Erica Nakajima, Paul Leger, Ingrid A Mayer, Michael N Neuss, David D Chism, W Kimryn Rathmell
We report a case of severe type B lactic acidosis (LA) in a 51-year-old male, 12 days after he received his first dose of nivolumab for metastatic Von Hippel Lindau (VHL)-mutated, clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Throughout his hospital course, infection, hypoperfusion, and tissue necrosis were not identified. We propose that his LA may have resulted from either inherent tumor glycolysis or immune activation and enhanced metabolism. The patient's course was complicated by acute renal failure, and his LA rose progressively, eventually necessitating daily hemodialysis (HD). After receiving five consecutive days of HD, the patient started everolimus daily with the intent of reducing glycolytic metabolism. Subsequently, the rate of lactic acid production slowed, and HD was no longer required after two doses of everolimus. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of type B LA following nivolumab administration, and the use of everolimus to treat type B LA in a patient with renal cancer.
{"title":"A Case Report of Severe Type B Lactic Acidosis Following First Dose of Nivolumab in a VHL-Mutated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Erica Nakajima, Paul Leger, Ingrid A Mayer, Michael N Neuss, David D Chism, W Kimryn Rathmell","doi":"10.3233/KCA-160004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-160004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report a case of severe type B lactic acidosis (LA) in a 51-year-old male, 12 days after he received his first dose of nivolumab for metastatic Von Hippel Lindau (<i>VHL)</i>-mutated, clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Throughout his hospital course, infection, hypoperfusion, and tissue necrosis were not identified. We propose that his LA may have resulted from either inherent tumor glycolysis or immune activation and enhanced metabolism. The patient's course was complicated by acute renal failure, and his LA rose progressively, eventually necessitating daily hemodialysis (HD). After receiving five consecutive days of HD, the patient started everolimus daily with the intent of reducing glycolytic metabolism. Subsequently, the rate of lactic acid production slowed, and HD was no longer required after two doses of everolimus. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of type B LA following nivolumab administration, and the use of everolimus to treat type B LA in a patient with renal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"83-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-160004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36637957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Manuel Caitano Maia, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Nazli Dizman, JoAnn Hsu, Jeremy Jones, Richard B Lanman, Kimberly C Banks, Sumanta K Pal
Background: In a series of 224 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we have previously reported circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in 79% of patients. Clinical factors associated with detection are unknown. Methods: Data was obtained from patients with radiographically confirmed stage IV RCC who received ctDNA profiling as a part of routine clinical care using a CLIA-certified platform evaluating 73 genes. Detailed clinical annotation was performed, including assessment of International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, previous and current treatments and calculation of tumor burden using scan data most proximal to ctDNA assessment. Tumor burden was equated to the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all measurable lesions. Results: Thirty-four patients were assessed (18 male and 16 female) with a median age of 62 (range, 34-84). Twenty-six patients, 4 patients and 4 patients had clear cell, sarcomatoid and papillary histologies, respectively. IMDC risk was good, intermediate and poor in 14, 19 and 1 patient, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 18 patients (53%) with a median of 2 genomic alterations (GAs) per patient. No associations were found between IMDC risk, histology or treatment type and presence/absence of ctDNA. However, patients with detectable ctDNA had a higher SLD compared to patients with no detectable ctDNA (8.81 vs 4.49 cm; P = 0.04). Furthermore, when evaluated as a continuous variable, number of GAs was correlated with SLD (P = 0.01). Conclusions: With the caveat of a limited sample size, it appears that SLD (a surrogate for tumor burden) is higher in mRCC patients with detectable ctDNA. Confirmation of these findings in larger series is ongoing and may suggest a capability for ctDNA to either complement or supplant radiographic assessment.
背景:在224例晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者中,我们之前报道了79%的患者检测到循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)。与检测相关的临床因素尚不清楚。方法:数据来自影像学证实的IV期RCC患者,这些患者使用clia认证的平台评估73个基因,接受ctDNA分析作为常规临床护理的一部分。进行了详细的临床注释,包括评估国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险评分,既往和当前治疗以及使用最接近ctDNA评估的扫描数据计算肿瘤负担。肿瘤负荷等于所有可测量病变的最长直径(SLD)之和。结果:34例患者被评估(男性18例,女性16例),中位年龄62岁(范围34-84岁)。26例、4例和4例分别有透明细胞、肉瘤样和乳头状组织。IMDC风险为良、中、差分别为14例、19例和1例。在18例(53%)患者中检测到ctDNA,每位患者中位数为2个基因组改变(GAs)。未发现IMDC风险、组织学或治疗类型与ctDNA的存在/缺失之间存在关联。然而,与未检测到ctDNA的患者相比,检测到ctDNA的患者具有更高的SLD (8.81 vs 4.49 cm;p = 0.04)。此外,当作为一个连续变量评估时,GAs数量与SLD相关(P = 0.01)。结论:由于样本量有限,在检测到ctDNA的mRCC患者中,SLD(肿瘤负荷的替代指标)似乎更高。在更大的系列中对这些发现的证实正在进行中,可能表明ctDNA有能力补充或替代放射学评估。
{"title":"Association of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detection in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) with Tumor Burden.","authors":"Manuel Caitano Maia, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Nazli Dizman, JoAnn Hsu, Jeremy Jones, Richard B Lanman, Kimberly C Banks, Sumanta K Pal","doi":"10.3233/KCA-170007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-170007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In a series of 224 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we have previously reported circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in 79% of patients. Clinical factors associated with detection are unknown. <b>Methods:</b> Data was obtained from patients with radiographically confirmed stage IV RCC who received ctDNA profiling as a part of routine clinical care using a CLIA-certified platform evaluating 73 genes. Detailed clinical annotation was performed, including assessment of International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, previous and current treatments and calculation of tumor burden using scan data most proximal to ctDNA assessment. Tumor burden was equated to the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all measurable lesions. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four patients were assessed (18 male and 16 female) with a median age of 62 (range, 34-84). Twenty-six patients, 4 patients and 4 patients had clear cell, sarcomatoid and papillary histologies, respectively. IMDC risk was good, intermediate and poor in 14, 19 and 1 patient, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 18 patients (53%) with a median of 2 genomic alterations (GAs) per patient. No associations were found between IMDC risk, histology or treatment type and presence/absence of ctDNA. However, patients with detectable ctDNA had a higher SLD compared to patients with no detectable ctDNA (8.81 vs 4.49 cm; <i>P</i> = 0.04). Furthermore, when evaluated as a continuous variable, number of GAs was correlated with SLD (<i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> With the caveat of a limited sample size, it appears that SLD (a surrogate for tumor burden) is higher in mRCC patients with detectable ctDNA. Confirmation of these findings in larger series is ongoing and may suggest a capability for ctDNA to either complement or supplant radiographic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-170007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36637955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L C Harshman, C G Drake, N B Haas, J Manola, M Puligandla, S Signoretti, D Cella, R T Gupta, R Bhatt, E Van Allen, P Lara, T K Choueiri, A Kapoor, D Y C Heng, B Shuch, M Jewett, D George, D Michaelson, M A Carducci, D McDermott, M Allaf
In 2017, there is no adjuvant systemic therapy proven to increase overall survival in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab improves overall survival in metastatic treatment refractory RCC and is generally tolerable. Mouse solid tumor models have revealed a benefit with a short course of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade compared to adjuvant therapy. Two ongoing phase 2 studies of perioperative nivolumab in RCC patients have shown preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays or complications. The recently opened PROSPER RCC trial (A Phase 3 RandOmized Study Comparing PERioperative Nivolumab vs. Observation in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Nephrectomy; EA8143) will examine if the addition of perioperative nivolumab to radical or partial nephrectomy can improve clinical outcomes in patients with high risk localized and locally advanced RCC. With the goal of increasing cure and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in non-metastatic RCC, we are executing a three-pronged, multidisciplinary approach of presurgical priming with nivolumab followed by resection and adjuvant PD-1 blockade. We plan to enroll 766 patients with clinical stage ≥T2 or node positive M0 RCC of any histology in this global, randomized, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study. The investigational arm will receive two doses of nivolumab 240 mg IV prior to surgery followed by adjuvant nivolumab for 9 months. The control arm will undergo the current standard of care: surgical resection followed by observation. Patients are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and histology. The trial is powered to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in the primary endpoint of RFS from the ASSURE historical control of 55.8% to 70.2% at 5 years (HR = 0.70). The study is also powered to detect a significant overall survival benefit (HR 0.67). Key safety, feasibility, and quality of life endpoints are incorporated. PROSPER RCC exemplifies team science with a host of planned correlative work to investigate the impact of the baseline immune milieu and changes after neoadjuvant priming on clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Transforming the Perioperative Treatment Paradigm in Non-Metastatic RCC-A Possible Path Forward.","authors":"L C Harshman, C G Drake, N B Haas, J Manola, M Puligandla, S Signoretti, D Cella, R T Gupta, R Bhatt, E Van Allen, P Lara, T K Choueiri, A Kapoor, D Y C Heng, B Shuch, M Jewett, D George, D Michaelson, M A Carducci, D McDermott, M Allaf","doi":"10.3233/KCA-170010","DOIUrl":"10.3233/KCA-170010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2017, there is no adjuvant systemic therapy proven to increase overall survival in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab improves overall survival in metastatic treatment refractory RCC and is generally tolerable. Mouse solid tumor models have revealed a benefit with a short course of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade compared to adjuvant therapy. Two ongoing phase 2 studies of perioperative nivolumab in RCC patients have shown preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays or complications. The recently opened PROSPER RCC trial (A Phase 3 RandOmized Study Comparing PERioperative Nivolumab vs. Observation in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Nephrectomy; EA8143) will examine if the addition of perioperative nivolumab to radical or partial nephrectomy can improve clinical outcomes in patients with high risk localized and locally advanced RCC. With the goal of increasing cure and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in non-metastatic RCC, we are executing a three-pronged, multidisciplinary approach of presurgical priming with nivolumab followed by resection and adjuvant PD-1 blockade. We plan to enroll 766 patients with clinical stage ≥T2 or node positive M0 RCC of any histology in this global, randomized, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study. The investigational arm will receive two doses of nivolumab 240 mg IV prior to surgery followed by adjuvant nivolumab for 9 months. The control arm will undergo the current standard of care: surgical resection followed by observation. Patients are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and histology. The trial is powered to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in the primary endpoint of RFS from the ASSURE historical control of 55.8% to 70.2% at 5 years (HR = 0.70). The study is also powered to detect a significant overall survival benefit (HR 0.67). Key safety, feasibility, and quality of life endpoints are incorporated. PROSPER RCC exemplifies team science with a host of planned correlative work to investigate the impact of the baseline immune milieu and changes after neoadjuvant priming on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"31-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/fe/kca-1-kca170010.PMC6179104.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36594319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kidney cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignancy, whether viewed across populations, within the same individual, or even within the same tumor. This marked heterogeneity in the biological and clinical behavior of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has confounded many diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Indeed, it is a biologically fascinating tumor, characterized by an array of different histologic phenotypes each with unique molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes. Although an increasing number of tumors (mainly small renal masses) are diagnosed using minimally invasive interventions, many patients still face life-altering surgical and medical interventions, with some having to confront the hazards of incurable metastatic disease. Despite the challenges of this relatively uncommon malignancy – which does not even command top billing as one of the top five causes of cancerrelated death globally – there have been remarkable advances in the understanding of its biologic underpinnings and in the way it is diagnosed and managed throughout the disease continuum. Just in the last two decades, kidney cancer has served as a paradigm for multidisciplinary care, rapid drug development, and evidence-based medicine. For instance, in no other malignant solid tumor has there been so many new systemic agents commercially licensed in the past ten years. It is in this unique context that we launch Kidney Cancer, a new biomedical journal published by IOS Press. Kidney Cancer is focused on novel or emerging high-impact advances in kidney cancer research and management. This journal’s broad aim is “to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the kidney.” One critical goal is to provide a rigorously peer-reviewed venue for the presentation and discussion of research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-theeditor, among others. In addition the journal will feature a number of special features such as timely social media coverage of kidney cancer related news and events, and “clinical trials corner”, which will provide a synopsis of new and interesting developments in that arena. To this end, we have organized an exceptional line-up of editorial board members, consisting of the world leaders in the field of kidney cancer research and treatment. Our team is fully committed to ensuring that this journal only publishes high quality and impactful research that spans the spectrum from bench to bedside to public policy, and everything in between. We anticipate that Kidney Cancer will become an invaluable and indispensable platform for the many collaborative, transdisciplinary, and translational efforts to help treat and finally cure this malignancy.
{"title":"Kidney Cancer: A New Forum for Impactful Scientific Interactions.","authors":"Primo N Lara, Peter F A Mulders","doi":"10.3233/KCA-179001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-179001","url":null,"abstract":"Kidney cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignancy, whether viewed across populations, within the same individual, or even within the same tumor. This marked heterogeneity in the biological and clinical behavior of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has confounded many diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Indeed, it is a biologically fascinating tumor, characterized by an array of different histologic phenotypes each with unique molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes. Although an increasing number of tumors (mainly small renal masses) are diagnosed using minimally invasive interventions, many patients still face life-altering surgical and medical interventions, with some having to confront the hazards of incurable metastatic disease. Despite the challenges of this relatively uncommon malignancy – which does not even command top billing as one of the top five causes of cancerrelated death globally – there have been remarkable advances in the understanding of its biologic underpinnings and in the way it is diagnosed and managed throughout the disease continuum. Just in the last two decades, kidney cancer has served as a paradigm for multidisciplinary care, rapid drug development, and evidence-based medicine. For instance, in no other malignant solid tumor has there been so many new systemic agents commercially licensed in the past ten years. It is in this unique context that we launch Kidney Cancer, a new biomedical journal published by IOS Press. Kidney Cancer is focused on novel or emerging high-impact advances in kidney cancer research and management. This journal’s broad aim is “to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the kidney.” One critical goal is to provide a rigorously peer-reviewed venue for the presentation and discussion of research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-theeditor, among others. In addition the journal will feature a number of special features such as timely social media coverage of kidney cancer related news and events, and “clinical trials corner”, which will provide a synopsis of new and interesting developments in that arena. To this end, we have organized an exceptional line-up of editorial board members, consisting of the world leaders in the field of kidney cancer research and treatment. Our team is fully committed to ensuring that this journal only publishes high quality and impactful research that spans the spectrum from bench to bedside to public policy, and everything in between. We anticipate that Kidney Cancer will become an invaluable and indispensable platform for the many collaborative, transdisciplinary, and translational efforts to help treat and finally cure this malignancy.","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-179001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36594316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M I Carlo, B Manley, S Patil, K M Woo, D T Coskey, A Redzematovic, M Arcila, M Ladanyi, W Lee, Y B Chen, C H Lee, D R Feldman, A A Hakimi, R J Motzer, J J Hsieh, M H Voss
Background: Mutations in VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, and KDM5C are common in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and presence of certain mutations has been associated with outcomes in patients with non-metastatic disease. Limited information is available regarding the correlation between genomic alterations and outcomes in patients with metastatic disease, including response to VEGF-targeted therapy. Objective: To explore correlations between mutational profiles and cancer-specific outcomes, including response to standard VEGF-targeted agents, in patients with metastatic cc RCC. Methods: A retrospective review of 105 patients with metastatic ccRCC who had received systemic therapy and had targeted next-generation sequencing of tumors was conducted. Genomic alterations were correlated to outcomes, including overall survival and time to treatment failure to VEGF-targeted therapy. Results: The most frequent mutations were detected in VHL (83%), PBRM1 (51%), SETD2 (35%), BAP1 (24%), KDM5C (16%), and TERT (14%). Time to treatment failure with VEGF-targeted therapy differed significantly by PBRM1 mutation status (p = 0.01, median 12.0 months for MT versus 6.9 months for WT) and BAP1 mutation status (p = 0.01, median 6.4 months for MT versus 11.0 months for WT). Shorter overall survival was associated with TERT mutations (p = 0.03, median 29.6 months for MT versus 52.6 months for WT) or BAP1 mutations (p = 0.02, median 28.7 months for MT versus not reached for WT). Conclusions: Genomic alterations in ccRCC tumors have prognostic implications in patients with metastatic disease. BAP1 and TERT promoter mutations may be present in higher frequency than previously thought, and based on this data, deserve further study for their association with poor prognosis.
{"title":"Genomic Alterations and Outcomes with VEGF-Targeted Therapy in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"M I Carlo, B Manley, S Patil, K M Woo, D T Coskey, A Redzematovic, M Arcila, M Ladanyi, W Lee, Y B Chen, C H Lee, D R Feldman, A A Hakimi, R J Motzer, J J Hsieh, M H Voss","doi":"10.3233/KCA-160003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-160003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mutations in <i>VHL</i>, <i>PBRM1</i>, <i>SETD2</i>, <i>BAP1</i>, and <i>KDM5C</i> are common in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and presence of certain mutations has been associated with outcomes in patients with non-metastatic disease. Limited information is available regarding the correlation between genomic alterations and outcomes in patients with metastatic disease, including response to VEGF-targeted therapy. <b>Objective:</b> To explore correlations between mutational profiles and cancer-specific outcomes, including response to standard VEGF-targeted agents, in patients with metastatic cc RCC. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review of 105 patients with metastatic ccRCC who had received systemic therapy and had targeted next-generation sequencing of tumors was conducted. Genomic alterations were correlated to outcomes, including overall survival and time to treatment failure to VEGF-targeted therapy. <b>Results:</b> The most frequent mutations were detected in <i>VHL</i> (83%), <i>PBRM1</i> (51%), <i>SETD2</i> (35%), <i>BAP1</i> (24%), <i>KDM5C</i> (16%), and <i>TERT</i> (14%). Time to treatment failure with VEGF-targeted therapy differed significantly by <i>PBRM1</i> mutation status (<i>p</i> = 0.01, median 12.0 months for MT versus 6.9 months for WT) and <i>BAP1</i> mutation status (<i>p</i> = 0.01, median 6.4 months for MT versus 11.0 months for WT). Shorter overall survival was associated with <i>TERT</i> mutations (<i>p</i> = 0.03, median 29.6 months for MT versus 52.6 months for WT) or <i>BAP1</i> mutations (<i>p</i> = 0.02, median 28.7 months for MT versus not reached for WT). <b>Conclusions:</b> Genomic alterations in ccRCC tumors have prognostic implications in patients with metastatic disease. <i>BAP1</i> and <i>TERT</i> promoter mutations may be present in higher frequency than previously thought, and based on this data, deserve further study for their association with poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-160003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36594320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Manuel Caitano Maia, Nazli Dizman, Meghan Salgia, Sumanta Kumar Pal
The influx of multiple novel therapeutic options in the mRCC field has brought a challenge for treatment sequencing in this disease. In the past few years, cabozantinib, nivolumab and the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus have been approved in the second-line setting. As there is no direct comparison between these agents and the studies have failed to show improved benefit among a biomarker-selected patient population, appropriate patient selection based on clinical factors for individualized therapy is critical. Herein we provide a comprehensive overview of current data from each agent through the discussion of disease biology, clinical trials, potential biomarkers and distilling future perspectives in the field.
{"title":"Therapeutic Sequencing in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Manuel Caitano Maia, Nazli Dizman, Meghan Salgia, Sumanta Kumar Pal","doi":"10.3233/KCA-170006","DOIUrl":"10.3233/KCA-170006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influx of multiple novel therapeutic options in the mRCC field has brought a challenge for treatment sequencing in this disease. In the past few years, cabozantinib, nivolumab and the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus have been approved in the second-line setting. As there is no direct comparison between these agents and the studies have failed to show improved benefit among a biomarker-selected patient population, appropriate patient selection based on clinical factors for individualized therapy is critical. Herein we provide a comprehensive overview of current data from each agent through the discussion of disease biology, clinical trials, potential biomarkers and distilling future perspectives in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"15-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-170006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36594318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cyllene R Morris, Primo N Lara, Arti Parikh-Patel, Kenneth W Kizer
Background and Objective: Since the 1990s, multiple studies have reported on an increased incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCC), which has been considered incidental to the high use of abdominal diagnostic imaging. This population-based study used data from the California Cancer Registry to (i) update trends in RCC incidence and mortality by several tumor and demographic characteristics after reports of decreased use of diagnostic imaging in recent years, and (ii) examine changes in surgical treatment for early-stage RCC. Methods: Records of patients diagnosed with RCC from 1988 through 2013 and mortality data from the same period were examined. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate annual percent changes in age-adjusted RCC incidence and mortality rates, stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, grade, and tumor size. Trends in the proportion of partial or total/radical nephrectomies were evaluated by Cochran-Armitage tests. Results: A total of 77,363 incident cases of RCC and 28,590 deaths were evaluated. While mortality rates significantly decreased, the incidence of small localized RCC increased in virtually all groups examined after the mid-1990s until 2008-2009, when incidence trends stabilized in all groups concomitant with a decrease in imaging. The proportion of partial nephrectomies among patients with small localized tumors increased from 13.8% in 1988 to 74.6% in 2013. Conclusions: Earlier trends in RCC were consistent with the incidental discovery of small tumors. In parallel with the increase in early-stage RCC, the use of partial nephrectomies increased markedly. Following the decreased use of advanced diagnostic imaging, the trend of increasing RCC incidence appears to have ended in California.
{"title":"Kidney Cancer Incidence in California: End of the Trend?","authors":"Cyllene R Morris, Primo N Lara, Arti Parikh-Patel, Kenneth W Kizer","doi":"10.3233/KCA-170005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-170005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objective:</b> Since the 1990s, multiple studies have reported on an increased incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCC), which has been considered incidental to the high use of abdominal diagnostic imaging. This population-based study used data from the California Cancer Registry to (i) update trends in RCC incidence and mortality by several tumor and demographic characteristics after reports of decreased use of diagnostic imaging in recent years, and (ii) examine changes in surgical treatment for early-stage RCC. <b>Methods:</b> Records of patients diagnosed with RCC from 1988 through 2013 and mortality data from the same period were examined. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate annual percent changes in age-adjusted RCC incidence and mortality rates, stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, grade, and tumor size. Trends in the proportion of partial or total/radical nephrectomies were evaluated by Cochran-Armitage tests. <b>Results:</b> A total of 77,363 incident cases of RCC and 28,590 deaths were evaluated. While mortality rates significantly decreased, the incidence of small localized RCC increased in virtually all groups examined after the mid-1990s until 2008-2009, when incidence trends stabilized in all groups concomitant with a decrease in imaging. The proportion of partial nephrectomies among patients with small localized tumors increased from 13.8% in 1988 to 74.6% in 2013. <b>Conclusions:</b> Earlier trends in RCC were consistent with the incidental discovery of small tumors. In parallel with the increase in early-stage RCC, the use of partial nephrectomies increased markedly. Following the decreased use of advanced diagnostic imaging, the trend of increasing RCC incidence appears to have ended in California.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"71-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-170005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36637956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jozefina Casuscelli, Yann-Alexandre Vano, Wolf Herve Fridman, James J Hsieh
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) encompasses a wide spectrum of morphologically and molecularly distinct (>10) cancer subtypes originated from the kidney epithelium. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) is lethal and refractory to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. The incorporation of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors into the current practice of mRCC has markedly improved the median overall survival of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) patients, the most common subtype, but not rare kidney cancer (RKC or non-ccRCC, nccRCC). Varied treatment response in mRCC patients is observed, which presents clinical challenges/opportunities at the modern mRCC therapeutic landscape consisting of 12 approved drugs representing 6 different effective mechanisms. Key contributing factors include inter- and intra-RCC heterogeneity. With the advances in pan-omics technologies, we now have a better understanding of the molecular pathobiology of individual RCC subtype. Here, we attempt to classify ccRCC based on contemporary molecular features with emphasis on their respective potential significance in clinical practice.
{"title":"Molecular Classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Its Implication in Future Clinical Practice.","authors":"Jozefina Casuscelli, Yann-Alexandre Vano, Wolf Herve Fridman, James J Hsieh","doi":"10.3233/KCA-170008","DOIUrl":"10.3233/KCA-170008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) encompasses a wide spectrum of morphologically and molecularly distinct (>10) cancer subtypes originated from the kidney epithelium. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) is lethal and refractory to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. The incorporation of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors into the current practice of mRCC has markedly improved the median overall survival of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) patients, the most common subtype, but not rare kidney cancer (RKC or non-ccRCC, nccRCC). Varied treatment response in mRCC patients is observed, which presents clinical challenges/opportunities at the modern mRCC therapeutic landscape consisting of 12 approved drugs representing 6 different effective mechanisms. Key contributing factors include inter- and intra-RCC heterogeneity. With the advances in pan-omics technologies, we now have a better understanding of the molecular pathobiology of individual RCC subtype. Here, we attempt to classify ccRCC based on contemporary molecular features with emphasis on their respective potential significance in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-170008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36594317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven M Yip, Jose M Ruiz Morales, Frede Donskov, Anna Fraccon, Umberto Basso, Brian I Rini, Jae Lyun Lee, Georg A Bjarnason, Hao-Wen Sim, Benoit Beuselinck, Ravindran Kanesvaran, James Brugarolas, Kostas Koutsoukos, Simon Yuen Fai Fu, Takeshi Yuasa, Ian Davis, Ajjai Alva, Christian Kollmannsberger, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng
Background: Treatment outcomes are poorly characterized in patients with metastatic chromophobe renal cell cancer (chrRCC), a subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Objective: This retrospective series aims to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the IMDC dataset of 4970 patients to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. Results: 109/4970 (2.2%) patients had metastatic chrRCC out of all patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy. These patients were compared with 4861/4970 (97.8%) clear cell mRCC (ccRCC) patients. Patients with metastatic chrRCC had a similar OS compared to patients with ccRCC (23.8 months (95% CI 16.7 - 28.1) vs 22.4 months (95% CI 21.4 - 23.4), respectively (p = 0.0908). Patients with IMDC favorable (18%), intermediate (59%) and poor risk (23%) had median overall survivals of 31.4, 27.3, and 4.8 months, respectively (p = 0.028). Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series of metastatic chrRCC patients and these results set new benchmarks for survival in clinical trial design and patient counseling. The IMDC criteria risk categories seem to stratify patients into appropriate favourable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, although larger patient numbers are required. It appears that outcomes between metastatic chrRCC and ccRCC are similar when treated with conventional targeted therapies. Patients with metastatic chrRCC can be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and enrolled in clinical trials to further measure outcomes in this rare patient population.
背景:转移性憎色性肾细胞癌(chrRCC)是肾细胞癌的一种亚型,其治疗结果特征不佳。目的:本回顾性研究旨在确定靶向治疗时代转移性chrRCC的治疗结果。方法:使用IMDC数据集对4970例患者进行回顾性数据分析,以确定靶向治疗时代转移性chrRCC的治疗结果。结果:在所有接受靶向治疗的mRCC患者中,109/4970(2.2%)患者为转移性chrRCC。这些患者与4861/4970例(97.8%)透明细胞mRCC (ccRCC)患者进行比较。与ccRCC患者相比,转移性chrRCC患者的OS相似(分别为23.8个月(95% CI 16.7 - 28.1)和22.4个月(95% CI 21.4 - 23.4) (p = 0.0908)。IMDC有利(18%)、中等(59%)和低风险(23%)患者的中位总生存期分别为31.4个月、27.3个月和4.8个月(p = 0.028)。结论:据作者所知,这是最大的转移性chrRCC患者系列,这些结果为临床试验设计和患者咨询的生存设定了新的基准。尽管需要更多的患者,但IMDC标准的风险类别似乎将患者分为适当的有利、中等和低风险组。在接受常规靶向治疗时,转移性chrRCC和ccRCC的预后似乎相似。转移性chrRCC患者可以用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗,并参加临床试验以进一步测量这一罕见患者群体的预后。
{"title":"Outcomes of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma (chrRCC) in the Targeted Therapy Era: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC).","authors":"Steven M Yip, Jose M Ruiz Morales, Frede Donskov, Anna Fraccon, Umberto Basso, Brian I Rini, Jae Lyun Lee, Georg A Bjarnason, Hao-Wen Sim, Benoit Beuselinck, Ravindran Kanesvaran, James Brugarolas, Kostas Koutsoukos, Simon Yuen Fai Fu, Takeshi Yuasa, Ian Davis, Ajjai Alva, Christian Kollmannsberger, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng","doi":"10.3233/KCA-160002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-160002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Treatment outcomes are poorly characterized in patients with metastatic chromophobe renal cell cancer (chrRCC), a subtype of renal cell carcinoma. <b>Objective:</b> This retrospective series aims to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective data analysis was performed using the IMDC dataset of 4970 patients to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. <b>Results:</b> 109/4970 (2.2%) patients had metastatic chrRCC out of all patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy. These patients were compared with 4861/4970 (97.8%) clear cell mRCC (ccRCC) patients. Patients with metastatic chrRCC had a similar OS compared to patients with ccRCC (23.8 months (95% CI 16.7 - 28.1) vs 22.4 months (95% CI 21.4 - 23.4), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0908). Patients with IMDC favorable (18%), intermediate (59%) and poor risk (23%) had median overall survivals of 31.4, 27.3, and 4.8 months, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.028). <b>Conclusions:</b> To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series of metastatic chrRCC patients and these results set new benchmarks for survival in clinical trial design and patient counseling. The IMDC criteria risk categories seem to stratify patients into appropriate favourable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, although larger patient numbers are required. It appears that outcomes between metastatic chrRCC and ccRCC are similar when treated with conventional targeted therapies. Patients with metastatic chrRCC can be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and enrolled in clinical trials to further measure outcomes in this rare patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-160002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36594321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}