首页 > 最新文献

Journal of minimally invasive surgery最新文献

英文 中文
In reference to 'Directed acyclic graphs for clinical research: a tutorial'. 关于 "临床研究中的有向无环图:教程"。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.222
Anjali Rajkumar, Vishak Ms
{"title":"In reference to '<i>Directed acyclic graphs for clinical research: a tutorial</i>'.","authors":"Anjali Rajkumar, Vishak Ms","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.222","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.222","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"222-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728680/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mastering data visualization with Python: practical tips for researchers. 用 Python 掌握数据可视化:研究人员的实用技巧。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.167
Soyul Han, Il-Youp Kwak

Big data have revolutionized the way data are processed and used across all fields. In the past, research was primarily conducted with a focus on hypothesis confirmation using sample data. However, in the era of big data, this has shifted to gaining insights from the collected data. Visualizing vast amounts of data to derive insights is crucial. For instance, leveraging big data for visualization can help identify and predict characteristics and patterns related to various infectious diseases. When data are presented in a visual format, patterns within the data become clear, making it easier to comprehend and provide deeper insights. This study aimed to comprehensively discuss data visualization and the various techniques used in the process. It also sought to enable researchers to directly use Python programs for data visualization. By providing practical visualization exercises on GitHub, this study aimed to facilitate their application in research endeavors.

大数据彻底改变了所有领域处理和使用数据的方式。过去,研究工作主要是利用样本数据进行假设确认。然而,在大数据时代,这已转变为从收集到的数据中获得洞察力。将海量数据可视化以获得洞察力至关重要。例如,利用大数据进行可视化有助于识别和预测与各种传染病相关的特征和模式。当数据以可视化的形式呈现时,数据中的模式就会变得清晰,从而更容易理解并提供更深入的见解。本研究旨在全面讨论数据可视化和在此过程中使用的各种技术。它还试图让研究人员能够直接使用 Python 程序进行数据可视化。通过在 GitHub 上提供实用的可视化练习,本研究旨在促进其在研究工作中的应用。
{"title":"Mastering data visualization with Python: practical tips for researchers.","authors":"Soyul Han, Il-Youp Kwak","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.167","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Big data have revolutionized the way data are processed and used across all fields. In the past, research was primarily conducted with a focus on hypothesis confirmation using sample data. However, in the era of big data, this has shifted to gaining insights from the collected data. Visualizing vast amounts of data to derive insights is crucial. For instance, leveraging big data for visualization can help identify and predict characteristics and patterns related to various infectious diseases. When data are presented in a visual format, patterns within the data become clear, making it easier to comprehend and provide deeper insights. This study aimed to comprehensively discuss data visualization and the various techniques used in the process. It also sought to enable researchers to directly use Python programs for data visualization. By providing practical visualization exercises on GitHub, this study aimed to facilitate their application in research endeavors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in India: a prospective observational study. 印度腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术围手术期并发症:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.190
Vikram Saini, Amrutha Varshini R, Yashwant Singh Rathore, Sunil Chumber, Kamal Kataria, Richa Garg

Purpose: These days laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, both totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), is a commonly performed procedure due to advancements in laparoscopic instruments and the availability of skilled laparoscopic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative complications of these two procedures.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study between July 2019 and December 2020. Perioperative complications were compared with a 6-month follow-up. It included 144 patients, of whom 71 underwent TAPP repair and 73 underwent TEP repair. The selection was based on the surgeon's choice.

Results: Early postoperative complications were scrotal edema (12 cases in TEP and 16 in TAPP), urinary retention (one case in TEP), ecchymosis (six cases in TEP and two in TAPP), and scrotal subcutaneous emphysema (two cases in TEP). On follow-up, seroma was found in a total of 22 cases, of which 12 were TEP and 10 were TAPP. While only one case of TAPP developed surgical site infection. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (p = 0.58). The pain scores significantly decreased throughout recovery and were comparable between the groups. Neither group experienced a recurrence during the 6-month follow-up. Fifty-eight patients developed Clavien-Dindo grade I complications, one had grade II, and three had grade IIIa complications.

Conclusion: With the increasing experience of the surgical fraternity in laparoscopic surgery, TEP and TAPP were proven to be comparable in terms of duration of surgery, postoperative complications, hospital stay, pain scores, and recurrence during the 6-month follow-up.

目的:如今,由于腹腔镜器械的进步和熟练的腹腔镜外科医生的出现,腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术(完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹膜前(TAPP))已成为一种常见的手术。本研究旨在比较这两种手术的围手术期并发症:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,研究时间为 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月。将围术期并发症与 6 个月的随访进行比较。研究纳入了 144 名患者,其中 71 人接受了 TAPP 修复术,73 人接受了 TEP 修复术。选择依据是外科医生的选择:术后早期并发症为阴囊水肿(TEP 12 例,TAPP 16 例)、尿潴留(TEP 1 例)、瘀斑(TEP 6 例,TAPP 2 例)和阴囊皮下气肿(TEP 2 例)。在随访中,共发现 22 例血清肿,其中 12 例为 TEP,10 例为 TAPP。只有一例 TAPP 出现了手术部位感染。两组患者的住院时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.58)。在整个恢复过程中,疼痛评分明显降低,两组之间不相上下。两组患者在 6 个月的随访中均未出现复发。58名患者出现了克拉维恩-丁多(Clavien-Dindo)I级并发症,1名患者出现了II级并发症,3名患者出现了IIIa级并发症:结论:随着外科医师在腹腔镜手术方面经验的增加,TEP和TAPP在手术时间、术后并发症、住院时间、疼痛评分和6个月随访期间的复发率方面被证明具有可比性。
{"title":"Perioperative complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in India: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Vikram Saini, Amrutha Varshini R, Yashwant Singh Rathore, Sunil Chumber, Kamal Kataria, Richa Garg","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.190","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>These days laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, both totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), is a commonly performed procedure due to advancements in laparoscopic instruments and the availability of skilled laparoscopic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative complications of these two procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study between July 2019 and December 2020. Perioperative complications were compared with a 6-month follow-up. It included 144 patients, of whom 71 underwent TAPP repair and 73 underwent TEP repair. The selection was based on the surgeon's choice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early postoperative complications were scrotal edema (12 cases in TEP and 16 in TAPP), urinary retention (one case in TEP), ecchymosis (six cases in TEP and two in TAPP), and scrotal subcutaneous emphysema (two cases in TEP). On follow-up, seroma was found in a total of 22 cases, of which 12 were TEP and 10 were TAPP. While only one case of TAPP developed surgical site infection. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.58). The pain scores significantly decreased throughout recovery and were comparable between the groups. Neither group experienced a recurrence during the 6-month follow-up. Fifty-eight patients developed Clavien-Dindo grade I complications, one had grade II, and three had grade IIIa complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the increasing experience of the surgical fraternity in laparoscopic surgery, TEP and TAPP were proven to be comparable in terms of duration of surgery, postoperative complications, hospital stay, pain scores, and recurrence during the 6-month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"190-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for gallstone and common bile duct stone in a patient with a left-sided gallbladder: a case report. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术治疗左侧胆囊患者的胆结石和胆总管结石:病例报告。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.218
Takeshi Ueda, Tetsuya Tanaka, Yuki Kirihataya, Chisato Hara, Atsushi Yoshimura

Left-sided gallbladder is a rare finding that is mostly discovered incidentally during surgery and is often associated with anatomic anomalies. We herein report a case in which laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration were achieved for an 89-year-old female patient with left-sided gallbladder. Surgery was carried out using our usual trocar position. Calot triangle was covered by the body of the gallbladder and could not be detected. We dissected the gallbladder from the fundus towards the neck. The cystic duct joined the common bile duct from the right side, and common bile duct exploration was performed routinely without perioperative comorbidities. Although the preoperative diagnosis rate is low and the risk of intraoperative bile duct injuries in patients with left-sided gallbladder is high, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration can be safely performed by understanding the location and bifurcation of the cystic duct.

左侧胆囊是一种罕见的发现,大多是在手术中偶然发现的,而且往往与解剖异常有关。我们在此报告一例腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术的病例,患者是一名 89 岁的女性,患有左侧胆囊。手术采用我们常用的套管位置。Calot 三角区被胆囊体覆盖,无法探测。我们从胆囊底向胆囊颈解剖胆囊。胆囊管从右侧汇入胆总管,胆总管探查术常规进行,围手术期无合并症。虽然左侧胆囊患者的术前诊断率较低,术中胆管损伤的风险较高,但通过了解胆囊管的位置和分叉情况,可以安全地进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术。
{"title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for gallstone and common bile duct stone in a patient with a left-sided gallbladder: a case report.","authors":"Takeshi Ueda, Tetsuya Tanaka, Yuki Kirihataya, Chisato Hara, Atsushi Yoshimura","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.218","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left-sided gallbladder is a rare finding that is mostly discovered incidentally during surgery and is often associated with anatomic anomalies. We herein report a case in which laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration were achieved for an 89-year-old female patient with left-sided gallbladder. Surgery was carried out using our usual trocar position. Calot triangle was covered by the body of the gallbladder and could not be detected. We dissected the gallbladder from the fundus towards the neck. The cystic duct joined the common bile duct from the right side, and common bile duct exploration was performed routinely without perioperative comorbidities. Although the preoperative diagnosis rate is low and the risk of intraoperative bile duct injuries in patients with left-sided gallbladder is high, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration can be safely performed by understanding the location and bifurcation of the cystic duct.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"218-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728684/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: a comprehensive analysis of current practices. 韩国的腹腔镜急诊手术:当前实践的综合分析。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176
Min Hyeong Jo, Heung-Kwon Oh
{"title":"Laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: a comprehensive analysis of current practices.","authors":"Min Hyeong Jo, Heung-Kwon Oh","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"176-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 机器人与腹腔镜再造减肥手术:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.198
Karim Ataya, Hussein El Bourji, Ayman Bsat, Amir Al Ayoubi, Al Moutuz Al Jaafreh, George Abi Saad

Purpose: In recent years, the need for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) procedures has experienced a noteworthy surge to confront complexities and weight recidivism. Despite being a subject of controversy for many, the utilization of the Da Vinci robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) may present benefits in RBS. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of robotic RBS in comparison to Laparoscopic RBS.

Methods: A meticulous and thorough analysis was ensured through a comprehensive exploration of the literature, which included PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. This exploration was conducted in adherence to the directives outlined in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.

Results: A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 55,889 in the laparoscopic group and 5,809 in the robotic group. No significant differences were observed in the leak, bleeding, operative time, or length of stay across both groups. However, the robotic group showed higher rates of conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.79; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%), reoperation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; p = 0.0009; I2 = 6%), and readmission (higher rate of readmission in the robotic group; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; p = 0.005; I2 = 30%).

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has no significant advantage over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Further research is warranted to explore and evaluate surgeons' methodology and proficiency differences.

目的:近年来,为应对复杂性和体重复发问题,减肥手术翻修(RBS)的需求显著增加。尽管很多人对达芬奇机器人平台(直觉外科公司)的使用存在争议,但它可能会给 RBS 带来益处。本研究旨在评估机器人 RBS 与腹腔镜 RBS 的效果对比:方法:通过对文献(包括PubMed、Medline、Scopus和Cochrane)的全面探索,确保进行细致而透彻的分析。这项研究遵循了 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)指南的要求。质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表:本次荟萃分析共纳入11项研究,其中腹腔镜组55889例,机器人组5809例。两组在漏血、出血、手术时间或住院时间方面均无明显差异。然而,机器人组显示出更高的转为开腹手术率(几率比 [OR],0.65;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.53-0.79;P < 0.0001;I2 = 0%)、再次手术率(OR,0.70;95% CI,0.57-0.87;P = 0.0009;I2 = 6%)、再入院(机器人组再入院率更高;OR,0.76;95% CI,0.62-0.92;P = 0.005;I2 = 30%):机器人辅助减肥手术与传统腹腔镜手术相比没有明显优势。结论:机器人辅助减重手术与传统腹腔镜手术相比没有明显优势,需要进一步研究和评估外科医生的方法和能力差异。
{"title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Karim Ataya, Hussein El Bourji, Ayman Bsat, Amir Al Ayoubi, Al Moutuz Al Jaafreh, George Abi Saad","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.198","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In recent years, the need for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) procedures has experienced a noteworthy surge to confront complexities and weight recidivism. Despite being a subject of controversy for many, the utilization of the Da Vinci robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) may present benefits in RBS. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of robotic RBS in comparison to Laparoscopic RBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meticulous and thorough analysis was ensured through a comprehensive exploration of the literature, which included PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. This exploration was conducted in adherence to the directives outlined in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 55,889 in the laparoscopic group and 5,809 in the robotic group. No significant differences were observed in the leak, bleeding, operative time, or length of stay across both groups. However, the robotic group showed higher rates of conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.79; <i>p</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), reoperation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; <i>p</i> = 0.0009; I<sup>2</sup> = 6%), and readmission (higher rate of readmission in the robotic group; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; <i>p</i> = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has no significant advantage over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Further research is warranted to explore and evaluate surgeons' methodology and proficiency differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"198-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728689/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simultaneous laparoscopic liver metastasectomy and intersphincteric resection for neuroendocrine tumor of the rectum by natural orifice specimen extraction surgery. 通过自然腔道标本提取手术同时进行腹腔镜直肠神经内分泌肿瘤肝转移切除术和括约肌间切除术
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.215
Mufaddal Kazi, Shraddha Patkar, Avanish Saklani

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are relatively uncommon rectal neoplasms, and the liver is the most common site of distant metastasis. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections by minimally invasive surgery and natural orifice specimen extraction are gaining popularity, reducing morbidity. We describe a case of rectal NET with liver metastasis operated simultaneously by laparoscopy with both specimens extracted via the anal canal. Transanal or transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for suitable cases is underutilized and only isolated case reports for simultaneous resections exist.

神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)是比较少见的直肠肿瘤,肝脏是最常见的远处转移部位。通过微创手术和自然腔道标本提取同时进行肝脏和结直肠切除术可降低发病率,因此越来越受到欢迎。我们描述了一例直肠NET伴肝转移的病例,该病例通过腹腔镜同时进行手术,经肛管提取两处标本。经肛门或经阴道自然腔道标本抽取手术在适合的病例中应用不足,目前仅有个别病例报告采用了同步切除术。
{"title":"Simultaneous laparoscopic liver metastasectomy and intersphincteric resection for neuroendocrine tumor of the rectum by natural orifice specimen extraction surgery.","authors":"Mufaddal Kazi, Shraddha Patkar, Avanish Saklani","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.215","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are relatively uncommon rectal neoplasms, and the liver is the most common site of distant metastasis. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections by minimally invasive surgery and natural orifice specimen extraction are gaining popularity, reducing morbidity. We describe a case of rectal NET with liver metastasis operated simultaneously by laparoscopy with both specimens extracted via the anal canal. Transanal or transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for suitable cases is underutilized and only isolated case reports for simultaneous resections exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"215-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138808149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancements and challenges in minimally invasive surgery training among general-surgery residents in Thailand. 泰国普外科住院医师微创手术培训的进步与挑战。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.178
Gyung Mo Son
{"title":"Advancements and challenges in minimally invasive surgery training among general-surgery residents in Thailand.","authors":"Gyung Mo Son","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.178","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"178-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138806902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. 使用达芬奇单孔系统进行腹部全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的初步经验。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208
Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee

From November 2021 to February 2022, 15 patients underwent total abdominal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. The clinical and pathological results were analyzed retrospectively. All surgeries were performed without conversion. The mean distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 10 cm (range, 2-15 cm). The mean operative time was 191 minutes, the median docking time was 4 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 20 mL (range, 20-50 mL). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.5, the mean distal resection margin was 3.52 cm, and all patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient had minor anastomotic leakage. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8 ± 2.5 days. Abdominal total mesorectal excision using the da Vinci single port system for rectal cancer is technically feasible and safe, with acceptable pathological and short-term clinical outcomes.

2021年11月至2022年2月,15名患者使用达芬奇单孔系统接受了直肠癌全腹腔系膜切除术。对临床和病理结果进行了回顾性分析。所有手术均未经转换。肿瘤到肛门边缘的平均距离为10厘米(2-15厘米)。平均手术时间为191分钟,中位对接时间为4分钟(2-10分钟不等),估计失血量为20毫升(20-50毫升不等)。切除的淋巴结平均数量为 16.5 个,远端切除边缘平均为 3.52 厘米,所有患者的周缘和远端切除边缘均无肿瘤。一名患者出现轻微吻合口漏。平均住院时间为(5.8 ± 2.5)天。使用达芬奇单孔系统进行腹部全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌在技术上是可行和安全的,其病理结果和短期临床结果均可接受。
{"title":"Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system.","authors":"Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From November 2021 to February 2022, 15 patients underwent total abdominal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. The clinical and pathological results were analyzed retrospectively. All surgeries were performed without conversion. The mean distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 10 cm (range, 2-15 cm). The mean operative time was 191 minutes, the median docking time was 4 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 20 mL (range, 20-50 mL). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.5, the mean distal resection margin was 3.52 cm, and all patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient had minor anastomotic leakage. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8 ± 2.5 days. Abdominal total mesorectal excision using the da Vinci single port system for rectal cancer is technically feasible and safe, with acceptable pathological and short-term clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728682/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis according to disease severity: single center retrospective study in Korea. 急性胆囊炎中根据病情严重程度采用单切口还是传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:韩国单中心回顾性研究。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180
Seung Jae Lee, Ju Ik Moon, Sang Eok Lee, Nak Song Sung, Seong Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Rho, Sung Gon Kim, Min Kyu Kim, Dae Sung Yoon, Won Jun Choi, In Seok Choi

Purpose: The safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) has not yet been confirmed.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC between April 2010 and December 2020. Propensity scores were used to match patients who underwent SILC with those who underwent conventional multiport LC (CMLC) in the entire cohort and in the two subgroups.

Results: A total of 1,876 patients underwent LC for AC, and 427 (22.8%) underwent SILC. In the propensity score-matched analysis of the entire cohort (404 patients in each group), the length of hospital stay (2.9 days vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.029) was shorter in the SILC group than in the CMLC group. No significant differences were observed in other surgical outcomes. In grade I AC (336 patients in each group), the SILC group showed poorer surgical outcomes than the CMLC group, regarding operation time (57.6 minutes vs. 52.4 minutes, p = 0.001) and estimated blood loss (22.9 mL vs. 13.1 mL, p = 0.006). In grade II/III AC (58 patients in each group), there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes between the two groups. Postoperative pain outcomes were also not significantly different in the two groups, regardless of severity.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SILC had similar surgical and pain outcomes to CMLC in patients with AC; however, subgroup analysis showed that SILC was associated with poor surgical outcomes than CMLC in grade I AC. Therefore, SILC should be carefully performed in patients with AC by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.

目的:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)治疗急性胆囊炎(AC)的安全性尚未得到证实:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年4月至2020年12月期间因急性胆囊炎接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者。在整个队列和两个亚组中,采用倾向评分对接受 SILC 和接受传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CMLC)的患者进行配对:共有 1,876 名患者因 AC 接受了 LC 治疗,其中 427 人(22.8%)接受了 SILC 治疗。在对整个队列(每组 404 名患者)进行倾向得分匹配分析时,SILC 组的住院时间(2.9 天 vs. 3.5 天,p = 0.029)短于 CMLC 组。其他手术结果无明显差异。在 I 级 AC(每组 336 例患者)中,SILC 组在手术时间(57.6 分钟对 52.4 分钟,p = 0.001)和估计失血量(22.9 毫升对 13.1 毫升,p = 0.006)方面的手术效果比 CMLC 组差。在 II/III 级 AC 中(每组 58 名患者),两组的手术效果无显著差异。无论严重程度如何,两组患者的术后疼痛结果也无明显差异:本研究表明,SILC 与 CMLC 对 AC 患者的手术和疼痛疗效相似;然而,亚组分析显示,在 I 级 AC 中,SILC 的手术疗效比 CMLC 差。因此,应由经验丰富的肝胆外科医生为 AC 患者谨慎实施 SILC。
{"title":"Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis according to disease severity: single center retrospective study in Korea.","authors":"Seung Jae Lee, Ju Ik Moon, Sang Eok Lee, Nak Song Sung, Seong Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Rho, Sung Gon Kim, Min Kyu Kim, Dae Sung Yoon, Won Jun Choi, In Seok Choi","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) has not yet been confirmed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC between April 2010 and December 2020. Propensity scores were used to match patients who underwent SILC with those who underwent conventional multiport LC (CMLC) in the entire cohort and in the two subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,876 patients underwent LC for AC, and 427 (22.8%) underwent SILC. In the propensity score-matched analysis of the entire cohort (404 patients in each group), the length of hospital stay (2.9 days vs. 3.5 days, <i>p</i> = 0.029) was shorter in the SILC group than in the CMLC group. No significant differences were observed in other surgical outcomes. In grade I AC (336 patients in each group), the SILC group showed poorer surgical outcomes than the CMLC group, regarding operation time (57.6 minutes vs. 52.4 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and estimated blood loss (22.9 mL vs. 13.1 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.006). In grade II/III AC (58 patients in each group), there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes between the two groups. Postoperative pain outcomes were also not significantly different in the two groups, regardless of severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that SILC had similar surgical and pain outcomes to CMLC in patients with AC; however, subgroup analysis showed that SILC was associated with poor surgical outcomes than CMLC in grade I AC. Therefore, SILC should be carefully performed in patients with AC by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138808298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of minimally invasive surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1