Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000262
Joey P Johnson, Jaimo Ahn, Douglas R Dirschl, John J Wixted, Andrew R Evans
Orthopaedics as a field and a profession is fundamentally concerned with the treatment of musculoskeletal disease, in all of its many forms. Our collective understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal pathology resulting from injury continues to evolve, opening novel opportunities to develop orthobiologic treatments to improve care. It is a long path to move from an understanding of cellular pathology to development of successful clinical treatment, and this article proposes to discuss some of the challenges to achieving translational therapies in orthopaedics. The article will focus on challenges that clinicians will likely face in seeking to bring promising treatments forward to clinical practice and strategies for improving success in translational efforts.
{"title":"Fracture healing-orthobiologics: from basic science to clinical application.","authors":"Joey P Johnson, Jaimo Ahn, Douglas R Dirschl, John J Wixted, Andrew R Evans","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthopaedics as a field and a profession is fundamentally concerned with the treatment of musculoskeletal disease, in all of its many forms. Our collective understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal pathology resulting from injury continues to evolve, opening novel opportunities to develop orthobiologic treatments to improve care. It is a long path to move from an understanding of cellular pathology to development of successful clinical treatment, and this article proposes to discuss some of the challenges to achieving translational therapies in orthopaedics. The article will focus on challenges that clinicians will likely face in seeking to bring promising treatments forward to clinical practice and strategies for improving success in translational efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2 Suppl","pages":"e262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/4b/oi9-6-e262.PMC10166332.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9446068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000256
Matthew D Putnam, Andrew Rau, Michael Frohbergh, Kevin Ong, Michael Bushelow, Michael Blauth
Femoral neck fracture displacement with subsequent vascular disruption is one of the factors that contribute to trauma-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Iatrogenic damage of the intraosseous arterial system during fixation of femoral neck fracture is another possible cause of avascular necrosis that is less well understood. Recently, Zhao et al (2017) reconstructed 3D structures of intraosseous blood supply and identified the epiphyseal and inferior retinacular arterial system to be important structures for maintaining the femoral head blood supply after femoral neck fracture. The authors therefore recommended placing implants centrally to reduce iatrogenic vascular injuries. Our in vitro study compared the spatial footprint of a traditional dynamic hip screw with an antirotation screw versus a newly developed hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw on intraosseous vasculature.
Methods: Three dimensional (3D) µCT angiograms of 9 cadaveric proximal femora were produced. Three segmented volumes-porous or cancellous bone, filled or cortical bone, and intraosseous vasculature-were converted to surface files. 3D in silico models of the fixation systems were sized and implanted in silico without visibility of the vascular maps. The volume of vasculature that overlapped with the devices was determined. The ratio of the vascular intersection to the comparator device was calculated, and the mean ratio was determined. A paired design, noninferiority test was used to compare the devices.
Results: Results indicate both significant (P < 0.001) superiority and noninferiority of the hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw when compared with a dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw for the volume of vasculature that overlapped with each device in the femoral neck.
Conclusions: Combining established methods of vascular visualization with newer methods enables an implant's impact on vascular intersection to be assessed in silico. This methodology suggests that when used for femoral neck fracture management, the new device intersects fewer blood vessels than the comparator. Comparative clinical studies are needed to investigate whether these findings correlate with the incidence of avascular necrosis and clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Comparing the volume of vascular intersection of two femoral neck fracture fixation implants using an <i>In silico</i> technique.","authors":"Matthew D Putnam, Andrew Rau, Michael Frohbergh, Kevin Ong, Michael Bushelow, Michael Blauth","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Femoral neck fracture displacement with subsequent vascular disruption is one of the factors that contribute to trauma-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Iatrogenic damage of the intraosseous arterial system during fixation of femoral neck fracture is another possible cause of avascular necrosis that is less well understood. Recently, Zhao et al (2017) reconstructed 3D structures of intraosseous blood supply and identified the epiphyseal and inferior retinacular arterial system to be important structures for maintaining the femoral head blood supply after femoral neck fracture. The authors therefore recommended placing implants centrally to reduce iatrogenic vascular injuries. Our in vitro study compared the spatial footprint of a traditional dynamic hip screw with an antirotation screw versus a newly developed hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw on intraosseous vasculature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three dimensional (3D) µCT angiograms of 9 cadaveric proximal femora were produced. Three segmented volumes-porous or cancellous bone, filled or cortical bone, and intraosseous vasculature-were converted to surface files. 3D in silico models of the fixation systems were sized and implanted in silico without visibility of the vascular maps. The volume of vasculature that overlapped with the devices was determined. The ratio of the vascular intersection to the comparator device was calculated, and the mean ratio was determined. A paired design, noninferiority test was used to compare the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate both significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001) superiority and noninferiority of the hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw when compared with a dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw for the volume of vasculature that overlapped with each device in the femoral neck.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining established methods of vascular visualization with newer methods enables an implant's impact on vascular intersection to be assessed in silico. This methodology suggests that when used for femoral neck fracture management, the new device intersects fewer blood vessels than the comparator. Comparative clinical studies are needed to investigate whether these findings correlate with the incidence of avascular necrosis and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2 Suppl","pages":"e256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/50/oi9-6-e256.PMC10166339.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9452807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000248
Loren O Black, Megan Rushkin, Karalynn Lancaster, J Samuel Cheesman, James E Meeker, Jung U Yoo, Darin M Friess, Zachary M Working
Many investigations have evaluated local and systemic consequences of intramedullary (IM) reaming and suggest that reaming may cause, or exacerbate, injury to the soft tissues adjacent to fractures. To date, no study has examined the effect on local muscular physiology as measured by intramuscular pH (IpH). Here, we observe in vivo IpH during IM reaming for tibia fractures.
Methods: Adults with acute tibia shaft fractures (level 1, academic, 2019-2021) were offered enrollment in an observational cohort. During IM nailing, a sterile, validated IpH probe was placed into the anterior tibialis (<5 cm from fracture, continuous sampling, independent research team). IpH before, during, and after reaming was averaged and compared through repeated measures ANOVA. As the appropriate period to analyze IpH during reaming is unknown, the analysis was repeated over periods of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes prereaming and postreaming time intervals.
Results: Sixteen subjects with tibia shaft fractures were observed during nailing. Average time from injury to surgery was 35.0 hours (SD, 31.8). Starting and ending perioperative IpH was acidic, averaging 6.64 (SD, 0.21) and 6.74 (SD, 0.17), respectively. Average reaming time lasted 15 minutes. Average IpH during reaming was 6.73 (SD, 0.15). There was no difference in IpH between prereaming, intrareaming, and postreaming periods. IpH did not differ regardless of analysis over short or long time domains compared with the duration of reaming.
Conclusions: Reaming does not affect IpH. Both granular and broad time domains were tested, revealing no observable local impact.
{"title":"Reaming the intramedullary canal during tibial nailing does not affect in vivo intramuscular pH of the anterior tibialis.","authors":"Loren O Black, Megan Rushkin, Karalynn Lancaster, J Samuel Cheesman, James E Meeker, Jung U Yoo, Darin M Friess, Zachary M Working","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many investigations have evaluated local and systemic consequences of intramedullary (IM) reaming and suggest that reaming may cause, or exacerbate, injury to the soft tissues adjacent to fractures. To date, no study has examined the effect on local muscular physiology as measured by intramuscular pH (IpH). Here, we observe in vivo IpH during IM reaming for tibia fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with acute tibia shaft fractures (level 1, academic, 2019-2021) were offered enrollment in an observational cohort. During IM nailing, a sterile, validated IpH probe was placed into the anterior tibialis (<5 cm from fracture, continuous sampling, independent research team). IpH before, during, and after reaming was averaged and compared through repeated measures ANOVA. As the appropriate period to analyze IpH during reaming is unknown, the analysis was repeated over periods of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes prereaming and postreaming time intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen subjects with tibia shaft fractures were observed during nailing. Average time from injury to surgery was 35.0 hours (SD, 31.8). Starting and ending perioperative IpH was acidic, averaging 6.64 (SD, 0.21) and 6.74 (SD, 0.17), respectively. Average reaming time lasted 15 minutes. Average IpH during reaming was 6.73 (SD, 0.15). There was no difference in IpH between prereaming, intrareaming, and postreaming periods. IpH did not differ regardless of analysis over short or long time domains compared with the duration of reaming.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reaming does not affect IpH. Both granular and broad time domains were tested, revealing no observable local impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2 Suppl","pages":"e248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/65/oi9-6-e248.PMC10166333.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9446069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000232
Justin M Haller, Marjolein C H van der Meulen, Steven Olson, Donald Anderson, J Lawrence Marsh, Zachary Working
Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) is a subset of osteoarthritis that occurs after joint injury and is associated with degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. As compared with primary osteoarthritis, PTOA occurs in a time window initiated by a traumatic event resulting in damage to layers of joint structure and alterations in joint shape. As techniques in open reduction and internal fixation continue to mature, our success in preventing posttraumatic osteoarthritis has not kept pace. Advances in research in the subchondral bone, inflammatory response, and joint mechanics continue to open our understanding of this posttraumatic process. In addition, there are possibilities emerging as biological agents to therapeutically alter the progression of PTOA.
{"title":"Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: from basic science to clinical implications.","authors":"Justin M Haller, Marjolein C H van der Meulen, Steven Olson, Donald Anderson, J Lawrence Marsh, Zachary Working","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) is a subset of osteoarthritis that occurs after joint injury and is associated with degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. As compared with primary osteoarthritis, PTOA occurs in a time window initiated by a traumatic event resulting in damage to layers of joint structure and alterations in joint shape. As techniques in open reduction and internal fixation continue to mature, our success in preventing posttraumatic osteoarthritis has not kept pace. Advances in research in the subchondral bone, inflammatory response, and joint mechanics continue to open our understanding of this posttraumatic process. In addition, there are possibilities emerging as biological agents to therapeutically alter the progression of PTOA.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2 Suppl","pages":"e232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/f1/oi9-6-e232.PMC10166366.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9452806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000239
Kelsey E Brown, Michael J Flores, Gerard Slobogean, David Shearer, Ida Leah Gitajn, Saam Morshed
Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to establishing causal relationships in clinical research. However, these studies are expensive and time consuming to conduct. This article aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons and clinical researchers with methodology to optimize inference and minimize bias in observational studies that are often much more feasible to undertake. To mitigate the risk of bias arising from their nonexperimental design, researchers must first understand the ways in which measured covariates can influence treatment, outcomes, and missingness of follow-up data. With knowledge of these relationships, researchers can then build causal diagrams to best understand how to control sources of bias. Some common techniques for controlling for bias include matching, regression, stratification, and propensity score analysis. Selection bias may result from loss to follow-up and missing data. Strategies such as multiple imputation and time-to-event analysis can be useful for handling missingness. For longitudinal data, repeated measures allow observational studies to best summarize the impact of the intervention over time. Clinical researchers familiar with fundamental concepts of causal inference and techniques reviewed in this article will have the power to improve the quality of inferences made from clinical research in orthopaedic trauma surgery.
{"title":"Simple design and analysis strategies for solving problems in observational orthopaedic clinical research.","authors":"Kelsey E Brown, Michael J Flores, Gerard Slobogean, David Shearer, Ida Leah Gitajn, Saam Morshed","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to establishing causal relationships in clinical research. However, these studies are expensive and time consuming to conduct. This article aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons and clinical researchers with methodology to optimize inference and minimize bias in observational studies that are often much more feasible to undertake. To mitigate the risk of bias arising from their nonexperimental design, researchers must first understand the ways in which measured covariates can influence treatment, outcomes, and missingness of follow-up data. With knowledge of these relationships, researchers can then build causal diagrams to best understand how to control sources of bias. Some common techniques for controlling for bias include matching, regression, stratification, and propensity score analysis. Selection bias may result from loss to follow-up and missing data. Strategies such as multiple imputation and time-to-event analysis can be useful for handling missingness. For longitudinal data, repeated measures allow observational studies to best summarize the impact of the intervention over time. Clinical researchers familiar with fundamental concepts of causal inference and techniques reviewed in this article will have the power to improve the quality of inferences made from clinical research in orthopaedic trauma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2 Suppl","pages":"e239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/a0/oi9-6-e239.PMC10166364.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9446067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000243
A. Nauth
{"title":"Basic Science Focus Forum supplement of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association 2022","authors":"A. Nauth","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47121407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-27eCollection Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000268
Billy T Haonga, Patrick Ngunyale, Ericka P von Kaeppler, Claire A Donnelley, Nae Y Won, Edmund N Eliezer, Kelsey Brown, Michael Flores, Jamieson M O'Marr, Patricia Rodarte, Mayur Urva, Abigail Cortez, Travis Porco, Saam Morshed, David W Shearer
Background: Open tibial fractures have a high risk of infection that can lead to severe morbidity. Antibiotics administered locally at the site of the open wound are a potentially effective preventive measure, but there are limited data evaluating aminoglycoside antibiotics. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of a clinical trial to test the efficacy of local gentamicin in reducing the risk of fracture-related infection after open tibial fracture.
Methods: This study is a single-center, pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute. Participants were randomized intraoperatively after wound closure to receive gentamicin solution or normal saline solution injected at the fracture site. Follow-ups were completed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of enrollment and retention. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of fracture-related infection.
Results: Of 199 patients screened, 100 eligible patients were successfully enrolled and randomized over 9 months (11.1 patients/month). Complete data were recorded at baseline and follow-up for >95% of cases. The rate of follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year were 70%, 68%, 69%, 61%, and 80%, respectively. There was no difference in adverse events or any of the measured primary and secondary outcomes.
Conclusion: This pilot study is among the first to evaluate locally administered gentamicin in open tibial fractures. Results indicate a rigorous clinical trial with acceptable rates of enrollment and follow-up to address this topic is possible in this setting.
{"title":"A pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate local gentamicin versus saline in open tibial fractures (pGO-Tibia).","authors":"Billy T Haonga, Patrick Ngunyale, Ericka P von Kaeppler, Claire A Donnelley, Nae Y Won, Edmund N Eliezer, Kelsey Brown, Michael Flores, Jamieson M O'Marr, Patricia Rodarte, Mayur Urva, Abigail Cortez, Travis Porco, Saam Morshed, David W Shearer","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000268","DOIUrl":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open tibial fractures have a high risk of infection that can lead to severe morbidity. Antibiotics administered locally at the site of the open wound are a potentially effective preventive measure, but there are limited data evaluating aminoglycoside antibiotics. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of a clinical trial to test the efficacy of local gentamicin in reducing the risk of fracture-related infection after open tibial fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a single-center, pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute. Participants were randomized intraoperatively after wound closure to receive gentamicin solution or normal saline solution injected at the fracture site. Follow-ups were completed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of enrollment and retention. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of fracture-related infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 199 patients screened, 100 eligible patients were successfully enrolled and randomized over 9 months (11.1 patients/month). Complete data were recorded at baseline and follow-up for >95% of cases. The rate of follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year were 70%, 68%, 69%, 61%, and 80%, respectively. There was no difference in adverse events or any of the measured primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study is among the first to evaluate locally administered gentamicin in open tibial fractures. Results indicate a rigorous clinical trial with acceptable rates of enrollment and follow-up to address this topic is possible in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/48/49/oi9-6-e268.PMC10503693.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10309156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-17eCollection Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000264
Ryan S Bailey, Benjamin A Nwadike, Thomas Revak
Background: Retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur is a popular treatment option for femoral shaft fractures. However, this requires accessing the intramedullary canal through the knee, posing a risk of intra-articular infection. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of intra-articular infection of the knee after retrograde nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
Methods: All patients who underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures between June 2004 and December 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Six months of follow-up or documented fracture union was required. Records were reviewed for documentation of septic arthritis of the ipsilateral knee during the follow-up period.
Results: A total of 294 fractures, including 217 closed and 77 open injuries, were included. Eighteen had an associated ipsilateral traumatic arthrotomy; 188 cases had an associated ipsilateral lower extremity fracture. No cases of septic arthritis were identified.
Conclusion: There were no cases of septic arthritis in 294 fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing. Retrograde nailing appears safe for risk of postoperative septic arthritis of the knee even in the face of open fractures and traumatic wounds.
{"title":"A retrospective review of the rate of septic knee arthritis after retrograde femoral nailing for traumatic femoral fractures at a single academic institution.","authors":"Ryan S Bailey, Benjamin A Nwadike, Thomas Revak","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000264","DOIUrl":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur is a popular treatment option for femoral shaft fractures. However, this requires accessing the intramedullary canal through the knee, posing a risk of intra-articular infection. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of intra-articular infection of the knee after retrograde nailing of femoral shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures between June 2004 and December 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Six months of follow-up or documented fracture union was required. Records were reviewed for documentation of septic arthritis of the ipsilateral knee during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294 fractures, including 217 closed and 77 open injuries, were included. Eighteen had an associated ipsilateral traumatic arthrotomy; 188 cases had an associated ipsilateral lower extremity fracture. No cases of septic arthritis were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no cases of septic arthritis in 294 fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing. Retrograde nailing appears safe for risk of postoperative septic arthritis of the knee even in the face of open fractures and traumatic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/d9/oi9-6-e264.PMC10538562.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41174284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-16eCollection Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000251
Simon Matthew Graham, Sithombo Maqungo, Maritz Laubscher, Nando Ferreira, Michael Held, William James Harrison, A Hamish Simpson, Peter MacPherson, David G Lalloo
Objective: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of the development of nonunion after a fracture. This prospective matched case-control study in South Africa investigated common risk factors, including HIV status, that influence the development of a nonunion after a femur or tibia fracture.
Methods: Adult participants (cases) with established nonunions of the femur or tibia shaft were recruited over a 16-month period, between December 2017 and April 2019. They were matched for (1) age; (2) sex; (3) fracture site; and (4) fracture management type, with "control" participants who progressed to fracture union within 6 months of injury. All participants were tested for HIV. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to investigate associations between known risk factors for the development of nonunion and impaired fracture healing.
Results: A total of 57 cases were matched with 57 "control" participants (44/57 male, 77.2% vs. 13/57 female, 22.8%, median age 36 years). HIV status was not associated with the development of nonunion after the management of tibia and femur fractures, on both univariate (odds ratio, 0.40; confidence interval, 0.10-1.32; P = 0.151) or multivariable (odds ratio, 0.86; confidence interval, 0.18-3.73; P = 0.831) analysis. No other confounding factors were shown to have any statistically significant impact on the odds of developing nonunion in this study cohort.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that HIV does not seem to increase the risk of the development of nonunion and HIV-positive individuals who sustain a fracture can be managed in the same manner as those who are HIV negative.
{"title":"Is human immunodeficiency virus a risk factor for the development of nonunion?-a case-control study.","authors":"Simon Matthew Graham, Sithombo Maqungo, Maritz Laubscher, Nando Ferreira, Michael Held, William James Harrison, A Hamish Simpson, Peter MacPherson, David G Lalloo","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000251","DOIUrl":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of the development of nonunion after a fracture. This prospective matched case-control study in South Africa investigated common risk factors, including HIV status, that influence the development of a nonunion after a femur or tibia fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult participants (cases) with established nonunions of the femur or tibia shaft were recruited over a 16-month period, between December 2017 and April 2019. They were matched for (1) age; (2) sex; (3) fracture site; and (4) fracture management type, with \"control\" participants who progressed to fracture union within 6 months of injury. All participants were tested for HIV. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to investigate associations between known risk factors for the development of nonunion and impaired fracture healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 cases were matched with 57 \"control\" participants (44/57 male, 77.2% vs. 13/57 female, 22.8%, median age 36 years). HIV status was not associated with the development of nonunion after the management of tibia and femur fractures, on both univariate (odds ratio, 0.40; confidence interval, 0.10-1.32; <i>P</i> = 0.151) or multivariable (odds ratio, 0.86; confidence interval, 0.18-3.73; <i>P</i> = 0.831) analysis. No other confounding factors were shown to have any statistically significant impact on the odds of developing nonunion in this study cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that HIV does not seem to increase the risk of the development of nonunion and HIV-positive individuals who sustain a fracture can be managed in the same manner as those who are HIV negative.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/3f/oi9-6-e251.PMC10538559.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41124866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-16eCollection Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000267
David Eric O'Neill, Bhavani Gannavarapu, Brian Hrycushko, Michael Folkert, Robert Timmerman, Alexandra Callan
Case: A 56-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma and femoral lesions with impending pathologic fracture was indicated for intramedullary brachytherapy (IMBT) and intramedullary nail.
Conclusions: IMBT + intramedullary nail is a new technique for the treatment of long bone metastases. IMBT maximizes radiation to the tumor and minimizes radiation to surrounding tissues. It allows the patient to resume systemic treatment expediently. Our cadaver model and patient were both treated for femoral metastases; however, this technique allows for the treatment of any long bone. This is a safe technique that minimizes treatment time compared with other standard radiation regimens.
{"title":"Intramedullary brachytherapy for the treatment of long bone metastatic disease: A case report.","authors":"David Eric O'Neill, Bhavani Gannavarapu, Brian Hrycushko, Michael Folkert, Robert Timmerman, Alexandra Callan","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Case: </strong>A 56-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma and femoral lesions with impending pathologic fracture was indicated for intramedullary brachytherapy (IMBT) and intramedullary nail.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMBT + intramedullary nail is a new technique for the treatment of long bone metastases. IMBT maximizes radiation to the tumor and minimizes radiation to surrounding tissues. It allows the patient to resume systemic treatment expediently. Our cadaver model and patient were both treated for femoral metastases; however, this technique allows for the treatment of any long bone. This is a safe technique that minimizes treatment time compared with other standard radiation regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/74/oi9-6-e267.PMC10538573.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41159914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}