Aerospace medicine and human performance最新文献

INTRODUCTION: Exploration beyond low Earth orbit requires innovative solutions to support the crew medically, especially as the opportunity for timely evacuation to Earth diminishes. This includes assessing the risks and benefits that a complicated medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) poses to the injured crewmember, the crew, and the mission. This qualitative study identifies common MEDEVAC risk assessment principles used in spaceflight and other extreme environments to better inform future risk assessment tools and exploration mission concepts.METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with subject matter experts in spaceflight and analog domains, including polar operations, undersea operations, combat medicine, and mountaineering. Transcripts were analyzed using the qualitative method of Thematic Analysis with the technique of consensus, co-occurrence, and comparison.RESULTS: Subject matter experts described 18 themes divided into two main categories: Primary Risk Considerations (e.g., crew, mission, resources, time) and Contributing Factors (e.g., psychological considerations, medical preparation, politics).DISCUSSION: Primary Risk Considerations can assess MEDEVAC risk across mission phases, with Contributing Factors acting as premission tools to adjust those risks. Inter- and intracategory connections identified medical support considerations, MEDEVAC support considerations, and philosophy as the most impactful Contributing Factors. Medical support considerations, psychological considerations, and political considerations were found to have unique aspects given the distances and societal impact of exploration vs. low Earth orbit spaceflight. The Contributing Factor theme of decision making was determined to be unique due to its impacts across both categories. These findings expand current considerations and are important inputs for exploration mission MEDEVAC Concepts of Operations.Almand A, Ko SY, Anderson A, Keller RJ, Zero M, Anderson AP, Laws JM, Lehnhardt K, Easter BD. A qualitative investigation of space exploration medical evacuation risks. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):875-886.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of denial or withdrawal of flying privileges for aircrew. Screening for CAD is therefore crucial. The present study analyzed German military aircrew with diagnosed CAD and/or acute coronary syndrome despite close medical monitoring with the intention to further optimize individual outcomes and aeromedical disposition.METHODS: The digital information systems of the German Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine were searched for pilots and nonpilot aircrew with CAD and/or myocardial infarction (MI). They were retrospectively analyzed for age at initial diagnosis, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors, diagnostic procedures, treatment, and aeromedical disposition.RESULTS: Between February 1987 and March 2023, 126 aircrew, 55% pilots and 45% nonpilot aircrew, were identified with CAD and/or MI. An accumulation of two to six risk factors was found in 77% of both groups. Most pilots (54%) received conservative treatment, 44% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, and 3% coronary artery bypass grafting. In the group of nonpilot aircrew, conservative treatment was performed in 47%, coronary intervention in 37%, and bypass grafting in 16%. A total of 45 pilots (65%) returned to flying duties, albeit 39 (57%) with restrictions. In the group of nonpilot aircrew, 31 (54%) returned to flying duties.DISCUSSION: A small group of aircrew developed CAD over the years, some with severe coronary artery stenoses and MI. Further optimization of individual prognosis and aeromedical disposition should aim at appropriate CAD screening and risk factor elimination. CAD management needs a comprehensive approach regarding military aviation requirements and clinical guidance.Guettler N, Sammito S. Coronary artery disease management in military aircrew. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):917-922.

INTRODUCTION: The advancement of human spaceflight has made urgent the need to develop medical imaging technology to ensure a high level of in-flight care. To date, only ultrasound has been used in spaceflight. Radiography has multiple advantages over ultrasound, including lower operator dependence, more rapid acquisition, typically higher spatial resolution, and characterization of tissue with acoustic impedance precluding ultrasound. This proof-of-concept work demonstrates for the first time the feasibility of performing human radiographs in microgravity.METHODS: Radiographs of a phantom and human subject's hand, knee, chest, cervical spine, and pelvis were obtained aboard a parabolic flight in microgravity and simulated lunar gravity with various subject and operator positions. Control radiographs were acquired with the same system on the ground. These radiographs were performed with a Food and Drug Administration-approved ultra-portable, wireless, battery-powered, digital x-ray system.RESULTS: The radiographs of the phantom acquired in reduced gravity were qualitatively and quantitatively compared to the ground controls and found to exhibit similar diagnostic adequacy. There was no statistically significant difference in contrast resolution or spatial resolution with a spatial resolution across all imaging environments up to the Nyquist frequency of 3.6 line-pairs/mm and an average contrast-to-noise ratio of 2.44.DISCUSSION: As mass, power, and volume limitations lessen over the coming decades and the miniaturization of imaging equipment continues, in-flight implementation of nonsonographic modalities will become practical. Given the demonstrated ease of use and satisfactory image quality, portable radiography is ready to be the new frontier of space medical imaging.Lerner D, Pohlen M, Wang A, Walter J, Cairnie M, Gifford S. X-ray imaging in the simulated microgravity environment of parabolic flight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(10):786-791.