首页 > 最新文献

NIHR open research最新文献

英文 中文
Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review 英国和爱尔兰为增加服务不足群体在随机试验中的代表性而采取的有效干预措施:范围界定文献综述
Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1
K. Biggs, Caroline Dix, Frances Shiely, Shaun Treweek, V. Shepherd, Athene Lane, Heidi R Green, Talia Isaacs, Andrew Willis, Cindy Cooper
Background Participants in clinical trials often do not reflect the populations that could benefit from the treatments being investigated. There are known barriers to trial participation for under-served groups, but limited evidence on strategies to alleviate these barriers to improve representation. This scoping review aimed to identify effective interventions and design features that improve the representation `of under-served groups in trials, focusing on the UK and Ireland. Methods We included methodological research studies that reported interventions to improve representation of ethnic minority groups, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, older people, or those with impaired capacity to consent to randomised controlled trials, conducted in the UK and Ireland, published between 2000–2021. Systematic searches were conducted in November 2021 and data were independently extracted by two authors and narratively synthesised. Results Seven studies were included: one randomised controlled study embedded in five trials, one mixed-methods study, and five studies reporting ‘lessons learnt’ from one trial. We categorised the 47 reported interventions or strategies into nine broad themes: Recruitment sites, recruitment settings, community engagement, and communication with participants, incentives, inclusion criteria, flexibility, patient documentation, and the consent process. Only 28/47 interventions were evaluated, 23 of which were comparison of recruitment pathways. The randomised study found that a £100 incentive mentioned in the invitation letter increased positive responses overall across drug trials in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, but not for older people or those living in the most deprived areas. Invitation letters via GPs and working with communities were reported as successful recruitment pathways in recruiting different under-served populations. Conclusions Interventions aiming to improve the recruitment of under-served groups in the UK and Ireland were reported across seven papers, but their effectiveness was rarely rigorously evaluated. Included studies were context specific. Using a variety of recruitment methods is likely to help achieve a more diverse cohort.
背景 临床试验的参与者往往不能反映可从所研究的治疗中受益的人群。众所周知,服务不足群体在参与试验时会遇到一些障碍,但有关减轻这些障碍以提高代表性的策略的证据却很有限。本次范围界定综述旨在以英国和爱尔兰为重点,确定有效的干预措施和设计特点,以提高 "服务不足群体 "在试验中的代表性。方法 我们纳入了 2000-2021 年间在英国和爱尔兰进行的方法学研究,这些研究报道了为提高少数民族群体、社会经济弱势群体、老年人或能力受损者在随机对照试验中的代表性而采取的干预措施。2021 年 11 月进行了系统检索,由两位作者独立提取数据并进行叙述性综合。结果 共纳入七项研究:一项随机对照研究包含在五项试验中,一项混合方法研究,以及五项报告从一项试验中 "吸取教训 "的研究。我们将 47 项报告的干预措施或策略分为九大主题:招募地点、招募环境、社区参与、与参与者的沟通、激励措施、纳入标准、灵活性、患者文件以及同意程序。只有 28/47 项干预措施接受了评估,其中 23 项是对招募途径的比较。随机研究发现,邀请信中提到的 100 英镑奖励措施提高了心血管疾病和高血压药物试验参与者的积极反应,但对于老年人或生活在最贫困地区的人来说,积极反应并不明显。据报道,通过全科医生发出邀请函以及与社区合作是招募不同服务不足人群的成功招募途径。结论 有七篇论文报道了旨在改善英国和爱尔兰服务不足人群招募情况的干预措施,但很少对其有效性进行严格评估。所纳入的研究具有特定的背景。使用各种招募方法可能有助于获得更多样化的群体。
{"title":"Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review","authors":"K. Biggs, Caroline Dix, Frances Shiely, Shaun Treweek, V. Shepherd, Athene Lane, Heidi R Green, Talia Isaacs, Andrew Willis, Cindy Cooper","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Participants in clinical trials often do not reflect the populations that could benefit from the treatments being investigated. There are known barriers to trial participation for under-served groups, but limited evidence on strategies to alleviate these barriers to improve representation. This scoping review aimed to identify effective interventions and design features that improve the representation `of under-served groups in trials, focusing on the UK and Ireland. Methods We included methodological research studies that reported interventions to improve representation of ethnic minority groups, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, older people, or those with impaired capacity to consent to randomised controlled trials, conducted in the UK and Ireland, published between 2000–2021. Systematic searches were conducted in November 2021 and data were independently extracted by two authors and narratively synthesised. Results Seven studies were included: one randomised controlled study embedded in five trials, one mixed-methods study, and five studies reporting ‘lessons learnt’ from one trial. We categorised the 47 reported interventions or strategies into nine broad themes: Recruitment sites, recruitment settings, community engagement, and communication with participants, incentives, inclusion criteria, flexibility, patient documentation, and the consent process. Only 28/47 interventions were evaluated, 23 of which were comparison of recruitment pathways. The randomised study found that a £100 incentive mentioned in the invitation letter increased positive responses overall across drug trials in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, but not for older people or those living in the most deprived areas. Invitation letters via GPs and working with communities were reported as successful recruitment pathways in recruiting different under-served populations. Conclusions Interventions aiming to improve the recruitment of under-served groups in the UK and Ireland were reported across seven papers, but their effectiveness was rarely rigorously evaluated. Included studies were context specific. Using a variety of recruitment methods is likely to help achieve a more diverse cohort.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140382217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A randomised crossover trial of tezacaftor-ivacaftor for gut dysfunction in cystic fibrosis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes: a pilot study. 针对囊性纤维化肠道功能紊乱的 tezacaftor-ivacaftor 与磁共振成像(MRI)结果的随机交叉试验:一项试点研究。
Pub Date : 2024-03-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13510.2
Christabella Ng, Neele S Dellschaft, Caroline Hoad, Luca Marciani, Robin Spiller, Colin Crooks, Trevor Hill, Alex Menys, Jochen G Mainz, Helen Barr, Penny A Gowland, Giles Major, Alan R Smyth

Background: People with cystic fibrosis (CF) can experience recurrent chest infections, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and gastrointestinal symptoms. New cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs improve lung function but gastrointestinal effects are unclear. We aimed to see if a CFTR modulator (tezacaftor-ivacaftor,TEZ/IVA) improves gastrointestinal outcomes in CF.

Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover trial (2019-2020) at Nottingham University Hospitals. The effects of TEZ/IVA on gut physiology were measured using MRI. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment sequences AB or BA (A:TEZ/IVA, B:placebo, each 28 days), with a 28-day washout period. Participants had serial MRI scans at baseline and after 19-23 days of each treatment. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a protocol amendment allowed for observer-blind comparisons prior to and during TEZ/IVA. In such cases, participants were not blind to the treatment but researchers remained blind. The primary outcome was oro-caecal transit time (OCTT). Secondary outcomes included MRI metrics, symptoms and stool biomarkers.

Results: We randomised 13 participants. Before the COVID-19 pandemic 8 participants completed the full protocol and 1 dropped out. The remaining 4 participants followed the amended protocol. There were no significant differences between placebo and TEZ/IVA for OCTT (TEZ/IVA >360minutes [225,>360] vs. placebo 330minutes [285,>360], p=0.8) or secondary outcomes. There were no adverse events.

Conclusions: Our data contribute to a research gap in the extra-pulmonary effects of CFTR modulators. We found no effect after TEZ/IVA on MRI metrics of gut function, GI symptoms or stool calprotectin. Effects might be detectable with larger studies, longer treatment or more effective CFTR modulators.

Clinicaltrialsgov registration: NCT04006873 (02/07/2019).

背景:囊性纤维化(CF)患者会反复出现胸部感染、胰腺外分泌功能不全和胃肠道症状。新型囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节器(CFTR)调节剂药物可改善肺功能,但对胃肠道的影响尚不明确。我们的目的是研究 CFTR 调节剂(tezacaftor-ivacaftor,TEZ/IVA)是否能改善 CF 患者的胃肠道症状:我们在诺丁汉大学医院开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、两期交叉试验(2019-2020年)。使用核磁共振成像测量 TEZ/IVA 对肠道生理学的影响。参与者被随机分配到AB或BA治疗序列(A:TEZ/IVA,B:安慰剂,各28天),并有28天的冲洗期。参试者在基线和每个疗程的 19-23 天后接受连续 MRI 扫描。由于 COVID-19 大流行,方案修正案允许在 TEZ/IVA 之前和期间进行观察者盲法比较。在这种情况下,参与者对治疗不设盲区,但研究人员仍保持盲区。主要结果是大便转运时间(OCTT)。次要结果包括核磁共振成像指标、症状和粪便生物标志物:我们随机抽取了 13 名参与者。在 COVID-19 大流行之前,8 名参与者完成了全部方案,1 人退出。其余 4 人按照修订后的方案进行了治疗。安慰剂和 TEZ/IVA 在 OCTT(TEZ/IVA >360 分钟 [225,>360] vs. 安慰剂 330 分钟 [285,>360], p=0.8)或次要结果方面无明显差异。无不良事件发生:我们的数据填补了CFTR调节剂肺外效应方面的研究空白。我们发现TEZ/IVA对肠道功能的核磁共振指标、消化道症状或粪便钙蛋白没有影响。如果进行更大规模的研究、延长治疗时间或使用更有效的CFTR调节剂,可能会发现效果:NCT04006873 (02/07/2019).
{"title":"A randomised crossover trial of tezacaftor-ivacaftor for gut dysfunction in cystic fibrosis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes: a pilot study.","authors":"Christabella Ng, Neele S Dellschaft, Caroline Hoad, Luca Marciani, Robin Spiller, Colin Crooks, Trevor Hill, Alex Menys, Jochen G Mainz, Helen Barr, Penny A Gowland, Giles Major, Alan R Smyth","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13510.2","DOIUrl":"10.3310/nihropenres.13510.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with cystic fibrosis (CF) can experience recurrent chest infections, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and gastrointestinal symptoms. New cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs improve lung function but gastrointestinal effects are unclear. We aimed to see if a CFTR modulator (tezacaftor-ivacaftor,TEZ/IVA) improves gastrointestinal outcomes in CF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover trial (2019-2020) at Nottingham University Hospitals. The effects of TEZ/IVA on gut physiology were measured using MRI. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment sequences AB or BA (A:TEZ/IVA, B:placebo, each 28 days), with a 28-day washout period. Participants had serial MRI scans at baseline and after 19-23 days of each treatment. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a protocol amendment allowed for observer-blind comparisons prior to and during TEZ/IVA. In such cases, participants were not blind to the treatment but researchers remained blind. The primary outcome was oro-caecal transit time (OCTT). Secondary outcomes included MRI metrics, symptoms and stool biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomised 13 participants. Before the COVID-19 pandemic 8 participants completed the full protocol and 1 dropped out. The remaining 4 participants followed the amended protocol. There were no significant differences between placebo and TEZ/IVA for OCTT (TEZ/IVA >360minutes [225,>360] vs. placebo 330minutes [285,>360], p=0.8) or secondary outcomes. There were no adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data contribute to a research gap in the extra-pulmonary effects of CFTR modulators. We found no effect after TEZ/IVA on MRI metrics of gut function, GI symptoms or stool calprotectin. Effects might be detectable with larger studies, longer treatment or more effective CFTR modulators.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrialsgov registration: </strong>NCT04006873 (02/07/2019).</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"3 ","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320032/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving hospital-based opioid substitution therapy (iHOST): protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation 改进医院阿片类药物替代疗法(iHOST):混合方法评估规程
Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13534.1
D. Lewer, Michael Brown, Adam Burns, Niamh Eastwood, Rosalind Gittens, Adam Holland, V. Hope, Aubrey Ko, Penny Lewthwaite, Ann-Marie Morris, Adrian Noctor, Andrew Preston, Jenny Scott, Erica Smith, Sedona Sweeney, N. Tilouche, Marisha Wickremsinhe, Magdalena Harris
Background Opioid substitution therapy is associated with improved health and social outcomes for people who use heroin and other illicit opioids. It is typically managed in the community and is not always continued when people are admitted to hospital. This causes opioid withdrawal, discharge against medical advice, and increased costs. We are establishing a project called iHOST (improving hospital opioid substitution therapy) to address these problems. This is an applied health research project in which we will develop and evaluate an intervention that aims to improve opioid substitution therapy in three acute hospitals in England. The intervention was developed in collaboration with stakeholders including people who use opioids, hospital staff, and other professionals who work with this group. It includes five components: (1) a card that patients can use to help hospital clinicians confirm their opioid substitution therapy, (2) a helpline for patients and staff, (3) an online training module for staff, (4) a clinical guideline for managing opioid withdrawal in hospital, and (5) ‘champion’ roles at each hospital. Methods We will do a mixed-methods study including a quasi-experimental quantitative study and a qualitative process evaluation. The primary outcomes for the quantitative study are discharge against medical advice and emergency readmission within 28 days. We will do a difference-in-difference analysis comparing changes in these outcomes for patients at iHOST sites with changes for patients at control hospitals. The process evaluation will use in-depth interviews, focus groups, and site observations with people who use opioids and staff. We will assess acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and contextual factors impacting outcomes. Impact We anticipate that iHOST will improve care for hospital patients who use illicit opioids and/or are receiving community-based opioid substitution therapy. Depending on the results, we will promote the intervention at hospitals across the UK. Dissemination, including through publication, will inform hospital-based services for people who use drugs both in the UK and other countries.
背景 阿片类药物替代疗法可改善海洛因和其他非法阿片类药物使用者的健康和社会状况。阿片类药物替代疗法通常在社区进行管理,当患者入院治疗时并不总是继续使用。这会导致阿片类药物戒断、违反医嘱出院以及费用增加。我们正在建立一个名为 iHOST(改进医院阿片类药物替代疗法)的项目来解决这些问题。这是一个应用健康研究项目,我们将开发并评估一项干预措施,旨在改善英格兰三家急症医院的阿片类药物替代疗法。该干预措施是与包括阿片类药物使用者、医院员工以及为该群体提供服务的其他专业人员在内的利益相关者合作开发的。它包括五个组成部分:(1)患者可用于帮助医院临床医生确认其阿片类药物替代疗法的卡片;(2)为患者和员工提供的帮助热线;(3)为员工提供的在线培训模块;(4)在医院管理阿片类药物戒断的临床指南;(5)各医院的 "倡导者 "角色。方法 我们将开展一项混合方法研究,包括一项准实验定量研究和一项定性过程评估。定量研究的主要结果是遵医嘱出院和 28 天内紧急再入院。我们将进行差异分析,比较 iHOST 医院与对照医院患者在这些结果上的变化。过程评估将通过深入访谈、焦点小组和现场观察等方式,对阿片类药物使用者和工作人员进行评估。我们将评估干预措施的可接受性、实施的障碍和促进因素,以及影响结果的背景因素。影响 我们预计,iHOST 将改善对使用非法阿片类药物和/或正在接受社区阿片类药物替代疗法的医院患者的护理。根据结果,我们将在英国各地的医院推广这项干预措施。通过出版等方式进行传播,将为英国和其他国家的医院吸毒者服务提供参考。
{"title":"Improving hospital-based opioid substitution therapy (iHOST): protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation","authors":"D. Lewer, Michael Brown, Adam Burns, Niamh Eastwood, Rosalind Gittens, Adam Holland, V. Hope, Aubrey Ko, Penny Lewthwaite, Ann-Marie Morris, Adrian Noctor, Andrew Preston, Jenny Scott, Erica Smith, Sedona Sweeney, N. Tilouche, Marisha Wickremsinhe, Magdalena Harris","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13534.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13534.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Opioid substitution therapy is associated with improved health and social outcomes for people who use heroin and other illicit opioids. It is typically managed in the community and is not always continued when people are admitted to hospital. This causes opioid withdrawal, discharge against medical advice, and increased costs. We are establishing a project called iHOST (improving hospital opioid substitution therapy) to address these problems. This is an applied health research project in which we will develop and evaluate an intervention that aims to improve opioid substitution therapy in three acute hospitals in England. The intervention was developed in collaboration with stakeholders including people who use opioids, hospital staff, and other professionals who work with this group. It includes five components: (1) a card that patients can use to help hospital clinicians confirm their opioid substitution therapy, (2) a helpline for patients and staff, (3) an online training module for staff, (4) a clinical guideline for managing opioid withdrawal in hospital, and (5) ‘champion’ roles at each hospital. Methods We will do a mixed-methods study including a quasi-experimental quantitative study and a qualitative process evaluation. The primary outcomes for the quantitative study are discharge against medical advice and emergency readmission within 28 days. We will do a difference-in-difference analysis comparing changes in these outcomes for patients at iHOST sites with changes for patients at control hospitals. The process evaluation will use in-depth interviews, focus groups, and site observations with people who use opioids and staff. We will assess acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and contextual factors impacting outcomes. Impact We anticipate that iHOST will improve care for hospital patients who use illicit opioids and/or are receiving community-based opioid substitution therapy. Depending on the results, we will promote the intervention at hospitals across the UK. Dissemination, including through publication, will inform hospital-based services for people who use drugs both in the UK and other countries.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140247523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence, risks and outcomes of frailty in People Experiencing Homelessness: a protocol for secondary analysis of Health Needs Audit data. 无家可归者体弱多病的患病率、风险和后果:对健康需求审计数据进行二次分析的协议。
Pub Date : 2024-03-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13545.1
Jo Dawes, Kate Walters, Rachael Frost, Emmanouil Bagkeris, Alexandra Burton, Debra Hertzberg, Andrew Hayward

Frailty describes a health state related to ageing where people become less resilient to health challenges and more likely to have adverse outcomes if they become unwell. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are known to have poor health, with research suggesting that many become frail at a younger age than the general population. Previous research using small-scale primary data collection suggests that the prevalence of frailty in homeless populations varies widely (16-55%), with variations in sample sizes and settings partially accounting for differences in current estimates. The prevalence, risks, and outcomes of frailty in PEH are poorly understood. We propose to carry out a secondary analysis of existing health survey data collected from 2,792 PEH. This will involve creating a Frailty Index (FI) to identify frail people within the dataset. Regression analyses will be used to identify associations between potential risk factors and outcomes of frailty in this population. This protocol will: 1) Outline the creation of a FI to assess the frailty prevalence within a dataset of health information collected from a cohort of PEH and 2) Describe proposed methods of regression analysis for identification of associations between frailty and risks factors/outcomes of frailty in the cohort of PEH within the dataset. The processes described in this paper can inform future development of FIs in other datasets. It is expected that the FI created will be an appropriate and robust method for identifying frailty in a cohort of PEH and results of the secondary data analysis will provide a more robust estimate of the associations between frailty and risk factors/outcomes.

衰弱是指一种与衰老有关的健康状态,在这种状态下,人们对健康挑战的抵御能力降低,一旦身体不适,更有可能出现不良后果。众所周知,无家可归者(PEH)的健康状况较差,研究表明,许多无家可归者比一般人更年轻就变得体弱多病。之前使用小规模原始数据收集方法进行的研究表明,无家可归者体弱的患病率差异很大(16%-55%),样本大小和环境的不同是造成目前估计值差异的部分原因。人们对 PEH 中体弱的流行率、风险和结果知之甚少。我们建议对从 2,792 名 PEH 收集到的现有健康调查数据进行二次分析。这将包括创建虚弱指数 (FI),以识别数据集中的虚弱人群。我们将使用回归分析来确定潜在风险因素与该人群体弱结果之间的关联。本协议将1)概述如何创建虚弱指数(FI),以评估从一组 PEH 健康信息数据集中收集的虚弱患病率;2)描述拟议的回归分析方法,以识别数据集中一组 PEH 中虚弱与风险因素/虚弱结果之间的关联。本文所描述的过程可为今后在其他数据集中开发虚弱指数提供参考。预计所创建的虚弱指数将是一种适当而稳健的方法,可用于识别 PEH 队列中的虚弱情况,而二次数据分析的结果将为虚弱与风险因素/结果之间的关联提供更稳健的估计。
{"title":"Prevalence, risks and outcomes of frailty in People Experiencing Homelessness: a protocol for secondary analysis of Health Needs Audit data.","authors":"Jo Dawes, Kate Walters, Rachael Frost, Emmanouil Bagkeris, Alexandra Burton, Debra Hertzberg, Andrew Hayward","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13545.1","DOIUrl":"10.3310/nihropenres.13545.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frailty describes a health state related to ageing where people become less resilient to health challenges and more likely to have adverse outcomes if they become unwell. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are known to have poor health, with research suggesting that many become frail at a younger age than the general population. Previous research using small-scale primary data collection suggests that the prevalence of frailty in homeless populations varies widely (16-55%), with variations in sample sizes and settings partially accounting for differences in current estimates. The prevalence, risks, and outcomes of frailty in PEH are poorly understood. We propose to carry out a secondary analysis of existing health survey data collected from 2,792 PEH. This will involve creating a Frailty Index (FI) to identify frail people within the dataset. Regression analyses will be used to identify associations between potential risk factors and outcomes of frailty in this population. This protocol will: 1) Outline the creation of a FI to assess the frailty prevalence within a dataset of health information collected from a cohort of PEH and 2) Describe proposed methods of regression analysis for identification of associations between frailty and risks factors/outcomes of frailty in the cohort of PEH within the dataset. The processes described in this paper can inform future development of FIs in other datasets. It is expected that the FI created will be an appropriate and robust method for identifying frailty in a cohort of PEH and results of the secondary data analysis will provide a more robust estimate of the associations between frailty and risk factors/outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375403/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Autonomy & advocacy in planning for a medical emergency: Adults with a learning disability and family carers’ experiences and perceptions of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process 医疗急救计划中的自主权和倡导权:有学习障碍的成年人和家庭照护者对 "建议的紧急护理和治疗简要计划"(ReSPECT)流程的体验和看法
Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1
Amy M. Russell, Jacqui M Lovell, J. Harlock, Frances Griffiths, A. Slowther
Background The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is designed to facilitate meaningful discussions between healthcare professionals, patients, and their family about preferences for treatment in future medical emergencies. People with a learning disability may face particular barriers in completing health care plans and receiving emergency treatment, however little is known about their preferences towards emergency care treatment planning. This study explores the views of people with a learning disability, and family carers about ReSPECT. Methods Online, arts-based interactive workshops were held with people with a learning disability to explore how they felt about emergency care treatment planning, and to co-produce materials to support ReSPECT conversations. Carers of people with a learning disability participated in focus groups or interviews. Data from workshops, focus groups and interviews were analysed thematically. Results Themes identified were: Getting the Process Right, Lack of trust as a barrier to ReSPECT planning, and Person-Centred Care. All groups supported the ReSPECT process. They felt that ReSPECT plans could support person-centred care, enhancing the autonomy of a person with a learning disability and supporting the advocacy of carers. However, drawing on their previous experiences of the health care system some expressed doubt that their wishes, as reflected in the recommendations, would be carried out. Suggestions were made for improving the ReSPECT process for people with a learning disability and used to develop resources to support ReSPECT planning. Conclusions Emergency care planning and ReSPECT are viewed positively by people with a learning disability and family carers. To ensure this works well for people with a learning disability attention should be given to reasonable, personalised adjustments to support their participation in planning conversations. There is a wider challenge of fostering trust in the health care system regarding treatment of people with a learning disability.
背景 《建议的紧急护理和治疗总结计划》(ReSPECT)旨在促进医护人员、患者及其家人就未来医疗紧急情况下的治疗偏好进行有意义的讨论。有学习障碍的人在完成健康护理计划和接受紧急治疗时可能会面临特殊的障碍,但人们对他们对紧急护理治疗计划的偏好却知之甚少。本研究探讨了学习障碍者和家庭照顾者对 ReSPECT 的看法。研究方法 与学习障碍者一起举办了基于艺术的在线互动研讨会,探讨他们对紧急护理治疗计划的看法,并共同制作材料以支持 ReSPECT 对话。学习障碍者的照顾者参加了焦点小组或访谈。我们对来自研讨会、焦点小组和访谈的数据进行了专题分析。结果 确定的主题有正确处理流程、缺乏信任是 ReSPECT 计划的障碍以及以人为本的护理。所有小组都支持 ReSPECT 程序。他们认为 ReSPECT 计划可以支持以人为本的护理,提高学习障碍者的自主性,并支持护理者的倡导。然而,根据他们以前在医疗保健系统中的经验,有些人对建议中反映的他们的愿望能否得到实现表示怀疑。我们为有学习障碍的人提出了改进 ReSPECT 流程的建议,并将其用于开发支持 ReSPECT 规划的资源。结论 有学习障碍的人和家庭照顾者对紧急护理计划和 ReSPECT 有积极的看法。为确保有学习障碍的人能够很好地使用,应注意进行合理的、个性化的调整,以支持他们参与规划对话。在治疗有学习障碍的人方面,如何培养人们对医疗保健系统的信任是一个更广泛的挑战。
{"title":"Autonomy & advocacy in planning for a medical emergency: Adults with a learning disability and family carers’ experiences and perceptions of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process","authors":"Amy M. Russell, Jacqui M Lovell, J. Harlock, Frances Griffiths, A. Slowther","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is designed to facilitate meaningful discussions between healthcare professionals, patients, and their family about preferences for treatment in future medical emergencies. People with a learning disability may face particular barriers in completing health care plans and receiving emergency treatment, however little is known about their preferences towards emergency care treatment planning. This study explores the views of people with a learning disability, and family carers about ReSPECT. Methods Online, arts-based interactive workshops were held with people with a learning disability to explore how they felt about emergency care treatment planning, and to co-produce materials to support ReSPECT conversations. Carers of people with a learning disability participated in focus groups or interviews. Data from workshops, focus groups and interviews were analysed thematically. Results Themes identified were: Getting the Process Right, Lack of trust as a barrier to ReSPECT planning, and Person-Centred Care. All groups supported the ReSPECT process. They felt that ReSPECT plans could support person-centred care, enhancing the autonomy of a person with a learning disability and supporting the advocacy of carers. However, drawing on their previous experiences of the health care system some expressed doubt that their wishes, as reflected in the recommendations, would be carried out. Suggestions were made for improving the ReSPECT process for people with a learning disability and used to develop resources to support ReSPECT planning. Conclusions Emergency care planning and ReSPECT are viewed positively by people with a learning disability and family carers. To ensure this works well for people with a learning disability attention should be given to reasonable, personalised adjustments to support their participation in planning conversations. There is a wider challenge of fostering trust in the health care system regarding treatment of people with a learning disability.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"50 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140257002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseline Characteristics in the Remote Diet Intervention to REduce long-COVID Symptoms Trial (ReDIRECT). 远程饮食干预以减少长期 COVID 症状试验(ReDIRECT)的基线特征。
Pub Date : 2024-03-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13522.1
Laura Haag, Janice Richardson, Caroline Haig, Yvonne Cunningham, Heather Fraser, Naomi Brosnahan, Tracy Ibbotson, Jane Ormerod, Chris White, Emma McIntosh, Kate O'Donnell, Naveed Sattar, Alex McConnachie, Mike Lean, David Blane, Emilie Combet

Background: The persistence of symptoms for ≥12 weeks after a COVID-19 infection is known as Long COVID (LC), a condition with unclear pathophysiology and no proven treatments to date. Living with obesity is a risk factor for LC and has symptoms which may overlap with and aggravate LC.

Methods: ReDIRECT is a remotely delivered trial assessing whether weight management can reduce LC symptoms. We recruited people with LC and BMI >27kg/m 2. The intervention was delivered remotely by dietitians, with online data collection (medical and dietary history, COVID-19 infection and vaccination, body composition, LC history/symptoms, blood pressure, quality of life, sociodemographic data). Participants self-selected the dominant LC symptoms they most wanted to improve from the intervention.

Results: Participants (n=234) in England (64%) and Scotland (30%) were mainly women (85%) of white ethnicity (90%), with 13% living in the 20% most deprived areas, a mean age of 46 (SD10) years, and median BMI of 35kg/m 2 (IQR 32-40). Before starting the study, 30% reported more than one COVID-19 infection (82% confirmed with one or more positive tests). LC Diagnosis was mainly by GPs (71%), other healthcare professionals (9%), or self-diagnosed (21%). The median total number of symptoms was 6 (IQR 4-8). Self-selected dominant LC symptoms included fatigue (54%), breathlessness (16%), pain (12%), anxiety/depression (1%) and "other" (17%). At baseline, 82% were taking medication, 57% reported 1+ other medical conditions. Quality of life was poor; 20% were on long-term sick leave or reduced working hours. Most (92%) reported having gained weight since contracting COVID-19 (median weight change +11.5 kg, range -11.5 to +45.3 kg).

Conclusions: Symptoms linked to LC and overweight are diverse and complex. Remote trial delivery enabled rapid recruitment across the UK yet certain groups (e.g. men and those from ethnic minority groups) were under-represented.

Trial registration: ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN12595520, 25/11/2021).

背景:COVID-19感染后症状持续≥12周被称为长COVID(LC),这种情况的病理生理学尚不清楚,至今也没有行之有效的治疗方法。肥胖是LC的一个危险因素,其症状可能与LC重叠并加重LC:方法:ReDIRECT 是一项远程交付试验,旨在评估体重管理能否减轻 LC 症状。我们招募了体重指数大于 27kg/m 2 的 LC 患者。干预措施由营养师远程提供,并在线收集数据(病史和饮食史、COVID-19 感染和疫苗接种、身体成分、低血糖病史/症状、血压、生活质量、社会人口学数据)。参与者自行选择他们最希望通过干预改善的主要低血糖症状:英格兰(64%)和苏格兰(30%)的参与者(n=234)主要为女性(85%)、白人(90%),其中 13% 生活在 20% 的最贫困地区,平均年龄为 46(SD10)岁,体重指数中位数为 35kg/m 2 (IQR 32-40)。在开始研究前,30%的人报告感染过一次以上的 COVID-19(82%的人经一次或多次阳性检测证实)。LC 主要由全科医生(71%)、其他医护人员(9%)或自我诊断(21%)确诊。症状总数的中位数为 6(IQR 4-8)。自选的主要 LC 症状包括疲劳(54%)、呼吸困难(16%)、疼痛(12%)、焦虑/抑郁(1%)和 "其他"(17%)。基线时,82%的人正在服药,57%的人报告有 1 种以上其他病症。生活质量很差;20%的人长期请病假或减少工作时间。大多数人(92%)表示,自从感染 COVID-19 后体重增加了(体重变化中位数为 +11.5千克,范围为 -11.5 至 +45.3千克):结论:与低体重和超重有关的症状多种多样且错综复杂。远程试验的实施使英国各地的招募工作得以迅速展开,但某些群体(如男性和少数民族群体)的代表性不足:ISRCTN注册(ISRCTN12595520,2021年11月25日)。
{"title":"Baseline Characteristics in the Remote Diet Intervention to REduce long-COVID Symptoms Trial (ReDIRECT).","authors":"Laura Haag, Janice Richardson, Caroline Haig, Yvonne Cunningham, Heather Fraser, Naomi Brosnahan, Tracy Ibbotson, Jane Ormerod, Chris White, Emma McIntosh, Kate O'Donnell, Naveed Sattar, Alex McConnachie, Mike Lean, David Blane, Emilie Combet","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13522.1","DOIUrl":"10.3310/nihropenres.13522.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The persistence of symptoms for ≥12 weeks after a COVID-19 infection is known as Long COVID (LC), a condition with unclear pathophysiology and no proven treatments to date. Living with obesity is a risk factor for LC and has symptoms which may overlap with and aggravate LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ReDIRECT is a remotely delivered trial assessing whether weight management can reduce LC symptoms. We recruited people with LC and BMI >27kg/m <sup>2</sup>. The intervention was delivered remotely by dietitians, with online data collection (medical and dietary history, COVID-19 infection and vaccination, body composition, LC history/symptoms, blood pressure, quality of life, sociodemographic data). Participants self-selected the dominant LC symptoms they most wanted to improve from the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n=234) in England (64%) and Scotland (30%) were mainly women (85%) of white ethnicity (90%), with 13% living in the 20% most deprived areas, a mean age of 46 (SD10) years, and median BMI of 35kg/m <sup>2</sup> (IQR 32-40). Before starting the study, 30% reported more than one COVID-19 infection (82% confirmed with one or more positive tests). LC Diagnosis was mainly by GPs (71%), other healthcare professionals (9%), or self-diagnosed (21%). The median total number of symptoms was 6 (IQR 4-8). Self-selected dominant LC symptoms included fatigue (54%), breathlessness (16%), pain (12%), anxiety/depression (1%) and \"other\" (17%). At baseline, 82% were taking medication, 57% reported 1+ other medical conditions. Quality of life was poor; 20% were on long-term sick leave or reduced working hours. Most (92%) reported having gained weight since contracting COVID-19 (median weight change +11.5 kg, range -11.5 to +45.3 kg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Symptoms linked to LC and overweight are diverse and complex. Remote trial delivery enabled rapid recruitment across the UK yet certain groups (e.g. men and those from ethnic minority groups) were under-represented.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN12595520, 25/11/2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141984138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Managing hypertension in rural Gambia and Kenya: Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences of patients, health care workers, and decision-makers 冈比亚和肯尼亚农村地区的高血压管理:探索患者、医护人员和决策者经验的定性研究规程
Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13523.1
Brahima A. Diallo, Syreen Hassan, N. Kagwanja, R. Oyando, Jainaba Badjie, N. Mumba, Andrew M Prentice, Pablo Perel, Anthony O. Etyang, Ellen Nolte, Benjamin Tsofa
Background Hypertension is the single leading risk factor for premature death in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Prevalence is high, but awareness, treatment, and control are low. Community-centred interventions show promise for effective hypertension management, but embedding sustainably such interventions requires a good understanding of the wider context within which they are being introduced. This study aims to conduct a systematic health system assessment exploring the micro (patients/carers), meso (health care workers and facilities), and macro (broader system) contexts in rural Gambia and Kenya. Methods This study will utilise various qualitative approaches. We will conduct focus group discussions with hypertensive patients to map a ‘typical’ patient journey through health systems. We will conduct in-depth interviews with patients, health care workers, and decision-makers to explore their experiences of managing hypertension and assess the capacity and readiness of the health systems to strengthen hypertension management in rural Gambia and Kenya. We will also review national guidelines and policy documents to map the organisation of services and guidance on hypertension diagnosis and control. Thematic analysis approach will be used to analyse data, guided by the cumulative complexity model, and theories of organisational readiness and dissemination of innovations. Expected findings This study will describe the current context for the diagnosis and management of hypertension from the perspective of those involved in seeking (patients), delivering (health care workers) and overseeing (decision-makers) health services in rural Gambia and Kenya. It will juxtapose what should be happening according to health system guidance and what is happening in practice. It will outline the various barriers to and facilitators of hypertension control, as perceived by patients, providers, and decision-makers, and the conditions that would need to be in place for effective and sustainable implementation of a community-centred intervention to improve the diagnosis and management of hypertension in rural settings.
背景 在撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA),高血压是导致过早死亡的唯一主要风险因素。患病率很高,但认识、治疗和控制率却很低。以社区为中心的干预措施显示出有效管理高血压的前景,但要可持续地嵌入此类干预措施,就必须充分了解引入干预措施的大背景。本研究旨在对冈比亚和肯尼亚农村地区的微观(患者/护理人员)、中观(医护人员和医疗机构)和宏观(更广泛的系统)环境进行系统的医疗系统评估。方法 本研究将采用多种定性方法。我们将与高血压患者进行焦点小组讨论,描绘出患者在医疗系统中的 "典型 "历程。我们将对患者、医护人员和决策者进行深入访谈,探讨他们管理高血压的经验,并评估卫生系统在冈比亚和肯尼亚农村地区加强高血压管理的能力和准备情况。我们还将审查国家指导方针和政策文件,以绘制高血压诊断和控制的服务组织和指导图。在累积复杂性模型以及组织准备和创新传播理论的指导下,我们将采用专题分析方法对数据进行分析。预期结果 本研究将从冈比亚和肯尼亚农村地区参与寻求(患者)、提供(医护人员)和监督(决策者)医疗服务的人员的角度,描述高血压诊断和管理的现状。它将把根据卫生系统指南应该发生的事情与实际发生的事情并列起来。它将概述患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者所认为的高血压控制的各种障碍和促进因素,以及有效和可持续地实施以社区为中心的干预措施以改善农村地区高血压诊断和管理所需的条件。
{"title":"Managing hypertension in rural Gambia and Kenya: Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences of patients, health care workers, and decision-makers","authors":"Brahima A. Diallo, Syreen Hassan, N. Kagwanja, R. Oyando, Jainaba Badjie, N. Mumba, Andrew M Prentice, Pablo Perel, Anthony O. Etyang, Ellen Nolte, Benjamin Tsofa","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13523.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13523.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Hypertension is the single leading risk factor for premature death in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Prevalence is high, but awareness, treatment, and control are low. Community-centred interventions show promise for effective hypertension management, but embedding sustainably such interventions requires a good understanding of the wider context within which they are being introduced. This study aims to conduct a systematic health system assessment exploring the micro (patients/carers), meso (health care workers and facilities), and macro (broader system) contexts in rural Gambia and Kenya. Methods This study will utilise various qualitative approaches. We will conduct focus group discussions with hypertensive patients to map a ‘typical’ patient journey through health systems. We will conduct in-depth interviews with patients, health care workers, and decision-makers to explore their experiences of managing hypertension and assess the capacity and readiness of the health systems to strengthen hypertension management in rural Gambia and Kenya. We will also review national guidelines and policy documents to map the organisation of services and guidance on hypertension diagnosis and control. Thematic analysis approach will be used to analyse data, guided by the cumulative complexity model, and theories of organisational readiness and dissemination of innovations. Expected findings This study will describe the current context for the diagnosis and management of hypertension from the perspective of those involved in seeking (patients), delivering (health care workers) and overseeing (decision-makers) health services in rural Gambia and Kenya. It will juxtapose what should be happening according to health system guidance and what is happening in practice. It will outline the various barriers to and facilitators of hypertension control, as perceived by patients, providers, and decision-makers, and the conditions that would need to be in place for effective and sustainable implementation of a community-centred intervention to improve the diagnosis and management of hypertension in rural settings.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"42 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139961643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protocol for VIVALDI social care: Pilot study to reduce infections, outbreaks and antimicrobial resistance in care homes for older adults. VIVALDI 社会护理协议:减少老年人护理院感染、爆发和抗菌药耐药性的试点研究。
Pub Date : 2024-02-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13530.1
Maria Krutikov, Zoe Fry, Borscha Azmi, Charlotte Lezard, Katie Thorn, Gareth Patefield, Graeme Childe, John Hudson, Oliver Stirrup, Arnoupe Jhass, Nicola Turner, Jackie Cassell, Paul Flowers, Andrew Hayward, Andrew Copas, Martin Green, Laura Shallcross

Care home residents are vulnerable to severe outcomes from infections such as COVID-19 and influenza. However, measures to control outbreaks, such as care home closures to visitors and new admissions, have a detrimental impact on their quality of life. Many infections and outbreaks could be prevented but the first step is to measure them reliably. This is challenging in care homes due to the lack of data and research infrastructure. During the pandemic, the VIVALDI study measured COVID-19 infections in residents and staff by partnering with care providers and using routinely collected data. This study aims to establish sentinel surveillance and a research database to enable observational and future interventional studies in care homes. The project has been co-produced with care providers, staff, residents, relatives, and researchers. The study (October 2023 to March 2025) will explore the feasibility of establishing a network of 500-1500 care homes for older adults in England that is underpinned by a linked data platform. No data will be collected from staff. The cohort will be created by regularly extracting resident identifiers from Digital Social Care Records (DSCR), followed by pseudonymisation and linkage to routinely collected datasets. Following extensive consultation, we decided not to seek informed consent from residents for data collection, but they can 'opt out' of the study. Our goal is to be inclusive, and it is challenging to give every resident the opportunity to 'opt in' due to cognitive impairment and the requirement for consultees. The project, and all requests to use the data will be overseen by relatives, residents, staff, and care providers. The study has been approved by the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (23/CAG/0134&0135) and the South-West Frenchay Research Ethics Committee (23/SW/0105). It is funded by the UK Health Security Agency.

护理院居民很容易受到 COVID-19 和流感等感染的严重影响。然而,控制疫情爆发的措施(如关闭护理院,禁止访客和新入住者进入)会对他们的生活质量产生不利影响。许多感染和疫情爆发是可以预防的,但第一步是对其进行可靠的测量。由于缺乏数据和研究基础设施,这在护理院中具有挑战性。在大流行期间,VIVALDI 研究通过与护理提供者合作并利用日常收集的数据,测量了居民和员工的 COVID-19 感染情况。该研究旨在建立哨点监测和研究数据库,以便在护理院开展观察研究和未来的干预研究。该项目由护理机构、员工、居民、亲属和研究人员共同参与。该研究(2023 年 10 月至 2025 年 3 月)将探讨在英格兰建立一个由 500-1500 家老年人护理院组成的网络的可行性,该网络以一个链接数据平台为基础。不会从员工那里收集数据。我们将定期从数字社会护理记录 (DSCR) 中提取住户标识符,然后进行化名处理,并与日常收集的数据集进行链接,从而建立队列。经过广泛咨询,我们决定不征求居民对数据收集的知情同意,但他们可以 "退出 "研究。我们的目标是实现包容性,但由于认知障碍和对咨询者的要求,让每位居民都有机会 "选择加入 "是一项挑战。该项目以及所有使用数据的请求都将由亲属、居民、员工和护理服务提供者进行监督。该研究已获得健康研究管理局保密咨询小组(23/CAG/0134&0135)和西南法国研究伦理委员会(23/SW/0105)的批准。该研究由英国卫生安全局资助。
{"title":"Protocol for VIVALDI social care: Pilot study to reduce infections, outbreaks and antimicrobial resistance in care homes for older adults.","authors":"Maria Krutikov, Zoe Fry, Borscha Azmi, Charlotte Lezard, Katie Thorn, Gareth Patefield, Graeme Childe, John Hudson, Oliver Stirrup, Arnoupe Jhass, Nicola Turner, Jackie Cassell, Paul Flowers, Andrew Hayward, Andrew Copas, Martin Green, Laura Shallcross","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13530.1","DOIUrl":"10.3310/nihropenres.13530.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Care home residents are vulnerable to severe outcomes from infections such as COVID-19 and influenza. However, measures to control outbreaks, such as care home closures to visitors and new admissions, have a detrimental impact on their quality of life. Many infections and outbreaks could be prevented but the first step is to measure them reliably. This is challenging in care homes due to the lack of data and research infrastructure. During the pandemic, the VIVALDI study measured COVID-19 infections in residents and staff by partnering with care providers and using routinely collected data. This study aims to establish sentinel surveillance and a research database to enable observational and future interventional studies in care homes. The project has been co-produced with care providers, staff, residents, relatives, and researchers. The study (October 2023 to March 2025) will explore the feasibility of establishing a network of 500-1500 care homes for older adults in England that is underpinned by a linked data platform. No data will be collected from staff. The cohort will be created by regularly extracting resident identifiers from Digital Social Care Records (DSCR), followed by pseudonymisation and linkage to routinely collected datasets. Following extensive consultation, we decided not to seek informed consent from residents for data collection, but they can 'opt out' of the study. Our goal is to be inclusive, and it is challenging to give every resident the opportunity to 'opt in' due to cognitive impairment and the requirement for consultees. The project, and all requests to use the data will be overseen by relatives, residents, staff, and care providers. The study has been approved by the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (23/CAG/0134&0135) and the South-West Frenchay Research Ethics Committee (23/SW/0105). It is funded by the UK Health Security Agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141984142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A grumbling concern: A survey of gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis in the modulator era 怨声载道的担忧:调节剂时代囊性纤维化患者胃肠道症状调查
Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13384.2
Rebecca J Calthorpe, Natalie Goodchild, Vigilius Gleetus, Vinishaa Premakumar, B. Hayee, Zoe Elliott, Bethinn Evans, N. Rowbotham, S. Carr, Helen Barr, Alexander Horsley, Daniel Peckham, Alan R Smyth
Background Gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and intrusive to daily life. Relieving gastrointestinal symptoms was identified as an important research priority and previously explored in an international survey in 2018. However, following the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators in 2019, the landscape of CF treatment has changed. We repeated an online survey to further describe gastrointestinal symptoms and their effect on quality of life (QoL) in the CFTR modulator era. Methods An electronic survey consisting of closed questions and free text responses was distributed via social media and professional networks for a period of one month between March - April 2022. People with CF (pwCF), their family and friends, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were invited to take part. Results There were 164 respondents: 88 pwCF (54%), 22 (13%) family, and 54 (33%) healthcare professionals (HCPs). A total of 89/110 (81%) pwCF or family members reported CFTR modulator treatment. The most commonly reported symptoms were wind / gas and rumbling stomach noises (borborygmi) in both the modulator and non-modulator groups in addition to loose motions (modulator group) and bloating (no modulator group). Abdominal pain and bloating had the greatest impact on QoL. For those on a CFTR modulator, the proportion of pwCF reporting “no change” or “worse” for all of the symptoms surveyed was greater than the proportion reporting an improvement. For some symptoms such as stomach pains and reduced appetite, improvements were perceived more commonly in HCPs than what was reported by pwCF. Following modulator introduction, dietary changes to manage GI symptoms were recommended by 28/35 (80%) of HCPs and reported by 38/76 (50%) lay respondents. Changes in medication were recommended by 19/35 (54%) HCPs and reported by 44/76 (58%) of patients and family members. Conclusion This survey has shown that gastrointestinal symptoms remain prevalent in pwCF in the CFTR modulator era, though the nature of these symptoms may have changed. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of these symptoms is essential. Future clinical studies should focus on improving symptoms and QoL.
背景 囊性纤维化(CF)患者的胃肠道症状很常见,对日常生活造成干扰。缓解胃肠道症状被确定为一项重要的研究重点,此前曾在 2018 年的一项国际调查中进行过探讨。然而,随着囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节剂(CFTR)调节剂在2019年的广泛应用,CF治疗的格局发生了变化。我们重复进行了一项在线调查,以进一步描述 CFTR 调节剂时代的胃肠道症状及其对生活质量(QoL)的影响。方法 在 2022 年 3 月至 4 月的一个月时间里,我们通过社交媒体和专业网络发布了一项由封闭式问题和自由文本回复组成的电子调查。邀请 CF 患者 (pwCF)、其家人和朋友以及医疗保健专业人员 (HCP) 参与调查。结果 共有 164 位受访者:88 名 CF 患者(占 54%)、22 名家属(占 13%)和 54 名医护人员(占 33%)。共有 89/110 名(81%)患者或其家人表示接受过 CFTR 调节剂治疗。在调制剂组和非调制剂组中,最常报告的症状是胃风/胃气和咕噜咕噜声(borborygmi),此外还有肠蠕动松弛(调制剂组)和腹胀(非调制剂组)。腹痛和腹胀对 QoL 的影响最大。对于使用 CFTR 调节剂的患者,报告所有症状 "无变化 "或 "恶化 "的比例高于报告症状改善的比例。对于某些症状,如胃痛和食欲减退,保健医生认为症状有所改善的比例高于患者。在使用调节剂后,28/35(80%)的保健医生建议改变饮食以控制消化道症状,38/76(50%)的非专业受访者报告了这种情况。19/35(54%)名保健医生建议改变用药,44/76(58%)名患者和家属报告了改变用药。结论 本次调查表明,在 CFTR 调节剂时代,胃肠道症状在 pwCF 中仍然普遍存在,尽管这些症状的性质可能已经发生了变化。更好地了解这些症状的潜在病理生理学至关重要。未来的临床研究应侧重于改善症状和 QoL。
{"title":"A grumbling concern: A survey of gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis in the modulator era","authors":"Rebecca J Calthorpe, Natalie Goodchild, Vigilius Gleetus, Vinishaa Premakumar, B. Hayee, Zoe Elliott, Bethinn Evans, N. Rowbotham, S. Carr, Helen Barr, Alexander Horsley, Daniel Peckham, Alan R Smyth","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13384.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13384.2","url":null,"abstract":"Background Gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and intrusive to daily life. Relieving gastrointestinal symptoms was identified as an important research priority and previously explored in an international survey in 2018. However, following the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators in 2019, the landscape of CF treatment has changed. We repeated an online survey to further describe gastrointestinal symptoms and their effect on quality of life (QoL) in the CFTR modulator era. Methods An electronic survey consisting of closed questions and free text responses was distributed via social media and professional networks for a period of one month between March - April 2022. People with CF (pwCF), their family and friends, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were invited to take part. Results There were 164 respondents: 88 pwCF (54%), 22 (13%) family, and 54 (33%) healthcare professionals (HCPs). A total of 89/110 (81%) pwCF or family members reported CFTR modulator treatment. The most commonly reported symptoms were wind / gas and rumbling stomach noises (borborygmi) in both the modulator and non-modulator groups in addition to loose motions (modulator group) and bloating (no modulator group). Abdominal pain and bloating had the greatest impact on QoL. For those on a CFTR modulator, the proportion of pwCF reporting “no change” or “worse” for all of the symptoms surveyed was greater than the proportion reporting an improvement. For some symptoms such as stomach pains and reduced appetite, improvements were perceived more commonly in HCPs than what was reported by pwCF. Following modulator introduction, dietary changes to manage GI symptoms were recommended by 28/35 (80%) of HCPs and reported by 38/76 (50%) lay respondents. Changes in medication were recommended by 19/35 (54%) HCPs and reported by 44/76 (58%) of patients and family members. Conclusion This survey has shown that gastrointestinal symptoms remain prevalent in pwCF in the CFTR modulator era, though the nature of these symptoms may have changed. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of these symptoms is essential. Future clinical studies should focus on improving symptoms and QoL.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139804569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A grumbling concern: A survey of gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis in the modulator era. 抱怨的担忧:调制器时代囊性纤维化胃肠道症状的国际调查
Pub Date : 2024-02-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13384.1
Rebecca J Calthorpe, Natalie Goodchild, Vigilius Gleetus, Vinishaa Premakumar, Bu Hayee, Zoe Elliott, Bethinn Evans, Nicola J Rowbotham, Siobhán B Carr, Helen Barr, Alexander Horsley, Daniel Peckham, Alan R Smyth

Background: Gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and intrusive to daily life. Relieving gastrointestinal symptoms was identified as an important research priority and previously explored in an international survey in 2018. However, following the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators in 2019, the landscape of CF treatment has changed. We repeated an online survey to further describe gastrointestinal symptoms and their effect on quality of life (QoL) in the CFTR modulator era.

Methods: An electronic survey consisting of closed questions and free text responses was distributed via social media and professional networks for a period of one month between March - April 2022. People with CF (pwCF), their family and friends, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were invited to take part.

Results: There were 164 respondents: 88 pwCF (54%), 22 (13%) family, and 54 (33%) healthcare professionals (HCPs). A total of 89/110 (81%) pwCF or family members reported CFTR modulator treatment. The most commonly reported symptoms were wind / gas and rumbling stomach noises (borborygmi) in both the modulator and non-modulator groups in addition to loose motions (modulator group) and bloating (no modulator group). Abdominal pain and bloating had the greatest impact on QoL.For those on a CFTR modulator, the proportion of pwCF reporting "no change" or "worse" for all of the symptoms surveyed was greater than the proportion reporting an improvement. For some symptoms such as stomach pains and reduced appetite, improvements were perceived more commonly in HCPs than what was reported by pwCF. Following modulator introduction, dietary changes to manage GI symptoms were recommended by 28/35 (80%) of HCPs and reported by 38/76 (50%) lay respondents. Changes in medication were recommended by 19/35 (54%) HCPs and reported by 44/76 (58%) of patients and family members.

Conclusion: This survey has shown that gastrointestinal symptoms remain prevalent in pwCF in the CFTR modulator era, though the nature of these symptoms may have changed. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of these symptoms is essential. Future clinical studies should focus on improving symptoms and QoL.

背景:囊性纤维化(CF)的胃肠道症状是常见的,并干扰日常生活。缓解胃肠道症状被确定为一项重要的研究重点,此前曾在2018年的一项国际调查中进行过探索。然而,随着2019年囊性纤维化跨膜电导调节剂(CFTR)的广泛引入,CF治疗的前景发生了变化。我们重复了一项在线调查,以进一步描述CFTR调节剂时代的胃肠道症状及其对生活质量(QoL)的影响。方法:在2022年3月至4月期间,通过社交媒体和专业网络发布了一项为期一个月的电子调查,包括封闭式问题和免费文本回复。CF患者(pwCF)、他们的家人和朋友以及医疗保健专业人员(HCP)被邀请参加。结果:共有164名受访者:88名pwCF(54%)、22名家庭(13%)和54名医疗保健专业人员(HCP)。共有89/110例(81%)pwCF或家族成员报告了CFTR调节剂治疗。最常见的症状是风/气、隆隆的胃部噪音、松散的运动(调节剂)和腹胀(无调节剂)。腹痛和腹胀对生活质量的影响最大。对于那些使用CFTR调节剂的人,pwCF报告所有调查症状“没有变化”或“更糟”的比例大于报告改善的比例。在引入调节剂后,28/35(80%)的HCP建议改变饮食,38/76(50%)的非专业受访者报告了饮食变化。19/35(54%)的HCP建议改变药物,44/76(58%)的患者和家庭成员报告了药物变化。结论这项调查表明,在CFTR调节剂时代,pwCF的胃肠道症状仍然普遍存在,尽管这些症状的性质可能已经改变。更好地了解这些症状的潜在病理生理学是至关重要的。未来的临床研究应侧重于改善症状和生活质量。
{"title":"A grumbling concern: A survey of gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis in the modulator era.","authors":"Rebecca J Calthorpe, Natalie Goodchild, Vigilius Gleetus, Vinishaa Premakumar, Bu Hayee, Zoe Elliott, Bethinn Evans, Nicola J Rowbotham, Siobhán B Carr, Helen Barr, Alexander Horsley, Daniel Peckham, Alan R Smyth","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13384.1","DOIUrl":"10.3310/nihropenres.13384.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and intrusive to daily life. Relieving gastrointestinal symptoms was identified as an important research priority and previously explored in an international survey in 2018. However, following the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators in 2019, the landscape of CF treatment has changed. We repeated an online survey to further describe gastrointestinal symptoms and their effect on quality of life (QoL) in the CFTR modulator era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey consisting of closed questions and free text responses was distributed via social media and professional networks for a period of one month between March - April 2022. People with CF (pwCF), their family and friends, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were invited to take part.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 164 respondents: 88 pwCF (54%), 22 (13%) family, and 54 (33%) healthcare professionals (HCPs). A total of 89/110 (81%) pwCF or family members reported CFTR modulator treatment. The most commonly reported symptoms were wind / gas and rumbling stomach noises (borborygmi) in both the modulator and non-modulator groups in addition to loose motions (modulator group) and bloating (no modulator group). Abdominal pain and bloating had the greatest impact on QoL.For those on a CFTR modulator, the proportion of pwCF reporting \"no change\" or \"worse\" for all of the symptoms surveyed was greater than the proportion reporting an improvement. For some symptoms such as stomach pains and reduced appetite, improvements were perceived more commonly in HCPs than what was reported by pwCF. Following modulator introduction, dietary changes to manage GI symptoms were recommended by 28/35 (80%) of HCPs and reported by 38/76 (50%) lay respondents. Changes in medication were recommended by 19/35 (54%) HCPs and reported by 44/76 (58%) of patients and family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey has shown that gastrointestinal symptoms remain prevalent in pwCF in the CFTR modulator era, though the nature of these symptoms may have changed. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of these symptoms is essential. Future clinical studies should focus on improving symptoms and QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":" ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593346/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48866085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
NIHR open research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1