首页 > 最新文献

Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)最新文献

英文 中文
Fetal Growth Restriction: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Management 胎儿生长限制:机制、流行病学和管理
Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000161
H. D. Kamphof, Selina Posthuma, S. Gordijn, W. Ganzevoort
Abstract Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is the condition in which a fetus does not reach its intrinsic growth potential and in which the short-term and long-term risks of severe complications are increased. FGR is a frequent complication of pregnancy with a complex etiology and limited management options, other than timely delivery. The most common pathophysiological mechanism is placental insufficiency, due to many underlying causes such as maternal vascular malperfusion, fetal vascular malperfusion and villitis. Identifying truly growth restricted fetuses remains challenging. To date, FGR is often defined by a cut-off of the estimated fetal weight below a certain percentile on a population-based standard. However, small fetal size as a single marker does not discriminate adequately between fetuses or newborns that are constitutionally small but healthy and fetuses or newborns that are growth restricted and thus at risk for adverse outcomes. In 2016, the consensus definition of FGR was internationally accepted to better pinpoint the FGR population. In this review we will discuss the contemporary diagnosis and management issues. Different diagnostic markers are considered, like Doppler measurements, estimated fetal growth, interval growth, fetal movements, biomarkers, and placental markers.
摘要胎儿生长受限(FGR)是指胎儿未达到其固有生长潜力,严重并发症的短期和长期风险增加的情况。FGR是妊娠的常见并发症,病因复杂,除及时分娩外,治疗选择有限。最常见的病理生理机制是胎盘功能不全,这是由于许多潜在的原因,如母体血管灌注不良、胎儿血管灌注不良和绒毛炎。识别真正生长受限的胎儿仍然具有挑战性。到目前为止,FGR通常是由基于人群的标准中估计胎儿体重低于某个百分位数的临界值来定义的。然而,作为单一标志物的小胎儿尺寸并不能充分区分体质小但健康的胎儿或新生儿与生长受限并因此有不良后果风险的胎儿或婴儿。2016年,国际上普遍接受了女性生殖器切割的定义,以更好地确定女性生殖器切割人群。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论当代的诊断和管理问题。考虑了不同的诊断标志物,如多普勒测量、估计的胎儿生长、间隔生长、胎动、生物标志物和胎盘标志物。
{"title":"Fetal Growth Restriction: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Management","authors":"H. D. Kamphof, Selina Posthuma, S. Gordijn, W. Ganzevoort","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000161","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is the condition in which a fetus does not reach its intrinsic growth potential and in which the short-term and long-term risks of severe complications are increased. FGR is a frequent complication of pregnancy with a complex etiology and limited management options, other than timely delivery. The most common pathophysiological mechanism is placental insufficiency, due to many underlying causes such as maternal vascular malperfusion, fetal vascular malperfusion and villitis. Identifying truly growth restricted fetuses remains challenging. To date, FGR is often defined by a cut-off of the estimated fetal weight below a certain percentile on a population-based standard. However, small fetal size as a single marker does not discriminate adequately between fetuses or newborns that are constitutionally small but healthy and fetuses or newborns that are growth restricted and thus at risk for adverse outcomes. In 2016, the consensus definition of FGR was internationally accepted to better pinpoint the FGR population. In this review we will discuss the contemporary diagnosis and management issues. Different diagnostic markers are considered, like Doppler measurements, estimated fetal growth, interval growth, fetal movements, biomarkers, and placental markers.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48402918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A Summary of Chinese Expert Consensus on Fetal Growth Restriction (An Update on the 2019 Version) 中国胎儿生长限制专家共识综述(2019年版更新)
Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000158
Luming Sun, Yali Hu, H. Qi
Abstract Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a common complication of pregnancy associated with higher rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity, as well as a variety of long-term adverse outcomes. To standardize the clinical practice for the management of FGR in China, Fetal Medicine Subgroup, Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Chinese Medical Association and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Chinese Medical Association organized an expert committee to provide official consensus-based recommendations on FGR. We evaluated the evidence provided by relevant high-quality literature, performed a three-round Delphi study and organized face-to-face meetings with experts from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The consensus includes the definition, prenatal screening, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring and management of FGR.
胎儿生长受限(FGR)是一种常见的妊娠并发症,与较高的围产期死亡率和发病率以及各种长期不良后果相关。为规范我国FGR的临床管理,中华医学会胎儿医学分会、中华医学会围产期医学会母胎医学专业委员会、中华医学会妇产科学分会组织了FGR专家委员会,提出了基于共识的FGR官方建议。我们评估了相关高质量文献提供的证据,进行了三轮德尔菲研究,并与多学科背景的专家组织了面对面的会议。共识包括FGR的定义、产前筛查、预防、诊断、监测和管理。
{"title":"A Summary of Chinese Expert Consensus on Fetal Growth Restriction (An Update on the 2019 Version)","authors":"Luming Sun, Yali Hu, H. Qi","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000158","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a common complication of pregnancy associated with higher rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity, as well as a variety of long-term adverse outcomes. To standardize the clinical practice for the management of FGR in China, Fetal Medicine Subgroup, Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Chinese Medical Association and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Chinese Medical Association organized an expert committee to provide official consensus-based recommendations on FGR. We evaluated the evidence provided by relevant high-quality literature, performed a three-round Delphi study and organized face-to-face meetings with experts from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The consensus includes the definition, prenatal screening, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring and management of FGR.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43108865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Evidence-Based Screening, Diagnosis and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction: Challenges and Confusions 胎儿生长受限的循证筛查、诊断和管理:挑战和困惑
Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/fm9.0000000000000162
Luming Sun, D. Oepkes
{"title":"Evidence-Based Screening, Diagnosis and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction: Challenges and Confusions","authors":"Luming Sun, D. Oepkes","doi":"10.1097/fm9.0000000000000162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000162","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44232108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Temporal Trends of Maternal Mortality Due to Obstetric Hemorrhage in Chinese Mainland: Evidence from the Population-Based Surveillance Data Between 2000 and 2019 中国大陆产科出血孕产妇死亡率的时间趋势:来自2000年至2019年人口监测数据的证据
Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000152
Yi Mu, Jun Zhu, Yan-ping Wang, Jiani Zhang, Ming-rong Li, Peiran Chen, Yanxia Xie, Juan Liang, Xiaodong Wang
Abstract Objective: To analyze the temporal trends of maternal mortality ratio (MMR) due to obstetric hemorrhage and its specific causes in Chinese mainland from 2000 to 2019, to identify whether the rate of change has accelerated or slowed down during this period, and to find the prior cause of obstetric hemorrhage that needs to be intervened in the future. Methods: Individual information on maternal deaths and total number of live births from 336 surveillance sites across 31 provinces in Chinese mainland was collected from the National Maternal and Child Health Surveillance System between 2000 and 2019. Maternal death was defined according to the World Health Organization's criterion. The final underlying cause of death was confirmed by the national review and was coded according to International Classification of Diseases -10. Linear trends for changes in characteristics of maternal deaths were assessed using linear or logistic models with the year treated as a continuous variable. The MMR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for regions or causes were estimated by Poisson's distribution. Joinpoint regression was used to assess the accurate temporal patterns. Results: The national MMR due to obstetric hemorrhage was 18.4 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 15.0–22.2) in 2000. It peaked in 2001 (22.1 per 100,000 live births, 95% CI: 18.3–26.4) and was lowest in 2019 (1.6 per 100,000 live births, 95% CI: 1.0–2.3). For specific regions, the MMR due to obstetric hemorrhage in rural areas and western regions both experienced a slight rise, followed by a rapid decline, and then a slow decline. For specific causes, no change point was found in joinpoint analysis of the national MMR caused by placenta previa, postpartum uterine atony, and retained placenta (the annual percent change was −12.0%, −10.5%, and −21.0%, respectively). The MMR caused by postpartum hemorrhages (PPH) significantly declined by 8.0% (95% CI: 1.9–13.6) per year from 2000 to 2007. The annual percent change of MMR caused by PPH accelerated further to −25.0% between 2007 and 2011, and then decreased to −7.8% between 2011 and 2019. The proportion of maternal deaths due to antepartum hemorrhages increased from 7.6% (8/105) in 2000 to 14.3% (4/28) in 2019. The changes in the proportion of causes were different for maternal deaths due to PPH. The proportion of postpartum uterine atony increased from 39.0% (41/105) in 2000 to 60.7% (17/28) in 2019, and the proportion of uterine rupture also increased from 12.3% (13/105) in 2000 to 14.3% (4/28) in 2019. However, the proportion of retained placenta decreased from 37.1% (39/105) in 2000 to 7.1% (2/28) in 2019. Conclusion: Over the last 20  years, the intervention practice in China has proved that targeted interventions are beneficial in reducing the MMR due to obstetric hemorrhage. However, the MMR has reached a plateau and is likely to increase for some specific causes such as uterine rupture. China needs to develop more effective interventions
摘要目的:分析2000-2009年中国大陆产科出血孕产妇死亡率的时间趋势及其具体原因,以确定这一时期的变化速度是加快还是减缓,并找出未来需要干预的产科出血的既往原因。方法:2000年至2019年,从国家妇幼保健监测系统收集中国大陆31个省份336个监测点的孕产妇死亡和活产总数的个人信息。孕产妇死亡是根据世界卫生组织的标准定义的。国家审查确认了最终的根本死因,并根据国际疾病分类-10进行了编码。使用线性或逻辑模型评估产妇死亡特征变化的线性趋势,将年份作为连续变量。区域或原因的MMR和95%置信区间(CI)由泊松分布估计。联合点回归用于评估准确的时间模式。结果:2000年,全国产科出血引起的MMR为18.4/10万活产(95%CI:15.0-22.2)。它在2001年达到峰值(22.1/10万活产,95%CI:18.3-26.4),在2019年最低(1.6/10万活生,95%CI:1.0-2.3)。就特定地区而言,农村和西部地区因产科出血引起的MMR都略有上升,随后迅速下降,然后缓慢下降。对于具体原因,在前置胎盘、产后子宫收缩乏力和胎盘滞留引起的全国MMR的联合点分析中没有发现变化点(年变化百分比分别为−12.0%、−10.5%和−21.0%)。从2000年到2007年,产后出血(PPH)引起的MMR每年显著下降8.0%(95%CI:1.9-13.6)。PPH引起的MMR年百分比变化在2007年至2011年间进一步加速至−25.0%,然后在2011年至2019年间降至−7.8%。产妇因产前出血死亡的比例从2000年的7.6%(8/105)增加到2019年的14.3%(4/28)。PPH导致产妇死亡的原因比例变化不同。产后子宫收缩乏力的比例从2000年的39.0%(41/105)增加到2019年的60.7%(17/28),子宫破裂的比例也从2000年(13/105)的12.3%增加到了2019年的14.3%(4/28)。然而,胎盘残留的比例从2000年的37.1%(39/105)下降到2019年的7.1%(2/28)。结论:过去20年  多年来,中国的干预实践证明,有针对性的干预措施有利于降低产科出血引起的MMR。然而,MMR已经达到了一个平稳期,并且可能因某些特定原因(如子宫破裂)而增加。中国需要制定更有效的干预措施,以减少产妇因产科出血而死亡,尤其是产后子宫收缩乏力和子宫破裂。
{"title":"Temporal Trends of Maternal Mortality Due to Obstetric Hemorrhage in Chinese Mainland: Evidence from the Population-Based Surveillance Data Between 2000 and 2019","authors":"Yi Mu, Jun Zhu, Yan-ping Wang, Jiani Zhang, Ming-rong Li, Peiran Chen, Yanxia Xie, Juan Liang, Xiaodong Wang","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000152","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To analyze the temporal trends of maternal mortality ratio (MMR) due to obstetric hemorrhage and its specific causes in Chinese mainland from 2000 to 2019, to identify whether the rate of change has accelerated or slowed down during this period, and to find the prior cause of obstetric hemorrhage that needs to be intervened in the future. Methods: Individual information on maternal deaths and total number of live births from 336 surveillance sites across 31 provinces in Chinese mainland was collected from the National Maternal and Child Health Surveillance System between 2000 and 2019. Maternal death was defined according to the World Health Organization's criterion. The final underlying cause of death was confirmed by the national review and was coded according to International Classification of Diseases -10. Linear trends for changes in characteristics of maternal deaths were assessed using linear or logistic models with the year treated as a continuous variable. The MMR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for regions or causes were estimated by Poisson's distribution. Joinpoint regression was used to assess the accurate temporal patterns. Results: The national MMR due to obstetric hemorrhage was 18.4 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 15.0–22.2) in 2000. It peaked in 2001 (22.1 per 100,000 live births, 95% CI: 18.3–26.4) and was lowest in 2019 (1.6 per 100,000 live births, 95% CI: 1.0–2.3). For specific regions, the MMR due to obstetric hemorrhage in rural areas and western regions both experienced a slight rise, followed by a rapid decline, and then a slow decline. For specific causes, no change point was found in joinpoint analysis of the national MMR caused by placenta previa, postpartum uterine atony, and retained placenta (the annual percent change was −12.0%, −10.5%, and −21.0%, respectively). The MMR caused by postpartum hemorrhages (PPH) significantly declined by 8.0% (95% CI: 1.9–13.6) per year from 2000 to 2007. The annual percent change of MMR caused by PPH accelerated further to −25.0% between 2007 and 2011, and then decreased to −7.8% between 2011 and 2019. The proportion of maternal deaths due to antepartum hemorrhages increased from 7.6% (8/105) in 2000 to 14.3% (4/28) in 2019. The changes in the proportion of causes were different for maternal deaths due to PPH. The proportion of postpartum uterine atony increased from 39.0% (41/105) in 2000 to 60.7% (17/28) in 2019, and the proportion of uterine rupture also increased from 12.3% (13/105) in 2000 to 14.3% (4/28) in 2019. However, the proportion of retained placenta decreased from 37.1% (39/105) in 2000 to 7.1% (2/28) in 2019. Conclusion: Over the last 20  years, the intervention practice in China has proved that targeted interventions are beneficial in reducing the MMR due to obstetric hemorrhage. However, the MMR has reached a plateau and is likely to increase for some specific causes such as uterine rupture. China needs to develop more effective interventions ","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47144867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Interobserver Agreement and Reliability of Intrapartum Nonreassuring Cardiotocography and Prediction of Neonatal Acidemia 观察者之间的一致性和可靠性产心不安造影和新生儿酸血症预测
Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000146
Zhu-yu Li, Yan Wang, Jian Cai, Peizhen Zhao, Hanqing Chen, Haiyan Liu, L. Shen, Lian Chen, Shufang Li, Yangyu Zhao, Zilian Wang
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the agreement and reliability of intrapartum nonreasurring cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation and prediction of neonatal acidemia by obstetricians working in different centers. Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving two tertiary hospitals (The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Perking University Third Hospital) was conducted between 30th September 2018 and 1st April 2019. Six obstetricians from two hospitals with three levels of experience (junior, medium, and senior) reviewed 100 nonreassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings from 1 hour before the onset of abnormalities until delivery. Each reviewer determined the FHR pattern, the baseline, variability, and presence of acceleration, deceleration, sinusoidal pattern, and predicted whether neonatal acidemia and abnormal umbilical arterial pH < 7.1 would occur. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using the proportions of agreement (Pa) and the proportion of specific agreement (Pa for each category). Reliability was evaluated with the kappa statistic (k-Light's kappa for n raters) and Gwet's AC1 statistic. Results: Good inter-observer agreement was found in evaluation of most variables (Pa > 0.5), with the exception of early deceleration (Pa = 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36,0.43). Reliability was also good among most variables (AC1 > 0.40), except for acceleration, early deceleration, and prediction of neonatal acidemia (AC1 = 0.17, 0.10, and 0.25, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups, except in the identification of accelerations (Pa = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83,0.95; Pa = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41,0.60, and Pa = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25,0.43 in junior, medium and senior groups, respectively) and the prediction of neonatal acidemia (Pa = 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 in junior, medium and senior groups, respectively), where agreement was highest and lowest in the junior-level group, respectively. The accuracy and sensitivity of the prediction for umbilical artery pH < 7.1 were similar among the three groups, but the specificity was higher in the senior groups (93.68% vs. 92.53% vs. 98.85% in junior, medium and senior groups, P = 0.015). Conclusion: Although we found a good inter-observer agreement in the evaluation of the most basic CTG features and FHR category statistically, it was insufficient to meet the clinical requirements for “no objection” interpretation for FHR tracings. Further specialized training is needed for standardized interpretation of intrapartum FHR tracings.
摘要目的:评估不同中心产科医生对新生儿酸血症的产时非测量性心脏分娩图(CTG)解释和预测的一致性和可靠性。方法:在2018年9月30日至2019年4月1日期间,对两家三级医院(中山大学附属第一医院和珀金大学第三医院)进行了回顾性队列研究。来自两家医院的六名产科医生具有三个级别的经验(初级、中级和高级),他们审查了从异常发生前1小时到分娩的100次不可靠的胎儿心率(FHR)追踪。每位评审员确定FHR模式、基线、变异性以及加速、减速、正弦曲线模式的存在,并预测新生儿是否出现酸血症和脐动脉pH异常  0.5),除了早期减速(Pa = 0.39,95%置信区间(CI):0.36,0.43)。大多数变量的可靠性也很好(AC1 > 0.40),除了加速、早期减速和预测新生儿酸血症(AC1 = 分别为0.17、0.10和0.25)。除了加速度的识别(Pa = 0.89,95%置信区间:0.83,0.95;帕 = 0.50,95%置信区间:0.41,0.60,Pa = 0.35,95%CI:0.25,0.43)和新生儿酸血症的预测(Pa = 初级组、中级组和高级组分别为0.52、0.52和0.62),其中初级组的一致性分别最高和最低。脐动脉pH值预测的准确性和敏感性 < 7.1在三组中相似,但在老年组中的特异性更高(93.68%对92.53%对98.85%在初级、中级和高级组中,P = 0.015)。结论:尽管我们在统计学上发现观察者之间在评估最基本的CTG特征和FHR类别方面存在良好的一致性,但这不足以满足FHR追踪“无异议”解释的临床要求。需要进一步的专业培训来对产时FHR描记进行标准化解释。
{"title":"Interobserver Agreement and Reliability of Intrapartum Nonreassuring Cardiotocography and Prediction of Neonatal Acidemia","authors":"Zhu-yu Li, Yan Wang, Jian Cai, Peizhen Zhao, Hanqing Chen, Haiyan Liu, L. Shen, Lian Chen, Shufang Li, Yangyu Zhao, Zilian Wang","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000146","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To evaluate the agreement and reliability of intrapartum nonreasurring cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation and prediction of neonatal acidemia by obstetricians working in different centers. Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving two tertiary hospitals (The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Perking University Third Hospital) was conducted between 30th September 2018 and 1st April 2019. Six obstetricians from two hospitals with three levels of experience (junior, medium, and senior) reviewed 100 nonreassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings from 1 hour before the onset of abnormalities until delivery. Each reviewer determined the FHR pattern, the baseline, variability, and presence of acceleration, deceleration, sinusoidal pattern, and predicted whether neonatal acidemia and abnormal umbilical arterial pH < 7.1 would occur. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using the proportions of agreement (Pa) and the proportion of specific agreement (Pa for each category). Reliability was evaluated with the kappa statistic (k-Light's kappa for n raters) and Gwet's AC1 statistic. Results: Good inter-observer agreement was found in evaluation of most variables (Pa > 0.5), with the exception of early deceleration (Pa = 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36,0.43). Reliability was also good among most variables (AC1 > 0.40), except for acceleration, early deceleration, and prediction of neonatal acidemia (AC1 = 0.17, 0.10, and 0.25, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups, except in the identification of accelerations (Pa = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83,0.95; Pa = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41,0.60, and Pa = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25,0.43 in junior, medium and senior groups, respectively) and the prediction of neonatal acidemia (Pa = 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 in junior, medium and senior groups, respectively), where agreement was highest and lowest in the junior-level group, respectively. The accuracy and sensitivity of the prediction for umbilical artery pH < 7.1 were similar among the three groups, but the specificity was higher in the senior groups (93.68% vs. 92.53% vs. 98.85% in junior, medium and senior groups, P = 0.015). Conclusion: Although we found a good inter-observer agreement in the evaluation of the most basic CTG features and FHR category statistically, it was insufficient to meet the clinical requirements for “no objection” interpretation for FHR tracings. Further specialized training is needed for standardized interpretation of intrapartum FHR tracings.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49577161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CTGNet: Automatic Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate from Cardiotocograph Using Artificial Intelligence CTGNet:利用人工智能从心电图自动分析胎儿心率
Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000147
Mei Zhong, Hao Yi, Fan Lai, Mujun Liu, Rongdan Zeng, Xue Kang, Yahui Xiao, J. Rong, Huijin Wang, Jieyun Bai, Yaosheng Lu
Abstract Objective: This study investigates the efficacy of analyzing fetal heart rate (FHR) signals based on Artificial Intelligence to obtain a baseline calculation and identify accelerations/decelerations in the FHR through electronic fetal monitoring during labor. Methods: A total of 43,888 cardiotocograph(CTG) records of female patients in labor from January 2012 to December 2020 were collected from the NanFang Hospital of Southern Medical University. After filtering the data, 2341 FHR records were used for the study. The ObVue fetal monitoring system, manufactured by Lian-Med Technology Co. Ltd., was used to monitor the FHR signals for these pregnant women from the beginning of the first stage of labor to the end of delivery. Two obstetric experts together annotated the FHR signals in the system to determine the baseline as well as accelerations/decelerations of the FHR. Our cardiotocograph network (CTGNet) as well as traditional methods were then used to automatically analyze the baseline and acceleration/deceleration of the FHR signals. The results of calculations were compared with the annotations provided by the obstetric experts, and ten-fold cross-validation was applied to evaluate them. The root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between the baselines, acceleration F-measure (Acc.F-measure), deceleration F-measure (Dec.F-measure), and the morphological analysis discordance index (MADI) were used as evaluation metrics. The data were analyzed by using a paired t-test. Results: The proposed CTGNet was superior to the best traditional method, proposed by Mantel, in terms of the RMSD.BL (1.7935 ± 0.8099 vs. 2.0293 ± 0.9267, t = −3.55 , P = 0.004), Acc.F-measure (86.8562 ± 10.9422 vs. 72.2367 ± 14.2096, t = 12.43, P <0.001), Dec.F-measure (72.1038 ± 33.2592 vs. 58.5040 ± 38.0276, t = 4.10, P <0.001), SI (34.8277±20.9595 vs. 54.8049 ± 25.0265, t = −9.39, P <0.001), and MADI (3.1741 ± 1.9901 vs. 3.7289 ± 2.7253, t = −2.74, P = 0.012). The proposed CTGNet thus had significant advantages over the best traditional method on all evaluation metrics. Conclusion: The proposed Artificial Intelligence-based method CTGNet delivers good performance in terms of the automatic analysis of FHR based on cardiotocograph data. It promises to be a key component of smart obstetrics systems of the future.
摘要目的:本研究探讨基于人工智能的胎儿心率(FHR)信号分析的有效性,通过胎儿电子监护获得基线计算并识别分娩过程中FHR的加速/减速。方法:收集2012年1月~ 2020年12月南方医科大学南方医院分娩女性患者的CTG记录43888份。筛选数据后,使用2341例FHR记录进行研究。使用联医科技有限公司生产的ObVue胎儿监测系统,对这些孕妇从第一产程开始到分娩结束的FHR信号进行监测。两名产科专家一起对系统中的FHR信号进行注释,以确定FHR的基线以及加速/减速。然后使用我们的心电网络(CTGNet)和传统方法自动分析FHR信号的基线和加速/减速。计算结果与产科专家提供的注释进行比较,并应用十倍交叉验证来评估它们。以基线、加速F-measure (Acc.F-measure)、减速F-measure (Dec.F-measure)和形态分析不一致指数(MADI)之间的均方根差(RMSD)作为评价指标。数据分析采用配对t检验。结果:CTGNet的均方根偏差优于Mantel提出的最佳传统方法。提单(1.7935±0.8099和2.0293±0.9267,t =−3.55,P = 0.004), Acc。F-measure(86.8562±10.9422和72.2367±14.2096,t = 12.43, P < 0.001), Dec.F-measure(72.1038±33.2592和58.5040±38.0276,t = 4.10, P < 0.001), SI(34.8277±20.9595和54.8049±25.0265,t =−9.39,P < 0.001), MADI(3.1741±1.9901和3.7289±2.7253,t =−2.74,P = 0.012)。因此,所提出的CTGNet在所有评价指标上都比最佳传统方法具有显著的优势。结论:提出的基于人工智能的CTGNet方法在基于心电数据的FHR自动分析方面具有良好的性能。它有望成为未来智能产科系统的关键组成部分。
{"title":"CTGNet: Automatic Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate from Cardiotocograph Using Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Mei Zhong, Hao Yi, Fan Lai, Mujun Liu, Rongdan Zeng, Xue Kang, Yahui Xiao, J. Rong, Huijin Wang, Jieyun Bai, Yaosheng Lu","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000147","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This study investigates the efficacy of analyzing fetal heart rate (FHR) signals based on Artificial Intelligence to obtain a baseline calculation and identify accelerations/decelerations in the FHR through electronic fetal monitoring during labor. Methods: A total of 43,888 cardiotocograph(CTG) records of female patients in labor from January 2012 to December 2020 were collected from the NanFang Hospital of Southern Medical University. After filtering the data, 2341 FHR records were used for the study. The ObVue fetal monitoring system, manufactured by Lian-Med Technology Co. Ltd., was used to monitor the FHR signals for these pregnant women from the beginning of the first stage of labor to the end of delivery. Two obstetric experts together annotated the FHR signals in the system to determine the baseline as well as accelerations/decelerations of the FHR. Our cardiotocograph network (CTGNet) as well as traditional methods were then used to automatically analyze the baseline and acceleration/deceleration of the FHR signals. The results of calculations were compared with the annotations provided by the obstetric experts, and ten-fold cross-validation was applied to evaluate them. The root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between the baselines, acceleration F-measure (Acc.F-measure), deceleration F-measure (Dec.F-measure), and the morphological analysis discordance index (MADI) were used as evaluation metrics. The data were analyzed by using a paired t-test. Results: The proposed CTGNet was superior to the best traditional method, proposed by Mantel, in terms of the RMSD.BL (1.7935 ± 0.8099 vs. 2.0293 ± 0.9267, t = −3.55 , P = 0.004), Acc.F-measure (86.8562 ± 10.9422 vs. 72.2367 ± 14.2096, t = 12.43, P <0.001), Dec.F-measure (72.1038 ± 33.2592 vs. 58.5040 ± 38.0276, t = 4.10, P <0.001), SI (34.8277±20.9595 vs. 54.8049 ± 25.0265, t = −9.39, P <0.001), and MADI (3.1741 ± 1.9901 vs. 3.7289 ± 2.7253, t = −2.74, P = 0.012). The proposed CTGNet thus had significant advantages over the best traditional method on all evaluation metrics. Conclusion: The proposed Artificial Intelligence-based method CTGNet delivers good performance in terms of the automatic analysis of FHR based on cardiotocograph data. It promises to be a key component of smart obstetrics systems of the future.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48766510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The Advent of a New Era of Antenatal Cardiotocography 产前心脏病学新时代的到来
Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI: 10.1097/fm9.0000000000000144
Yang Zhang, Qiongjie Zhou, Xiaotian Li
{"title":"The Advent of a New Era of Antenatal Cardiotocography","authors":"Yang Zhang, Qiongjie Zhou, Xiaotian Li","doi":"10.1097/fm9.0000000000000144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000144","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47800499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two Successful Livebirths from Both Hemiuteruses After Laparoscopic Cervical Cerclage in a Uterus Didelphys Patient with Cervical Insufficiency Didelphys子宫颈功能不全患者腹腔镜宫颈环扎术后两次成功产子
Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.1097/fm9.0000000000000143
Limei Zhang, X. Zhong, Yuqing Chen, Tianyu Peng, Liyun Yu, Jian Cai, S. Yao, Zilian Wang
{"title":"Two Successful Livebirths from Both Hemiuteruses After Laparoscopic Cervical Cerclage in a Uterus Didelphys Patient with Cervical Insufficiency","authors":"Limei Zhang, X. Zhong, Yuqing Chen, Tianyu Peng, Liyun Yu, Jian Cai, S. Yao, Zilian Wang","doi":"10.1097/fm9.0000000000000143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000143","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46516677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety of Internal Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring During Labor 分娩过程中胎儿心率内部电子监测的安全性
Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000145
Yiheng Liang, Yun Li, Chunhua Huang, Xiaohong Li, Qiaoqing Cai, Jiying Peng, S. Fan
Abstract Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of internal electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during labor. Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study, which was an analysis of monitoring FHR with a fetal scalp electrode or a Doppler probe (94 pregnant women per group). In the internal monitoring group, when the opening of the uterine orifice was ≥3 cm, the fetal scalp electrode was placed after natural or artificial rupture of the membrane. FHR was simultaneously monitored using a Doppler probe. In the external monitoring group, continuous FHR monitoring was performed using an ultrasound Doppler transducer fixed on the maternal abdomen. The toco transducer was used to record uterine contractions. Pathological examination of the placenta was performed prospectively in 49 and 48 cases in the internal electronic FHR monitoring group and control group, respectively. Maternal-infant outcomes (e.g. fever, puerperal infection, puerperal morbidity, delivery mode, Apgar score, and scalp injury) were recorded. Umbilical artery blood was extracted for blood gas analysis. Differences between the two groups were compared using the paired t-test, χ2 test, Yates corrected χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results: Non-statistically significant differences between the internal and external monitoring groups were observed in the incidence of neonatal acidosis (1/94 (1.06%) vs. 3/94 (3.19%), respectively; χ2 = 0.255, P = 0.613), cesarean section/operative vaginal delivery (8/94 (8.51%) vs. 15/94 (15.96%), respectively; χ2 = 2.427, P = 0.181), fever during labor (18/94 (19.15%) vs. 15/94 (15.96%), respectively; χ2 = 0.331, P = 0.565), puerperal morbidity (2/94 (2.13%) vs. 3/94 (3.19%), respectively; χ2 = 0.000, P = 1.000), chorioamnionitis (9/49 (18.37%) vs. 7/48 (14.58%), respectively; χ2 = 0.252, P = 0.616), and neonatal asphyxia (0/94 (0.00%) vs. 1/94 (1.06%), respectively; χ2 = 0.000, P = 1.000). There were no puerperal infections, neonatal scalp injuries, or scalp abscesses found in either group. Using the internal monitoring value as reference, the incidence of FHR false deceleration in external FHR monitoring was 20.21% (19/94 women). Conclusion: Internal FHR monitoring during labor does not increase the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes. External monitoring was associated with FHR false decelerations.
摘要目的:探讨产程胎儿内部电子心率(FHR)监测的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,分析了用胎儿头皮电极或多普勒探头监测FHR的情况(每组94名孕妇)。在内部监测组中,当子宫口开口≥3 在膜自然或人工破裂后放置胎儿头皮电极。同时使用多普勒探头监测FHR。在外部监测组中,使用固定在母体腹部的超声多普勒换能器进行连续FHR监测。生育酚传感器用于记录子宫收缩。分别在内部电子FHR监测组和对照组中对49例和48例胎盘进行了前瞻性的病理检查。记录母婴结局(如发烧、产褥感染、产褥发病率、分娩方式、阿普加评分和头皮损伤)。提取脐带动脉血进行血气分析。使用配对t检验、χ2检验、Yates校正χ2检验或Fisher精确检验比较两组之间的差异。结果:内部和外部监测组的新生儿酸中毒发生率差异无统计学意义(分别为1/94(1.06%)和3/94(3.19%);χ2 = 0.255,P = 0.613),剖宫产/阴道手术分娩(分别为8/94(8.51%)和15/94(15.96%);χ2 = 2.427,P = 0.181),产程发热(分别为18/94(19.15%)和15/94(15.96%);χ2 = 0.331,P = 产褥期发病率分别为2/94(2.13%)和3/94(3.19%);χ2 = 0.000,P = 1.000),绒毛膜羊膜炎(分别为9/49(18.37%)和7/48(14.58%);χ2 = 0.252,P = 0.616)和新生儿窒息(分别为0/94(0.00%)和1/94(1.06%);χ2 = 0.000,P = 1.000)。两组均未发现产褥期感染、新生儿头皮损伤或头皮脓肿。以内部监测值为参考,外部FHR监测中FHR假减速的发生率为20.21%(19/94名女性)。结论:产程内FHR监测不会增加围产期不良结局的发生率。外部监测与FHR假减速相关。
{"title":"Safety of Internal Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring During Labor","authors":"Yiheng Liang, Yun Li, Chunhua Huang, Xiaohong Li, Qiaoqing Cai, Jiying Peng, S. Fan","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000145","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of internal electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during labor. Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study, which was an analysis of monitoring FHR with a fetal scalp electrode or a Doppler probe (94 pregnant women per group). In the internal monitoring group, when the opening of the uterine orifice was ≥3 cm, the fetal scalp electrode was placed after natural or artificial rupture of the membrane. FHR was simultaneously monitored using a Doppler probe. In the external monitoring group, continuous FHR monitoring was performed using an ultrasound Doppler transducer fixed on the maternal abdomen. The toco transducer was used to record uterine contractions. Pathological examination of the placenta was performed prospectively in 49 and 48 cases in the internal electronic FHR monitoring group and control group, respectively. Maternal-infant outcomes (e.g. fever, puerperal infection, puerperal morbidity, delivery mode, Apgar score, and scalp injury) were recorded. Umbilical artery blood was extracted for blood gas analysis. Differences between the two groups were compared using the paired t-test, χ2 test, Yates corrected χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results: Non-statistically significant differences between the internal and external monitoring groups were observed in the incidence of neonatal acidosis (1/94 (1.06%) vs. 3/94 (3.19%), respectively; χ2 = 0.255, P = 0.613), cesarean section/operative vaginal delivery (8/94 (8.51%) vs. 15/94 (15.96%), respectively; χ2 = 2.427, P = 0.181), fever during labor (18/94 (19.15%) vs. 15/94 (15.96%), respectively; χ2 = 0.331, P = 0.565), puerperal morbidity (2/94 (2.13%) vs. 3/94 (3.19%), respectively; χ2 = 0.000, P = 1.000), chorioamnionitis (9/49 (18.37%) vs. 7/48 (14.58%), respectively; χ2 = 0.252, P = 0.616), and neonatal asphyxia (0/94 (0.00%) vs. 1/94 (1.06%), respectively; χ2 = 0.000, P = 1.000). There were no puerperal infections, neonatal scalp injuries, or scalp abscesses found in either group. Using the internal monitoring value as reference, the incidence of FHR false deceleration in external FHR monitoring was 20.21% (19/94 women). Conclusion: Internal FHR monitoring during labor does not increase the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes. External monitoring was associated with FHR false decelerations.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45974949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computerized Analysis of Antepartum Cardiotocography: A Review 产前产心造影的计算机分析:综述
Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000141
Gabriel Davis Jones, W. Cooke, M. Vatish, C. Redman
Abstract Cardiotocography measures the human fetal heart rate and uterine activity using ultrasound. While it has been a mainstay in antepartum care since the 1960s, cardiotocograms consist of complex signals that have proven difficult for clinicians to interpret accurately and as such clinical inference is often difficult and unreliable. Previous attempts at codifying approaches to analyzing the features within these signals have failed to demonstrate reliability or gain sufficient traction. Since the early 1990s, the Dawes-Redman system of automated computer analysis of cardiotocography signals has enabled robust analysis of cardiotocographic signal features, employing empirically-derived criteria for assessing fetal wellbeing in the antepartum. Over the past 30 years, the Dawes-Redman system has been iteratively updated, now incorporating analyses from over 100,000 pregnancies. In this review, we examine the history of cardiotocography, signal processing methodologies and feature identification, the development of the Dawes-Redman system, and its clinical applications.
摘要心脏分娩描记术使用超声波测量人类胎儿心率和子宫活动。尽管自20世纪60年代以来,心脏图一直是产前护理的支柱,但事实证明,心脏图由复杂的信号组成,临床医生很难准确解读,因此临床推断往往很困难,也不可靠。以前试图将分析这些信号中特征的方法编纂成法典,但未能证明其可靠性或获得足够的牵引力。自20世纪90年代初以来,Dawes-Redman心脏分娩图信号的自动计算机分析系统已经能够对心脏分娩图的信号特征进行稳健的分析,采用经验推导的标准来评估产前胎儿的健康状况。在过去的30年里,Dawes-Redman系统不断更新,现在纳入了超过100000例妊娠的分析。在这篇综述中,我们研究了心脏分娩造影的历史、信号处理方法和特征识别、Dawes-Redman系统的发展及其临床应用。
{"title":"Computerized Analysis of Antepartum Cardiotocography: A Review","authors":"Gabriel Davis Jones, W. Cooke, M. Vatish, C. Redman","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000141","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cardiotocography measures the human fetal heart rate and uterine activity using ultrasound. While it has been a mainstay in antepartum care since the 1960s, cardiotocograms consist of complex signals that have proven difficult for clinicians to interpret accurately and as such clinical inference is often difficult and unreliable. Previous attempts at codifying approaches to analyzing the features within these signals have failed to demonstrate reliability or gain sufficient traction. Since the early 1990s, the Dawes-Redman system of automated computer analysis of cardiotocography signals has enabled robust analysis of cardiotocographic signal features, employing empirically-derived criteria for assessing fetal wellbeing in the antepartum. Over the past 30 years, the Dawes-Redman system has been iteratively updated, now incorporating analyses from over 100,000 pregnancies. In this review, we examine the history of cardiotocography, signal processing methodologies and feature identification, the development of the Dawes-Redman system, and its clinical applications.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42155038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1