AIDS patient care and STDs最新文献

Improved life expectancy from advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been followed by a rise in comorbidities and polypharmacy in this aging population. Historically, polypharmacy has been associated with suboptimal virologic outcomes in persons with HIV, although data in the current ART era and among historically marginalized populations in the United States are limited. We measured the prevalence of comorbidities and polypharmacy, evaluating their impact on virologic suppression. This retrospective IRB-approved cross-sectional study reviewed health records of adults with HIV on ART and receiving care (≥2 visits) in 2019 at a single center in a historically minoritized community. Virologic suppression (HIV RNA <200 copies/mL) based on polypharmacy (≥5 non-HIV medications) or multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions) was evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with virologic suppression, with age, race/ethnicity, and CD4 < 200 cells/mm³ as covariates. Of the 963 individuals that met the criteria, 67%, 47%, and 34% had ≥1 comorbidity, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy, respectively. The cohort demographics were: mean of 49 years (range, 18-81), 40% cisgender women, 46% Latinx individuals, 45% Black individuals, 8% White individuals. Virologic suppression rates were 95% among patients with polypharmacy compared with 86% in those with a lower pill burden (p = 0.0001). The odds of virologic success were higher for individuals with polypharmacy [adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.3 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.2-4.4)] and Latinx identity [aOR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.5-3.8)], but lower if a CD4 count <200 cells/mm³ [aOR = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04-0.1)]. The comorbidity burden was higher than previously described, which are driving polypharmacy rates. In the current ART era, polypharmacy is not inherently associated with worse virologic outcomes.

One hope surrounding long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is reaching new users who could most benefit, as well as improving the experiences of oral PrEP users who may desire to switch modalities. Gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex with men (GBQM) continue to make up over half of new HIV diagnoses in Canada, and oral PrEP uptake has plateaued among this population. Approval of injectable PrEP is anticipated, but there is a paucity of research to inform health promotion and implementation. Between June and October 2021, we conducted 22 in-depth interviews with GBQM oral PrEP users and non-PrEP users living in Ontario, Canada. We also conducted small focus groups or individual interviews with 20 key stakeholders (health care providers, public health officials, community-based organization staff). Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in NVivo using thematic analysis. Only about one-third of GBQM had heard of injectable PrEP. Many PrEP users perceived greater convenience, adherence, and confidentiality with injectable PrEP. Some PrEP users did not anticipate switching because of needle discomfort or feeling more "in control" with oral PrEP. None of the non-PrEP users said that injectable PrEP would make them start PrEP. Injectable PrEP may offer additional convenience for GBQM; however, it did not appear to affect participants' PrEP decision-making significantly. Stakeholders noted that injectable PrEP may improve access, support adherence, and benefit marginalized groups. Some clinicians expressed concerns about the time/personnel required to make injectable PrEP available. System-level challenges in implementing injectable PrEP, including cost, must also be addressed.

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI ART), such as a bimonthly injection of cabotegravir/rilpivirine, is a promising HIV treatment option. LAI ART may particularly benefit people who are reluctant to initiate or are poorly adherent to daily oral pills and not virally suppressed. However, the acceptability and feasibility of LAI ART among individuals with viremia in Africa has not been well studied. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 38 people living with HIV with viral load ≥1000 copies/mL and 15 medical and nursing staff, and 6 focus group discussions with peer health workers, to examine acceptability and feasibility of LAI ART in south-central Uganda. Transcripts were thematically analyzed through a team-based framework approach. Most people living with HIV reacted positively toward LAI ART and endorsed interest in taking it themselves. Most felt LAI ART would make adherence easier by reducing the challenge with remembering daily pills, particularly in the context of busy schedules, travel, alcohol use, and dietary requirements. Participants also appreciated the privacy of injections, reducing the likelihood of stigma or inadvertent HIV serostatus disclosure with pill possession. Concerns about LAI ART included side effects, perceived medication effectiveness, fear of injection, and medical mistrust and conspiracy beliefs. Health workers and participants with viremia also noted health system challenges, such as stockouts and monitoring treatment failure. However, they felt the health system could overcome these challenges. Implementation complexities must be addressed as LAI ART is introduced and expanded in Africa to best support viral suppression and address HIV care continuum gaps.

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain a major challenge for people with HIV in the antiretroviral therapy era. Cocaine use may trigger/exacerbate HAND among African American (AA) adults, especially women. Between 2018 and 2019, 922 adults, predominantly AAs, with/without HIV and with/without cocaine use in Baltimore, Maryland, were enrolled in a study investigating the association of HIV and cocaine use with neurocognitive impairment (NCI). Neurocognitive performance was assessed with the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). NCI was considered to be present if the fully adjusted standard score for at least two cognitive domains was 1.0 standard deviation below the mean. Although the overall analysis showed HIV and female sex were associated with NCI, the associations were dependent on cocaine use. Neither HIV [adj prevalence ratio (PR): 1.12, confidence interval (95% CI): 0.77-1.64] nor female sex (adj PR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.71-1.61) was associated with NCI among cocaine nonusers, while both HIV (adj PR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06-1.81) and female sex (adj PR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.18-1.98) were associated with NCI in cocaine users. HIV was associated with two NIHTB-CB measures overall. In addition, HIV was associated with a lower dimensional change card sort score (an executive function measure) in cocaine users and not in nonusers. Cognitive performance was poorer in female than in male cocaine users. The adverse effect of HIV on cognitive performance predominantly affected cocaine users. However, cocaine use may moderate the impact of HIV and female sex on cognitive performance, highlighting the importance of reducing cocaine use in NCI prevention among the AA population.

The discovery that people with an undetectable HIV viral load are unable to transmit the virus to sex partners (U = U) has ushered in a new era in HIV care. As a result of this discovery, treatment as prevention (TasP) has become a powerful tool toward ending the epidemic. However, despite its sound scientific basis, many communities affected by HIV face barriers toward adopting TasP as a complete HIV prevention strategy. In addition, most research to date has only focused on TasP in the context of committed monogamous partnerships. To identify barriers to TasP adoption among some of those most affected by HIV, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 62 sexual and gender minority individuals of varying serostatuses. Participants were identified from the results of an online survey, where those who indicated at least some awareness of TasP were invited to partake in a follow-up interview. Interviews were thematically coded to identify emergent themes relating to TasP adoption. Seven primary barriers emerged from data analysis pertaining to TasP science, internalized beliefs about HIV safety, and interactional dynamics between partners: (1) unfamiliarity with TasP science, (2) perceived limitations of TasP science, (3) difficulty changing understanding of "safe sex," (4) unwillingness to rely on partners' reports of being undetectable, (5) persistent HIV stigma, (6) less difficulty finding serosimilar partners, and (7) difficulty incorporating TasP into casual encounters. Together, these barriers confirm the existing findings about TasP adoption, and extend the literature by identifying barriers beyond a lack of education and outside of monogamous contexts.

We conducted a web-based survey targeting physicians in specialties of treating sexually transmitted infection (STI) and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients to understand the current STI/HIV care practices and their acceptability of and barriers to the prescription of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Japan. A descriptive analysis was used to summarize survey responses. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with willingness to prescribe PrEP. Of 316 survey respondents, 57 were specialized in HIV, 90 STI/Urology/Proctology, 55 Obstetrics/Gynecology, and 114 General Practice/Internal Medicine/Dermatology. Proportion of HIV-specialized physicians who interview the patients about risk behaviors tended to be higher than other physician groups (84.2% vs. 54.8%, 47.3%, and 50.9%, respectively), and 53 - 75% of non-HIV-specialized physicians reported that they were incapable of making decisions on HIV medications. Higher PrEP knowledge enhanced the willingness to recommend and prescribe PrEP drugs (odds ratio: 2.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-4.10, p = 0.0044), and 45.4% physicians with no PrEP knowledge raised the concern of incapability to respond and manage when an individual is infected with HIV. Educational opportunities on management and prevention measures for both STI and HIV may encourage non-HIV-specialized physicians to be involved in HIV care and to enhance initiation of HIV tests and adoption of PrEP.

Biologic therapies have been increasingly developed and used for the treatment of severe inflammatory diseases. However, the safety and efficacy profile of biologic drugs in patients with HIV is not well established as this patient population is historically excluded from clinical trials. We review the available evidence of biologic use in people with HIV. We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to June 29, 2022 and included studies that treated patients with HIV who have inflammatory disease using biologic drugs. Clinical data regarding safety and efficacy were abstracted into tables. One hundred twelve studies were included, and 179 patients were included in our study. Nearly all classes of biologics drugs had a favorable safety profile with minimal or minor adverse events. Anti-CD-20 inhibitors and TNF-alpha inhibitors were associated with opportunistic infections. Transient increase in HIV viral load was noted with use of some agents such as TNF-alpha inhibitors. The quality of evidence is low, restricted to case reports and retrospective reviews. However, the safety profile of biologics observed in these patients with HIV was overall favorable.

HIV remains a significant public health concern in the United States, with 34,800 new cases diagnosed in 2019; of those, 18% were among women. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine is effective and safe, reducing HIV transmission by up to 92% in women. Though studies demonstrate low rates of PrEP adherence among cisgender women prescribed oral PrEP, little is known about the factors that shape PrEP continuation among them. This study focuses on understanding the experiences of cisgender women who have initiated PrEP to gain insight into the factors that shape PrEP continuation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with (N = 20) women who had been prescribed oral PrEP. Interviews were guided by the social-ecological framework to identify multilevel factors affecting PrEP continuation; we specifically examined the experience of engagement and retention in the PrEP cascade. We recruited women who had been prescribed oral PrEP by a government-sponsored sexual health center or a hospital-based family planning clinic in Washington, DC. Factors facilitating PrEP continuation included a positive emotional experience associated with PrEP use, high perceived risk of HIV acquisition, and high-quality communication with health care providers. The most common reason for PrEP discontinuation was low perceived HIV risk (n = 11). Other factors influencing discontinuation were side effects, a negative emotional experience while using PrEP, and negative interactions with the health care system. This study underscores the importance of specific multi-level factors, including the provision of high-quality communication designed to resonate with women and shared decision making between women and their health care providers.