Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100449
Pragya Rai , Eva Gauchan , Richa Pradhan , Kabindra M. Shakya
Introduction
Physicians are often the first to witness the health effects of climate change and this allows them a unique platform to advocate for patients’ health. Developing countries are disproportionately impacted by climate change but less is known about the health effects related to climate change in these countries. This survey was done to summarize the observations of Nepali physicians on patients' health as affected by climate change, as well as to assess the need for educational opportunities in the medical community.
Methods
An electronic survey on health effects related to climate change and climate change awareness was sent to Nepali physicians by email and social media.
Results
Almost all Nepali physician respondents (99%, n = 177) reported climate change is happening, and 67% of respondents mentioned time and 53% of respondents noted knowledge as the main barriers for communicating about climate change with patients. Nepali physicians mentioned training (87%), continuing professional education (85%), health action alerts (84%), patient education materials (84%) and policy statements by professional associations (79%) would be helpful for climate change communication.
Conclusion
This survey presents a unique case study describing the health effects of climate change witnessed by physicians in Nepal. This survey highlights that Nepali physicians are keenly aware of the harmful effects of climate change on health, duly acknowledge gaps in education in this topic and report interest in future educational activities to enhance education and to improve their ability to communicate effectively regarding the health impacts of climate change with patients.
{"title":"Survey of Nepali doctors on the perception of climate change and health effects","authors":"Pragya Rai , Eva Gauchan , Richa Pradhan , Kabindra M. Shakya","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100449","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100449","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Physicians are often the first to witness the health effects of climate change and this allows them a unique platform to advocate for patients’ health. Developing countries are disproportionately impacted by climate change but less is known about the health effects related to climate change in these countries. This survey was done to summarize the observations of Nepali physicians on patients' health as affected by climate change, as well as to assess the need for educational opportunities in the medical community.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An electronic survey on health effects related to climate change and climate change awareness was sent to Nepali physicians by email and social media.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Almost all Nepali physician respondents (99%, <em>n</em> = 177) reported climate change is happening, and 67% of respondents mentioned time and 53% of respondents noted knowledge as the main barriers for communicating about climate change with patients. Nepali physicians mentioned training (87%), continuing professional education (85%), health action alerts (84%), patient education materials (84%) and policy statements by professional associations (79%) would be helpful for climate change communication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This survey presents a unique case study describing the health effects of climate change witnessed by physicians in Nepal. This survey highlights that Nepali physicians are keenly aware of the harmful effects of climate change on health, duly acknowledge gaps in education in this topic and report interest in future educational activities to enhance education and to improve their ability to communicate effectively regarding the health impacts of climate change with patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143838516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-06-07DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100458
Rhea Liang , John W. Orchard , Stephen J. Robson
If carbon emissions are not substantially reduced, human health will suffer irreparably. At the same time, global healthcare suffers from inequitable distribution which also leads to avoidable suffering. Health practitioners have always assessed treatment through the lens of potential benefits versus potential risks and harms. This lens must be widened to include global equity and carbon emissions if the triple goal of improving health, equitable delivery and environmental sustainability is to be achieved. This perspective looks at the surgery-specific challenges to sustainability through an equity lens, especially the tension between surgery being one of the most carbon-intensive forms of healthcare, and in many cases also being lifesaving or life-altering and hence essential. Carbon footprints should be made more visible, and sustainability should drive surgical innovation and be part of accreditation processes. Environmental impact should be built into research proposals, and the evidence arising from research used to make hard decisions about low value care. Carbon offsets may be a temporary measure. The surgery of the future must have a lower carbon footprint and consist of procedures that have been proven to be essential and/or of great benefit. Additionally, the burdens of achieving sustainable surgery must not exacerbate existing current or future healthcare inequity globally.
{"title":"The global surgical triple goal: Surgery must improve health, be equitable, and environmentally sustainable","authors":"Rhea Liang , John W. Orchard , Stephen J. Robson","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100458","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100458","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>If carbon emissions are not substantially reduced, human health will suffer irreparably. At the same time, global healthcare suffers from inequitable distribution which also leads to avoidable suffering. Health practitioners have always assessed treatment through the lens of potential benefits versus potential risks and harms. This lens must be widened to include global equity and carbon emissions if the triple goal of improving health, equitable delivery and environmental sustainability is to be achieved. This perspective looks at the surgery-specific challenges to sustainability through an equity lens, especially the tension between surgery being one of the most carbon-intensive forms of healthcare, and in many cases also being lifesaving or life-altering and hence essential. Carbon footprints should be made more visible, and sustainability should drive surgical innovation and be part of accreditation processes. Environmental impact should be built into research proposals, and the evidence arising from research used to make hard decisions about low value care. Carbon offsets may be a temporary measure. The surgery of the future must have a lower carbon footprint and consist of procedures that have been proven to be essential and/or of great benefit. Additionally, the burdens of achieving sustainable surgery must not exacerbate existing current or future healthcare inequity globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144241826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-01-03DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100410
Brandon X. Lum , Rebecca Y. Lee , Boon Woei Lee , Bee Lok Hoong , Eugene H. Liu
Introduction
While healthcare systems have to prepare for the impact on global health due to climate change, the healthcare sector must reduce carbon emissions and become environmentally sustainable. This paper provides an overview of how a healthcare system in Singapore, the National University Health System (NUHS), is transiting to sustainable healthcare.
Case presentation
NUHS used a “whole of system approach”, developing a system for governance, accountability, and management, and building internal capability to decarbonize healthcare. This was managed by a newly formed Office of Sustainability, to address the system's carbon footprint in clinical care, facilities management, and procurement. Strategies on sustainability focused on emissions and consumption that were material and significant to NUHS were pursued.
Discussion
NUHS encountered several challenges in the implementation of certain initiatives such as limited manpower and funding, managing supplier relationships and changing clinical practices. A key focus was to build internal capabilities and prioritize strategies to drive sustainability within the health system. Ensuring the availability of funding enabled the implementation of sustainability initiatives as well. Additionally, a growing workload with Singapore's aging local population would reduce the impact of sustainability initiatives on NUHS’ carbon footprint.
Conclusion
This paper aims to assist other healthcare systems embarking on their sustainability journeys to formulate a plan to decarbonize.
{"title":"A “Whole of system approach” to develop environmental sustainability in a Singapore Healthcare System","authors":"Brandon X. Lum , Rebecca Y. Lee , Boon Woei Lee , Bee Lok Hoong , Eugene H. Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100410","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100410","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While healthcare systems have to prepare for the impact on global health due to climate change, the healthcare sector must reduce carbon emissions and become environmentally sustainable. This paper provides an overview of how a healthcare system in Singapore, the National University Health System (NUHS), is transiting to sustainable healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>NUHS used a “whole of system approach”, developing a system for governance, accountability, and management, and building internal capability to decarbonize healthcare. This was managed by a newly formed Office of Sustainability, to address the system's carbon footprint in clinical care, facilities management, and procurement. Strategies on sustainability focused on emissions and consumption that were material and significant to NUHS were pursued.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>NUHS encountered several challenges in the implementation of certain initiatives such as limited manpower and funding, managing supplier relationships and changing clinical practices. A key focus was to build internal capabilities and prioritize strategies to drive sustainability within the health system. Ensuring the availability of funding enabled the implementation of sustainability initiatives as well. Additionally, a growing workload with Singapore's aging local population would reduce the impact of sustainability initiatives on NUHS’ carbon footprint.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This paper aims to assist other healthcare systems embarking on their sustainability journeys to formulate a plan to decarbonize.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143715383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100415
Samantha K. Stanley , Omid Ghasemi , Robert M. Ross , John R. Kerr , Mathew D. Marques , Niels G. Mede , Sebastian Berger , Mark Alfano , Neil Levy , Marinus Ferreira , Viktoria Cologna
Introduction
Lived experience of negative environmental change can evoke distress called ‘solastalgia’. Worldwide, people are reporting emotional challenges relating to awareness of current and continued environmental decline, even without a direct experience of climate change. Our research examines the measurement of anticipatory solastalgia: the experience of present distress about expected environmental change.
Methods
Our preregistered research uses survey samples from Australia (n = 1450) and New Zealand (n = 1022) to validate a recently developed five-item Anticipatory Solastalgia Scale (the ANSOS). We also measured participants’ experiences of climate emotions, expectations of the increased severity of climate-related weather disasters, and support for climate policy.
Results
The ANSOS fits the data well, is invariant across these two countries, and shows good internal consistency. Supporting convergent validity, the more that participants reported experiencing anticipatory solastalgia, the more intensely they reported feeling negative emotions about climate change. ANSOS scores were higher among those who expected more severe future impacts from climate-related weather disasters, and positively related to support for policies that aim to address climate change.
Conclusion
The study adds further evidence for the validity of the anticipatory solastalgia scale; a measure that is designed to facilitate understanding of people's distress responses to the expectations of, and emotional engagement with, environmental threats as the climate changes.
{"title":"Anticipatory solastalgia in the Antipodes: Evidence of future-oriented distress about environmental change in Australia and New Zealand","authors":"Samantha K. Stanley , Omid Ghasemi , Robert M. Ross , John R. Kerr , Mathew D. Marques , Niels G. Mede , Sebastian Berger , Mark Alfano , Neil Levy , Marinus Ferreira , Viktoria Cologna","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100415","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100415","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lived experience of negative environmental change can evoke distress called ‘solastalgia’. Worldwide, people are reporting emotional challenges relating to awareness of current and continued environmental decline, even without a direct experience of climate change. Our research examines the measurement of <em>anticipatory</em> solastalgia: the experience of present distress about expected environmental change.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our preregistered research uses survey samples from Australia (<em>n</em> = 1450) and New Zealand (<em>n</em> = 1022) to validate a recently developed five-item Anticipatory Solastalgia Scale (the ANSOS). We also measured participants’ experiences of climate emotions, expectations of the increased severity of climate-related weather disasters, and support for climate policy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ANSOS fits the data well, is invariant across these two countries, and shows good internal consistency. Supporting convergent validity, the more that participants reported experiencing anticipatory solastalgia, the more intensely they reported feeling negative emotions about climate change. ANSOS scores were higher among those who expected more severe future impacts from climate-related weather disasters, and positively related to support for policies that aim to address climate change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study adds further evidence for the validity of the anticipatory solastalgia scale; a measure that is designed to facilitate understanding of people's distress responses to the expectations of, and emotional engagement with, environmental threats as the climate changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143715448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100401
Michael Padget , Pernilla Sörme , Michael Spezia , Susan A. Slaugenhaupt , James McKowen , Emily Kirchner , Natalie Ameral , Surya A. Reis , Damien Slater , Stephen J. Haggarty , Benjamin P. Kleinstiver , Erin C. Dunn , Regina Larocque , Christiano R.R. Alves , Max Stern , Alida Pelli , Ann-Christine Duhaime
Introduction
The healthcare sector contributes considerably to greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Biomedical research within academic medical centers (AMCs) is particularly energy- and resource-intensive. This study sought to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a formal laboratory sustainability certification process within a large AMC research institute.
Methods
Five labs with diverse research profiles participated in an external certification process consisting of the collection of baseline questionnaire data, a customized intervention plan to reduce environmental impacts, and a follow-up questionnaire to assess changes made and their effects. Investigators also directly measured solid waste, audited benchtop and cold storage plug loads, measured selected energy and potential cost savings, and assessed researcher attitudes.
Results
All labs successfully achieved sustainability certification. Relevant and feasible interventions were identified for all participating labs. The main opportunities for improvements at the workplace that could be measured and are under the direct control of researchers included energy use and waste handling at the benchtop. Researchers generally were positive about the program and most expressed an interest in doing more to improve workplace sustainability. Financial estimates showed that intervention-related cost savings offset the cost of the certification process.
Conclusions
In the context of AMC research, where lab-specific autonomy, sizes, and age make a uniform “top-down” institutional approach to sustainability less applicable, customized sustainability certification programs can be effective and may help achieve environmental goals without significant cost or unduly burdensome behavioral changes.
{"title":"Environmental impact, cost, and acceptability of a laboratory sustainability certification program for biomedical research in an academic medical center","authors":"Michael Padget , Pernilla Sörme , Michael Spezia , Susan A. Slaugenhaupt , James McKowen , Emily Kirchner , Natalie Ameral , Surya A. Reis , Damien Slater , Stephen J. Haggarty , Benjamin P. Kleinstiver , Erin C. Dunn , Regina Larocque , Christiano R.R. Alves , Max Stern , Alida Pelli , Ann-Christine Duhaime","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100401","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100401","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The healthcare sector contributes considerably to greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Biomedical research within academic medical centers (AMCs) is particularly energy- and resource-intensive. This study sought to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a formal laboratory sustainability certification process within a large AMC research institute.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five labs with diverse research profiles participated in an external certification process consisting of the collection of baseline questionnaire data, a customized intervention plan to reduce environmental impacts, and a follow-up questionnaire to assess changes made and their effects. Investigators also directly measured solid waste, audited benchtop and cold storage plug loads, measured selected energy and potential cost savings, and assessed researcher attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All labs successfully achieved sustainability certification. Relevant and feasible interventions were identified for all participating labs. The main opportunities for improvements at the workplace that could be measured and are under the direct control of researchers included energy use and waste handling at the benchtop. Researchers generally were positive about the program and most expressed an interest in doing more to improve workplace sustainability. Financial estimates showed that intervention-related cost savings offset the cost of the certification process.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the context of AMC research, where lab-specific autonomy, sizes, and age make a uniform “top-down” institutional approach to sustainability less applicable, customized sustainability certification programs can be effective and may help achieve environmental goals without significant cost or unduly burdensome behavioral changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143715449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-05-09DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100455
Jil Beckord , Julia Barbara Krakowczyk , Nadja Gebhardt , Leonie Sophie Geiser , Katharina Kamler , Christoph Nikendei , Eva-Maria Skoda , Martin Teufel , Alexander Bäuerle
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Development and validation of a climate change version of the man-made disaster-related distress scale (CC-MMDS)” [J Climate Change Health 20 (2024) 100356]","authors":"Jil Beckord , Julia Barbara Krakowczyk , Nadja Gebhardt , Leonie Sophie Geiser , Katharina Kamler , Christoph Nikendei , Eva-Maria Skoda , Martin Teufel , Alexander Bäuerle","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100455","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100455","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143922241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Climate change threatens human well-being and planetary health, necessitating sector-wide transitions. Recent research has highlighted the carbon footprint of hospital care by identifying hotspots and mitigation areas, but key factors influencing these outcomes remain underexplored.
Methods
This study used causal mapping of textual data to systematically evaluate scientific reports on the carbon footprint of hospital services and care pathways. The sample was drawn from a State-of-the-science literature review, focusing on quantitative reports on hospital services’ carbon footprint. Text fragments discussing factors influencing the carbon footprint were recorded, and variables and relationships were identified and visually mapped through iterative open, axial, and selective coding.
Results
Twelve main factors influence four major domains of the carbon footprint of hospital services and care pathways. These factors are related to the volume of travel, facilities and equipment, consumables, waste disposal, and pharmaceuticals, and their carbon intensity. Over eighty subfactors were identified, including ten cross-cutting factors that affect multiple domains of the hospital care footprint.
Conclusions
The carbon footprint of hospital care is a multifaceted and complex issue driven by multiple factors. Insight into these factors can inform targeted actions to reduce emissions. This study also improves the understanding of the causes of variability in carbon footprint outcomes of hospital care, which is important for the interpretation and transferability of results and conclusions in this rapidly growing field of research.
{"title":"The interplay of factors influencing the carbon footprint of hospital care—A causal mapping analysis of scientific reports","authors":"L.H.J.A. Kouwenberg , D.S. Kringos , W.J.K. Hehenkamp , E.S. Cohen , N.H. Sperna Weiland","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100427","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100427","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Climate change threatens human well-being and planetary health, necessitating sector-wide transitions. Recent research has highlighted the carbon footprint of hospital care by identifying hotspots and mitigation areas, but key factors influencing these outcomes remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used causal mapping of textual data to systematically evaluate scientific reports on the carbon footprint of hospital services and care pathways. The sample was drawn from a State-of-the-science literature review, focusing on quantitative reports on hospital services’ carbon footprint. Text fragments discussing factors influencing the carbon footprint were recorded, and variables and relationships were identified and visually mapped through iterative open, axial, and selective coding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve main factors influence four major domains of the carbon footprint of hospital services and care pathways. These factors are related to the volume of travel, facilities and equipment, consumables, waste disposal, and pharmaceuticals, and their carbon intensity. Over eighty subfactors were identified, including ten cross-cutting factors that affect multiple domains of the hospital care footprint.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The carbon footprint of hospital care is a multifaceted and complex issue driven by multiple factors. Insight into these factors can inform targeted actions to reduce emissions. This study also improves the understanding of the causes of variability in carbon footprint outcomes of hospital care, which is important for the interpretation and transferability of results and conclusions in this rapidly growing field of research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143715447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Many island-based Indigenous communities continue to occupy, manage and live off and from their ancestral lands. For some Indigenous Islander communities, climate change is already causing destruction to fragile ecosystems, affecting traditional food supply, and impacting on the health and livelihoods of communities.
Materials and methods
The voices gathered through extended yarns of Torres Strait Islander Peoples was featured as a case study to describe the range of physical and psycho-social impacts from climatic changes to their Country, as well as their priority climate responses.
Results & discussion
In describing climate change impacts and priority responses, Torres Strait Islander community members detailed five aspects of concern to them. These were to adequately monitor climatic changes and respond appropriately by drawing on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Knowledges, to consider the human rights inherent in being protected from climate change, and to develop locally led solutions that are implemented soon.
Conclusion
The impacts of climate change that are being seen and felt in Australia's Torres Strait Islands hold many similarities with small island nations in the Pacific whose islands are remote, climate-exposed, and their voices unheard on the political stage despite experiencing irreversible damage and gradual disappearance of their ancestral lands.
{"title":"Voices of hard-to-reach island communities provide inclusive and culturally appropriate climate change responses: A case study from the Torres Strait Islands, Australia","authors":"Vinnitta Mosby , Bradley J. Moggridge , Sandra Creamer , Geoffrey Evans , Lillian Ireland , Gretta Pecl , Nina Lansbury","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100450","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100450","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Many island-based Indigenous communities continue to occupy, manage and live off and from their ancestral lands. For some Indigenous Islander communities, climate change is already causing destruction to fragile ecosystems, affecting traditional food supply, and impacting on the health and livelihoods of communities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The voices gathered through extended yarns of Torres Strait Islander Peoples was featured as a case study to describe the range of physical and psycho-social impacts from climatic changes to their Country, as well as their priority climate responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results & discussion</h3><div>In describing climate change impacts and priority responses, Torres Strait Islander community members detailed five aspects of concern to them. These were to adequately monitor climatic changes and respond appropriately by drawing on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Knowledges, to consider the human rights inherent in being protected from climate change, and to develop locally led solutions that are implemented soon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The impacts of climate change that are being seen and felt in Australia's Torres Strait Islands hold many similarities with small island nations in the Pacific whose islands are remote, climate-exposed, and their voices unheard on the political stage despite experiencing irreversible damage and gradual disappearance of their ancestral lands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143904325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100459
Romina Rekers , María Victoria Gerbaldo , Carlos Yabar , Cintia Rodríguez Garat , Lucas Rekers
Background
Integrating justice enablers into climate-health adaptation planning reduces failed adaptation, prevents maladaptation, and facilitates transformative change in health systems. This is particularly necessary in South America (SA), where climate adaptation research and policy are financially constrained. By carefully considering differentiated climate-health risks and necessary trade-offs, National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and Health National Adaptation Plans (HNAPs) provide forums for identifying just adaptation paths. This study assesses the integration of recognitional, procedural, and distributive justice enablers in climate-health planning in SA.
Methods
Justice enablers were tracked within the actionable sections of the NAPs, HNAPs, or their Subsidiary Adaptation Strategies (SASs) of the South American countries. The level of integration of justice enablers was measured using keywords from the climate adaptation literature.
Results
There is a significant disparity among countries in the level of integration of justice enablers in national adaptation planning. There is also significant variation across countries in the integration of different dimensions of justice (recognitional, procedural, distributive). Most countries score higher on the integration of recognition justice than on procedural and distributive justice.
Conclusion
Comprehensive frameworks are required to integrate justice considerations into climate-health adaptation planning in a way that avoids failed adaptation or maladaptation.
{"title":"Justice enablers of climate-health adaptation in South America","authors":"Romina Rekers , María Victoria Gerbaldo , Carlos Yabar , Cintia Rodríguez Garat , Lucas Rekers","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100459","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100459","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrating justice enablers into climate-health adaptation planning reduces failed adaptation, prevents maladaptation, and facilitates transformative change in health systems. This is particularly necessary in South America (SA), where climate adaptation research and policy are financially constrained. By carefully considering differentiated climate-health risks and necessary trade-offs, National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and Health National Adaptation Plans (HNAPs) provide forums for identifying just adaptation paths. This study assesses the integration of recognitional, procedural, and distributive justice enablers in climate-health planning in SA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Justice enablers were tracked within the actionable sections of the NAPs, HNAPs, or their Subsidiary Adaptation Strategies (SASs) of the South American countries. The level of integration of justice enablers was measured using keywords from the climate adaptation literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is a significant disparity among countries in the level of integration of justice enablers in national adaptation planning. There is also significant variation across countries in the integration of different dimensions of justice (recognitional, procedural, distributive). Most countries score higher on the integration of recognition justice than on procedural and distributive justice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Comprehensive frameworks are required to integrate justice considerations into climate-health adaptation planning in a way that avoids failed adaptation or maladaptation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144281015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-06-11DOI: 10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100453
Eun-Young Lee , Seiyeong Park , Leigh M Vanderloo , Leah J Ferguson , Amy E. Latimer-Cheung , Norman O’Reilly , Ryan E Rhodes , John C Spence , Mark S Tremblay , Guy Faulkner
Introduction
Political orientation is known to influence health behaviors and policy support. This study examined the implications of political orientation on the social climate of physical activity (PA) and policy support addressing both climate change and PA (i.e., climate–health co-benefits) in Canada.
Materials and Methods
Based on the Social Climate Survey 2.0 (18 years+) data, study variables included political orientation (liberal/centrist/conservative), perceived importance of PA, adherence to PA guidelines, causal attributions of physical inactivity, and support for health co-benefits policy actions. Logistic and mediation analyses were performed.
Results
Among 1,717 adults, no associations were observed between political orientation and perceived importance of PA or PA guideline adherence. Compared to liberals, both centrists (OR: 1.63, 95 %CI: 1.25–2.08) and conservatives (OR: 1.76, 95 %CI: 1.33–2.32) attributed physical inactivity to individual responsibility. Regarding the endorsement of eight climate–health co-benefits policy actions, centrists (ORs: 0.53–0.66) and conservatives were less likely to support such actions (ORs: 0.27–0.48), compared to liberals, which were partially explained by the attribution of causes for physical inactivity, among conservatives only.
Discussions
Most Canadian adults recognized the importance of PA. Support for climate-health co-benefit policies varied by political orientation, with centrists showing mixed support—favoring cost-effective policy actions. Causal beliefs appear to be associated with lower support for policy actions among conservatives.
Conclusion
Tailoring public health messages, policy advocacy strategies, and investment priorities to align with varying political orientations may be important for addressing climate–health co-benefits and its broader public health implications in Canada.
{"title":"The political landscape of physical activity and climate action in Canada’s social climate","authors":"Eun-Young Lee , Seiyeong Park , Leigh M Vanderloo , Leah J Ferguson , Amy E. Latimer-Cheung , Norman O’Reilly , Ryan E Rhodes , John C Spence , Mark S Tremblay , Guy Faulkner","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100453","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100453","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Political orientation is known to influence health behaviors and policy support. This study examined the implications of political orientation on the social climate of physical activity (PA) and policy support addressing both climate change and PA (i.e., climate–health co-benefits) in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Based on the Social Climate Survey 2.0 (18 years+) data, study variables included political orientation (liberal/centrist/conservative), perceived importance of PA, adherence to PA guidelines, causal attributions of physical inactivity, and support for health co-benefits policy actions. Logistic and mediation analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 1,717 adults, no associations were observed between political orientation and perceived importance of PA or PA guideline adherence. Compared to liberals, both centrists (OR: 1.63, 95 %CI: 1.25–2.08) and conservatives (OR: 1.76, 95 %CI: 1.33–2.32) attributed physical inactivity to individual responsibility. Regarding the endorsement of eight climate–health co-benefits policy actions, centrists (ORs: 0.53–0.66) and conservatives were less likely to support such actions (ORs: 0.27–0.48), compared to liberals, which were partially explained by the attribution of causes for physical inactivity, among conservatives only.</div></div><div><h3>Discussions</h3><div>Most Canadian adults recognized the importance of PA. Support for climate-health co-benefit policies varied by political orientation, with centrists showing mixed support—favoring cost-effective policy actions. Causal beliefs appear to be associated with lower support for policy actions among conservatives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Tailoring public health messages, policy advocacy strategies, and investment priorities to align with varying political orientations may be important for addressing climate–health co-benefits and its broader public health implications in Canada.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144264118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}