首页 > 最新文献

Advances in Radiation Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of Clinical Factors on 18F-Flotufolastat Detection Rates in Men With Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of the Phase 3 SPOTLIGHT Study 临床因素对复发性前列腺癌男性患者中18F-氟夫司他检出率的影响:SPOTLIGHT研究3期的探索性分析
IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101532

Purpose

18F-Flotufolastat (18F-rhPSMA-7.3) is a newly approved prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting radiopharmaceutical for diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer (PCa). SPOTLIGHT (National Clinical Trials 04186845) evaluated 18F-flotufolastat in men with suspected PCa recurrence. Here, we present results of predefined exploratory endpoints from SPOTLIGHT to evaluate the impact of clinical factors on 18F-flotufolastat detection rates (DR).

Methods and Materials

The impact of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA doubling time (PSAdt), and International Society of Urologic Pathology Grade Group (GG) on 18F-flotufolastat DR was evaluated among all SPOTLIGHT patients with an evaluable scan, with DR stratified according to the patients’ prior treatment (radical prostatectomy ± radiation therapy [RP] or radiation therapy only [RT]). The patients underwent positron emission tomography 50 to 70 minutes after receiving 18F-flotufolastat (296 MBq IV), and scans were read by 3 blinded central readers, with the majority read representing agreement between ≥2 readers.

Results

In total, 389 men (median PSA: 1.10 ng/mL) were evaluable. By majority read, 18F-flotufolastat identified distant lesions in 39% and 43% of patients treated with prior RP or RT, respectively. The overall DR broadly increased with increasing PSA (<0.2 ng/mL: 33%; ≥10 ng/mL: 100%). Among patients with PSA <1 ng/mL, 68% had positive scans, and 27% had extrapelvic findings. PSAdt was available for 145/389 (37%) patients. PSAdt did not appear to influence 18F-flotufolastat DR (77%-90% across all PSAdt categories). Among patients with prior RP, DR ranged from 70% to 83% across PSAdt categories, and 100% DR was reported for all post-RT patients. In total, 362/389 (93%) patients had baseline GG data. Overall DRs were uniformly high (75%‒95%) across all GG. When stratified by prior treatment, DRs across all GG were 69% to 89% in patients with prior RP and ≥96% in patients with prior RT.

Conclusions

18F-Flotufolastat-positron emission tomography enabled the accurate detection of recurrent PCa lesions across a wide range of PSA, PSAdt, and International Society of Urologic Pathology GG, thus supporting its clinical utility for a broad range of patients with recurrent PCa.

目的18F-氟磷灰石(18F-rhPSMA-7.3)是一种新批准的前列腺特异性膜抗原靶向放射性药物,用于前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断成像。SPOTLIGHT(国家临床试验 04186845)对疑似 PCa 复发的男性进行了 18F-flotufolastat 评估。在此,我们展示了 SPOTLIGHT 预先确定的探索性终点结果,以评估临床因素对 18F-flotufolastat 检出率 (DR) 的影响。基线前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、PSA倍增时间(PSAdt)和国际泌尿病理学会分级组(GG)对18F-氟睾酮检出率的影响在所有进行了可评估扫描的SPOTLIGHT患者中进行了评估,根据患者之前的治疗(根治性前列腺切除术±放疗[RP]或仅放疗[RT])对检出率进行了分层。患者在接受 18F-flotufolastat (296 MBq IV)治疗后 50 至 70 分钟接受正电子发射断层扫描,扫描结果由 3 位盲人中心阅片员读取,多数阅片员读取结果代表≥2 位阅片员的一致意见。通过多数读数,18F-flotufolastat分别在39%和43%接受过RP或RT治疗的患者中发现了远处病灶。随着PSA的增加,总体DR广泛增加(<0.2纳克/毫升:33%;≥10纳克/毫升:100%)。在 PSA≥1 纳克/毫升的患者中,68% 的患者扫描结果呈阳性,27% 的患者有盆腔外发现。145/389(37%)名患者可获得 PSAdt。PSAdt 似乎不会影响 18F-flotufolastat DR(在所有 PSAdt 类别中为 77%-90%)。在先行 RP 的患者中,不同 PSAdt 类别的 DR 为 70% 至 83%,所有 RT 后患者的 DR 均为 100%。共有 362/389 例(93%)患者有基线 GG 数据。所有 GG 的总体 DR 都很高(75%-95%)。结论18F-氟磷灰石正电子发射断层扫描能在广泛的 PSA、PSAdt 和国际泌尿病理学会 GG 范围内准确检测出复发性 PCa 病变,从而支持其在广泛的复发性 PCa 患者中的临床应用。
{"title":"Impact of Clinical Factors on 18F-Flotufolastat Detection Rates in Men With Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of the Phase 3 SPOTLIGHT Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101532","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101532","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><sup>18</sup>F-Flotufolastat (<sup>18</sup>F-rhPSMA-7.3) is a newly approved prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting radiopharmaceutical for diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer (PCa). SPOTLIGHT (National Clinical Trials 04186845) evaluated <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat in men with suspected PCa recurrence. Here, we present results of predefined exploratory endpoints from SPOTLIGHT to evaluate the impact of clinical factors on <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat detection rates (DR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>The impact of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA doubling time (PSAdt), and International Society of Urologic Pathology Grade Group (GG) on <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat DR was evaluated among all SPOTLIGHT patients with an evaluable scan, with DR stratified according to the patients’ prior treatment (radical prostatectomy ± radiation therapy [RP] or radiation therapy only [RT]). The patients underwent positron emission tomography 50 to 70 minutes after receiving <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat (296 MBq IV), and scans were read by 3 blinded central readers, with the majority read representing agreement between ≥2 readers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 389 men (median PSA: 1.10 ng/mL) were evaluable. By majority read, <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat identified distant lesions in 39% and 43% of patients treated with prior RP or RT, respectively. The overall DR broadly increased with increasing PSA (&lt;0.2 ng/mL: 33%; ≥10 ng/mL: 100%). Among patients with PSA &lt;1 ng/mL, 68% had positive scans, and 27% had extrapelvic findings. PSAdt was available for 145/389 (37%) patients. PSAdt did not appear to influence <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat DR (77%-90% across all PSAdt categories). Among patients with prior RP, DR ranged from 70% to 83% across PSAdt categories, and 100% DR was reported for all post-RT patients. In total, 362/389 (93%) patients had baseline GG data. Overall DRs were uniformly high (75%‒95%) across all GG. When stratified by prior treatment, DRs across all GG were 69% to 89% in patients with prior RP and ≥96% in patients with prior RT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><sup>18</sup>F-Flotufolastat-positron emission tomography enabled the accurate detection of recurrent PCa lesions across a wide range of PSA, PSAdt, and International Society of Urologic Pathology GG, thus supporting its clinical utility for a broad range of patients with recurrent PCa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000952/pdfft?md5=52d6d6627ce3ef308d040e3c629b718c&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000952-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141029097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment Planning Methods for Dose Painting by Numbers Treatment in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery 伽玛刀放射外科手术中的数字剂量绘制治疗规划方法
IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101534

Purpose

Dose painting radiation therapy delivers a nonuniform dose to tumors to account for heterogeneous radiosensitivity. With recent and ongoing development of Gamma Knife machines making large-volume brain tumor treatments more practical, it is increasingly feasible to deliver dose painting treatments. The increased prescription complexity means automated treatment planning is greatly beneficial, and the impact of dose painting on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plan quality has not yet been studied. This research investigates the plan quality achievable for Gamma Knife SRS dose painting treatments when using optimization techniques and automated isocenter placement in treatment planning.

Methods and Materials

Dose painting prescription functions with varying parameters were applied to convert voxel image intensities to prescriptions for 10 sample cases. To study achievable plan quality and optimization, clinically placed isocenters were used with each dose painting prescription and optimized using a semi-infinite linear programming formulation. To study automated isocenter placement, a grassfire sphere-packing algorithm and a clinically available Leksell gamma plan isocenter fill algorithm were used. Plan quality for each optimized treatment plan was measured with dose painting SRS metrics.

Results

Optimization can be used to find high quality dose painting plans, and plan quality is affected by the dose painting prescription method. Polynomial function prescriptions show more achievable plan quality than sigmoid function prescriptions even with high mean dose boost. Automated isocenter placement is shown as a feasible method for dose painting SRS treatment, and increasing the number of isocenters improves plan quality. The computational solve time for optimization is within 5 minutes in most cases, which is suitable for clinical planning.

Conclusions

The impact of dose painting prescription method on achievable plan quality is quantified in this study. Optimization and automated isocenter placement are shown as possible treatment planning methods to obtain high quality plans.

目的剂量涂抹放射治疗可向肿瘤提供不均匀的剂量,以考虑不同的放射敏感性。随着最近伽玛刀设备的不断发展,大容量脑肿瘤治疗变得更加实用,进行剂量涂抹治疗也越来越可行。处方复杂性的增加意味着自动化治疗计划大有裨益,而剂量涂抹对立体定向放射手术(SRS)计划质量的影响尚未得到研究。本研究调查了在治疗计划中使用优化技术和自动等中心放置时伽马刀 SRS 剂量涂敷治疗可达到的计划质量。方法和材料应用不同参数的剂量涂敷处方函数,将 10 个样本病例的体素图像强度转换为处方。为了研究可实现的计划质量和优化,每个剂量绘制处方都使用了临床放置的等中心,并使用半无限线性编程公式进行优化。为了研究自动等中心放置,我们使用了草火球体填充算法和临床可用的雷克塞伽马计划等中心填充算法。结果优化可用于寻找高质量的剂量涂敷计划,计划质量受剂量涂敷处方方法的影响。即使平均剂量提升较高,多项式函数处方也比西格玛函数处方显示出更高的可实现计划质量。自动等中心放置被证明是剂量涂敷 SRS 治疗的可行方法,增加等中心数量可提高计划质量。在大多数情况下,优化的计算求解时间不超过 5 分钟,适合临床规划。优化和自动等中心放置是获得高质量计划的可行治疗计划方法。
{"title":"Treatment Planning Methods for Dose Painting by Numbers Treatment in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101534","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101534","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Dose painting radiation therapy delivers a nonuniform dose to tumors to account for heterogeneous radiosensitivity. With recent and ongoing development of Gamma Knife machines making large-volume brain tumor treatments more practical, it is increasingly feasible to deliver dose painting treatments. The increased prescription complexity means automated treatment planning is greatly beneficial, and the impact of dose painting on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plan quality has not yet been studied. This research investigates the plan quality achievable for Gamma Knife SRS dose painting treatments when using optimization techniques and automated isocenter placement in treatment planning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Dose painting prescription functions with varying parameters were applied to convert voxel image intensities to prescriptions for 10 sample cases. To study achievable plan quality and optimization, clinically placed isocenters were used with each dose painting prescription and optimized using a semi-infinite linear programming formulation. To study automated isocenter placement, a grassfire sphere-packing algorithm and a clinically available Leksell gamma plan isocenter fill algorithm were used. Plan quality for each optimized treatment plan was measured with dose painting SRS metrics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Optimization can be used to find high quality dose painting plans, and plan quality is affected by the dose painting prescription method. Polynomial function prescriptions show more achievable plan quality than sigmoid function prescriptions even with high mean dose boost. Automated isocenter placement is shown as a feasible method for dose painting SRS treatment, and increasing the number of isocenters improves plan quality. The computational solve time for optimization is within 5 minutes in most cases, which is suitable for clinical planning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The impact of dose painting prescription method on achievable plan quality is quantified in this study. Optimization and automated isocenter placement are shown as possible treatment planning methods to obtain high quality plans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000976/pdfft?md5=608466e3ee613eecd6026e214a108272&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000976-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141024365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Visualization and Radiation Treatment Plan Quality Scoring Method for Triage in a Population-Based Context 基于人群的可视化和放射治疗计划质量评分法进行分诊
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101533
Alexandra O. Leone MBS , Abdallah S.R. Mohamed MD, PhD , Clifton D. Fuller MD, PhD , Christine B. Peterson PhD , Adam S. Garden MD , Anna Lee MD, MPH , Lauren L. Mayo MD , Amy C. Moreno MD , Jay P. Reddy MD, PhD , Karen Hoffman MD , Joshua S. Niedzielski PhD , Laurence E. Court PhD , Thomas J. Whitaker PhD

Purpose

Our purpose was to develop a clinically intuitive and easily understandable scoring method using statistical metrics to visually determine the quality of a radiation treatment plan.

Methods and Materials

Data from 111 patients with head and neck cancer were used to establish a percentile-based scoring system for treatment plan quality evaluation on both a plan-by-plan and objective-by-objective basis. The percentile scores for each clinical objective and the overall treatment plan score were then visualized using a daisy plot. To validate our scoring method, 6 physicians were recruited to assess 60 plans, each using a scoring table consisting of a 5-point Likert scale (with scores ≥3 considered passing). Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to assess the association between increasing treatment plan percentile rank and physician rating, with Likert scores of 1 and 2 representing clinically unacceptable plans, scores of 3 and 4 representing plans needing minor edits, and a score of 5 representing clinically acceptable plans. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the scoring system's ability to quantify plan quality.

Results

Of the 60 plans scored by the physicians, 8 were deemed as clinically acceptable; these plans had an 89.0th ± 14.5 percentile value using our scoring system. The plans needing minor edits or deemed unacceptable had more variation, with scores falling in the 62.6nd ± 25.1 percentile and 35.6th ± 25.7 percentile, respectively. The estimated Spearman correlation coefficient between the physician score and treatment plan percentile was 0.53 (P < .001), indicating a moderate but statistically significant correlation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated discernment between acceptable and unacceptable plan quality, with an area under the curve of 0.76.

Conclusions

Our scoring system correlates with physician ratings while providing intuitive visual feedback for identifying good treatment plan quality, thereby indicating its utility in the quality assurance process.

我们的目的是利用统计指标开发一种临床直观、易于理解的评分方法,以直观的方式确定放射治疗计划的质量。方法和材料我们利用 111 名头颈部癌症患者的数据建立了基于百分位数的评分系统,用于逐个计划和逐个目标的治疗计划质量评估。然后使用菊花图将每个临床目标的百分位数得分和总体治疗方案得分可视化。为了验证我们的评分方法,我们招募了 6 名医生对 60 个计划进行评估,每个计划都使用了由 5 点李克特量表组成的评分表(得分≥3 分视为通过)。采用斯皮尔曼相关性分析评估治疗方案百分位数排名上升与医生评分之间的关系,其中 1 分和 2 分代表临床不可接受的方案,3 分和 4 分代表需要稍作修改的方案,5 分代表临床可接受的方案。结果 在医生评分的 60 个计划中,有 8 个计划被认为是临床可接受的;这些计划在我们的评分系统中的百分位值为 89.0 ± 14.5。需要进行小幅编辑或被认为不可接受的计划差异较大,得分分别为(62.6±25.1)百分位数和(35.6±25.7)百分位数。医生评分与治疗方案百分位数之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数估计值为 0.53(P <.001),表明两者之间存在中度但有统计学意义的相关性。结论我们的评分系统与医生评分相关,同时提供了直观的视觉反馈来识别良好的治疗方案质量,从而显示了其在质量保证过程中的实用性。
{"title":"A Visualization and Radiation Treatment Plan Quality Scoring Method for Triage in a Population-Based Context","authors":"Alexandra O. Leone MBS ,&nbsp;Abdallah S.R. Mohamed MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Clifton D. Fuller MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Christine B. Peterson PhD ,&nbsp;Adam S. Garden MD ,&nbsp;Anna Lee MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lauren L. Mayo MD ,&nbsp;Amy C. Moreno MD ,&nbsp;Jay P. Reddy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Karen Hoffman MD ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Niedzielski PhD ,&nbsp;Laurence E. Court PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Whitaker PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101533","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101533","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Our purpose was to develop a clinically intuitive and easily understandable scoring method using statistical metrics to visually determine the quality of a radiation treatment plan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Data from 111 patients with head and neck cancer were used to establish a percentile-based scoring system for treatment plan quality evaluation on both a plan-by-plan and objective-by-objective basis. The percentile scores for each clinical objective and the overall treatment plan score were then visualized using a daisy plot. To validate our scoring method, 6 physicians were recruited to assess 60 plans, each using a scoring table consisting of a 5-point Likert scale (with scores ≥3 considered passing). Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to assess the association between increasing treatment plan percentile rank and physician rating, with Likert scores of 1 and 2 representing clinically unacceptable plans, scores of 3 and 4 representing plans needing minor edits, and a score of 5 representing clinically acceptable plans. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the scoring system's ability to quantify plan quality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 60 plans scored by the physicians, 8 were deemed as clinically acceptable; these plans had an 89.0th ± 14.5 percentile value using our scoring system. The plans needing minor edits or deemed unacceptable had more variation, with scores falling in the 62.6nd ± 25.1 percentile and 35.6th ± 25.7 percentile, respectively. The estimated Spearman correlation coefficient between the physician score and treatment plan percentile was 0.53 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), indicating a moderate but statistically significant correlation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated discernment between acceptable and unacceptable plan quality, with an area under the curve of 0.76.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our scoring system correlates with physician ratings while providing intuitive visual feedback for identifying good treatment plan quality, thereby indicating its utility in the quality assurance process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000964/pdfft?md5=1ec273f3ec0b3ebf2b0a60ff2373317f&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000964-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141056759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optical Surface-guided Radiation Therapy for Upper and Lower Limb Sarcomas: An Analysis of Setup Errors and Clinical Target Volume-To-Planning Target Volume Margins 上下肢肉瘤的光学表面引导放射治疗:设置误差和临床靶体积与规划靶体积比值分析
IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101526
Yan-Xin Zhang MS , Fu-Kui Huan MB , Bao Wan MB, Zhao-Hui Li BS, Wei Li BS, Geng-Qiang Zhu BS, Zhi-Wei Wang BS, Huan Chen BS, Lu Hou MB, Hao Jing MD, Shu-Lian Wang MD, Ning-Ning Lu MD

Purpose

To assess the clinical benefits of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) in terms of setup error, positioning time, and clinical target volume-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods and Materials

Fifty consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy were selected retrospectively. Treatment setup was performed with either laser-based imaging only (control group), or with laser-based and daily optical surface-based imaging (SGRT group). Pretreatment cone beam computed tomography images were acquired daily for the first 3 to 5 fractions and weekly thereafter, with the frequency adjusted as necessary. Translational and rotational errors were collected. CTV-PTV margin was calculated using the formula, 2.5Σ + 0.7σ.

Results

Each group consisted of 10 and 15 upper and lower limb STSs, respectively. For patients with upper limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.64 ± 1.34 mm, 1.10 ± 1.50 mm, and 1.24 ± 1.45 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.48 ± 3.16 mm, 2.84 ± 2.85 mm, and 3.14 ± 3.29 mm in control group in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively. Correspondingly, for patients with lower limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.21 ± 1.65 mm, 1.39 ± 1.71 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.10 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.81 ± 2.60 mm, 2.93 ± 3.28 mm, and 3.53 ± 3.75 mm in control group, respectively. The calculated CTV-PTV margins of the SGRT group and control group were 5.0, 3.8, 4.1 versus 5.9, 9.1, 10.1 mm for upper limb sarcomas; and 4.2, 4.7, 5.2 mm versus 6.3, 9.6, and 11.4 mm for lower limb sarcomas in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusions

Daily optical surface guidance can effectively improve the setup accuracy of extremity STS patients, and safely reduce the required CTV-PTV margins.

目的 评估表面引导放射治疗(SGRT)在四肢软组织肉瘤(STS)的设置误差、定位时间和临床靶体积与规划靶体积(CTV-PTV)比值方面的临床优势。治疗设置为仅使用激光成像(对照组),或使用激光成像和日常光学表面成像(SGRT 组)。治疗前的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像在最初的 3 到 5 次分割中每天采集一次,之后每周采集一次,并根据需要调整频率。收集平移和旋转误差。结果每组分别有10名和15名上肢和下肢STS患者。对于上肢肉瘤患者,SGRT 组在左右方向、上内侧方向和前后侧方向的平移误差分别为 1.64 ± 1.34 毫米、1.10 ± 1.50 毫米和 1.24 ± 1.45 毫米;对照组在左右方向、上内侧方向和前后侧方向的平移误差分别为 1.48 ± 3.16 毫米、2.84 ± 2.85 毫米和 3.14 ± 3.29 毫米。相应地,对于下肢肉瘤患者,SGRT 组的平移误差分别为(1.21±1.65)毫米、(1.39±1.71)毫米和(1.48±2.10)毫米,对照组的平移误差分别为(1.81±2.60)毫米、(2.93±3.28)毫米和(3.53±3.75)毫米。SGRT组和对照组计算的CTV-PTV边缘分别为:上肢肉瘤5.0、3.8、4.1与5.9、9.1、10.1毫米;下肢肉瘤4.2、4.7、5.2毫米与6.3、9.6、11.结论日常光学表面引导可有效提高四肢 STS 患者的设置准确性,并安全地减少所需的 CTV-PTV 边界。
{"title":"Optical Surface-guided Radiation Therapy for Upper and Lower Limb Sarcomas: An Analysis of Setup Errors and Clinical Target Volume-To-Planning Target Volume Margins","authors":"Yan-Xin Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Fu-Kui Huan MB ,&nbsp;Bao Wan MB,&nbsp;Zhao-Hui Li BS,&nbsp;Wei Li BS,&nbsp;Geng-Qiang Zhu BS,&nbsp;Zhi-Wei Wang BS,&nbsp;Huan Chen BS,&nbsp;Lu Hou MB,&nbsp;Hao Jing MD,&nbsp;Shu-Lian Wang MD,&nbsp;Ning-Ning Lu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101526","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the clinical benefits of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) in terms of setup error, positioning time, and clinical target volume-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Fifty consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy were selected retrospectively. Treatment setup was performed with either laser-based imaging only (control group), or with laser-based and daily optical surface-based imaging (SGRT group). Pretreatment cone beam computed tomography images were acquired daily for the first 3 to 5 fractions and weekly thereafter, with the frequency adjusted as necessary. Translational and rotational errors were collected. CTV-PTV margin was calculated using the formula, 2.5Σ + 0.7σ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each group consisted of 10 and 15 upper and lower limb STSs, respectively. For patients with upper limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.64 ± 1.34 mm, 1.10 ± 1.50 mm, and 1.24 ± 1.45 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.48 ± 3.16 mm, 2.84 ± 2.85 mm, and 3.14 ± 3.29 mm in control group in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively. Correspondingly, for patients with lower limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.21 ± 1.65 mm, 1.39 ± 1.71 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.10 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.81 ± 2.60 mm, 2.93 ± 3.28 mm, and 3.53 ± 3.75 mm in control group, respectively. The calculated CTV-PTV margins of the SGRT group and control group were 5.0, 3.8, 4.1 versus 5.9, 9.1, 10.1 mm for upper limb sarcomas; and 4.2, 4.7, 5.2 mm versus 6.3, 9.6, and 11.4 mm for lower limb sarcomas in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Daily optical surface guidance can effectively improve the setup accuracy of extremity STS patients, and safely reduce the required CTV-PTV margins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000897/pdfft?md5=107e7ba8a24a5700b72242013256c9c7&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000897-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141484495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Including Seminal Vesicles in the Target Volume: A Treatment-planning Study Based on the HYPO-RT-PC Fractionation Schedule 前列腺癌的超高分次放射治疗(包括靶区中的精囊):基于 HYPO-RT-PC 分次计划的治疗规划研究
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101531
Elinore Wieslander PhD , Vilberg Jóhannesson PhD , Per Nilsson PhD , Elisabeth Kjellén MD, PhD , Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson MD, PhD

Purpose

Ultrahypofractionated (UHF) radiation therapy (RT) has become a treatment alternative for patients with localized prostate cancer. In more advanced cases, seminal vesicles (SVs) are routinely included in the target volume. The Scandinavian HYPO-RT-PC trial, which compared 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (fr) to conventional fractionation (CF), did not include SVs in the clinical target volume. The primary objective of the present work was to implement a ultrahypofractionated-simultaneous integrated boost (UHF-SIB) for prostate cancer RT, incorporating SVs into the target volume based on this fractionation schedule. A secondary objective was to analyze the unintentional dose coverage of SVs from state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments to the prostate gland only.

Methods and Materials

Two different equieffective UHF-SIB treatment schedules to SVs were derived based on the CF clinical schedule (50.0 Gy/25 fr to elective SVs and 70.0 Gy/35 fr to verified SV-invasion (SVI)) using the linear quadric model with α/β = 2 Gy and 3 Gy. The dose to the prostate was 42.7 Gy/7 fr in both schedules, with 31.2 Gy/37.8 Gy (α/β = 2 Gy) and 32.7 Gy/40.1 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy) to elective SV/verified SVI. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans to the proximal 10 mm and 20 mm were optimized, and dose-volume metrics for target volumes and organs at risk were evaluated.

Results

Dose metrics were overall lower for UHF-SIB compared with CF. QUANTEC-based volume criteria were 2% to 7% lower for the rectum and 2% to 4% lower for the bladder in the UHF-SIB. The D98% to elective SV was 7 to 12 Gy3 lower with UHF-SIB, and the corresponding data for verified SVI were approximately 2 to 3 Gy3. The SV(10 mm) V90%/(29.5 Gy) for prostate-only treatments (42.7 Gy) were as follows: median (IQR), 99% (87-100) and 78% (58-99) for the clinical target volume and planning target volume, respectively.

Conclusions

UHF RT based on the HYPO-RT-PC fractionation schedule, with a SIB technique, to the prostate and the base of the SV can be planned with lower doses (EQD2) to organs at risk, compared with CF. The unintentional dose to the proximal parts of SVs in prostate-only treatment can be substantial.

目的超高频(UHF)放射治疗(RT)已成为局部前列腺癌患者的一种治疗选择。在晚期病例中,精囊(SV)通常被纳入靶区。斯堪的纳维亚 HYPO-RT-PC 试验比较了 42.7 Gy 分 7 次治疗(fr)和常规分次治疗(CF),但临床靶区并不包括精囊。本研究的主要目的是在前列腺癌 RT 中实施超高分次同步综合增强(UHF-SIB),在此分次计划的基础上将 SV 纳入靶体积。方法和材料根据CF临床计划(50.0 Gy/25 fr用于选择性SV,70.0 Gy/35 fr用于验证性SV-浸润(SVI)),使用α/β = 2 Gy和3 Gy的线性四维模型,得出了两种不同的等效UHF-SIB治疗SV计划。两种方案的前列腺剂量均为42.7 Gy/7 fr,其中选择性SV/验证性SVI的剂量分别为31.2 Gy/37.8 Gy(α/β = 2 Gy)和32.7 Gy/40.1 Gy(α/β = 3 Gy)。对近端 10 毫米和 20 毫米的容积调控弧治疗计划进行了优化,并评估了目标容积和危险器官的剂量-容积指标。在 UHF-SIB 中,基于 QUANTEC 的体积标准对直肠降低了 2% 到 7%,对膀胱降低了 2% 到 4%。UHF-SIB 的 D98% 到选择性 SV 低 7 到 12 Gy3,而经过验证的 SVI 的相应数据约为 2 到 3 Gy3。纯前列腺治疗(42.7 Gy)的SV(10 mm)V90%/(29.5 Gy)如下:临床靶体积和计划靶体积的中位数(IQR)分别为99%(87-100)和78%(58-99)。在单纯前列腺治疗中,SV近端部位的无意剂量可能很大。
{"title":"Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Including Seminal Vesicles in the Target Volume: A Treatment-planning Study Based on the HYPO-RT-PC Fractionation Schedule","authors":"Elinore Wieslander PhD ,&nbsp;Vilberg Jóhannesson PhD ,&nbsp;Per Nilsson PhD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Kjellén MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101531","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Ultrahypofractionated (UHF) radiation therapy (RT) has become a treatment alternative for patients with localized prostate cancer. In more advanced cases, seminal vesicles (SVs) are routinely included in the target volume. The Scandinavian HYPO-RT-PC trial, which compared 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (fr) to conventional fractionation (CF), did not include SVs in the clinical target volume. The primary objective of the present work was to implement a ultrahypofractionated-simultaneous integrated boost (UHF-SIB) for prostate cancer RT, incorporating SVs into the target volume based on this fractionation schedule. A secondary objective was to analyze the unintentional dose coverage of SVs from state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments to the prostate gland only.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Two different equieffective UHF-SIB treatment schedules to SVs were derived based on the CF clinical schedule (50.0 Gy/25 fr to elective SVs and 70.0 Gy/35 fr to verified SV-invasion (SVI)) using the linear quadric model with α/β = 2 Gy and 3 Gy. The dose to the prostate was 42.7 Gy/7 fr in both schedules, with 31.2 Gy/37.8 Gy (α/β = 2 Gy) and 32.7 Gy/40.1 Gy (α/β = 3 Gy) to elective SV/verified SVI. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans to the proximal 10 mm and 20 mm were optimized, and dose-volume metrics for target volumes and organs at risk were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dose metrics were overall lower for UHF-SIB compared with CF. QUANTEC-based volume criteria were 2% to 7% lower for the rectum and 2% to 4% lower for the bladder in the UHF-SIB. The D<sub>98%</sub> to elective SV was 7 to 12 Gy<sub>3</sub> lower with UHF-SIB, and the corresponding data for verified SVI were approximately 2 to 3 Gy<sub>3</sub>. The SV(10 mm) V<sub>90%/(29.5 Gy)</sub> for prostate-only treatments (42.7 Gy) were as follows: median (IQR), 99% (87-100) and 78% (58-99) for the clinical target volume and planning target volume, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>UHF RT based on the HYPO-RT-PC fractionation schedule, with a SIB technique, to the prostate and the base of the SV can be planned with lower doses (EQD2) to organs at risk, compared with CF. The unintentional dose to the proximal parts of SVs in prostate-only treatment can be substantial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 7","pages":"Article 101531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000940/pdfft?md5=9a1c0706c9ed6d6e8792a782f49ca6b0&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000940-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141241390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exacerbated Inflammatory Gene Expression After Impaired G2/M-Checkpoint Arrest in Fibroblasts Derived From a Patient Exhibiting Severe Adverse Effects 严重不良反应患者成纤维细胞的 G2/M 检查点停滞受损后炎症基因表达加剧
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101530
Takahiro Oike , Ken Okuda , Shunji Haruna , Akiko Shibata , Ryota Hayashi , Mayu Isono , Kohei Tateno , Nobuteru Kubo , Akihiko Uchiyama , Sei-Ichiro Motegi , Tatsuya Ohno , Yuki Uchihara , Yu Kato , Atsushi Shibata

Purpose

Recent radiation therapy (RT), such as intensity modulated radiation therapy and particle RT, has improved the concentration of the radiation field targeting tumors. However, severe adverse effects still occur, possibly due to genetic factors in patients. We aimed to investigate the mechanism of exacerbated inflammation during RT.

Methods and Materials

Dermal fibroblasts derived from a patient with severe inflammatory adverse effects during RT were compared with 2 normal human dermal fibroblasts. Micronuclei formation, G2/M-checkpoint arrest, DNA damage signaling and repair, and inflammatory gene expression were comprehensively examined.

Results

We found greater micronuclei formation in radiation-sensitive fibroblasts (RS-Fs) after ionizing radiation (IR). RS-Fs exhibited premature G2/M-checkpoint release after IR, which triggers micronuclei formation because RS-Fs undergo mitosis with unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Additionally, we found that DSB end-resection and activation of the ATR-Chk1 pathway were impaired in RS-Fs after IR. Consistent with the increase in the formation of micronuclei, which can deliver cytosolic nucleic acids resulting in an innate immune response, the expression of genes associated with inflammatory responses was highly upregulated in RS-Fs after IR.

Conclusions

Although this is a single case of RT-dependent adverse effect, our findings suggest that impaired G2/M-checkpoint arrest due to the lack of DSB end-resection and activation of the ATR-Chk1 pathway causes exacerbated inflammation during RT; therefore, genes involved in G2/M-checkpoint arrest may be a predictive marker for unexpected inflammatory responses in RT.

目的近期的放射治疗(RT),如调强放射治疗和粒子放射治疗,提高了靶向肿瘤的放射野浓度。然而,可能由于患者的遗传因素,严重的不良反应仍时有发生。我们的目的是研究 RT 期间炎症加剧的机制。方法和材料将一名在 RT 期间出现严重炎症不良反应的患者的真皮成纤维细胞与 2 名正常人的真皮成纤维细胞进行比较。结果我们发现电离辐射(IR)后辐射敏感成纤维细胞(RS-Fs)的微核形成更多。RS-Fs在电离辐射后表现出过早的G2/M检查点释放,这引发了微核的形成,因为RS-Fs在有丝分裂过程中会出现未修复的DNA双链断裂(DSB)。此外,我们还发现,IR 后,RS-Fs 中的 DSB 末端切除和 ATR-Chk1 通路的激活受到了损害。微核可传递细胞核酸,导致先天性免疫反应,与此相一致的是,IR 后 RS-Fs 中与炎症反应相关的基因表达高度上调。结论虽然这是单例RT依赖性不良反应,但我们的研究结果表明,由于缺乏DSB末端切除和ATR-Chk1通路的激活,G2/M检查点停滞功能受损,导致RT过程中炎症加剧;因此,参与G2/M检查点停滞的基因可能是RT过程中意外炎症反应的预测标记。
{"title":"Exacerbated Inflammatory Gene Expression After Impaired G2/M-Checkpoint Arrest in Fibroblasts Derived From a Patient Exhibiting Severe Adverse Effects","authors":"Takahiro Oike ,&nbsp;Ken Okuda ,&nbsp;Shunji Haruna ,&nbsp;Akiko Shibata ,&nbsp;Ryota Hayashi ,&nbsp;Mayu Isono ,&nbsp;Kohei Tateno ,&nbsp;Nobuteru Kubo ,&nbsp;Akihiko Uchiyama ,&nbsp;Sei-Ichiro Motegi ,&nbsp;Tatsuya Ohno ,&nbsp;Yuki Uchihara ,&nbsp;Yu Kato ,&nbsp;Atsushi Shibata","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101530","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Recent radiation therapy (RT), such as intensity modulated radiation therapy and particle RT, has improved the concentration of the radiation field targeting tumors. However, severe adverse effects still occur, possibly due to genetic factors in patients. We aimed to investigate the mechanism of exacerbated inflammation during RT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Dermal fibroblasts derived from a patient with severe inflammatory adverse effects during RT were compared with 2 normal human dermal fibroblasts. Micronuclei formation, G2/M-checkpoint arrest, DNA damage signaling and repair, and inflammatory gene expression were comprehensively examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found greater micronuclei formation in radiation-sensitive fibroblasts (RS-Fs) after ionizing radiation (IR). RS-Fs exhibited premature G2/M-checkpoint release after IR, which triggers micronuclei formation because RS-Fs undergo mitosis with unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Additionally, we found that DSB end-resection and activation of the ATR-Chk1 pathway were impaired in RS-Fs after IR. Consistent with the increase in the formation of micronuclei, which can deliver cytosolic nucleic acids resulting in an innate immune response, the expression of genes associated with inflammatory responses was highly upregulated in RS-Fs after IR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although this is a single case of RT-dependent adverse effect, our findings suggest that impaired G2/M-checkpoint arrest due to the lack of DSB end-resection and activation of the ATR-Chk1 pathway causes exacerbated inflammation during RT; therefore, genes involved in G2/M-checkpoint arrest may be a predictive marker for unexpected inflammatory responses in RT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000939/pdfft?md5=81ab3126a13885d4171e487f32898eaa&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000939-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141423925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concurrent Olaparib and Radiation Therapy for BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer 奥拉帕利和放疗同时治疗 BRCA2 突变乳腺癌
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101528
Danny Lavigne MD , Lucas Sideris MD , Lara de Guerke MD , Eve-Lyne Marchand MD , Suzanne Fortin MD , Pierre Dubé MD , Peter Vavassis MD , Marie-Hélène Auclair MD , Michael Yassa MD
{"title":"Concurrent Olaparib and Radiation Therapy for BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer","authors":"Danny Lavigne MD ,&nbsp;Lucas Sideris MD ,&nbsp;Lara de Guerke MD ,&nbsp;Eve-Lyne Marchand MD ,&nbsp;Suzanne Fortin MD ,&nbsp;Pierre Dubé MD ,&nbsp;Peter Vavassis MD ,&nbsp;Marie-Hélène Auclair MD ,&nbsp;Michael Yassa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101528","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 7","pages":"Article 101528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000915/pdfft?md5=7b6f57227eb9cc7b18148a12a923b56d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000915-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141066800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combining Obinutuzumab With Radiation for Refractory DLBCL: Retrospective Safety and Efficacy Analysis 奥比妥珠单抗与放疗联合治疗难治性DLBCL:安全性和疗效回顾性分析
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101524
Brett A. Morris MD, PhD , Emily C. Merfeld MD , Adam R. Burr MD, PhD , Kristin A. Bradley MD , Christopher D. Fletcher MD

Purpose

Approximately 30% of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will develop relapsed or treatment-refractory disease after primary chemotherapy. Patients unable to undergo aggressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy have limited treatment options. Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of combining obinutuzumab with cytoreductive radiation to all areas of disease in patients with relapsed DLBCL.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective review of patients with treatment refractory DLBCL was performed. All patients were treated with external beam radiation to all sites of refractory disease with concurrent and adjuvant obinutuzumab. Toxicities were evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression-free survival and overall survival.

Results

Between 2016 and 2022, 7 patients with refractory DLBCL were treated with concurrent radiation and obinutuzumab. No grade 3 or greater treatment-related toxicity was observed. Four of the 7 patients had a complete response at the radiated site on first postradiation imaging. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 30 months.

Conclusions

In this small cohort of treatment-refractory patients with DLBCL, the combination of radiation and obinutuzumab was well tolerated without excessive treatment-related toxicity. The combination resulted in durable disease control with a prolonged overall survival without additional treatment in a subset of patients.

目的约有30%的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者在初治化疗后会出现复发或难治性疾病。无法接受积极化疗和干细胞移植或嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR T细胞)疗法的患者,其治疗选择非常有限。在此,我们研究了复发DLBCL患者将奥比妥珠单抗与对所有病变区域进行细胞修复性放射治疗相结合的安全性和有效性。所有患者均接受了所有难治性疾病部位的体外放射治疗,并同时接受了奥比妥珠单抗的辅助治疗。毒性根据《不良事件通用术语标准》v5.0标准进行评估。结果2016年至2022年间,7名难治性DLBCL患者接受了同期放疗和奥比妥珠单抗治疗。未观察到3级或更严重的治疗相关毒性。7名患者中有4人在放疗后首次成像时,放疗部位出现完全反应。中位无进展生存期和总生存期均为30个月。结论在这一小批治疗难治的DLBCL患者中,放疗与奥比妥珠单抗的联合治疗耐受性良好,没有出现过多的治疗相关毒性。联合用药后,部分患者的疾病得到了持久控制,总生存期延长,无需额外治疗。
{"title":"Combining Obinutuzumab With Radiation for Refractory DLBCL: Retrospective Safety and Efficacy Analysis","authors":"Brett A. Morris MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emily C. Merfeld MD ,&nbsp;Adam R. Burr MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kristin A. Bradley MD ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Fletcher MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101524","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Approximately 30% of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will develop relapsed or treatment-refractory disease after primary chemotherapy. Patients unable to undergo aggressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy have limited treatment options. Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of combining obinutuzumab with cytoreductive radiation to all areas of disease in patients with relapsed DLBCL.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>A retrospective review of patients with treatment refractory DLBCL was performed. All patients were treated with external beam radiation to all sites of refractory disease with concurrent and adjuvant obinutuzumab. Toxicities were evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression-free survival and overall survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2016 and 2022, 7 patients with refractory DLBCL were treated with concurrent radiation and obinutuzumab. No grade 3 or greater treatment-related toxicity was observed. Four of the 7 patients had a complete response at the radiated site on first postradiation imaging. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 30 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this small cohort of treatment-refractory patients with DLBCL, the combination of radiation and obinutuzumab was well tolerated without excessive treatment-related toxicity. The combination resulted in durable disease control with a prolonged overall survival without additional treatment in a subset of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 7","pages":"Article 101524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000873/pdfft?md5=20cda2a4f3814dcc6d7394bf3875bef4&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000873-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141067655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motion-Inclusive Treatment Planning to Assess Normal Tissue Dose for Central Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy 利用运动包容性治疗计划评估中央肺立体定向体放射治疗的正常组织剂量
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101525
David Cooper MD , Laura Padilla PhD , Amy Watson CMD , Keith Neiderer CMD , Benjamin Smith CMD , Elisabeth Weiss MD

Purpose

For lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, 4-dimensional computed tomography is often used to delineate target volumes, whereas organs at risk (OARs) are typically outlined on either average intensity projection (AIP) or midventilation (MidV = 30% phase) images. AIP has been widely adopted as it represents a true average, but image blurring often precludes accurate contouring of critical structures such as central airways. Here, we compare AIP versus MidV planning for centrally located tumors via respiratory motion-inclusive (RMI) plans to better evaluate dose delivered throughout the breathing cycle.

Methods and Materials

Independently contoured and optimized AIP and MidV plans were created for 16 treatments and rigidly copied to each of the 10 breathing phase-specific computed tomography image sets. Resulting dose distributions were deformably registered back to the MidV image set (used as reference because of clearer depiction of anatomy compared with motion-blurred AIP) and averaged to create RMI plans. Doses to central OARs were compared between plans.

Results

Mean absolute dose differences were low for all comparisons (range, 0.01-2.87 Gy); however, individual plans exhibited differences >20 Gy. Dose differences >5 Gy were observed most often for plan comparisons involving AIP-based plans (MidV vs AIP 23, AIP RMI vs AIP 12, MidV RMI vs AIP RMI 7, and MidV RMI vs MidV 8 times). Inclusion of respiratory motion reduced large dose differences. Standard OAR thresholds were exceeded up to 5 times for each plan comparison scenario and always involved proximal bronchial tree D4 cc tolerance dose. AIP-based contours were larger by, on average, 3% to 15%.

Conclusions

Large dose differences were observed when plans with AIP-based contours were compared with MidV-based contours, indicating that observed dose differences were likely due to contoured volume differences rather than the effect of motion. Because of blurring with AIP images, MidV RMI-based planning may offer a more accurate method to determine dose to critical OARs in the presence of respiratory motion.

目的在肺部立体定向体部放射治疗中,通常使用四维计算机断层扫描来划定靶体积,而危险器官(OAR)通常是在平均强度投影(AIP)或中间通气(MidV = 30% 相位)图像上勾勒出来的。AIP 代表真正的平均值,因此已被广泛采用,但图像模糊往往导致无法准确勾勒出中央气道等关键结构的轮廓。在此,我们通过呼吸运动全包(RMI)计划对中心位置肿瘤的 AIP 与 MidV 计划进行了比较,以更好地评估整个呼吸周期的剂量。方法与材料为 16 次治疗创建了独立轮廓和优化的 AIP 和 MidV 计划,并严格复制到 10 个呼吸相位特定的计算机断层扫描图像集中的每一个。将结果剂量分布变形注册回 MidV 图像集(用作参考,因为与运动模糊的 AIP 相比,MidV 图像集能更清晰地描绘解剖结构),然后取平均值创建 RMI 计划。结果所有比较的平均绝对剂量差异都很低(范围为 0.01-2.87 Gy);但是,单个计划的差异达 20 Gy。在基于 AIP 的计划比较中,最常观察到 5 Gy 的剂量差异(MidV vs AIP 23 次,AIP RMI vs AIP 12 次,MidV RMI vs AIP RMI 7 次,MidV RMI vs MidV 8 次)。呼吸运动的加入减少了巨大的剂量差异。在每个计划比较方案中,最多有 5 次超过标准 OAR 临界值,并且总是涉及近端支气管树 D4 cc 容限剂量。结论将基于 AIP 轮廓的计划与基于 MidV 轮廓的计划进行比较时,观察到巨大的剂量差异,这表明观察到的剂量差异很可能是由于轮廓体积的差异而不是运动的影响。由于 AIP 图像的模糊性,基于 MidV RMI 的计划可能提供了一种更准确的方法,在存在呼吸运动的情况下确定关键 OAR 的剂量。
{"title":"Motion-Inclusive Treatment Planning to Assess Normal Tissue Dose for Central Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy","authors":"David Cooper MD ,&nbsp;Laura Padilla PhD ,&nbsp;Amy Watson CMD ,&nbsp;Keith Neiderer CMD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Smith CMD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Weiss MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101525","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>For lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, 4-dimensional computed tomography is often used to delineate target volumes, whereas organs at risk (OARs) are typically outlined on either average intensity projection (AIP) or midventilation (MidV = 30% phase) images. AIP has been widely adopted as it represents a true average, but image blurring often precludes accurate contouring of critical structures such as central airways. Here, we compare AIP versus MidV planning for centrally located tumors via respiratory motion-inclusive (RMI) plans to better evaluate dose delivered throughout the breathing cycle.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Independently contoured and optimized AIP and MidV plans were created for 16 treatments and rigidly copied to each of the 10 breathing phase-specific computed tomography image sets. Resulting dose distributions were deformably registered back to the MidV image set (used as reference because of clearer depiction of anatomy compared with motion-blurred AIP) and averaged to create RMI plans. Doses to central OARs were compared between plans.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean absolute dose differences were low for all comparisons (range, 0.01-2.87 Gy); however, individual plans exhibited differences &gt;20 Gy. Dose differences &gt;5 Gy were observed most often for plan comparisons involving AIP-based plans (MidV vs AIP 23, AIP RMI vs AIP 12, MidV RMI vs AIP RMI 7, and MidV RMI vs MidV 8 times). Inclusion of respiratory motion reduced large dose differences. Standard OAR thresholds were exceeded up to 5 times for each plan comparison scenario and always involved proximal bronchial tree D4 cc tolerance dose. AIP-based contours were larger by, on average, 3% to 15%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Large dose differences were observed when plans with AIP-based contours were compared with MidV-based contours, indicating that observed dose differences were likely due to contoured volume differences rather than the effect of motion. Because of blurring with AIP images, MidV RMI-based planning may offer a more accurate method to determine dose to critical OARs in the presence of respiratory motion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 7","pages":"Article 101525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000885/pdfft?md5=2eba7bed77a69f4551986c6e697a0c3d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000885-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141249984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dosimetric Advantage of Combined IMRT for Whole Lung and Abdomen Irradiation for Wilms Tumor 对 Wilms 肿瘤进行全肺和腹部联合 IMRT 放射治疗的剂量学优势
IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101527
Basil H. Chaballout BA , Kyra N. McComas MD , Mohamed Khattab MD , Gabrielle P. Seymore MS, DABR , Stephen K. Martinez PhD , Guozhen Luo MS , Austin Kirschner MD, PhD , Leo Y. Luo MD

Purpose

In patients with Wilms tumor with lung metastases, a cardiac-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (CS-IMRT) technique is increasingly being adopted for whole lung irradiation. However, the standard technique for flank and whole abdomen radiation remains 2-dimensional anterioposterior (AP), and overlap at the junction between the whole lung CS-IMRT and abdominal AP fields can result in overdose to normal organs. Here, we compared the dosimetry of patients who received whole lung irradiation and flank or abdominal radiation therapy with CS-IMRT with AP abdominal field (IMRT-AP) versus CS-IMRT with IMRT abdominal field (combined IMRT).

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed the radiation plans of 2 patients with Wilms tumor who received CS-IMRT and flank or whole abdomen irradiation with a combined IMRT approach. Comparison IMRT-AP plans were generated with equivalent target coverage of 95% receiving the prescribed dose. Maximum doses to normal organs were compared at the junctional overlap.

Results

Overlap at the junction between CS-IMRT and abdominal fields resulted in a significantly lower dose with combined IMRT plans compared with IMRT-AP plan. Differences in maximum doses (in cGy) to normal organs between combined IMRT versus IMRT-AP plans were most significant in the vertebral body (patient 1 = 1277 vs 2065; patient 2 = 1334 vs 2287), lungs (patient 1 = 1298 vs 2081; patient 2 = 1234 vs 1820), spinal cord (patient 1 = 1235 vs 1975; patient 2 = 1345 vs 2253), stomach (patient 1 = 1264 vs 1977; patient 2 = 1118 vs 2062), and liver (patient 1 = 1297 vs 1889; patient 2 = 1334 vs 2237).

Conclusions

The combined IMRT approach for Wilms patients who require whole lung and abdomen irradiation can provide more uniform dose distribution in the junction area and significantly lower doses to normal organs at the junctional overlap.

目的 在有肺转移的 Wilms 肿瘤患者中,越来越多的人采用保心调强放射治疗(CS-IMRT)技术进行全肺照射。然而,侧腹和全腹放射的标准技术仍然是二维前后野(AP),全肺 CS-IMRT 和腹部 AP 野交界处的重叠可能导致正常器官剂量过大。在此,我们比较了采用腹部 AP 场 CS-IMRT(IMRT-AP)和腹部 IMRT 场 CS-IMRT(联合 IMRT)进行全肺照射和侧腹或腹部放疗的患者的剂量学。方法和材料我们回顾性地审查了 2 名 Wilms 肿瘤患者的放疗计划,他们采用联合 IMRT 方法接受了 CS-IMRT 和侧腹或全腹照射。对比IMRT-AP计划的目标覆盖率为95%,接受规定剂量。结果与 IMRT-AP 计划相比,CS-IMRT 和腹部野交界处的重叠导致联合 IMRT 计划的剂量显著降低。患者 2 = 1234 vs 1820)、脊髓(患者 1 = 1235 vs 1975;患者 2 = 1345 vs 2253)、胃(患者 1 = 1264 vs 1977;患者 2 = 1118 vs 2062)和肝脏(患者 1 = 1297 vs 1889;患者 2 = 1334 vs 2237)。结论对于需要进行全肺和腹部照射的威尔姆斯病患者,联合 IMRT 方法可以在交界区域提供更均匀的剂量分布,并显著降低交界重叠处正常器官的剂量。
{"title":"Dosimetric Advantage of Combined IMRT for Whole Lung and Abdomen Irradiation for Wilms Tumor","authors":"Basil H. Chaballout BA ,&nbsp;Kyra N. McComas MD ,&nbsp;Mohamed Khattab MD ,&nbsp;Gabrielle P. Seymore MS, DABR ,&nbsp;Stephen K. Martinez PhD ,&nbsp;Guozhen Luo MS ,&nbsp;Austin Kirschner MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Leo Y. Luo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101527","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In patients with Wilms tumor with lung metastases, a cardiac-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (CS-IMRT) technique is increasingly being adopted for whole lung irradiation. However, the standard technique for flank and whole abdomen radiation remains 2-dimensional anterioposterior (AP), and overlap at the junction between the whole lung CS-IMRT and abdominal AP fields can result in overdose to normal organs. Here, we compared the dosimetry of patients who received whole lung irradiation and flank or abdominal radiation therapy with CS-IMRT with AP abdominal field (IMRT-AP) versus CS-IMRT with IMRT abdominal field (combined IMRT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed the radiation plans of 2 patients with Wilms tumor who received CS-IMRT and flank or whole abdomen irradiation with a combined IMRT approach. Comparison IMRT-AP plans were generated with equivalent target coverage of 95% receiving the prescribed dose. Maximum doses to normal organs were compared at the junctional overlap.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overlap at the junction between CS-IMRT and abdominal fields resulted in a significantly lower dose with combined IMRT plans compared with IMRT-AP plan. Differences in maximum doses (in cGy) to normal organs between combined IMRT versus IMRT-AP plans were most significant in the vertebral body (patient 1 = 1277 vs 2065; patient 2 = 1334 vs 2287), lungs (patient 1 = 1298 vs 2081; patient 2 = 1234 vs 1820), spinal cord (patient 1 = 1235 vs 1975; patient 2 = 1345 vs 2253), stomach (patient 1 = 1264 vs 1977; patient 2 = 1118 vs 2062), and liver (patient 1 = 1297 vs 1889; patient 2 = 1334 vs 2237).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combined IMRT approach for Wilms patients who require whole lung and abdomen irradiation can provide more uniform dose distribution in the junction area and significantly lower doses to normal organs at the junctional overlap.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424000903/pdfft?md5=573984a7ab83d6b2b2cf567c336fd4b0&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424000903-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141324941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1