首页 > 最新文献

American journal of epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Causal Diagrams Integrating Counterfactuals and Sufficient Causes. 整合反事实和充分原因的因果图。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag046
Etsuji Suzuki, Eiji Yamamoto
{"title":"Causal Diagrams Integrating Counterfactuals and Sufficient Causes.","authors":"Etsuji Suzuki, Eiji Yamamoto","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Referral of patients with cognitive impairment to specialty memory care: associations with patient-centered outcomes and specificity of diagnoses. 认知障碍患者转介到专业记忆护理:与以患者为中心的结果和诊断特异性的关联。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag034
Erin L Ferguson, Silvia Miramontes, Justin S White, Katherine L Possin, Anna Chodos, Fan Xia, Eva Raphael, Alexander K Smith, M Maria Glymour

Primary care providers (PCPs) may consider referring patients with cognitive impairment to clinicians specializing in memory care. We evaluated whether referrals are associated with quality-of-care and diagnostic outcomes, comparing estimates based on traditional and instrumental variables (IV) analyses. Analyses included individuals diagnosed with memory loss, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in a single healthcare system after 2005. Electronic health records were used to define referral to specialists and PCP preference (instrument) for referring. We modeled traditional and IV associations between referral to care and 14 patient-centered outcomes over 5 years of follow-up using adjusted Aalen additive hazards models. Overall, 1019 (15%) older adults were referred at diagnosis. Preference strongly predicted actual referral (F-statistic = 637). Referral was observationally associated with increased cumulative hazard of receiving a more specific cognitive diagnosis (hazard difference at year 5: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.15) and depression (0.09, 95% CI, 0.01-0.18). Using IV, referral was significantly associated with decreased hazard of ICD-defined weight loss (-0.35, 95% CI: -0.60,-0.09); other estimates were imprecise and consistent with possible benefits or harms. Given barriers in accessing specialty care, it is critical to further investigate how specialty care affects outcomes of individuals with living with cognitive impairment.

初级保健提供者(pcp)可能会考虑将认知障碍患者转介给专门从事记忆护理的临床医生。我们评估了转诊是否与护理质量和诊断结果相关,比较了基于传统和工具变量(IV)分析的估计。分析包括2005年后在单一医疗保健系统中被诊断为记忆丧失、轻度认知障碍或阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)的个体。电子健康记录用于确定转诊到专科医生和PCP偏好(工具)转诊。我们使用调整后的Aalen加性风险模型,对转诊与5年随访期间14个以患者为中心的结局之间的传统和IV相关性进行建模。总体而言,1019名(15%)老年人在诊断时被转诊。偏好强烈预测实际转诊(F-statistic = 637)。转诊与接受更具体的认知诊断的累积风险增加(第5年的风险差异:0.09,95% CI: 0.04-0.15)和抑郁症(0.09,95% CI, 0.01-0.18)有观察性相关。使用静脉注射,转诊与icd定义的体重减轻风险降低显著相关(-0.35,95% CI: -0.60,-0.09);其他估计并不精确,与可能的益处或危害一致。鉴于获得专业护理的障碍,进一步研究专业护理如何影响认知障碍患者的预后是至关重要的。
{"title":"Referral of patients with cognitive impairment to specialty memory care: associations with patient-centered outcomes and specificity of diagnoses.","authors":"Erin L Ferguson, Silvia Miramontes, Justin S White, Katherine L Possin, Anna Chodos, Fan Xia, Eva Raphael, Alexander K Smith, M Maria Glymour","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary care providers (PCPs) may consider referring patients with cognitive impairment to clinicians specializing in memory care. We evaluated whether referrals are associated with quality-of-care and diagnostic outcomes, comparing estimates based on traditional and instrumental variables (IV) analyses. Analyses included individuals diagnosed with memory loss, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in a single healthcare system after 2005. Electronic health records were used to define referral to specialists and PCP preference (instrument) for referring. We modeled traditional and IV associations between referral to care and 14 patient-centered outcomes over 5 years of follow-up using adjusted Aalen additive hazards models. Overall, 1019 (15%) older adults were referred at diagnosis. Preference strongly predicted actual referral (F-statistic = 637). Referral was observationally associated with increased cumulative hazard of receiving a more specific cognitive diagnosis (hazard difference at year 5: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.15) and depression (0.09, 95% CI, 0.01-0.18). Using IV, referral was significantly associated with decreased hazard of ICD-defined weight loss (-0.35, 95% CI: -0.60,-0.09); other estimates were imprecise and consistent with possible benefits or harms. Given barriers in accessing specialty care, it is critical to further investigate how specialty care affects outcomes of individuals with living with cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An approach to estimating how effective and well-targeted Extreme Risk Protection Orders have been with respect to suicide prevention. 一种评估极端风险保护令在预防自杀方面的有效性和针对性的方法。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag038
Sonja A Swanson, Jessica Handy, Veronica A Pear, Yifan Zhang, David Studdert, Hyunseung Kang, Elizabeth Diemer, Matthew Miller

Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO) are state laws intended to prevent gun violence by preemptively and temporarily removing firearms from individuals determined to be at risk of self-harm or violence against others. Here, we propose a framework for tackling questions about how well ERPOs have been targeted to those at highest risk of suicide and how effective ERPOs are at preventing suicide among those who were targeted. This framework makes use of novel causal inference approaches using data on ERPOs issued and suicide deaths that could be reasonably obtained in many states with ERPO policies. More specifically, we formalize estimands related to effectiveness and risk-targeting and describe the conditions under which these estimands can be identified or bounded with available data. We provide adaptable R code for implementing these approaches and highlight key considerations for using these methods in practice.

极端风险保护令(ERPO)是州法律,旨在通过先发制人和暂时从确定有自残或对他人施暴风险的个人手中没收枪支来防止枪支暴力。在这里,我们提出了一个框架来解决以下问题:ERPOs针对自杀风险最高的人的效果如何,以及ERPOs在预防目标人群自杀方面的效果如何。该框架使用了新的因果推理方法,使用了在许多有ERPO政策的州可以合理获得的关于ERPO发布和自杀死亡的数据。更具体地说,我们形式化了与有效性和风险目标相关的评估,并描述了这些评估可以被识别或被可用数据限制的条件。我们提供了可适应的R代码来实现这些方法,并强调了在实践中使用这些方法的关键注意事项。
{"title":"An approach to estimating how effective and well-targeted Extreme Risk Protection Orders have been with respect to suicide prevention.","authors":"Sonja A Swanson, Jessica Handy, Veronica A Pear, Yifan Zhang, David Studdert, Hyunseung Kang, Elizabeth Diemer, Matthew Miller","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO) are state laws intended to prevent gun violence by preemptively and temporarily removing firearms from individuals determined to be at risk of self-harm or violence against others. Here, we propose a framework for tackling questions about how well ERPOs have been targeted to those at highest risk of suicide and how effective ERPOs are at preventing suicide among those who were targeted. This framework makes use of novel causal inference approaches using data on ERPOs issued and suicide deaths that could be reasonably obtained in many states with ERPO policies. More specifically, we formalize estimands related to effectiveness and risk-targeting and describe the conditions under which these estimands can be identified or bounded with available data. We provide adaptable R code for implementing these approaches and highlight key considerations for using these methods in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social determinants of health across the lifecourse and chronic disease risk: Available data and seminal findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. 整个生命过程中健康和慢性病风险的社会决定因素:来自社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究的可用数据和开创性发现
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag045
Anna M Kucharska-Newton, Ganga S Bey, Pamela L Lutsey, Jeremy Van'T Hof, Qian Xiao, Anna Prizment, Elizabeth Selvin, Priya Palta, Eric A Whitsel

This review article provides a summary of findings on the social determinants of chronic disease prevalence, incidence, and mortality from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, community surveillance of coronary heart disease conducted in four geographically distinct United States communities from 1987 through 2014 and an ongoing longitudinal cohort of 15,792 men and women recruited from those communities. The ARIC community surveillance documented the contribution of poor neighborhood socioeconomic status to trends in heart disease and to disparities in associated medical care. Data from members of the ARIC Study cohort, provide evidence on the importance of neighborhood and individual-level social determinants to the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and to the burden of cardiovascular disease and mortality, dementia, and kidney disease. Findings from the unique ARIC Lifecourse Socioeconomic Study conducted within the ARIC cohort, underscore the importance of socioeconomic exposures across the lifecourse to the prevention of chronic disease. The rich ARIC data on neighborhood deprivation, environmental exposures, physical and built environments, and racial and economic segregation, provide a foundation for innovative methodological approaches that integrate demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, and clinical risk factors-enabling researchers to identify optimal targets for effective chronic disease prevention.

这篇综述文章总结了社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究中慢性病患病率、发病率和死亡率的社会决定因素,该研究是1987年至2014年在美国四个地理上不同的社区进行的冠心病社区监测,并从这些社区招募了15,792名男性和女性。ARIC社区监测记录了贫穷的社区社会经济地位对心脏病趋势和相关医疗保健差异的贡献。来自ARIC研究队列成员的数据,为社区和个人层面的社会决定因素对心血管危险因素的患病率以及心血管疾病和死亡率、痴呆和肾脏疾病的负担的重要性提供了证据。在ARIC队列中进行的独特的ARIC生命过程社会经济研究的结果强调了整个生命过程中社会经济暴露对慢性疾病预防的重要性。ARIC关于邻里剥夺、环境暴露、物理和建筑环境以及种族和经济隔离的丰富数据,为整合人口、社会经济、行为和临床风险因素的创新方法方法提供了基础,使研究人员能够确定有效预防慢性疾病的最佳目标。
{"title":"Social determinants of health across the lifecourse and chronic disease risk: Available data and seminal findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.","authors":"Anna M Kucharska-Newton, Ganga S Bey, Pamela L Lutsey, Jeremy Van'T Hof, Qian Xiao, Anna Prizment, Elizabeth Selvin, Priya Palta, Eric A Whitsel","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review article provides a summary of findings on the social determinants of chronic disease prevalence, incidence, and mortality from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, community surveillance of coronary heart disease conducted in four geographically distinct United States communities from 1987 through 2014 and an ongoing longitudinal cohort of 15,792 men and women recruited from those communities. The ARIC community surveillance documented the contribution of poor neighborhood socioeconomic status to trends in heart disease and to disparities in associated medical care. Data from members of the ARIC Study cohort, provide evidence on the importance of neighborhood and individual-level social determinants to the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and to the burden of cardiovascular disease and mortality, dementia, and kidney disease. Findings from the unique ARIC Lifecourse Socioeconomic Study conducted within the ARIC cohort, underscore the importance of socioeconomic exposures across the lifecourse to the prevention of chronic disease. The rich ARIC data on neighborhood deprivation, environmental exposures, physical and built environments, and racial and economic segregation, provide a foundation for innovative methodological approaches that integrate demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, and clinical risk factors-enabling researchers to identify optimal targets for effective chronic disease prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Bias and Precision in State Policy Evaluations: A Comparative Analysis of Time-Varying Estimators Using Policy Simulations. 评估国家政策评估中的偏差和精度:使用政策模拟的时变估计器的比较分析。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag041
Max Griswold, Beth Ann Griffin, Max Rubinstein, Mincen Liu, Megan Schuler, Elizabeth Stone, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Bradley D Stein, Elizabeth A Stuart

Using state-level opioid overdose mortality data (1999-2016), we evaluated the performance of panel data estimators for capturing time-varying impacts of state-level policies. Most health policy evaluations assume static treatment effects, yet many interventions exhibit dynamic impacts, raising methodological questions about optimal estimation strategies. We simulated four time-varying treatment scenarios reflecting common policy dynamics (gradual increase, gradual decline, temporary effects, and inconsistent trajectories) and compared seven methods: two-way fixed effects event study, debiased autoregressive model, augmented synthetic control, difference-in-differences with staggered adoption, event study with heterogeneous treatment, two-stage differences-in-differences, and differences-in-differences imputation. Performance was assessed using bias, standard errors, coverage probability, and root mean squared error. Estimator performance varied substantially across scenarios. Augmented synthetic controls showed lower bias but higher variance when policy effectiveness diminished over time. Difference-in-difference approaches provided reasonable coverage in some scenarios but struggled with non-monotonic effects, while autoregressive methods exhibited lower variability but underestimated uncertainty. Overall, no single estimator performed best across settings. For epidemiological policy evaluations, particularly time-sensitive interventions like opioid-related policies, researchers should weigh bias-variance tradeoffs and align methodological choices with expected effect trajectories. Careful selection of analytic approaches is critical to avoid misattribution of policy effects and ensure valid conclusions about population health outcomes.

使用国家级阿片类药物过量死亡率数据(1999-2016),我们评估了面板数据估计器在捕捉国家级政策时变影响方面的表现。大多数卫生政策评估假设静态治疗效果,但许多干预措施表现出动态影响,提出了关于最佳估计策略的方法学问题。我们模拟了反映共同政策动态的四种时变处理方案(逐渐增加、逐渐下降、临时效果和不一致的轨迹),并比较了七种方法:双向固定效应事件研究、去偏自回归模型、增强综合控制、交错采用的差异中差异研究、异质处理的事件研究、两阶段差异中差异和差异中差异归算。使用偏倚、标准误差、覆盖概率和均方根误差来评估性能。估计器的性能在不同的场景中变化很大。当政策有效性随着时间的推移而降低时,增强综合控制显示出较低的偏差,但较高的方差。差中差方法在某些情况下提供了合理的覆盖范围,但难以应对非单调效应,而自回归方法表现出较低的变异性,但低估了不确定性。总的来说,没有一个估算器在所有设置中表现最好。对于流行病学政策评估,特别是时间敏感的干预措施,如阿片类药物相关政策,研究人员应该权衡偏差-方差权衡,并将方法选择与预期效果轨迹保持一致。仔细选择分析方法对于避免政策影响的错误归因和确保关于人口健康结果的有效结论至关重要。
{"title":"Assessing Bias and Precision in State Policy Evaluations: A Comparative Analysis of Time-Varying Estimators Using Policy Simulations.","authors":"Max Griswold, Beth Ann Griffin, Max Rubinstein, Mincen Liu, Megan Schuler, Elizabeth Stone, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Bradley D Stein, Elizabeth A Stuart","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using state-level opioid overdose mortality data (1999-2016), we evaluated the performance of panel data estimators for capturing time-varying impacts of state-level policies. Most health policy evaluations assume static treatment effects, yet many interventions exhibit dynamic impacts, raising methodological questions about optimal estimation strategies. We simulated four time-varying treatment scenarios reflecting common policy dynamics (gradual increase, gradual decline, temporary effects, and inconsistent trajectories) and compared seven methods: two-way fixed effects event study, debiased autoregressive model, augmented synthetic control, difference-in-differences with staggered adoption, event study with heterogeneous treatment, two-stage differences-in-differences, and differences-in-differences imputation. Performance was assessed using bias, standard errors, coverage probability, and root mean squared error. Estimator performance varied substantially across scenarios. Augmented synthetic controls showed lower bias but higher variance when policy effectiveness diminished over time. Difference-in-difference approaches provided reasonable coverage in some scenarios but struggled with non-monotonic effects, while autoregressive methods exhibited lower variability but underestimated uncertainty. Overall, no single estimator performed best across settings. For epidemiological policy evaluations, particularly time-sensitive interventions like opioid-related policies, researchers should weigh bias-variance tradeoffs and align methodological choices with expected effect trajectories. Careful selection of analytic approaches is critical to avoid misattribution of policy effects and ensure valid conclusions about population health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147315909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of damp housing on psychological distress: does respiratory health matter? 潮湿住房对心理困扰的影响:呼吸健康重要吗?
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag042
Maria Rosa Gatto, Ang Li, Erika Martino, Rebecca Bentley

Background: Damp housing is associated with poor mental health. However, it is unknown whether people with chronic respiratory conditions (CRCs) have increased risk of negative mental health effects, given their increased susceptibility to dampness-related physical health effects.

Methods: Data from the British Household Panel Survey were used to quantify the differential effect of damp housing exposure on psychological distress by CRC status. Adjusted fixed effects logistic regression models stratified by CRC were performed, followed by models testing for statistical interaction.

Results: In stratified models, people living with a CRC at baseline reported greater odds of psychological distress associated with damp housing (OR = 1·27, 95% CI: [1·14, 1·41], p<0·01) compared with people in good respiratory health (OR = 1·07, 95% CI: [1·02, 1·12], p=0·01). There was weak evidence of effect modification by change in CRC status (interaction term OR = 1·09, 95% CI: [0·98, 1·20], p=0·10). However, there was strong evidence of effect modification by baseline CRC status (interaction term OR = 1·19, 95% CI: [1·06, 1·34], p<0·01).

Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that remediating sources of dampness in the home may alleviate some of the mental toll of living with a chronic respiratory condition.

背景:潮湿的住房与不良的心理健康有关。然而,考虑到慢性呼吸系统疾病(CRCs)患者更容易受到与潮湿相关的身体健康影响,目前尚不清楚他们是否会增加负面心理健康影响的风险。方法:使用来自英国家庭小组调查的数据来量化潮湿住房暴露对CRC状态心理困扰的差异影响。采用CRC分层的调整固定效应logistic回归模型,并对模型进行统计交互作用检验。结果:在分层模型中,CRC患者在基线时报告与潮湿住房相关的心理困扰的几率更高(OR = 1.27, 95% CI:[1.14, 1.41])。结论:我们的分析表明,修复家中潮湿的来源可能会减轻慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的一些精神负担。
{"title":"The effect of damp housing on psychological distress: does respiratory health matter?","authors":"Maria Rosa Gatto, Ang Li, Erika Martino, Rebecca Bentley","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Damp housing is associated with poor mental health. However, it is unknown whether people with chronic respiratory conditions (CRCs) have increased risk of negative mental health effects, given their increased susceptibility to dampness-related physical health effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the British Household Panel Survey were used to quantify the differential effect of damp housing exposure on psychological distress by CRC status. Adjusted fixed effects logistic regression models stratified by CRC were performed, followed by models testing for statistical interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stratified models, people living with a CRC at baseline reported greater odds of psychological distress associated with damp housing (OR = 1·27, 95% CI: [1·14, 1·41], p<0·01) compared with people in good respiratory health (OR = 1·07, 95% CI: [1·02, 1·12], p=0·01). There was weak evidence of effect modification by change in CRC status (interaction term OR = 1·09, 95% CI: [0·98, 1·20], p=0·10). However, there was strong evidence of effect modification by baseline CRC status (interaction term OR = 1·19, 95% CI: [1·06, 1·34], p<0·01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis suggests that remediating sources of dampness in the home may alleviate some of the mental toll of living with a chronic respiratory condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147315927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social determinants of health, life expectancy and future health risks among adults with rheumatoid arthritis: two cohort studies in the China and UK. 类风湿性关节炎成人健康、预期寿命和未来健康风险的社会决定因素:中国和英国的两项队列研究
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag039
Jie Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Qianling Ye, Xuan Wang, Dandan Huang, Yoriko Heianza, Hao Ma, Lu Qi, Dongqing Ye

This study investigated associations between social determinants of health (SDoHs) and life expectancy and health risks among rheumatoid arthritis patients in China and the UK. Analyzing data from China Kadoorie Biobank (10,298 patients aged 30-79 years) and UK Biobank (4,975 patients aged 37-73 years), composite SDoH scores incorporating five domains (financial circumstances, education, healthcare access, neighborhood environment, and social context) were generated based on mortality associations and categorized into favorable, medium, and unfavorable groups. During median follow-up of 10.4 years (China) and 13.8 years (UK), unfavorable SDoH was associated with higher mortality risk in both cohorts (China: HR 1.62 [95% CI 1.36-1.92]; UK: HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.50-2.16]). Life expectancy reduction at age 45 due to unfavorable SDoH showed sex-specific patterns within each cohort: in China, women lost 4.7 years and men lost 4 years; in UK, men lost 6.8 years and women lost 4 years. Phenome-wide analysis for incident diseases identified 51 conditions with 1.2-5.2-fold increased risks among those with unfavorable SDoH, including heart failure, obstructive chronic bronchitis, and renal failure. Findings suggest that disadvantaged SDoH were associated with significantly lower life expectancy and higher risks of multiple adverse health outcomes among adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

本研究调查了中国和英国类风湿关节炎患者的健康社会决定因素(SDoHs)与预期寿命和健康风险之间的关系。通过分析中国嘉道里生物银行(10298名年龄在30-79岁之间的患者)和英国生物银行(4975名年龄在37-73岁之间的患者)的数据,基于死亡率关联生成了包含五个领域(经济状况、教育、医疗保健获取、社区环境和社会背景)的综合SDoH评分,并将其分为有利、中等和不利组。在中位随访10.4年(中国)和13.8年(英国)期间,两个队列中不良SDoH与较高的死亡风险相关(中国:HR 1.62 [95% CI 1.36-1.92];英国:HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.50-2.16])。在每个队列中,由于不利的SDoH而导致的45岁预期寿命减少表现出性别特异性模式:在中国,女性减少4.7年,男性减少4年;在英国,男性减了6.8岁,女性减了4岁。对突发疾病的全现象分析确定了51种情况,不利SDoH患者的风险增加了1.2-5.2倍,包括心力衰竭、阻塞性慢性支气管炎和肾衰竭。研究结果表明,在类风湿关节炎成人患者中,不利的SDoH与预期寿命显著降低和多种不良健康结局的高风险相关。
{"title":"Social determinants of health, life expectancy and future health risks among adults with rheumatoid arthritis: two cohort studies in the China and UK.","authors":"Jie Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Qianling Ye, Xuan Wang, Dandan Huang, Yoriko Heianza, Hao Ma, Lu Qi, Dongqing Ye","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated associations between social determinants of health (SDoHs) and life expectancy and health risks among rheumatoid arthritis patients in China and the UK. Analyzing data from China Kadoorie Biobank (10,298 patients aged 30-79 years) and UK Biobank (4,975 patients aged 37-73 years), composite SDoH scores incorporating five domains (financial circumstances, education, healthcare access, neighborhood environment, and social context) were generated based on mortality associations and categorized into favorable, medium, and unfavorable groups. During median follow-up of 10.4 years (China) and 13.8 years (UK), unfavorable SDoH was associated with higher mortality risk in both cohorts (China: HR 1.62 [95% CI 1.36-1.92]; UK: HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.50-2.16]). Life expectancy reduction at age 45 due to unfavorable SDoH showed sex-specific patterns within each cohort: in China, women lost 4.7 years and men lost 4 years; in UK, men lost 6.8 years and women lost 4 years. Phenome-wide analysis for incident diseases identified 51 conditions with 1.2-5.2-fold increased risks among those with unfavorable SDoH, including heart failure, obstructive chronic bronchitis, and renal failure. Findings suggest that disadvantaged SDoH were associated with significantly lower life expectancy and higher risks of multiple adverse health outcomes among adults with rheumatoid arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147300843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to "Predicting cohort-specific cervical cancer incidence from population-based surveys of human papilloma virus prevalence: a worldwide study". 更正“从基于人群的人乳头瘤病毒流行率调查预测特定人群宫颈癌发病率:一项全球研究”。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae310
Rosa Schulte-Frohlinde, Damien Georges, Gary Clifford, Iacopo Baussano
{"title":"Correction to \"Predicting cohort-specific cervical cancer incidence from population-based surveys of human papilloma virus prevalence: a worldwide study\".","authors":"Rosa Schulte-Frohlinde, Damien Georges, Gary Clifford, Iacopo Baussano","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae310","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147300879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring the Validity of Survey Questions on Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Screening. 测量乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌筛查调查问题的效度。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag040
Larry G Kessler, Bryan Comstock, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Jin Mou, Michael G Nash, Perla Bravo, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Chaya Pflugeisen, Hongyuan Gao, Rachel L Winer, India J Ornelas, Cynthia Smith, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Punith Shetty, Uma G Raghavan

Background: The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is used to measure progress on cancer screening. We assessed validity of questions on cervical, colorectal, breast, and lung cancer screening from the 2020, 2021, and 2022 NHIS, using electronic medical records as our standard for accuracy.

Methods: We surveyed 1,770 adults ages 21+ years for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer from four US health systems. We made slight changes in question order and wording to improve understanding of questions. We compared survey responses for screening adherence with electronic medical record (EMR) data as a gold standard, calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Cohen's Kappa, and reports-to-records ratio.

Results: Self-reported screening adherence had high sensitivity for most cancer types (range 0.79-0.96). We found good agreement for breast cancer screening using Cohen's Kappa (0.81) and more modest agreement for the other three cancer sites (0.59-0.65). The reports-to-records ratio showed over-reporting cancer screening ranging from 12% to ⁓50% more screening reported for the USPSTF recommended screening periodicity compared to medical record data.

Conclusions: NHIS questions that assess cancer screening provide reasonably accurate estimates. However, some misclassification with expected bias toward over-reporting screening suggests that improvements in measuring screening adherence are needed.

背景:国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)被用来衡量癌症筛查的进展。我们评估了2020年、2021年和2022年NHIS中宫颈癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和肺癌筛查问题的有效性,使用电子病历作为准确性标准。方法:我们调查了1770名年龄在21岁以上的成年人,包括来自美国四个卫生系统的乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌。为了更好地理解问题,我们对问题的顺序和措辞做了一些改动。我们将调查结果与电子病历(EMR)数据作为金标准进行比较,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、Cohen’s Kappa和报告记录比。结果:自我报告的筛查依从性对大多数癌症类型具有高敏感性(范围为0.79-0.96)。我们发现使用Cohen's Kappa进行乳腺癌筛查的一致性很好(0.81),其他三个癌症部位的一致性更低(0.59-0.65)。报告与记录的比率显示,癌症筛查的报告从12%到⁓,与医疗记录数据相比,USPSTF推荐的筛查周期报告的筛查多50%。结论:评估癌症筛查的NHIS问题提供了合理准确的估计。然而,一些对过度报告筛查的预期偏差的错误分类表明,在测量筛查依从性方面需要改进。
{"title":"Measuring the Validity of Survey Questions on Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Screening.","authors":"Larry G Kessler, Bryan Comstock, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Jin Mou, Michael G Nash, Perla Bravo, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Chaya Pflugeisen, Hongyuan Gao, Rachel L Winer, India J Ornelas, Cynthia Smith, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Punith Shetty, Uma G Raghavan","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is used to measure progress on cancer screening. We assessed validity of questions on cervical, colorectal, breast, and lung cancer screening from the 2020, 2021, and 2022 NHIS, using electronic medical records as our standard for accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 1,770 adults ages 21+ years for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer from four US health systems. We made slight changes in question order and wording to improve understanding of questions. We compared survey responses for screening adherence with electronic medical record (EMR) data as a gold standard, calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Cohen's Kappa, and reports-to-records ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reported screening adherence had high sensitivity for most cancer types (range 0.79-0.96). We found good agreement for breast cancer screening using Cohen's Kappa (0.81) and more modest agreement for the other three cancer sites (0.59-0.65). The reports-to-records ratio showed over-reporting cancer screening ranging from 12% to ⁓50% more screening reported for the USPSTF recommended screening periodicity compared to medical record data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NHIS questions that assess cancer screening provide reasonably accurate estimates. However, some misclassification with expected bias toward over-reporting screening suggests that improvements in measuring screening adherence are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147300840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiencing Unfair Treatment is Associated with Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Black Adults. 经历不公平待遇与老年黑人心血管疾病发病率相关
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-23 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwag035
Jessica R Fernandez, Juliana S Sherchan, Roma Dhingra, Symielle A Gaston, Chandra L Jackson, Allana T Forde

Experiencing discrimination may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), which disproportionately impacts Black adults in the United States. With the few prospective, time-varying investigations, evidence of everyday discrimination impacting incident CVD is sparse, especially among older Black adults. This study examined the association between everyday discrimination and incident CVD across a 12-year period using a nationally representative population of older Black adults from the Health and Retirement Study. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression estimated the association between everyday discrimination (measured on a continuous scale) and incident CVD. Supplemental analyses examined the association between everyday discrimination and incident CVD among those who experienced racial versus non-racial discrimination. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and CVD risk factors. At baseline, participants (N=988) were 65 years old on average and 57.3% were female. During the 12-year period, 16.3% of participants developed CVD. Each increase in everyday discrimination was associated with a higher incidence of CVD in fully adjusted models (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03-1.59). Older Black adults who experience frequent everyday discrimination may be at higher risk of developing CVD. Clinical and non-clinical interventions assessing and addressing experiences of discrimination may help in CVD prevention efforts among Black adults.

遭受歧视可能是心血管疾病(CVD)的一个危险因素,这对美国黑人成年人的影响尤为严重。由于前瞻性的时变调查很少,日常歧视影响心血管疾病的证据很少,特别是在老年黑人成年人中。本研究通过健康与退休研究中具有全国代表性的老年黑人人群,调查了12年期间日常歧视与心血管疾病事件之间的关系。加权Cox比例风险回归估计了日常歧视(在连续尺度上测量)与心血管疾病事件之间的关联。补充分析研究了在经历过种族歧视和非种族歧视的人群中,日常歧视与心血管疾病之间的关系。协变量包括社会人口学特征、健康行为和心血管疾病危险因素。基线时,参与者(N=988)平均年龄为65岁,其中57.3%为女性。在12年期间,16.3%的参与者患上了心血管疾病。在完全校正模型中,每日歧视的每增加都与CVD的较高发生率相关(校正风险比:1.28,95% CI: 1.03-1.59)。经常遭受歧视的老年黑人成年人可能患心血管疾病的风险更高。评估和处理歧视经历的临床和非临床干预可能有助于黑人成年人预防心血管疾病的努力。
{"title":"Experiencing Unfair Treatment is Associated with Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Black Adults.","authors":"Jessica R Fernandez, Juliana S Sherchan, Roma Dhingra, Symielle A Gaston, Chandra L Jackson, Allana T Forde","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experiencing discrimination may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), which disproportionately impacts Black adults in the United States. With the few prospective, time-varying investigations, evidence of everyday discrimination impacting incident CVD is sparse, especially among older Black adults. This study examined the association between everyday discrimination and incident CVD across a 12-year period using a nationally representative population of older Black adults from the Health and Retirement Study. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression estimated the association between everyday discrimination (measured on a continuous scale) and incident CVD. Supplemental analyses examined the association between everyday discrimination and incident CVD among those who experienced racial versus non-racial discrimination. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and CVD risk factors. At baseline, participants (N=988) were 65 years old on average and 57.3% were female. During the 12-year period, 16.3% of participants developed CVD. Each increase in everyday discrimination was associated with a higher incidence of CVD in fully adjusted models (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03-1.59). Older Black adults who experience frequent everyday discrimination may be at higher risk of developing CVD. Clinical and non-clinical interventions assessing and addressing experiences of discrimination may help in CVD prevention efforts among Black adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1