The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM最新文献

Background: Providers' unconscious biases reinforce health disparities through negative direct patient care and interactions with colleagues.

Objective: We created a workshop grounded in Critical Race Theory and the importance of different intersectionalities to improve medical trainees' self-assessment of their implicit biases in curated facilitated spaces.

Methods: A total of 44 UCSF first-year clinical anesthesiology residents (CA-1) (95% response rate) and 23 surgery residents in their research year (77% response rate) participated in this workshop over 4 separate sessions in September 2020 and 2021. Quantitative data from a pre-/post-workshop survey was analyzed via a paired t test to evaluate our workshop's effectiveness. Feedback on efficacy was obtained by coding themes from our survey's open-ended questions.

Results: The workshop was evaluated positively by a total of 65 of 67 participants in the post-workshop survey. On a 5-point Likert scale, participants self-reported they agreed that their unconscious biases affect their clinical interactions from a pre-workshop mean of 3.3 (SD ± 1.32) to a post-workshop mean of 3.9 (SD ± 0.87, P = .008).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that this workshop was effective for perioperative residents and can be extrapolated to all residents by tailoring the workshop to their respective work environments.

Background: Academic inquiry is foundational to the advancement of medicine and resident training and must be demonstrated to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Past attempts at increasing publication rates have failed to identify educational best practice models. Our aim was to increase resident publication rates via culture and value changes that are universally implementable, affordable, effective, and sustainable.

Methods: In 2018, a multifaceted initiative was implemented to shift departmental values and foster a culture of academic productivity. This culture change stressed the value of scientific publication through frequent, consistent messaging from department leaders. In addition, residents were provided the freedom to choose their scholarly activities. In this retrospective cohort innovation, resident authors were identified for 4 academic years before and after the intervention and publication rates were determined (2014-2018 vs 2018-2022). Resident authors and publications per resident per year were compared using descriptive statistics and Student t test.

Results: The pre- and postintervention groups included 38 and 37 residents, respectively. Resident-authored publications increased from 7 preintervention to 24 postintervention, representing 343% of baseline. Mean ± SD publications per resident per year similarly increased 357% from 0.183 ± 0.16 to 0.654 ± 0.11 postintervention. Unpaired t test analysis demonstrated a significant difference in total publications per year (P = .002) and authorship rate (P = .003).

Conclusions: A multifaceted academic initiative resulted in a threefold increase in resident publication rates. This initiative demonstrates that local advocacy by leaders, freedom of choice for authors, and supportive departmental culture are driving factors in publication rates.

Background: Cricoid pressure (CP) is applied to occlude the esophagus during endotracheal intubation in patients at an increased risk of aspiration of gastric contents. Evidence shows marked deficiencies in knowledge and skills for CP application among personnel responsible for this task. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CP training in improving knowledge and skills regarding CP application among anesthesiology technicians and critical care nurses and assessed the retention of skills after 2 months.

Methods: Five workshops were conducted on effective application of CP. Indications, relevant anatomy, physiology, and correct technique were taught using interactive sessions and videos and hands-on practice on a weighing scale, 50-mL syringe, and trainer model. Pre- and postworkshop tests were conducted for knowledge and skill. An assessment was repeated after 2 months to assess skill retention.

Results: Five workshops were conducted for 102 participants. Statistically significant improvements were seen in mean scores for knowledge in postworkshop assessments (12.32 ± 2.12 versus 7.12 ± 2.32; P < .01). Similarly, posttraining mean scores for skill assessment were significantly higher than pretraining scores (6.31 ± 0.96 versus 2.72 ± 2.00; P < .0005), indicating an overall 131% improvement. Seventy-four participants appeared for assessment of the retention of skills. A 20% decrement was observed compared with posttraining scores (5.15 ± 1.71 versus 6.45 ± 0.86; P < .0005).

Conclusions: A significant improvement was observed in both knowledge and skills immediately following training. However, this does not ensure long-term retention of clinical skills, as a 20% decrement was observed 2 months after the workshops. Formal training and regular practice are recommended to enable clinicians to perform CP effectively.

Background: New trainees are directly supervised by either an attending physician or a senior resident under indirect supervision from an attending physician. The main objective was to evaluate which type of direct supervision (attending vs. senior resident) would result in better quality of supervision to novice residents during their first month of training.

Methods: Novice anesthesiology residents were randomized to receive direct supervision by an attending anesthesiologist or a senior resident during their introduction month of intraoperative anesthesia. The primary outcome was a validated instrument to evaluate supervision performance of the instructor. The secondary outcome was a validated anxiety scale.

Results: The overall mean supervision score across the study days was greater in the residents who were directly supervised by attendings, mean (standard error [SE]) of 3.88 ± 0.03 compared with direct supervision by a senior resident, mean (SE) of 3.77 ± 0.03 a mean difference of 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.16), P = .0012. Five of 9 individual items on the supervision survey were significantly greater in the group directly supervised by attendings compared with residents. There was no difference between groups regarding anxiety scores. In contrast, there was a mild association between supervision scores and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 anxiety scores, correlation coefficient = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08-0.39), P < .0035.

Conclusions: We detected better supervision scores when novice anesthesiology residents were directly supervised by attendings when compared with senior residents. Nevertheless, direct supervision by senior residents still provided supervision scores consistent with a safe supervision practice.

Background: The transition from intern year to the first year of clinical anesthesiology residency (CA-1) is a challenging period for residents and their supervisors. Orientation methods and instructional material targeting this transition vary across U.S. residency programs. An un-pairing passport was implemented during the 2021-2022 transition to guide and provide expectations for interns, senior residents, and staff. The objective of this quality improvement project was to assess the effectiveness of the passport in improving the transition period and overall preparedness of the new CA-1s.

Methods: We surveyed 3 groups (CA-1s, CA-2s/CA-3s, and staff anesthesiologists) 6 months after the completion of passport implementation to retrospectively assess the 2021-2022 CA-1 class's preparedness across 7 domains compared with those who transitioned before passport implementation. Mann-Whitney U statistics and median effect sizes were used to compare pre- and postintervention.

Results: Self-reflected preparedness scores of the CA-1s were higher across all domains compared with the senior resident group (r = 0.328-0.548). Overall level of comfort and preparedness for the start of the CA-1 year was higher in the postintervention group (r = 0.162- 0.514). Staff anesthesiologists' perceived preparedness of the residents was also higher across all domains for the postintervention group (r = 0.197-0.387).

Conclusion: The un-pairing passport improved residents' and staff anesthesiologists' subjective assessments of the readiness of new CA-1 residents after a critical transition in their training. Similar tools can be more broadly applied to other anesthesiology residency and possibly fellowship programs as well as subspecialty rotations within those programs.

Background: With more than 50% of anesthesiology residents reporting burnout, many residency programs have begun creating wellness programs to address burnout and promote well-being. However, to date, many wellness initiatives have focused on individual strategies rather than systems approaches to improve the learning environment. Individual-focused interventions in the absence of systematic efforts can lead to resentment, resistance, and worsening burnout and precipitate a loss of trust in leadership and the organization. Here, we describe a process to engage anesthesiology residents, who are key stakeholders, by exploring their perspectives on burnout and well-being to better inform systematic interventions to improve the clinical work and learning environments.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with second- and third-year clinical anesthesia residents at the University of California, San Francisco, using the areas of worklife model as sensitizing concepts. We conducted a thematic analysis on transcribed interviews grounded in constructivist orientation.

Results: We identified the following 3 major categories of themes based on interviews with 10 residents: (1) definition of well-being, (2) challenges to well-being, and (3) strategies for coping with challenges and burnout. Challenges described by anesthesiology residents align with the areas of the worklife model, with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic precipitating additional threats in the domains of workload and community.

Conclusions: Anesthesiology residents' definition of well-being includes both individual (resilience) and systemic (meaning in work, job autonomy, and control) factors, reaffirming that positive work and learning environments are critical to professional well-being.