首页 > 最新文献

Advances in Radiation Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Functional Dose-Volume Analysis Based on a Novel Image Biomarker Derived From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Poststereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Liver Function Preservation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma 基于动态增强磁共振成像的新型图像生物标志物的功能剂量-体积分析预测肝癌患者立体定向放射治疗后肝功能保存
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101883
Yimin Ni MSc , Ho-Fun Victor Lee MD , Chi-leung Chiang MD , Lai-Yin Andy Cheung PhD , Zhengxing Huang PhD , Xinzhi Teng PhD , Jiang Zhang PhD , Ge Ren PhD , Jing Cai PhD , Tian Li PhD

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify functional dose-volume parameters based on image biomarker derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting poststereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) liver function deterioration (LFD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods and Materials

Forty-eight patients treated with SBRT were retrospectively included. All patients underwent gadoxetate-enhanced DCE-MRI before treatment. Equivalent uniform dose, absolute dose-volume parameters including Dxcc and VxGy(cc) were calculated in 3 liver volumes: the anatomic volume (AV), the high-functional volumes (HFV) defined based on DCE-MRI derived function map, and the low-functional volume (LFV = AV – HFV). The primary endpoint of this study was the LFD as indicated by ∆albumin-bilirubin ≥ 0.5 at 1-month post-SBRT. Dose-volume parameters in patients with and without LFD were compared. Univariate logistic regression models were built to assess the ability of dose-volume parameters to distinguish between LFD and non-LFD cases.

Results

Of the 48 patients, 12 (25%) had LFD (∆albumin-bilirubin ≥ 0.5). The dose-volume parameters in the AV and LFV were not statistically different in patients with and without LFD (P > .005), while D300cc, D400cc, and V10Gy(cc) of the HFV were significantly higher in patients with LFD than in the non-LFD group (P < .005). For distinguishing LFD and non-LFD cases, the mean area under curves (AUCs) for D300cc of AV, LFV, and HFV are 0.60, 0.50, and 0.78, respectively. The mean AUCs for D400cc of AV, LFV, and HFV are 0.62, 0.50, and 0.78, respectively. The mean AUCs for V10Gy of AV, LFV, and HFV are 0.63, 0.48, and 0.77, respectively.

Conclusions

The dose-volume parameters derived from HFV were linked to the risk of post-SBRT LFD. These functional parameters derived based on DCE-MRI could be useful to guide more personalized SBRT planning to protect liver function.
目的本研究的目的是确定基于动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)获得的图像生物标志物的功能剂量-体积参数,用于预测肝细胞癌患者立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)后肝功能恶化(LFD)。方法与材料回顾性分析48例接受SBRT治疗的患者。所有患者治疗前均行加多赛特增强DCE-MRI检查。计算等效均匀剂量、绝对剂量-体积参数Dxcc、VxGy(cc) 3个肝体积:解剖体积(AV)、基于DCE-MRI衍生功能图定义的高功能体积(HFV)、低功能体积(LFV = AV - HFV)。本研究的主要终点是sbrt后1个月时,以∆白蛋白-胆红素≥0.5表示的LFD。比较LFD患者和非LFD患者的剂量-体积参数。建立单变量逻辑回归模型来评估剂量-体积参数区分LFD和非LFD病例的能力。结果48例患者中,12例(25%)发生LFD(∆白蛋白-胆红素≥0.5)。肝功能不全组与无肝功能不全组间房颤、低房颤的剂量-体积参数差异无统计学意义(P < 0.005),肝功能不全组间房颤D300cc、D400cc、V10Gy(cc)显著高于无肝功能不全组(P < 0.005)。为了区分LFD和非LFD病例,AV、LFV和HFV的D300cc的平均曲线下面积(aus)分别为0.60、0.50和0.78。AV、LFV和HFV D400cc的平均auc分别为0.62、0.50和0.78。AV、LFV和HFV V10Gy的平均auc分别为0.63、0.48和0.77。结论HFV衍生的剂量-体积参数与sbrt后LFD的风险相关。这些基于DCE-MRI的功能参数可用于指导更个性化的SBRT计划以保护肝功能。
{"title":"Functional Dose-Volume Analysis Based on a Novel Image Biomarker Derived From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Poststereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Liver Function Preservation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma","authors":"Yimin Ni MSc ,&nbsp;Ho-Fun Victor Lee MD ,&nbsp;Chi-leung Chiang MD ,&nbsp;Lai-Yin Andy Cheung PhD ,&nbsp;Zhengxing Huang PhD ,&nbsp;Xinzhi Teng PhD ,&nbsp;Jiang Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Ge Ren PhD ,&nbsp;Jing Cai PhD ,&nbsp;Tian Li PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101883","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101883","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to identify functional dose-volume parameters based on image biomarker derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting poststereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) liver function deterioration (LFD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Forty-eight patients treated with SBRT were retrospectively included. All patients underwent gadoxetate-enhanced DCE-MRI before treatment. Equivalent uniform dose, absolute dose-volume parameters including Dxcc and VxGy(cc) were calculated in 3 liver volumes: the anatomic volume (AV), the high-functional volumes (HFV) defined based on DCE-MRI derived function map, and the low-functional volume (LFV = AV – HFV). The primary endpoint of this study was the LFD as indicated by ∆albumin-bilirubin ≥ 0.5 at 1-month post-SBRT. Dose-volume parameters in patients with and without LFD were compared. Univariate logistic regression models were built to assess the ability of dose-volume parameters to distinguish between LFD and non-LFD cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 48 patients, 12 (25%) had LFD (∆albumin-bilirubin ≥ 0.5). The dose-volume parameters in the AV and LFV were not statistically different in patients with and without LFD (<em>P</em> &gt; .005), while D300cc, D400cc, and V10Gy(cc) of the HFV were significantly higher in patients with LFD than in the non-LFD group (<em>P</em> &lt; .005). For distinguishing LFD and non-LFD cases, the mean area under curves (AUCs) for D300cc of AV, LFV, and HFV are 0.60, 0.50, and 0.78, respectively. The mean AUCs for D400cc of AV, LFV, and HFV are 0.62, 0.50, and 0.78, respectively. The mean AUCs for V10Gy of AV, LFV, and HFV are 0.63, 0.48, and 0.77, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The dose-volume parameters derived from HFV were linked to the risk of post-SBRT LFD. These functional parameters derived based on DCE-MRI could be useful to guide more personalized SBRT planning to protect liver function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 11","pages":"Article 101883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145324503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Efficacy of Hydrogen Therapy on Acute Radiation Enteritis and Inflammatory Response in Patients with Cervical Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy 氢疗法治疗宫颈癌同步放化疗急性放射性肠炎的临床疗效及炎症反应
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101879
Bo Liu PhD , Yao Bao MD , Jinan Ma PhD , Xiaodong Wang PhD , Yeqian Feng PhD

Purpose

Acute radiation enteritis (ARE) is a common toxic inflammatory reaction in patients with cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). Molecular hydrogen, as a novel antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, may alleviate treatment-related toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled hydrogen in preventing ARE and modulating systemic inflammation.

Methods

Eligible patients with cervical cancer undergoing CCRT were prospectively enrolled and randomized into an experimental group (n = 28) or a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received inhalation therapy with a hydrogen-oxygen gas mixture (66.6% hydrogen, 33.3% oxygen; 3 L/min, 2 h/d) on each radiation therapy day. Inflammatory biomarkers—including C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and interleukin 6—as well as hemogram parameters, fecal occult blood, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force—Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic scores; Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment scores; and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group enteritis grades were monitored during treatment and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors scores.

Results

Baseline characteristics (age, tumor stage, pathology, and surgical history) were balanced between groups (P > .05). Compared with the control group, the experimental group showed significantly lower levels of C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, interleukin 6, and fecal occult blood positivity rates (P < .05). Clinical assessments also indicated lower Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force–Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment scores and milder Radiation Therapy Oncology Group enteritis grading in the hydrogen group (P < .05). Importantly, no significant difference in tumor response was observed between groups based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, suggesting that hydrogen therapy did not interfere with the antitumor efficacy of CCRT. No adverse events related to hydrogen inhalation were reported.

Conclusion

Hydrogen inhalation is a safe and effective adjunctive therapy that significantly alleviates inflammation and mitigates clinical symptoms of ARE in patients with cervical cancer who are undergoing CCRT, without compromising antitumor treatment outcomes.
目的急性放射性肠炎(acute radiation enteritis, ARE)是宫颈癌同步放化疗(CCRT)患者常见的中毒性炎症反应。氢分子作为一种新型抗氧化剂和抗炎剂,可能减轻治疗相关的毒性。本研究旨在评估吸入氢在预防ARE和调节全身炎症中的作用。方法前瞻性选择符合条件的宫颈癌行CCRT患者,随机分为实验组(n = 28)和对照组(n = 30)。实验组患者在每个放疗日采用氢氧混合气体(氢66.6%,氧33.3%,3 L/min, 2 h/d)吸入治疗。炎症生物标志物——包括c反应蛋白、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值和白细胞介素6——以及血象参数、粪便隐血、后期效应正常组织任务组——主观、客观、管理和分析评分;患者主观整体评估评分;在治疗期间监测肠炎等级和实体瘤反应评价标准评分。结果两组患者的基线特征(年龄、肿瘤分期、病理、手术史)比较平衡(P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,实验组c反应蛋白水平、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、白细胞介素6水平和粪便隐血阳性率均显著降低(P < 0.05)。临床评估还显示,氢组的后期效应正常组织任务组主观、客观、管理、分析和患者主观整体评估评分较低,放射治疗肿瘤组肠炎评分较轻(P < 0.05)。重要的是,根据实体瘤反应评价标准,两组间肿瘤反应无显著差异,提示氢疗法不干扰CCRT的抗肿瘤疗效。没有与氢气吸入相关的不良事件报告。结论氢吸入是一种安全有效的辅助治疗方法,可显著减轻宫颈癌行CCRT患者急性急性呼吸道感染的炎症和临床症状,且不影响抗肿瘤治疗效果。
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Hydrogen Therapy on Acute Radiation Enteritis and Inflammatory Response in Patients with Cervical Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy","authors":"Bo Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Yao Bao MD ,&nbsp;Jinan Ma PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Yeqian Feng PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101879","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101879","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Acute radiation enteritis (ARE) is a common toxic inflammatory reaction in patients with cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). Molecular hydrogen, as a novel antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, may alleviate treatment-related toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled hydrogen in preventing ARE and modulating systemic inflammation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eligible patients with cervical cancer undergoing CCRT were prospectively enrolled and randomized into an experimental group (n = 28) or a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received inhalation therapy with a hydrogen-oxygen gas mixture (66.6% hydrogen, 33.3% oxygen; 3 L/min, 2 h/d) on each radiation therapy day. Inflammatory biomarkers—including C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and interleukin 6—as well as hemogram parameters, fecal occult blood, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force—Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic scores; Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment scores; and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group enteritis grades were monitored during treatment and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics (age, tumor stage, pathology, and surgical history) were balanced between groups (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Compared with the control group, the experimental group showed significantly lower levels of C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, interleukin 6, and fecal occult blood positivity rates (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Clinical assessments also indicated lower Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force–Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment scores and milder Radiation Therapy Oncology Group enteritis grading in the hydrogen group (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Importantly, no significant difference in tumor response was observed between groups based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, suggesting that hydrogen therapy did not interfere with the antitumor efficacy of CCRT. No adverse events related to hydrogen inhalation were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Hydrogen inhalation is a safe and effective adjunctive therapy that significantly alleviates inflammation and mitigates clinical symptoms of ARE in patients with cervical cancer who are undergoing CCRT, without compromising antitumor treatment outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 11","pages":"Article 101879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Analysis of Radiation-Induced Morphea of the Breast: A Proof-of-Concept Study 磁共振成像放射学分析辐射引起的乳房睡眠:一项概念验证研究
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101881
Jieying Wu MD , Joseph Bae MS , Chao Chen PhD , Samuel Ryu MD , Daniel Lozeau MD , Alexander Stessin MD, PhD , Prateek Prasanna PhD

Purpose

Radiation-induced morphea (RIM) is a very rare but devastating side effect of breast radiation therapy, characterized by progressive skin induration, pain, and discoloration, with no effective treatments currently available. This is a proof-of-concept study that aims to identify radiomic features from pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans associated with the development of RIM in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy.

Methods and Materials

This is a retrospective analysis of a single institutional registry of patients who received diagnosis of RIM following breast radiation therapy from 2008 to 2022. Clinical and histopathological data were reviewed. Pretreatment MRI scans of these patients and matched controls were analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted from whole breast and fibroglandular tissue regions of interest. A total of 528 radiomic features were compared between patients who developed RIM and those who did not, using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to identify statistically significant differences.

Results

We evaluated 10 patients who received clinical diagnosis of RIM, with a mean age of 63 years (range, 44-75 years). Among these, 7 patients had biopsy-proven RIM. Both clinical and histologic findings were correlated with radiomic analyses. Forty percent of the patients had a history of autoimmune disorders, including hypothyroidism, Graves’ disease, systemic sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiomic analysis identified 11 significant features, primarily related to tissue structure and texture. Nine of these features were from the contralateral breast, and 2 were from the ipsilateral breast.

Conclusions

This is a pilot study on a small sample that demonstrates that radiomic features extracted from pretreatment MRI scans can serve as potential predictors for the development of RIM in patients with breast cancer. The integration of clinical and histopathological data with radiomic analysis highlights the distinct changes in breast tissue architecture that precede RIM onset. These findings pave the way for the early identification of patients at risk, allowing for more personalized surveillance and management strategies.
目的:放射诱导的皮肤坏死(RIM)是乳房放射治疗中一种非常罕见但具有破坏性的副作用,其特征是进行性皮肤硬化、疼痛和变色,目前尚无有效的治疗方法。这是一项概念验证性研究,旨在确定预处理磁共振成像(MRI)扫描与接受放射治疗的乳腺癌患者RIM发展相关的放射学特征。方法和材料本研究是对2008年至2022年接受乳房放射治疗后诊断为RIM的单一机构登记患者的回顾性分析。回顾了临床和组织病理学资料。分析了这些患者和匹配对照的预处理MRI扫描结果。从整个乳房和感兴趣的纤维腺组织区域提取放射学特征。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,对发生RIM的患者和未发生RIM的患者进行了528项放射学特征的比较,以确定具有统计学意义的差异。结果我们评估了10例临床诊断为RIM的患者,平均年龄63岁(44-75岁)。其中7例经活检证实为RIM。临床和组织学结果均与放射组学分析相关。40%的患者有自身免疫性疾病史,包括甲状腺功能减退、格雷夫斯病、系统性硬化症和系统性红斑狼疮。放射组学分析确定了11个重要特征,主要与组织结构和质地有关。其中9例来自对侧乳房,2例来自同侧乳房。结论:这是一项小样本的试点研究,表明从预处理MRI扫描中提取的放射学特征可以作为乳腺癌患者RIM发展的潜在预测因素。临床和组织病理学数据与放射组学分析的整合突出了RIM发病前乳腺组织结构的明显变化。这些发现为早期识别有风险的患者铺平了道路,允许更个性化的监测和管理策略。
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Analysis of Radiation-Induced Morphea of the Breast: A Proof-of-Concept Study","authors":"Jieying Wu MD ,&nbsp;Joseph Bae MS ,&nbsp;Chao Chen PhD ,&nbsp;Samuel Ryu MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Lozeau MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Stessin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Prateek Prasanna PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Radiation-induced morphea (RIM) is a very rare but devastating side effect of breast radiation therapy, characterized by progressive skin induration, pain, and discoloration, with no effective treatments currently available. This is a proof-of-concept study that aims to identify radiomic features from pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans associated with the development of RIM in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>This is a retrospective analysis of a single institutional registry of patients who received diagnosis of RIM following breast radiation therapy from 2008 to 2022. Clinical and histopathological data were reviewed. Pretreatment MRI scans of these patients and matched controls were analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted from whole breast and fibroglandular tissue regions of interest. A total of 528 radiomic features were compared between patients who developed RIM and those who did not, using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to identify statistically significant differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We evaluated 10 patients who received clinical diagnosis of RIM, with a mean age of 63 years (range, 44-75 years). Among these, 7 patients had biopsy-proven RIM. Both clinical and histologic findings were correlated with radiomic analyses. Forty percent of the patients had a history of autoimmune disorders, including hypothyroidism, Graves’ disease, systemic sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiomic analysis identified 11 significant features, primarily related to tissue structure and texture. Nine of these features were from the contralateral breast, and 2 were from the ipsilateral breast.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This is a pilot study on a small sample that demonstrates that radiomic features extracted from pretreatment MRI scans can serve as potential predictors for the development of RIM in patients with breast cancer. The integration of clinical and histopathological data with radiomic analysis highlights the distinct changes in breast tissue architecture that precede RIM onset. These findings pave the way for the early identification of patients at risk, allowing for more personalized surveillance and management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 11","pages":"Article 101881"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145119617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are There High-Risk Prognostic Factors for Isolated Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Mastectomy Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy? 早期乳腺癌行乳房切除术而不进行辅助放疗的患者孤立性局部复发是否存在高危预后因素?
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101877
Giuseppe Facondo MD , Chiara Reverberi MD , Agnese Prisco MD , Tino Ceschia MD , Gianluca Vullo MD , Giuseppe Aprile MD , Alessandro Marco Minisini MD , Luca Seriau MD , Serena Bertozzi MD , Carla Cedolini MD , Marco Trovò MD

Purpose

This study aims to investigate whether there are subgroups of patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with radical mastectomy that are at high risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and could benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed patients with early-stage BC treated with mastectomy at our institution between December 2009 and December 2018. Tumors were classified according to molecular subtype and known prognostic factors. Outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test, while Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to estimate hazard ratios for evaluating associations between prognostic factors and survival. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 670 patients who met the selection criteria were identified. Median age was 59.4 years (IQR, 48-72), and the median follow-up was 107.1 months (IQR, 80.3-138.6). Among the cohort, 257 patients (38.3%) had T2 tumors, 249 (37.1%) were pN1, 186 (27.8%) had grade 3 tumors, 134 (20%) presented with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 116 (17.3%) were HER2-positive, and 55 (8.2%) had triple-negative disease. LRR rates at 2, 5, and 8 years were 1.4%, 2.9%, and 3.5%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the presence of LVI, G3, tumor size (T), nodal involvement (pN1), estrogen receptor-negative status, triple-negative phenotype, and Ki-67 expression were significantly associated with an increased risk of LRR. Notably, LVI-positive patients had significantly higher locoregional and regional recurrence rates at 8 years (9.5% and 9.4%, respectively) compared to LVI-negative patients (1% and 1.1%). Multivariate analysis confirmed LVI as a strong and independent predictor of recurrence across all models.

Conclusions

This study confirms the prognostic relevance of several pathologic factors in predicting LRR, with particular emphasis on the independent role of LVI, in patients with early-stage BC treated with mastectomy and not receiving PMRT. In patients with early-stage BC with T1-T2 tumors and 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes with the presence of LVI, PMRT should be considered.
目的本研究旨在探讨乳腺癌根治术患者中是否存在局部复发(LRR)风险高的亚组,这些亚组可以从乳房切除术后放射治疗(PMRT)中获益。方法和材料我们回顾性分析了2009年12月至2018年12月在我院接受乳房切除术治疗的早期乳腺癌患者。根据分子亚型和已知预后因素对肿瘤进行分类。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计结果。采用log-rank检验进行单因素分析,采用Cox比例风险回归估计风险比,评估预后因素与生存率之间的相关性。P值为<; 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果共筛选出670例符合入选标准的患者。中位年龄59.4岁(IQR, 48 ~ 72),中位随访107.1个月(IQR, 80.3 ~ 138.6)。在队列中,T2肿瘤257例(38.3%),pN1 249例(37.1%),3级肿瘤186例(27.8%),淋巴血管侵袭(LVI) 134例(20%),her2阳性116例(17.3%),三阴性55例(8.2%)。2年、5年和8年的LRR利率分别为1.4%、2.9%和3.5%。在单因素分析中,LVI、G3、肿瘤大小(T)、淋巴结累及(pN1)、雌激素受体阴性状态、三阴性表型和Ki-67表达的存在与LRR风险增加显著相关。值得注意的是,lvi阳性患者在8年的局部和区域复发率(分别为9.5%和9.4%)明显高于lvi阴性患者(1%和1.1%)。多变量分析证实LVI是所有模型中复发的强大且独立的预测因子。结论:本研究证实了几个病理因素在预测LRR方面的预后相关性,特别强调了LVI在早期乳腺癌切除术且未接受PMRT患者中的独立作用。早期BC伴T1-T2肿瘤及1-3个腋窝淋巴结阳性伴LVI的患者,应考虑PMRT。
{"title":"Are There High-Risk Prognostic Factors for Isolated Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Mastectomy Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy?","authors":"Giuseppe Facondo MD ,&nbsp;Chiara Reverberi MD ,&nbsp;Agnese Prisco MD ,&nbsp;Tino Ceschia MD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Vullo MD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Aprile MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Marco Minisini MD ,&nbsp;Luca Seriau MD ,&nbsp;Serena Bertozzi MD ,&nbsp;Carla Cedolini MD ,&nbsp;Marco Trovò MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101877","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101877","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to investigate whether there are subgroups of patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with radical mastectomy that are at high risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and could benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients with early-stage BC treated with mastectomy at our institution between December 2009 and December 2018. Tumors were classified according to molecular subtype and known prognostic factors. Outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test, while Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to estimate hazard ratios for evaluating associations between prognostic factors and survival. A <em>P</em> value of &lt;.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 670 patients who met the selection criteria were identified. Median age was 59.4 years (IQR, 48-72), and the median follow-up was 107.1 months (IQR, 80.3-138.6). Among the cohort, 257 patients (38.3%) had T2 tumors, 249 (37.1%) were pN1, 186 (27.8%) had grade 3 tumors, 134 (20%) presented with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 116 (17.3%) were HER2-positive, and 55 (8.2%) had triple-negative disease. LRR rates at 2, 5, and 8 years were 1.4%, 2.9%, and 3.5%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the presence of LVI, G3, tumor size (T), nodal involvement (pN1), estrogen receptor-negative status, triple-negative phenotype, and Ki-67 expression were significantly associated with an increased risk of LRR. Notably, LVI-positive patients had significantly higher locoregional and regional recurrence rates at 8 years (9.5% and 9.4%, respectively) compared to LVI-negative patients (1% and 1.1%). Multivariate analysis confirmed LVI as a strong and independent predictor of recurrence across all models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study confirms the prognostic relevance of several pathologic factors in predicting LRR, with particular emphasis on the independent role of LVI, in patients with early-stage BC treated with mastectomy and not receiving PMRT. In patients with early-stage BC with T1-T2 tumors and 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes with the presence of LVI, PMRT should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 11","pages":"Article 101877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145262942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interim Analysis of Pro-Grid: A Phase 1 Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Trial Pro-Grid的中期分析:一期质子空间分割放射治疗试验
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101857
Khadija Sheikh PhD , Anh Tran MSc , Heng Li PhD , Anna W. LaVigne MD , Jean L. Wright MD , Aditya Halthore MD

Purpose

Spatial fractionation (SFRT) is a radiation therapy technique that targets bulky tumors by delivering alternating high and low doses within the tumor. Here, we report an interim analysis of a phase 1 trial examining the feasibility and safety of a novel proton SFRT approach.

Methods and Materials

Ten patients with unresectable tumors of varying histopathology measuring at least 7 cm in the palliative setting were enrolled in a prospective phase 1 trial. Robust pencil-beam scanning proton SFRT plans were created using cylindrical (grid) targets within gross tumor treated to a prescription dose of 18 Gy in a single fraction. Quality assurance computed tomography imaging (qCT) was performed before treatment delivery.

Results

Four patients had breast primaries, 3 patients had lung primaries, and 3 patients had pelvic primaries. Five patients had prior photon treatment to a different site. Eight patients received additional planned normofractionated radiation therapy totaling an average dose of 30 Gy. Median time from SFRT treatment to last follow-up was 25 weeks (range, 4-60 weeks). Gross tumor volume ranged from 151 cm³ to 1638 cm³. All qCTs maintained robustness, with no re-planning needed. At last follow-up, 40% showed partial response, 20% had stable disease, and 40% experienced disease progression, with half progressing in the treated area. One patient with pelvic treatment developed grade 3 small bowel obstruction, followed by late grade 2 obstructions. No other patients had grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities attributable to the proton SFRT.

Conclusions

Spatial fractionation using a novel pencil-beam scanning SFRT technique was technically feasible to deliver and reliable on robust evaluation of qCT in this small prospective cohort of patients with difficult-to-manage bulky tumors. Proton SFRT appears safe even when additional normofractionated radiation therapy is delivered. Some bulky tumors exhibited significant response to proton SFRT; thus, further work elucidating which patients most benefit from this technique is warranted.
空间分割(SFRT)是一种通过在肿瘤内交替输送高、低剂量来靶向大体积肿瘤的放射治疗技术。在这里,我们报告了一项1期试验的中期分析,该试验检验了一种新型质子SFRT方法的可行性和安全性。方法和材料:在姑息治疗环境下,不可切除的不同组织病理学肿瘤至少为7厘米的患者被纳入前瞻性1期试验。稳健的铅笔束扫描质子SFRT计划是使用圆柱形(网格)靶标在总体肿瘤内治疗到处方剂量为18 Gy的单个部分。质量保证在治疗交付前进行计算机断层成像(qCT)。结果乳腺原发4例,肺原发3例,盆腔原发3例。5例患者先前接受过不同部位的光子治疗。8名患者接受了额外的计划放射治疗,平均剂量为30 Gy。从SFRT治疗到最后一次随访的中位时间为25周(范围4-60周)。大体肿瘤体积为151 ~ 1638 cm³。所有的qct都保持了健壮性,不需要重新规划。在最后一次随访中,40%表现出部分缓解,20%病情稳定,40%出现疾病进展,其中一半在治疗区域进展。1例接受盆腔治疗的患者出现3级小肠梗阻,随后出现2级晚期梗阻。没有其他患者有3级或更高级别的急性或晚期毒性归因于质子SFRT。结论:使用新型铅笔束扫描SFRT技术进行空间分割在技术上是可行的,并且在难以处理的大体积肿瘤患者的小前瞻性队列中可靠地进行了qCT的稳健评估。质子SFRT是安全的,即使在额外的正放射治疗的情况下。一些体积较大的肿瘤对质子SFRT有明显的反应;因此,进一步阐明哪些患者最受益于这项技术是有必要的。
{"title":"Interim Analysis of Pro-Grid: A Phase 1 Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Trial","authors":"Khadija Sheikh PhD ,&nbsp;Anh Tran MSc ,&nbsp;Heng Li PhD ,&nbsp;Anna W. LaVigne MD ,&nbsp;Jean L. Wright MD ,&nbsp;Aditya Halthore MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101857","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101857","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Spatial fractionation (SFRT) is a radiation therapy technique that targets bulky tumors by delivering alternating high and low doses within the tumor. Here, we report an interim analysis of a phase 1 trial examining the feasibility and safety of a novel proton SFRT approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Ten patients with unresectable tumors of varying histopathology measuring at least 7 cm in the palliative setting were enrolled in a prospective phase 1 trial. Robust pencil-beam scanning proton SFRT plans were created using cylindrical (grid) targets within gross tumor treated to a prescription dose of 18 Gy in a single fraction. Quality assurance computed tomography imaging (qCT) was performed before treatment delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four patients had breast primaries, 3 patients had lung primaries, and 3 patients had pelvic primaries. Five patients had prior photon treatment to a different site. Eight patients received additional planned normofractionated radiation therapy totaling an average dose of 30 Gy. Median time from SFRT treatment to last follow-up was 25 weeks (range, 4-60 weeks). Gross tumor volume ranged from 151 cm³ to 1638 cm³. All qCTs maintained robustness, with no re-planning needed. At last follow-up, 40% showed partial response, 20% had stable disease, and 40% experienced disease progression, with half progressing in the treated area. One patient with pelvic treatment developed grade 3 small bowel obstruction, followed by late grade 2 obstructions. No other patients had grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities attributable to the proton SFRT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spatial fractionation using a novel pencil-beam scanning SFRT technique was technically feasible to deliver and reliable on robust evaluation of qCT in this small prospective cohort of patients with difficult-to-manage bulky tumors. Proton SFRT appears safe even when additional normofractionated radiation therapy is delivered. Some bulky tumors exhibited significant response to proton SFRT; thus, further work elucidating which patients most benefit from this technique is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 9","pages":"Article 101857"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144781500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum to ‘Integrating Radiosensitivity Index and Radiation Resistance Related Index Improves Prostate Cancer Outcome Prediction’ [Advances in Radiation Oncology (2025) 10, 101713] “整合放射敏感性指数和放射耐药相关指数提高前列腺癌预后预测”的勘误[放射肿瘤学进展(2025)10,101713]
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101830
Qi-Qiao Wu MD , Zhao-Sheng Yin MD , Yi Zhang MD , Yu-Fu Lin MD , Jun-Rong Jiang BS , Ruo-Yan Zheng BS , Tao Jiang MD , Dong-Xu Lin MD , Peng Lai MD , Fan Chao PhD , Xin-Yue Wang MD , Bu-Fu Tang PhD , Shi-Suo Du PhD , Jing Sun MD , Ping Yang MD , Zhao-Chong Zeng PhD
{"title":"Erratum to ‘Integrating Radiosensitivity Index and Radiation Resistance Related Index Improves Prostate Cancer Outcome Prediction’ [Advances in Radiation Oncology (2025) 10, 101713]","authors":"Qi-Qiao Wu MD ,&nbsp;Zhao-Sheng Yin MD ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Yu-Fu Lin MD ,&nbsp;Jun-Rong Jiang BS ,&nbsp;Ruo-Yan Zheng BS ,&nbsp;Tao Jiang MD ,&nbsp;Dong-Xu Lin MD ,&nbsp;Peng Lai MD ,&nbsp;Fan Chao PhD ,&nbsp;Xin-Yue Wang MD ,&nbsp;Bu-Fu Tang PhD ,&nbsp;Shi-Suo Du PhD ,&nbsp;Jing Sun MD ,&nbsp;Ping Yang MD ,&nbsp;Zhao-Chong Zeng PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101830","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101830","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 8","pages":"Article 101830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144831579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case Volume and Experience in Stereotactic Radiation: Analysis of a Prospective Peer Review Program 立体定向放射的病例量和经验:一个前瞻性同行评议项目的分析
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101875
Luke Peng MD , Kee-Young Shin MS , Tara Kosak MEd , Ayal A. Aizer MD , John G. Phillips MD, MPH , Itai M. Pashtan MD

Purpose

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is highly effective but carries the risk of significant toxicity. We identified factors associated with SRT plans that require revision in a comprehensive, prospective peer review program conducted across a network of affiliated radiation oncology centers.

Methods and Materials

Weekly peer review rounds were conducted to review SRT cases prior to the start of radiation. Revision recommendations were tracked. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with case revision.

Results

From 2019 to 2024, 1172 SRT cases were reviewed at weekly rounds, including 313 brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 190 brain multi-fractionated SRS, and 669 stereotactic body radiation therapy. The yearly revision rate ranged from 19% in 2020 to 31% in 2024. There were 16 individual treating physicians with a median of 6 years of experience (range, 1-19 years), measured at the time of each SRT case review. Factors assessed for significance included SRT case volume in the 3 months preceding review (dichotomized as low- or high-volume), physician experience (≤2, 3-9, or ≥10 years), SRT technique (SRS, multi-fractionated SRS, or stereotactic body radiation therapy, and disease site. On multivariable logistic regression, revisions were less likely for high-volume physicians (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77), those with 3-9 years of experience (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96), and SRS technique (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84).

Conclusions

These data imply high value to prospective peer review for physicians with low SRT case volume and in their early career. Adequate case volume may be a critical factor for high quality SRT, analogous to the surgical literature. Annual revision rates in the program remained substantial over time, demonstrating the ongoing importance of an effective prospective peer review program for SRT.
目的立体定向放射治疗(SRT)是一种非常有效的放射治疗方法,但具有明显的毒性风险。我们确定了与SRT计划相关的因素,这些因素需要在一个综合的、前瞻性的同行评审项目中进行修订,该项目在附属放射肿瘤学中心网络中进行。方法和材料每周进行同行评议,在放疗开始前对SRT病例进行评议。对修订建议进行了跟踪。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定与病例修订相关的因素。结果2019年至2024年,每周回顾1172例SRT病例,其中脑立体定向放射外科(SRS) 313例,脑多分割SRS 190例,体立体定向放射治疗669例。年修正率从2020年的19%到2024年的31%不等。在每个SRT病例回顾时,有16位治疗医生,平均经验为6年(范围1-19年)。评估显著性的因素包括回顾前3个月的SRT病例量(分为低量或高量)、医生经验(≤2年、3-9年或≥10年)、SRT技术(SRS、多分步SRS或立体定向体放射治疗)和疾病部位。在多变量logistic回归中,大容量医生(优势比[OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77)、具有3-9年经验的医生(OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96)和SRS技术(OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84)的修订可能性较小。结论这些数据对低SRT病例量和职业生涯早期的医生的前瞻性同行评议具有很高的价值。足够的病例量可能是高质量SRT的关键因素,类似于外科文献。随着时间的推移,该项目的年度修订率保持了可观的水平,这表明了一个有效的前瞻性同行评审项目对SRT的持续重要性。
{"title":"Case Volume and Experience in Stereotactic Radiation: Analysis of a Prospective Peer Review Program","authors":"Luke Peng MD ,&nbsp;Kee-Young Shin MS ,&nbsp;Tara Kosak MEd ,&nbsp;Ayal A. Aizer MD ,&nbsp;John G. Phillips MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Itai M. Pashtan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101875","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101875","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is highly effective but carries the risk of significant toxicity. We identified factors associated with SRT plans that require revision in a comprehensive, prospective peer review program conducted across a network of affiliated radiation oncology centers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Weekly peer review rounds were conducted to review SRT cases prior to the start of radiation. Revision recommendations were tracked. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with case revision.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2019 to 2024, 1172 SRT cases were reviewed at weekly rounds, including 313 brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 190 brain multi-fractionated SRS, and 669 stereotactic body radiation therapy. The yearly revision rate ranged from 19% in 2020 to 31% in 2024. There were 16 individual treating physicians with a median of 6 years of experience (range, 1-19 years), measured at the time of each SRT case review. Factors assessed for significance included SRT case volume in the 3 months preceding review (dichotomized as low- or high-volume), physician experience (≤2, 3-9, or ≥10 years), SRT technique (SRS, multi-fractionated SRS, or stereotactic body radiation therapy, and disease site. On multivariable logistic regression, revisions were less likely for high-volume physicians (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77), those with 3-9 years of experience (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96), and SRS technique (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These data imply high value to prospective peer review for physicians with low SRT case volume and in their early career. Adequate case volume may be a critical factor for high quality SRT, analogous to the surgical literature. Annual revision rates in the program remained substantial over time, demonstrating the ongoing importance of an effective prospective peer review program for SRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 10","pages":"Article 101875"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144921740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of Atlas and Neural Network Autosegmentation Methods for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation With the Development of a Knowledge-Based Quality Assurance Tool 基于知识质量保证工具的儿童颅脊柱辐照图谱与神经网络自分割方法的比较分析
IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101847
Ozgur Ates , James Man Git Tsui , Zachary Wooten , Sydney Hutcheson , Rico Zhang , Jared Becksfort , Thomas E. Merchant , Chia-ho Hua

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the performance of Atlas and neural network autosegmentation methods and develop a knowledge-based quality assurance (QA) tool for pediatric craniospinal irradiation (CSI).

Methods and Materials

Autosegmentation was performed on 63 CSI patients using 3 methods: Atlas, commercial artificial intelligence (AI), and in-house AI. The performance of these methods was analyzed using 13 quantitative metrics, comprising 6 overlap and 7 distance metrics, across 13 critical organs and a linear mixed-effect model analysis was performed. Additionally, a knowledge-based QA tool was developed by leveraging distinctive computed tomography number distributions from 100 CSI patients for each organ, using the kernel density estimation (KDE) method to ensure robust error detection and validation. The QA tool was tested on 50 CSI cases by comparing baseline KDEs from 100 CSI patients.

Results

The linear mixed-effect analysis showed that the in-house AI outperformed both the Atlas and commercial AI methods in overlap and distance metrics. The in-house AI outperformed the commercial AI with a higher average overlap of 0.01 ± 0.01 and surpassed the Atlas method by 0.02 ± 0.01. In terms of distance metrics, the in-house AI matched the commercial AI (–0.31 ± 0.72 mm) and exceeded the Atlas method by 3.10 ± 0.68 mm. Paired t-tests showed the in-house AI was superior to the Atlas in 13.0% of cases, while the Atlas outperformed the in-house method in 8.9% of comparisons. Similarly, the in-house AI was better than the commercial AI in 35.3% of tests, with the commercial AI outperforming in 32.7%. The QA tool results demonstrated that 100% agreement with baseline KDEs occurred in 46.4% of tests for Atlas, 46.5% for the commercial AI, and 60.7% for the in-house AI.

Conclusions

The in-house AI excelled over the Atlas and commercial AI methods in autosegmentation accuracy for pediatric CSI patients. Furthermore, a knowledge-based QA tool enables clinicians to detect and correct gross errors in autosegmentation.
目的评估Atlas和神经网络自动分割方法的性能,开发基于知识的儿童颅脊髓照射(CSI)质量保证(QA)工具。方法和材料采用Atlas、商业人工智能(AI)和内部人工智能(AI) 3种方法对63例CSI患者进行自动分割。使用13个定量指标(包括6个重叠指标和7个距离指标)对13个关键器官的这些方法的性能进行了分析,并进行了线性混合效应模型分析。此外,通过利用来自100名CSI患者的每个器官的不同计算机断层扫描数量分布,使用核密度估计(KDE)方法开发了基于知识的QA工具,以确保稳健的错误检测和验证。通过比较100名CSI患者的基线kde,在50例CSI病例中测试了QA工具。结果线性混合效应分析表明,内部人工智能在重叠和距离指标上优于Atlas和商业人工智能方法。内部人工智能的平均重叠度为0.01±0.01,优于商业人工智能,超过Atlas方法0.02±0.01。在距离度量方面,内部人工智能与商用人工智能(-0.31±0.72 mm)相当,比Atlas方法高出3.10±0.68 mm。配对t检验显示,在13.0%的情况下,内部人工智能优于Atlas,而Atlas在8.9%的比较中优于内部方法。同样,内部人工智能在35.3%的测试中优于商业人工智能,商业人工智能在32.7%的测试中优于商业人工智能。QA工具结果表明,46.4%的Atlas测试、46.5%的商业AI测试和60.7%的内部AI测试与基线kde 100%一致。结论室内人工智能在儿童CSI患者的自动分割精度上优于Atlas和商业人工智能方法。此外,基于知识的QA工具使临床医生能够检测和纠正自动分割中的严重错误。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Atlas and Neural Network Autosegmentation Methods for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation With the Development of a Knowledge-Based Quality Assurance Tool","authors":"Ozgur Ates ,&nbsp;James Man Git Tsui ,&nbsp;Zachary Wooten ,&nbsp;Sydney Hutcheson ,&nbsp;Rico Zhang ,&nbsp;Jared Becksfort ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Merchant ,&nbsp;Chia-ho Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101847","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101847","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the performance of Atlas and neural network autosegmentation methods and develop a knowledge-based quality assurance (QA) tool for pediatric craniospinal irradiation (CSI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Autosegmentation was performed on 63 CSI patients using 3 methods: Atlas, commercial artificial intelligence (AI), and in-house AI. The performance of these methods was analyzed using 13 quantitative metrics, comprising 6 overlap and 7 distance metrics, across 13 critical organs and a linear mixed-effect model analysis was performed. Additionally, a knowledge-based QA tool was developed by leveraging distinctive computed tomography number distributions from 100 CSI patients for each organ, using the kernel density estimation (KDE) method to ensure robust error detection and validation. The QA tool was tested on 50 CSI cases by comparing baseline KDEs from 100 CSI patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The linear mixed-effect analysis showed that the in-house AI outperformed both the Atlas and commercial AI methods in overlap and distance metrics. The in-house AI outperformed the commercial AI with a higher average overlap of 0.01 ± 0.01 and surpassed the Atlas method by 0.02 ± 0.01. In terms of distance metrics, the in-house AI matched the commercial AI (–0.31 ± 0.72 mm) and exceeded the Atlas method by 3.10 ± 0.68 mm. Paired t-tests showed the in-house AI was superior to the Atlas in 13.0% of cases, while the Atlas outperformed the in-house method in 8.9% of comparisons. Similarly, the in-house AI was better than the commercial AI in 35.3% of tests, with the commercial AI outperforming in 32.7%. The QA tool results demonstrated that 100% agreement with baseline KDEs occurred in 46.4% of tests for Atlas, 46.5% for the commercial AI, and 60.7% for the in-house AI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The in-house AI excelled over the Atlas and commercial AI methods in autosegmentation accuracy for pediatric CSI patients. Furthermore, a knowledge-based QA tool enables clinicians to detect and correct gross errors in autosegmentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 9","pages":"Article 101847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144712950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing Workflow for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy Toward Reduced Physician Involvement 优化基于锥形束计算机断层成像的在线适应性放射治疗的工作流程,以减少医生的介入
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101874
Goda Kalinauskaite MD , Luise A. Künzel PhD , Anne Kluge PhD , Kerstin Rubarth PhD , Jakob Dannehl , Celina Höhne , Marcus Beck MD , Daniel Zips MD , Carolin Senger MD

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of an optimized online adaptive radiation therapy workflow on physician involvement.

Methods and Materials

Data from a prospective phase 2 trial involving 34 prostate cancer patients treated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (62 Gy in 20 fractions) were analyzed. Manual interventions were required for 2 steps in the workflow: radiation therapy technologist review and adjustment of automatically segmented organs, guiding target segmentation, so-called “influencer,” while physicians reviewed and refined the targets. Three different workflows were compared: 2-influencer (rectum and bladder), 3-influencer (+prostate), and 5-influencer (+seminal vesicles and bowel). Time for workflow steps, extent of manual corrections, and target volume changes were compared.

Results

A total of 613 fractions were analyzed. The 5-influencer workflow reduced manual target corrections to 11% of fractions compared with 51% for the 3-influencer workflow and 61% for the 2-influencer workflow (P < .001). Median session duration across workflows was 24.0 minutes (IQR, 22.0-28.0). Median target review times were shortest with the 5-influencer workflow at 2.5 minutes compared with 5.0 minutes for the 3-influencer workflow (P < .001) and 5.6 minutes for the 2-influencer workflow (P = .002). Most patients (84%) found the treatment time well tolerable.

Conclusions

This study of prostate cancer patients suggests that optimized workflow reduces the need for physician involvement in online CBCT guided adaptive radiation therapy. Optimized workflows may facilitate a more radiation therapy technologist-driven approach similar to standard image guided radiation therapy. Further studies in other cancers, also focusing on clinical endpoints, are needed to further improve CBCT guided online adaptive radiation therapy.
目的评价优化的在线适应性放射治疗工作流程对医师参与的影响。方法和材料对一项前瞻性2期试验的数据进行分析,该试验涉及34名前列腺癌患者,他们接受了基于锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的在线适应性放射治疗(62 Gy,分20个部分)。工作流程中的2个步骤需要人工干预:放射治疗技术专家审查和调整自动分割的器官,指导目标分割,所谓的“影响者”,而医生审查和完善目标。比较了三种不同的工作流程:2影响者(直肠和膀胱)、3影响者(+前列腺)和5影响者(+精囊和肠道)。比较了工作流程步骤的时间、手动更正的范围和目标量更改。结果共分析了613个组分。5个影响者工作流将人工目标修正率降低到11%,而3个影响者工作流为51%,2个影响者工作流为61% (P < .001)。跨工作流的中位会话持续时间为24.0分钟(IQR, 22.0-28.0)。5位影响者工作流程的目标审查时间中位数最短,为2.5分钟,而3位影响者工作流程为5.0分钟(P < .001), 2位影响者工作流程为5.6分钟(P = .002)。大多数患者(84%)认为治疗时间可耐受。结论:这项针对前列腺癌患者的研究表明,优化的工作流程减少了医生参与在线CBCT引导的适应性放射治疗的需要。优化的工作流程可以促进更多的放射治疗技术驱动的方法,类似于标准的图像引导放射治疗。其他癌症的进一步研究,也关注临床终点,需要进一步改进CBCT引导的在线适应性放射治疗。
{"title":"Optimizing Workflow for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy Toward Reduced Physician Involvement","authors":"Goda Kalinauskaite MD ,&nbsp;Luise A. Künzel PhD ,&nbsp;Anne Kluge PhD ,&nbsp;Kerstin Rubarth PhD ,&nbsp;Jakob Dannehl ,&nbsp;Celina Höhne ,&nbsp;Marcus Beck MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Zips MD ,&nbsp;Carolin Senger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101874","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101874","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of an optimized online adaptive radiation therapy workflow on physician involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Data from a prospective phase 2 trial involving 34 prostate cancer patients treated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (62 Gy in 20 fractions) were analyzed. Manual interventions were required for 2 steps in the workflow: radiation therapy technologist review and adjustment of automatically segmented organs, guiding target segmentation, so-called “influencer,” while physicians reviewed and refined the targets. Three different workflows were compared: 2-influencer (rectum and bladder), 3-influencer (+prostate), and 5-influencer (+seminal vesicles and bowel). Time for workflow steps, extent of manual corrections, and target volume changes were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 613 fractions were analyzed. The 5-influencer workflow reduced manual target corrections to 11% of fractions compared with 51% for the 3-influencer workflow and 61% for the 2-influencer workflow (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Median session duration across workflows was 24.0 minutes (IQR, 22.0-28.0). Median target review times were shortest with the 5-influencer workflow at 2.5 minutes compared with 5.0 minutes for the 3-influencer workflow (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 5.6 minutes for the 2-influencer workflow (<em>P</em> = .002). Most patients (84%) found the treatment time well tolerable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study of prostate cancer patients suggests that optimized workflow reduces the need for physician involvement in online CBCT guided adaptive radiation therapy. Optimized workflows may facilitate a more radiation therapy technologist-driven approach similar to standard image guided radiation therapy. Further studies in other cancers, also focusing on clinical endpoints, are needed to further improve CBCT guided online adaptive radiation therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 10","pages":"Article 101874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144912305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Osteoradionecrosis of the Hyoid Bone: A Systematic Review 舌骨放射性骨坏死:系统综述
IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101873
Quentin H. Drane BS , Andrea Ziegler MD , Eric J. Thorpe MD

Purpose

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a serious complication following radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancers, commonly affecting the mandible, but is less understood when involving the hyoid bone.

Methods and Materials

A literature review through PubMed and Scopus identified 16 relevant articles. Patient characteristics, presentation, imaging findings, management, and outcomes are highlighted.

Results

The review found 40 cases of hyoid bone ORN, with an average patient age of 60.0 years. Most patients were male (87.5%) and had oropharyngeal tumors (77.5%). The average RT dose was 66.2 Gy, and ORN typically developed 27.6 months after RT. Patients receiving concurrent radiation and chemotherapy were more likely to need surgery compared with those treated with RT alone (80% vs 30%, P = .0042).

Conclusions

While rare, hyoid bone ORN may become more common with increasing rates of oropharyngeal cancers. Clinicians should be aware of presenting symptoms and possible complications and be familiar with a thorough work-up and treatment.
目的:骨放射性坏死(ORN)是头颈癌放疗后的严重并发症,通常影响下颌骨,但对舌骨的影响知之甚少。方法和材料通过PubMed和Scopus进行文献综述,确定了16篇相关文章。强调了患者的特征、表现、影像学表现、管理和结果。结果本组共发现舌骨ORN 40例,平均年龄60.0岁。男性居多(87.5%),口咽肿瘤居多(77.5%)。平均放疗剂量为66.2 Gy,通常在放疗后27.6个月发生ORN。与仅接受放疗的患者相比,同时接受放疗和化疗的患者更有可能需要手术(80% vs 30%, P = 0.0042)。结论舌骨ORN虽然罕见,但随着口咽癌发病率的增加,可能会变得越来越常见。临床医生应该意识到出现的症状和可能的并发症,并熟悉彻底的检查和治疗。
{"title":"Osteoradionecrosis of the Hyoid Bone: A Systematic Review","authors":"Quentin H. Drane BS ,&nbsp;Andrea Ziegler MD ,&nbsp;Eric J. Thorpe MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101873","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101873","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a serious complication following radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancers, commonly affecting the mandible, but is less understood when involving the hyoid bone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A literature review through PubMed and Scopus identified 16 relevant articles. Patient characteristics, presentation, imaging findings, management, and outcomes are highlighted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review found 40 cases of hyoid bone ORN, with an average patient age of 60.0 years. Most patients were male (87.5%) and had oropharyngeal tumors (77.5%). The average RT dose was 66.2 Gy, and ORN typically developed 27.6 months after RT. Patients receiving concurrent radiation and chemotherapy were more likely to need surgery compared with those treated with RT alone (80% vs 30%, <em>P</em> = .0042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While rare, hyoid bone ORN may become more common with increasing rates of oropharyngeal cancers. Clinicians should be aware of presenting symptoms and possible complications and be familiar with a thorough work-up and treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 10","pages":"Article 101873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144888678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1