Advances in wound care最新文献

Objective: This is the first clinical trial to evaluate the analgesic effect of 10 and 20 mg of morphine used in a postoperative dressing with patients after surgical debridement of burn wounds. Approach: In this randomized controlled trial, 20 adult patients with third-degree flame burns, who had undergone surgical debridement under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to either group A, whose members were treated with a burn dressing that contained 10 mg of morphine, or group B, whose members were treated with a burn dressing that contained 20 mg of morphine; the dressing was also soaked with octenidine and phenoxyethanol in the case of both groups. The plasma morphine concentrations were measured 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after surgery, while the level of pain intensity was determined on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS), and the occurrence of side effects was observed. Results: The serum morphine concentration levels were very low, but statistically different between the two groups at all time points. The NRS value was similar in both groups at all time points (p > 0.05). Despite this, in group B, the NRS value was 0 in all patients in postoperative hours 1, 2, and 3. No adverse effect of morphine sulfate was observed in any patient. Innovation: This project is the first clinical study to have demonstrated that morphine administered in dressings in concentrations of 0.02-0.08 mg/mL significantly reduces the occurrence of pain. Conclusion: The use of morphine in dressings after surgical treatment of burn wounds is very effective when it comes to pain management and is safe for the patient.

Objective: A few studies have focused on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic non-responsive pressure skin ulcers. The aim of this study was to assess how correct treatment (advanced wound care [AWC] dressings alone or vacuum assisted closure [VAC] therapy alone) changes the QoL of these patients. Approach: One hundred six patients with chronic non-responsive pressure skin ulcers, who had previously used galenic dressings, applied without proper therapeutic indication, were included in this study. We administered the WOUND-Q, at time 0 and after 1 month of appropriate therapy, to assess patient-reported outcome measures. Group 1 consisted of 30 patients treated with advanced dressings, Group 2: 22 patients treated with VAC therapy, and Group 3: 30 patients continuing conventional galenic dressings (Control group). Statistical analysis allowed us to analyze QoL changes over time and to compare WOUND-Q Group 1 and 2 deltas with those of Group 3. The study followed the STROBE statement. Results and Innovation: In all the scales evaluated (Assessment, Drainage, Smell, Life impact, Psychological, Social, Sleep and Dressing), there were significant improvements in mean values for Groups 1 and 2. Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn's multiple-comparisons tests and Brown-Forsythe and Welch Analysis of Variance tests demonstrated significant differences between deltas of Group 1 and Group 2 compared with those of Group 3 for most scales analyzed. Conclusions: Administration of the WOUND-Q demonstrated that the application of advanced dressings alone or VAC therapy alone positively affects the QoL of patients with chronic nonresponsive pressure wounds, in comparison with galenic dressings alone. The WOUND-Q has been shown to be a valid tool in studying changes in QoL of these patients.

Significance: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are the most common venous disease, mainly presenting as open skin lesions on the legs or feet and are an important concern in clinical care settings. Recent Advances: Comprehensive tactics were employed to search electronic databases PubMed, Embase, guideline databases, and society websites were searched for Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on VLU care. The basic information, recommendations for the VLUs, methodological quality, and reporting quality of VLU's CPGs were extracted and captured in Excel. The quality of each CPG was independently assessed by four researchers using AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT checklist. Critical Issues: This study included 19 CPGs with a combined 23 recommendations. The assessment of VLUs was summarized based on the recommendations of VLUs in 11 major items; six on VLU's diagnosis and six on therapeutic strategies of VLUs. The identified CPGs were of mixed quality, and the highest score based on the scope and purpose was 82.85 ± 11.66, whereas the lowest mean score based on the editorial independence by AGREE II was 59.93 ± 21.50. Regarding the RIGHT checklist, field one (basic information) had the highest reporting rate (84.33%), whereas field five (review and quality assurance) had the lowest quality of CPGs (41.11%). Future Directions: This evidence map provided new perspectives in the presentation of evidence. In addition, the evidence map collected and evaluated the characteristics of published CPGs. Thus, the evidence map enhances our knowledge and promotes the development of trustworthy CPGs for VLUs.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (PNPWT) in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and other wound complications in closed abdominal incisions. Approach: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label parallel arm superiority randomized controlled trial conducted over 2 years. Participants were randomly assigned to PNPWT and standard surgical dressing (SSD) group. The occurrence of postoperative SSI within 30 days, other wound-related complications, length of hospital (LOH) stay, and readmission within 1 month among both the study group were studied. Results: A total of 140 participants were included, with 70 each randomized to the PNPWT and SSD groups. In this study, 28.5% and 5.8% developed SSI in the SSD and PNPWT groups, respectively (relative risk = 0.26; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.80; p = 0.001). Similarly, the incidence of seroma (7.2% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.016), wound dehiscence (0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.244), superficial and deep SSI (5.7% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.001) and (0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.244), and LOH stay (days) (9 vs. 10.5, p = 0.07) were less in PNPWT compared to SSD group. Innovation: Despite the advances in surgical care, SSI rates continue to be high. The present findings might facilitate the use of PNPWT as a novel preventive strategy to reduce SSI in closed abdominal incision. Conclusion: The PNPWT in closed incisions following elective laparotomy can reduce the incidence of SSI when compared to SSD. The use of PNPWT was associated with a lower incidence of superficial SSI and seroma but without significant reduction in hospital stay. Clinical Trial Registry India: CTRI/2020/11/028795.

Objective: Hydrolyzed collagen-based matrices are widely used as wound care dressings. Information on the mechanism of action of such dressings is scanty. The objective of this study was to test the effect of a specific hydrolyzed collagen powder (HCP), which is extensively used for wound care management in the United States. Approach: The effects of HCP on resolution of wound inflammation, perfusion, closure, and breaking strength of the repaired skin were studied in an experimental murine model. Results: In early (day 7) inflammatory phase of wound macrophages, HCP treatment boosted phagocytosis and efferocytosis of wound-site macrophages. In these cells, inducible reactive oxygen species were also higher on day (d) 7. HCP treatment potentiated the expression of anti-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-10 cytokine and proangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production. Excisional wounds dressed with HCP showed complete closure on day 21, while the control wounds remained open. HCP treatment also demonstrated improved quality of wound healing as marked by the improved breaking strength of the closed wound tissue/repaired skin. Innovation: These data represent first evidence on the mechanism of action of clinically used HCP. Conclusion: HCP dressing favorably influenced both wound inflammation and vascularization. Improved breaking strength of HCP-treated repaired skin lays the rationale for future studies testing the hypothesis that HCP-treated closed wounds would show fewer recurrences.

Objective: To conduct a systematic literature review to study the effects of fish-based biomaterials on wound healing in both in vivo and in vitro animal models. Approach: This review covers the study reported in different articles between 2016 and August 2022 concentrating mainly on the cytotoxicity evaluation of different fish-based biomaterials on inflammation, reepithelialization and wound healing. Significance: This review shows considerable amount of research work carried out with fish-based biomaterials and collagen for treating burn wounds. Surprisingly there are only a few commercial products developed so far in this particular regard for surgical purpose and therefore, there is a way out and need for developing medical support product from fish-based biomaterials to treat and cure wounds. Recent Advances: Three-dimensional skin bioprinting technique is a large-scale solution for severe burn wounds that requires collagen as a raw material for printing, wherein fish collagen can be used in place of bovine and porcine, as it is biocompatible, promotes cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration, and degrades enzymatically. In the recent times, there are a few fish-based surgical products that have been formulated by Kerecis in United States. Critical Issues: The different fish-based biomaterial products are all mere supplements taken in orally as food or supplements till date and there is no proper proven medications that has been formulated so far in the field of wound healing and inflammation based on fish biomaterials except the surgical products that can be finger counted. Future Directions: Fish-based biomaterials are known for the medicinal properties that are used throughout the world and further investigations should be carried out to understand the actual physiochemical properties of its derivatives for the discovery of novel products and drugs.

Objective: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that can establish chronic infections and form biofilm in wounds. Because the wound environment is largely devoid of oxygen, P. aeruginosa may rely on anaerobic metabolism, such as nitrate respiration, to survive in wounds. While nitrate reductase (Nar) typically reduces nitrate to nitrite, it can also reduce chlorate to chlorite, which is a toxic oxidizing agent. Therefore, chlorate can act as a prodrug to specifically eradicate hypoxic/anoxic, nitrate-respiring P. aeruginosa populations, which are often tolerant to conventional antibiotic treatments. Approach: Using a diabetic mouse model for chronic wounds, we tested the role that anaerobic nitrate respiration plays in supporting chronic P. aeruginosa infections. Results: P. aeruginosa forms biofilm deep within the wound where the environment is anoxic. Daily treatment of P. aeruginosa-infected wounds with chlorate supported wound healing. Chlorate treatment was as effective as a treatment with ciprofloxacin (a conventional antibiotic that targets both oxic and hypoxic/anoxic P. aeruginosa populations). Chlorate-treated wounds showed markers of good-quality wound healing, including well-formed granulation tissue, reepithelialization and microvessel development. Loss- and gain-of-function experiments showed that P. aeruginosa requires nitrate respiration to establish a chronic wound infection and form biofilms. Innovation: We show that the small molecule chlorate, kills the opportunistic pathogen, P. aeruginosa, by targeting a form of anaerobic metabolism called nitrate respiration. Conclusion: Chlorate holds promise as a treatment to combat diverse bacterial infections where oxygen is limiting and/or where pathogens grow as biofilms because many other pathogens possess Nar and survive using anaerobic metabolism.

Significance: With the increasing diabetic population worldwide, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a significant concern. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of skin substitutes, biomaterials, and topical agents with standard care. Recent Advances: A meta-analysis was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: diabetes mellitus AND skin graft OR tissue replacement OR dressing OR drug. Two independent reviewers performed data collection and quality assessment of the eligible studies. The primary outcome was the 12- to 16-week healing rates and the secondary outcome was recurrence rates. Critical Issues: Thirty-eight randomized controlled trials, including 3,862 patients, were analyzed. The studies exhibited low heterogeneity (τ² = 0.10) without significant asymmetry (Egger's test, p = 0.8852). After pooling direct and indirect estimates, placenta-based tissue products exhibited the best wound healing probability (p-score = 0.90), followed by skin substitutes with living cells (p-score = 0.70), acellular skin substitutes (p-score = 0.56), and advanced topical dressings (p-score = 0.34) compared with standard of care. The recurrence analysis showed significant improvement in the intervention group compared with the control group (11.21% vs. 15.15%). Future Directions: This network meta-analysis provides the relative effectiveness and rank of biomaterials and topical dressings in DFU healing. The results could help clinical decision making.

Objective: The objective of this study is to characterize breath-hold (BH)-induced oxygenation changes in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and develop an oxygenation flow index (OFI) to discern nonhealing from healing DFUs. Approach: The imaging approach utilizes an innovative BH stimulus that induces vasoconstriction and measures for altering oxygenation flow in and around the tissues of DFUs and controls. The modified Beer-Lambert law was utilized to calculate hemoglobin-based spatiotemporal oxygenation maps in terms of oxygen saturation. Results: We found controls had synchronous BH-induced oxygenation changes across the dorsal (OFI: 29.0%) and plantar (OFI: 57.6%) aspects of the foot. Nonhealing DFUs, however, had less synchronous BH-induced oxygenation changes (OFI <28%). In addition, two complicated healing DFU cases, or cases with underlying issues or poor long-term healing outcomes, were observed to have OFIs <28%. Innovation: An OFI was developed to differentiate nonhealing DFUs from healing DFUs using a single, noncontact, near-infrared optical scanner for spatiotemporal oxygenation monitoring. The OFI has potential to provide immediate feedback on the microcirculation in DFUs, through hemoglobin-based oxygenation parameters. Conclusion: A preliminary threshold (OFI <28%) could differentiate nonhealing and complicated DFUs from healing DFUs. The overall oxygenation flow pattern was less synchronous (or the OFI value reduced) in the nonwound areas of the feet that were nonhealing. In other words, the reduced OFI value (<28%) in the entire foot, excluding the wound region is a possible indicator that the wound may not heal.

Objective: Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel FDA-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was previously shown to significantly prevent and disrupt burn biofilm infection in preclinical studies. Based on this observation, the purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the WED dressing powered by a silver-zinc electrocouple in the prevention and disruption of biofilm infection. Approach: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the WED compared with standard-of-care (SoC) dressing to treat biofilms. Burn wounds were randomized to receive either SoC or WED. Biopsies were collected on days 0 and 7 for histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of biofilm, and for quantitative bacteriological analyses. Results: In total, 38 subjects were enrolled in the study. In 52% of the WED-treated wounds, little to no biofilm could be detected by SEM. WED significantly lowered or prevented increase of biofilm in all wounds compared with the pair-matched SoC-treated wounds. Innovation: WED is a simple, easy, and rapid method to protect the wound while also inhibiting infection. It is activated by a moist environment and the electrical field induces transient and micromolar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that will prevent bacterial growth. Conclusion: WED decreased biofilm infection better compared with SoC. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04079998.