Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) encountered in clinical practice. In the absence of an accurate biomarker for the disorder, IBS is mainly diagnosed based symptomology using the Rome criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the disorder, finding the correct treatment option is often challenging. In general, lifestyle and dietary changes, including the low-FODMAP of gluten-free diet, are the first-in-line treatment for all patients. Issues with dietary changes are the strict elimination of multiple food products and hence difficult compliance to the diet. When lifestyle changes do not lead to adequate symptom relief, patients should be treated according to their predominant bowel habits and most prominent symptoms. Laxatives or prokinetics and antidiarrheals are used to treat constipation and diarrhea respectively, but have little effect on abdominal pain. To treat gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms, antispasmodics can be attributed. Low doses of neuromodulators can help gain control over GI and central symptoms, but are also prone to more severe side effects, restricting their widespread use. Refractory IBS symptoms can be treated with probiotics, antibiotics, histamine-receptor antagonists or alternative therapy, including psychotherapy, hypnotherapy, acupuncture or phytomedicines. However, for many of these options, scientific evidence is sparse and high-quality research is often lacking, leading to inconclusive results. In general, all of the available treatment options only provide symptom relief for a subset of patients. This review provides a full overview of the diagnostic process and currently available treatment options for IBS.
Background: Despite the well-known risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, the WHO FRAX tool has been used in a limited number of studies in this specific population. The purpose of this study was to search for predictors of risk of fractures assessed by FRAX score.
Methods: We prospectively calculated FRAX score for hip and major osteoporotic fractures in inflammatory bowel disease patients consecutively recruited.
Results: The mean risk of hip fractures at 10 years, for the 80 recruited patients, resulted 1.4%, while the mean risk of major osteoporotic fractures was 7.8%. The risk of hip fractures was 1.3% among the 30 Crohn's disease patients versus 1.4% (P=0.82) among 50 ulcerative colitis patients. A prolonged use of corticosteroids correlated with a tendency to a greater risk of hip fracture (r=0.38, P=0.08). Patients with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values had a risk of osteoporotic hip fractures of 0.75%, while those with high ESR values had a risk of 1.86% (P=0.04). Regarding the risk of major bone fractures, patients with normal ESR values had a risk of 5.9%, versus a risk of 18% in those with elevated ESR (P=0.03).
Conclusions: The correlation between increase of inflammatory markers and increased risk of osteoporotic fractures and the lack of difference between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis suggest a central role of inflammation over malabsorption in this population.