The clinical teacher最新文献

Background: Effective learning from simulation-based training depends on expert facilitation by skilled faculty members, but there are few guidelines upon which to base simulation development. A collaborative approach was taken in the East of England to determine the agreed content of such a course.

Methods: A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus amongst the simulation-provider leads in the East of England on what should be the essential elements of a training course for faculty members. A questionnaire designed by a steering group was circulated to the consensus group, and their responses were used to modify subsequent questionnaires. There was enough agreement after two rounds not to require a third round.

Results: After two rounds there was high level of agreement that the educational content should include scenario design, creating a supportive learning environment, structured debriefing formats, human factors, educational feedback and communication. There was also agreement on preferred teaching methods, minimum qualification and continuing development for faculty members. There was moderate agreement on the prior experience required of faculty members, and no agreement on the costs of courses. Effective learning from simulation-based training depends upon expert facilitation by skilled faculty members

Discussion: By using a consensus method to determine the content and format of a simulation development course designed for faculty members, there is agreement in the East of England on what constitutes an educationally sound programme. This should provide assurance to both simulation providers and commissioners of education that despite the absence of guidelines, there is an agreed practice standard for simulation-based training in the region.

Background: Resource and curriculum constraints within contemporary university programmes limit opportunities for supervision and feedback of student practice. This study investigated the technological challenges, solutions and educational rewards in implementing Web-based student self-video of performance as a method to foster the development of student self-evaluation.

Methods: Physiotherapy students (n = 60) in their final preclinical semester participated in the study. All students received guidelines for constructing and uploading self-videos of performance to a Web-based learning system. Students completed a reflective task on each video submission after receiving online tutor feedback and viewing an exemplar peer performance. Students completed a survey of their learning experiences and challenges in completing the learning tasks. Technical information on submissions was obtained in usage reports from the Web-based learning system.

Results: Students were successful in recording and uploading digital videos of performance for remote tutor review. Students and tutors encountered technical problems that could be rectified and potentially avoided through activity design. Students reported that the utility of Web-based self-video for enhancing clinical performance outweighed the additional time and effort required in participation.

Conclusions: Web-based student self-video of performance, with remote tutor feedback and guided reflection, is a feasible method for increasing students' capacity for reflection and self-evaluation. Although technical difficulties are inherent in any technology-reliant activity, the students' increasing competence with emerging technologies encourage self-video teaching and learning activities as a resource for facilitating clinical skill development.

Background: Previous studies have shown peer-assisted learning (PAL) to be an effective method of teaching, with benefits to students and tutors; however, the effect of PAL in paediatrics has not been evaluated in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate a student-led paediatrics revision course for students preparing for examinations in medical specialties.

Methods: Students in their specialties year were invited to undergo a 1-day revision course consisting of a lecture and small group teaching, with a supplemental revision booklet. Tutors were recruited from the final-year cohort to facilitate the teaching. Questionnaires containing Likert-scale questions (1, strongly disagree; 5, strongly agree) were distributed before and after the course to assess its effectiveness.

Results: In all, 62 per cent (87/140) of students who attended the course responded to the study. Students felt significantly more prepared for their exam after the course (mean 3.47 post-course versus 2.16 pre-course), and significantly more prepared to manage children in clinical practice (mean 3.49 post-course versus 2.53 pre-course). Students rated the course as good (4.35/5), with the small group sessions deemed to be the most useful aspect. Tutors agreed that participating had improved their teaching in general (4.0/5), their confidence (4.1/5), their clinical knowledge (3.6/5) and their oral presentation skills (3.8/5).

Discussion: The results demonstrate an effective model for students and tutors in building vital skills in paediatrics and exam preparation. This reinforces the holistic positive attributes attainable from peer-assisted learning, and such schemes should be incorporated into undergraduate medical curricula for paediatrics to increase student confidence and potentially increase recruitment to paediatrics.