert, Susanne Krug

Background: Sedentary behaviour is increasingly perceived as a risk factor for the development of diseases and for increased mortality. In particular, increased time spent sitting in combination with low physical activity seems to have negative health consequences.

Methods: In the nationwide cross-sectional study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS), the indicator 'sitting' was captured by the self-report of the participants.

Results: For at least eight hours a day, 16.7% of women and 22.3% of men sit: Men more often than women, younger persons more often than older persons and the proportion increases significantly from the low to the high education group. Similarly, about one fifth of adults in Germany sit for at least four hours a day and do not engage in physical activity in their leisure time.

Conclusion: The results indicate that preventive measures are needed to reduce time spent sitting and increase physical activity.

背景:越来越多的人认为久坐不动是导致疾病发生和死亡率上升的风险因素。特别是,坐着的时间增加,再加上运动量少,似乎会对健康产生负面影响:方法:在全国范围的横断面研究 "德国健康更新"(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)中,"坐 "这一指标由参与者自我报告:结果:16.7%的女性和22.3%的男性每天至少坐8小时:男性比女性更经常坐着,年轻人比老年人更经常坐着,而且从教育程度低的群体到教育程度高的群体,坐着的比例明显增加。同样,德国约有五分之一的成年人每天至少坐四个小时,并且在闲暇时间不参加体育活动:结论:研究结果表明,需要采取预防措施来减少久坐时间和增加体育锻炼。
{"title":"How much do adults sit? Results from the German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS).","authors":"Kristin Manz, Olga M Domanska, Ronny Kuhnert, Susanne Krug","doi":"10.25646/10295","DOIUrl":"10.25646/10295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedentary behaviour is increasingly perceived as a risk factor for the development of diseases and for increased mortality. In particular, increased time spent sitting in combination with low physical activity seems to have negative health consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the nationwide cross-sectional study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS), the indicator 'sitting' was captured by the self-report of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For at least eight hours a day, 16.7% of women and 22.3% of men sit: Men more often than women, younger persons more often than older persons and the proportion increases significantly from the low to the high education group. Similarly, about one fifth of adults in Germany sit for at least four hours a day and do not engage in physical activity in their leisure time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that preventive measures are needed to reduce time spent sitting and increase physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 3","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10571569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health behaviour in Germany - ongoing cause for concern! 德国的健康行为——持续引起关注!
Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/10289
Julika Loss
{"title":"Health behaviour in Germany - ongoing cause for concern!","authors":"Julika Loss","doi":"10.25646/10289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/10289","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40391640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smoking behaviour and passive smoke exposure of adults - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. 成年人的吸烟行为和被动吸烟暴露 - GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 的结果。
Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/10291
Anne Starker, Ronny Kuhnert, Jens Hoebel, Almut Richter

Background: Smoking is a significant health risk and the leading cause of premature death. Passive smoke causes the same negative effects on health as smoking, albeit to a lesser extent. The reduction of tobacco consumption and the protection against passive smoke are thus important health objectives.

Methods: The study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) is a cross-sectional telephone survey (04/2019 to 09/2020) of the resident population in Germany with questions relating to the current smoking behaviour and relating to the passive smoke exposure. The analysis sample comprises 22,708 persons from 18 years of age.

Results: 24.0% of women and 33.9% of men from 18 years of age smoke currently, at least occasionally. Among both sexes, adults from 65 years of age smoke significantly more rarely than adults in the younger age groups. 4.1% of adults, who do not smoke themselves, are subjected daily to passive smoke exposure indoors. This affects in particular young adults and men. There are educational differences in tobacco consumption and in passive smoke exposure to the disadvantage of adults from lower educational groups.

Conclusions: In Germany, there is still a need for action for effective measures for tobacco prevention, smoking cessation and tobacco control policy, which are effective in all population groups and which take into account the concerns of socially disadvantaged groups.

背景:吸烟严重危害健康,是导致过早死亡的主要原因。被动吸烟对健康的负面影响与吸烟相同,只是程度较轻。因此,减少烟草消费和防止被动吸烟是重要的健康目标:德国健康更新研究(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)是一项针对德国常住人口的横断面电话调查(2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 9 月),调查问题涉及当前吸烟行为和被动吸烟暴露。分析样本包括 22 708 名 18 岁以上的人。结果显示:24.0% 的 18 岁以上女性和 33.9% 的 18 岁以上男性目前至少偶尔吸烟。在男性和女性中,65 岁以上的成年人吸烟的比例明显高于年轻的成年人。4.1%的成年人自己不吸烟,但每天都会在室内受到被动吸烟的影响。青壮年和男性受到的影响尤为严重。在烟草消费和被动吸烟方面存在教育差异,这对教育程度较低的成年人不利:在德国,仍然需要采取有效措施来预防烟草、戒烟和制定烟草控制政策,这些措施对所有人群都有效,并考虑到社会弱势群体的关切。
{"title":"Smoking behaviour and passive smoke exposure of adults - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.","authors":"Anne Starker, Ronny Kuhnert, Jens Hoebel, Almut Richter","doi":"10.25646/10291","DOIUrl":"10.25646/10291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking is a significant health risk and the leading cause of premature death. Passive smoke causes the same negative effects on health as smoking, albeit to a lesser extent. The reduction of tobacco consumption and the protection against passive smoke are thus important health objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) is a cross-sectional telephone survey (04/2019 to 09/2020) of the resident population in Germany with questions relating to the current smoking behaviour and relating to the passive smoke exposure. The analysis sample comprises 22,708 persons from 18 years of age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24.0% of women and 33.9% of men from 18 years of age smoke currently, at least occasionally. Among both sexes, adults from 65 years of age smoke significantly more rarely than adults in the younger age groups. 4.1% of adults, who do not smoke themselves, are subjected daily to passive smoke exposure indoors. This affects in particular young adults and men. There are educational differences in tobacco consumption and in passive smoke exposure to the disadvantage of adults from lower educational groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Germany, there is still a need for action for effective measures for tobacco prevention, smoking cessation and tobacco control policy, which are effective in all population groups and which take into account the concerns of socially disadvantaged groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 3","pages":"6-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520347/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10867300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overweight and obesity among adults in Germany - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. 德国成年人超重和肥胖——GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS结果
Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.25646/10293
Anja Schienkiewitz, Ronny Kuhnert, Miriam Blume, Gert B M Mensink

Background: Overweight and obesity and their associated secondary diseases are of high public health relevance.

Methods: Self-reported body weight and body height data are available in the study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). The body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was calculated and overweight (including obesity, BMI ≥25 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were derived.

Results: According to this self-report, 53.5% of adults in Germany are overweight, men more often than women. The obesity prevalence for both sexes is 19.0%. The prevalence of overweight and obesity increases with age in both women and men. Obesity is significantly more prevalent in low education groups compared to high education groups. Compared to GEDA 2012, the prevalence of overweight is unchanged, but the obesity prevalence has continued to increase, particularly among 45- to 64-year-olds.

Conclusion: The prevention potential of avoiding overweight and obesity remains high.

背景:超重和肥胖及其相关的继发性疾病具有高度的公共卫生相关性。方法:自我报告的体重和身高数据可在德国健康更新(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)研究中获得。计算体重指数(BMI, kg/m2),得出超重(包括肥胖,BMI≥25 kg/m2)和肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m2)。结果:根据这份自我报告,53.5%的德国成年人超重,男性多于女性。男女肥胖率均为19.0%。在女性和男性中,超重和肥胖的患病率随着年龄的增长而增加。与受教育程度高的人群相比,肥胖在受教育程度低的人群中更为普遍。与2012年GEDA相比,超重患病率没有变化,但肥胖患病率继续增加,特别是在45至64岁人群中。结论:预防超重和肥胖的潜力仍然很大。
{"title":"Overweight and obesity among adults in Germany - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.","authors":"Anja Schienkiewitz,&nbsp;Ronny Kuhnert,&nbsp;Miriam Blume,&nbsp;Gert B M Mensink","doi":"10.25646/10293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25646/10293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overweight and obesity and their associated secondary diseases are of high public health relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-reported body weight and body height data are available in the study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). The body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) was calculated and overweight (including obesity, BMI ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to this self-report, 53.5% of adults in Germany are overweight, men more often than women. The obesity prevalence for both sexes is 19.0%. The prevalence of overweight and obesity increases with age in both women and men. Obesity is significantly more prevalent in low education groups compared to high education groups. Compared to GEDA 2012, the prevalence of overweight is unchanged, but the obesity prevalence has continued to increase, particularly among 45- to 64-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevention potential of avoiding overweight and obesity remains high.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"7 3","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10867299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
期刊
Journal of health monitoring
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1