The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM最新文献

Introduction: The Society for Education in Anesthesia (SEA) promotes dissemination of discoveries and innovations. We investigated the rate of publication of SEA Spring Meeting abstracts, hypothesizing that Research abstracts were published more frequently than Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We also studied the time between abstract presentation and publication and tracked the journals in which they were published.

Methods: All abstracts presented at SEA spring meetings from 2011-2019 were included. We searched PubMed for published articles that were based on those SEA abstracts. We calculated the overall publication rate and the respective publication rates for Research and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and performed the Pearson χ² test to compare publication rates between Research abstracts and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated the mean number of years between meeting presentation and publication and tabulated the number of works published in each journal.

Results: A total of 351 abstracts (128 Research and 223 Curriculum) were presented at SEA spring meetings. The overall publication rate was 15% (52/351). Research abstracts were published more frequently than Curriculum abstracts: 24.2% (31/128) versus 9.4% (21/223); OR = 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.6); P = .0003. The mean time from presentation to publication was 1.7 ± 1.3 years. The works appeared in 20 different journals.

Conclusion: SEA Spring Meeting abstracts were published less frequently than abstracts from other medical professional society meetings (21%-72.3%). Although the lower publication rate of Innovative Curriculum abstracts unique to the SEA meeting largely explains this shortfall, a relatively low publication rate, even for the Research abstracts, signals opportunities for growth.

Background: Breaking bad news (BBN) is an important clinical task for physicians. Unfortunately, there is no standard method to teach and assess these skills of anesthesiologists. Although anesthesiology has become a relatively safe medical specialty, complications still occur that require disclosure to patients and their families. Disclosure of bad news can be a significant source of stress for clinicians, especially for those who have low confidence in their BBN skills. Anesthesiologists' skills in BBN can be improved with simulation-based mastery learning (SBML), an intense form of competency-based learning.

Methods: An SBML curriculum was developed using the SPIKES (Situation, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, Summarize) framework for BBN and the NURSE (Naming, Understanding, Respecting, Supporting, Exploring) statements for expressing empathy. A pretest-posttest study was conducted from March 2020 to June 2022 to evaluate anesthesiologists' performance in BBN. Participants completed a 2-hour curriculum consisting of a pretest, didactic session, deliberate practice with feedback, and a posttest. Anesthesiologists were assessed using a 16-item skills checklist.

Results: Six anesthesiology attendings and 14 anesthesiology fellows were enrolled in the study. Three of 20 participants met the minimum passing score (MPS) at the time of their pretest. All study participants met the MPS on their first posttest (P < .001). The median participant confidence in BBN significantly increased (3 to 4, P < .001). Overall course satisfaction in the curriculum was high, with a median score of 5.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that a BBN SBML curriculum for anesthesiologists significantly improved communication skills and confidence in a simulated environment. Because only 3 participants met the MPS before training, our results suggest that anesthesiologists could benefit from further education to gain effective communication skills and that SBML training may be effective to achieve this result.

Background: This study reviews and appraises the articles published about anesthesiology education in 2020. The objective is to highlight high-quality evidence while showcasing articles with innovative ideas and high relevance to the practices of the anesthesiology education community.

Methods: Three Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase.com, ERIC, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched, followed by a manual review of articles published in the highest impact factor journals in both the fields of anesthesiology and medical education. Abstracts were double screened, and quantitative articles were subsequently scored by 3 randomly assigned raters. Qualitative studies were scored by 2 raters. Two different rubrics were used for scoring quantitative and qualitative studies. In addition, reviewers rated each article on its overall quality to create an additional list of top articles based solely on the opinion of the reviewers.

Results: A total of 2,491 citations were identified through the search criteria and the manual review. Of those, 61 articles met the inclusion criteria (57 quantitative and 4 qualitative). The top 12 quantitative papers and the top qualitative papers with the highest scores are reported and summarized.

Conclusions: We found that teaching clinical procedures continues to be a topic of interest, with more studies of improved rigor identified. New trends in wellness studies and increasing attention to distance learning and technology-assisted instructional methods were additional topics covered over the year.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of engaging in preparatory expansive posing on the performance of anesthesiology trainees during a mock structured oral examination.

Methods: A total of 38 clinical residents at a single institution participated in this prospective randomized controlled study. Participants were stratified by clinical anesthesia year and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 orientation rooms to prepare for the examination. The preparatory expansive posing participants stood for 2 minutes with their hands and arms above their heads and with their feet approximately 1 ft apart. Conversely, the control participants sat quietly in a chair for 2 minutes. All participants then received the same orientation and examination. Faculty evaluation of resident performance, residents' self-assessment of performance, and anxiety score were collected.

Results: There was no evidence to support our primary hypothesis that residents who engaged in preparatory expansive posing for 2 minutes prior to a mock structured oral examination would score higher than their control counterparts (P = .68). There was no evidence to support our secondary hypotheses that preparatory expansive posing increases self-assessment of one's performance (P = .31) or reduces perceived anxiety during a mock structured oral examination (P = .85).

Conclusions: Preparatory expansive posing did not improve anesthesiology residents' mock structured oral examination performance or self-assessment of their performance, nor did it reduce their perceived anxiety. Preparatory expansive posing is likely not a useful technique in improving the performance of residents in structured oral examinations.

Background: Clinician-educators in academic settings have often had no formal training in teaching or in giving feedback to trainees. We implemented a Clinician-Educator Track within the Department of Anesthesiology with the initial goal of improving teaching skills through a didactic curriculum and experiential opportunities for a broad audience of faculty, fellows, and residents. We then assessed our program for feasibility and effectiveness.

Methods: We developed a 1-year curriculum focusing on adult learning theory, evidence-based best teaching practices in different educational settings, and giving feedback. We recorded the number of participants and their attendance at monthly sessions. The year culminated in a voluntary observed teaching session using an objective assessment rubric to structure feedback. Participants in the Clinician-Educator Track then evaluated the program through anonymous online surveys. Qualitative content analysis of the survey comments was performed using inductive coding to generate relevant categories and identify the main themes.

Results: There were 19 participants in the first year of the program and 16 in the second year. Attendance at most sessions remained high. Participants appreciated the flexibility and design of scheduled sessions. They very much enjoyed the voluntary observed teaching sessions to practice what they had learned throughout the year. All participants were satisfied with the Clinician-Educator Track, and many participants described changes and improvements in their teaching practices due to the course.

Conclusions: The implementation of a novel, anesthesiology-specific Clinician-Educator Track has been feasible and successful, with participants reporting improved teaching skills and overall satisfaction with the program.

Background: This learning opportunity was designed to provide an interactive, virtual, educational anesthesiology program for interested medical students and to offer an opportunity to learn more about an institutional culture through a question and answer (Q&A) with program faculty preceptors for the 2020-2021 anesthesiology residency application cycle. We sought to identify if this virtual learning program was a valuable educational tool through a survey.

Methods: A short Likert-scale survey was sent to medical students before and after participation in a session using REDCap electronic data capture tool. We designed the survey to assess the program's self-reported effect on participants' anesthesiology knowledge, and whether the program design was successful in creating a collaborative experience while also providing a forum to explore residency programs.

Results: All respondents found the call useful in building anesthesiology knowledge and networking, and 42 (86%) found the call helpful in deciding where to apply for residency. Overall, 100% of respondents found the call useful, collaborative, engaging, and important to define critical thinking skills.

Conclusions: The framework used for this program-virtual asynchronous and synchronous problem-based learning-can be applied broadly with potential benefit to medical student participants challenged by the cancellation of clinical rotations.

Background: Beginning an unfamiliar rotation can be challenging as residents must expand their knowledge and skills to meet new clinical expectations, work with a new team of providers, and sometimes care for a new patient demographic. This may detract from learning, resident well-being, and patient care.

Methods: We implemented an obstetric anesthesia simulation session for anesthesiology residents prior to their first obstetric anesthesia rotation and measured the effect on residents' self-perceived preparedness.

Results: The simulation session increased residents' feelings of preparedness for the rotation and increased residents' confidence in specific obstetric anesthesia skills.

Conclusions: Importantly, this study shows the potential for the use of a prerotation, rotation-specific simulation session to better prepare learners for rotations.