首页 > 最新文献

Journal of minimally invasive surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea. 机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的早期结果:韩国一项回顾性单机构研究。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128
Sungwoo Jung, Jin Ho Lee, Hyung Soon Lee

Purpose: Robotic hernia repair has increased in popularity since the introduction of da Vinci robots (Intuitive Surgical). However, we lack quantitative analyses of its potential benefits. Herein, we report our initial experience with robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients who underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair with a prosthetic mesh using the da Vinci platform. Data on patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were also collected.

Results: Twenty-one patients (including 20 male patients [95.2%]) with a mean age of 54.1 ±16.4 years and body mass index of 23.8 ± 1.9 kg/m2 underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Bilateral hernia repair was performed in two patients (9.5%), and six patients (28.5%) with scrotal hernia underwent R-TAPP hernia repair. A sigmoid colon sliding hernia was present in three patients (14.3%). The mean operation and console times were 91.8 ± 20.4 minutes and 154.5 ± 26.2 minutes, and 61.4 ± 16.9 minutes and 128.0 ± 25.5 minutes for unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia, respectively. Spermatic vessel injury was identified intraoperatively in one patient. Two minor postoperative complications, postoperative ileus, and wound seroma were reported. The mean duration of hospitalization was 3.8 ± 0.9 days. No recurrence or conversion to open surgery was required.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible. Its cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for a robotic approach require further investigation.

目的:自从达芬奇机器人(Intuitive Surgical)问世以来,机器人疝气修补术越来越受欢迎。然而,我们缺乏对其潜在好处的定量分析。在此,我们报告了机器人经腹腹膜前疝修补术(R-TAPP)的初步经验。方法:我们回顾性回顾了使用达芬奇平台进行R-TAPP腹股沟疝修复术的患者的数据。还收集了患者特征和手术结果的数据。结果:21例患者(其中男性20例[95.2%])行R-TAPP腹股沟疝修补术,平均年龄54.1±16.4岁,体重指数23.8±1.9 kg/m2。2例(9.5%)行双侧疝修补术,6例(28.5%)阴囊疝行R-TAPP疝修补术。乙状结肠滑动疝3例(14.3%)。单侧腹股沟疝和双侧腹股沟疝的平均手术时间分别为91.8±20.4分钟和154.5±26.2分钟,分别为61.4±16.9分钟和128.0±25.5分钟。术中发现1例患者精管损伤。术后2例轻微并发症,术后肠梗阻和伤口血肿。平均住院时间为3.8±0.9 d。无复发或需转开手术。结论:R-TAPP修补腹股沟疝是安全可行的。其成本效益、最佳程序步骤和机器人方法的适应症需要进一步研究。
{"title":"Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.","authors":"Sungwoo Jung,&nbsp;Jin Ho Lee,&nbsp;Hyung Soon Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic hernia repair has increased in popularity since the introduction of da Vinci robots (Intuitive Surgical). However, we lack quantitative analyses of its potential benefits. Herein, we report our initial experience with robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients who underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair with a prosthetic mesh using the da Vinci platform. Data on patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients (including 20 male patients [95.2%]) with a mean age of 54.1 ±16.4 years and body mass index of 23.8 ± 1.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Bilateral hernia repair was performed in two patients (9.5%), and six patients (28.5%) with scrotal hernia underwent R-TAPP hernia repair. A sigmoid colon sliding hernia was present in three patients (14.3%). The mean operation and console times were 91.8 ± 20.4 minutes and 154.5 ± 26.2 minutes, and 61.4 ± 16.9 minutes and 128.0 ± 25.5 minutes for unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia, respectively. Spermatic vessel injury was identified intraoperatively in one patient. Two minor postoperative complications, postoperative ileus, and wound seroma were reported. The mean duration of hospitalization was 3.8 ± 0.9 days. No recurrence or conversion to open surgery was required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible. Its cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for a robotic approach require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"128-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/b2/jmis-26-3-128.PMC10505366.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10305823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Directed acyclic graphs for clinical research: a tutorial. 临床研究的有向无环图:教程。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.97
Sangmin Byeon, Woojoo Lee

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are useful tools for visualizing the hypothesized causal structures in an intuitive way and selecting relevant confounders in causal inference. However, in spite of their increasing use in clinical and surgical research, the causal graphs might also be misused by a lack of understanding of the central principles. In this article, we aim to introduce the basic terminology and fundamental rules of DAGs, and DAGitty, a user-friendly program that easily displays DAGs. Specifically, we describe how to determine variables that should or should not be adjusted based on the backdoor criterion with examples. In addition, the occurrence of the various types of biases is discussed with caveats, including the problem caused by the traditional approach using p-values for confounder selection. Moreover, a detailed guide to DAGitty is provided with practical examples regarding minimally invasive surgery. Essentially, the primary benefit of DAGs is to aid researchers in clarifying the research questions and the corresponding designs based on the domain knowledge. With these strengths, we propose that the use of DAGs may contribute to rigorous research designs, and lead to transparency and reproducibility in research on minimally invasive surgery.

有向无环图(dag)是直观显示假设因果结构和在因果推理中选择相关混杂因素的有用工具。然而,尽管它们在临床和外科研究中的应用越来越多,但由于缺乏对中心原则的理解,因果图也可能被滥用。在本文中,我们旨在介绍dag的基本术语和基本规则,以及DAGitty,这是一个易于显示dag的用户友好程序。具体来说,我们用实例描述了如何根据后门准则确定应该或不应该调整的变量。此外,还讨论了各种类型偏差的发生,并提出了一些警告,包括使用p值进行混杂选择的传统方法所引起的问题。此外,还提供了关于微创手术的实际例子的详细指南。从本质上讲,dag的主要好处是帮助研究人员澄清研究问题,并根据领域知识进行相应的设计。鉴于这些优势,我们建议使用dag可能有助于严格的研究设计,并导致微创手术研究的透明度和可重复性。
{"title":"Directed acyclic graphs for clinical research: a tutorial.","authors":"Sangmin Byeon,&nbsp;Woojoo Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.97","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.97","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are useful tools for visualizing the hypothesized causal structures in an intuitive way and selecting relevant confounders in causal inference. However, in spite of their increasing use in clinical and surgical research, the causal graphs might also be misused by a lack of understanding of the central principles. In this article, we aim to introduce the basic terminology and fundamental rules of DAGs, and DAGitty, a user-friendly program that easily displays DAGs. Specifically, we describe how to determine variables that should or should not be adjusted based on the backdoor criterion with examples. In addition, the occurrence of the various types of biases is discussed with caveats, including the problem caused by the traditional approach using <i>p</i>-values for confounder selection. Moreover, a detailed guide to DAGitty is provided with practical examples regarding minimally invasive surgery. Essentially, the primary benefit of DAGs is to aid researchers in clarifying the research questions and the corresponding designs based on the domain knowledge. With these strengths, we propose that the use of DAGs may contribute to rigorous research designs, and lead to transparency and reproducibility in research on minimally invasive surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/93/jmis-26-3-97.PMC10505364.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic multiple sigmoid and rectal mucosa skinning in a multicentric deep infiltrating bowel endometriotic nodules: a case report. 机器人多重乙状结肠和直肠粘膜皮肤在多中心深浸润性肠子宫内膜异位结节:1例报告。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.146
Giorgia Gaia, Margarita Afonina, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Giampaolo Formisano, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Anna Maria Marconi

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disease characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus. The eradication of non-gynecological localizations represents the real surgical challenge. A 29-year-old woman underwent robotic surgery with the Da Vinci system (Intuitive Surgical Inc.) for a diagnosis of stage IV deep endometriosis. The patient presented with 5 cm left ovarian endometrioma, an infiltration of the left posterior parametrium, and bilateral ureteral endometriosis. Once inside the pelvic cavity, deep intestinal infiltrating endometriosis implants were confirmed as triple, multicentric, and multifocal lesions, affected distal sigmoid, rectosigmoid junction, and upper rectum. An expert multiple excision, sparing the intestinal mucosa, was performed. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a multiple robotic shaving of multicentric endometriotic intestinal lesions. After the surgery, a normal diet was quickly restored, accelerating the recovery of the physiological peristalsis and the overall recovery time.

子宫内膜异位症是一种良性妇科疾病,其特征是子宫外存在子宫内膜组织。根除非妇科定位是真正的外科挑战。一名29岁的女性接受了达芬奇系统(Intuitive Surgical Inc.)的机器人手术,诊断为IV期深部子宫内膜异位症。患者表现为左侧卵巢5厘米子宫内膜瘤,左侧后参数浸润,双侧输尿管子宫内膜异位症。一旦进入盆腔,深肠浸润性子宫内膜异位症植入物被证实为三重、多中心、多灶病变,影响远端乙状结肠、直肠乙状结肠结和上直肠。专家多次切除,保留肠黏膜,进行。据我们所知,这是第一次描述多中心子宫内膜异位症肠道病变的多个机器人剃须。术后迅速恢复正常饮食,加快了生理蠕动的恢复和整体恢复时间。
{"title":"Robotic multiple sigmoid and rectal mucosa skinning in a multicentric deep infiltrating bowel endometriotic nodules: a case report.","authors":"Giorgia Gaia,&nbsp;Margarita Afonina,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Sighinolfi,&nbsp;Giampaolo Formisano,&nbsp;Paolo Pietro Bianchi,&nbsp;Anna Maria Marconi","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disease characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus. The eradication of non-gynecological localizations represents the real surgical challenge. A 29-year-old woman underwent robotic surgery with the Da Vinci system (Intuitive Surgical Inc.) for a diagnosis of stage IV deep endometriosis. The patient presented with 5 cm left ovarian endometrioma, an infiltration of the left posterior parametrium, and bilateral ureteral endometriosis. Once inside the pelvic cavity, deep intestinal infiltrating endometriosis implants were confirmed as triple, multicentric, and multifocal lesions, affected distal sigmoid, rectosigmoid junction, and upper rectum. An expert multiple excision, sparing the intestinal mucosa, was performed. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a multiple robotic shaving of multicentric endometriotic intestinal lesions. After the surgery, a normal diet was quickly restored, accelerating the recovery of the physiological peristalsis and the overall recovery time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"146-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/14/jmis-26-3-146.PMC10505363.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜食管旁疝修复:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.134
Symeonidou Elissavet, Gkoutziotis Ioannis, Petras Panagiotis, Mpallas Konstantinos, Kamparoudis Apostolos

Purpose: The robotic approach offers improved visualization and maneuverability for surgeons. This systematic review aims to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair, specifically examining postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and recurrence.

Methods: A systematic review including thorough research through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane, was performed and only comparative studies were included. Studies concerning other types of hiatal hernias or children were excluded. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare overall postoperative complications, hospital stay, and operation time.

Results: Ten comparative studies, with 186,259 participants in total, were included in the meta-analysis, but unfortunately, not all of them reported all the outcomes under question. It appeared that there is no statistically significant difference between the conventional laparoscopic and the robotic-assisted approach, regarding the overall postoperative complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-1.11), the mean operation time (t = 1.41; 95% CI, -0.15-0.52; p = 0.22), and the hospital length of stay (t = -1.54; degree of freedom = 8; 95% CI, -0.53-0.11; p = 0.16). Only two studies reported evidence concerning the recurrence rates.

Conclusion: Overall, the robotic-assisted method did not demonstrate superiority over conventional laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair in terms of postoperative complications, operation time, or hospital stay. However, some studies focused on cost and patient characteristics of each group. Further comparative and randomized control studies with longer follow-up periods are needed for more accurate conclusions on short- and long-term outcomes.

目的:机器人入路为外科医生提供了更好的可视化和可操作性。本系统综述旨在比较机器人辅助和传统腹腔镜下食管旁疝修补的结果,特别是检查术后并发症、手术时间、住院时间和复发。方法:通过PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane进行系统综述,仅纳入比较研究。排除了其他类型的裂孔疝或儿童的研究。进行了一项荟萃分析,比较总体术后并发症、住院时间和手术时间。结果:荟萃分析纳入了10项比较研究,共186259名参与者,但不幸的是,并非所有研究都报告了所讨论的所有结果。在总体术后并发症发生率(优势比[OR]为0.56,95%可信区间[CI]为0.28-1.11)、平均手术时间(t = 1.41;95% ci, -0.15-0.52;P = 0.22)、住院时间(t = -1.54;自由度= 8;95% ci, -0.53-0.11;P = 0.16)。只有两项研究报告了有关复发率的证据。结论:总体而言,机器人辅助方法在术后并发症、手术时间或住院时间方面没有表现出优于传统腹腔镜食管旁裂孔疝修补术的优势。然而,一些研究侧重于每组的成本和患者特征。需要进行更长的随访期的进一步比较和随机对照研究,以获得更准确的短期和长期结果结论。
{"title":"Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Symeonidou Elissavet,&nbsp;Gkoutziotis Ioannis,&nbsp;Petras Panagiotis,&nbsp;Mpallas Konstantinos,&nbsp;Kamparoudis Apostolos","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The robotic approach offers improved visualization and maneuverability for surgeons. This systematic review aims to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair, specifically examining postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review including thorough research through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane, was performed and only comparative studies were included. Studies concerning other types of hiatal hernias or children were excluded. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare overall postoperative complications, hospital stay, and operation time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten comparative studies, with 186,259 participants in total, were included in the meta-analysis, but unfortunately, not all of them reported all the outcomes under question. It appeared that there is no statistically significant difference between the conventional laparoscopic and the robotic-assisted approach, regarding the overall postoperative complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-1.11), the mean operation time (t = 1.41; 95% CI, -0.15-0.52; <i>p</i> = 0.22), and the hospital length of stay (t = -1.54; degree of freedom = 8; 95% CI, -0.53-0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.16). Only two studies reported evidence concerning the recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the robotic-assisted method did not demonstrate superiority over conventional laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair in terms of postoperative complications, operation time, or hospital stay. However, some studies focused on cost and patient characteristics of each group. Further comparative and randomized control studies with longer follow-up periods are needed for more accurate conclusions on short- and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"134-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/59/a5/jmis-26-3-134.PMC10505365.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10306678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The feasibility of robotic inguinal henia repair in Korea. 机器人腹股沟疝修补术在韩国的可行性。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.108
Sung Il Choi
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a standard surgical procedure in Korea and worldwide. In the early 1990s, laparoscopic surgery with various types of mesh in the preperitoneal space was introduced [1]. The benefits of this minimally invasive surgery include reduced wound complications, shorter hospital stays, less reported pain, and earlier functional recovery [2,3]. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches are representative procedures of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias and have been endorsed in minimally invasive hernia repairs [4,5]. Despite these advantages and published guidelines, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgeries have plateaued, with the number of cases remaining flat for years [6]. Some surgeons have not adopted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair as their procedure of choice. Reasons include the learning curve required for the advanced laparoscopic technique and the different surgical anatomy compared to open hernia repairs. The peritoneal closure suture technique is also more difficult in the TAPP procedures. Robotic technology offers enhanced visualization and superior dexterity and precision, like wristed instruments for performing minimally invasive operations [7]. In Korea, the performance of robotic inguinal hernia repairs began just a few years ago. A relatively small number of patients have been studied, and there is a debate about the feasibility and advantages of robotic inguinal hernia repair. In this article, Jung et al. [8] showed acceptable short-term results in terms of postoperative complications. However, operation times were longer than open or laparoscopic surgery, and no information was gathered about postoperative pain scores, hospital costs, or patient satisfaction [8]. Khoraki et al. [9] published hospital costs comparing laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia surgery. They concluded that the hospital costs of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs were significantly higher than those of robotic inguinal hernia repairs. A large prospective randomized study comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgery is needed to determine the feasibility, patients’ satisfaction, surgeons’ satisfaction, safety, and hernia recurrence of both techniques.
{"title":"The feasibility of robotic inguinal henia repair in Korea.","authors":"Sung Il Choi","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.108","url":null,"abstract":"Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a standard surgical procedure in Korea and worldwide. In the early 1990s, laparoscopic surgery with various types of mesh in the preperitoneal space was introduced [1]. The benefits of this minimally invasive surgery include reduced wound complications, shorter hospital stays, less reported pain, and earlier functional recovery [2,3]. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches are representative procedures of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias and have been endorsed in minimally invasive hernia repairs [4,5]. Despite these advantages and published guidelines, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgeries have plateaued, with the number of cases remaining flat for years [6]. Some surgeons have not adopted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair as their procedure of choice. Reasons include the learning curve required for the advanced laparoscopic technique and the different surgical anatomy compared to open hernia repairs. The peritoneal closure suture technique is also more difficult in the TAPP procedures. Robotic technology offers enhanced visualization and superior dexterity and precision, like wristed instruments for performing minimally invasive operations [7]. In Korea, the performance of robotic inguinal hernia repairs began just a few years ago. A relatively small number of patients have been studied, and there is a debate about the feasibility and advantages of robotic inguinal hernia repair. In this article, Jung et al. [8] showed acceptable short-term results in terms of postoperative complications. However, operation times were longer than open or laparoscopic surgery, and no information was gathered about postoperative pain scores, hospital costs, or patient satisfaction [8]. Khoraki et al. [9] published hospital costs comparing laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia surgery. They concluded that the hospital costs of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs were significantly higher than those of robotic inguinal hernia repairs. A large prospective randomized study comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgery is needed to determine the feasibility, patients’ satisfaction, surgeons’ satisfaction, safety, and hernia recurrence of both techniques.","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"108-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/6a/jmis-26-3-108.PMC10505361.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10305824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic central pancreatectomy: a surgical technique. 机器人中央胰腺切除术:一种外科技术。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.155
Eui Hyuk Chong, Jae Young Jang, Sung Hoon Choi

Robotic central pancreatectomy has not been widely performed because of its rare indications, technical difficulties, and concern about the high complication rate. We reviewed six robotic central pancreatectomy cases between May 2016 and June 2021 at a single institution. This multimedia article aims to introduce our technique of robotic central pancreatectomy with perioperative and follow-up outcomes. All patients experienced biochemical leakage of postoperative pancreatic fistula, except in one with a grade B pancreatic fistula, which resulted in a pseudocyst formation and was successfully managed by endoscopic internal drainage. All patients achieved completely negative resection margins. There was no new-onset diabetes mellitus or recurrence during the median follow-up period of 13.5 months (range, 10-74 months). With an acceptable complication rate and the preservation of pancreatic function, robotic central pancreatectomy could be a good surgical option for patients with benign and borderline malignant tumors of the pancreatic neck or proximal body.

机器人中央胰腺切除术由于其适应症罕见、技术困难和并发症发生率高而尚未广泛应用。我们回顾了2016年5月至2021年6月在同一机构进行的6例机器人中央胰腺切除术。这篇多媒体文章旨在介绍我们的机器人中央胰腺切除术技术及其围手术期和随访结果。除1例B级胰瘘患者外,所有患者均出现术后胰瘘生化渗漏,导致假性囊肿形成,经内镜内引流成功处理。所有患者切除边缘完全阴性。中位随访时间为13.5个月(10-74个月),无新发糖尿病或复发。由于并发症发生率可接受且能保留胰腺功能,机器人胰腺中央切除术可能是胰腺颈部或近端良性和交界性恶性肿瘤患者的良好手术选择。
{"title":"Robotic central pancreatectomy: a surgical technique.","authors":"Eui Hyuk Chong,&nbsp;Jae Young Jang,&nbsp;Sung Hoon Choi","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic central pancreatectomy has not been widely performed because of its rare indications, technical difficulties, and concern about the high complication rate. We reviewed six robotic central pancreatectomy cases between May 2016 and June 2021 at a single institution. This multimedia article aims to introduce our technique of robotic central pancreatectomy with perioperative and follow-up outcomes. All patients experienced biochemical leakage of postoperative pancreatic fistula, except in one with a grade B pancreatic fistula, which resulted in a pseudocyst formation and was successfully managed by endoscopic internal drainage. All patients achieved completely negative resection margins. There was no new-onset diabetes mellitus or recurrence during the median follow-up period of 13.5 months (range, 10-74 months). With an acceptable complication rate and the preservation of pancreatic function, robotic central pancreatectomy could be a good surgical option for patients with benign and borderline malignant tumors of the pancreatic neck or proximal body.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/df/jmis-26-3-155.PMC10505369.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10307023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open injury, robotic repair-moving ahead! Total robotic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for post-open cholecystectomy Bismuth type 2 biliary stricture using indocyanine green dye. 开放性损伤,机器人修复,继续前进!全机器人Roux-en-Y肝-肠吻合术治疗胆囊切除术后2型胆道狭窄。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.151
Kaushal Singh Rathore, Peeyush Varshney, Subhash Chandra Soni, Vaibhav Kumar Varshney, Selvakumar B, Lokesh Agarwal, Chhagan Lal Birda

Hepaticojejunostomy is currently the best treatment for post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures. Laparoscopic repair has not gained popularity due to difficult reconstruction. We present case of 43-year-old-female with Bismuth type 2 stricture following laparoscopic converted open cholecystectomy with bile duct injury done elsewhere. Position was modified Llyod-Davis position and four 8-mm robotic ports (including camera) and 12-mm assistant port were placed. The procedure included noticeable steps such as adhesiolysis, identification of gallbladder fossa, identification of common hepatic duct, lowering of hilar plate etc. Operating and console time were 420 and 350 minutes and blood loss was 100 mL. Patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. Robotic repair (hepaticojejunostomy) of biliary tract stricture after cholecystectomy is safe and feasible with good outcomes.

肝空肠吻合术是目前治疗胆囊切除术后胆道狭窄的最佳方法。由于重建困难,腹腔镜修复尚未普及。我们报告一例43岁女性在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后出现Bismuth 2型狭窄,并在其他地方造成胆管损伤。位置修改为lloyd - davis位置,放置4个8mm机器人端口(包括摄像机)和12mm辅助端口。手术步骤包括粘连松解、胆囊窝识别、肝总管识别、肝门板降低等。手术时间420分钟,坐台时间350分钟,出血量100 mL,术后第4天出院。胆囊切除术后胆道狭窄机器人修复(肝空肠吻合术)安全可行,效果良好。
{"title":"Open injury, robotic repair-moving ahead! Total robotic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for post-open cholecystectomy Bismuth type 2 biliary stricture using indocyanine green dye.","authors":"Kaushal Singh Rathore,&nbsp;Peeyush Varshney,&nbsp;Subhash Chandra Soni,&nbsp;Vaibhav Kumar Varshney,&nbsp;Selvakumar B,&nbsp;Lokesh Agarwal,&nbsp;Chhagan Lal Birda","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepaticojejunostomy is currently the best treatment for post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures. Laparoscopic repair has not gained popularity due to difficult reconstruction. We present case of 43-year-old-female with Bismuth type 2 stricture following laparoscopic converted open cholecystectomy with bile duct injury done elsewhere. Position was modified Llyod-Davis position and four 8-mm robotic ports (including camera) and 12-mm assistant port were placed. The procedure included noticeable steps such as adhesiolysis, identification of gallbladder fossa, identification of common hepatic duct, lowering of hilar plate etc. Operating and console time were 420 and 350 minutes and blood loss was 100 mL. Patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. Robotic repair (hepaticojejunostomy) of biliary tract stricture after cholecystectomy is safe and feasible with good outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"151-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/b4/jmis-26-3-151.PMC10505368.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trend of minimally invasive and open surgery experience of general surgery residents: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case log in Thailand. 普外科住院医师微创和开放手术经验趋势:泰国研究生医学教育认证委员会普外科病例记录。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.121
Chalerm Eurboonyanun, Potchavit Aphinives, Jakrapan Wittayapairoch, Kulyada Eurboonyanun, Tharatip Srisuk, Suriya Punchai, Somchai Ruangwannasak, Kriangsak Jenwitheesuk, Emil Petrusa, Denise Gee, Roy Phitayakorn

Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers patients several benefits, such as smaller incisions, and fast recovery times. General surgery residents should be trained in both open and MIS. We aimed to examine the trends of minimally invasive and open procedures performed by general surgery residents in Thailand.

Methods: A retrospective review of the Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case logs from 2007 to 2018 was performed for common open and laparoscopic general surgery operations. The data were grouped by three time periods, which were 2007-2010, 2011-2014, and 2015-2018, and analyzed to explore changes in the operative trends.

Results: For Thai residents, the mean number of laparoscopic operations per person per year increased from 5.97 to 9.36 (56.78% increase) and open increased from 20.02 to 27.16 (35.67% increase). There was a significant increase in the average number of minimally invasive procedures performed among cholecystectomy (5.83, 6.57, 8.10; p < 0.001) and inguinal hernia repair (0.33, 0.35, 0.66; p < 0.001). Compared to general surgery residents in the United States, Thai residents had more experience with open appendectomy, but significantly less experience with all other operations/procedures.

Conclusion: The number of open and minimally invasive procedures performed or assisted by Thai general surgery residents has slowly increased, but generally lags behind residents in the United States. The Thai education program must be updated to improve residents' technical skills in open and laparoscopic surgery to remain competitive with their global partners.

目的:微创手术(MIS)为患者提供了一些好处,如更小的切口和更快的恢复时间。普外科住院医师应接受开放式和MIS两方面的培训。我们的目的是研究泰国普通外科住院医师进行微创和开放手术的趋势。方法:回顾性分析泰国皇家外科学院和研究生医学教育认证委员会2007年至2018年普通外科手术的病例日志。将数据按2007-2010年、2011-2014年、2015-2018年三个时间段进行分组分析,探讨手术趋势变化。结果:泰国居民平均每年腹腔镜手术次数从5.97次增加到9.36次(增加56.78%),开腹次数从20.02次增加到27.16次(增加35.67%)。在胆囊切除术中,微创手术的平均次数显著增加(5.83,6.57,8.10;P < 0.001)和腹股沟疝修补术(0.33,0.35,0.66;P < 0.001)。与美国的普通外科住院医生相比,泰国住院医生在开放性阑尾切除术方面有更多的经验,但在所有其他手术/程序方面的经验明显较少。结论:泰国普外科住院医师实施或协助的开放微创手术数量缓慢增加,但总体上落后于美国住院医师。泰国的教育项目必须更新,以提高住院医生在开放手术和腹腔镜手术方面的技术技能,以保持与全球合作伙伴的竞争力。
{"title":"Trend of minimally invasive and open surgery experience of general surgery residents: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case log in Thailand.","authors":"Chalerm Eurboonyanun,&nbsp;Potchavit Aphinives,&nbsp;Jakrapan Wittayapairoch,&nbsp;Kulyada Eurboonyanun,&nbsp;Tharatip Srisuk,&nbsp;Suriya Punchai,&nbsp;Somchai Ruangwannasak,&nbsp;Kriangsak Jenwitheesuk,&nbsp;Emil Petrusa,&nbsp;Denise Gee,&nbsp;Roy Phitayakorn","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers patients several benefits, such as smaller incisions, and fast recovery times. General surgery residents should be trained in both open and MIS. We aimed to examine the trends of minimally invasive and open procedures performed by general surgery residents in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of the Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case logs from 2007 to 2018 was performed for common open and laparoscopic general surgery operations. The data were grouped by three time periods, which were 2007-2010, 2011-2014, and 2015-2018, and analyzed to explore changes in the operative trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Thai residents, the mean number of laparoscopic operations per person per year increased from 5.97 to 9.36 (56.78% increase) and open increased from 20.02 to 27.16 (35.67% increase). There was a significant increase in the average number of minimally invasive procedures performed among cholecystectomy (5.83, 6.57, 8.10; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and inguinal hernia repair (0.33, 0.35, 0.66; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to general surgery residents in the United States, Thai residents had more experience with open appendectomy, but significantly less experience with all other operations/procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of open and minimally invasive procedures performed or assisted by Thai general surgery residents has slowly increased, but generally lags behind residents in the United States. The Thai education program must be updated to improve residents' technical skills in open and laparoscopic surgery to remain competitive with their global partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/32/jmis-26-3-121.PMC10505362.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is the role of surgical oncologist in the treatment of gastric cancer? 肿瘤外科医生在胃癌治疗中的作用是什么?
Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.47
Jeong Ho Song, Sang-Yong Son, Sang-Uk Han

Surgical oncologist plays a pivotal role in treating patients with cancer in the era of precision medicine. In this article, we summarized traditional roles of surgical oncologists and suggested further additional ones for the modern day in the multidisciplinary approach to gastric cancer treatment.

在精准医疗时代,外科肿瘤学家在治疗癌症患者中起着举足轻重的作用。在这篇文章中,我们总结了外科肿瘤学家的传统角色,并提出了在现代胃癌多学科治疗方法中进一步增加的角色。
{"title":"What is the role of surgical oncologist in the treatment of gastric cancer?","authors":"Jeong Ho Song,&nbsp;Sang-Yong Son,&nbsp;Sang-Uk Han","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.47","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical oncologist plays a pivotal role in treating patients with cancer in the era of precision medicine. In this article, we summarized traditional roles of surgical oncologists and suggested further additional ones for the modern day in the multidisciplinary approach to gastric cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 2","pages":"47-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/9a/jmis-26-2-47.PMC10280105.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9766182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic approach in complex ventral hernias: anterior component separation technique. 复杂腹疝的机器人入路:前成分分离技术。
Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.88
Raquel Nogueira, Diego Laurentino Lima, Eduardo ParraDavila, Flavio Malcher
Open onlay ventral hernia repair is still one of the most-used surgical techniques for the repair of hernias worldwide. The robotic anterior component separation technique uses the surgeon’s usual anatomical expertise on onlay mesh placement with the manipulation and advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It maintains the precepts of reestablishment the midline integrity and insertion of mesh in the preaponeurotic space, without contact with the viscera. The use of this technique is simple and quite reproducible if you compare it with other techniques. Also, the time spent in surgery does not last long.
开放式腹疝修补术是目前世界范围内最常用的腹疝修补术之一。机器人前假体分离技术利用了外科医生通常的解剖学专业知识,具有微创手术的操作和优势。它保持了重建中线完整性和将网片插入腱膜前间隙的原则,而不与内脏接触。如果与其他技术比较,这种技术的使用很简单,而且很容易重复。而且,手术时间也不会持续太久。
{"title":"Robotic approach in complex ventral hernias: anterior component separation technique.","authors":"Raquel Nogueira,&nbsp;Diego Laurentino Lima,&nbsp;Eduardo ParraDavila,&nbsp;Flavio Malcher","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.88","url":null,"abstract":"Open onlay ventral hernia repair is still one of the most-used surgical techniques for the repair of hernias worldwide. The robotic anterior component separation technique uses the surgeon’s usual anatomical expertise on onlay mesh placement with the manipulation and advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It maintains the precepts of reestablishment the midline integrity and insertion of mesh in the preaponeurotic space, without contact with the viscera. The use of this technique is simple and quite reproducible if you compare it with other techniques. Also, the time spent in surgery does not last long.","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 2","pages":"88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/f2/jmis-26-2-88.PMC10280109.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10088506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of minimally invasive surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1